Comparison of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus/sirolimus combination in kidney transplantation monitored by surveillance biopsy

BACKGROUND: Chronic steroid therapy in kidney transplantation has myriad side effects and steroid avoidance has become feasible. This prospective study compared the safety and efficacy of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and TAC/sirolimus (SRL) combinations in kidney transplantation. METHODS: In all, 150 kidney recipients were analyzed: 75 each in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups. The primary endpoint was acute rejection. Surveillance biopsies were completed to analyze subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Acute rejection and SCAR were treated by methylprednisolone. Two-year patient and graft survival, renal function, and adverse effects were monitored. RESULTS: Acute rejection was seen in 12% of TAC/MMF and 8% of TAC/SRL patients. Two-year actuarial patient survival was 95% and 97%, and graft survival 90% and 90% in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups, respectively. Surveillance biopsy showed cumulative incidence of SCAR was 27 % in TAC/MMF and 16 % in TAC/SRL groups at 2 years (P = 0.04). Overall, 33% of recipients in TAC/MMF and 20% in TAC/SRL received methylprednisolone for acute rejection/SCAR. Moderate/severe CAN was 10% in TAC/SRL group and 22% in TAC/MMF group(P = 0.06). New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) was 4% each in both groups. All recipients remain free of maintenance steroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid avoidance in tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with MMF or SRL provides equivalent 2-year patient and graft survival with a low incidence of acute rejection and NODM. SCAR and CAN are lower in TAC/SRL compared to TAC/MMF group. The impact of decreased SCAR and CAN in TAC/SRL group on longer-term graft survival and function is to be evaluated.     

Randomized trial of 3 maintenance regimens (TAC/SRL vs. TAC/MMF vs. CSA/SRL) with low-dose corticosteroids in primary kidney transplantation: 18-year results

A randomized trial of 150 primary kidney transplant recipients, initiated in May 2000, compared tacrolimus (TAC)/sirolimus (SRL) vs. TAC/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) vs. cyclosporine microemulsion (CSA)/SRL (N = 50/group). All patients received daclizumab induction and maintenance corticosteroids. With current median follow-up of 18 years post-transplant, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred less often in TAC/MMF (26% (13/50)), vs. the TAC/SRL (36% (18/50)) and CSA/SRL (34% (17/50)) arms combined (p = .23), with statistical significance favoring TAC/MMF (p = .05) after controlling for the multivariable (Cox model) effects of recipient age, recipient race/ethnicity, and donor age. First BPAR rate was clearly more favorable for TAC/MMF after stratifying patients by having 0–1 (N = 72) vs. 2–3 (N = 78) unfavorable baseline characteristics (recipient age <50 years, African American or Hispanic recipient, and donor age ≥50 years) (p = .02). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), using the CKD-EPI formula, was consistently higher for TAC/MMF, particularly after controlling for the multivariable effect of donor age, throughout the first 96 months post-transplant (p ≤ .008). These differences were translated into an observed more favorable graft failure due to immunologic cause (CAI/TG) rate for TAC/MMF (p = .06), although no significant differences in overall death-uncensored graft loss were observed. Previously reported significantly higher study drug discontinuation and requirement for antilipid therapy rates in the SRL-assigned arms were maintained over time. Overall, these results at 18 years post-transplant more definitively show that TAC/MMF should be the gold standard for achieving optimal, long-term maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.     

Poor tolerance of sirolimus in a steroid avoidance regimen for renal transplantation

Vascular disease and chronic allograft nephropathy have prompted re-evaluation of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in renal transplantation. Sirolimus (SRL) can facilitate early CNI withdrawal. We report on the Early CNI and Steroid Elimination in Leeds (ECSEL) study, which was terminated early due to poor tolerability of SRL. Basiliximab/methylprednisolone induction was used, then 2 months of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment. A total of 51 patients were randomized to continue TAC/MMF or switch to SRL/MMF. In ECSEL1, patients were switched at 2 months (n=10). In ECSEL2, SRL was introduced at months 4-6 and TAC was tapered (n=13). Median overall follow up was 701 days. All 10 ECSEL1 and 10 of 13 (77%) ECSEL2 patients discontinued SRL due to adverse events, including leucopenia, rash, mucosal ulceration, arthralgia, and possible pneumonitis. Mean end-of-study creatinine was comparable in all groups. Sirolimus should be used with caution in complete CNI and steroid withdrawal, due to the resultant intolerable adverse event profile.     

Influence of sirolimus on proteinuria in de novo kidney transplantation with expanded criteria donors: comparison of two CNI-free protocols.

BACKGROUND: The contribution of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors to proteinuria is controversial. The aim was to analyse proteinuria in suboptimal kidney calcineurin inhibitor-(CNI) free de novo immunosuppression. METHODS: All patients from our centre with donors >60 years and CNI-free treatment were included (n = 108). Patients were divided into two groups: (i) SRL group: sirolimus (SRL) + prednisone + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + antiCD25; (ii) MMF group: prednisone + MMF w/ or w/o antiCD25 (n = 75). Follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: Donors were slightly younger in the SRL group (68 vs 71 years; P < 0.05), receptor age (67 vs 65 years) was not significantly different. Patient survival in the MMF group was 88 vs 94% in the SRL group, however, these differences did not reach statistical significance. One-year graft survival censored for death was 83% in the MMF group and 94% in the SRL group. Acute rejection rate was 45% in the MMF and 15% in the SRL group (P < 0.01). The incidence of CNI introduction was higher in the MMF-group (35 vs 5; P < 0.05). The intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant differences of proteinuria [SRL vs MMF at 12 months: 461 (163-6988) vs 270 (53-3029) mg/day], which did not exist in the on-therapy (OT) analysis [SRL vs MMF at 12 months: 357 (199-1428) vs 279 (53-3029) mg/day]. New onset nephrotic range proteinuria seemed to occur slightly more frequently in SRL patients (3/33 vs 1/75; P = 0.049), however, all four cases occurred in a context of recurrent disease, or previous drug-independent damage or non-adherence. All of these patients were converted to CNI. CONCLUSION: SRL-based compared with MMF-based treatment in kidney transplantation with advanced age donors is associated with an acceptable outcome, however, with increased proteinuria in the intention-to-treat analysis. A large subgroup of the patients in the MMF group experienced acute rejection and required conversion to CNI.     

Tacrolimus with Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) or Sirolimus vs. Cyclosporine with MMF in Cardiac Transplant Patients: 1-Year Report

The most advantageous combination of immunosuppressive agents for cardiac transplant recipients has not yet been established. Between November 2001 and June 2003, 343 de novo cardiac transplant recipients were randomized to receive steroids and either tacrolimus (TAC) + sirolimus (SRL), TAC + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclosporine (CYA) + MMF. Antilymphocyte induction therapy was allowed for up to 5 days. The primary endpoint of >/=3A rejection or hemodynamic compromise rejection requiring treatment showed no significant difference at 6 months (TAC/MMF 22.4%, TAC/SRL 24.3%, CYA/MMF 31.6%, p = 0.271) and 1 year (p = 0.056), but it was significantly lower in the TAC/MMF group when compared only to the CYA/MMF group at 1 year (23.4% vs. 36.8%; p = 0.029). Differences in the incidence of any treated rejection were significant (TAC/SRL = 35%, TAC/MMF = 42%, CYA/MMF = 59%; p < 0.001), as were median levels of serum creatinine (TAC/SRL = 1.5 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 1.3 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 1.5 mg/dL; p = 0.032) and triglycerides (TAC/SRL = 162 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 126 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 154 mg/dL; p = 0.028). The TAC/SRL group encountered fewer viral infections but more fungal infections and impaired wound healing. These secondary endpoints suggest that the TAC/MMF combination appears to offer more advantages than TAC/SRL or CYA/MMF in cardiac transplant patients, including fewer >/=3A rejections or hemodynamic compromise rejections and an improved side-effect profile.     

Immunosuppression with Belatacept‐Based,Corticosteroid‐Avoiding Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Current immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation typically include calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids, both of which have toxicities that can impair recipient and allograft health. This 1‐year, randomized, controlled, open‐label, exploratory study assessed two belatacept‐based regimens compared to a tacrolimus (TAC)‐based, steroid‐avoiding regimen. Recipients of living and deceased donor renal allografts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive belatacept‐mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), belatacept‐sirolimus (SRL), or TAC‐MMF. All patients received induction with 4 doses of Thymoglobulin (6 mg/kg maximum) and an associated short course of corticosteroids. Eighty‐nine patients were randomized and transplanted. Acute rejection occurred in 4, 1 and 1 patient in the belatacept‐MMF, belatacept‐SRL and TAC‐MMF groups, respectively, by Month 6; most acute rejection occurred in the first 3 months. More than two‐thirds of patients in the belatacept groups remained on CNI‐ and steroid‐free regimens at 12 months and the calculated glomerular filtration rate was 8–10 mL/min higher with either belatacept regimen than with TAC‐MMF. Overall safety was comparable between groups. In conclusion, primary immunosuppression with belatacept may enable the simultaneous avoidance of both CNIs and corticosteroids in recipients of living and deceased standard criteria donor kidneys, with acceptable rates of acute rejection and improved renal function relative to a TAC‐based regimen.     

Conversion to low-dose tacrolimus or rapamycin 3 months after kidney transplantation: a prospective, protocol biopsy-guided study

Long-term survival of kidney allografts is primarily limited by a progressive decline in function characterized by the presence of interstitial fibrosis (IF) and tubular atrophy (TA) on biopsy. Since chronic calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) drug toxicity has been implicated as a significant cause of IF/TA, a major effort in transplantation has been to decrease or eliminate CNI therapy. We now report the clinical and histological consequences of converting renal transplant recipients at 3 months to either very low levels of tacrolimus (TAC; 4-6 ng/mL) or sirolimus (SRL; 6-10 ng/mL) therapy. Fifty-eight enrollees in this prospective randomized trial received low-dose (2.9 ± 0.6 mg/kg) rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction followed by standard doses of TAC (10-15 ng/mL), mycophenolic acid, and low-dose steroids for 3 months. Protocol biopsies were performed at implantation and 3 and 12 months. Six patients had evidence of either borderline changes (n = 5) or grade 1A rejection (n = 1) on the 3-month protocol biopsy and were not randomized. Only one patient had clinically evident rejection that occurred after randomization to SRL. One patient in each group had borderline changes at 12 months. Renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) was equivalent in both groups at 12 months (TAC 74 ± 15 vs SRL 66 ± 18 mL/min, P = .22). Chronic allograft damage index scores at 1 year were similar in both groups (TAC 2.8 ± 2.4 vs SRL 2.0 ± 2.7, P = .71). The percentage of patients with IF/TA scores greater than 2 at 1 year was low in both groups (TAC 12% vs SRL 9%, P = .78). Therefore, in a low-risk population defined as having a normal 3-month protocol biopsy, TAC levels can be successfully decreased to very low concentrations. One-year graft function and histology were equally well maintained with either low-dose TAC or SRL immunosuppression.     

Pediatric Lung Transplant Outcomes Based on Immunosuppressive Regimen at Discharge: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Real-World Evidence From the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients

BackgroundThis retrospective analysis of the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was undertaken to obtain real-world evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in pediatric lung transplant recipients to support a supplemental New Drug Application.MethodsOverall, 725 pediatric recipients of a primary deceased-donor lung transplant between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2017, were followed for up to 3 years post-transplant based on an immunosuppressive regimen at hospital discharge: immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC)+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), TAC+azathioprine (AZA), cyclosporine (CsA)+MMF, or CsA+AZA. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of graft failure or death (all-cause) at 1 year post-transplant, calculated by Kaplan–Meier analysis.ResultsThe use of TAC+MMF increased over time. During 2010 to 2017, 91.7% of pediatric lung transplant recipients were receiving TAC+MMF at the time of discharge. The proportion of recipients continuing their discharge regimen at 1 year post-transplant was 83.7% with TAC+MMF and 40.4% to 59.7% with the other regimens. Cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint of graft failure or death at 1 year post-transplant was 7.7% with TAC+MMF, 13.9% with TAC+AZA, 8.9% with CsA+MMF, and 9.1% with CsA+AZA. There was no significant difference in the risk of graft failure or death at 1 year post-transplant between groups from 1999 to 2005 (the only era when adequate numbers on each regimen allowed statistical comparison). No increase in hospitalization for infection or malignancy was seen with TAC+MMF.ConclusionThe real-world evidence from the US database of transplant recipients supported the Food and Drug Administration's approval of tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric lung transplant recipients.     

Early conversion to a sirolimus-based, calcineurin-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in the SMART trial: observational results at 24 and 36months after transplantation

Early conversion to a calcineurin‐inhibitor (CNI)‐free maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus (SRL), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids was associated with an improved 1‐year renal function as compared with a cyclosporine (CsA)‐based regimen (SMART core‐study). This observational follow‐up describes 132 patients followed up within the SMART study framework for 36 months. At 36 months, renal function continued to be superior in SRL‐treated patients [ITT‐eGFR_@36m: 60.88 vs. 53.72 (CsA) ml/min/1.73 m², P = 0.031]. However, significantly more patients discontinued therapy in the SRL group 59.4% vs.42.3% (CsA). Patient [99% (SRL) vs.97% (CsA) and graft 96% (SRL) vs.94% (CsA)] survival at 36 months was excellent in both arms. There was no difference in late rejection episodes. Late infections and adverse events were similar in both arms except of a higher rate of hyperlipidemia in SRL and a higher incidence of malignancy in CsA‐treated patients. In a multivariate analysis, donor age >60 years, S‐creatinine at conversion >2 mg/dl, CMV naïve(‐) recipients and immunosuppression with CsA were predictive of an impaired renal function at 36 months. Early conversion to a CNI‐free SRL‐based immunosuppression is associated with a sustained improvement of renal function up to 36 months after transplantation. Patient selection will be key to derive long‐term benefit and avoid treatment failure using this mTOR‐inhibitor‐based immunosuppressive regimen.     

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus: a case-control analysis of the risk factors

Aim of the present study was to assess, in a pair-matched analysis design, risk factors for post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in renal transplant recipients (KTx). The incidence of PTDM was evaluated in 538 consecutive KTx in relation to their baseline immunosuppression. PTDM was defined according to the 2003 American Diabetes Association and World Health Organization experts committee definition. As risk factors for PTDM development were considered: age, family history of diabetes, body mass index (BMI), baseline immunosuppression, doses and blood levels of the immunosuppressive agents used. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of CSA, TAC and SRL + CNI. Thirty-two pair-matched controls were identified among the 538 KTx and included in the risk analysis. Significant risk factors for the development of PTDM were identified in the family history of diabetes (P < 0.02) and BMI (P < 0.05). Higher BMI and positive family history for diabetes mellitus were significant risk factors for the development of PTDM, regardless of the immunosuppressive agent used.     

Conversion to Sirolimus in Kidney-Pancreas and Pancreas Transplantation

Reports on the use of sirolimus (SRL) in pancreas transplantation are still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of SRL conversion in pancreas transplant patients. Among 247 patients undergoing simultaneous kidney-pancreas or solitary pancreas transplantation, 33 (13%) were converted to SRL. The reasons for conversion were calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) nephrotoxicity (n = 24; 73%), severe neurotoxicity owing to CNI (n = 1; 3%), severe and/or recurrent acute rejection episodes (n = 7; 21%), gastrointestinal (GI) side effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 5; 15%), and hyperglycemia (n = 4; 12%).Before conversion, all patients were maintained on a CNI, MMF, and low-dose steroids. They were gradually converted to SRL associated with either CNI or MMF withdrawal. Sixty-three percent (n = 15) of patients who were converted owing to CNI nephrotoxicity, showed stable or improved renal function. At 12 months after conversion, serum creatinine levels were significantly decreased in this group (2.2 ± 0.5 vs 1.6 ± 0.3 mg/dL; P = .001) and C-peptide values increased (2.9 ± 1.1.1 vs 3.1 ± 1.3 nmol/L; P = .018). The only patient with leucoencephalopathy showed improved neurologic status after SRL conversion. All patients converted to SRL because of GI side effects of MMF showed improvements, and none of those converted because of hyperglycemia experienced improvement. There were no episodes of acute rejection after conversion.We concluded that conversion to SRL in pancreas transplantation should be considered an important alternative strategy, particularly for CNI nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, and in cases of severe diarrhea due to MMF.     

Risk factors for wound healing complications in sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients

Impaired surgical site healing occurs in 20% to 50% of sirolimus (SRL)-treated renal transplant (RT) recipients, with most patients having received concomitant corticosteroids. We determined the incidence of surgical site complications among RT recipients receiving SRL with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), with most patients on a steroid-avoidance protocol. SRL/MMF patients with complications within 3 months of transplantation were compared with 1) SRL/MMF patients without them and 2) matched RT recipients receiving tacrolimus (FK)/MMF. Between January 2002 and March 2005, 44 of 300 (15%) RT recipients received SRL within 6 weeks of transplantation. Fourteen (31.8%) developed lymphocele, bladder leak, wound dehiscence, cellulitis, or an abscess. Obesity (BMI > or =30 kg/m2) was significantly associated with problems: the mean BMI of SRL cases with complications was 29.9 kg/m2 vs 25.4 kg/m2 for SRL patients without them (P = .047). Seventy-one percent of obese SRL patients experienced complications compared with 24.3% (P = .025) of non-obese SRL patients. Surgical treatment was required in 29% of patients. Rates of maintenance steroid use were similar in SRL complicated cases compared with SRL patients without them. The FK control group showed a lower rate of complications (14.3%; P = .163) despite similar BMI, rejection rates, and chronic steroid use as the SRL group. Obesity and graft rejection were independent predictors of complications. Thus, among a group of predominantly steroid-free recipients on SRL, the rates of wound complications were similar to those seen previously, but the highest risk for them was observed in obese recipients and in those with acute rejection episodes. Wound complications were associated with significant morbidity.     

Mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression with sirolimus in renal transplantation: a randomized, controlled Spare-the-Nephron trial

As part of the Spare-the-Nephron trial, we evaluated the combination mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen for the preservation of renal function in renal allograft recipients. This 2-year, open-label, multicenter trial randomized 299 patients of which 151 were maintained on MMF and a CNI, 148 on MMF plus SRL (n=120, tacrolimus; n=31, cyclosporine). Baseline characteristics including measured (iothalamate) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were similar between groups. After 1 year, the mean percentage change from baseline in the primary end point of measured GFR was significantly higher in the MMF/SRL group compared with the MMF/CNI group. After 2 years, the change was indistinguishable. Calculated creatinine clearance and GFR were significantly greater with MMF/SRL at 2 years within which biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred in 14 MMF/SRL-treated patients (3 graft losses) and in 17 receiving the MMF/CNI (6 graft losses). Significantly, no patients receiving MMF/SRL but five treated with MMF/CNI died. Thus, compared with MMF/CNI treatment, a 2-year regimen of MMF/SRL resulted in similar measures of renal function but with fewer deaths and a trend to less BPAR and graft loss.     

Early steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplant: five years of follow-up

This prospective, comparative trial investigated the impact on mean change in height standard deviation score (SDS), acute rejection rate, and renal function of early steroid withdrawal in 96 recipients with 5 years of follow-up. Recipients under basiliximab induction and steroid withdrawal (SW: TAC/MMF; n = 55) were compared with a matched steroid control group (SC: TAC/MMF/STEROID, n = 41). SW received steroids until Day 6, SC decreased to 10 mg/m(2) within 2 months post-transplant. Five years after SW, the longitudinal growth (SDS) gain was 1.4 ± 0.4 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3 for SC group (p < 0.02). Height benefits in prepubertal and pubertal status in both groups were demonstrated in the delta growth trends (mixed model; p < 0.01). Biopsy-proven acute rejection in SW was 11% and 17.5%, SC (p: ns). Mean eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m(2)) at 5 years post-transplant was SW 80.6 ± 27.8 vs. 82.6 ± 25.1 for SC (p: ns). The death-censored graft survival rate at 1 and 5 years was 99 and 90% for SW; 98 and 96% for SC (p = ns). PTLD incidence in SW 3.3 vs. 2.5% in SC (p: ns). Five years post-transplant, early steroid withdrawal showed positive impacts on growth, stable renal function without increased acute rejection risk, and PTLD incidence.     

Mycophenolate Mofetil and Sirolimus Combination in Renal Transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) are potent non-nephrotoxic xenobiotic immunosuppressants. Their complementary properties may provide the rationale for their combination in induction and maintenance regimens. MMF, a reversible inhibitor of inosin monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) acts as an antiproliferative drug; and SRL, an mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor, inhibits cell proliferation driven by growth factors. Early experiences with the use of the SRL, MMF and steroid combination yielded insufficient prophylaxis of acute rejection. However, the introduction of induction therapy with mono- or polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies to the SRL-MMF and steroid combination brings an efficient acute rejection prophylaxis, while improving renal function and/or reducing of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). However, adverse events related to the use of this drug combination (mainly haematological and surgery-related) result in a high rate of discontinuations in some trials, which may hamper the potential benefits of this calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free strategy. Also, currently under investigation is whether in long-term immunosuppression, in MMF-treated patients, CNIs can be replaced by SRL to avoid and/or halt progression of chronic nephropathy and to improve graft survival. However, some authors reported a high proportion of patients with oral ulcers and proteinuria after switching to SRL. In short, refining the use of MMF and SRL may provide a better risk/benefit ratio to pave the way towards non-nephrotoxic immunosuppression.     

Mycophenolate Mofetil/Sirolimus Compared to Other Common Immunosuppressive Regimens in Kidney Transplantation

We evaluated outcomes with the sirolimus (SRL) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combination regimen (SRL/MMF) in solitary kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2005 reported to the Scientific Registry of Renal Transplant Recipients. Three-and-a-half percent received SRL/MMF (n = 2040). Six-month acute rejection rates were higher with SRL/MMF (SRL/MMF: 16.0% vs. other regimens: 11.2%, p < 0.001). Overall graft survival was significantly lower on SRL/MMF. SRL/MMF was associated with twice the hazard for graft loss (AHR = 2.0, 95% C.I., 1.8, 2.2) relative to TAC/MMF, also consistent in both living donor transplants (AHR = 2.4, 95% C.I., 1.9, 2.9) and expanded criteria donor transplants (AHR = 2.1, 95% C.I., 1.7-2.5). Among deceased donor transplants, DGF rates were higher in the SRL/MMF cohort (47% vs. 27%, p < 0.001). However, adjusted graft survival was also significantly inferior with SRL/MMF in DGF-free patients (AHR = 1.9, 95% C.I., 1.6-2.3). In analyses restricted to patients who remained on the discharge regimen at 6 months posttransplant, conditional graft survival in deceased donor transplants was significantly lower with SRL/MMF compared to patients on TAC/MMF or CsA/MMF regimens at 5 years posttransplant (64%, 78%, 78%, respectively, p = 0.001) and across all patient subgroups. In conclusion, SRL/MMF is associated with inferior renal transplant outcomes compared with other commonly used regimens.     

Albuminuria after renal transplantation: maintenance with sirolimus/low-dose tacrolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil/high-dose tacrolimus

Maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus (SRL) in renal transplantation has been associated with proteinuria. We report long-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients maintained on steroid-free regimens, either SRL with low-dose tacrolimus (SRL/L-Tac) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with high-dose tacrolimus (MMF/H-Tac). We conducted a case-matched study of 50 patients receiving MMF/H-Tac, matched 1:2 with 100 patients maintained on SRL/L-Tac. All patients were induced with rabbit antithymocyte globulin followed by early steroid withdrawal. Comparisons were made of patient and graft survival, graft function, acute rejection, and albuminuria. There were no significant differences between the SRL/L-Tac and MMF/H-Tac groups for patient survival, graft survival, occurrence of acute rejection, or graft function. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥300 μg/mg (19% vs. 20%), but more patients in the SRL group were receiving renin-angiotensin system blocking agents (72% vs. 53%, p = 0.04). Only flushing the donor kidney with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (vs. UW solution) was predictive of albuminuria. Long-term outcomes are similar at our center for kidney transplant patients receiving either SRL/L-Tac or MMF/H-Tac. Although the occurrence of albuminuria was not different, significantly more SRL-treated patients were receiving antiproteinuric medications.     

Lipid profile changes during the first year after kidney transplantation: risk factors and influence of the immunosuppressive drug regimen

Aim

This study analyzed the incidence, time course, and risk factors associated with dyslipidemia during the first year after kidney transplantation among patients receiving various immunosuppressive regimens.

Methods

The analysis included 474 kidney transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine (CSA) combined with sirolimus (SRL; n = 137) or mycophenolate (MMF, n = 58) or everolimus (EVR, n = 47); or SRL combined with MMF (n = 32); or tacrolimus (TAC) combined with SRL (n = 86) or MMF (n = 114). All patients received prednisone. We evaluated the influence of demographic features, clinical outcomes, and statin use on lipid profiles during the first year after transplantation. total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (hdl-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (ldl-C), non-HDL-C, TC:HDL-C, LDL-C:HDL-C, TG:HDL-C.

Results

Lipid profiles were within the recommended ranges in 28% of patients pretransplantation and in 10% at 1 year; 27% of them received statins. At 1 year, LDL-C <100 mg/dL was observed in 31.8% of patients but more than 35% of these patients still showed other lipid fractions or ratios outside recommended target concentrations. Among all patients with LDL-C > 100 mg/dL, almost 70% to 80% had other lipid fractions or ratios within target ranges. A logistic regression analysis showed age, gender, time on dialysis, diabetes, type of calcineurin inhibitor (CSA vs TAC), adjunctive therapy (SRL/EVR vs MMF) and prednisone dose to be associated with dyslipidemia.

Conclusion

Dyslipidemia is frequent at 1 year after transplantation. The lack of agreement among changes observed in lipid fractions and ratios suggests that more studies are necessary to guide therapy besides targeting LDL-C concentrations as recommended by current guidelines.     

Immunosuppression for Dual Kidney Transplantation with Marginal Organs: The Old Is Better Yet

Immunosuppressive protocols in dual kidney transplantation (DKT) are based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). We wonder whether a CNI-free immunosuppression can improve outcome in older patients receiving a DKT with marginal donor organs. Thirty-six were treated with CsA, MMF and prednisone (CsA group) and 42 with rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone (SRL group). Incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection was 44% and 11% in the CsA group, and 40% and 8% in the SRL group. CMV infection incidence was low in both protocols. Three-year patient survival was 89% in the CsA and 76% in the SRL group. One- and 3-year graft survival after censoring for dead with a functioning allograft was 94.2% and 94% in CsA and 95% and 90% in SRL, respectively. Renal function was similar in both groups whereas proteinuria was higher in the SRL group. Uninephrectomy due to graft thrombosis or urinary-related complications was numerically higher in the SRL (21%) than in the CsA group (8%) (p = 0.13) and it was associated with renal failure and proteinuria. In DKT, a new induction immunosuppressive protocol based on rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone does not offer any advantage in comparison to the old CsA, MMF and prednisone.     

Comparative effects of sirolimus and cyclosporin on conduit arteries endothelial function in kidney recipients

This study attempted to establish whether a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐free immunosuppressant regimen based on sirolimus (SRL) is associated with a preservation of conduit arteries endothelial function in kidney recipients or not. Twenty‐nine kidney recipients were randomized to receive since transplantation SRL (n = 15) or cyclosporin A (CsA, n = 14) associated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids (6 months) in a parallel prospective study. Systolic, diastolic blood pressures, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and radial artery flow‐mediated dilatation (FMD) induced by postischaemic hyperaemia were assessed in a blind manner at one (M1) and 7 months (M7) after transplantation. Endothelium‐independent dilatation was assessed by glyceryl trinitrate spray. There was no difference between the groups for all vascular parameters at M1. At M7, systolic blood pressure was lower (SRL: 119 ± 3 vs. CsA: 138 ± 4 mmHg, P < 0.05) and FMD was higher in SRL compared with CsA (SRL: 13.1 ± 0.9 vs. CsA: 9.9 ± 0.9%, P < 0.05) without any difference for hyperaemia, endothelium‐independent dilatation and GFR (SRL: 66.7 ± 1.05 vs. CsA: 67.5 ± 1.22 ml/min). Our results demonstrate that a CNI‐free regimen based on SRL and MMF prevents conduit artery endothelial dysfunction compared with CsA and MMF in kidney recipients suggesting a beneficial arterial wall effect that may also contribute to the decrease in systolic blood pressure.