Phase II trial of gemcitabine/irinotecan in refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine and irinotecan have shown a broad range of activity in solid tumors, including small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), with a synergistic effect on SCLC cell lines. The objective of this phase II trial was to evaluate the activity of gemcitabine/irinotecan in patients with relapsed SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients (15 with refractory disease and 20 with sensitive disease) who had experienced treatment failure with 1 previous chemotherapy regimen were recruited. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. Eligibility criteria included an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, and signed informed consent. RESULTS: All 35 patients were assessable for response, survival, and toxicity. Best objective responses exhibited were as follows: complete response in 2 patients (6%), partial response in 4 (11%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21%-61%), stable disease in 7 (20%; 95% CI, 9%-45%), and progressive disease in 22 (63%; 95% CI, 17%-57%). Median time to disease progression was 3.4 months and median survival was 5.8 months. The 1-year survival rate was 34%. Toxicity was mainly hematologic. Grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting occurred in 9% of patients, neuropathy occurred in 2.8%, and diarrhea occurred in 14.3%. Survival was not significantly different for patients with refractory versus sensitive disease. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine/irinotecan was shown to be active as second-line chemotherapy, especially in patients with refractory disease.     

Phase II study of irinotecan and carboplatin in patients with the refractory or relapsed small cell lung cancer

We examined the safety and efficacy of the combination of irinotecan plus carboplatin in patients with refractory or relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients with previously treated SCLC were eligible. Patients were treated every 3 weeks with carboplatin (with a target area under the concentration versus time curve of 5 mg min/ml using the Calvert formula on day 1) plus irinotecan (50 mg/m² on days 1 and 8). From May 2000 to January 2002, 24 patients were eligible. None of the 22 patients achieved a complete response, but 15 achieved a partial response with an overall response rate of 68.2% (95% confidence interval, 45.1–86.1%). In 13 patients with sensitive disease, the response rate was 92.3% (95% confidence interval, 64.0–99.8%). The median survival time (MST) was 194 days (range 27–605 days). The MST did not differ significantly between patients with sensitive disease (245 days) and those with refractory disease (194 days, P=0.88). One patient died of treatment-related sepsis. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities included leukopenia in 58% of patients, neutropenia in 63%, thrombocytopenia in 58%, and anemia in 67%. Grade 3 diarrhea developed in 21% of patients and grade 3–4 infection in 13%. No patients had grade 4 diarrhea or grade 3–4 nausea and vomiting. This regimen is effective and well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory SCLC. However, the search for even more active regimens should be continued.     

Phase II trial of second-line bendamustine chemotherapy in relapsed small cell lung cancer patients

PURPOSE: The efficacy and toxicity of bendamustine chemotherapy in relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) was determined in this phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cytologically or histologically proven SCLC, who had a sensitive relapse, which was defined as a relapse>or=2 months after completion of primary therapy, were eligible for this study. After informed consent patients received 120 mg/m2 of bendamustine on Days 1 and 2 every 3 weeks. A maximum of six cycles was administered. Primary endpoint was response rate, secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression free survival and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with a median age of 59 years (range 47-76) were accrued to this trial. Six (29%) of 21 patients achieved a confirmed partial remission, 6 (29%) had stable disease and 9 (42%) patients progressed according to RECIST criteria. Median progression free survival was 4 months (95% CI 0-8, 3), median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI 5, 8-8, 2). One- and 2-year survival was 16% and 8%, respectively. Grade III/IV neutropenia occurred in 3 (15%) of 21 patients, 1 patient had a lethal Gram-negative sepsis in neutropenia. Two additional patients had pneumonia in the absence of neutropenia. Two patients (10%) had a grade III anemia, no grade III or IV thrombocytopenia was observed. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrates efficacy of bendamustine in relapsed SCLC and a favourable toxicity profile. Therefore, single-agent bendamustine is a treatment option for patients with SCLC, who have responded to initial platinum containing chemotherapy and should further be investigated in randomized trials.     

Comparison of second-line treatment outcomes between sensitive and refractory small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective analysis

Purpose

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a high relapse rate despite being very chemosensitive. The efficacy of second-line treatment is dismal. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of second-line treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed data of 120 SCLC patients who failed first-line treatment and received second-line treatment at three medical oncology centers.

Results

Median age of group was 58. 82 % had an ECOG PS of 0–1 at the time of relapse. 39 % were at limited stage (LS) at the time of diagnosis. Patients who progressed more than 3 months after first-line therapy were categorized as having platinum-sensitive disease (PSD) (64 %). The number of patients who received platin-based combination treatment was 33 (27 %). The median OS time starting from the initiation of second-line treatment was 7 months. Multivariate analysis identified PS (p = 0.006), extent of disease at diagnosis (0.014) and PSD (0.001) as the independent prognostic factors for survival. Subgroup analyses of the patients with PSD indicated platin rechallenge yields higher progression-free survival, overall survival and overall response rate.

Conclusion

Patients with good ECOG PS,who have PSD or initially presenting with LS, have a good prognosis and in patients with PSD, platinum-based therapy would be more appropriate.     

Phase 2 study of irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with recurrent or refractory small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND:

Patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who develop disease progression with standard cisplatin‐based therapy are reported to have a poor overall prognosis. Irinotecan and paclitaxel are active as single agents and exhibit preclinical synergy in SCLC cell lines. A phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate this combination in patients with recurrent or refractory SCLC.

METHODS:

Patients with SCLC who progressed with 1 prior chemotherapy regimen and had measurable disease present; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function were included in the study. Paclitaxel (at a dose of 75 mg/m²) and irinotecan (at a dose of 50 mg/m²) were administered intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of each 3‐week treatment cycle. Therapy was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The target response rate of interest was ≥30%.

RESULTS:

A total of 55 patients were enrolled, 51 of whom received at least 1 dose of therapy. The majority of the patients had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 (96%). A median of 3 cycles of treatment was administered, and 15 patients received ≥6 cycles. Seventeen patients experienced toxicity of grade 3 or higher (neutropenia in 8 patients and fatigue in 5 patients). The overall response rate was 21%. The median survival was 25.4 weeks, and the 1‐year survival rate was 22%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The regimen of irinotecan and paclitaxel was found to be tolerated well in patients with recurrent or refractory SCLC. Although modest anticancer activity was noted, the efficacy failed to meet the primary endpoint of interest. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Phase II study of vincristine infusion in refractory small cell carcinoma of the lung

Fifteen patients with extensive refractory small cell carcinoma of the lung received prolonged intravenous infusion of vincristine. All but one patient had previously been given vincristine by conventional bolus injection. Treatment consisted of a 0.5-mg bolus injection followed immediately by 0.25 mg/m2/day infusion which was continued for 5 days. Toxicity in general was minimal, but rapidly progressive disease precluded adequate assessment in the majority of patients. No objective responses were observed. Infusion of vincristine does not appear to be an efficacious salvage treatment for this disease.     

A phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine as a second-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the single-agent gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as second-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Between February 2002 and November 2004, a total of 27 patients, who had previously been treated with paclitaxel and platinum as first line chemotherapy, were enrolled in the study. Patients were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28 day cycle. The response was assessed every two cycles. Toxicities were evaluated according to common toxicity criteria (CTC). RESULTS: The median age was 62 (range, 46-79) years old. Among the 27 patients, 26 were male. Twenty-three patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 and four patients had a status of 2. Pathologically, 24 patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 3 had adenocarcinoma. Partial responses were observed in 15 patients. All patients were evaluated for response and toxicity. The overall response rate was 18.5% (95% confidence interval, 5-33%) and the median response duration was 17 (range, 7.4 to 49+) weeks. The median time to progression was 10 (range, 7 to 34+) weeks. The median overall survival for all patients was 38 (range, 10 to 122+) weeks. During a total of 87 cycles, granulocytopenia greater than CTC grade 2 occurred in 7%, thrombocytopenia in 1% and anemia in 24% of case. Non-hematologic toxicities were minor and easily controlled. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the activity and safety of the single-agent gemcitabine as a second-line therapy in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Phase II study of weekly irinotecan and cisplatin for refractory or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer

Even with the standard first-line chemotherapy, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recurs in most cases. The purpose of this study is to develop a new chemotherapeutic regimen for patients with NSCLC that has relapsed or was refractory to previous chemotherapy. Patients with proven NSCLC refractory or recurrent after previous single-regimen chemotherapy, PS of 0-2, age of 15 years or older, adequate organ functions and measurable lesions were treated with irinotecan at 60 mg/m(2) and cisplatin at 25 mg/m(2) with 1000 ml hydration on day 1. This administration, considered as one cycle, was repeated every week without rest unless encountering defined skip and dose-reduction criteria. The treatment was administered for six cycles over a 49-day period, both median values, to 48 patients, with a response rate of 26%, progression free and median survival times of 3 and 11 months, respectively, and a 1-year survival rate of 46%. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia, anaemia and nausea, which were manageable. Subset analyses suggested that the response rate was independent of response to the first-line chemotherapy. In conclusion, second-line chemotherapy of weekly irinotecan and cisplatin with minimum hydration seemed effective, with tolerable toxicity, and is potentially useful irrespective of the outcome of previous chemotherapy.     

Results of a Phase II study of carboplatin plus gemcitabine in patients with untreated extensive small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate (RR) and survival produced by carboplatin + gemcitabine therapy in patients with untreated extensive small cell lung cancer (ESCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment consisted of carboplatin (AUC = 5) on day 1 and gemcitabine (1100 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle for 4 planned cycles (additional cycles allowed as per treating physician). ECOG performance status 0/1/2 was 29, 58, and 13%. Median age was 66.5 years (range: 41.3-83.1), 94% were white, and 50.7% were female. RESULTS: Between August 2000 and February 2002, 69 patients with ESCLC were enrolled. All 69 patients were included in the safety analysis, and 66 patients were evaluable for response. There were 2 CR (3.0%), 26 PR (39.5%), 23 SD (34.8%), and 15 PD (22.7%) resulting in a RR of 42.5%. The median survival was 9.2 months (range: <1-22.6), and the estimated 1-year survival was 33%. The median TTP was 3.9 months (range: <1-12.8), and the estimated 6-month progression free survival was 24%. The median duration of response was 3.8 months (range: 1.0-9.9). Out of 69 patients, 29, 3, and 16 received 4, 5, and 6 cycles of therapy, respectively. The major Grade 3, 4 toxicities included neutropenia (39.1%), thrombocytopenia (31.9%), anemia (13.0%), and fatigue (4.3%). CONCLUSION: This regimen resulted in survival data that was similar to other regimens for ESCLC and treatment appeared to be well tolerated. Gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin or other active drugs in ESCLC may be worth further investigation.     

Phase II trial of amrubicin and carboplatin in patients with sensitive or refractory relapsed small-cell lung cancer

Amrubicin is a novel, totally synthesized anthracycline derivative, and has antitumor activity against several human tumor xenografts. The combination of amrubicin with platinum derivative showed additive effect against a human small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell line. Until now, the combination of amrubicin plus carboplatin has not been studied in patients with previously treated SCLC. Therefore, we examined the safety and efficacy of the combination of amrubicin plus carboplatin in patients with sensitive or refractory relapsed SCLC. Patients with previously treated SCLC were eligible if they had a performance status of 2 or less, were 75 years or younger, and had adequate organ function. Twenty-five patients were enrolled (21 men and 4 women; median age, 65 years; age range 55-73 years). Patients received the combination of amrubicin (30 mg/m² on days 1-3) plus carboplatin (with a target area under the concentration-versus-time curve of 4 mg min/ml using the Calvert formula on day 1) every 3 weeks. The overall response rate was 36.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.0-57.5%). Response rates differed significantly between patients with sensitive relapse (58.3%; 95% CI, 27.7-84.8%) and those with refractory relapse (15.4%; 95% CI, 1.9-15.4%; p = 0.03). The median survival time (MST) from the start of this treatment was 7 months (range: 1-42 months); the MST of patients with sensitive relapse (10 months) was significantly longer than that of patients with refractory relapse (5 months: p = 0.004). The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 3 months (range: 1-14 months): the median PFS time of patients with sensitive relapse (5 months) was significantly longer than that of patients with refractory relapse (2 months; p = 0.01). The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicity was myelosuppression, especially neutropenia, which developed in 88% of patients. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia developed in 44% of patients, and anemia developed in 56%. Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild to moderately severe and temporary. None of the patients had cardiotoxicity. In conclusion, this therapy is effective and well tolerated for previously treated SCLC.     

Phase II study of ACNU as second-line treatment in small-cell lung cancer

Summary A total of 24 patients presenting with small-cell lung cancer either resistant to or relapsing within 3 months after first-line treatment were entered in a phase II study of 1-(4-amino-2-methyl-5-pyrimidinyl)-methyl-(2-chloroethyl)-3-nitrosourea hydrochloride (ACNU). ACNU was given i. v. at a dose of 75mg/m² every 6 weeks. We observed a partial response of 7 months' duration in one patient and one case of stable disease that lasted for 6 months; all other subjects exhibited progressive disease. Two patients developed brain metastases during treatment. The toxicity of ACNU consisted mainly of bone marrow suppression, especially thrombocytopenia. At this dose and on this schedule, ACNU shows minimal activity as second-line treatment in small-cell lung cancer.European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer study 08872Other institutions participating in this study included the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (N. van Zandwijk); Maria Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands (J. van der Lichte); Academic Hospital Gdansk, Poland (H. Karnicka); and Hospital San Giovanni, Torino, Italy (M. Donadio)     

Phase II study of regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many novel drugs, including gemcitabine, navelbine, paclitaxel and docetaxel have been used in combination with cisplatin. Of these drugs, gemcitabine is reported to have a high response rate and acceptable toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with NSCLC, who met the selection criteria from June 1998 to January 1999, were enrolled. All of them were confirmed by histology and were in an advanced stage, i.e. stage IIIB with pleural effusion or stage IV. Cisplatin at a dose of 80 mg/m2 was given monthly on day 15, in combination with gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of the 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Of the 32 assessable patients, two showed complete remission and 11 achieved partial remission. The overall response was 40.6% (95% CI, 24.8-56.4%). The median time to disease progression was 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.87-9.53 months). The major hematological toxicity was neutropenia. Seven patients (22.9%) developed grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, but none developed febrile neutropenia. One patient (3.1%) had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. One patient (3.1%) developed grade 3 anemia. Nausea and vomiting were seen in 12 patients (37.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The regimen of combined gemcitabine with cisplatin is safe and effective. With this combination, a lower dose of cisplatin seems to have an efficacy similar to that in previous reports.     

Phase I study of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine as third-line chemotherapy for refractory non-small cell lung cancer

For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is refractory for both platinum-based chemotherapy and docetaxel, no standard regimen has yet been established. We conducted a phase I study of a combination of vinorelbine and gemcitabine as third-line chemotherapy for refractory NSCLC to determine both the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD). Twenty patients with NSCLC refractory for both platinum and docetaxel were enrolled, and all patients were eligible for this phase I study. Cohorts of three to seven patients received vinorelbine at doses ranging from 20 to 25 mg/m(2), and gemcitabine at doses ranging from 600 to 1000 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicities were treatment delay, serum gammaGTP elevation, diarrhea and cerebral infarction, which were resolved without serious sequela, and there was no treatment-related death. The MTD was vinorelbine at 25 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m(2) and the RD was vinorelbine at 25 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine at 800 mg/m(2). The median overall survival time was 6.8 months for all 20 patients eligible. As third-line chemotherapy, the combination of vinorelbine and gemcitabine was feasible and promising for NSCLC which is refractory for both platinum and docetaxel.     

Phase II study of cisplatin-combined schedules as second-line chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cisplatin- (CDDP) combined chemotherapy in non-cisplatin pretreated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The second cytotoxic drug administered was either etoposide or gemcitabine. First-line treatment was based on paclitaxel combined with either carboplatin or vinorelbine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with histologically- or cytologically- confirmed NSCLC, having failed front-line treatment, were enrolled. All patients received 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin as second-line treatment, on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks; in 48 patients the second agent was etoposide (120 mg/m2) on days 1, 2 and 3, repeated every 3 weeks and in 30 patients 1 g/m2 of gemcitabine on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. No complete responses were observed. Thirteen (16.67%) patients achieved partial response, 42 (53.85%) stable disease and 23 (29.49%) had disease progression. The median duration of response was 4 months (range 2-8+ months), median time to tumor progression (TTP) 5 months (range 2-9 months) and median survival time after starting second-line chemotherapy, 6 months (range 2-9+ months). Toxicity was acceptable: 9 patients presented with nephrotoxicity (11.54%) and 13 (16.67%) with grade 3-4 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: The cisplatin combination as second-line treatment in patients with NSCLC exhibited a notable degree of activity and tumor growth control was evidenced by the 16.67% partial response and 53.85% disease stability.     

Phase II study with gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical activity and toxicity of a novel chemotherapy combination regimen of gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin (GIP), administered every 3 weeks, in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From October 1998 to July 1999, 18 previously untreated stages IIIb (4) and IV (14) patients were enrolled into the study. Gemcitabine and ifosfamide (with mesna as uroprotection) was administered on days 1 and 6, at a dose of 1000 and 1500 mg/m², respectively; and cisplatin was given on day 1 at a dose of 60 mg/m², every 3 weeks. All 18 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity profiles. One patient achieved a complete response, and 11 patients achieved a partial response, with an overall response rate of 66.7% (95% CI, 45–89%). The main toxicity was hematological, a NCI grade 3–4 neutropenia in 16 patients (88.9%) during the treatment course. Febrile neutropenia occurred in three patients (16.6%). Grade 3 anemia occurred in eight patients (44.4%) and grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 11 patients (61.1%). Non-hematological toxicity was mild and tolerable. No toxic death occurred. The median survival was 12.7 months and 1 year survival was 58.4%. The GIP combination chemotherapy produced a high response rate in advanced NSCLC; however, there was a relatively high percentage of hematological toxicity that still could be tolerated. A randomized trial comparing GIP to a two-drug combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is planned.     

小细胞肺癌二线治疗进展

小细胞肺癌(Small cell lung cancer,SCLC)是由支气管黏膜基底层的Kulchistky细胞恶变而来,肿瘤细胞有较明显的神经内分泌的分化趋向.在近30年,小细胞肺癌的发病率有所下降,由之前的15%-20%到最新统计的12%-15%[1].SCLC与长期吸烟相关,在肺部肿瘤中恶性程度最高,临床进展明显快于非小细胞肺癌(Non-smallcell lung cancer,NSCLC),多表现为中央型肺癌,较早即出现肺门和纵隔淋巴结的转移,且易侵犯血管,预后极不理想.SCLC对化疗放疗敏感,手术治疗仅对部分早期患者有益,而一线治疗失败及复发的患者预后极差.     

小细胞肺癌的二线化疗及研究进展

 小细胞肺癌（SCLC）恶性度较高，早期即可发生血行转移，但对放化疗敏感，故SCLC治疗应以全身化疗为主，联合放疗和手术为主要治疗手段。尽管SCLC化疗的有效率较高，但对于广泛期SCLC患者，从化疗耐药开始至患者死亡的中位时间仍不满意。对于局限期 SCLC患者在诱导放化疗后仍有75 % ~ 80 %出现复发，故二线治疗是治疗SCLC的重点。     

Phase II study of docetaxel in inoperable advanced non small cell lung cancer

The purpose is to determine the response to, and toxicity of docetaxel (Taxotère) in patients with inoperable non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), previously untreated. Seventy patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were treated by 100 mg/m2/ 3 weeks of docetaxel until tumor progression or severe toxicity. Premedication with diosmine and prednisolone was given in all patients: 66/70 were eligible and 55/70 were assessable for antitumoral activity. Median age: 63 years, WHO performans status 0-1: 83%, stage IV: 96%. For eligible patients, 17/66 (26%) achieved an objective response: 1 complete response and 16 partial response (IC 95% = 15-36). With a median follow-up of 23.4 months (range 14.9-28.7), for evaluable patients, the median response duration was 8 months, the median time to progression 4 months, and the median survival time 10 months. The median number of administered cycles is 5 (range 1-12). The estimate one year survival rate was 47%. Seventy-six patients presented neutropenia (grade 3-4); febrile neutropenia was observed in 7% of cycles. Non haematological toxicities are: fluid retention related to docetaxel (2.9%), diarrhea (6%), nausea-vomiting (4%), asthenia (3%), nail changes (6%). Docetaxel (Taxotère) administered at 100 mg/m2/3 weeks has relevant clinical activity in previously untreated NSCLC with a acceptable toxicity.