Sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in a cardiac transplant patient with chronic renal failure.

Chronic renal failure triggered by calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression is a common complication after cardiac transplantation. Sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are 2 newer immunosuppressive agents with no documented nephrotoxic side effects. This case report describes a patient with ongoing chronic renal failure 10 months after cardiac transplantation on cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy. Conversion of the immunosuppressive regimen from cyclosporine to sirolimus and MMF resulted in freedom from acute rejection, excellent cardiac graft function and consistently improved renal function. This case illustrates the beneficial potential of sirolimus and MMF as CNI-free and safe long-term immunosuppression in a patient with chronic renal failure after heart transplantation.     

Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing immunosuppressive protocols

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have played an important role in improving graft survival. However, the balance between preventing immunologic allograft losses and the management of CNI-related nephrotoxicity is still an issue in renal transplantation. There are three major CNI-sparing strategies. CNI MINIMIZATION: The advent of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) allows cyclosporine (CsA) reduction to ameliorate renal function in patients with chronic renal allograft dysfunction, without increasing acute rejection rates. In combination with mTOR inhibitors, very low CNI levels may be sufficient to prevent acute rejection. However, in this association, CNI nephrotoxicity is magnified by pharmacokinetic interaction. CNI WITHDRAWAL: CNI withdrawal has been attempted in regimens containing MMF or sirolimus (SRL). Introduction of MMF in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) followed by CNI withdrawal resulted in stabilization or improvement of renal function and hypertension profile, although there is some risk of acute rejection. In regimes based on SRL, CNI withdrawal is a safety strategy, achieving a sustained improvement of renal function, histology, and graft survival. There is not consensus at all whether MMF should be added or not in patients converted from CNI to mTOR inhibitor. CNI AVOIDANCE: Polyclonal-based regimens with MMF and steroids have shown acceptable acute rejection rates, but high rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and opportunistic infections. Conversely, anti-IL-2R in combination with MMF and steroids resulted in 50% incidence of acute rejection, thus suggesting that CNI avoidance is not feasible in a regimen based on MMF. Alternatively, a protocol based on anti-IL-2R induction therapy combined with SRL, MMF, and prednisone has shown an efficient prevention of acute rejection, higher creatinine clearance and lower rate of CAN in comparison with a group treated with CNI. New strategies using costimulation blockade may help in the development of safe CNI-free regimens. In summary, in renal transplantation the new immunosuppressive medications have made feasible old aspirations such as minimization, withdrawal, or even avoidance of CNI.     

Calcineurin inhibitor minimization protocols in liver transplantation

Liver transplant recipients are at increasingly high risk for suffering from impaired renal function and probable need of renal replacement therapy. Extended criteria organs and transplantation of patients with higher model for end-stage liver disease scores further increase this problem. Acute and chronic nephrotoxicity are the trade-off in immunosuppression with potent calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). As a good renal function is associated with better graft and patient survival, CNI minimization protocols have been developed. Current strategies to overcome CNI toxicity include reduction or withdrawal of CNIs concurrently with switching over to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based regimens. This strategy caused an improvement in renal function in a significant number of liver transplantation patients according to several studies. However, total CNI avoidance seems to result in higher rejection rates. To prevent chronic renal dysfunction in patients prone to or with acute renal failure, CNI delay – with induction therapy for bridging – followed by low-dose CNI in combination with MMF are proven strategies without risking higher rejection rates. An individualized, tailor-made immunosuppressive regime, with a special focus on renal function is recommended. This review gave an overview on CNI minimization protocols in liver transplantation also focusing on recently analyzed studies.     

肺移植术后免疫治疗方案的探讨

目的总结肺移植术后急性排斥反应的诊断和治疗,探讨优化的免疫抑制方案对提高肺移植术后排斥反应的疗效。方法2002年11月至2006年6月,行肺移植手术16例,其中单肺移植7例、双肺移植9例,免疫抑制方案采用他克莫司（FK506）、霉酚酸酯（骁悉）和泼尼松为主的新三联和（或）辅以赛尼哌治疗。结果本组中除早期2例双肺移植术中因出现严重的肺水肿和早期移植肺失功能死亡外,其余14例手术成功,术后急性排斥反应发生率为21．4％（3／14）。应用赛尼哌辅助方案的8例患者术后6个月内无移植后急性排斥反应。在三联方案的6例中,术后有3例出现急性排斥反应。结论他克莫司、骁悉和泼尼松为主的新三联和（或）辅以赛尼哌治疗方案,在预防肺移植后患者早期急性排斥反应有较好疗效。     

Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplantation Still Needed but in Reduced Doses: A Review

Despite their contribution in the success of organ transplantation, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) may be responsible for frequent and severe side effects that can affect graft survival and life expectancy. In this article, we have reviewed registry studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that seek to avoid, withdraw, or minimize CNIs in renal transplant recipients. Attempts to completely avoid CNIs by administering mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and/or sirolimus (SRL) have resulted in increased risks of rejection and side effects, with small advantage to improve renal graft function. Early withdrawal of CNIs after transplantation using administration of MMF can improve graft function but may be associated with a greater risk of acute or chronic rejection and graft failure. RCTs in which CNIs were replaced a few months after transplantation by SRL reported improved graft function among SRL-treated patients, but such a treatment was complicated by iatrogenic toxicity. Late replacement of CNIs with SRL did not produce a particular advantage and again was complicated by more frequent side effects. On the basis of these trials, it seems that CNI elimination can trigger rejection or side effects. Recent RCTs showed that minimization of CNI doses in association with everolimus does not increase the risk of rejection, allows one to obtain good graft function, and is well tolerated. Such an approach seems therefore preferable to complete elimination of CNIs with substitution of the current immunosuppressive drugs.     

Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization in the Symphony Study: Observational Results 3 Years after Transplantation

The Symphony study showed that at 1 year posttransplant, a regimen based on daclizumab induction, 2 g mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), low-dose tacrolimus and steroids resulted in better renal function and lower acute rejection and graft loss rates compared with three other regimens: two with low-doses of cyclosporine or sirolimus instead of tacrolimus and one with no induction and standard cyclosporine dosage. This is an observational follow-up for 2 additional years with the same endpoints as the core study. Overall, 958 patients participated in the follow-up. During the study, many patients changed their immunosuppressive regimen (e.g. switched from sirolimus to tacrolimus), but the vast majority (95%) remained on MMF. During the follow-up, renal function remained stable (mean change: −0.6 ml/min), and rates of death, graft loss and acute rejection were low (all about 1% per year). The MMF and low-dose tacrolimus arm continued to have the highest GFR (68.6 ± 23.8 ml/min vs. 65.9 ± 26.2 ml/min in the standard-dose cyclosporine, 64.0 ± 23.1 ml/min in the low-dose cyclosporine and 65.3 ± 26.2 ml/min in the low-dose sirolimus arm), but the difference with the other arms was not significant (p = 0.17 in an overall test and 0.077, 0.039 and 0.11, respectively, in pair-wise tests). The MMF and low-dose tacrolimus arm also had the highest graft survival rate, but with reduced differences between groups over time, and the least acute rejection rate. In the Symphony study, the largest ever prospective study in de novo kidney transplantation, over 3 years, daclizumab induction, MMF, steroids and low-dose tacrolimus proved highly efficacious, without the negative effects on renal function commonly reported for standard CNI regimens.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen in live-donor renal transplant recipients

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is a major concern after renal transplantation. To investigate the safety and efficacy of a CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen, 132 live-donor renal transplant recipients were included in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab and steroids. The patients were randomized to a maintenance immunosuppression regimen that included steroids, sirolimus, and either low-dose tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Over a mean follow-up period of approximately 5 yr, patient and graft survival did not significantly differ between the two maintenance regimens. Patient survival was 93.8% and 98.5% in the tacrolimus/sirolimus and MMF/sirolimus groups, respectively, and graft survival was 83% and 88%, respectively. However, the MMF/sirolimus group had significantly better renal function, calculated by Cockcroft-Gault, from the second year post-transplant until the last follow-up. In addition, this group was less likely to require a change in their primary immunosuppression regimen than the tacrolimus/sirolimus group (20.8% versus 53.8%, P = 0.001). The safety profile was similar between groups. In summary, after long-term follow-up, a CNI-free maintenance regimen consisting of sirolimus, MMF, and steroids was both safe and efficacious among low to moderate immunologic risk renal transplant recipients.     

Mycophenolate Mofetil and Calcineurin-Inhibitor Reduction: Recent Progress

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) has greatly contributed to acute rejection rate reduction. Because of its immunosuppressive potency it was initially thought that MMF would help in reducing/avoiding CNI-related nephrotoxicity. Elective avoidance of CNI in induction and maintenance MMF-based immunosuppression has resulted in an increased risk for acute and chronic rejection. A recent meta-analysis suggests that CNI elimination in patients on MMF with progressive renal dysfunction is associated with a better outcome, although more data are needed to support any recommendation. So far, the more conservative approach involving CNI minimization with MMF has been associated with amelioration of renal function and low risk for rejection, providing an adequate risk/benefit balance. However, MMF with belatacept might pave the way for CNI-free induction and maintenance immunosuppression. Meanwhile, the assessment of immunological risk by new monitoring tools could be a prerequisite to further implement such CNI sparing strategies.     

Calcineurin-inhibitor minimization protocols in heart transplantation

Cardiac transplantation has become an established method for end-stage heart disease. A calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-based regimen is the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy after cardiac transplantation. CNIs have reduced acute rejection and infection and markedly increased survival of cardiac transplantation patients. However, the dose- and time-dependent nephrotoxic effects of CNIs can limit long-term survival, and chronic renal failure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in long-term cardiac transplant patients. Early experience on withdrawal of CNIs (and maintenance of patients on azathioprine and steroids) in patients, who developed chronic renal dysfunction, resulted in rejection episodes with, sometimes, fatal outcome. The introduction of newer immunosuppressive drugs, like thymoglobulin, anti CD-25 monoclonal antibodies, mycophenolate mofetil, everolimus or sirolimus into clinical practice, has given transplant physicians new tools to adapt immunosuppression to patients' needs. Changes of immunosuppressive protocols by using new drugs early and late after transplantation and simultaneous reduction or weaning of CNIs have become attractive options. The aim of this article is to review strategies to delay, reduce or prevent CNIs after cardiac transplantation as means to improve short- and long-term outcome mainly by protecting renal function.     

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) in pancreas transplantation: a single-center experience

AIM: Advances in immunosuppression and careful monitoring for rejection are largely responsible for improved results in pancreas transplantation. We conducted a retrospective study to establish the effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) instead of azatioprine (AZA) in pancreas transplantation and to assess adverse effects in the two different immunosuppressive regimes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Since 1991, 27 pancreas transplantations were performed in 25 patients at our Institute. For induction therapy, immunosuppressant protocol consisted of quadruple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine, steroids, antilymphocyte globulin and AZA in 13 patients or MMF in 12 patients respectively. RESULTS: Acute rejection occurred in 76% of patients in the AZA group compared with 53% in the MMF group. Steroid-resistant rejection was observed in 7% in the MMF group compared to 38% of patients on AZA (p < 0.01). Two kidney grafts were lost due to acute rejection in the AZA group, one pancreas was lost due to acute rejection and one to chronic rejection in the MMF group. There were no significant differences in CMV infection. Severe fungal infections were noted in 2 patients treated with MMF. Malignancy occurred in 1 patient (pancreas graft lymphoma) in MMF. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, patients treated with MMF required less frequent and less intensive treatment for acute rejection. However, its short- and long-term side effects should be further investigated.     

Sirolimus rescue therapy for refractory rejection in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute renal allograft rejection episodes refractory to antilymphocyte preparations almost inevitably progress to transplantation loss. To reverse ongoing rejection processes, we administered sirolimus (RAPA) after failure of conventional immunosuppressive regimens including full courses of antilymphocyte sera. METHODS: All 36 renal transplantation recipients reported herein displayed either Grade IIB or Grade III biopsy-proven (Banff 1993 criteria) ongoing rejection episodes despite prior treatment with pulse and/or oral recycling of steroids and at least one 14- to 21-day course of murine (OKT3) or equine (ATGAM) antilymphocyte treatment. We compared the actual 12-month outcomes of two demographically similar cohorts of patients treated for refractory rejection with RAPA (Group I; n=24) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Group II; n=12) added to a baseline regimen of cyclosporine (CsA)/prednisone (Pred). RESULTS: Rescue therapy reversed the renal dysfunction in 96% of patients in the RAPA group versus 67% in the MMF group (P=0.03) despite the fact that a greater fraction of patients in the RAPA (17 of 24) than the MMF group (6 of 12) had experienced two or more episodes of acute rejection before study entry and the fact that the recurrent bouts of acute rejection occurred within the first 6 months posttransplant in 94% of patients in the RAPA group compared with 50% (P=0.005) in the MMF group. Among the patients who were reversed successfully, the rates of rebound acute rejection were similar (4% vs. 8%). The mean serum creatinine values were slightly, although not significantly, lower among RAPA than MMF patients at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months: namely, 2.6 vs. 2.8, 2.8 vs. 3.2, 3.0 vs. 3.3, and 2.8 vs. 3.2 mg/dL, respectively. The 1-year patient and graft survival rates were similar: namely, 88% vs. 92% and 83% vs. 67% for the RAPA versus MMF groups. CONCLUSION: RAPA is a potent immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of refractory renal allograft rejection.     

Use of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as induction and maintenance in simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplantation

Abstract Clinical trials using quadruple immunosuppression that include the combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes in simultaneous pancreas‐kidney (SPK) transplantation. In an attempt to obtain a low rejection rate without antibody induction therapy, we undertook a prospective study of combined tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as primary immunosuppression for SPK transplantation. In this study, we analyzed 17 patients who received low‐dose intravenous tacrolimus as induction therapy. This was combined with oral tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids as the primary immunosuppression regimen. There was a significant reduction of empirically and biopsy‐proven rejection with an incidence of 23 % (4 patients). Leukopenia, gastroparesis, and gastrointestinal side‐effects were the cause of discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil, or low tacrolimus trough level in those patients who developed rejection. All rejection episodes were easy to treat, and none of them required antibody therapy. The combination of tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil without antibody induction therapy is effective in preventing early acute rejection. This combination is safe and effective as an alternative immunosuppressive regimen after SPK transplantation.     

A "steroid-free" tacrolimus and low-dose mycophenolate mofetil primary immunosuppression does not prevent early acute rejection after liver transplantation

To assess the efficacy and safety of a primary immunosuppressive regimen with tacrolimus (Tac) and low-dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) without steroids and to determine the exposure to mycophenolic acid (MPA) in the early postoperative period, we performed a single-center, randomized 1:1, open-label, controlled study planned to be 60 liver transplantation patients randomized into 2 groups: group A, tacrolimus + MMF (750 mg orally twice a day); and group B, tacrolimus + MMF (750 mg orally twice a day) + steroids. After an interim analysis by the ethical committee patient enrollment was stopped. Data from 30 patients (12 in group A and 18 in group B with a mean follow-up period of 31 +/- 7 months) showed a patient survival rate of 91.7% in group A and 100% in group B and a graft survival rate of 91.7% and 88.9%, respectively. Nine patients (75%) in group A suffered an acute rejection episode, whereas in group B only 3 patients (16.7%) showed acute rejection (P = .002). All rejection episodes occurred in both groups at 1 week after transplantation. The difference in histological grading was statistically significant (P = .021). The toxicity profiles were similar in both groups. A primary immunosuppressive regimen based on Tac and low-dose MMF without steroids is safe but unable to prevent acute rejection at 1 week after transplantation even if early acute rejection does not affect the outcome in terms of morbidity and graft or patient survival.     

Calcineurin inhibitor sparing in renal transplantation

Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are effective at preventing acute rejection, their long-term use is associated with nephrotoxicity that may compromise long-term renal allograft survival. Consequently, there is considerable interest in identifying immunosuppressive regimens that permit reduced exposure to CNIs while maintaining adequate immunosuppression. Introducing such strategies early after transplantation may mean that the development of CNI-associated nephrotoxicity could be minimized or prevented. Several CNI-sparing regimens have shown at least comparable efficacy with standard-dose CNI regimens. In particular, a regimen of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids, interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction, and low-dose tacrolimus from the time of transplantation provided superior renal function and a lower acute rejection rate than the same regimen but with low-dose cyclosporine or low-dose sirolimus, or standard-dose cyclosporine, MMF, and corticosteroids. The use of low-dose cyclosporine does not seem to eliminate nephrotoxicity in de novo renal transplant recipients. The early withdrawal of CNIs from MMF-based regimens generally improves renal function but has been associated with an increased risk of acute rejection, in particular when the levels of mycophenolic acid were not adjusted to maintain the same total level of immunosuppression. Research aiming to achieve the "best" balance of efficacy and toxicity of available immunosuppressive regimens continues.     

Use of mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplantation: a literature review

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug, exhibiting its effect through inhibition of proliferation of T and B lymphocytes. Standard primary immunosuppressive therapy after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is based on a calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI): cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Renal failure with arterial hypertension, due to CNI side-effects, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after OLT. Several studies have shown the efficacy of MMF to improve CNI-induced nephrotoxicity, blood pressure, and uric acid concentration in liver transplant patients with concomitant reduction or withdrawal of CNI. Predose plasma mycophenolic acid concentrations (MPA) are related to adverse events, drug dose, and clinical status. Blood level values outside the suggested MPA therapeutic range are associated with acute rejection episodes and side effects, which have been described in about half of the patients treated with MMF. Most authors have described gastrointestinal and hematological side-effects, whereas these appear usually dose related, responding quickly to reduction. MMF is potent and safe immunosuppressive agent, and replacement of CNI by MMF in liver transplant patients with renal dysfunction may improve not only kidney function but also other CNI-associated side-effects, such as hypertension and hyperuricemia, with a low risk of rejection.     

Tacrolimus to Belatacept Conversion Following Hand Transplantation: A Case Report

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has emerged as a viable limb replacement strategy for selected patients with upper limb amputation. However, allograft rejection has been seen in essentially all reported VCA recipients indicating a requirement for substantial immunosuppressive therapy. Calcineurin inhibitors have served as the centerpiece agent in all reported cases, and CNI‐associated complications associated with the broad therapeutic effects and side effects of calcineurin inhibitors have been similarly common. Recently, belatacept has been approved as a calcineurin inhibitor replacement in kidney transplantation, but to date, its use in VCA has not been reported. Herein, we report on the case of a hand transplant recipient who developed recurrent acute rejection with alloantibody formation and concomitant calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, all of which resolved upon conversion from a maintenance regimen of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids to belatacept and sirolimus. This case indicates that belatacept may be a reasonable maintenance immunosuppressive alternative for use in VCA, providing sufficient prophylaxis from rejection with a reduced side effect profile, the latter being particularly relevant for nonlife threatening conditions typically treated by VCA.     

Potential immunological advantage of intravenous mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus and steroids in primary deceased donor liver transplantation and live donor liver transplantation without antibody induction.

With the current immunosuppressive regimens, graft loss secondary to immunological reasons after successful liver transplantation is a rarity; acute rejections, however, do occur, with the majority of them being steroid-responsive. The aim of the present study is to examine the rate of acute rejection with tacrolimus, intravenous (IV) mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids in primary deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) and live donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients. During the year 2005, 130 patients (mean age: 54.9 +/- 10.8, males: 84, females: 46, 112 DDLT and 18 LDLT) received primary liver transplantation. They were followed up for the incidence of acute rejection in the first 12 months. Liver biopsies were performed as clinically indicated; protocol liver biopsies were never performed. A total of 127 liver biopsies were performed. Thirty-two had a rejection activity index (RAI) score of > or =3, of which 24 biopsies in 20 patients were not treated with a steroid bolus. Eight (6.1%) patients (mean RAI score: 5.1 +/- 1.4) received 750 to 1500 mg of methylprednisolone over 3 days. Out of these, 2 were noncompliant, 4 were off MMF, and 1 was on cyclosporine. All patients responded to steroid therapy. None of the patients required any antibody preparation. In conclusion, IV MMF with tacrolimus and steroids is useful and required antirejection therapy in 6.1% of liver transplant recipients.     

High rejection rate during calcineurin inhibitor-free and early steroid withdrawal immunosuppression in renal transplantation

Morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular disease are major problems after renal transplantation. The effects of three immunosuppressive protocols on cardiovascular end points were investigated in a single-center, randomized, parallel (1-1-1) group. Acute rejection was a secondary safety endpoint. Groups were as follows: group one, tacrolimus+sirolimus; group two, tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); group three, sirolimus+MMF+daclizumab. All groups received two days methylprednisolone only. The Ethical Committee demanded an interim analysis when 50% of the patients were included. In this analysis, 54 patients with a median follow-up of 9.2 months were studied. The Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed a difference in rejection free survival between group one (82%) and group three (34%, P=0.03) and between groups one and two (tacrolimus-based, 76%) and group three (calcineurin-free, 34%, P=0.04). Calcineurin-free immunosuppression with two days of steroids only showed an unacceptable high incidence of acute rejection and re-rejection, and the study had to be stopped.     

Conversion to Sirolimus in Kidney-Pancreas and Pancreas Transplantation

Reports on the use of sirolimus (SRL) in pancreas transplantation are still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of SRL conversion in pancreas transplant patients. Among 247 patients undergoing simultaneous kidney-pancreas or solitary pancreas transplantation, 33 (13%) were converted to SRL. The reasons for conversion were calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) nephrotoxicity (n = 24; 73%), severe neurotoxicity owing to CNI (n = 1; 3%), severe and/or recurrent acute rejection episodes (n = 7; 21%), gastrointestinal (GI) side effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 5; 15%), and hyperglycemia (n = 4; 12%).Before conversion, all patients were maintained on a CNI, MMF, and low-dose steroids. They were gradually converted to SRL associated with either CNI or MMF withdrawal. Sixty-three percent (n = 15) of patients who were converted owing to CNI nephrotoxicity, showed stable or improved renal function. At 12 months after conversion, serum creatinine levels were significantly decreased in this group (2.2 ± 0.5 vs 1.6 ± 0.3 mg/dL; P = .001) and C-peptide values increased (2.9 ± 1.1.1 vs 3.1 ± 1.3 nmol/L; P = .018). The only patient with leucoencephalopathy showed improved neurologic status after SRL conversion. All patients converted to SRL because of GI side effects of MMF showed improvements, and none of those converted because of hyperglycemia experienced improvement. There were no episodes of acute rejection after conversion.We concluded that conversion to SRL in pancreas transplantation should be considered an important alternative strategy, particularly for CNI nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, and in cases of severe diarrhea due to MMF.     

Successful reversal of acute vascular rejection and cyclosporine-associated nephrotoxicity in renal allograft with combined sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as immunotherapy

Cyclosporine (CsA) has substantially improved patient and graft survival rates in solid organ transplantation. In clinical studies, sirolimus has been shown to be as effective as CsA to maintain survival of renal and cardiac allografts without causing nephrotoxicity. Herein we describe a patient with biopsy-proven CsA-associated nephrotoxicity and refractory renal allograft rejection who was converted from steroids, CsA, and azathioprine to steroids, sirolimus (RAPA), and low-dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The follow-up period was 60 months. We observed substantial improvement, even normalization in renal function. Our patient did not give consent to repeat biopsy after conversion. We also observed a beneficial effect of CsA withdrawal on blood pressure control. The spectrum of adverse events induced by sirolimus seemed to be mild relative to the potency of the immunosuppressive effect. The excellent response to combined RAPA and MMF in this patient was probably due to "concerted actions" of these agents on both B- and T-cell functions. The combination enhanced therapeutic efficacy while minimizing the toxicity of individual drugs used in the regimen. These findings suggest that sirolimus, when used as a base therapy in combination with low-dose MMF in a renal allograft recipient, may be an alternative to CsA-based therapy, providing potent immunosuppression of a renal allograft. Sirolimus administration facilitated steroids dose reduction.