全麻下单极电刀切除扁桃体90例疗效观察

目的 探讨全麻下运用单极电刀实施扁桃体切除术的临床疗效。方法 将行扁桃体切除术的患者180例随机平均分为两组,术前全身麻醉,实验组（A组）行单极电刀全程切除双侧扁桃体,对照组（B组）采用传统扁桃体剥离术,对两组的手术时间、出血量、白膜脱离时间及术后疼痛程度等进行比较。结果 A组术中出血量、手术时间较B组明显减少,术后疼痛时间也较B有所降低,但是白膜脱落时间稍长。结论 全麻下单极电刀扁桃体切除术有操作简便、视野清楚、手术时间短、术中出血极少等优势。     

低温等离子辅助与电刀单极电凝扁桃体切除术的应用体会

目的通过与单极电凝扁桃体切除术的比较,探讨低温等离子技术在扁桃体切除术中的应用价值及优点。方法将2013年1月~2015年12月在我科住院行扁桃体切除术74例患者分成低温等离子切除术A组、电刀单极电凝术B组,记录扁桃体切除的手术时间、术中出血量及术后疼痛评分。结果所有患者术中经过顺利,术中无腺体残留,低温等离子组手术时间短、术中出血少、术后疼痛较轻,与电刀单极电凝术组比较差异均有统计学意义(P值均0.05)。结论与电刀相比,低温等离子辅助下扁桃体切除术具有术中操作方便、手术时间及术中出血少、术后疼痛轻、微创安全等特点,值得临床推广。     

超声刀扁桃体切除术的临床病理研究

目的　探讨超声刀扁桃体切除术的临床应用价值。方法　将40例需行扁桃体切除术的患者分为2组,采用自身对照。A组30例,患者右侧行超声刀扁桃体切除术,左侧行传统扁桃体剥离术;B组10例,右侧行超声刀扁桃体切除术,左侧行针式电刀扁桃体切除术。记录患者左右两侧的手术时间、术中出血量、白膜开始脱落的时间、术后出血发生率及疼痛评分。光学显微镜下观察扁桃体组织的损伤程度并测量其损伤深度。结果　A组超声刀的术中出血量、手术时间、术后疼痛均优于传统手术,但白膜开始脱落的时间稍延迟,差异有统计学意义;B组超声刀的术中出血和手术时间优于针式电刀,而术后疼痛、白膜开始脱落时间两者相比差异无统计学意义;两组患者的术后原发性及继发性出血率差异无统计学意义;3种术式对扁桃体组织的热损伤深度中位数分别为0.60、0.25、0.53 mm,差异有统计学意义。结论　超声刀扁桃体切除术是一种安全、有效的手术方式,值得临床推广应用。     

单极电刀电凝模式切除儿童扁桃体的临床研究

目的通过与传统剥离法扁桃体切除术比较,探讨单极电刀电凝模式(以下称凝切法)切除儿童扁桃体的临床意义。方法对30例需行双侧扁桃体切除术的儿童患者,采用同体异侧对比的方法,按照随机方案一侧扁桃体采用凝切法切除、另一侧采用剥离法切除;分别记录双侧扁桃体的切除时间、止血时间、总手术时间、术中出血量,并观察术中创面损伤、术后白膜生长、咽痛反应等,并对两组数据进行统计分析。结果凝切法与剥离法的切除时间分别为(6.5±2.6)min和(5.6±2.7)min,两种手术方法切除扁桃体的时间差异无统计学意义(P=0.14)。凝切法的止血时间、总手术时间、术中出血量分别为(2.5±2.8)min、(9.0±4.3)min、(6.0±6.8)ml,剥离法的分别为(7.7±3.9)min、(13.2±5.6)min、(18.9±8.8)ml,两种方法在止血时间、总手术时间、术中出血量方面的差异均有统计学意义(P=0.00),凝切法治疗儿童扁桃体肥大疗效明显优于剥离法。凝切法侧的肌纤维损伤积分优于剥离法,其差异具有统计学意义(Z=-4.916,P=0.00)。术后两组白膜生长情况和咽痛比较无明显差异。结论与传统的扁桃体剥离法相比,凝切法的术野清晰、手术时间短、术中出血量少、手术对组织的损伤轻。单极电刀电凝模式儿童扁桃体切除术安全、高效,值得临床推广使用。     

三种不同扁桃体切除术疗效比较

目的 探讨比较冷器械切除+缝合术、单极电凝切除术、等离子射频术三种不同手术方法切除扁桃体的疗效。 方法 将扁桃体切除术患者分为三组,冷器械切除+缝合术(A组)65例;单极电凝切除术(B组)40例;等离子射频切除术(C组)38例。记录扁桃体切除手术总时间、术中出血量、疼痛评分,术后复查时观察扁桃体白膜状况。 结果 A、B、C三组的平均手术时间分别为58.8 min、27.0 min、23.7 min;术中平均出血量分别为34.2 mL、16.1 mL、12.5 mL;术后3 h和术后第1天的疼痛评分之间,差异均有统计学意义。 结论 与冷器械切除+缝合术和单极电凝切除术相比,等离子射频术切除扁桃体费用较高,但其手术时间短,术中出血量少,术后疼痛程度小。     

低温等离子射频消融术行成人扁桃体切除的疗效观察

目的对比研究低温等离子射频消融术切除成人扁桃体的临床疗效和安全性。方法选择该院2013年6月至2016年8月收治的行双侧扁桃体切除术的60例成人患者为研究对象。将其列为观察组33例和对照组27例。对照组患者行传统双扁桃体剥离切除术治疗。观察组采用双扁桃体低温等离子射频消融切除术治疗。比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、疼痛消退时间,及术后并发症发生情况,并随诊六个月评价疗效。结果观察组患者在术中出血量、手术时间、疼痛消退时间及术后并发症的发生率均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论低温等离子射频消融术切除成人扁桃体具有手术时间短、术中出血量少、疼痛消退快、安全高效等优点,比传统手术有优势。     

两种扁桃体切除方法的临床观察

目的比较两种不同扁桃体切除及止血方法的优缺点。方法将诊治的90例扁桃体切除术患者随机分为等离子手术组（A组）和传统手术组（B组）,每组各45例,所有手术均由同一术者完成。等离子手术组用低温等离子法切除扁桃体并止血;传统手术组则采用常规扁桃体剥离并用双极电凝止血。记录切除双侧扁桃体所需时间和出血量;术后第1天起每日记录患者咽部疼痛评分情况,连续10 d;术后第10天观察并记录扁桃体窝内的白膜状况。结果A、B两组手术总时间分别为（18.0±1.6）min、（43.5±3.4）min,术中总出血量分别为（9.3±1.3）ml、（53.8±5.5）ml,两组间差异均具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;两组患者术后1周内疼痛指数差异比较具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,1周后疼痛指数比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）;A、B两组术后出血发生病例数分别为3例、4例,出血发生率比较差异具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,术后比较,A、B两组白膜与扁桃体窝面积比分别为（43.8±6.6）%、（40.5±5.1）%,两组之间差异无统计学意义,但等离子组白膜较为清洁。结论与传统扁桃体剥离法比较,低温等离子法切除扁桃体具有手术损伤小、术中出血少、术后疼痛轻、恢复好等优点,可作为扁桃体切除手术的首选。     

单极电刀扁桃体切除术的临床应用

近年来，随着科学技术的发展，激光、低温等离子射频、超声刀等方法被应用于扁桃体切除术，在控制术中出血，缩短手术时间方面显示出一定的优势，但也各有其优缺点，而单极电刀行扁桃体切除术在临床上报道并不多。为了进一步探讨单极电刀行扁桃体切除术的临床应用价值，我科自2008年3月～2009年1月对66例行扁桃体切除术患者随机进行了传统剥离法和单极电刀法行扁桃体切除术，并就两种手术方法术中出血量、手术时间、术后伪膜生长、术区疼痛反应等进行了对照观察，现报道如下。     

超声刀辅助悬雍垂腭咽成形术的疗效评价与应用价值

目的 探讨应用超声刀进行悬雍垂腭咽成形术（UPPP）治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征（OSAHS）的效果及应用价值。 方法 将需行UPPP的OSAHS患者随机分成超声刀组（A组）及对照组（B组）各20例。A组在静吸复合麻醉下,应用剪型超声刀进行扁桃体切除及悬雍垂腭咽成形术;B组应用传统方法行扁桃体剥离及悬雍垂腭咽成形术。对比两组患者的术中出血量、手术时间、术后疼痛程度、术后效果以及并发症的情况。结果 A组术中出血量明显少于B组,术时缩短明显,术后疼痛及术后并发症情况差异无统计学意义。结论 超声刀辅助下悬雍垂腭咽成形术术中出血少,手术时间明显缩短。     

地塞米松在成人扁桃体切除术后镇痛中的应用研究

目的 研究地塞米松在成人扁桃体切除术后镇痛中的应用效果。方法 选取行双侧扁桃体切除术的成人患者97例为研究对象,随机分为实验组（应用地塞米松）和对照组（不应用地塞米松组）。记录患者自手术当天至术后第6天的每日局部疼痛情况并进行评分。结果 在手术当天至术后4天,实验组的术后局部疼痛程度比对照组有较明显的减轻,差异有统计学意义;但在术后第5、6天,两组差异无统计学意义。结论 成人扁桃体切除术后应用地塞米松,可以较好地减轻手术当天至术后第4天的疼痛。     

低温等离子刀扁桃体切除术与传统扁桃体剥离术疗效的比较

目的:比较分析低温等离子刀扁桃体切除术与传统扁桃体剥离术的疗效。方法:将64例慢性扁桃体炎患者随机分为传统扁桃体剥离术(传统手术组)和低温等离子刀扁桃体切除术(等离子手术组)2组。传统手术组39例采用传统扁桃体剥离术治疗,等离子手术组25例采用低温等离子刀扁桃体切除术治疗。分析2组手术方式在手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛时间、术后出血发生概率上有无差异。结果:传统手术组与等离子手术组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛时间上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组术后出血发生概率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:低温等离子刀扁桃体切除术较传统扁桃体剥离术手术时间短,术中出血少,术后疼痛轻,恢复快,安全性高。     

等离子扁桃体切除术与单极电刀扁桃体切除术的Meta分析

目的通过Meta分析的方法对等离子与单极电刀扁桃体切除术的效率、疗效及安全性进行比较,为临床治疗选择提供依据。方法电子检索Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane Library、维普、清华同方、万方、中国生物医学等数据库,获取等离子扁桃体切除术与单极电刀扁桃体切除术前瞻性随机对照研究的相关资料。用RevMan5．2统计软件对两种术式的术后出血、术后疼痛、手术时间、术中出血、术后恢复等指标进行分析比较,并进行系统评价及Meta分析。结果共有10篇文献（合计病例716例）纳入本研究。合并统计结果表明,两种术式的术后出血率[OR=1．02,95％C1（0．51,2．03）]、术后疼痛[SMD=-0．55,95％CI（-1．19,0．08）]、手术时间[SMD=0．60,95％C1（-0．08,1．28）]及术中出血量[SMD=0．34,95％c,（-0．02,0．69）]比较,差异均无统计学意义。术后活动恢复两者相当,等离子组患者能更快恢复正常饮食。结论相对单极电刀扁桃体切除术,等离子扁桃体切除术后饮食恢复较快;在术后出血、术后疼痛、手术时间、术中出血及术后活动恢复等方面无显著优势。     

全麻下单极电刀切除扁桃体的疗效观察

目的观察并总结我科在全麻下使用单极电刀切除扁桃体的临床疗效。方法回顾我科自2013年09月至2018年7月收治的90例符合扁桃体切除手术指征的患者,随机分为对照组和实验组,每组45例。均在全麻下,对照组采用传统剥离的方法切除扁桃体,而实验组采用单极电刀切除扁桃体。对比两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛时间、伪膜生长等情况。结果相对于传统剥离术,单极电刀切除扁桃体的方式具有手术安全、手术时间更短、出血量更少、视野清楚的优势。结论单极电刀切除扁桃体的方法具有手术时间短、创伤小、恢复快以及手术疗效确切的优点,值得临床推广应用。     

Coblation vs. Electrocautery Tonsillectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults

Objectives

Coblation is operated in low temperature, so it is proposed that tonsillectomy with coblation involves less postoperative pain and allows accelerated healing of the tonsillar fossae compared with other methods involving heat driven processes. However, the results of the previous studies showed that the effect of coblation tonsillectomy has been equivocal in terms of postoperative pain and hemorrhage. Though, most of the previous studies which evaluated coblation tonsillectomy were performed in children. Recently, electrocautery tonsillectomy has been used most widely because of the reduced intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative time compared to other techniques. This prospective study compared intraoperative records and postoperative clinical outcomes in adolescents and adults following coblation and electrocautery tonsillectomies.

Methods

Eighty patients over 16 years of age with histories of recurrent tonsillitis were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated into coblation (n=40) and electrocautery tonsillectomy groups (n=40). All operations were performed by one surgeon who was skilled in both surgical techniques. Intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes were checked.

Results

Postoperative pain and otalgia were not significantly different between the two groups; however, there was a tendency towards reduced pain and otalgia in the coblation group. More cotton balls for swabbing the operative field were used introoperatively in the electrocautery group (P=0.00). There was no significant difference in postoperative hemorrhage, wound healing, commencement of a regular diet, and foreign body sensation between the groups.

Conclusion

Only cotton use, which represented the amount of blood loss, was less in the coblation tonsillectomy group. Coblation tonsillectomy warrants further study with respect to the decreased postoperative pain and otalgia.     

双极电凝在全身麻醉下扁桃体摘除术中的应用

目的 探讨双极电凝在全身麻醉下扁桃体摘除术中的应用效果。方法 全身麻醉下采用双极电凝、单极电刀与传统剥离法实施扁桃体摘除,三种术式共实施扁桃体摘除65例。比较各术式对应的手术时间、术中出血量及术后并发症、疼痛程度及恢复时间。结果 用双极电凝镊行扁桃体摘除在包埋型扁桃体、扁桃体周围明显粘连患者中与单极电刀及传统的剥离法扁桃体摘除相比,术时短,术中出血少,术后并发症发生率低。结论 全身麻醉下,采用双极电凝扁桃体摘除手术尤其适用于包埋型扁桃体以及扁桃体周围明显粘连的患者。     

The comparison of bleeding and pain after tonsillectomy in bipolar electrocautery vs cold dissection

ObjectiveAlthough tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgeries performed in pediatric, it has potential major complications such as pain and bleeding. This study aimed to compare the bleeding and pain after tonsillectomy in bipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy versus cold dissection.MethodsThis double blind clinical trial was conducted on 70 pediatric patients who were candidate of tonsillectomy. Patients were divided into two groups of including bipolar cautery (BC) and cold dissection (CD). operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative bleeding and pain were evaluated in the current study.ResultsIn both of the CD and BC groups, no significant difference was found in terms of sex and age. The average amount of the intraoperative blood loss in BC group was 14.086 ± 5.013 ml and in CD group was 26.14 ± 4.46 ml (p. v = 0.0001). The mean time of operation in BC group was 19 ± 2.89 min and in CD group was 29.31 ± 5.29 min (p. v = 0.0001).patients were evaluated in terms of pain on the first, third, fifth, and seventh days after the operation. No statistically significant difference was found between two groups.Moreover, Compared pain scores in all times across two groups, no significant difference was found.In terms of postoperative bleeding, none of the patients in both groups had bleeding during follow-up.ConclusionOur study showed that bipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy can significantly reduce the operation time and intraoperative blood loss; however, postoperative pain and blood loss were similar in both techniques. We recommend bipolar electrocautery as the most suitable alternative method for tonsillectomy, especially in children.     

Coblation versus unipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study in adult patients

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the coblation tonsillectomy (subcapsular dissection) results in less postoperative pain, equivalent intraoperative blood loss, equivalent postoperative hemorrhage rates, and faster healing compared with tonsillectomy was performed using unipolar electrocautery in adult patients. STUDY DESIGN: The authors conducted a prospective clinical trial. METHODS: Forty-eight patients underwent tonsillectomy and were randomly assigned to have one tonsil removed with coblation and the other with unipolar electrocautery. Outcome measures included time to remove each tonsil, intraoperative blood loss, patient-reported pain, postoperative hemorrhage, and amount of healing 2 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Mean time to remove a single tonsil with coblation and electrocautery was 8.22 minutes and 6.33 minutes, respectively (P = .011). Mean intraoperative blood loss for each technique was less than 10 mL. Postoperative pain was significantly less with coblation as compared with electrocautery: 18.6% less painful during the first week of recovery. Seventy percent of blinded patients identified the coblation side as less painful during the overall 14-day convalescent period. Postoperative hemorrhage rates (2.1% for coblation and 6.2% for electrocautery) were not significantly different. No difference in tonsillar fossa healing was observed between the two techniques 2 weeks after surgery. During nine of the 48 surgeries, wires on the tip of the coblation handpiece experienced thinning to the point of discontinuity while removing a single tonsil. CONCLUSIONS: Coblation subcapsular tonsillectomy was less painful than electrocautery tonsillectomy in this 48-patient group. On average, intraoperative blood loss was less than 10 mL for both techniques. Postoperative hemorrhage rates and the degree of tonsillar fossa healing were similar between the two techniques. The coblation handpiece experienced degradation of vital wires in 18% of cases necessitating the use of a second, new handpiece.     

Post‐operative pain following coblation or monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy in children: a prospective,single‐blinded,randomised comparison

Clin. Otolaryngol. 2011, 36 , 468–474 Objective: To compare post‐operative pain following tonsillectomy by either coblation or monopolar electrocautery in children. Design: A parallel‐designed, prospective, single‐blinded, randomised trial. Setting: Ambulatory surgical facility. Study participants: Eighty otherwise healthy paediatric patients undergoing coblation or electrocautery tonsillectomy by a fellowship‐trained paediatric otolaryngologist. Main outcome measures: (i) The number of post‐operative days with severe pain based on subjective qualification by the caretaker, (ii) post‐operative days with pain rated ≥5 on a scale of 1–10, (iii) post‐operative days requiring oral paracetamol/acetaminophen with codeine solution and (iv) post‐operative days until resumption of a regular diet were assessed and recorded daily using a post‐operative pain survey as a form of daily diary that was returned at the 2‐week follow‐up visit. Results: Patients were consecutively enrolled into two groups of 40 patients. Average ages were 5.2 years for coblation tonsillectomy and 6.0 years for electrocautery tonsillectomy. The average number of post‐operative days with severe pain was 4.2 for coblation and 5.9 for electrocautery (P = 0.006), days rating pain ≥5 were 3.6 for coblation and 4.8 for electrocautery (P = 0.037), days of codeine use were 2.5 for coblation and 2.9 for electrocautery (P = 0.324), and days until resumption of a regular diet were 5.2 for coblation and 6.2 for electrocautery (0.329). Conclusions: Coblation tonsillectomy may reduce post‐operative pain and the time until resumption of a regular diet compared to electrocautery tonsillectomy.     

The ultrasonically activated scalpel versus bipolar diathermy for tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized trial

Among patients undergoing tonsillectomy, the ultrasonic scalpel has been reported to lead to less intraoperative blood loss than cold dissection, and less postoperative pain and faster recovery than monopolar electrocautery. However, the ultrasonic scalpel has not been compared with bipolar diathermy. The present study was a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial, comparing these two techniques with respect to postoperative pain. Twenty-one adults underwent tonsillectomy on one side using the ultrasonic scalpel, and on the other using bipolar diathermy. Pain scores were obtained on postoperative days 1, 2, 7 and week 3. There was no difference between the two treatments at any of the time points (P = 0.6047, 0.4018, 0.6047 and 0.5000, respectively). Inability to control bleeding with the ultrasonic scalpel resulted in the rescue use of an alternative technique of haemostasis in 14 cases. We conclude that the use of the ultrasonic scalpel in adult tonsillectomy is likely to be limited by its substantial costs and difficulties with haemostasis.