Effect of changing from concomitant timolol pilocarpine to bimatoprost monotherapy on ocular blood flow and IOP in primary chronic angle closure glaucoma.

The aim of the present prospective masked study was to assess the effect of bimatoprost monotherapy on ocular blood flow and intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes of primary chronic angle closure glaucoma patients already on concomitant timolol and pilocarpine. Thirty two patients of bilateral primary chronic angle closure glaucoma (PCACG) on topical timolol 0.5% twice a day and pilocarpine 2% three times daily were switched over to bimatoprost 0.03% once daily in both eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) and pulsatile ocular blood flow (POBF) were recorded before and after starting bimatoprost and were followed up every four weeks for three months. Bimatoprost had statistically significant (p < 0.05) mean IOP reduction from 19.3 +/- 6.6 to 13.5 +/- 4.5 mmHg (30.5%) and there was improvement from 858 +/- 260 to 1261 +/- 321 microL/min (46.8%) in mean pulsatile ocular blood flow (p < 0.05). Conjunctival hyperemia (32%) was the most common adverse effect of bimatoprost. Bimatoprost 0.03% monotherapy improved ocular blood flow and provided a better diurnal IOP control than concomitant timolol-pilocarpine in eyes with primary chronic angle closure glaucoma and was found to be well tolerated.     

Short-term effects of bimatoprost in glaucoma patients from an outpatient clinic.

PURPOSE: A drug utilization trial was performed to investigate acute versus short-term effects after switching or adding bimatoprost in open-angle glaucoma patients over a 3- month observation period. METHODS: One (1) eye was randomly chosen from 47 glaucomatous patients (abnormal visual field and/or abnormal optic nerve and intraocular pressure (IOP) above 21 mmHg without treatment). Only patients who did not reach the target IOP with their ongoing treatment were recruited in this study. IOP was measured at baseline, after 1 hour, and 2 hours from the first instillation and after 1 week, 1, and 3 months of treatment. RESULTS: The IOP before bimatoprost administration was 20.16+/-3.6 mmHg (mean+/-standard deviation). There was no statistically significant decrease of IOP after 1 hour (mean IOP, 19.96+/-4.25 mmHg) and after 2 hours (mean IOP, 17.73+/-3.24 mmHg). Statistically significant (p<0.001) decreases after 1 week (mean IOP, 16.48+/-2.9 mmHg), after 1 month (mean IOP, 16.48+/-2.9 mmHg) and after 3 months (mean IOP, 16.15+/-2.7 mmHg) were found. CONCLUSION: The results suggested that bimatroprost had a significant acute effect on IOP in monotherapy, while no significant effect was found when the therapy was switched or added. The effect for primary open-angle glaucoma was very evident. There was no specific side effect attributable to combining bimatoprost with any of the treatments in use.     

The effects of prostaglandin analogues on the blood aqueous barrier and corneal thickness of phakic patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of topical latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost on the blood-aqueous barrier and central corneal thickness (CCT) of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, masked-observer, crossover clinical trial. METHODS: A total of 34 phakic patients with POAG or OHT with no previous history of intraocular surgery or uveitis completed the study. Patients were randomized to use latanoprost 0.005%, travoprost 0.004%, or bimatoprost 0.03% once daily (2000 hours) for 1 month, followed by a washout period of 4 weeks between each drug. Aqueous flare was measured with a laser flare metre. CCT was calculated as the average of five measurements using ultrasound pachymetry. All measurements were performed by a masked observer (1000 h). RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between baseline mean IOP, mean CCT, and mean flare values among the groups. There was no statistically significant increase in mean flare values from baseline in all groups (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between mean flare values among the groups (P>0.05). All medications significantly reduced the mean IOP from baseline (P<0.0001). IOP reduction obtained with travoprost (7.3+/-3.8 mmHg) was significantly higher than that obtained with latanoprost (4.7+/-4.2 mmHg) (P=0.01). A statistically significant reduction in mean CCT (0.6+/-1.3%) from baseline was observed when patients instilled bimatoprost (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost had no statistically significant effect on the blood-aqueous barrier of phakic patients with POAG or OHT. Bimatoprost may be associated with a clinically irrelevant reduction in mean CCT.     

Efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03 percent in untreated glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients: results from a large community-based clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure- (IOP-) lowering efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% (Lumigan, Allergan, Inc.) monotherapy in the treatment of patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension not currently using ocular hypotensives. METHODS: Open-label, community-based, multicenter evaluation. Patients (n = 6767) who, according to their physicians, required IOP lowering were prescribed bimatoprost for 2 months. Subgroup analyses of the results, stratified by treatment history and use of concomitant medications, were performed. This report focuses on the subgroup of patients that was not being treated with antiglaucoma medications at baseline (n = 1946, 29%). All of these patients were placed on bimatoprost monotherapy. RESULTS: The mean IOP at the untreated baseline was 23.8 mmHg. Bimatoprost provided a mean IOP reduction of 7.5 mmHg (30%, p < 0.001) from baseline after 2 months of monotherapy. Further, bimatoprost allowed patients to achieve low target pressures. For example, 41.5% of patients achieved target IOPs of < or =15 mmHg after 2 months of bimatoprost monotherapy, and 75.8% of patients reached IOPs of < or =18 mmHg. The most commonly reported adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia (7.9%). CONCLUSION: Bimatoprost monotherapy was well tolerated and reduced IOP by an average of 30% in a large population of untreated patients.     

Comparative evaluation of bimatoprost monotherapy in primary chronic angle closure and primary open angle glaucoma eyes: a three-year study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% monotherapy in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) versus primary chronic angle closure glaucoma (PCACG) eyes. METHODS: A total of 55 consecutive primary adult glaucoma patients on bimatoprost monotherapy were prospectively evaluated in this 3-year, open-labeled, uncontrolled study. The primary outcome was the evaluation of a difference in the response to therapy of POAG eyes, as compared to PCACG eyes over a follow-up of 3 years. RESULTS: In the POAG group, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at the 36-month followup was found to be increased by 2.10 (+/-3.90) mmHg (confidence interval [CI], 0.975-4.185), compared to the mean IOP at 1 month (P = 0.047). In the PCACG group, the mean IOP at the 36-month follow-up was increased by 3.66) (+/- 3.34) mmHg (CI, 6.241-1.092), compared to the mean IOP at 1 month (P = 0.011). This upward drift in IOP was higher in the PCACG group, compared to the POAG group, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.54). Patients with POAG and PCACG showed a 50% and 40% chance of having an IOP of <18 mmHg with bimatoprost monotherapy (P = 0.23), respectively, at the 3-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that bimatoprost 0.03% monotherapy significantly lowers IOP in both POAG and PCACG eyes over a period of 3 years, though its efficacy appeared to decrease over time, to a similar extent, in both groups.     

The effect of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost on circadian variation of intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost given in the evening over the 24-hour curve in newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma patients. METHODS: This 8-week, randomized, parallel group, masked evaluator study compared the efficacy of once daily administration of latanoprost 0.005%, bimatoprost 0.03%, and travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solutions. After enrollment at baseline, 48 patients were randomized to 3 treatment groups: latanoprost (n=17), bimatoprost (n=16), and travoprost (n=15). At baseline and 8 weeks of therapy, masked evaluators measured intraocular pressure (IOP) at 8 AM, 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM, 8 PM, 11 PM, and 3 AM. RESULTS: Baseline mean IOP levels were similar across the groups. By week 8, reductions were observed in all 3 groups (P<0.001 for each). Travoprost-treated patients' IOP levels were reduced 8.7 and 8.1 mm Hg at 8 and 10 AM, respectively. Latanoprost-treated patients experienced 4.8 and 5.3 mm Hg reductions, whereas bimatoprost-treated patients experienced 5.5 and 4.9 mm Hg reductions at these time points. The amount of IOP reduction seen at 8 and 10 AM in travoprost group was significantly higher when compared with latanoprost and bimatoprost-treated group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost were comparable in their ability to reduce IOP in open-angle glaucoma patients. On the basis of our data, the IOP reduction of these drugs is indistinguishable within statistical parameters.     

Bimatoprost in the treatment of ocular hypertension and chronic glaucoma

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of bimatoprost in an outpatient glaucoma practice and to correlate the responsiveness to this treatment with the central corneal thickness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our retrospective analysis included 55 consecutive patients (mean age, 66 years). Bimatoprost was administered in monotherapy in 32 patients and in combined treatment in 23. Mean follow-up was 5.5 months. In bilateral treatments (33/55 patients), only one eye (with the more severe defect and/or the higher IOP) was included in the analysis. The patients were considered as responders to bimatoprost when the observed reduction of IOP was > or = 20% and/or at least 3 mmHg compared with the pretreatment IOP. The mean central corneal thickness (CCT) was extrapolated from five consecutive measurements with the ultrasonic pachymeter Pachette. RESULTS: Overall, the mean IOP was reduced from a pretreatment value of 21.1 mmHg to 17.3 mmHg at the last visit (mean IOP decrease, 3.6 mmHg, or 17%) (p < 0.05). Except for four patients (7.3%) who discontinued bimatoprost secondary to local or systemic adverse effects, ocular tolerance of bimatoprost was excellent in 62%. Moderate conjunctival hyperemia was present in 18%. The mean IOP reduction was 19% in monotherapy and 15% in combined treatments. Concomitantly, the percentage of responders was slightly higher in patients only receiving bimatoprost than in patients receiving bimatoprost associated with other medication (s). In monotherapy, bimatoprost induced a further IOP decrease of 12% compared with a previous association of two medications that did not include a prostaglandin (10 patients). In the 20 patients in whom bimatoprost had replaced another prostaglandin, a further mean IOP reduction of 11% was observed. The frequency of distribution of the responders to bimatoprost was not correlated with CCT (chi2, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the limits of this study, our results suggested that bimatoprost was effective and well tolerated in most patients. The decrease in IOP and responsiveness to treatment appeared to be slightly higher in monotherapy than in combined treatments, equivalent to a combination of two medications without prostaglandin and equivalent to or slightly higher than other prostaglandins. The degree of responsiveness did not seem to be correlated with CCT.     

Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in Greece

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the fixed combination of bimatoprost 0.03% and timolol 0.5% (BTFC) in patients in Greece with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) whose previous therapy provided insufficient lowering of intraocular pressure (IOP). METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-interventional, observational study of the use of BTFC in clinical practice was conducted at 41 sites in Greece. The primary endpoint was the reduction in IOP from baseline at study end, approximately 12wk after initiation of BTFC therapy. RESULTS: A total of 785 eligible patients were enrolled in the study and 97.6% completed the study. The mean±SD IOP reduction from baseline at 12wk after initiation of BTFC was 6.3±2.8 mm Hg (n=764; P<0.001). In patients (n=680) who replaced their previous IOP-lowering monotherapy (a single drug, or a fixed combination of 2 drugs in a single ophthalmic drop) with once-daily BTFC, the mean±SD IOP reduction from baseline at 12wk was 6.2±2.8 mm Hg (P<0.001). IOP was reduced from baseline in 99.2% of patients, and 58.0% of patients reached or exceeded their target IOP. Substantial mean IOP reductions were observed regardless of the previous therapy. BTFC was well tolerated, with 96.0% of patients who completed the study rating the tolerability of BTFC as “good” or “very good.” Adverse events were reported in 8.3% of patients; only 0.6% of patients discontinued the study due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice in Greece, BTFC is well tolerated and effectively lower the IOP in patients with POAG or OHT who requires additional IOP lowering on their previous therapy.     

Comparison of the effects of latanoprost and bimatoprost on intraocular pressure in chronic angle-closure glaucoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of latanoprost and bimatoprost as primary therapy in patients with chronic angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) after peripheral iridotomy. METHODS: Eighty-two (82) consecutive CACG patients with an IOP greater than 19 mmHg after a peripheral iridotomy were recruited. CACG was defined as chronic elevated IOP, glaucomatous optic neuropathy, and a corresponding visual field defect in eyes with occludable angle and peripheral anterior synechiae on gonioscopy. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups based on daily treatment with either latanoprost 0.005% or bimatoprost 0.03% in the evening for 12 weeks. The IOP was measured at 9 AM and 4 PM on the same day at baseline and also at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Between-group differences in mean diurnal IOP and IOP reduction were analyzed. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, mean IOP for both the latanoprost and bimatoprost groups was significantly reduced when compared to the baseline value (21.6 +/- 1.9 to 16.4 +/- 2.5 mmHg and 22.1 +/- 2.0 to 16.9 +/- 2.4 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.001 for both). There was no significant difference in IOP reduction between the two treatment groups (P = 0.40). At 4 and 8 weeks, the IOP changes from baseline were statistically significant at both times for both drugs (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both latanoprost and bimatoprost significantly reduced IOP in CACG patients who were inadequately treated by laser peripheral iridotomy.     

Comparison of the ocular hypotensive effects of bimatoprost and timolol-dorzolamide combination in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 6-month study

PURPOSE: To compare the ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of topical bimatoprost and timolol-dorzolamide combination in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension during 6 months of treatment. METHODS: A sample of 65 patients with a diagnosis of POAG or ocular hypertension were randomized to receive either bimatoprost 0.03% once daily or timolol-dorzolamide combination twice daily. Study visits occurred at baseline and after 2 weeks and 1, 3 and 6 months of therapy. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were performed at 12.00 hours at all study visits and also at 08.00 hours and 16.00 hours at baseline and 6-month visits. At each visit, local and systemic side-effects that occurred during the treatment period were recorded. Student's t-test was used to compare the differences between IOP values. RESULTS: Differences in IOP between the bimatoprost and timolol-dorzolamide groups were statistically insignificant at all study visits (p > 0.05). In the bimatoprost-treated group, the IOP reduction was 6.2 +/- 1.8 mmHg, whereas it was 6.5 +/- 2.3 mmHg in the timolol-dorzolamide group after 6 months of treatment. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: The IOP-lowering efficacies of bimatoprost and timolol-dorzolamide combination were similar over a 6-month follow-up. Both bimatoprost and the timolol-dorzolamide combination were well tolerated. Bimatoprost can be used as a longterm monotherapy agent in the treatment of POAG and ocular hypertension.     

A 3-month randomized controlled trial of bimatoprost (LUMIGAN) versus combined timolol and dorzolamide (Cosopt) in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical bimatoprost (LUMIGAN; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) once daily with that of topical combined timolol and dorzolamide (Cosopt; Merck and Co, Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ) twice daily. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-seven patients with a diagnosis of glaucoma or ocular hypertension and inadequate control of intraocular pressure (IOP) after at least 2 weeks of topical timolol maleate 0.5% monotherapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive bimatoprost 0.03% once daily (n = 90) or combined timolol 0.5% and dorzolamide 2% twice daily (n = 87) over a 3-month period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure, the primary end point, was measured at 8 AM and 10 AM at baseline, week 1, and months 1, 2, and 3, and also at 4 PM and 8 PM at baseline and month 3. RESULTS: Bimatoprost provided significantly greater IOP lowering compared with combined timolol and dorzolamide. At the 8 AM measurements, bimatoprost lowered mean IOP 6.8 mmHg to 7.6 mmHg from baseline, whereas combined timolol and dorzolamide lowered mean IOP 4.4 to 5.0 mmHg from baseline (P<0.001). At the last follow-up, patients had better diurnal IOP control with bimatoprost than combined timolol and dorzolamide. At 8 AM at the 3-month visit, the percentages of patients achieving IOPs of 相似文献   

Diurnal IOP control with bimatoprost versus latanoprost in exfoliative glaucoma: a crossover, observer-masked, three-centre study

AIM: To evaluate the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) control and safety of bimatoprost versus latanoprost in exfoliative glaucoma (XFG). METHODS: One eye of 129 consecutive patients with XFG (mean (SD) age 66.5 (8.3) years) was included in this prospective, observer-masked, three-centre, crossover comparison. After a 4-6 week medicine-free period patients were randomised to bimatoprost or latanoprost monotherapy for 3 months. Patients were then switched to the opposite treatment for another 3 months. At the end of the washout and the treatment periods diurnal IOP was measured at 0800, 1300, and 1800. RESULTS: At baseline the IOP (mean (SD)) was 28.0 (4.0), 26.9 (3.6), and 25.9 (3.6) mm Hg, at the three time points, respectively. Both treatments significantly reduced mean diurnal IOP at month 3. Mean diurnal IOP was 26.9 (3.5) mm Hg at baseline, 17.6 (3.3) mm Hg with bimatoprost, and 18.6 (3.6) mm Hg with latanoprost (p<0.0001). Furthermore, lower IOP values were obtained with bimatoprost at all time points (17.9 (3.4), 17.3 (3.3), and 17.6 (3.5) mm Hg, respectively) compared with latanoprost (18.7 (3.6), 18.5 (3.6), and 18.6 (4.1) mm Hg, respectively). The corresponding mean differences (0.8, 1.1, and 1.0 mm Hg, respectively) were all significant (p<0.001 for each comparison). Significantly more patients with XFG obtained a target diurnal IOP <17 mm Hg with bimatoprost than with latanoprost, 55/123 (45%) v 34/123 (28%); (p = 0.001), and significantly fewer patients were non-responders with bimatoprost than with latanoprost (5 v 13, p = 0.021). More patients reported at least one adverse event with bimatoprost than with latanoprost (58 v 41 at 3 months; p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: This crossover study suggests that better diurnal IOP control is obtained with bimatoprost than with latanoprost in patients with XFG.     

Changes in optic nerve head blood flow after therapeutic intraocular pressure reduction in glaucoma patients and ocular hypertensives

PURPOSE: To detect and quantify changes in optic nerve head (ONH) and peripapillary retinal blood flow by scanning laser Doppler flowmetry (SLDF) in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) after therapeutic intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, self-controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients with OAG and 20 patients with OHT with clinical indications for therapeutic IOP reduction were prospectively enrolled. INTERVENTION: IOP reduction was achieved by medical, laser, or surgical therapy. All patients had IOP reductions more than 20% and a minimum of 4 weeks follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood flow measurements were performed by SLDF analysis software (version 3.3) using Heidelberg Retina Flowmeter images. Statistical evaluations were performed on both groups using a two-tailed distribution paired t test. RESULTS: Twenty patients with OAG had a mean IOP reduction of 37% after treatment. In these patients, mean (+/- standard deviation) rim blood flow increased by 67% (from 158 +/- 79 arbitrary units to 264 +/- 127 arbitrary units, P = 0.001), whereas mean temporal peripapillary retinal flow decreased by 7.4% (P = 0.24), and mean nasal peripapillary retinal flow increased by 0.3% (P = 0.96). Twenty OHT patients had a mean IOP reduction of 33% after treatment. In contrast to the OAG group, neither the mean rim blood flow (7.5% increase from 277 +/- 158 arbitrary units to 298 +/- 140 arbitrary units, P = 0.41) nor the mean temporal (P = 0.35) or nasal (P = 0.88) peripapillary retinal flow changed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: For a similar percentage of IOP reduction, OAG patients had a statistically significant improvement of blood flow in the neuroretinal rim of the ONH, whereas OHT patients did not demonstrate such a change. Peripapillary retinal blood flow, expected to be affected less in glaucoma, remained stable in both groups. In addition to indicating a response to therapy in OAG patients, the reported changes in rim perfusion suggest that ONH autoregulation may be defective in OAG while intact in OHT.     

Effectiveness and safety of brimonidine as adjunctive therapy for patients with elevated intraocular pressure in a large, open-label community trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of brimonidine when used in combination with one or more glaucoma medications in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of a multicenter, 2-month, open-label, prospective, clinical trial in which 2,335 patients received brimonidine as monotherapy, replacement therapy, or combination therapy. Patients who received brimonidine as combination therapy (n = 554) were examined in the current analysis. Efficacy was determined by the reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline before the addition of brimonidine. Safety and tolerability parameters included adverse events and quality-of-life measures (e.g., ocular comfort, energy level, breathing ability, night vision). RESULTS: Addition of brimonidine to preexisting regimens resulted in an overall mean additional reduction in IOP of 17.9% (4.26 mm Hg) at month 2 (P < 0.001). Significant additional IOP lowering was provided by brimonidine in combination with each preexisting regimen evaluated (P < or = 0.061). When brimonidine was added to monotherapy with a nonselective beta-blocker, the mean additional IOP reduction was 15.5% (3.61 mm Hg, P < 0.001). Addition of brimonidine to latanoprost monotherapy provided a 32.2% (5.89 mm Hg) mean additional IOP reduction (P < 0.001). Addition of brimonidine to combination regimens that included latanoprost provided additional mean decreases in LOP ranging from 15.5% (3.63 mm Hg, P < 0.002) to 20.1% (6.62 mm Hg, P < 0.001). All quality-of-life parameters remained high or improved during the study. Mild to moderate adverse events were reported in 5.23% of patients (29 of 552); 98.1% of physicians rated brimonidine adjunctive therapy as good or excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Brimonidine, when added to existing glaucoma regimens, safely and effectively lowered IOP in this community-based trial.     

Efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% in reducing intraocular pressure in patients with 360° synechial angle-closure glaucoma: a preliminary study

Context:

Peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS; synechiae anterior to functional trabecular meshwork) formation in primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) hampers access to uveoscleral outflow. Thus, the role of bimatoprost in such patients with 360° synechiae was evaluated.

Aims:

To assess efficacy and safety profile of bimatoprost 0.03% in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in 360° synechial angle-closure glaucoma patients.

Settings and Design:

This was a prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative, selective analysis, single-center pilot study.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 23 eyes of 20 Indian chronic angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) patients with IOP greater than 21 mmHg, 360° PAS and no visual potential in the study eye underwent detailed eye examination. Baseline IOP was measured and YAG peripheral iridotomy was performed for complete angle-closure reconfirmation. Bimatoprost 0.03% was administered for 8 weeks as once-daily evening dose. IOP reduction within treatment group was determined with “paired t-test”.

Results:

The mean reduction in IOP from baseline to 8 weeks of bimatoprost therapy was 15.3 ± 9.5 mmHg (P < 0.001). The most commonly observed adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia (35%). Bimatoprost was well tolerated in the study.

Conclusions:

In this study, exclusively involving patients with 360° synechial angle-closure glaucoma and no visual potential, bimatoprost 0.03% treatment demonstrated a statistically significant IOP reduction. Hence, it can be inferred that bimatoprost 0.03% is an efficacious treatment modality in this subgroup of patients for reducing IOP.     

Intraocular pressure and progression in exfoliative eyes with ocular hypertension or glaucoma

PURPOSE: This retrospective study was conducted in exfoliative eyes in order to study the influence of IOP and other possible factors on the conversion from ocular hypertension (OHT) to glaucoma and progression of glaucoma. METHODS: 139 patients with exfoliation OHT or glaucoma with exfoliation syndrome were included (mean follow-up 5.2 +/- 3.6 years). The effects of age, gender, weighted mean IOP, maximum IOP, stage of glaucoma at the first visit, refraction, glaucoma medication, and interventions on the hazard of progression were studied by multivariate survival analysis. RESULTS: Conversion from OHT to glaucoma or progression of glaucoma was detected in 63 eyes (45.3%). A significant association with progression was found for age (relative risk 1.042; p-value 0.043), weighted mean IOP (1.076; <0.001), and stage of glaucoma (1.436; <0.001). History of trabeculectomy (0.360; 0.002) related to a decreased risk. CONCLUSION: The risk of conversion from OHT to glaucoma and progression of glaucoma increased in exfoliative eyes with severity of stage of glaucoma, weighted mean IOP, and the age of the patient. A history of trabeculectomy was related to decreased risk of progression.     

Comparative study of three prostaglandin analogues in the treatment of newly diagnosed cases of ocular hypertension,open‐angle and normal tension glaucoma

Background: To compare the efficacy and tolerance of three prostaglandin analogues, bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost in patients with previously untreated open‐angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Methods: Prospective randomized single (investigator) masked comparative clinical trial at the Taunton and Somerset NHS Hospital, Taunton, UK. Newly diagnosed, treatment naïve glaucoma/ocular hypertension patients were recruited. Patients were randomized into three groups to receive one of the three prostaglandin analogues. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured before starting treatment and after 2 and 6 months of treatment. The IOP reduction and the tolerance profile of each drug were compared. The data were analysed on the basis of intention to treat, using analysis of covariance comparing IOP in the three groups at 2 and 6 months, adjusting for baseline IOP. Tolerance levels were compared using Kruskal–Wallis test. Results: Of the 122 patients, 40 patients were given bimatoprost, 42 received latanoprost and 40 had travoprost. At 2 months, there was a significant difference between the three treatment groups (P = 0.013) with bimatoprost achieving a greater reduction in IOP than the other two drops. However, at 6 months, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.13). There was no significant difference in the tolerance profile. Conclusion: All the three topical prostaglandin analogues are effective at lowering IOP, but bimatoprost was found to be most effective in the initial phase of the trial, and there was no statistically significant difference in the efficacy, among the three prostaglandin analogue eye drops after 6 months of treatment.     

Intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% and travoprost 0.004% in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

AIM: To evaluate the efficacies of bimatoprost and travoprost for lowering of intraocular pressure (IOP) for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension. METHODS: Prospective, randomised, investigator-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial. After completing a washout of all glaucoma drugs, patients (n = 157) were randomised to bimatoprost or travoprost for 6 months. Visits were at baseline, 1 week, and 1, 3 and 6 months. IOP was measured at 09:00 h at each visit and also at 13:00 and 16:00 h at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: No significant between-group differences were observed in IOP at baseline, at 09:00, 13:00 or 16:00 h (p> or =0.741). After 6 months, both drugs significantly reduced IOP at every time point (p< or =0.001). After 6 months, mean IOP reduction at 09:00 h was 7.1 mm Hg (27.9%) with bimatoprost (n = 76) and 5.7 mm Hg (23.3%) with travoprost (n = 81; p = 0.014). At 13:00 h, mean IOP reduction was 5.9 mm Hg with bimatoprost (25.3%) and 5.2 mm Hg (22.4%) with travoprost (p = 0.213). At 16:00 h, the mean IOP reduction was 5.3 mm Hg (22.5%) with bimatoprost and 4.5 mm Hg (18.9%; p = 0.207) with travoprost. Both study drugs were well tolerated, with ocular redness the most commonly reported adverse event in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bimatoprost provided greater mean IOP reductions than travoprost.     

Intraocular pressure abnormalities associated with central and hemicentral retinal vein occlusion

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of ocular hypertension (OHT) and glaucoma in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and hemi-CRVO (HCRVO) and of the fall in intraocular pressure (IOP) secondary to CRVO/HCRVO. DESIGN: Nonrandomized comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We investigated 674 consecutive patients who were initially seen with unilateral CRVO (n = 548) and HCRVO (n = 126) at their onset, with a normal fellow eye. The fellow uninvolved eye in each patient acted as a control. Central retinal vein occlusion and HCRVO were categorized into nonischemic and ischemic. At all visits, patients had a detailed ocular history, as well as a thorough bilateral ocular evaluation, including IOP recording with a Goldmann applanation tonometer; when the diagnosis of OHT or glaucoma was initially uncertain, the 24-hour diurnal IOP was recorded. The observed prevalence rates of OHT and glaucoma among patients with CRVO and HCRVO were compared with those in the general population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence of OHT and glaucoma, and of ocular hypotension secondary to CRVO/HCRVO. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of glaucoma was 9.9% and of OHT 16.2%. The prevalence of glaucoma/OHT was found to be significantly (P<0.0001) higher in patients with CRVO and HCRVO than in the general population. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with glaucoma/OHT among the various types of CRVO/HCRVO (P = 0.156). Forty-eight percent of all patients had lower IOP (>/==" BORDER="0">2 mmHg) in the CRVO/HCRVO eye than in the fellow (uninvolved) eye at their initial evaluation. The prevalence of ocular hypotension was significantly (P<0.0001) higher in patients with glaucoma/OHT not on ocular hypotensive therapy than in patients without glaucoma. Among the patients without glaucoma, the prevalence of ocular hypotension differed significantly among the various types of CRVO/HCRVO (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Central retinal vein occlusion and HCRVO have a significant association with glaucoma and OHT and with a subsequent fall in IOP in the involved eye. Few patients with CRVO/HCRVO have high IOP in the involved eye, although many of them do have it in the fellow uninvolved eye. It is important to exclude glaucoma/OHT in the fellow eye of any patient with CRVO/HCRVO; if present, elevated IOP should be treated to reduce the risk of that eye developing (1) CRVO/HCRVO and (2) glaucomatous damage. There may be no benefit to prescribing IOP-lowering drops for involved eyes whose IOP is already normal.     

Efficacy and safety of bimatoprost in patients with uncontrolled glaucoma as alternative to filtration surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimatoprost 0.03% as an alternative to filtration surgery in patients with uncontrolled glaucoma. DESIGN: Interventional study. METHODS: A total of 83 consecutive patients (83 eyes) awaiting glaucoma surgery were enrolled in eight ophthalmic centers. Reasons for listing were inadequate intraocular pressure (IOP) control despite medical therapy and documented progression of visual field loss. All patients discontinued the previous treatment and were switched to bimatoprost 0.03% QD (one drop at 9 pm). The primary efficacy outcome was a 20% IOP reduction from baseline at each timepoint. IOP was measured at day 7, day 30, day 60, and day 90 of treatment; less than 20% IOP reduction was considered as a failure. RESULTS: An IOP reduction of at least 20% was achieved in 74 patients (89.1%) after 7 days and in 64 patients (86.5%) after 30 days. Sixty-two patients (74.6%) maintained IOP readings 20% lower than baseline after 60 and 90 days. In these patients, visual field indices improved in 8 eyes (13%), and remained unchanged in 54 eyes (87%). Ocular side effects were conjunctival injection (15.6%), burning sensation (9.6%), foreign body sensation (4.8%), and eyelash growth (2.4%). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study shows that bimatoprost 0.03% could represent a useful therapeutic tool that might defer filtration surgery.