Second autologous or allogeneic transplantation after the failure of first autograft in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND: Most patients undergoing high-dose therapy and autologous transplant for multiple myeloma eventually develop a disease recurrence. However, to the authors' knowledge, the optimal salvage treatment for these patients is not well defined. Both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations have been used for salvage therapy. The outcomes of salvage autologous or allogeneic transplants were analyzed retrospectively in patients relapsing after an autograft. METHODS: Fourteen patients (median age, 52 yrs) received a second autograft for salvage, whereas 26 patients (median age, 51 yrs) underwent a reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation (related in 18 patients and unrelated in 8 patients). The median interval between the first and the second transplant was 25 months in the autologous group and 17 months in the allogeneic group. The two groups were evenly matched with regard to other disease characteristics. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 18 months for the autologous group and 30 months for the allogeneic group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the 2 groups were 6.8 months versus 7.3 months and 29 months versus 13 months, respectively. Acute and chronic graft versus host disease (15%) was the most common cause of non-recurrence mortality in the allogeneic group and infections (14%) in the autologous group. On univariate analysis, an interval of > 1 year between the first and the salvage transplant predicted a better OS in the allogeneic group. CONCLUSIONS: Both autografting and allografting are feasible as salvage therapy for myeloma patients who develop disease recurrence after the first autograft, although disease progression remains the major cause of failure. Better approaches are needed for salvage therapy in patients developing disease recurrence after an autograft.     

Prolonged survival after second autologous transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance for salvage treatment of myeloma patients at first relapse after prior autograft

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as part of the primary therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) is standard practice. In contrast, the role of a second ASCT (ASCT2) and subsequent lenalidomide maintenance for relapsed disease remains unclear. In this study, we analysed 86 consecutive MM patients with a first relapse after prior ASCT receiving either a second ASCT or conventional chemotherapy. After a median follow‐up of 37.7 months since first relapse, 54 (62.8%) patients were still alive and 29 (33.7%) without progression. Sixty‐one (71.0%) patients received ASCT2 and had better progression‐free survival (PFS) (30.2 versus 13.0 mo; P = .0262) and overall survival (OS) rates (129.6 versus 33.5 mo; P = .0003) compared with 25 (29.0%) patients with conventional treatment. Patients relapsing later than 12 months after ASCT1 benefitted from a second ASCT with better PFS2 (P = .0179) and OS2 (P = .0009). Finally, lenalidomide maintenance after ASCT2 was associated with longer PFS (41.0 vs 21.6 mo; P = .0034) and better OS (not yet reached vs 129.6 mo; P = .0434) compared with patients without maintenance. Our data suggest that a second ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance given at first relapse in MM after prior ASCT are associated with better survival rates.     

10 years of experience with thalidomide in multiple myeloma patients: Report of the Czech Myeloma Group

We analyzed 1156 multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with thalidomide. The overall response rate was 63.6%, with complete remission in 13.4%. Combined regimens had better outcomes than thalidomide plus dexamethasone or single agent thalidomide. Thalidomide was not able to overcome adverse cytogenetics. Superior results were seen in patients undergoing subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation. The rate of adverse events was low.     

Lenalidomide versus bortezomib maintenance after frontline autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

Lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance (MT) post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard of care in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) but has not been compared to other agents in clinical trials. We retrospectively compared bortezomib (BTZ; n = 138) or LEN (n = 183) MT from two subsequent GMMG phase III trials. All patients received three cycles of BTZ-based triplet induction and post-ASCT MT. BTZ MT (1.3 mg/m² i.v.) was administered every 2 weeks for 2 years. LEN MT included two consolidation cycles (25 mg p.o., days 1–21 of 28 day cycles) followed by 10–15 mg/day for 2 years. The BTZ cohort more frequently received tandem ASCT (91% vs. 33%) due to different tandem ASCT strategies. In the LEN and BTZ cohort, 43% and 46% of patients completed 2 years of MT as intended (p = 0.57). Progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.83, p = 0.18) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.70, p = 0.15) did not differ significantly with LEN vs. BTZ MT. Patients with <nCR after first ASCT were assigned tandem ASCT in both trials. In patients with <nCR and tandem ASCT (LEN: n = 54 vs. BTZ: n = 84), LEN MT significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.61, p = 0.04) but not OS (HR = 0.46, p = 0.09). In conclusion, the significant PFS benefit after eliminating the impact of different tandem ASCT rates supports the current standard of LEN MT after ASCT.Subject terms: Myeloma, Medical research     

Comparison between autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation as salvage therapy for multiple myeloma relapsing/progressing after autologous stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo‐SCT) offers a clinical option to young patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapsing/progressing after autologous SCT (ASCT); however, this claim remains debatable. Thus, in this retrospective study, we analyzed 526 patients with MM who underwent SCT for MM relapsing/progressing after the prior ASCT using the registry data of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (2001‐2015) and compared overall survival (OS) between allo‐SCT (n = 192) and autologous stem cell retransplantation groups (ReASCT; n = 334) based on risk factor points. Significant adverse factors for OS in all patients were (1) male sex, (2) less than partial response to SCT, (3) performance status of 2 to 4, and (4) short duration from the prior ASCT. We scored factor 2 as 1 point, factor 3 as 2 points, and factor 4 as 0, 1, or 2 points for more than 30, 9 to 30, or less than 9 months, respectively. We categorized patients into three risk subgroups based on their total points (0, 1‐3, and 4‐5 points), indicating the usefulness of this scoring system for prognosis prediction and treatment selection. Subgroup comparison revealed OS after ReASCT to be higher than that after allo‐SCT in the intermediate‐risk subgroup comprising the largest population (28.2% vs 21.5%, P < .004). We observed no significant advantages of allo‐SCT over ReASCT in the low‐ and high‐risk subgroups. These findings suggest that ReASCT is more advantageous than allo‐SCT in many patients with MM relapsing/progressing after the prior ASCT. However, long‐term survival patients were noted only in the allo‐SCT group, and allo‐SCT could exhibit clinical efficacy, particularly in the low‐risk group. While further examination is warranted, allo‐SCT could be a potential tool for a specific population with MM relapsing/progressing after the prior ASCT.     

Immunotherapy by non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: results of a pilot study as salvage therapy after autologous transplantation.

Non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation has been reported to induce sustained complete remission even in advanced diseases (acute leukemia, lymphomas). The tolerance of this procedure allows treatment of poor candidates to conventional allogeneic transplantation with persisting or relapsing myeloma patients. Twelve patients previously treated with at least VAD regimen and autologous transplantation were included. All patients had a serum beta2 microglobuline >3 mg/l at diagnosis. The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine 25 mg/m/day x 5, antithymoglobulin 2.5 mg/kg/day x 5, busulphan 2 mg/kg/day x 2; the transplant was peripheral stem cells (except one) from an HLA-matched sibling and was followed by cyclosporin for 45 to 90 days. This treatment results in a well-tolerated procedure (no mucositis, duration of aplasia <7 days). A dramatic graft anti-myeloma effect is documented even in progressive disease (11/12 PR + CR, 4/12 CR). However, five patients underwent CMV disease, one died of CMV encephalitis (UPN 3) and delayed severe GVHD occurred in four patients. Our data suggest that a better survival could be achieved when patients are transplanted with a controlled disease. In high risk patients, we now propose a non-myeloablative transplantation in addition to the conventional and intensive chemotherapy as first-line of treatment.     

Limited benefits of thalidomide and dexamethasone maintenance after autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a prospective phase II multi-center study in Korea

Although the clinical outcome of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has improved with maintenance therapy, maintenance with novel agents is not always available depending on medical expenses or drug accessibility. We intended to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide/dexamethasone maintenance in Korean patients. In this multicenter phase 2 study, patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who underwent induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were enrolled to receive maintenance treatment of 100mg thalidomide daily for 28 days and 40mg dexamethasone daily for 4 days each cycle. Maintenance was given up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was a 1-year event free survival (EFS) rate. It was assumed that EFS at 1-year would be 91% with thalidomide and 1-year EFS below 82% would be of no effect. A total of 43 patients were consecutively enrolled (median age, 58 years [range, 34 – 65]; male, n = 31). With a median follow-up duration of 17.3 months (range, 1.1 – 32.2), EFS at 1 year was 65.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.9 – 77.3). PFS and OS at 1 year was 85.6% (95% CI, 70.7 – 93.3) and 90.4 (95% CI, 76.3 – 96.3), respectively. In terms of side effects, 39 patients (90.7%) experienced adverse events (AEs) of any grade, and 14 patients (32.6%) experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. 15 patients (34.9%) failed to complete 12 cycles of maintenance, and the most common reason for premature termination was AEs (n = 6). In Korean patients the benefits of thalidomide maintenance does not seem to outweigh the toxicity of thalidomide, especially in high-risk MM. Considering the long clinical course of MM, preservation of quality of life and finances might be more beneficial for subsequent MM treatment.     

Molecular remission after allogeneic or autologous transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells for multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical relevance of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), 50 patients were monitored while they were in complete clinical remission (CCR) after autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stringent molecular monitoring using clonal markers based on rearranged immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes was performed in 44 of 50 MM patients in CCR. Molecular clinical remission (MCR) was defined as more than one consecutive negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test result. RESULTS: Twelve (27%) of 44 molecularly monitored patients achieved MCR; four of the 12 became PCR-positive, and one of these four relapsed. In comparison with patients who did not achieve MCR, patients who achieved MCR had a significantly lower relapse rate (41% v 16%; P <.05) and longer relapse-free survival (35 v 110 months; P <.005). Fourteen of 26 patients in CCR who had received allografts were evaluated on a molecular basis: seven (50%) of the 14 achieved MCR and did not relapse; one of the seven remaining patients relapsed. Thirty of 47 patients in CCR who received autografts were evaluated on a molecular basis: five (16%) of the 30 achieved MCR; two of these five became PCR-negative, and one of these two relapsed. Ten of the 25 remaining patients later relapsed. For these nonrandomized groups, the higher MCR rate after allograft procedures was statistically significant (P <.01; Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: MCR can be obtained in a relatively high proportion of MM patients who have achieved CCR after undergoing allograft procedures and in a smaller fraction of patients after undergoing autograft procedures. In approximately one fourth of MM patients who achieve CCR after transplantation, it may be possible to keep the disease burden constantly below the PCR threshold. Because MCR was associated with prolonged relapse-free survival, these patients could have a relatively favorable clinical outcome.     

Long-term follow-up of gene-marked CD34+ cells after autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

Gene marking can be used to investigate if progenitor cells harvested from patients are contaminated with tumorigenic cells. It can also provide information about the contribution of hematopoietic stem cells to long-term engraftment and about long-term transgene expression from integrated retroviral vectors. In order to study autologous-infused cell contribution to relapse as well as the long-term persistence of the transgene in hematopoietic cells following autologous bone marrow (BM) transplantation for multiple myeloma, we genetically marked autologous CD34+ enriched BM or peripheral blood cell grafts of eight myeloma patients using retroviral vectors. Six patients were subsequently transplanted with the marked graft and followed with regular time points of analysis. Briefly, mononuclear cells were harvested by leukapheresis during 2-4 consecutive days following priming with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or G-CSF. The CD34+ cells separated on Cellpro ceprate avidin-biotin columns were exposed to the G1Na vector coding for neomycin resistance gene at a ratio of five vector particles per cell at three consecutive time points achieving an average transduction efficacy of 2% (0.43-5.1%). The patients were transplanted with a mixture of transduced cells and un-manipulated graft. Vector integration and transgene expression were analyzed by colony assays and polymerase chain reaction. The transgene could be detected for up to 5 years post-transplant in normal BM cells, even in remission following relapse and no side effects related to retroviral gene transfer were observed. There were no marked myeloma cells observed in the patients either in remission or in relapsing disease, which indicates that contribution of infused cells to relapse is unlikely.     

The dose of infused lymphocytes in the autograft directly correlates with clinical outcome after autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Absolute lymphocyte count at day 15 (ALC-15) after autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APHSCT) is an independent prognostic factor for survival in multiple myeloma (MM); however, factors affecting ALC-15 in MM remain unknown. We hypothesized that the dose of infused peripheral blood autograft lymphocytes (autograft absolute lymphocyte count: A-ALC) impacts ALC-15 recovery. Between 1989 and 2001, 267 consecutive MM patients underwent APHSCT. We set out to determine the correlation between A-ALC and ALC-15 and the utility of A-ALC as a marker for ALC-15 recovery. A-ALC was found to be both a strong predictor for area under curve (AUC=0.93; P=0.0001) and strongly correlated with (r(s)=0.83; P=0.0001) ALC-15 recovery. Higher infused A-ALC was significantly correlated with an ALC-15>/=500/microl. In addition, median post-transplant overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were longer in patients who received an A-ALC>/=0.5 x 10(9) lymphocytes/kg versus A-ALC <0.5 x 10(9) lymphocytes/kg (58 vs 30 months, P=0.00022; 22 vs 15 months, P<0.00012, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated A-ALC as an independent prognostic indicator for OS and TTP. These results indicate that an infused dose of autograft lymphocytes significantly impacts clinical outcome post-APHSCT in MM.     

Targeting complete response with upfront bortezomib consolidation versus observation after the achievement of complete response following autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma (TUBA study)

Complete response (CR) after treatment for multiple myeloma is associated with superior progression‐free survival (PFS). Multiple myeloma patients were prospectively recruited for induction treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone (BD) followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto‐HCT) between 2010 and 2012. If patients did not achieve CR after auto‐HCT, BD consolidation therapy was added to target CR. After the BD induction phase (n = 46), greater than or equal to CR was achieved in 4 patients (8%). After auto‐HCT (n = 34), greater than or equal to CR was achieved in 9 patients (20%) and very good partial response (VGPR) was achieved in 11 (24%). Of the 24 patients who received auto‐HCT and whose response was less than CR, 21 received BD consolidation therapy for a median of 4 courses. Finally, the maximum response with or without BD consolidation was greater than or equal to CR in 19 (41%), VGPR in 7 (15%), and PR in 6 (13%). Through BD consolidation, CR was achieved in 8 of 11 patients with post‐HCT VGPR and in 2 of 12 patients with post‐HCT PR. In total, 4 year PFS and overall survival were 43 and 80%, respectively. After adjusting for clinical factors, there was no difference in PFS between CR patients after auto‐HCT and BD consolidation, while patients with less than or equal to VGPR after consolidation had a significantly lower PFS. Patients with post‐HCT CR showed good PFS, and targeting CR through BD consolidation could improve the CR rate. It would be worthwhile to prospectively compare the efficacy of consolidation only for patients who failed to achieve CR to a universal consolidation strategy.     

Partially T-cell-depleted allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for first-line treatment of multiple myeloma: a prospective evaluation of patients treated in the phase III study HOVON 24 MM.

PURPOSE: To determine in a prospective study the efficacy, toxicity, and long-term outcome of up-front allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the prospective phase III study by the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON), HOVON 24 MM, 53 patients with an HLA-identical sibling (median age at transplantation, 48 years; range, 31 to 56 years) were allocated to a partial T-cell-depleted allo-SCT after induction therapy. RESULTS: The overall response rate after allo-SCT was 89% (47 of 53 patients), including the 19% of patients (10 of 53 patients) with a complete remission (CR). Five patients achieved a CR only after allo-SCT. Five (71%) of seven primary refractory patients obtained a response to allo-SCT, all of whom had a partial remission. With a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 25 to 61 months), 20 patients are alive since allo-SCT and 33 patients have died (14 from progressive disease, 18 from treatment-related mortality [TRM], and one from another cause). Occurrence of acute graft-versus-host disease grades 2 to 4 predicted for higher TRM in a time-dependent analysis. The median progression-free survival time after allo-SCT was 17 months. Median overall survival time after allo-SCT was 25 months, or 29 months from the start of therapy. Only three patients are in continuing CR, indicating that the potential cure rate of this approach is, at best, 6%. CONCLUSION: This first prospective evaluation of up-front allo-SCT of MM in a multicenter setting does not support the use of T-cell-depleted myeloablative allo-SCT as part of first-line therapy.     

Results of a multicenter randomized phase II trial of thalidomide and prednisone maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplant.

We report a multicenter, randomized phase II trial conducted to assess the tolerability of combined thalidomide and prednisone maintenance in multiple myeloma. Eligibility required administration of melphalan (200 mg/m2) with blood stem cell support within 1 year of treatment onset and initiation of maintenance within 60 to 100 days after stem cell infusion. All patients received 50 mg of prednisone by mouth on alternate days and thalidomide at a starting dose of either 200 or 400 mg daily by mouth. The primary end point was the incidence of dropout or dose reduction due to treatment toxicity within 6 months. Sixty-seven patients were enrolled. Median follow-up is 36.8 months. The primary end point was reached by 31% of patients on the 200 mg of thalidomide arm and 64% of patients on the 400 mg of thalidomide arm. Allowing for dose reduction, 76% of patients assigned to the 200 mg of thalidomide arm and 41% of patients assigned to the 400 mg of thalidomide arm remained on any maintenance therapy 18 months after registration. Eighty-eight percent of all patients dose-reduced thalidomide and 72% of all patients dose-reduced prednisone within 2 years of beginning maintenance. The median progression-free survival post-transplant is 32.3 months, or 42.2 months from diagnosis. Only the 200 mg of thalidomide arm of this trial met our definition of a tolerable maintenance therapy, defined as no dose reductions or discontinuation due to toxicity in at least 65% of patients for a minimum of 6 months, thus establishing a dosing schedule for phase III trials.     

Pyogenic granuloma of the tongue early after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for multiple myeloma

Oral complications occur frequently after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Some of them are caused by regimen-related toxicity of the preparative regimen, and others by infections. In addition, oral tissues are targets of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Oral granulomatous lesions are not a common complication after BMT, and are especially rare on the tongue. Such rare lesions reported in the literature, developed late after BMT with oral chronic GVHD. We present here a patient who developed pyogenic granuloma of the tongue early after allogeneic BMT done for multiple myeloma. Regimen-related mucositis, oral acute GVHD, the administration of cyclosporine A, and the preexisting macroglossia might be responsible for the formation of granuloma.     

Outcome and prognostic factors in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma relapsing after autologous stem-cell transplantation: a retrospective study of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

BackgroundAutologous stem-cell transplantation (autoSCT) is considered a standard treatment of non-frail patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but little is known about outcome of MCL patients relapsing after autoSCT. We therefore sought to analyse the outcome after autoSCT failure and the efficacy of a rescue stem-cell transplantation (SCT) in this setting.Patients and methodsPatients with MCL were eligible if they had relapsed after autoSCT performed between 2000 and 2009. A total of 1054 patients could be identified in the EBMT registry. By contacting the transplant centres, a full dataset could be retrieved for 360 patients.ResultsMedian overall survival (OS) after relapse of the whole study group was 19 months. A long (>12 months) interval between autoSCT and relapse [P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.62], primary refractory disease (P < 0.02, HR 1.92), prior high-dose ARA-C treatment (P = 0.04, HR 1.43), and the year of relapse (P = 0.02, HR 0.92) significantly influenced OS from relapse in multivariate analysis.Eighty patients (22%) received a rescue allogeneic SCT (alloSCT). Relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and OS 2 years after alloSCT was 33% [confidence interval (95% CI 21% to 45%)], 30% (95% CI 19% to 42%), and 46% (95% CI 33% to 59%), respectively. Remission duration after autoSCT was the only variable significantly affecting the outcome of salvage alloSCT. In contrast, rescue autoSCT was not associated with long-term disease control. However, individual patients survived long term even without salvage transplantation.ConclusionsMCL recurrence within 1 year after autoSCT has an extremely dismal outcome, while the prognosis of patients with longer remission durations after autoSCT is significantly better. AlloSCT may offer the possibility of durable survival when performed for patients with a remission duration of more than 12 months after first autoSCT, but the favourable effect of a salvage alloSCT in this setting needs further validation.     

Changing trends in prognostic factors for patients with multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplantation during the immunomodulator drug/proteasome inhibitor era

We evaluated the clinical significance of prognostic factors including the International Staging System (ISS) and modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation response criteria in 1650 Japanese patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who underwent upfront single autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We categorized patients into two treatment cohorts: pre‐novel agent era (1995–2006) and novel agent era (2008–2011). The combined percentage of pre‐ASCT complete response and very good partial response cases (463 of 988, 47%) significantly increased during the novel agent era compared with the pre‐novel agent era (164 of 527, 31%; P < 0.0001). The 2‐year overall survival (OS) rate of 87% during the novel agent era was a significant improvement relative to that of 82% during the pre‐novel agent era (P = 0.019). Although significant differences in OS were found among ISS stages during the pre‐novel agent era, no significant difference was observed between ISS I and II (P = 0.107) during the novel agent era. The factors independently associated with a superior OS were female gender (P = 0.002), a good performance status (P = 0.024), lower ISS (P < 0.001), pre‐ASCT response at least partial response (P < 0.001) and ASCT during the novel agent era (P = 0.017). These results indicate that the response rate and OS were significantly improved, and the ISS could not clearly stratify the prognoses of Japanese patients with MM who underwent upfront single ASCT during the novel agent era.     

Oral versus intravenous melphalan and prednisone treatment in multiple myeloma stage II. A randomized study from the Myeloma Group of Central Sweden

Eighty-one previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma stage II entered a randomized trial comparing oral melphalan (0.25 mg/kg/day; n = 40) with intravenous melphalan (0.125 mg/kg/day; n = 41) in combination with oral prednisone (2 mg/kg/day). The courses were given for 4 days and repeated every sixth week. The treatment groups were well comparable with regard to major prognostic factors. There was no statistically significant difference in the response rates, the response duration times and the survival times. No significant difference in nonhematological and hematological toxicity was noted. Since intravenous administration of melphalan did not result in a substantial increase in response rate or survival, this study supports the use of oral melphalan/prednisone as first-line therapy for patients with multiple myeloma.