心房颤动的治疗进展

心房颤动是临床最常见的持续性心律失常,也是目前的研究热点。其治疗的方法包括药物、导管消融及外科手术等。对于其方式的选择也有争论。现就心房颤动的当前相关治疗进行综述。     

Clinical Relevance of Silent Atrial Fibrillation: Prevalence, Prognosis, Quality of Life, and Management

Although first described about 100yr ago, atrial fibrillation (AF) is now recognized as the most common of all arrhythmias. It has a substantial morbidity and presents a considerable health care burden. Improved diagnosis and an ageing population with an increased likelihood of underlying cardiac disease results in AF in more than 1% of population. AF is associated with an approximately two-fold increase in mortality, largely due to stroke which occurs at an annual rate of 5–7%. Another risk to survival is heart failure, which is aggravated by poor control of the ventricular rate during AF. Usually AF is associated with a variety of symptoms: palpitations, dyspnea, chest discomfort, fatigue, dizziness, and syncope. Paroxysmal AF is likely to be symptomatic and frequently presents with specific symptoms, while permanent AF is usually associated with less specific symptoms. However, in at least one third of patients, no obvious symptoms or noticeable degradation of quality of life are observed. This asymptomatic, or silent, AF is diagnosed incidentally during routine physical examinations, pre-operative assessments or population surveys. Recently, a very large incidence of generally short paroxysms of AF has been seen in patients with implantable pacemakers or defibrillators and these arrhythmias are often silent. Pharmacological suppression of arrhythmia may be associated with a conversion from a symptomatic to an asymptomatic form of AF. Holter monitoring and transtelephonic monitoring studies have demonstrated that asymptomatic episodes of AF exceed symptomatic paroxysms by twelve-fold or more.Although symptoms may not stem directly from AF, the risk of complications is probably the same for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. AF is found incidentally in about 25% of admissions for a stroke. Studies in patients with little or no awareness of their arrhythmia condition indicate that unrecognized and untreated AF may cause congestive heart failure. In patients with coronary bypass, AF may not only represent risk for immediate postoperative morbidity and increase hospital resource utilization, but being unrecognized, may produce a significant impact on long-term survival and quality of life. Although silent AF merits consideration for anticoagulation and rate control therapy according to standard criteria, whether antiarrhythmic therapy is relevant in this condition remains unclear.     

Azimilide for Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Trial Results and Implications

Azimilide dihydrochloride (or azimilide) is a class III antiarrhythmic drug currently under investigation that has been tested in atrial fibrillation in four randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials to assess efficacy and dose range. These investigational trials showed that doses of azimilide 100 and 125 mg once daily prolonged the time to symptomatic arrhythmia recurrence in patients with a history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or both. Doses of 75 mg or less were not useful in this indication. Safety of azimilide has been examined in several different types of studies. In a large randomized clinical trial of post-infarct patients, azimilide neither increased nor decreased mortality risk. In patients with supraventricular arrhythmias, the most common adverse effects reported by patients on azimilide were approximately equal in frequency with those on placebo: headache, asthenia, infection, diarrhea and dizziness. Infrequent cases of torsade de pointes and severe neutropenia were reported in patients taking azimilide. Azimilide is an investigational antiarrhythmic drug that has shown efficacy in patients with atrial fibrillation.     

Combined Antiplatelet Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation:

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most commonly encountered cardiac rhythm disorder, affects approximately 1% of the general population and is associated with serious complications, most notably ischemic stroke. AF-associated stroke occurs at an annual rate of 4.5%. Anticoagulation therapy with warfarin has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials to reduce the risk for AF-related stroke by two thirds, but warfarin therapy is markedly underused in clinical practice because of its narrow therapeutic window and its implications on quality of life. This article reviews the present knowledge and potential future research avenues for the role of antiplatelet therapy in AF as an alternative to anticoagulation with warfarin for prevention of AF-associated stroke. Antiplatelet therapy recently has been shown to be protective against thrombotic events related to blood stasis. There is ample evidence from experimental and clinical studies that a combination of different antiplatelet agents may increase antithrombotic efficacy compared to monotherapy. Accordingly, a series of randomized controlled trials (ACTIVE [Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events]) has been designed to vigorously examine the role of combined antithrombotic therapy for prevention of vascular events, including stroke in high-risk AF patients. The ACTIVE program began patient enrollment in spring 2003. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 14, pp. S60-S63, September 2003, Suppl.)     

左心耳闭塞术预防心房颤动患者脑卒中的研究进展

心房颤动导致的血栓脱落是造成脑卒中的主要病因之一。尽管已经有证据表明长期口服华法林治疗可以降低心房颤动患者脑卒中的风险,但是,由于华法林在使用中存在诸多不便,限制了其临床应用。由于超过90%的心源性血栓来自左心耳,因此,左心耳封堵有可能降低高危患者卒中的风险。目前可以通过外科手术及介入治疗进行左心耳闭塞手术,介入方法创伤小、成功率高,为存在抗凝禁忌证或者不愿接受口服华法林抗凝治疗的患者提供了新的治疗选择。     

Amiodarone in Atrial Fibrillation

ABSTRACT Twenty-seven patients with atrial fibrillation without any concomitant conduction abnormality have been treated with oral amiodarone in a daily maintenance dose of 200 mg. The drug has been used for three purposes: 1) to block atrioventricular conduction, thereby decreasing the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (9 patients), 2) as prophylaxis against paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (8 patients), 3) as prophylaxis against recurrence of atrial fibrillation after DC conversion to sinus rhythm (13 patients). All patients were considered refractory to other antiarrhythmic drugs in these respects. In the second group, 4 of the 8 patients reported complete cessation of attacks and the others a marked reduction of the attack rate. In the third group, 10 of the 13 patients have maintained sinus rhythm for a longer period on treatment with amiodarone than with other drugs, resulting more than a triple prolongation of the time in sinus rhythm. In 3 patients the drug has been discontinued because of side-effects. In conclusion, amiodarone affords protection from episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, as well as from recurrence of atrial fibrillation after DC conversion to sinus rhythm. If the drug is ineffective in either of these respects, it may still be useful as a means of moderating the ventricular response in atrial fibrillation.     

Immediate Reinitiation of Atrial Fibrillation Following Internal Atrial Defibrillation

Immediate Reinitiation of AF. Introduction: Although the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation has been reported to be similar to that after external and internal cardioversion, little is known about immediate reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (IRAF) following internal cardioversion. Methods and Results: Thirty-eight patients (24 men; mean age 63 ± 13 years) underwent internal atrial defibrillation. Catheter-based defibrillation electrodes were positioned in the anterolateral right atrium and the coronary sinus. All patients were cardioverted at a mean threshold of 4.6 ± 3.4 J. Five of 38 patients (13%) had 1 to 4 episodes of IRAF. No difference in clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were observed when patients with and without IRAF were compared. Atrial fibrillation was always reinitiated by an atrial premature beat. When the earliest atrial endocardial activation time on the defibrillation catheters was analyzed, these atrial premature heats did not seem to originate from the defibrillation catheters. Twenty-one patients had atrial premature heats without IRAF. When the coupling intervals of the first atrial premature heat in patients without and with IRAF after conversion were compared, a significant difference was found (661 ± 229 vs 418 ± 79 msec, P < 0.05). IRAF was successfully treated with repeated shock delivery after the administration of atropine in 1 patient and intravenous flecainide in 2. Only repeated shock delivery was sufficient to treat IRAF in another 2 patients. Late recurrences of atrial fibrillation occurred in 3 of 5 with IRAK and in 19 of 33 patients without IRAF (P = NS). Conclusion: IRAF after internal atrial defibrillation occurred in 13% of patients, was always initiated by an atrial premature heat having a short coupling interval not originating from the defibrillation catheters, and was prevented by repeated shock delivery with or without preceding administration of pharmacologic agents. IRAF did not predict early recurrences of the arrhythmia after discharge from the hospital, emphasizing the necessity to treat immediate reinitiation promptly to achieve a successful cardioversion.     

心房颤动与炎症和氧化应激

许多证据表明心房颤动中存在炎症和氧化应激,炎症和氧化应激可导致心房重构,包括电重构和结构重构,提示炎症和氧化应激可能在心房颤动的发生和维持中起着一定作用。抗炎和抗氧化治疗可减少心房颤动的发生和复发,这为干预心房颤动的发生和复发提供了新思路。     

Echocardiography in Lone Atrial Fibrillation

Twenty-seven consecutive patients with suspected lone atrial fibrillation were studied by M-mode echocardiography. Echocardiography disclosed structural or functional cardiac abnormalities in only two (12%) of 17 patients without any sign of underlying heart disease by history or physical examination, whereas an accompanying or underlying cardiac disorder was found in 6 (60 %) of 10 patients with ambiguous clinical findings. It is concluded that echocardiography is of minor value in patients with lone atrial fibrillation if symptoms and signs of other cardiac disorders are totally absent, but the presence of even minor or ambiguous clinical abnormalities seems to be a clear indication for echocardiography in these patients. It is, however, emphasized that echocardiography appears to guide the clinical management in less than 20% of patients with clinically suspected lone atrial fibrillation.     

心房颤动患者心房纤维化研究进展

心房颤动的发生和维持与心房重构有关。心房纤维化是心房颤动患者心房结构重构最突出的表现,目前被认为是发生心房颤动的结构基础,是心房颤动发生、维持的一个重要因素。现综述心房颤动患者心房纤维化及其发生机制。通过对心房颤动患者心房纤维化结构改变及肾素-血管紧张素系统、转化生长因子、基质金属蛋白酶等在心房纤维化的发生和心房颤动发生、维持中的作用等的全面阐述,,探讨了心房颤动患者心房纤维化的研究进展。防治心房颤动新的策略取决于对心房纤维化机制更好的理解。     

Clinical Significance of Early Recurrences of Atrial Tachycardia After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Early Recurrence After AF Ablation. Background: Atrial tachycardia (AT) commonly recurs within 3 months after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unclear whether early recurrence of atrial tachycardia (ERAT) predicts late recurrence of AF or AT. Methods: Of 352 consecutive patients who underwent circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with or without linear ablation(s) for AF, 56 patients (15.9%) with ERAT were identified by retrospective analysis. ERAT was defined as early relapse of AT within a 3‐month blanking period after ablation. Results: During 21.7 ± 12.5 months, the rate of late recurrence was higher in patients with ERAT (41.1%) compared with those without ERAT (11.8%, P < 0.001). In a multivariable model, positive inducibility of AF or AT immediately after ablation (65.2% vs 36.4%, P = 0.046; odd ratio, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–14.6) and the number of patients who underwent cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation (73.9% vs 42.4%, P = 0.042; odd ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–19.5) were significantly related to late recurrence in the ERAT group. The duration of ablation (174.3 ± 62.3 vs 114.7 ± 39.5 minutes, P = 0.046) and the procedure time (329.3 ± 83.4 vs 279.2 ± 79.7 minutes, P = 0.027) were significantly longer in patients with late recurrence than in those without late recurrence following ERAT. Conclusions: The late recurrence rate is higher in the patients with ERAT compared with those without ERAT following AF ablation, and is more often noted in the patients who underwent CTI ablation and had a prolonged procedure time. Furthermore, inducibility of AF or AT immediately after ablation independently predicts late recurrence in patients with ERAT. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1331‐1337, December 2010)     

心房颤动的基础研究和临床治疗新进展

近年来,心房颤动的基础研究和临床治疗有很多新的进展,现对此作一综述。     

D-二聚体在心房颤动病人血浆中含量变化及临床意义分析

目的观察心房颤动(房颤)病人血浆D-二聚体(D-dimer)水平的变化,并探讨其意义.方法应用免疫比浊法测定63例房颤病人(其中风心病22例,冠心病41例)和20例正常人血浆D-二聚体.结果房颤病人与正常人相比,房颤病人血浆D-dimer浓度为(252.2～456.6)mg/L,显著高于正常人(102.6～389.8)mg/L(P<0.01);风心病病人D-dimer浓度(262.0～446.5)mg/L与冠心病病人D-dimer浓度(252.2～456.6)mg/L比较,无统计学意义.结论房颤病人血浆D-dimer水平升高,与其高发血栓栓塞并发症有关,通过检测血中D-二聚体水平的改变,有助于了解房颤发生血栓栓塞的危险程度.     

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Antiarrhythmic Drugs for AF. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been used for the acute conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm, as well as for the long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm. In recent years, concerns regarding antiarrhythmic drug efficacy as well as safety have prompted a re-examination of the indications for antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. This review will focus on the safety and efficacy of antiarrhythmic therapy in the acute and chronic management of patients with atrial fibrillation.     

Effects of High-Frequency Atrial Pacing in Atypical Atrial Flutter and Atrial Fibrillation

Atypical atrial flutter has, hitherto, been relatively refractory totermination by rapid atrial pacing. High-frequency pacing (HFP) in theatrium, for termination of atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation (AF), andthe electrophysiologic effects related to it have not been examined. Weexamined the clinical efficacy, safety, and electrophysiologic mechanisms ofHFP using 50-Hz bursts at 10 mA applied at the high right atrium in patientswith atypical atrial flutter (group 1) or AF (group 2), using a prospectiverandomized study protocol. Four burst durations (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000ms) were applied at the high right atrium repetitively in random sequence in22 patients with spontaneous atrial flutter or AF. Local and distant rightand left atrial electrogram recordings were analyzed during and after HFP.HFP resulted in local and distant right and left atrial electrogramacceleration in 8 of 10 patients (80%) in group 1 but caused lessfrequent local atrial electrogram acceleration (6 of 12 patients) and nodistant atrial electrogram effects in group 2 (p < .05 versus group 1).The HFP protocol was effective in arrhythmia termination in 6 of 10patients in group 1 but in no patient in group 2 (p < .05 versus group1). Standard HFP protocol applied at the high right atrium can frequentlyalter atrial activation in both atria and can terminate atypical atrialflutter. Efficacy in AF is limited, probably due to limitedelectrophysiologic actions beyond the local pacing site.     

Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm after Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Lone Atrial Fibrillation and Patients with Hypertension

Background: The success rate and prognosis of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with organic heart disease is well known. In contrast, little data exist about cardioversion success and maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with lone AF and in patients with hypertension as the only underlying cardiovascular disease. Methods: In a prospective cardioversion registry 148 of 181 patients (81.8%) with lone AF (age 58 ± 13 years, duration of AF 7.6 ± 19 weeks) and 120 of 148 patients (81.1%) with hypertension (age 62 ± 10 years, duration of AF 6.6 ± 21 weeks) had successful cardioversion and were followed for 7.7 ± 1.9 months. Results: At follow-up, 120 patients (81.1%) with lone AF were in SR, and 18 of these patients had had repeated cardioversion during follow-up (AF total recurrence rate 31.1%). In stepwise regression analysis, the number of previous cardioversions was predictive of rhythm at follow-up (P = 0.0453). Rhythm at follow-up did not differ between patients who were or were not on antiarrhythmic drugs. At follow-up 96 patients (80%) with hypertension were in SR, and 9 of these had had repeated cardioversion during follow-up (AF total recurrence rate 27.5%). As in lone AF, the recurrence rate of AF did not differ between patients with or without antiarrhythmic drug treatment, and in multivariate regression analysis, the number of previous cardioversions was the only clinical predictor of rhythm at follow-up (P = 0.0284). Conclusions: Even in patients with such benign conditions as lone AF or hypertension as the only underlying disease, the prognosis of cardioversion in terms of maintenance of SR is poor. Future studies of rhythm control versus rate control need to include not only patients with organic heart disease but also patients with lone AF and patients with hypertension, since the long-term benefits of these two strategies remain unclear even in these subsets of patients.