Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 741–750)

The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website ( www.bjs.co.uk ). All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited and published in the Journal. Letters must be no more than 250 words in length. Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection

BACKGROUND: Postoperative morbidity is high after pancreatic head resections. Data about risk factors are controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection and to assess whether the complication rate changed during the study period. METHODS: Data of 301 patients undergoing pancreatic head resection were recorded prospectively. Risk factors were assessed by multivariate analysis. The first and second part of the study period were compared. RESULTS: Mortality was 3%. Overall and surgery-related complications occurred in 42% and 28%, respectively. Independent risk factors for postoperative morbidity were impaired renal function (odds ratio [OR] 2.7), absence of preoperative biliary drainage (OR 1.9), and resection of other organs (OR 3.2). Complication rate, duration of surgery, amount of blood transfused, and length of hospital stay decreased during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing hospital experience decreased complication rates. Patients with risk factors should be considered for transferal to specialized centers.     

Meta-analysis of modified Blumgart anastomosis and interrupted transpancreatic suture in pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the main cause of surgery related mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Various pancreatoenteric anastomosis methods have been developed to reduce the POPF rate. However, the optimum choice has not been clarified.A literature search is performed in electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, Embase, CNKI and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing modified Blumgart anastomosis with interrupted transpancreatic suture are included in this meta-analysis. Grade B/C POPF, overall POPF rate and overall sever complication rate (Clavien-Dindo classification IIIa or more) are measured as primary outcomes. Revman 5.3 was used to perform the analysis.Five retrospective comparative studies and 1 randomized controlled trial with a total number of 1409 patients are included in our analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that modified Blumgart anastomosis is associated with lower rate of grade B/C POPF [Odds Ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI),0.32 (0.12–0.84); P = 0.02] and intra-abdominal abscess [OR 95%CI, 0.43 (0.29–0.65); P < 0.01] comparing with interrupted transpancreatic suture. However, this procedure could not reduce overall POPF [OR 95%CI,0.70 (0.34–1.44); P = 0.34] and overall sever complication rate [OR 95%CI,0.91 (0.48–1.72); P = 0.77].At current level of evidence, modified Blumgart anastomosis is superior to interrupted transpancreatic suture in terms of grade B/C POPF and intra-abdominal abscess. However, high-grade evidence will be necessary to confirm these results.     

External stenting of pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis and pancreatic duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Pancreatic fistula is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. External drainage of pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis with a stent is used to reduce the rate of pancreatic fistula. This study compares the rates of pancreatic fistula between external stent drainage versus no-stent drainage for pancreaticojejunal anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy. A total of 53 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for various benign and malignant pathologies were included in the study. An external stent was inserted across the anastomosis to drain the pancreatic duct in 26 patients and 27 patients received no stent. The primary end point was pancreatic fistula. All surgeries were done by a single surgeon with expertise in hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery at a single institute. The two groups were comparable in demographic data, underlying pathologies, presenting complaints, presence of comorbid illnesses and proportion of patients with preoperative biliary drainage, pancreatic consistency and duct diameter. The pancreatic fistula rates were similar in both the groups (11.5 vs. 14.8?%, P?=?0.725). The morbidity and surgical re-exploration rate were statistically not significant between the two groups (65.4 vs. 51.9?%, P?=?0.318 and 11.5 vs. 7.4?%, P?=?0.60). Postoperative stay was also similar with a mean of 14?days in both the groups (P?=?0.66). The mortality rate was statistically not significant in the two groups (3.8 vs. 7.4?%, P?=?0.575). External drainage of pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis and the pancreatic duct with a stent does not decrease the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.     

Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic resections can be performed with great safety. However, the morbidity rate is reported to be 40-60 per cent with a high prevalence of pancreatic complications. The aim of this study was to analyse complications after pancreatic head resection, with particular attention to morbidity and pancreatic fistula. METHODS: From November 1993 to May 1999, perioperative and postoperative data from 331 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic head resection were recorded prospectively. Data were analysed and grouped according to the procedure performed: classic Whipple resection, pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) or duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR). RESULTS: Pancreatic head resection had a mortality rate of 2.1 per cent; the difference in mortality rate between the three groups (0.9-3.0 per cent) was not significant. Total and local morbidity rates were 38.4 and 28 per cent respectively. DPPHR had a lower morbidity, both local and systemic, than pancreatoduodenectomy. The prevalence of pancreatic fistula was 2.1 per cent in 331 patients, and was not dependent on the procedure or the aetiology of the disease. Reoperations were performed in 3.9 per cent of patients, predominantly for bleeding and non-pancreatic fistula. None of the patients with pancreatic fistula required reoperation or died in the postoperative course. CONCLUSION: A standardized technique and a continuing effort to improve perioperative management may be responsible for low mortality and surgical morbidity rates after pancreatic head resection. Pancreatic complications occur with Whipple, PPPD and DPPHR procedures with a similar prevalence. Pancreatic fistula no longer seems to be a major problem after pancreatic head resection and rarely necessitates surgical treatment.     

The Frey procedure: local resection of pancreatic head combined with lateral pancreaticojejunostomy.

Management of chronic pancreatitis is mainly palliative. Most patients with chronic pancreatitis require surgical evaluation and intervention when there is suspicion of pancreatic malignancy, evidence of intractable pain, or development of pancreatitis-related local complications. The ideal operation for chronic pancreatitis, therefore, should be designed to exclude the existence of malignancy, provide long-lasting pain relief, and correct the local complications. It should be as simple and safe as possible and should preserve the remaining endocrine and exocrine functions of the pancreas.     

A duodenum-preserving and bile duct-preserving total pancreatic head resection with associated pancreatic duct-to-duct anastomosis

A duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection technique was first reported in 1980, but the indications have been limited to benign pancreatic disease as it involves a subtotal pancreatic head resection. In 1988 we detailed a duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection (DPTPHR) technique. This procedure involved a total pancreatic head resection and as such expanded the indications for this approach to include tumorigenic masses. The original method involved closure of the proximal pancreatic duct and an anastomosis of the pancreatic duct of the distal pancreas to a newly created small hole in the duodenum (we termed this a "pancreatoduodenostomy"). Our current technique involves a duct-to-duct anastomosis of the proximal pancreatic duct and the distal pancreas to better preserve anatomic structure. DPTPHR was performed in 26 patients from 1988 to 2002, including 12 cases of DPTPHR with pancreatoduodenostomy and 14 cases of DPTPHR with pancreatic duct-to-duct anastomosis. No differences were observed between the two methods with respect to operative time or blood loss during surgery. Postoperatively, there was one case of cholecystitis and one case of pancreatitis in a patient who underwent a pancreatoduodenostomy; both of these patients were treated conservatively with curative intent. No complications were observed in the group undergoing duct-to-duct anastomosis. The advantage of duct-to-duct anastomosis is that the pancreatic head is totally resected, thus allowing removal of neoplastic disease such as an intraductal papillary mucinous tumor and also therapy for chronic pancreatitis. A key benefit of this procedure is that sphincter function of the duodenal papilla is preserved permitting drainage of pancreatic/bile juice into the duodenum, preserving a more physiologic state than is the case after a pancreatoduodenostomy. Supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (63480311) from the Ministries of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.     

Triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy with resection of jejunal serosa decreased pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background

Pancreatic fistula (PF) is one of the most common complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We described a new method of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) developed by combining triple-layer duct-to-mucosa PJ with resection of jejunal serosa, which was named as modified layer-to-layer PJ (MLLPJ). The aim of the present study was to observe whether the new technique would effectively reduce the PF rate in comparison with two-layer duct-to-mucosa PJ (TLPJ).

Methods

Data on 184 consecutive patients who underwent the two methods of PJ after standard PD between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2013 were collected retrospectively from a prospective database. The primary endpoint was the PF rate. The risk factors of PF were investigated by using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

A total of 88 patients received TLPJ and 96 underwent MLLPJ. Rate of PF for the entire cohort was 8.2%. There were 11 fistulas (12.5%) in the TLPJ group and four fistulas (4.2%) in the MLLPJ group (P = 0.039). Body mass index, pancreatic texture, pancreatic duct diameter, and methods of PJ anastomosis had significant effects on the formation of PF on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that pancreatic duct diameter ≤3 mm and TLPJ were the significant risk factors of PF.

Conclusions

MLLPJ effectively reduces the PF rate after PD in comparison with TLPJ. Results confirm increased PF rates in patients with pancreatic duct diameter ≤3 mm compared with pancreatic duct diameter >3 mm.     

捆绑式胰肠吻合术在重度胰腺损伤中的应用

目的 回顾性总结捆绑式胰肠吻合术在Ⅲ级以上胰腺损伤中的应用价值和治疗经验.方法 对1999年3月～2007年3月我院收治的18例Ⅲ级以上胰腺损伤患者实行捆绑式胰空肠Roux-Y吻合术.结果 全组术后无一例发生胰瘘等并发症,较多地保留了胰腺的组织和功能.结论 捆绑式胰肠吻合术在Ⅲ级以上胰腺损伤的治疗过程中,不仅可以预防胰瘘的发生,而且可以缩短手术时间,保留较多的胰腺组织和功能.     

Long-term metabolic results after pancreatic resection for severe chronic pancreatitis

HYPOTHESIS: Type and extent of pancreatic resection have little effect on long-term development of diabetes in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) considering the distinctive relentless progression of the disease. DESIGN: A case series of consecutive patients included over a 10-year period. Median duration of follow-up was 6.3 years. Follow-up of survivors was at least 5 years (median, 7.7 years). SETTING: A referral center in a university hospital. PATIENTS: All 68 patients (57 men and 11 women) who underwent pancreatic resection for CP during the study period were included. Median age of patients was 44 years. Complete follow-up was obtained for all patients. INTERVENTIONS: Resection procedures included 35 proximal pancreatoduodenectomies (51%), 31 distal pancreatectomies (46%), and 2 total pancreatoduodenectomies (3%). Four patients (6%) received autologous intraportal islet transplants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time from surgery to introduction of insulin therapy or death, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and pain control. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (75%) had experienced acute episodes of CP 5 months to 13 years before resection. Perioperative mortality and morbidity were 1.5% and 21.0%, respectively. Satisfactory long-term pain control was achieved in 61 patients (90%). Actuarial survival was 54% at 10 years and was significantly worse for patients with alcoholic CP (48% vs 78%; P =.04). Diabetes-free survival was 26% at 10 years, with no difference according to type or extent of pancreatic resection. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic resection for severe CP is safe and has good long-term results on pain control but is performed late in the course of disease. Earlier resection and islet of Langerhans autotransplantation should be considered for patients who are inexorably heading toward diabetes, regardless of type and extent of resection performed.     

Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection and pancreatic head resection with segmental duodenostomy

A duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) was first reported by Beger et al. in 1980. However, its application has been limited to chronic pancreatitis because of it is a subtotal pancreatic head resection. In 1990, we reported duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection (DPTPHR) in 26 cases. This opened the way for total pancreatic head resection, expanding the application of this approach to tumorigenic morbidities such as intraductal papillary mucinous tumor (IMPT), other benign tumors, and small pancreatic cancers. On the other hand, Nakao et al. reported pancreatic head resection with segmental duodenectomy (PHRSD) as an alternative pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy technique in 24 cases. Hirata et al. also reported this technique as a new pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenostomy with increased vessel preservation. When performing DPTPHR, the surgeon should ensure adequate duodenal blood supply. Avoidance of duodenal ischemia is very important in this operation, and thus it is necessary to maintain blood flow in the posterior pancreatoduodenal artery and to preserve the mesoduodenal vessels. Postoperative pancreatic functional tests reveal that DPTPHR is superior to PPPD, including PHSRD, because the entire duodenum and duodenal integrity is very important for postoperative pancreatic function.     

保留十二指肠的胰头切除术

自1935年Whipple首次报告了胰十二指肠切除术以来,该手术已成为治疗胰头肿瘤及炎性假瘤病变的标准术式.然而,Whipple手术是一种创伤极大的高危手术,并发症发生率高达20%～30%,死亡率近5%,且由于广泛器官切除及多个消化道吻合,易对患者消化功能造成不良影响,降低患者术后生存质量.对胰头良性和低恶性肿瘤及慢性胰腺炎患者实施该手术,切除范围过大,代价太高.     

保留十二指肠的胰头近全切除术治疗胰头部良性肿瘤

目的:探讨保留十二指肠的胰头近全切除术治疗胰头部良性肿瘤的价值。
方法:回顾性分析2004年1月—2009年12月4例施行保留十二指肠的胰头近全切除术患者的临床资料,均保留了胃肠道的完整性、肝外胆道、胆囊和Oddi括约肌的功能,仅在壶腹周围和胆管后方保留有少量胰腺组织。
结果:病理证实1例为导管内乳头状黏液瘤,1例为内分泌肿瘤,2例为实性假乳头状瘤。术后2例发生胰瘘,经过非手术治疗治愈。围手术期无死亡。随访8~20个月,均未发现复发征象。
结论:对于胰头部良性肿瘤,特别是摘除困难的,保留十二指肠的胰头近全切除术是合理的选择。

     

保留十二指肠胰头切除术后并发症的防治体会

目的 探讨保留十二指肠胰头切除术后并发症的防治措施.方法 回顾性分析2003-2008年期间武汉协和医院胰腺中心行保留十二指肠胰头切除术56例病人的临床诊疗经过.结果 术后发生并发症13例(23.2%),包括胰瘘7例(12.5%),十二指肠瘘2例(5.4%);胆瘘1例(2.8%);腹膜后积液和感染2例(5.4%);腹腔大出血1例(2.8%).消化道瘘经支持治疗和维持通畅引流等治疗而痊愈,腹膜后积液和感染病人在B超引导下置管引流治愈,腹腔大出血者急诊选择性腹腔动脉造影显示胃十二指肠动脉分支破裂出血,经明胶海绵和不锈钢圈栓塞后治愈.结论 胰瘘、十二指肠瘘、胆瘘、腹腔感染和出血等是DPPHR术后主要并发症,严格掌握手术适应证,术中仔细操作,尽量保留十二指肠的血液供应是减少DPPHR术后并发症和提高手术成功率的关键,一旦出现并发症应采用正确的治疗方法 .     

Evidence-based pancreatic head resection for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE: To review the current status of pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis using evidence-based methodology. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Despite improved results of pancreatoduodenectomy over the recent years, the reputation of the Whipple procedure and its main modifications has remained poor. In addition, the current status of newer modifications of standard pancreatoduodenectomy is still under debate. METHODS: Medline search and manual cross-referencing were performed to identify all relevant articles for classification and analysis according to their quality of evidence. The search was limited to articles published between 1990 and 2001. RESULTS: The mortality rate of pancreatoduodenectomy has declined to less than 5% for chronic pancreatitis and 3% to 8% for pancreatic cancer. In contrast, overall morbidity rates remain high, ranging between 20% and 70%. Delayed gastric emptying represents almost half of all complications. The overall 5-year survival rate for patients with pancreatic cancer remains poor, ranging between 5% and 15%, with a median survival of 13 to 17 months. Mortality and morbidity are not related to the type of pancreatoduodenectomy; however, patients with pancreatic cancer tend to be at increased risk for complications. Extended lymph node dissection and portal vein resection can be performed with similar mortality and morbidity rates as standard procedures, but without apparent survival benefits in the long term. Major relief of pain is achieved in 70% to 100% of patients with chronic pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatoduodenectomy and its main modifications are safe and effective treatment modalities, especially in experienced centers with a high patient volume. For chronic pancreatitis, surgical resection provides major relief of pain and thus increased quality of life. Overall survival for patients with pancreatic cancer is determined predominantly by the pathology within the resected specimen.     

Management of delayed visceral arterial bleeding after pancreatic head resection

Despite low mortality, postoperative complications are still relatively frequent after pancreatic head resection. The occurrence of delayed visceral arterial bleeding from erosions or pseudoaneurysms of branches of the celiac trunk or from the stump of the gastroduodenal artery is a rare but life-threatening complication and is probably underreported in the literature. During a 10-year period, we diagnosed and treated 12 patients (three referred from other hospitals) with severe visceral arterial bleeding, presenting 7 to 85 days after pancreatic head resection. Clinical presentation was gastrointestinal bleeding (seven patients) or abdominal bleeding (five patients). The bleeding source was identified by angiography in 10 of the 12 cases. Definitive bleeding control was achieved by angiography in six of the 12 patients (stent 2, coiling 4), or by surgery in five patients. None of the six patients with successful angiographic intervention required further surgery for bleeding control. One patient died due to hemorrhage before bleeding was controlled. Median transfusion requirement was 12.5 (range 3–37) units. Of five patients with interventional or surgical occlusion of the common hepatic artery, three developed hepatic abscesses and two had complications of the hepaticojejunostomy. One of those five patients died four months after definitive bleeding control because of recurrent hepatic abscesses. All other patients eventually recovered completely. We conclude that delayed arterial bleeding from visceral arteries is a rare but life-threatening complication after pancreatic head resection. Angiographic stenting with preservation of hepatic blood flow, if technically possible, represents the best treatment option. Presented at the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Chicago, Illinois, May 14–18, 2005 (poster presentation).