Schedule-induced ethanol self-administration in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice

BACKGROUND: The purpose of these experiments was to provide an initial investigation into ethanol self-administration elicited in the schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP) paradigm. METHODS: Mature male mice were food deprived to between 80 and 85% of their baseline weight and received 20 daily 1 hr SIP test sessions in which a food pellet (20 mg) was delivered on a fixed-time 60 sec schedule. In different groups, the acquisition of drinking 5% (v/v) ethanol solution (experiment 1) or water (experiment 2) was recorded along with other behaviors that occurred in the test chambers. RESULTS: Results indicated that C57BL/6J mice drank significantly more ethanol than DBA/2J mice and that C57 mice achieved blood alcohol concentrations as high as 300 mg/dl. Blood alcohol concentrations were consistently correlated with g/kg ethanol intake. The groups did not differ in consumption of water. SIP test sessions using higher concentrations of ethanol (10-20% v/v, experiment 1) or sucrose solutions (0.1-2% w/v, experiment 2) then were performed. Group differences in ethanol consumption were maintained at all ethanol concentrations. Although DBAs drank more of a low concentration of sucrose (0.1%), when expressed as g/kg, sucrose intake was equivalent in the two strains at all concentrations. Analysis of the time course of drinking clearly showed that this behavior was adjunctive in nature. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the effectiveness of this procedure in inducing ethanol self-administration and its utility for investigating the genetic bases of vulnerability toward excessive ethanol consumption.     

Induction and maintenance of ethanol self-administration in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis): long-term characterization of sex and individual differences

BACKGROUND: Investigations of oral ethanol self-administration in nonhuman primates have revealed important parallels with human alcohol use and abuse, yet many fundamental questions concerning the individual risk to, and the biological basis of, excessive ethanol consumption remain unanswered. Moreover, many conditions of access to ethanol in nonhuman primate research are largely unexplored. This set of experiments extends within- and across-session exposure to ethanol to more fully characterize individual differences in oral ethanol self-administration. METHODS: Eight male and eight female adult cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were exposed to daily oral ethanol self-administration sessions for approximately 9 months. During the first 3 months, a fixed-time (FT) schedule of food delivery was used to induce the consumption of an allotted dose of ethanol in 16-hr sessions. Subsequently, the FT schedule was suspended, and ethanol was available ad libitum for 6 months in 16- or 22-hr sessions. RESULTS: Cynomolgus monkeys varied greatly in their propensity to self-administer ethanol, with sex and individual differences apparent within 10 days of ethanol exposure. Over the last 3 months of ethanol access, individual average ethanol intakes ranged from 0.6 to 4.0 g/kg/day, resulting in blood ethanol concentrations from 5 to 235 mg/dl. Males drank approximately 1.5-fold more than females. In addition, heavy-, moderate-, and light-drinking phenotypes were identified by using daily ethanol intake and the percentage of daily calories obtained from ethanol as criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Cynomolgus monkeys displayed a wide intersubject range of oral ethanol self-administration with a procedure that used a uniform and prolonged induction that restricted early exposure to ethanol and subsequently allowed unlimited access to ethanol. There were sex and stable individual differences in the propensity of monkeys to consume ethanol, indicating that this species will be important in characterizing risk factors associated with heavy-drinking phenotypes.     

Suppression of Alcohol Intake after Administration of the Chinese Herbal Medicine, NPI-028, and Its Derivatives

The Chinese herbal medicine, NPI-028, has been used for centuries in China to counteract alcohol intoxication. The present study used a number of different experimental conditions to determine whether NPI-028 and its derivatives might selectively influence alcohol intake in rodents that naturally exhibit high alcohol intakes. It was determined that intraperitoneal (IP) injections of NPI-028 (0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 g/kg) suppressed alcohol intake by up to 30% in both alcohol-preferring P and Fawn-Hooded (FH) rats during a continuous access schedule. These injections did not significantly affect food or water intakes, nor did the highest dose of NPI-028 (1 g/kg) alter blood ethanol levels after an IP injection of 2.5 g/kg of ethanol. In P rats, it was found that NPI-028 was orally active with the dose of 1.5 g/kg having a greater effect on ethanol intake than the 1.0 g/kg dose; once again, food and water intakes were not significantly altered. In FH rats maintained on a limited access schedule (1 hr/day), alcohol intake was completely abolished by 1.5 g/kg of NPI-028. Chronic IP administration of NPI-028 (0.75 g/kg) for four consecutive days in FH rats maintained on a continuous access schedule did not lead to any diminution of its alcohol-suppressant effects. Thus, NPI-028 has significant effects on alcohol intake without much effect on water and food intake, and tolerance does not readily develop to these effects. The IP administration of a partially purified extract (NPI-031) of NPI-028, obtained by countercurrent chromatography, also dose-dependently suppressed ethanol intake in FH rats, but the highest dose (200 mg/kg) also significantly decreased food intake. Finally, the IP administration of puerarin (NPI-31G), an isoflavone isolated from NPI-031 by countercurrent chromatography, significantly reduced ethanol intake in FH rats without affecting food or water intake. Therefore, NPI-028 and one of its pure components, NPI-031G, selectively reduced ethanol intake in alcohol-preferring rats.     

Intermittent access to 20% ethanol induces high ethanol consumption in Long-Evans and Wistar rats

Background: There has been some difficulty getting standard laboratory rats to voluntarily consume large amounts of ethanol without the use of initiation procedures. It has previously been shown that standard laboratory rats will voluntarily consume high levels of ethanol if given intermittent‐access to 20% ethanol in a 2‐bottle‐choice setting [ Wise, Psychopharmacologia 29 (1973), 203 ]. In this study, we have further characterized this drinking model. Methods: Ethanol‐naïve Long–Evans rats were given intermittent‐access to 20% ethanol (three 24‐hour sessions per week). No sucrose fading was needed and water was always available ad libitum. Ethanol consumption, preference, and long‐term drinking behaviors were investigated. Furthermore, to pharmacologically validate the intermittent‐access 20% ethanol drinking paradigm, the efficacy of acamprosate and naltrexone in decreasing ethanol consumption were compared with those of groups given continuous‐access to 10 or 20% ethanol, respectively. Additionally, ethanol consumption was investigated in Wistar and out‐bred alcohol preferring (P) rats following intermittent‐access to 20% ethanol. Results: The intermittent‐access 20% ethanol 2‐bottle‐choice drinking paradigm led standard laboratory rats to escalate their ethanol intake over the first 5 to 6 drinking sessions, reaching stable baseline consumption of high amounts of ethanol (Long–Evans: 5.1 ± 0.6; Wistar: 5.8 ± 0.8 g/kg/24 h, respectively). Furthermore, the cycles of excessive drinking and abstinence led to an increase in ethanol preference and increased efficacy of both acamprosate and naltrexone in Long–Evans rats. P‐rats initiate drinking at a higher level than both Long–Evans and Wistar rats using the intermittent‐access 20% ethanol paradigm and showed a trend toward a further escalation in ethanol intake over time (mean ethanol intake: 6.3 ± 0.8 g/kg/24 h). Conclusion: Standard laboratory rats will voluntarily consume ethanol using the intermittent‐access 20% ethanol drinking paradigm without the use of any initiation procedures. This model promises to be a valuable tool in the alcohol research field.     

Effects of long-term episodic access to ethanol on the expression of an alcohol deprivation effect in low alcohol-consuming rats

Background: The alcohol‐preferring (P) and ‐nonpreferring (NP) and high alcohol–drinking (HAD) and low alcohol–drinking (LAD) rats have been selectively bred for divergent preference for ethanol over water. In addition, both P and HAD rats display an alcohol deprivation effect (ADE). This study was undertaken to test whether the NP, LAD‐1, and LAD‐2 lines of rats could display an ADE as well. Method: Adult female NP, LAD‐1, and LAD‐2 rats were given concurrent access to multiple concentrations of ethanol [5, 10, 15% (v/v)] and water in an ADE paradigm involving an initial 6 weeks of 24‐hr access to ethanol, followed by four cycles of 2 weeks of deprivation from and 2 weeks of re‐exposure to ethanol (5, 10, and 15%). A control group had continuous access to the ethanol concentrations (5, 10, and 15%) and water through the end of the fourth re‐exposure period. Results: For NP rats, a preference for the highest ethanol concentration (15%) was evident by the end of the fifth week of access (～60% of total ethanol fluid intake). Contrarily, LAD rats did not display a marked preference for any one concentration of ethanol. All three lines displayed an ADE after repeated cycles of re‐exposure to ethanol, with the general ranking of intake being LAD‐1 > NP > LAD‐2 (e.g., for the first day of reinstatement of the third re‐exposure cycle, intakes were 6.5, 2.9, and 2.4 g/kg/day compared with baseline values of 3.1, 2.0, and 1.3 g/kg/day for each line, respectively). By the 13th week, rats from all three lines, with a ranking of LAD‐1 > NP > LAD‐2, were drinking more ethanol (3.3, 2.2, and 2.0 g/kg/day, respectively) compared with their consumption during the first week of access (～1.1 g/kg/day for all three lines). Conclusion: These data indicate that access to multiple concentrations of ethanol and exposure to multiple deprivation cycles can partially overcome a genetic predisposition of NP, LAD‐1, and LAD‐2 rats for low alcohol consumption. In addition, the findings suggest that genetic control of low alcohol consumption in rats is not associated with the inability to display an ADE.     

Ethanol and sucrose seeking and consumption following repeated administration of the GABA(B) agonist baclofen in rats

BACKGROUND: Baclofen, a GABA(B) agonist, has been found to decrease alcohol craving in humans and to nonselectively decrease ethanol intake in some rodent models. This experiment assessed the effects of repeated administration of baclofen on reinforcer seeking and consumption using the sipper tube appetitive/consummatory model of ethanol access. METHODS: Subjects were divided into 2 groups and trained to make 30 lever press responses that resulted in access to either 10% ethanol or 2% sucrose in a sipper tube-drinking spout for 20 minutes. Three doses of baclofen were tested (0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg) and each drug treatment was assessed using the following schedule: Monday, saline; Tuesday to Thursday, baclofen; and Friday, saline. RESULTS: The low dose of baclofen had no effect on the seeking or intake of either sucrose or ethanol, and the 1.0 mg/kg dose also had no effect on the appetitive, seeking response. However, the 1.0 mg/kg dose significantly decreased sucrose intake (from an average of 0.56 to 0.41 g/kg) and significantly increased ethanol intake (from an average of 0.77 to 1.00 g/kg). Similarly, the high dose (3.0 mg/kg) decreased sucrose intake and had a tendency to increase ethanol intake while decreasing both sucrose seeking and ethanol seeking. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, baclofen treatment affected reinforcer intake at doses that had no effect on reinforcer seeking, and effective doses decreased both sucrose seeking and ethanol seeking. Moreover, the effects on reinforcer intake were disparate, in that baclofen increased ethanol drinking and decreased sucrose drinking. The nonspecific effects of baclofen suggest that the GABA(B) system may be involved in general consummatory or drinking behaviors and does not appear to specifically regulate ethanol-motivated responding.     

Effects of Naltrexone and Ro 15-4513 on a Multiple Schedule of Ethanol and Tang Self-Administration

BACKGROUND: Both the opioid antagonist, naltrexone, and GABAA/benzodiazepine-site negative modulator, Ro 15-4513, decrease ethanol self-administration in rodents and nonhuman primates. However, the selectivity of these drugs for decreasing ethanol self-administration relative to reducing responding maintained by other reinforcers in primates is not clear. The present study used a multiple schedule self-administration procedure in cynomolgus monkeys to examine the selectivity of naltrexone and Ro 15-4513 for reducing ethanol self-administration relative to an orange flavored sugar-free sweetened solution (Sugar-free Tang). METHODS: Six adult cynomolgus monkeys were trained to self-administer 4% (w/v) ethanol and 4% or 6% (w/v) Tang under a multiple schedule of liquid access. The effect of acute administration of naltrexone (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3 mg/kg) was examined. The effect of 15 days of chronic, 1 mg/kg naltrexone on ethanol and Tang self-administration was then examined in four monkeys. Acute administration of Ro 15-4513 (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3 mg/kg) as well as 15 days of chronic administration of 0.1 mg/kg Ro 15-4513 was also examined in four monkeys. RESULTS: Ethanol and Tang were self-administered at similar volumes and patterns under baseline conditions. Acute naltrexone administration significantly decreased total session ethanol and Tang intake as well as the number and volume of ethanol and Tang drinks. Chronic naltrexone also significantly decreased ethanol and Tang intake. Ethanol, but not Tang, drink volume was significantly decreased by chronic 1 mg/kg naltrexone pretreatment. The number of ethanol and Tang drinks and drink duration were not significantly decreased by chronic naltrexone. Acute Ro 15-4513 pretreatment significantly decreased ethanol and Tang intake, mean drinks and median drink duration. Chronic 0.1 mg/kg Ro 15-4513 pretreatment significantly decreased total ethanol intake only during the first week of pretreatment, but it significantly decreased Tang intake for all 3 pretreatment weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to rodent studies, acute and chronic naltrexone and Ro 15-4513 reduced ethanol and Tang intake in cynomolgus monkeys. However, unlike rodent studies, neither drug showed selectivity for reducing ethanol intake compared with a comparison reinforcer. These differences highlight the need for testing putative ethanol abuse treatment drugs under diverse conditions and multiple species before undertaking human clinical trials.     

Persistent escalation of alcohol drinking in C57BL/6J mice with intermittent access to 20% ethanol

Background: Intermittent access (IA) to drugs of abuse, as opposed to continuous access, is hypothesized to induce a kindling‐type transition from moderate to escalated use, leading to dependence. Intermittent 24‐hour cycles of ethanol access and deprivation can generate high levels of voluntary ethanol drinking in rats. Methods: The current study uses C57BL/6J mice (B6) in an IA to 20% ethanol protocol to escalate ethanol drinking levels. Adult male and female B6 mice were given IA to 20% ethanol on alternating days of the week with water available ad libitum. Ethanol consumption during the initial 2 hours of access was compared with a short‐term, limited access “binge” drinking procedure, similar to drinking‐in‐the‐dark (DID). B6 mice were also assessed for ethanol dependence with handling‐induced convulsion, a reliable measure of withdrawal severity. Results: After 3 weeks, male mice given IA to ethanol achieved high stable levels of ethanol drinking in excess of 20 g/kg/24 h, reaching above 100 mg/dl blood ethanol concentrations, and showed a significantly higher ethanol preference than mice given continuous access to ethanol. Also, mice given IA drank about twice as much as DID mice in the initial 2‐hour access period. B6 mice that underwent the IA protocol for longer periods of time displayed more severe signs of alcohol withdrawal. Additionally, female B6 mice were given IA to ethanol and drank significantly more than males (ca. 30 g/kg/24 h). Discussion: The IA method in B6 mice is advantageous because it induces escalated, voluntary, and preferential per os ethanol intake, behavior that may mimic a cardinal feature of human alcohol dependence, though the exact nature and site of ethanol acting in the brain and blood as a result of IA has yet to be determined.     

Subjective measures of binge drinking and alcohol-specific adverse health outcomes: a prospective cohort study

Aim To determine the performance of subjectively defined intoxications, hangovers and alcohol‐induced pass‐outs in identifying drinkers at risk for adverse health outcomes. Design Prospective population‐based cohort study. Setting Working‐aged Finnish general population. Participants A total of 21 204 alcohol‐drinking men and women aged 20–24, 30–34, 40–44 and 50–54 years at baseline who participated in the Health and Social Support (HeSSup) postal survey in 1998. Measurements Binge drinking was measured by subjectively defined intoxications/drunkenness, hangovers and alcohol‐induced pass‐outs. Hazardous drinking was defined according to Finnish guidelines as weekly total intake of >287 g of ethanol for men, and for women > 191 g of ethanol (≥24 and ≥16 standard drinks, respectively). Study participants were followed‐up for 7 years for alcohol‐specific hospitalizations and deaths. Proportional hazard models and areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC) were used to analyse the data. Findings Of the drinkers, 6.5% exceeded the weekly limit for hazardous drinking, and 1.5% experienced the alcohol‐specific end‐point during the follow‐up. Subjective intoxications, hangovers and alcohol‐induced pass‐outs all predicted future alcohol‐specific diagnoses independently of average intake and of several other potential confounders. In identifying baseline hazardous drinking, subjective intoxications had a superior performance in relation to other subjective measures of binge drinking. In identifying future alcohol‐specific hospitalizations or death, subjective intoxications had also the best performance, but this was not significantly different from the other binge drinking measures, or average intake. Conclusions Subjectively defined intoxications, hangovers and alcohol‐induced pass‐outs are population‐level proxy measures of at‐risk drinking patterns.     

Relationship between ethanol's acute locomotor effects and ethanol self-administration in male Long-Evans rats

Background: Human studies have suggested an important relationship between ethanol sensitivity and risk of alcoholism. These studies have led some to hypothesize that a low initial sensitivity to ethanol’s depressant effects and/or an elevated response to ethanol’s stimulant effects may represent important risk factors associated with the development of abusive drinking behavior. Unfortunately, elucidating neurobiologic mechanisms that may underlie these relationships between ethanol sensitivity and ethanol drinking have been hampered by difficulties in modeling some of these interactions in animals. In this study, we re‐examined some of these relationships in an outbred strain of rats using continuous access two‐bottle choice drinking and a limited‐access operant procedure that engenders pharmacologically relevant levels of ethanol intake and permits the discrete assessment of appetitive and consummatory measures of ethanol drinking behavior. Methods: Twenty‐three male Long‐Evans rats were habituated to a locomotor activity box and then tested for their response to a stimulant (0.5 g/kg) and depressant (1.5 g/kg) ethanol dose. Rats were then trained to complete a lever pressing requirement to gain access to 10% ethanol for 20‐minute sessions conducted 5 d/wk for 5 weeks. Appetitive behavior was assessed after 2.5 and 4.5 weeks using 20‐minute extinction trials in which ethanol was not presented and lever responses were recorded. Home‐cage ethanol preference was also assessed prior to and immediately following the 5‐week self‐administration regimen using a continuous access, two‐bottle choice procedure. Results: A significant increase in home‐cage ethanol preference was observed following the self‐administration procedure, however, neither measure of ethanol preference correlated with average daily ethanol intake during the operant self‐administration sessions or with initial sensitivity to ethanol’s stimulant or depressant effects. Notably, a significant negative correlation was observed between sensitivity to ethanol’s locomotor depressant effect and daily intake during the operant self‐administration sessions. No significant relationships were noted between sensitivity to ethanol’s locomotor effects and extinction responding. Conclusions: The results of these studies suggest that the well‐established relationship between a low level of response to ethanol and increased ethanol consumption reported in human studies can be observed in an outbred rodent strain using a limited‐access operant self‐administration procedure, but not with home‐cage ethanol drinking.     

Increase of Rat Alcohol Drinking Behavior Depends on the Age of Drinking Onset

Background Although alcohol drinking onset in younger people is associated with an increased risk of alcohol-related injuries, other factors, such as habituation and susceptibility to alcohol, in the process of aging have not been adequately examined in animal models. In the present study, we determined whether age of drinking onset affected alcohol drinking behavior and led to alcohol tolerance in experimental animals, and extrapolated some of the findings to human alcohol drinking patterns.
Methods In the first experiment, 18 rats that were naive to alcohol were tested at the age of 1, 4, and 10 months with 4 hr of access to 10% (v/v) alcohol. After the time access tests, these animals (1, 4, and 10 months of age) were housed individually and given free access to 10% alcohol solution and tap water. At 3 and 6 months later, all rats that had experienced alcohol drinking were studied for the voluntary consumption of the alcohol solution, alcohol preference, under the two-bottle method in a second experiment.
Results In the 4-hr alcohol-access test, alcohol intake (g/kg/hr) was significantly increased at 0.5 and 1 hr in 1- and 4-month-old naive rats compared with 10-month-old naive rats. The daily alcohol intake (g/kg/day) of rats with drinking onset at 1 month of age was significantly increased at 3 and 6 months after the voluntary alcohol consumption. The daily alcohol intake in the rats with drinking onset at 4 months of age was significantly increased at 6 months only. However, the daily alcohol intake did not change in the rats with drinking onset at 10 months of age through the alcohol preference test.
Conclusions Alcohol drinking behavior in experimental animals depends on the age of alcohol drinking onset.     

Pregnenolone and ganaxolone reduce operant ethanol self-administration in alcohol-preferring p rats

Background: Neuroactive steroids modulate ethanol intake in several self‐administration models with variable effects. The purpose of this work was to examine the effects of the long‐acting synthetic GABAergic neurosteroid ganaxolone and the endogenous neurosteroid pregnenolone, a precursor of all GABAergic neuroactive steroids, on the maintenance of ethanol self‐administration in an animal model of elevated drinking—the alcohol‐preferring (P) rats. Methods: P rats were trained to self‐administer ethanol (15% v/v) versus water on a concurrent schedule of reinforcement, and the effects of ganaxolone (0 to 30 mg/kg, subcutaneous [SC]) and pregnenolone (0 to 75 mg/kg, intraperitoneal [IP]) were evaluated on the maintenance of ethanol self‐administration. After completion of self‐administration testing, doses of the neuroactive steroids that altered ethanol self‐administration were assessed on spontaneous locomotor activity. Finally, the effect of pregnenolone administration on cerebral cortical levels of the GABAergic neuroactive steroid (3α,5α)‐3‐hydroxypregnan‐20‐one (allopregnanolone, 3α,5α‐THP) was determined in both ethanol‐experienced and ethanol‐inexperienced P rats because pregnenolone is a precursor of these steroids. Results: Ganaxolone produced a dose‐dependent biphasic effect on ethanol reinforcement, as the lowest dose (1 mg/kg) increased and the highest dose (30 mg/kg) decreased ethanol‐reinforced responding. However, the highest ganaxolone dose also produced a nonspecific reduction in locomotor activity. Pregnenolone treatment significantly reduced ethanol self‐administration (50 and 75 mg/kg), without altering locomotor activity. Pregnenolone (50 mg/kg) produced a significant increase in cerebral cortical allopregnanolone levels. This increase was observed in the self‐administration trained animals, but not in ethanol‐naïve P rats. Conclusions: These results indicate that pregnenolone dose‐dependently reduces operant ethanol self‐administration in P rats without locomotor impairment, suggesting that it may have potential as a novel therapeutic for reducing chronic alcohol drinking in individuals that abuse alcohol.     

Motivation for Alcohol Becomes Resistant to Quinine Adulteration After 3 to 4 Months of Intermittent Alcohol Self‐Administration

Background: Continued consumption of alcohol despite deleterious consequences is a hallmark of alcoholism and represents a critical challenge to therapeutic intervention. Previous rat studies showed that enduring alcohol self‐administration despite pairing alcohol with normally aversive stimuli was only observed after very long‐term intake (>8 months). Aversion‐resistant alcohol intake has been previously interpreted to indicate pathological or compulsive motivation to consume alcohol. However, given the time required to model compulsive alcohol seeking in previous studies, there is considerable interest in developing more efficient and quantitative rodent models of aversion‐resistant alcohol self‐administration. Methods: Outbred Wistar rats underwent 3 to 4 months or approximately 1.5 months of intermittent, home‐cage, two‐bottle access (IAA) to 20% alcohol (v/v) or water. Then, after brief operant training, the effect of the bitter‐tasting quinine (0.1 g/l) on the motivation to seek alcohol was quantified via progressive ratio (PR). Motivation for quinine‐adulterated 2% sucrose under PR was assayed in a separate cohort of 3 to 4 months IAA rats. The effects of quinine on home‐cage alcohol consumption in IAA rats and rats with continuous access to alcohol were also examined. Finally, a dose–response for quinine taste preference in IAA and continuous‐access animals was determined. Results: Motivation for alcohol after 3 to 4 months IAA, measured using an operant PR procedure, was not altered by adulteration of alcohol with 0.1 g/l quinine. In contrast, after 3 to 4 months of IAA, motivation for sucrose under PR was significantly reduced by adulteration of sucrose with 0.1 g/l quinine. In addition, motivation for alcohol after only approximately 1.5 months IAA was significantly reduced by adulteration of alcohol with 0.1 g/l quinine. Furthermore, home‐cage alcohol intake by IAA rats was insensitive to quinine at concentrations (0.01, 0.03 g/l) that significantly reduced alcohol drinking in animals with continuous access to alcohol. Finally, no changes in quinine taste preference after 3 to 4 months IAA or continuous access to alcohol were observed. Conclusions: We have developed a novel and technically simple hybrid operant/IAA model in which quinine‐resistant motivation for alcohol is evident after an experimentally tractable period of time (3 to 4 months vs. 8 months). Quinine dramatically reduced sucrose and water intake by IAA rats, indicating that continued responding for alcohol in IAA rats despite adulteration with the normally aversive quinine might reflect maladaptive or compulsive motivation for alcohol. This model could facilitate identification of novel therapeutic interventions for pathological alcohol seeking in humans.     

Ethanol self-administration is regulated by CB1 receptors in the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area in alcohol-preferring AA rats

Background: Endogenous cannabinoids and their receptors, CB1 receptors in particular, have been implicated in mediation of ethanol reinforcement. Previously, suppression of ethanol drinking by CB1 antagonists has been demonstrated in many experimental paradigms. However, the exact mechanism by which CB1 antagonists modulate ethanol drinking remains elusive. In the present study, we assessed the role of CB1 receptors within the key regions of the mesolimbic dopamine pathway, the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA), in regulation of ethanol self‐administration. Methods: Adult male alcohol‐prefer AA rats were trained to self‐administer either 10% (w/v) ethanol or 0.1% (w/v) saccharin under an FR1 schedule during daily 30‐minute sessions. Following stable baseline responding, rats were tested after systemic administration of the CB1 antagonist SR141716A (0 to 10 mg/kg) and the agonist WIN55,212‐2 (0 to 2 mg/kg). Separate groups of rats were implanted with bilateral cannulas aimed at the NAcc or VTA, and tested after microinjections of SR141716A (0 to 3 μg) and WIN55,212‐2 (0 to 5 μg) into the NAcc or VTA. The highest intracerebral doses were tested also in rats responding for a 0.1% saccharin solution. Results: SR141617A dose‐dependently suppressed ethanol responding after systemic administration. Microinjections of SR141617A both into NAcc and VTA attenuated ethanol responding. In addition, intra‐NAcc injections of SR141617A suppressed saccharin intake. Although low doses of systemically given WIN55,212‐2 increased ethanol responding, no effects were seen after WIN55,212‐2 microinjections into NAcc or VTA. Conclusions: Bidirectional changes in ethanol self‐administration by the systematically administered CB1 agonist and antagonist show that ethanol reinforcement is controlled by CB1 receptors in alcohol‐preferring AA rats. Replication of the suppressive effects by CB1 antagonism in the NAcc and VTA suggests that endocannabinoids and their receptors mediate ethanol reinforcement through interaction with the mesolimbic dopamine pathway.     

Low-dose stimulatory effects of ethanol during adolescence in rat lines selectively bred for high alcohol intake

Abstract : Background: The low‐dose stimulatory effect of ethanol (EtOH) in rats has been hypothesized to reflect its hedonic effects and to be associated with a genetic predisposition toward high alcohol preference. To test the hypothesis that phenotypes associated with high alcohol preference in adulthood are also present in adolescent rats at the time of onset of alcohol drinking, the current study examined the effects of EtOH on locomotor activity (LMA) during adolescence in lines of rats selectively bred for divergent alcohol intakes. Methods: Subjects were adolescent (31–40 days of age) rats from the alcohol‐preferring (P) and ‐nonpreferring (NP) lines and from the high–alcohol‐drinking (HAD) and low–alcohol‐drinking (LAD) replicate lines. On day 1, all subjects (n= 8–10/line/gender/dose) received intraperitoneal saline injections and were placed in the activity monitor for 30 min. On day 2, subjects received intraperitoneal saline or 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, or 1.5 g EtOH/kg. Results: The LMA of male and female P rats was increased with low doses (0.25–0.75 g/kg) and decreased at the highest dose (1.5 g/kg) of EtOH. Similar effects were observed with low doses of EtOH on the LMA of HAD‐1 and HAD‐2 rats. None of the EtOH doses stimulated LMA in the NP, LAD‐1, or LAD‐2 rats, although all of the low–alcohol‐intake lines of rats showed decreased LMA at the highest dose of EtOH. Only the P rats among the high–alcohol‐consuming lines of rats showed decreased LMA at the highest dose of EtOH. Conclusion: Selective breeding for high alcohol consumption seems to be associated with increased sensitivity to the low‐dose stimulating effects of EtOH and reduced sensitivity to the high‐dose motor‐impairing effects of ethanol. The expression of these phenotypes emerges during adolescence by the age of onset of alcohol‐drinking behavior.     

Intermittent (every-other-day) drinking induces rapid escalation of ethanol intake and preference in adolescent and adult C57BL/6J mice

Background: Using adult C57BL/6J (B6) mice, we previously developed a procedure that causes a progressive increase in ethanol intake and preference (i.e., alcohol escalation effect) following weekly (intermittent) access to ethanol ( Melendez et al., 2006 ). A limitation of this procedure is that it requires many weeks of testing, which limits its use to study ethanol escalation (i.e., binge‐like drinking) during adolescence. Previous studies have shown that intermittent every‐other‐day (EOD) access to ethanol is sufficient to induce ethanol escalation in rats. The objective of this study was to verify whether EOD access is sufficient to induce escalated levels of ethanol intake and preference in adult and adolescent B6 mice. Methods: Male B6 mice received free‐choice 24‐hour access to 15% ethanol and water on an EOD or daily basis for 2 weeks. Food and water were available at all times. Using adult mice, Experiment 1 characterized the induction of ethanol escalation following EOD access at 6 (i.e., drinking in the dark) and 24‐hour intervals, whereas Experiment 2 determined whether daily drinking reverses escalation induced by EOD drinking. Experiment 3 compared ethanol‐drinking capacity following daily versus EOD drinking in adolescent (P30‐45) and adult (P70‐85) mice. Results: Experiment 1 revealed that EOD drinking leads to a significant (nearly 2‐fold) increase in ethanol intake and preference over mice given daily access. Experiment 2 demonstrated that EOD‐elicited escalation is blocked and subsequently reversed following daily drinking. Experiment 3 revealed that ethanol drinking was greater in adolescent mice compared with adults following daily drinking and EOD (escalated) drinking. Although the escalated levels of ethanol intake were greater in adolescent mice, the rate or onset of escalation was comparable between both age‐groups. Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate that EOD drinking leads to escalation of ethanol intake and preference in adolescent and adult mice. Moreover, our results indicate that daily ethanol reverses ethanol escalation induced by intermittent drinking. The study also revealed that adolescent mice have a greater capacity to drink ethanol under both daily (controlled) and EOD (escalated) conditions, which further supports the notion of adolescent’s susceptibility to heavy drinking.     

Increase in Alcohol Intake,Reduced Flexibility of Alcohol Drinking,and Evidence of Signs of Alcohol Intoxication in Sardinian Alcohol‐Preferring Rats Exposed to Intermittent Access to 20% Alcohol

Background: This study assessed in Sardinian alcohol‐preferring (sP) rats a procedure known to promote alcohol drinking and based on the intermittent (once every other day) access to 2 bottles containing alcohol (20%, v/v) and water, respectively (Wise, 1973). Methods: To this end, sP rats were exposed – under the 2‐bottle choice regimen – to: (i) 10% (v/v) alcohol with continuous access (CA10%; i.e., the procedure under which sP rats had been selectively bred); (ii) 10% (v/v) alcohol with intermittent access (IA10%); (iii) 20% (v/v) alcohol with continuous access (CA20%); (iv) 20% (v/v) alcohol with intermittent access (IA20%; the “Wise” condition) (Experiment 1). Additional experiments assessed the influence of (i) adulteration with quinine of the alcohol solution (Experiment 2) and (ii) concurrent presentation of a saccharin solution (Experiment 3) on alcohol drinking under the CA10% and IA20% conditions. Finally, it was assessed whether alcohol drinking under the CA10% and IA20% conditions resulted in motor incoordination at the Rota‐Rod task, as a possible sign of alcohol intoxication (Experiment 4). Results: Daily alcohol intake markedly escalated in rats exposed to the IA20% condition, averaging 9.0 g/kg (in comparison with the average intake of 6.5 g/kg in the CA10% rat group). CA20% and IA10% rats displayed intermediate values of daily alcohol intake between those of CA10% and IA20% rats. Alcohol intake was virtually abolished by addition of quinine or by concurrent presentation of the saccharin solution in CA10% rats; conversely, alcohol intake in IA20% rats was only partially affected by gustatory aversion or concurrent presentation of an alternative reinforcer. Finally, alcohol intake in IA20%, but not in CA10%, rats resulted in clear motor‐incoordinating effects. Conclusions: These data suggest that the “Wise” procedure is effective in inducing marked increases in alcohol intake in sP rats. These increases are associated with a reduced flexibility of alcohol drinking (suggesting the development of “behavioral” dependence) and produce signs of alcohol intoxication that are not detected when sP rats are exposed to the more conventional CA10% condition.     

Alcohol drinking in MCH receptor-1-deficient mice

Background: Recently, we demonstrated that exogenous melanin‐concentrating hormone (MCH) increases alcohol drinking in rats when administered into the brain. However, because the physiological relevance of this finding is unclear, we tested the hypothesis that endogenous MCH signaling enhances alcohol consumption. Methods: Alcohol intake was assessed in male and female wildtype (WT), heterozygous (HET), and homozygous MCH receptor‐1‐deficient (KO) mice. Mice were given 24‐hour access to a series of alcohol‐containing solutions. Following this, the mice were given limited (1‐hour) access to 10% alcohol. Finally, mice were allowed 24‐hour access to sucrose/quinine as a caloric control and a means to assess taste preference. A naïve cohort of male WT and KO mice was tested for alcohol clearance following intraperitoneal administration of 3 g/kg alcohol. Another naïve cohort of female mice was utilized to confirm that intracerebroventricular administration of MCH (5 μg) would augment alcohol drinking in mice. Results: Exogenous MCH enhanced 10% alcohol consumption in mice (saline=0.45±0.08 g/kg, 5 μg MCH=0.94±0.20 g/kg). Male KO mice consumed more 10% alcohol (11.50±1.31 g/kg) than WT (6.26±1.23 g/kg) and HET mice (6.49±1.23 g/kg) during ad libitum access. However, alcohol intake was similar among genotypes during 1 hour daily access. Male KO mice tended to consume less 17.75% sucrose+1.3 mM quinine than controls (WT=10.5±3.6, HET=7.5±1.7, KO=4.4±0.9 g/kg). Alcohol metabolism was similar between WT and KO mice. Conclusions: The finding that male KO consume more alcohol than WT and HET mice, are reminiscent of the counterintuitive reports that KO mice are hyperphagic and yet eat more when administered exogenous MCH. Changes in taste preference or alcohol metabolism do not appear to be important for the increased alcohol drinking in KO mice.     

Consistent, high-level ethanol consumption in pig-tailed macaques via a multiple-session, limited-intake, oral self-dosing procedure

Background:  Alcohol abuse is a major public health burden that can lead to many adverse health effects such as impaired hepatic, gastrointestinal, central nervous system and immune system function. Preclinical animal models of alcohol abuse allow for experimental control over variables often difficult to control in human clinical studies (e.g., ethanol exposure before or during the study, history of other drug use, access to medical care, nutritional status, etc). Nonhuman primate models in particular provide increased genetic, anatomic and physiologic similarity to humans, relative to rodent models. A small percentage of macaques will spontaneously consume large quantities of ethanol; however, most nonhuman primate models of "voluntary" ethanol intake produce relatively low daily ethanol intake in the majority of monkeys.
Methods:  To facilitate study of chronic exposure to high levels of ethanol intake, a macaque model has been developed that induces consistent, daily high-level ethanol consumption. This multiple-session procedure employed 4 drinking sessions per day, with sessions occurring once every 6 hours.
Results:  The group average alcohol consumption was 4.6 g/kg/d (SEM 0.4), roughly twice the group average consumption of previous reports. Ethanol drinking sessions produced group mean blood ethanol levels of 95 mg/dl after 60 minutes, and fine motor control was impaired up to 90 minutes after a drinking session.
Conclusion:  This model of multiple-session, limited access, oral ethanol self-dosing produced consistent, high-level ethanol consumption with each session qualifying as a "binge" drinking session using the definition of "binge" provided by the NIAAA (>80 mg/dl/session). This model of ethanol drinking in macaques will be of great utility in the study of immunological, physiological and behavioral effects of ethanol in nonhuman primates.     

Alcohol intake in prairie voles is influenced by the drinking level of a peer

Background: Peer interactions can have important effects on alcohol‐drinking levels, in some cases increasing use, and in other cases preventing it. In a previous study, we have established the prairie vole as a model animal for the effects of social relationships on alcohol intake and have observed a correlation of alcohol intake between individual voles housed together as pairs. Here, we investigated this correlated drinking behavior, hypothesizing that 1 animal alters its alcohol intake to match the drinking of its partner. Methods: Adult prairie voles were tested for baseline drinking levels with continuous access to 10% alcohol and water for 4 days. In Experiment 1, high alcohol drinkers (>9 g/kg/d) were paired with low alcohol drinkers (<5 g/kg/d) of the same sex on either side of a mesh divider for 4 days with continuous access to the same 2‐bottle choice test. In Experiment 2, high drinkers were paired with high drinkers and low drinkers paired with low drinkers. In both experiments, animals were again separated following pairing, and drinking was retested in isolation. In Experiment 3, alcohol‐naïve animals were tested for saccharin consumption (0.05%) first in isolation and then in high saccharin drinkers paired with low saccharin drinkers, and then in another isolation period. Results: In Experiment 1, high drinkers paired with low drinkers significantly decreased their alcohol intake and preference from baseline drinking in isolation, and drinking levels remained significantly lower during isolation following pairing. Interestingly, there was variability between pairs in whether the high drinker decreased or the low drinker increased intake. In Experiment 2, high drinkers paired with high drinkers did not significantly change their intake level or preference, nor did low drinkers paired with low drinkers, and no changes occurred during the subsequent isolation. In Experiment 3, there was no change in saccharin intake or preference when high drinkers were paired with high drinkers or low paired with low, or in the subsequent isolation. Conclusions: Alcohol drinking of prairie voles can be altered under social conditions, such that 1 animal changes its alcohol intake to more closely match the intake of the other animal, helping to explain previous findings of correlated alcohol drinking. The effect does not extend to saccharin, a naturally rewarding sweet substance. This behavior can be used to model the peer pressure that can often affect alcohol intake in humans.