Sequential Stenting for Extensive Malignant Airway Stenosis

Purpose: Malignant airway stenosis extending from the bronchial bifurcation to the lower lobar orifice was treated with airway stenting. We herein examine the effectiveness of airway stenting for extensive malignant airway stenosis.Methods: Twelve patients with extensive malignant airway stenosis underwent placement of a silicone Dumon Y stent (Novatech, La Ciotat, France) at the tracheal bifurcation and a metallic Spiral Z-stent (Medico’s Hirata, Osaka, Japan) at either distal side of the Y stent. We retrospectively analyzed the therapeutic efficacy of the sequential placement of these silicone and metallic stents in these 12 patients.Results: The primary disease was lung cancer in eight patients, breast cancer in two patients, tracheal cancer in one patient, and thyroid cancer in one patient. The median survival period after airway stent placement was 46 days. The Hugh–Jones classification and performance status improved in nine patients after airway stenting. One patient had prolonged hemoptysis and died of respiratory tract hemorrhage 15 days after the treatment.Conclusion: Because the initial disease was advanced and aggressive, the prognosis after sequential airway stent placement was significantly poor. However, because respiratory distress decreased after the treatment in most patients, this treatment may be acceptable for selected patients with extensive malignant airway stenosis.     

Stenting for airway obstruction in the carinal region

Background. Recent progress on airway stents has provided sufficient airway patency for patients with airway obstruction; however, when the stenosis exists in the carinal zone, establishing an excellent airway condition is still troublesome because of the anatomic structure.

Methods. We treated 15 patients with severe tracheobronchial stenosis involving a carinal bifurcation region, using several types of stenting devices (long T-tube, T-Y tube, wire reinforced Y tracheostomal tube, Freitag Dynamic stent [Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany], and covered metallic stent). All patients had advanced inoperable tumors (lung cancer, n = 6; esophageal cancer, n = 3; thyroid cancer, n = 3; mediastinal tumor, n = 3).

Results. All but 2 patients had immediate relief of respiratory symptoms. One patient died of respiratory failure caused by pulmonary lymphatic spread 3 days after Dynamic stent insertion. In 1 patient with severe left main bronchial stenosis due to lung cancer, effective palliation was not achieved by insertion of a covered metallic stent because of its insufficient expansion against the stenosis. Mean survival after successful stenting was 4.3 months (range, 1 to 15 months). There were no complications directly attributable to the stents.

Conclusions. As evidenced by the clinical effectiveness, airway stenting for inoperable tumor is valuable in such patients. Choosing a stent that will fully cover the lesion and allow sufficient tolerance against compression is important to successful stenting. Benefits such as ease of phonation and stent maintenance should also be considered.     

气管内支架治疗气管良性狭窄11例

目的：探讨气管内支架治疗气管良性狭窄的疗效。方法：１９８２年２月至１９９８年８月间应用气管内支架治疗１１例气管良性狭窄,其中Ｙ形硅胶管支架置入术４例,Ｓｔｒｅｃｋｅｒ金属网状支架置入术１例。结果：随访４￣１８０个月。８例临床效果良好,其中４例拔除内支架。并发症包括肉芽组织形成３例,其中２例更换支架;围术期咳痰困难５例。结论：不同病因良性气和狭窄在选择治疗方法时应严格按照治疗原则,对气管壁全层皆已成     

Temporary tracheobronchial stenting in malignant lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Temporary stenting is a new strategy in the treatment of malignant airway stenoses. Patients receive stents as primary palliation followed by tumor-specific therapy in order to reduce the stenosis and subsequently remove the stent. METHODS: We investigated this strategy of temporary airway stenting in 5 consecutive patients with malignant lymphoma (Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, n = 3; Hodgkin's lymphoma, n = 2) who presented with severe dyspnoea. Nine stents (six Strecker, three Dumon stents) were implanted into the trachea or main bronchi. After stenting, patients underwent tumor-specific therapy (chemotherapy, n = 4; percutaneous radiotherapy, n = 1). RESULTS: Clinical improvement of dyspnoea and stridor was observed in each patient after stent implantation. In 4 patients (80%), stents could easily be removed after successful tumor-specific therapy, which led to reduction of stenosis after a mean interval of 26 days (14 to 52 days). One patient died during chemotherapy 6 days after stenting. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that temporary stenting is a valuable strategy in chemo- and radiosensitive malignancies, as it ameliorates the patients' respiratory condition until tumor-specific therapy is effective, and prevents poststenotic complications. It integrates stent implantation in a multi-therapy concept.     

Airway stenting for malignant and benign tracheobronchial stenosis

BACKGROUND: Patients with benign and malignant central airway obstruction suffer from disabling dyspnea, obstructive pneumonia, and impending suffocation. Therapeutic bronchoscopy provides immediate and gratifying palliation. Airway stenting is the principal modality used to manage intrinsic tracheobronchial pathology and extrinsic airway compression. This report provides the details of the indications, techniques, and results of airway stenting in our practice. METHODS: University of Washington patients undergoing bronchoscopy with stent placement or revision from May 1992 through December 2001 were extracted from a prospective patient database. Details of the stent procedure were obtained from the medical records and office charts. Early outcomes were assessed by patient symptoms and signs, and late outcomes were assessed by patient follow-up visits, follow-up bronchoscopy, or discussions, or a combination of these with the patient, patient's family, or referring physician. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three patients underwent 309 stent procedures of which 67% were for malignant disease. Eighty-two percent required urgent or emergent intervention, and 77% had compromise of more than three fourths of the airway lumen. Eighty-seven percent of stents placed were silicone rubber and 15% of patients required multiple stents to achieve airway palliation. Significant improvement was achieved in 94% of patients but required multiple endoscopies to maintain improvement in 41%. There was no stent-related mortality and only one major complication required surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Airway stenting provides prompt and durable palliation in unresectable patients with central airway obstruction. Frequently multiple stents and multiple procedures will be necessary to maintain a satisfactory airway.     

Postoperative airway stenosis and stent therapy in carinal reconstruction for lung cancer.

A 48-year-old male had adenocarcinoma of the right upper lung lobe that invaded the lower trachea. The right upper lobe, the carina, and 5 rings of the lower trachea were resected. The carina was reconstructed using end-to-end anastomosis between the trachea and right intermediate bronchus, with the left main bronchus anastomosed to the side wall of the intermediate bronchus. Two months after surgery, the right intermediate bronchus developed bronchomalacia and the tracheal anastomosis granulatory stenosis. Bronchomalacia was treated with 2 expandable metallic stents, and granulatory stenosis with a Dumon stent. Although the silicone stent successfully dilated the granulatory stenosis, the metallic stents caused delayed glanulatory stenosis. We concluded that a metallic stent is not desirable for treating postreconstructive airway stenosis including bronchomalacia, whereas a Dumon stent may be effective.     

Postoperative airway stenosis and stent therapy in carinal reconstruction for lung cancer

A 48-year-old male had adenocarcinoma of the right upper lung lobe that invaded the lower trachea. The right upper lobe, the carina, and 5 rings of the lower trachea were resected. The carina was reconstructed using end-to-end anastomosis between the trachea and right intermediate bronchus, with the left main bronchus anastomosed to the side wall of the intermediate bronchus. Two months after surgery, the right intermediate bronchus developed bronchomalacia and the tracheal anastomosis granulatory stenosis. Bronchomalacia was treated with 2 expandable metallic stents, and granulatory stenosis with a Dumon stent. Although the silicone stent successfully dilated the granulatory stenosis, the metallic stents caused delayed glanulatory stenosis. We concluded that a metallic stent is not desirable for treating postreconstructive airway stenosis including bronchomalacia, whereas a Dumon stent may be effective.     

全身麻醉下气管支架植入术治疗恶性气管狭窄

目的评价全身麻醉下气管支架植入术治疗恶性气管狭窄的疗效。方法选择因恶性肿瘤致气管狭窄、中、重度呼吸困难患者17例,行全身麻醉及气管插管,于DSA监视下经气管套管植入镍钛记忆合金支架。结果全部病例均成功植入支架,呼吸困难症状立即得到改善。随访3～24个月,支架无移位,气管通畅,患者无明显疼痛及异物感。结论全身麻醉下气管支架植入术治疗恶性气管狭窄安全、快捷、有效,患者痛苦小,可为后续治疗提供条件。     

Airway stenting.

Various airway pathologies may result in central airway obstruction. For patients who have benign and malignant disease, definitive surgical correction by tracheobronchial resection and reconstruction is preferred. Numerous patients, however, have unresectable airway lesions owing to the extent of disease or to medical or surgical contraindications. These patients can be palliated by several endoscopic strategies, including dilatation, core out of tumor, laser resection, endobronchial brachytherapy, or photodynamic therapy. Airway stenting with silicone or expandable metal stents provides reliable and durable palliation in 80% to 95% of properly selected patients. The major advantages of silicone stents are the ease of customization, repositioning, and removal, with the major drawbacks being stent migration or stent obstruction. Expandable metal stents have the advantage of ease of insertion, conformation to the airway, low inner-to-outer diameter ratio, and stent stability. These advantages, however, are offset by (1) the development of tumor ingrowth or of granulation at the end of the stent or through the interstices of the stent and (2) the difficulty or impossibility of stent repositioning or removal once it has been seated completely within the airway. Management of the patient who has central airway obstruction requires a thorough knowledge and consideration of the surgical and endoscopic management options and, usually, a multidisciplinary approach, with experienced thoracic surgical consultation to evaluate the potential for definitive surgical correction. The interventional bronchoscopist must consider the spectrum of endoscopic therapeutics fully. Most patients benefit from combining strategies in a flexible algorithm directed at optimizing patient outcomes. The benefits and risks of airway stenting must be considered in comparison with the other options for airway palliation. In refractory strictures, rapidly recurrent tumor, or extrinsic compression, endobronchial stenting likely will be necessary to achieve durable palliation of airway obstruction. The short- and long-term implications of airway stenting, including the complications of silicone versus expandable metal stents, should be considered thoroughly, while the physician bases treatment or procedure decisions on individual patient anatomy and expected natural history.     

Stenting of central airways

Tracheobronchial stenosis causes severe symptoms such as stridor or dyspnea. Patients who experience these symptoms with inoperable lesions require treatment for palliation of symptoms. In our institution, airway stent placements were performed in 88 patients. The clinical results of stenting for stenosis of the central airways are satisfactory for improvement of the quality of life. Insertion of airway stents and esophageal tubes could improve dysphagia and dyspnea in patients with esophagotracheal fistulas. Recently, several types of prostheses have become available for stenting of airways and each stent has specific features. Therefore it is important for effective and safe stenting to select the type of stent suitable for the condition of each patient.     

Secondary Carina and Lobar Bronchi Stenting in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer: Is It Worth the Effort? A Clinical Experience

Background: The lobar airway stenting remains an endoscopic procedure not well standardized in patients with locally advanced lung cancer disease. The goal of this study was to evaluate technical feasibility, clinical outcome, and complications of different stents in patients with malignant lesions involving lobar bronchi, primary and secondary carina.Methods: Between November 2008 and October 2013, we retrospectively analyzed 146 patients with benign and malignant tracheobronchial stenosis who underwent airway stent insertion below main carina and main bronchi.Results: In all, 170 airway stenting procedures were performed on 146 patients. In all, 51 of them with malignant peripheral airway stenosis underwent stents placement below main carina. In all but one patient, the deployment of stents was successful with improvement of symptoms. The chest radiograph after the procedure detected the lung re-expansion in 29 of 51 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 123 days ± 157. Complications observed included stent migration, tumor overgrowth, infections, granulation tissue formation, and obstruction due to tenacious secretions. Longer survival was observed in patients who received additional treatment after airway stenting compared to those who did not (p <0.01).Conclusions: Stenting of lobar bronchi and primary or secondary carina is technically feasible, effective, and acceptably safe.     

The role of silicone stents in the treatment of cicatricial tracheal stenoses

OBJECTIVE: Tracheal stenting for cicatricial stenoses is reserved for patients whose lesions are deemed inoperable for local or general reasons. The aim of our study was to verify the long-term results of silicone tracheal stents in such a clinical setting. METHODS: Clinical data of 45 patients treated by tracheal silicone stents, between 1987 and 1999, were reviewed. All patients had highly symptomatic cicatricial stenoses; they were selected for stenting rather than for surgery because of local and general conditions. This series has been divided in two groups according to the purpose of stenting: bridge to surgery or definitive treatment. Follow-up ranged between 12 and 83 months. Twenty-seven patients received a Montgomery T tube (Hood Laboratories, Pembroke, Mass), 16 a Dumon stent (Novatech, Plan de Gras, France), and 2 a Dynamic stent (Rusch, Kernen, Germany). RESULTS: No procedure-related mortality was observed. Nine patients underwent curative resection and reconstruction after a variable stenting period; one had a recurrent stenosis and was treated for palliation with a T tube. Tracheal stenting was performed for palliation as a definitive treatment in 37 patients. Among this group, 11 patients died of unrelated causes at a median of 10 months after the endoscopic treatment. The stent was permanently removed in 10 after a median interval of 32 months (range 9-70 months); in 4 others, symptomatic recurrence of the stenosis was observed within 6 weeks of stent removal. None of the patients successfully decannulated had a completely normal tracheal lumen but all remained asymptomatic because the residual stenosis was mild or well tolerated for concomitant limitation of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with a silicone stent was safe and well tolerated in cicatricial tracheal stenoses. This procedure can be considered as a bridge to curative surgery or as a definitive treatment. The latter, generally performed for palliation, may provide satisfactory therapeutic results in selected patients, even in the presence of severe circumferential stenoses.     

Airway Simulation to Guide Stent Placement for Tracheobronchial Obstruction in Lung Cancer

Background. To effectively palliate large airway obstruction in advanced unresectable lung cancer (stage IIIB or IV), we developed an airway imaging technique to guide selective endobronchial metallic stent placement.

Methods. Fourteen consecutive patients with severe dyspnea (American Thoracic Society grade 4) had a combination of fiberoptic bronchoscopy, chest roentgenography, computed tomographic scanning, helical computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction, and intraluminal bronchography with selective bronchial guidewire placement under fluoroscopy to visually reconstruct and simulate the abnormal airway before and during stent placement. Wallstent or Gianturco intraluminal stents were used alone or in combination (up to five stents) to establish patency of the distal trachea and the major bronchi.

Results. All 14 patients had successful deployment with initial relief of airway stenosis (>75% predicted diameter). No procedural complications were noted. However, technical problems included stent foreshortening and imprecision of placement, misinterpretation of bronchography (mucous versus tumor), and airway maintenance during manipulation. Length of stay attributable to the procedure averaged 4 days. Stent placement initially improved the dyspnea score in 7 of 14 patients. Five of 14 died in less than 1 month, with the remainder alive at up to 8 months’ follow-up. Of those surviving more than 1 month, the Karnofsky score improved in 4 and was unchanged in 5, with 2 dependent (Karnofsky score <50), 3 functional (Karnofsky score, 50 to 70), and 4 active (Karnofsky score >70).

Conclusions. A protocol combining helical computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction, bronchography, and bronchoscopy allows accurate assessment of malignant airway obstruction to facilitate intralumenal stent placement for relief of stenosis. Patient selection to favor effective palliation and cost effectiveness has yet to be defined.     

Video-assisted interventional bronchoscopy

Background: Major airway obstruction due to benign or malignant etiology is not uncommon and is always distressing. Intraluminal stenting has been shown to be a safe and effective approach for symptomatic relief in selected patients based on the European and North American experience. Methods: We reviewed our experience in Hong Kong on airway stenting over a 19-month period. Results: From February 1994 to August 1995, 33 silicone stents (Dumon stent, Cometh, Marseille, France) were placed in 23 patients (20 males, three females with mean age 61.4 years, range from 26 to 81). Eighteen stents were placed in the trachea, nine in the left main stem, five in the right main stem, and one Y-stent over the carina. Twelve patients had esophageal carcinoma involving the airway, seven had bronchial carcinoma, one had metastatic carcinoma, and three had benign strictures (of which two were due to tuberculosis). There was no procedural related mortality. Stent migration occurred in four patients (17%) and required stent change. Symptoms were improved in all patients as documented by the visual analogue scale. Conclusion: Our experience represents the ``stentable' diseases seen in Hong Kong, where carcinoma of the esophagus (and tuberculosis) remains prevalent. We conclude that intraluminal stenting remains a safe and effective approach in selected patients with critical airway stenosis. Complications, however, do exist and should be realized by the operator, the patients, and their families. Received: 4 September 1996/Accepted: 3 August 1996     

Gianturco self-expanding metallic stents in treatment of tracheobronchial stenosis after single lung and heart and lung transplantation

Three patients with recurrent bronchial stenosis following single lung transplant (SLTx), and one patient with tracheal stenosis following heart-lung transplantation (HLTx), not responding to repeated dilatations (3 patients) and prolonged use of silastic stents (patient with tracheal stenosis), have been treated by the endoscopic insertion of Gianturco self-expanding metallic stents under fluoroscopic control. The stent resulted in immediate improvement in respiratory function in all four patients. One patient (SLTx) had early bronchial re-stenosis due to growth of granulation tissue within the stent which was successfully treated by cryotherapy. In one patient (HLTx), a left lower lobe bronchial stenosis developed 14 months after tracheal stenting. The metallic stent appears to be a promising device in the management of recurrent or resistant bronchial stenosis following SLTx or tracheal stenosis after HLTx.     

Airway stents in management of tracheal stenosis: have we improved?

BACKGROUND: Airway stenting is an alternative approach for relieving airway stenosis when lesions are inappropriate for single-stage reconstruction. The aim of this study was to present our experience using airway stent in the management of patients with tracheal stenosis. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 45 patients who underwent airway stenting during a 2-year period. Between June 2002 and August 2004, 45 patients underwent rigid bronchoscopy for tracheal stenosis using an Ultraflex stent (Microvasive; Boston Scientific, Boston, MA, USA), Hood stent (Hood Laboratories, Pembroke, MA, USA) and Montgomery T-tube (Boston Medical, Westborough, MA, USA). Clinical improvement, intraoperative, early and late postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Ultraflex stent was used in 14 patients, Hood stent in 9 and Montgomery T-tube in 22. The overall clinical improvement was 95.5%. Four per cent of the patients (2/45) had intraoperative complications, 8.8% (4/45) had early postoperative complications and 51% (23/45) had late postoperative complications. No significant difference was determined between stent type and complication rates. CONCLUSION: Rigid bronchoscopic insertion of airway stents for tracheal stenosis is a safe and effective procedure. No difference exists between stent type and clinical improvement, intraoperative and early and late postoperative complications.     

The role of airway stenting in pediatric tracheobronchial obstruction

OBJECTIVE: Tracheobronchial obstruction is infrequent in the pediatric age group but it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study is to review the results of a single institution experience with endoscopic stent placement in children with benign tracheobronchial obstruction, and with special concern on safety and clinical effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with severe airway stenosing disease in which stent placement was performed between 1993 and 2006. Inclusion criteria according to the clinical status were: failure to wean from ventilation, episode of apnea, frequent respiratory infections (>3 pneumonia/year), and severe respiratory distress. Additional criteria for stent placement were: failure of surgical treatment, bronchomalacia, and tracheomalacia refractory to previous tracheostomy. Selection of the type of stent depended on the site of the lesion, the patient's age, and the stent availability when time of presentation. The following variables were retrospectively evaluated: age, type of obstruction, associated malformations, stent properties, technical and clinical success, complications and related reinterventions, outcome and follow-up period. RESULTS: Thirty-three stents were placed in the trachea (n=18) and/or bronchi (n=15) of 21 patients with a median age of 6 months (range, 9 days-19 years). Etiology of the airway obstruction included severe tracheomalacia and/or bronchomalacia in 19 cases (90%), and postoperative tracheal stenosis in two. Twelve children had a total of 20 balloon-expandable metallic stents placed, and 10 had 13 silicone-type stents (one patient had both). In nine patients (42%) more than one device was placed. Stent positioning was technically successful in all but one patient. Clinical improvement was observed in 18 patients (85%) but complications occurred in five of them (27%). Eight patients died during follow-up but only in one case it was related to airway stenting. Thirteen patients (62%) are alive and in good condition with a mean follow-up of 39 months (1-13.8 years). CONCLUSIONS: Although the results were based on a small series, placement of stents in the pediatric airway to treat tracheobronchial obstruction seems to be safe and effective. Stenting is a satisfactory therapeutic option when other procedures have failed or are not indicated.     

Airway stents

Airway stenting has been well used in the treatment and palliation of patients with malignant stenoses and to a lesser extent in those with benign disease causing airway compromise. Stents are either constructed of silicone or metal, usually a nitinol, a nickel and titanium alloy. The different categories of stents have positive and negative attributes that play a role in choosing the proper stent. This article aims to discuss these issues with regards to malignant and benign tracheobronchial disease.     

A new intratracheal stent for tracheobronchial reconstruction: experimental and clinical studies

An intraluminal tracheal stent (ITS) was used experimentally in rabbits and piglets, as well as clinically in infants with tracheal stenosis, to facilitate airway reconstruction. The ITSs were constructed of stainless-steel springs covered with silicone rubber. They were implanted in seven piglets (6 to 8 kg), five rabbits (3 to 5 kg) and three infants. No animals developed severe respiratory distress and all appeared to tolerate the ITS. Postmortem examinations 1 to 8 weeks after surgery showed (1) loss of stent fixation (one pig), (2) increased tracheal secretions, (3) pneumonia (one pig, two rabbits), and (4) focal squamous metaplasia of tracheal mucosa. Stents used to treat three infants (2 to 5 months of age) with complex tracheobronchial stenosis were placed at the time of periosteal tracheoplasty in two. Recurrent stenosis necessitated a second tracheoplasty and stenting in one, and a long tracheostomy tube and balloon dilatations in the other. The third child had endoscopic stent insertion to alleviate severe airway collapse after esophageal tracheoplasty. The child died from progressive respiratory failure after stent dislodgment. Although the stents were well tolerated in animals and they enhanced critical ventilation of all pulmonary lobes in infants after tracheal reconstruction, certain modifications such as alternative methods of fixation, accommodation for tracheal growth, and reduction in tissue reactivity are necessary before further use of the ITS can be advocated.     

Tracheobronchial stents for management of airway stenosis

Airway prostheses provide an excellent method for providing relief for patients with malignant or benign stenoses. Two types of prostheses are currently available: rigid silicone stents and metallic expandable stents. Silicone stents have been proven to be well tolerated, nonreactive, and easily removable during several decades of clinical application. However, they impair the drainage of sputum because of interrupted ciliary movement. Subsequently, retained secretions within the stent lumen can be obstructive. In addition, dislodgment frequently occurs because of their rigidity. The advantages of metallic expandable stents are as follows: 1) they can be inserted under local anesthesia with relative simplicity: 2) they do not impair the drainage of sputum: 3) ventilation is usually possible even if the metallic mesh stent covers another bronchus: and 4) their flexibility allows them to bend and conform better than rigid stents to tortuous airway stenoses. The disadvantages of metallic stents are: 1) tumor or granulation ingrowth can occur because of their porosity: 2) removal is difficult: and 3) there is limited experience with their use because they have only recently been employed for airway stenoses.