The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastro-oesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND: Increased prevalence of oesophagitis has been reported following eradication of Helicobacter pylori. We hypothesized that H. pylori eradication might increase gastro-oesophageal acid reflux in patients with reflux oesophagitis. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients (13 male, 12 female) with H. pylori infection and reflux oesophagitis grade I (22 patients) or II (three patients) were enrolled; mean age 49.9 (range 33-75) years. Twenty-four hour intra-oesophageal pH recording was performed before and 12 weeks after eradication of H. pylori, which was achieved using bismuth subnitrate suspension 150 mg q.d.s., oxytetracycline 500 mg q.d.s. and metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s. for 10 days. Eradication was confirmed by 14C-urea breath test 12 weeks after completion of treatment. The patients did not receive acid-suppressive medication. RESULTS: All patients had abnormal gastro-oesophageal reflux before anti-H. pylori treatment. After treatment, there was no significant change in the percentage of total time oesophageal pH < 4 (P=0.46) in the 23 patients in whom the infection had been cured. Nine of the cured patients had increased acid exposure, whereas 14 had decreased acid exposure. No significant change in reflux symptom scores was found. There was no relationship between change in acid exposure and symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve weeks after H. pylori eradication there was no consistent change in gastro-oesophageal acid reflux in patients with mild or moderate reflux oesophagitis.     

Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and Helicobacter pylori infection

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Helicobacter pylori infection are common conditions that frequently coexist. Controversy continues regarding the role of H. pylori infection in GERD. The results of some studies suggest that eradication of H. pylori may increase the risk for developing GERD, and some experts have suggested that chronic H. pylori infection may be of benefit. This article reviews the data on H. pylori infection and GERD and its treatment.     

Meta-analysis: the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: The relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and its treatment and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is controversial. AIMS: To establish if H. pylori infection is associated with the presence of GERD and if anti-H. pylori treatment leads to de novo GERD or rebound/exacerbation of GERD. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was made. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated for de novo GERD and rebound/exacerbated GERD after anti-H. pylori therapy in case-control studies and in therapeutic trials. RESULTS: Fourteen case-control studies and 10 clinical trials were included. Among case-control studies, pooled OR for the association between H. pylori negative status and GERD was 1.34 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.55]. Among therapeutic trials, pooled OR for the association anti-H. pylori therapy - GERD was 2.54 (95% CI 1.92-3.37). The OR for de novo GERD was 3.25 (95% CI 2.09-5.33), and for rebound/exacerbated GERD was 2.39 (95% CI 1.75-3.34). Associations were higher among Asian studies than among North American and European studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows significant association between absence of H. pylori infection and GERD symptoms, and a positive association between anti-H. pylori therapy and occurrence of both de novo and rebound/exacerbated GERD. The significance of these associations appears to have been inflated by the effect of single trials and by geographical variations.     

Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with milder gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated a negative relationship between the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). AIM: To study the effects of H. pylori infection on the severity of GERD. METHODS: Ethnic Chinese patients with frequent heartburn and/or endoscopic oesophagitis were studied. Endoscopic examination was performed to assess the severity of oesophagitis (modified Savary-Miller grading) and the presence of hiatus hernia. Biopsies were taken for rapid urease testing and confirmation of Barrett's oesophagus. Risk factors which may affect the severity of oesophagitis (age, sex, smoking, drinking, diabetes mellitus, hiatus hernia, H. pylori status and body mass index) were evaluated by a multiple regression model. The cagA status of H. pylori infected GERD and age-and-sex matched controls were determined by Western blot. Age-and-sex matched non-reflux patients were recruited as controls for comparison. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-five patients with GERD were studied, of whom 77 (34%) were infected with H. pylori. Oesophagitis and Barrett's oesophagus were found in 140 patients (62%) and six patients (3%), respectively. H. pylori infected patients had significantly less severe oesophagitis compared to the uninfected group (P=0.022). All patients with Barrett's oesophagus were uninfected. Factors that predicted severe oesophagitis included age over 60 years (P < 0.001) and hiatus hernia (P < 0.001). H. pylori infection was the only factor that showed a negative correlation with severe oesophagitis (P=0.011). The prevalence of the cagA positive strain in endoscopy-negative GERD, erosive oesophagitis and control subjects was 70, 76 and 78%, respectively (P=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori infection is associated with milder GERD.     

Systematic review: the effect of Helicobacter pylori and its eradication on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with duodenal ulcers or reflux oesophagitis

BACKGROUND: The effect of Helicobacter pylori in provoking or protecting against gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is unclear and studies have given conflicting results. Recent guidelines recommend H. pylori eradication in patients on long-term proton pump inhibitors. AIM: To ascertain the effect of H. pylori eradication on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease outcomes (reflux oesophagitis and heartburn) in patients with duodenal ulcer disease, and to ascertain the effect of H. pylori infection on reflux oesophagitis concerning heartburn, pH, severity, healing and relapse rates. METHODS: A systematic review of electronic databases was undertaken to September 2003. Experts in the field, pharmaceutical companies and journals were contacted about unpublished trials. Studies were reviewed according to predefined eligibility and quality criteria. Twenty-seven studies/trials were included in the systematic review. RESULTS: Study variation rather than therapy-influenced results in relation to the presence or absence of oesophagitis in patients with duodenal ulcer who underwent H. pylori eradication at 6-48 months follow-up. In patients with reflux oesophagitis no obvious differences were discovered in heartburn scores, 24-h pH values, healing and relapse rates between H. pylori-positive and -negative cases. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence to indicate that H. pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer disease provokes reflux oesophagitis or worsens heartburn; (ii) there are insufficient data to draw firm conclusions about the impact of H. pylori in patients with reflux oesophagitis.     

Symposium: Helicobacter pylori and clinical risks--focus on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Helicobacter pylori is a gastric pathogen that is a major cause of peptic ulcer disease, has a role in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and is associated with gastric cancer. Yet, in a large proportion of the human population, H. pylori infection has no apparent adverse clinical consequences. Furthermore, recent research suggests that H. pylori may even confer protection against gastroesophageal reflux disease. The conflicting evidence surrounding H. pylori infection was discussed at a sponsored symposium in Helsinki, introduced by Professor P. Malfertheiner, with papers presented by Dr H. J. O'Connor, Professor R. M. Genta, Dr P. Unge and Professor A. T. R. Axon. Emerging epidemiological and retrospective evidence suggests that the presence of H. pylori infection may provide some protection against gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there is other evidence that shows no benefit of H. pylori for the protection of the oesophagus. It was felt that prospective, multicentre studies are needed to explore the H. pylori-gastroesophageal disease relationship further, to avoid confusing potential benefits with known risks. Following the symposium, a discussion on the relative risks and benefits for H. pylori eradication was provided by Professor Axon and Professor Blaser. Eradication of H. pylori has been recommended in a series of management guidelines issued by consensus groups. However, accurate estimates of the relative risks and benefits of H. pylori infection in the general population, as well as in specific patient groups, is essential in order to develop a management strategy.     

Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection and its eradication on nutrition

AIMS: To investigate the effects of Helicobacter pylori infection and eradication on nutrition. METHODS: The body weight, height, blood pressure, gastric juice pH and fasting serum levels of glucose, total protein, albumin, total cholesterol and triglyceride were measured in H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative subjects, and the effect of eradication of H. pylori on these parameters was determined. The development of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease after treatment was also examined. Eight patients underwent a pancreatic function test before and after H. pylori eradication therapy. RESULTS: The incidence of hypoproteinaemia in H. pylori-positive subjects was significantly higher than that in H. pylori-negative subjects. After eradication of H. pylori, the gastric juice pH values were significantly decreased, and the body weight and serum levels of total cholesterol, total protein and albumin were significantly increased. The incidence of hyperlipidaemia significantly increased and that of hypoproteinaemia significantly decreased in the group with eradication. Pancreatic function improved significantly after eradication of H. pylori. No significant changes in these parameters were observed in the group without eradication. Obese patients had a higher risk of the development of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease after eradication of H. pylori infection. CONCLUSIONS: The eradication of H. pylori appears to improve some nutritional parameters.     

Clinical trial: prolonged beneficial effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on dyspepsia consultations – the Bristol Helicobacter Project

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 394–400

Summary

Background Chronic infection of the stomach with Helicobacter pylori is widespread throughout the world and is the major cause of peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. Short‐term benefit results from community programmes to eradicate the infection, but there is little information on cumulative long‐term benefit. Aim To determine whether a community programme of screening for and eradication of H. pylori infection produces further benefit after an initial 2‐year period, as judged by a reduction in GP consultations for dyspepsia. Methods A total of 1517 people aged 20–59 years, who were registered with seven general practices in Frenchay Health District, Bristol, had a positive ¹³C‐urea breath test for H. pylori infection and were entered into a randomized double‐blind trial of H. pylori eradication therapy. After 2 years, we found a 35% reduction in GP consultations for dyspepsia (previously reported). In this extension to the study, we analysed dyspepsia consultations between two and 7 years after treatment. Results Between two and 7 years after treatment, 81/764 (10.6%) of participants randomized to receive active treatment consulted for dyspepsia, compared with 106/753 (14.1%) of those who received placebo, a 25% reduction, odds ratio 0.84 (0.71, 1.00), P = 0.042. Conclusions Eradication of H. pylori infection in the community gives cumulative long‐term benefit, with a continued reduction in the development of dyspepsia severe enough to require a consultation with a general practitioner up to at least 7 years. The cost savings resulting from this aspect of a community H. pylori eradication programme, in addition to the other theoretical benefits, make such programmes worthy of serious consideration, particularly in populations with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection.     

Rapid eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background/aims: Current Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease usually involves a 2-week course of either a bismuth preparation or omeprazole in combination with antibiotics. We have studied a shorter, 7-day course of treatment to assess efficacy and tolerability. Methods: Four hundred and thirty-six patients, in three non-randomized groups, received omeprazole (40 mg mane), amoxycillin (500 mg t.d.s.) and metronidazole (400 mg t.d.s.): 308 patients received the triple combination for 14 days; 80 patients were treated for 7 days; and 48 patients received omeprazole and amoxycillin for 7 days but metronidazole for only 5 days. Results: Helicobacter pylori was eradicated in 89.5%, 91.1% and 87.5%, respectively (98.3%, 92.9% and 100% of metronidazole-sensitive isolates and 75.6% and 88.2% of metronidazole-resistant isolates in the first two groups). Side effects were significantly more frequent in patients who received 14 days (49%) compared with 7 days of treatment (33%); only 8/308 and 1/128 patients, respectively, failed to complete the course. Conclusions: On the basis of efficacy, tolerability and cost, we conclude that a 7-day course of the omeprazole (40 mg mane), amoxycillin (500 mg t.d.s.) plus metronidazole (400 mg t.d.s.) combination is effective therapy for the eradication of H. pylori.     

Review article: Helicobacter pylori and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-clinical implications and management

A significant proportion of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have Helicobacter pylori infection, but it is unclear whether or not H. pylori should be treated in this clinical setting. The aim of this review was to critically assess the relationship between H. pylori and GERD and its potential implications for the management of GERD. Data for this review were gathered from the following sources up to April 1998-the biomedical database MEDLINE, a detailed review of medical journals, and a review of abstracts submitted to relevant international meetings. On average, 40% of GERD patients carry H. pylori infection, with a reported infection prevalence ranging from 16% to 88%. To date, there has been no reported controlled trial of effective H. pylori therapy in GERD. GERD has been reported to develop de novo following the cure of H. pylori in peptic ulcer disease. In the presence of H. pylori, proton pump inhibitor therapy appears to accelerate the development of atrophic corpus gastritis, a potentially precancerous condition. Conversely, proton pump inhibitor therapy seems to become less effective after cure of H. pylori. The mechanisms underlying these important contrasting phenomena are poorly understood. The relationship between H. pylori and GERD is complex, and it is difficult to give definitive guidelines on the management of H. pylori infection in GERD. Controlled trials of H. pylori therapy in GERD are urgently needed, as well as further long-term data on both the natural history of gastric histopathological changes in the H. pylori-positive GERD patient treated with proton pump inhibitors, and the impact of H. pylori status on the clinical efficacy of antisecretory therapy. Pending these data, it is perhaps advisable to advocate cure of H. pylori in young patients with proton pump inhibitor-dependent GERD who, in the absence of anti-reflux surgery, are faced with the likelihood of long-term medical therapy.     

根除幽门螺杆菌治疗胃食管反流病的研究

目的；探讨根除幽门螺杆菌（HP）治疗胃食管反流病的效果。方法：选取经胃镜诊断为胃食管反流病（Ⅰ～Ⅱ级）并经快速尿素酶测定伴有HP感染的患者53例。口服丽珠得乐1粒每日4次加克拉霉素0．25g每日2次加甲硝唑0．4g每日2次，连续14天根除HP。分别在根除HP前及根除后1个月，对患者进行24小时食管内pH值监测、食管内压力测定及快速尿素酶试验检测HP。结果：40例患者完成了研究。9例患者症状消失，31例患者仍有食管炎症状。28例患者的食管炎症状评分降低。而12例患者无变化（P〈0．05）。根除HP后1个月，食管pH值小于4的时间占总时间的百分比，在22例患者有增加，18例患者有减少。患者食管24小时pH值的其他参数和食管下端括约肌的平均静息压力无明显变化。结论：胃食管反流病患者在根除HP后1个月，其胃食管反流没有得到有效控制，但一些与反流相关的症状却有明显改善。