Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay and serology in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia

Rapid diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia is required for treatment with effective antimicrobial agents without delay; however, this capacity has not yet been established in clinical practice. Recently, a novel nucleic acid amplification method termed loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has been used to rapidly diagnose various infectious diseases. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the efficacy of the LAMP assay to rapidly diagnose M. pneumoniae pneumonia in clinical practice. Three hundred sixty-eight children (median age, 3.8 years; range, 0.1–14.3 years) admitted to our hospital between April 2009 and March 2010 for community-acquired pneumonia were enrolled in this study. We obtained throat swabs on admission to detect M. pneumoniae DNA and paired serum samples on admission and at discharge to assay M. pneumoniae antibody titers. M. pneumoniae pneumonia was diagnosed by either a positive LAMP assay or a fourfold or greater increase in antibody titer. Overall, 46 children (12.5% of the patients with pneumonia) were diagnosed with M. pneumoniae pneumonia; of these, 27 (58.7%) were aged less than 6 years. Of the aforementioned 46 children, 38 (82.6%) and 37 (80.4%) were identified by LAMP and serology, respectively. When the results of serology were taken as the standard, the sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the LAMP assay were 78.4%, 97.3%, 76.3%, and 97.6%, respectively. We concluded the LAMP assay may be useful for rapid diagnosis of M. pneumoniae pneumonia.     

Validation of JRS atypical pneumonia score in patients with community-acquired Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia

IntroductionThe Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) atypical pneumonia score is a useful tool for the rapid presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia. We investigated the clinical features of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to Chlamydia psittaci and validated the JRS atypical pneumonia score in patients with C. psittaci CAP.MethodsThis study was conducted at 30 institutions and assessed a total of 72 sporadic cases with C. psittaci CAP, 412 cases with Mycoplasma pneumoniae CAP, and 576 cases with Streptococcus pneumoniae CAP.ResultsSixty-two of 72 patients with C. psittaci CAP had a history of avian exposure. Among the six parameters of the JRS score, matching rates of four parameters were significantly lower in the C. psittaci CAP than the M. pneumoniae CAP in the following parameters: age <60 years, no or minor comorbid illness, stubborn or paroxysmal cough, and absence of chest adventitious sounds. The sensitivity of the diagnosis of atypical pneumonia in patients with C. psittaci CAP was significantly lower than the M. pneumoniae CAP (65.3% and 87.4%, p < 0.0001). When the diagnostic sensitivity was analyzed for different ages, the diagnostic sensitivities for the C. psittaci CAP were 90.5% for non-elderly patients and 30.0% for elderly patients.ConclusionsThe JRS atypical pneumonia score is a useful tool for distinguishing between C. psittaci CAP and bacterial CAP in patients aged <60 years, but not in patients aged ≥60 years. A history of avian exposure in middle-aged patients with normal white blood cell count may be suggestive of C. psittaci pneumonia.     

A 3-year prospective study of a urinary antigen-detection test for <Emphasis Type="Italic">Streptococcus pneumoniae</Emphasis> in community-acquired pneumonia: utility and clinical impact on the reported etiology

To evaluate the efficacy of a rapid immunochromatographic membrane test (ICT) for the detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen for diagnosing S. pneumoniae pneumonia, ICT was performed with urine samples using the Binax NOW Streptococcus pneumoniae kit at the time of admission. The results were compared with those from conventional microbiological studies. Three hundred and forty-nine adult patients with CAP who were admitted to the hospital were studied prospectively between February 2001 and January 2004. The ICT test was positive in 115 (33.0%) of 349 patients enrolled into the study and in 63 (75.9%) of 83 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia confirmed by conventional methods. The test revealed a sensitivity of 75.9% and a specificity of 94.0% with conventional microbiological criteria used as the reference standard. The positive predictive value was 91.3%, and the negative predictive value was 82.6%. The clinical features of 53 patients in whom ICT was positive and no pathogen was identified showed no significant difference from those of 83 patients who had pneumococcal pneumonia identified by conventional methods. The diagnostic yield of pneumococcal pneumonia was increased up to 38.9% using ICT combined with conventional methods. The Binax NOW ICT to detect S. pneumoniae urinary antigen is therefore a rapid and useful method for diagnosing pneumococcal pneumonia. Induction of ICT will prove the predominance of S. pneumoniae in the etiology of CAP.     

Microfluidic platform versus conventional real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in respiratory specimens

Rapid, accurate diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae is compromised by low sensitivity of culture and serology. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has emerged as a sensitive method to detect M. pneumoniae DNA in clinical specimens. However, conventional real-time PCR is not cost-effective for routine or outpatient implementation. Here, we evaluate a novel microfluidic real-time PCR platform (Advanced Liquid Logic, Research Triangle Park, NC) that is rapid, portable, and fully automated. We enrolled patients with CAP and extracted DNA from nasopharyngeal wash (NPW) specimens using a biotinylated capture probe and streptavidin-coupled magnetic beads. Each extract was tested for M. pneumoniae-specific DNA by real-time PCR on both conventional and microfluidic platforms using Taqman probe and primers. Three of 59 (5.0%) NPWs were positive, and agreement between the methods was 98%. The microfluidic platform was equally sensitive but 3 times faster and offers an inexpensive and convenient diagnostic test for microbial DNA.     

Evaluation of the Virclia® automated chemiluminescent immunoassay system for diagnosing pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae

Background

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is considered an important etiologic agent of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) in outpatients. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a quick automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) for M. pneumoniae in a population‐based prospective study of CAP.

Methods

A total of 137 outpatients diagnosed with CAP were included in the study. Acute‐ and convalescent phase sera were analyzed for IgG and IgM to M. pneumoniae with both CLIA (VirClia^®) and ELISA immunoassays. Conventional serological criteria by quantitative ELISA were considered as reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of the assay were assessed with the construction of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the kappa index was used to evaluate the accuracy of the IgG and IgM determinations in the acute phase.

Results

Thirty‐eight patients were diagnosed with pneumonia by M. pneumoniae. ROC curves for IgG and IgM of convalescent and acute phase (C/A) quotients by the CLIA and ELISA assays were comparable. Specifically, for the CLIA, the best C/A quotient for IgG was 2.617 (sensitivity, 94.9%; specificity, 99.9%), and for IgM 1.400 (sensitivity, 65.8%; specificity, 100%). Regarding the acute phase, the best diagnostic accuracy for the CLIA was obtained with an IgG index of 1.120 (sensitivity, 89.5%; specificity, 73.7%). The CLIA was very simple to execute and required a minimum sample handling.

Conclusion

The accuracy of the Virclia^® assay for the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection in outpatients with CAP was equivalent to the quantitative ELISA. The CLIA was quicker to perform and displayed better analytic workability than conventional ELISA.

     

Diagnosis of Legionella pneumophila,Mycoplasma pneumoniae,or Chlamydia pneumoniae lower respiratory infection using the polymerase chain reaction on a single throat swab specimen

Diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae lower respiratory infections using DNA amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on throat swab specimens has been reported. In this study we determined the sensitivity of the detection of Legionella pneumophila in simulated throat swab specimens by PCR. Next, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of a single throat swab PCR with the current tests for diagnosis of Legionella spp., M. pneumoniae, and C. pneumoniae in patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Patients' work-up included: (a) throat swab speciment for Legionella spp., M. pneumoniae, and C. pneumoniae PCR; (b) throat swab specimen for C. pneumoniae, culture; (c) sputum specimen for L. pneumophila direct fluorescent antibody and culture; (d) urine specimen for L. pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen detection; and (e) serum specimen for L. pneumophila, M. pneumoniae, and C. pneumoniae acute and convalescent antibody titers. A total of 155 patients with lower respiratory infection were enrolled in this prospective study. Throat swab PCR was positive for Legionella spp. in five of the six patients with legionellosis, indicating the presence of this organism in the oropharynx of patients with Legionnaires disease. Mycoplasma pneumoniae PCR was positive in eight of the nine patients with mycoplasma infection. Chlamydia pneumoniae PCR was positive in the two patients with C. pneumoniae infection. None of the other 138 patients with negative PCR had other positive confirmatory tests for respiratory infection by these three organisms (100% specificity). PCR was able to detect 15 of the 17 infected (88.2%). Results of this investigation indicate that PCR on a single throat swab specimen is a rapid, sensitive, and specific test that may greatly simplify the diagnosis of lower respiratory infection caused by Legionella spp., Mycoplasma pneumoniae, or C. pneumoniae.     

A comparison of IgM anti-P1 immunoblotting and a polymerase chain reaction assay for the diagnosis of acute Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory infection in children

A rapid IgM immunoblotting serological test was compared to a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay of respiratory specimens for the diagnosis of acute Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Among 112 paired specimens, the frequency of a positive diagnosis by any method was 7.1%. Both IgM serology and PCR were positive for only two out of eight infected patients. PCR positive, IgM negative patients (4) were ill for an insufficient period to allow the IgM response to be demonstrable (⩽7 days). PCR negative, IgM positive patients (2) were likely to have had negative amplification assays because of the nature of the respiratory specimens. Nasopharyngeal washings uncommonly inhibited PCR amplification. Both rapid serological and genetic amplification assays have a role, together or alone, in the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection and paradigms for cost-effective utilization will be required.     

Predictive Value of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Swab PCR Assay for MRSA Pneumonia

Pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with poor outcomes and frequently merits empirical antibiotic consideration despite its relatively low incidence. Nasal colonization with MRSA is associated with clinical MRSA infection and can be reliably detected using the nasal swab PCR assay. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the nasal swab MRSA PCR in predicting MRSA pneumonia. A retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary care center from January 2009 to July 2011. All patients with confirmed pneumonia who had both a nasal swab MRSA PCR test and a bacterial culture within predefined time intervals were included in the study. These data were used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for clinically confirmed MRSA pneumonia. Four hundred thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of cases were classified as either health care-associated (HCAP) (54.7%) or community-acquired (CAP) (34%) pneumonia. MRSA nasal PCR was positive in 62 (14.3%) cases. MRSA pneumonia was confirmed by culture in 25 (5.7%) cases. The MRSA PCR assay demonstrated 88.0% sensitivity and 90.1% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 35.4% and a negative predictive value of 99.2%. In patients with pneumonia, the MRSA PCR nasal swab has a poor positive predictive value but an excellent negative predictive value for MRSA pneumonia in populations with low MRSA pneumonia incidence. In cases of culture-negative pneumonia where initial empirical antibiotics include an MRSA-active agent, a negative MRSA PCR swab can be reasonably used to guide antibiotic de-escalation.     

Evaluation of 10 serological assays for diagnosing Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection

In this study, the performance of 10 serological assays for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection was evaluated. A total of 145 sera from 120 patients were tested. They were obtained from patients who were serologically positive for M. pneumoniae infection as well as from patients who were infected with micro-organisms that may cause interstitial pneumonia. The following assays were utilized: SeroMP IgM and IgG, SeroMP recombinant IgM, IgA and IgG, Liaison M. pneumoniae IgM and IgG and M. pneumoniae IgM, IgA and IgG ELISA Medac. The SeroMP Recombinant and Liaison assays both showed low IgM specificity, and crossreactivity was mainly observed in groups of patients with acute cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus infections. For IgA, the Medac assay was less specific than the SeroMP Recombinant assay. Discrepancies between the four tests were observed in IgG analyses, and due to the lack of a gold standard, 22 results were removed prior to determining the sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the overall performance of IgG assays may be overstated; nevertheless, the SeroMP assay demonstrated a lack of sensitivity. The seroprevalence of IgG appears to be very low, raising concerns regarding whether the serological techniques can detect IgG levels over time. Serology remains a biological tool of choice for diagnosing M. pneumoniae infection, but improvement and standardization of the assays are needed, particularly for the determination of IgG.     

Evaluation of new immunochromatographic assay kit for adenovirus detection in throat swab: Comparison with culture and real-time PCR results

A new immunochromatographic (IC) assay kit, BD Veritor System Adeno was evaluated to comparing with commercial available kit, BD Adeno Examan, cell culture, and real-time PCR using throat swab samples. Specimens were collected from 146 pediatric patients between July 2011 and January 2012.Mean age of patients was 4 years (8 months–15 years old). Patients were diagnosed with pharyngitis (n = 67), tonsillitis (n = 45), pharyngoconjunctival fever (n = 26), upper respiratory tract infection (n = 6), conjunctivitis (n = 1), or bronchitis (n = 1). Thirty-one of the patients (21.2%) had more than one disease.Among all samples, 61 (41.8%) were positive for adenovirus with BD Veritor System Adeno; 68 (46.6%) with BD Adeno Examan; 63 (43.2%) with real-time PCR; and 65 (44.5%) with cell culture. Serotype 3 (n = 41; 63.1%) was predominant among the 65 adenovirus isolates, followed by serotype 2 (n = 12; 18.5%), 1 (n = 6; 9.2%), 5 (n = 4; 6.2%), and 4 (n = 2; 3.1%). Relative sensitivity and specificity of BD Veritor System Adeno, BD Adeno Examan, and real-time PCR were 93.8% and 98.7%, 96.9% and 93.8%, and 96.9% and 100%, respectively. Positive predictive and negative predictive values for these methods were 98.4% and 95.1%, 92.6% and 97.4%, and 100% and 97.6%, respectively.The sensitivity and specificity of real-time PCR was greater than that of IC assay kits. However, IC assay kits also showed high sensitivity and specificity appropriate for clinical use.     

Characteristics of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with other respiratory pathogens identified by rapid diagnostic test

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) significantly impact disease treatment strategy. In Japan, information on the use of RDTs for patients with COVID-19 is limited. Here, we aimed to investigate the RDT implementation rate, pathogen detection rate, and clinical characteristics of patients positive for other pathogens by using COVIREGI-JP, a national registry of hospitalized patients with COVID-19.A total of 42,309 COVID-19 patients were included. For immunochromatographic testing, influenza was the most common (n = 2881 [6.8%]), followed by Mycoplasma pneumoniae (n = 2129 [5%]) and group A streptococcus (GAS) (n = 372 [0.9%]). Urine antigen testing was performed for 5524 (13.1%) patients for S. pneumoniae and for 5326 patients (12.6%) for L. pneumophila.The completion rate of M. pneumonia loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) testing was low (n = 97 [0.2%]). FilmArray RP was performed in 372 (0.9%) patients; 1.2% (36/2881) of patients were positive for influenza, 0.9% (2/223) for the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), 9.6% (205/2129) for M. pneumoniae, and 7.3% (27/372) for GAS. The positivity rate for urine antigen testing was 3.3% (183/5524) for S. pneumoniae and 0.2% (13/5326) for L. pneumophila. The positivity rate for LAMP test was 5.2% (5/97) for M. pneumoniae. Five of 372 patients (1.3%) had positive FilmArray RP, with human enterovirus being the most frequently detected (1.3%, 5/372).The characteristics of patients with and without RDTs submission and positive and negative results differed for each pathogen. RDTs remain an important diagnostic tool in patients with COVID-19 in whom coinfection with other pathogens needs to be tested based on clinical evaluation.     

Correlation of MRSA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal swab in ventilator-associated pneumonia,lung abscess,and empyema

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a pathogen empirically covered in pulmonary infections. Limited studies evaluate the relationship between the MRSA PCR nasal swab assays and clinically diagnosed ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), lung abscess, and empyema. This retrospective, single-center study included 161 patients, which aimed to validate the clinical utility of MRSA PCR nasal swabs in VAP, lung abscess, and empyema through sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predicative value (NPV) analysis. VAP had a 100% sensitivity, 89% specificity, 67% PPV, and 100% NPV.  Lung abscess had a 0% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 0% PPV, 90% NPV. Empyema had a 80% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 42% PPV, and 97% NPV. The study results demonstrate that the MRSA PCR nasal swab assay has the potential to be a vital tool in de-escalating antimicrobial therapy in VAP, lung abscess, and empyema.     

Chlamydophila pneumoniae serology: cross-reaction with Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection

Atypical pathogens Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae play an important role in community-acquired pneumonia. However, it has been pointed out that positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, Hitazyme C. pneumoniae) IgM reactivity is frequent among M. pneumoniae pneumonia patients. To clarify the reactivity of ELISA IgM in M. pneumoniae pneumonia, findings were compared with immunoblotting, ELNAS Plate C. pneumoniae (ELNAS) and the micro-immunofluorescence (MIF) test. Ninety-eight serologically confirmed cases with M. pneumoniae pneumonia and 10 cases with C. pneumoniae pneumonia were enrolled in this study. C. pneumoniae IgM-positive cases measured by the ELISA were observed in 30 (30 %) patients with M. pneumoniae pneumonia. However, there were no positive cases by immunoblotting, ELNAS, or MIF test. These cases determined to be IgM positive only in the ELISA were all negative by another serological test, recombinant enzyme immunoassay (rEIA), and these positive results in the ELISA were considered to be false-positive reactions. In contrast, IgM-positive findings in patients with C. pneumoniae pneumonia did not show any positive reaction in M. pneumoniae antibody titer. ELISA showed a high frequency of false-positive findings in patients with M. pneumoniae pneumonia, which included false-positive cases with a high titer for IgM. To accurately diagnose C. pneumoniae infection in various studies, including respiratory infections, researchers should consider the IgM false-positive reaction with ELISA in patients with suspected atypical pneumonia.     

Enzyme immunoassay for the detection of pneumococcal C polysaccharide in sputum of patients with presumptive pneumococcal pneumonia

A need exists for more sensitive and specific laboratory methods for the rapid detection of antigens of Streptococcus pneumoniae in body fluids of patients with invasive pneumococcal disease. We evaluated a prototype enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of pneumococcal C polysaccharide (PnC) in the sputum of patients with presumptive pneumococcal pneumonia. Patients with radiographically confirmed pneumonia had sputum samples collected within a 24-h period of the radiograph. PnC was detected in the sputum samples by EIA. The presence of antigen in sputum was compared to the isolation of pneumococci from sputum by the hospital laboratory. From 35 patients with pneumonia, samples from 12 patients who were culture positive for S. pneumoniae, were all positive by EIA (sensitivity, 100%). Eighteen samples from 23 patients that were culture-negative, were negative by EIA (specificity, 78·2%). Of the five samples that were culture-negative, but EIA-positive, two had documented antibiotic therapy before sputum collection. Sputum samples from patients with pneunonia that grew S. pneumoniae had higher optical density values than samples from patients without pneumonia. These results suggest that the PnC EIA may distinguish between sputa from patients with presumptive pneumococcal pneumonia and those who are carriers of pneumococci.     

Antibiotic susceptibility in relation to genotype of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae responsible for community-acquired pneumonia in children

Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae are the main pathogens causing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We identified S. pneumoniae (n = 241), H. influenzae (n = 123), and M. pneumoniae (n = 54) as causative pathogens from clinical findings and blood tests from pediatric CAP patients (n = 903) between April 2008 and April 2009. Identification of genes mediating antimicrobial resistance by real-time PCR was performed for all isolates of these three pathogens, as was antibiotic susceptibility testing using an agar dilution method or broth microdilution method. The genotypic (g) resistance rate was 47.7 % for penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (gPRSP) possessing abnormal pbp1a, pbp2x, and pbp2b genes, 62.6 % for β-lactamase-nonproducing, ampicillin-resistant (gBLNAR) H. influenzae possessing the amino acid substitutions Ser385Thr and Asn526Lys, and 44.4 % for macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae (gMRMP) possessing a mutation of A2063G, A2064G, or C2617A. Serotype 6B (20.3 %) predominated in S. pneumoniae, followed by 19F (15.4 %), 14 (14.5 %), 23F (12.0 %), 19A (6.2 %), and 6C (5.4 %). Coverage for the isolates by heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) and PCV13, respectively, was calculated as 68.5 and 80.9 %. A small number of H. influenzae were identified as type b (6.5 %), type e (0.8 %), or type f (0.8 %); all others were nontypeable. Proper use of antibiotics based on information about resistance in CAP pathogens is required to control rapid increases in resistance. Epidemiological surveillance of pediatric patients also is needed to assess the effectiveness of PCV7 and Hib vaccines after their introduction in Japan.     

Epidemiology of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae by age distribution in Japan

IntroductionMycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae) is the major pathogen involved in community-acquired pneumonia in all age groups. Resistance to macrolides, the first-line treatment for M. pneumoniae infection, is a major global public health concern. However, studies evaluating macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae infection simultaneously in all ages are limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae infection in terms of age distribution.MethodsWe enrolled 292 patients in Tokyo, Japan, who visited Eiju General Hospital or Zama Children's Clinic in 2015–2016. Patients were tested using real-time PCR for M. pneumoniae DNA. PCR-positive patients (n = 151) were further selected and sequentially divided into preschool-aged children (≤5 years, n = 31), school-aged children (6–15 years, n = 101), adolescents (16–19 years, n = 5), and adults (≥20 years, n = 14). We then analyzed the M. pneumoniae infection clinical characteristics, prevalence of macrolide-resistant infection, and 23S rRNA domain V resistance-associated mutation status.ResultsWe found insignificant differences in the prevalence of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae infection among all groups, clinical characteristics, and resistance-associated mutation status in patients with macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae infection. We also found statistically higher prevalence of mutation-positive (n = 85) M. pneumoniae in patients previously treated with macrolide compared to the mutation-negative group (n = 66); 63.8% vs 11.1% (p < 0.001), respectively.ConclusionsWe found no significant differences in both clinical characteristics and prevalence of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae infection among all ages. Also, previous macrolide treatment contributes to drug-resistance.     

Management of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: Utility of measuring serum lactate dehydrogenase level

It has been suggested that cytokines are associated with refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia, and steroid administration is reported to be effective in this situation. In order to elucidate the characteristics of refractory M. pneumoniae pneumonia, we analyzed five pediatric patients with refractory M. pneumoniae pneumonia, which was defined as showing prolonged fever and deterioration of clinical and radiological findings despite administration of appropriate antibiotics, compared with 15 pediatric patients with M. pneumoniae pneumonia who responded to treatment promptly (control group). Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and interleukin (IL)-18 levels were significantly higher in the refractory group than in the control group at the initiation of corticosteroid use (LDH: 571 vs 292 IU/L, p = 0.0129; ALT: 25 vs 11 IU/L, p = 0.0143; AST: 41 vs 26 IU/L, p = 0.0404; IL-18: 579 vs 365 pg/mL, p = 0.0402). Significant correlation was found between serum values of IL-18 and LDH (r² = 0.504, p = 0.0433). The administration of corticosteroids to patients in the refractory group resulted in the rapid improvement of symptoms and decrease in serum LDH levels in all patients. A serum LDH level of ≥410 IU/L, which was calculated from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, seemed to be an appropriate criterion for the initiation of steroid therapy. In conclusion, serum IL-18 and LDH levels can be used as parameters to determine which patients are candidates for corticosteroid therapy. In addition, serum LDH levels seem to be a useful marker for the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in refractory M. pneumoniae pneumonia.     

Real-time PCR for Chlamydia pneumoniae utilizing the Roche Lightcycler and a 16S rRNA gene target

Chlamydia pneumoniae (CPN) causes pneumonia in humans, and has emerged as an important respiratory pathogen. There are also established links between CPN infection and coronary artery disease. Traditional culture methods for CPN detection can be time consuming and difficult. There are a variety of molecular-based amplification methods for CPN detection. These methods are more sensitive than culture, but have the disadvantage of being inconsistent and non-comparable across studies. In this paper, we describe the adaptation of the existing primer set CPN 90/CPN91 for use in a real-time PCR assay using the Roche Lightcycler and a Taqman probe. This assay had an analytical sensitivity of between 4 and 0.4 infection-forming units (IFUs)/PCR reaction. A total of 355 samples were tested for validation of the assay. Tested samples included two standardized panels of blinded samples from culture (N = 70), archived specimens consisting of a CPN dilution series, CPN-spiked porcine aortal tissue and endarterectomy specimens (N = 87). The third group consisted of prospectively collected PBMCs from clinical samples (N = 198). Results were compared to nested PCR, which targets the ompA gene of CPN; TETR PCR, which targets the 16S rRNA gene of CPN; or the known result for the sample. Overall, the assay had a sensitivity of 88.5% (69 of 78) and a specificity of 99.3% (275 of 277). This method should prove useful for accurate, high throughput detection of CPN.     

Re-evaluation of the etiology and clinical and radiological features of community-acquired lobar pneumonia in adults

Objective

The aims of this study were to elucidate the frequency and etiology of community-acquired lobar pneumonia (CALP) and the clinical and radiological differences between CALP and tuberculous lobar pneumonia (TLP).

Early identification of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia using clinical and radiographic findings

IntroductionThe Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) scoring system is a useful tool for identifying Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Most COVID-19 pneumonia in non-elderly patients (aged <60 years) are classified as atypical pneumonia using the JRS scoring system. We evaluated whether physicians could distinguish between COVID-19 pneumonia and M. pneumoniae pneumonia using chest computed tomography (CT) findings. In addition, we investigated chest CT findings if there is a difference between the variant and non-variant strain.MethodsThis study was conducted at five institutions and assessed a total of 823 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (335 had lineage B.1.1.7.) and 100 patients with M. pneumoniae pneumonia.ResultsIn COVID-19 pneumonia, at the first CT examination, peripheral, bilateral ground-glass opacity (GGO) with or without consolidation or crazy-paving pattern was observed frequently. GGO frequently had a round morphology (39.2%). No differences were observed in the radiological findings between the non-B.1.1.7 groups and B.1.1.7 groups. The frequency of pleural effusion, lymphadenopathy, bronchial wall thickening and nodules (tree-in-bud and centrilobular) was low. In contrast to COVID-19 pneumonia, bronchial wall thickening (84%) was observed most frequently, followed by nodules (81%) in M. pneumoniae pneumonia. These findings were significantly higher in M. pneumoniae pneumonia than COVID-19 pneumonia.ConclusionsOur results demonstrated that a combination of the JRS scoring system and chest CT findings is useful for the rapid presumptive diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia in patients aged <60 years. However, this clinical and radiographic diagnosis is not adapted to elderly people.