Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for breast cancer patients with an early metastatic relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy: two clinical trials

BackgroundDespite recent advances in treating patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), outcomes remain poor. Ixabepilone is a semisynthetic analogue of epothilone B with low susceptibility to multiple mechanisms of tumor-cell resistance. This review examined the results of 2 phase III clinical trials of ixabepilone in patients with drug-resistant or heavily pretreated, locally advanced breast cancer or MBC.Patients and MethodsIn both studies, women with locally advanced breast cancer or MBC pretreated with, or resistant to, taxanes or anthracyclines were randomly assigned to ixabepilone plus capecitabine, or capecitabine alone, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.ResultsIxabepilone plus capecitabine significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine alone. The median PFS was prolonged by 1.5 months and 1.8 months in the 2 studies (hazard ratio, < 0.8 in both studies; P ≥ .001). These observations remained valid within several patient subsets: those receiving ixabepilone as first-line therapy, those with taxane-resistant disease, and those with particularly poor prognostic features. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with capecitabine in patients with symptomatic disease (12.3 vs. 9.5 months, respectively; P = .015). Peripheral neuropathy with ixabepilone was generally reversible and was effectively managed by dosage reduction in most patients. Ixabepilone did not exacerbate capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome or diarrhea.ConclusionThe results of these 2 large phase III trials suggest that ixabepilone plus capecitabine may improve treatment outcomes for patients with locally advanced breast cancer or MBC resistant to, or heavily pretreated with, taxanes or anthracyclines, even in those with poor prognostic features.     

Preclinical discovery of ixabepilone, a highly active antineoplastic agent

The epothilones and their analogs constitute a novel class of antineoplastic agents, produced by the myxobacterium Sorangium cellulosum. These antimicrotubule agents act in a similar manner to taxanes, stabilizing microtubules and resulting in arrested tumor cell division and apoptosis. Unlike taxanes, however, epothilones and their analogs are macrolide antibiotics, with a distinct tubulin binding mode and reduced susceptibility to a range of common tumor resistance mechanisms that limit the effectiveness of taxanes and anthracyclines. While natural epothilones A and B show potent antineoplastic activity in vitro, these effects were not seen in preclinical in vivo models due to their poor metabolic stability and unfavorable pharmacokinetics. A range of epothilone analogs was synthesized, therefore, with the aim of identifying those with more favorable characteristics. Here, we describe the preclinical characterization and selection of ixabepilone, a semi-synthetic epothilone B analog, among many other epothilone analogs. Ixabepilone demonstrated superior preclinical characteristics, including high metabolic stability, low plasma protein binding and low susceptibility to multidrug resistance protein-mediated efflux, all of which were predictive of potent in vivo cell-killing activity. Ixabepilone also demonstrated in vivo antitumor activity in a range of human tumor models, several of which displayed resistance to commonly used agents such as anthracyclines and taxanes. These favorable preclinical characteristics have since translated to the clinic. Ixabepilone has shown promising phase II clinical efficacy and acceptable tolerability in a wide range of cancers, including heavily pretreated and drug-resistant tumors. Based on these results, a randomized phase III trial was conducted in anthracycline-pretreated or resistant and taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer to evaluate ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine. Ixabepilone combination therapy showed significantly superior progression-free survival and tumor responses over capecitabine alone.     

Efficacy of ixabepilone in ER/PR/HER2-negative (triple-negative) breast cancer

Patients with ER/PR/HER2-negative (triple negative) breast cancer are not candidates for hormonal therapy or HER2-targeted agents. Ongoing research is aimed at identifying and understanding the benefit of established and emerging therapies in this disease setting. Triple-negative patients may achieve early responses to anthracyclines and taxanes, but novel strategies are also eagerly sought. The epothilone B analog ixabepilone acts to stabilize microtubules and demonstrates antitumor activity in recent breast cancer studies. Herein, we have analyzed efficacy and safety data of ixabepilone specifically for the treatment of women with triple-negative disease. A retrospective analysis was completed using activity and toxicity data in the triple-negative subsets from 5 phase II studies. In addition, a prospective pooled analysis of triple-negative patients from 2 phase III trials is also reviewed. Of 2,261 patients evaluated in these trials, 556 (24.5%) had triple-negative tumors. In the neoadjuvant setting, ixabepilone produced a pathologic complete response rate in the breast of 26% in triple-negative patients (vs. 15% in the non-triple-negative population). In patients with metastatic breast cancer whose pretreatment status ranged from no prior therapy to progression on several classes of agents, overall response rates (ORR) in the phase II ixabepilone monotherapy trials ranged from 6 to 55%, comparable to rates seen in patients with non-triple-negative tumors. The combination of ixabepilone and capecitabine in the phase II study resulted in an ORR of 23% in triple-negative patients. A similar ORR (31%) was observed for a preplanned pooled analysis of triple-negative patients in the phase III trials of ixabepilone plus capecitabine. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for triple-negative patients treated with ixabepilone plus capecitabine (4.2 months) compared with treatment with capecitabine alone (1.7 months). No increase in toxicity was noted in the triple-negative subgroup compared with other patients. Ixabepilone shows notable antitumor activity in patients with triple-negative breast cancer when used in a variety of settings. The addition of ixabepilone to capecitabine results in an approximately twofold increase in median PFS for triple-negative patients versus capecitabine alone and responses to ixabepilone in triple-negative disease are comparable to those seen in patients with non-triple-negative tumors.     

Ixabepilone, first in a new class of antineoplastic agents: the natural epothilones and their analogues

Although targeted therapies are becoming increasingly important in oncology, cytotoxic agents are likely to remain a valuable element in the treatment paradigm of cancer. However, resistance to chemotherapy is a major obstacle to the successful treatment of cancer. Therefore, there is a need for novel antineoplastic agents that are able to overcome mechanisms of tumor resistance. Drugs that target microtubules, including paclitaxel and docetaxel, are among the most commonly prescribed anticancer therapies. However, the utility of taxane-based therapies is limited by difficulties with formulation, administration, and resistance induced by P-glycoprotein. The epothilones and their analogues are a novel class of antimicrotubule agents that has demonstrated antitumor activity in the setting of resistance. These antimicrotubule agents are structurally unrelated to the taxanes, with a distinct beta-tubulin-binding mode. Ixabepilone is a rationally designed, semisynthetic analogue of natural epothilone B, which displays reduced susceptibility to a range of common tumor resistance mechanisms. Promising phase II activity and a manageable safety profile with ixabepilone have been seen in a wide range of tumor types, including heavily pretreated/resistant and early-stage breast cancer. Moreover, encouraging phase III results with ixabepilone and capecitabine for patients with breast cancer have recently been presented. Clinical trials are also planned for ixabepilone in combination with targeted agents, such as trastuzumab and bevacizumab. Ixabepilone is likely to be the first available drug in its class, with the potential to bring clinical benefit to patients with a wide range of malignancies.     

Ixabepilone for the treatment of taxane-refractory breast cancer

The ephothilones are a novel class of agents that bind to beta-tubulin, promote microtubule stabilization and cause cell-cycle arrest in G2/M phase. Ixabepilone (Ixempra) is an epothilone B that has demonstrated preclinical activity against a variety of tumor types and has recently been US FDA approved (application for registration ongoing in Europe) as a single agent for the treatment of taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer, or in combination with capecitabine for patients with advanced breast cancer refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes. This review will provide an overview of the clinical development of ixabepilone, and emphasize the drug's utility for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.     

Optimizing ixabepilone treatment schedules in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer

The epothilone B analog, ixabepilone, demonstrates low susceptibility to drug resistance mechanisms and has demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy in patients refractory to other chemotherapeutic options. Ixabepilone is approved by the FDA for treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing after taxanes and anthracyclines, either in combination with capecitabine or as monotherapy if the patient has already progressed on capecitabine. Ixabepilone is generally well tolerated at the approved dose and administration schedule of 40 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. The most commonly observed dose-limiting adverse events (AEs) associated with ixabepilone are myelosuppression and peripheral neuropathy. Dose modification including dose reduction and dosing schedule modification may be utilized to manage toxicities, but this must be based on careful hematologic, neurologic, and liver function monitoring. Other ixabepilone dose schedules are being evaluated to further improve the risk/benefit profile. Weekly and daily schedules of ixabepilone have shown useful efficacy and reasonable tolerability. A recent phase II trial compared the tolerability of ixabepilone dosed once weekly (16 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) or every 3 weeks (40 mg/m(2) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle) in patients with MBC. Preliminary data showed that both dosing schedules had an acceptable safety profile; however, more AEs were reported in patients receiving ixabepilone every 3 weeks. Ixabepilone is also being evaluated in combination with other anticancer agents (e.g., bevacizumab and lapatinib), in earlier breast cancer settings and in other indications.     

Activity of Ixabepilone in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer with Primary Resistance to Taxanes

Primary drug resistance, defined as disease progression as best response to treatment, presents an important problem in everyday clinical practice. Primary taxane resistance, reported in up to 55% of patients with breast cancer, plays a critical role in minimizing the efficacy of taxane-based chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The epothilones are a novel class of antineoplastic agents, developed to overcome tumor-resistance mechanisms. Ixabepilone, the first drug in this class, stabilizes microtubule polymerization, and induces cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Ixabepilone demonstrates low susceptibility to different and multiple mechanisms of drug resistance that play a crucial role in primary taxane resistance, such as tumor overexpression of neuronal-specific β-tubulin isotype III and drug-efflux transporters. In phase II trials, ixabepilone demonstrated proven activity in patients with MBC whose tumors had primary or secondary resistance to taxanes and other agents. Ixabepilone also demonstrated activity in patients with tumor types such as renal-cell cancer and pancreatic cancer that are usually intrinsically insensitive to chemotherapy, including taxanes. To determine the activity of ixabepilone in patients with primary taxane resistance, a retrospective analysis of patient subsets from 2 clinical trials was conducted. Ixabepilone demonstrated clinical activity as monotherapy, and in combination with capecitabine, in patients with MBC who had disease progression as best response to previous taxane therapy. Response rates in patients with primary taxane resistance were comparable to responses observed in total patient populations. The clinical results support the hypothesis that ixabepilone can overcome or circumvent primary mechanisms of resistance to taxanes and other chemotherapeutic agents.     

Ixabepilone: clinical role in metastatic breast cancer

Ixabepilone has shown promising clinical data in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and may be particularly valuable in patients showing progression after treatment with standard chemotherapy. This article reviews the developing clinical profile of ixabepilone in MBC. Unlike taxanes and anthracyclines, ixabepilone has low susceptibility to multiple mechanisms of tumor cell resistance and has activity against tumors resistant to taxanes and/or anthracyclines. In phase II studies, single-agent ixabepilone resulted in objective response rates ranging from 11.5% to 57% in patients who had locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, including patients who were treated as first-line therapy or in resistant patients who had received multiple lines of previous treatment. In two large phase III studies in women who had locally advanced or MBC pretreated with or resistant to taxanes and/or anthracyclines, a combination of ixabepilone plus capecitabine was superior to capecitabine alone in terms of progression-free survival and response rates. The efficacy of ixabepilone has also been shown in subsets, including patients with poor prognosis, the first-line metastatic setting, and in triple-negative disease. Studies are underway to investigate this agent in combination with biologics. A recent three-arm study has shown the activity and tolerability of ixabepilone plus bevacizumab; however, comparative data are not yet available. The toxicity profile of ixabepilone is generally manageable and predictable. The most common adverse events associated with ixabepilone include peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia. Ixabepilone appears to offer a promising alternative chemotherapeutic agent for patients with MBC who progress on various taxanes, anthracyclines, and capecitabine.     

Clinical Development of Ixabepilone and Other Epothilones in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Chemotherapy efficacy in patients with solid tumors is influenced by primary and acquired multidrug resistance (MDR). Epothilones represent a novel class of microtubule inhibitors with lower susceptibility to drug resistance and efficacy in taxane‐resistant tumors. While other epothilones are currently under investigation, ixabepilone is the first epothilone B analogue approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Ixabepilone has been shown to have preclinical activity in chemotherapy‐sensitive and chemotherapy‐resistant tumor models, and synergistic antitumor activity with other chemotherapeutic and targeted agents. Single‐agent ixabepilone has demonstrated clinical activity in multiple solid tumors including advanced breast, lung, prostate, pancreatic, renal cell, and ovarian cancers. Most notably, efficacy has been demonstrated in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing after treatment with anthracyclines and taxanes. A phase III trial in anthracycline‐ and taxane‐resistant MBC showed superior disease control with ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine monotherapy, resulting in its approval. Ixabepilone is also active in chemotherapy‐naïve and taxane‐resistant hormone‐refractory prostate cancer and platinum‐resistant non‐small cell lung cancer. Neutropenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy are the most common adverse events associated with treatment. This review discusses the challenges of MDR and the data that support the use of epothilones in this setting, focusing on ixabepilone.     

Synergistic activity of ixabepilone plus other anticancer agents: preclinical and clinical evidence

Ixabepilone demonstrates marked synergistic activity in combination with capecitabine, which served as the rationale for the evaluation of this combination in the clinic. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine is currently approved for patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing after treatment with an anthracycline and a taxane; approval was based on the results of two phase III trials comparing the combination with capecitabine monotherapy. An array of preclinical studies in multiple solid tumor types show that ixabepilone demonstrates therapeutic synergy with targeted therapies including trastuzumab, bevacizumab, brivanib, and cetuximab; with immune-modulating agents such as anti-CTLA-4 antibody; and with other chemotherapy drugs such as irinotecan and epirubicin. Notably, experiments in several xenograft models show that ixabepilone provides greater antitumor synergism when combined with bevacizumab than either paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab. These preclinical findings provide a foundation for ongoing phase II clinical trials using ixabepilone in combination with trastuzumab or lapatinib in HER2-positive breast cancer; with bevacizumab in breast cancer, endometrial cancer, renal cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); with cetuximab in breast cancer, NSCLC, and pancreatic cancer; and with brivanib, dasatinib, sorafinib, sunitinib, or vorinostat in MBC. Preliminary results from several of these trials suggest that ixabepilone-based combinations have promising anticancer activity.     

Activity of ixabepilone in oestrogen receptor-negative and oestrogen receptor-progesterone receptor-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer

Oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, including oestrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor- and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER/PR/HER2-negative) breast cancer, is more aggressive than ER-positive disease. A major limitation in the treatment of ER-negative disease subtypes is the inherent insensitivity to hormonal agents (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors) that are widely used in the treatment of breast cancer. Thus, therapeutic options for poor prognosis patients with ER-negative breast cancer are limited to a handful of chemotherapeutic agents, and new agents are needed to improve the treatment of this disease.Ixabepilone, a novel epothilone B analogue with low susceptibility to cellular mechanisms that confer resistance to taxanes and other chemotherapeutic agents, has demonstrated potent preclinical antitumour activity in multiple models, including those with primary or acquired drug resistance. This review summarises the results of a prospective subset analysis from a phase III clinical trial evaluating ixabepilone for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), in which efficacy and safety were evaluated in patients with ER-negative and ER/PR/HER2-negative disease.     

Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone, a novel epothilone analogue

The epothilones and their analogues are a new class of anticancer agents derived from the fermentation of myxobacterium Sorangium cellulosum. These compounds have some similarities to taxanes in targeting and stabilizing microtubules, but they also have important differences. Among the epothilone family, ixabepilone has emerged to be a semisynthetic epothilone analogue of interest. Ixabepilone has demonstrated consistent preclinical activity and seems active against various taxane-sensible and taxane-resistant cell lines, including those with overexpression of multidrug resistance and with mutations in the beta-tubulin gene. The interest of this ixabepilone has been confirmed clinically. Phase II clinical studies have demonstrated high activity in patients with taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer and in patients with other chemotherapy-resistant tumor types.     

Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone (BMS-247550), a novel epothilone B analogue

The epothilones are a new class of non-taxane tubulin polymerization agents obtained by natural fermentation of the myxobacteria Sorangium cellulosum. The cytotoxic activities of the epothilones, like those of the taxanes, have been linked to stabilization of microtubules, but they also have important differences. Among the epothilone family, ixabepilone (BMS247550) is a semisynthetic derivative of the natural product epothilone B. Ixabepilone was evaluated in vivo in a panel of human and rodent tumour models, the majority of which were chosen because of their known, well-characterized resistance to paclitaxel, and seems able to overcome the over-expression of multidrug resistance and to be unaffected by mutations in the beta tubulin gene. The interest of ixabepilone was clinically confirmed in clinical studies of phase II which demonstrated a strong activity at the patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to taxanes and in patients suffering of other types of chemoresistant tumors.     

Ixabepilone: a novel antineoplastic agent with low susceptibility to multiple tumor resistance mechanisms

Tumor resistance to chemotherapeutic agents ultimately leads to treatment failure in the majority of cancer patients. The identification of new agents that are less susceptible to mechanisms of tumor resistance could, therefore, bring significant clinical benefits to patients with advanced cancer. One new drug class of great interest in this respect is the epothilones and their analogues, which are microtubule inhibitors with low susceptibility to several mechanisms of drug resistance. Ixabepilone is an analogue of natural epothilone B with activity against a wide range of tumor types, including drug-resistant tumors. This is consistent with the preclinical activity of ixabepilone against human cancer cell lines resistant to taxanes and other agents. Taxane resistance in these cells may be acquired or primary and results from several mechanisms, such as overexpression of multidrug-resistance proteins and the betaIII-tubulin isoform. Ixabepilone has demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy or in combination with capecitabine in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated/resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and has recently been approved for use in resistant/refractory MBC. Other epothilones, such as patupilone, KOS-1584, and ZK-EPO, are also being evaluated in drug-resistant cancers. Ixabepilone represents a new treatment option for MBC patients with cancers resistant to available chemotherapeutic agents.     

Phase I trial of ixabepilone plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with adenocarcinoma of breast or ovary

Background: Ixabepilone is a semisynthetic epothilone B analogue that is active in taxane-resistant cell lines and has shown activity in patients with refractory breast and ovarian cancer. We carried out a phase I trial of ixabepilone plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with advanced taxane-pretreated ovarian and breast cancer.Methods: Patients with recurrent ovarian or breast carcinoma received PLD every 3 or 4 weeks plus five different dose schemas of ixabepilone in cohorts of three to six patients.Results: Thirty patients received a total of 142 treatment cycles of the PLD–ixabepilone combination. The recommended phase II dose and schedule of ixabepilone was 16 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 plus PLD 30 mg/m² given on day 1, repeated every 4 weeks. Hand–foot syndrome and mucositis were dose limiting when both ixabepilone and PLD were given every 3 or 4 weeks. Objective responses were observed in 3 of 13 patients (23%) with breast cancer and 5 of 17 patients (29%) with ovarian cancer.Conclusion: Ixabepilone may be safely combined with PLD, but tolerability is highly dependent upon the scheduling of both agents. This combination demonstrated efficacy in patients with breast and ovarian cancer and merits further evaluation in these settings.     

Proactive Management of Adverse Events Maintains the Clinical Benefit of Ixabepilone

Ixabepilone is a novel microtubule‐stabilizing agent with clinical efficacy in advanced breast cancer, including patients whose disease has progressed on prior anthracyclines and taxanes. The safety profile of single‐agent ixabepilone and combination ixabepilone plus capecitabine therapy is reviewed, outlining the steps to effectively manage and prevent common adverse events. Ixabepilone is generally well tolerated, and importantly, its toxicity profile does not overlap with that of capecitabine. Peripheral sensory neuropathy and neutropenia are the most common toxicities associated with ixabepilone; both can be effectively managed by monitoring patients and then, depending on severity, instituting a treatment delay until recovery and reducing the ixabepilone dose for subsequent treatment cycles. Ixabepilone dose reductions are recommended for most grade 3 events, excluding transient fatigue, arthralgia, and myalgia, whereas treatment discontinuation is recommended for persistent grade 3 neuropathy or any grade 4 nonhematological toxicity. Because ixabepilone exposure is greater in patients with hepatic impairment and those receiving concomitant strong cytochrome P‐450 CYP3A4 inhibitors, dose adjustments and restrictions are recommended according to the degree of hepatic impairment, whether ixabepilone is administered alone or in combination with capecitabine, and whether a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor is being coadministered. Patients should be premedicated with oral H₁ and H₂ antihistamines to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Unlike taxanes, corticosteroid premedication is not required unless a hypersensitivity reaction occurred during a previous cycle or during treatment with another Cremophor‐containing agent. By effectively managing adverse events and taking steps to minimize them, clinicians can ensure that patients derive the maximum benefit from ixabepilone therapy.     

Managing Ixabepilone Adverse Events With Dose Reduction

Ixabepilone is a synthetic analogue of epothilone B approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer in combination with capecitabine for cancer resistant to an anthracycline and a taxane, and as monotherapy for cancer resistant or refractory to anthracyclines, taxanes, and capecitabine. The principal dose-limiting adverse events (AEs) of ixabepilone's standard dose (40 mg/m² administered by 3-hour infusion once every 3 weeks) are peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia, and fatigue. An effective strategy to manage ixabepilone-related AEs is dose reduction by 20% (from 40 to 32 to 25 mg/m²); this does not appear to affect treatment efficacy and enables continuation of treatment after recovery (grade 1 or resolved). When appropriate, treatment can be restarted with a 20% dose reduction (to 32 mg/m²). For heavily pretreated patients, especially those with a low performance status, 32 mg/m² is an appropriate initial dose; the dose of capecitabine should also be lowered by 20%. Weekly ixabepilone (15-20 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days) may have an improved tolerability profile, but prospective studies with a large number of patients are required to determine whether it has therapeutic benefit comparable with the current approved regimen. More information is required on dosage and scheduling of ixabepilone in combination with other agents, including novel targeted therapies.     

Taxanes and capecitabine in combination: rationale and clinical results

The clinical utility of capecitabine as a single agent in metastatic breast cancer has been demonstrated with significant responses seen in women already treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. A phase II study in older women with metastatic breast cancer demonstrated capecitabine to be an effective front-line therapeutic agent. Clinical trials of capecitabine in combination with the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, have been based on the observed upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase (TP) in preclinical studies. This taxane-mediated upregulation is synergistic, time dependent, and persists for up to 10 days. Studies of taxanes administered every 3 weeks with capecitabine have shown favorable antitumor responses and the combination of a taxane with capecitabine was favored over a taxane alone. The day-to-day administration of taxanes and capecitabine led to toxicity concerns, which have hindered their daily use. The administration of taxanes on a weekly schedule has demonstrated a more favorable toxicity profile (i.e., less myelosuppression), and initial studies in combination with capecitabine have demonstrated their utility in various solid tumors. Schedule optimization based on the upregulation of TP may result in a greater therapeutic index, thus allowing for the determination of the most advantageous way of combining these agents.     

Role of cytotoxics in combination with targeted agents

Combining cytotoxics with targeted agents can lead to enhanced efficacy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Cytotoxic/targeted agent combinations approved for the treatment of MBC include trastuzumab plus paclitaxel or docetaxel for the first-line treatment in patients presenting with HER2-positive breast cancer. Furthermore, in HER2-negative disease combining bevacizumab with paclitaxel for the first-line treatment of HER2-negative patients is superior compared to monotherapy with either drug. Lapatinib plus capecitabine recently received a positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) for conditional marketing authorisation in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer following prior therapy with anthracyclines, taxanes and trastuzumab. The novel epothilone ixabepilone is also under investigation in this setting. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic activity in combination with targeted agents including trastuzumab and bevacizumab and early clinical studies have revealed encouraging response rates in combination with trastuzumab and carboplatin in patients with HER2-positive MBC. This article will review recent data on the efficacy of combining cytotoxics with targeted agents for the treatment of MBC.     

Pharmacodynamics of tubulin and tubulin-binding agents: extending their potential beyond taxanes

Chemotherapeutic agents that disrupt the assembly or disassembly of microtubules, including paclitaxel and docetaxel, are among the most commonly prescribed anticancer therapies. However, the utility of taxane-based therapy is limited principally by problems with formulation, slow administration, cumulative neurotoxicity, and resistance in part through induction of P-glycoprotein. The broad-spectrum anticancer activity of taxane therapy has encouraged investigators to identify a class of structurally novel microtubulin-stabilizing agents that could produce comparable outcomes with fewer problems. Preclinical studies indicate that epothilones have a broad spectrum activity in paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer models. Several epothilone analogues have displayed promising antitumor activity in initial clinical trials. Ixabepilone, an epothilone derivative in the later stages of clinical development, has exhibited antitumor activity in breast cancers, with or without previous taxane therapy. The most common adverse events associated with ixabepilone are reversible sensory neuropathy and neutropenia. This review briefly outlines the basic science behind microtubule-targeting agents and examines the preclinical studies of several of these agents in breast cancer models. Also discussed are results from clinical trials of epothilones alone and in combination in patients with breast cancer.