Defining the patient acceptable symptom state for the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score following hallux valgus surgery

BackgroundThis study aimed to define the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score (AOFAS) following hallux valgus surgery.Methods548 patients underwent hallux valgus surgery and had AOFAS assessed preoperatively, 6 months and 2 years postoperatively. Responses to an anchor question were used as external criterion in receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses to define PASS thresholds.ResultsIn total, 429 patients (78.3%) reported their current state as acceptable. Areas under the curve (AUC) for ROCs were 0.71?0.81 for all analyses. PASS threshold was 88.5 at 2 years (sensitivity 64%, specificity 85%). Sensitivity analyses revealed that the threshold was robust.ConclusionsPatients with an AOFAS of 88.5 consider their postoperative symptom state to be acceptable. This knowledge will enable clinicians to identify patients who have attained a satisfactory functional status after hallux valgus surgery.     

The impact of hallux valgus on function and quality of life in females

BackgroundThe effect of hallux valgus (HV) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and the relationship between radiographic severity of deformity and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) is poorly understood.The aim of this study was to compare the HRQOL of female patients with HV to the UK population. The secondary aim was to assess the correlation between PROMs, including HRQOL, with radiographic severity of deformity.MethodsWeight bearing radiographic data (hallux valgus (HVA) angle; intermetatarsal (IM) angle) were measured in consecutive female patients presenting with HV. Each patient prospectively completed the Euroqol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (EQ-5D), Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS-Pain) and Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Data were stratified into age ranges and compared with an EQ-5D United Kingdom general population reference dataset. Pearson R correlation values were calculated for the PROMs and radiographic deformity.ResultsBetween July 2015 and March 2020, 425 consecutive female patients presented with HV for consideration for surgery. EQ-5D-5L data were prospectively collected for 396 of these patients (93.2%). Females less than 65 years with HV had a statistically significantly worse quality of life compared with females of the same age group in the general population. Above the age of 65, there was no statistically significant difference in EQ-5D-5L Index score between the two groups. Younger females reported higher VAS-Pain scores compared to older patients with 91% of patients reporting some degree of pain symptoms. There was a moderate correlation with MOXFQ Index score and EQ-5D-5L Index (R = ?0.51, p < 0.001) and VAS-Pain scores (R = 0.54, p < 0.001). There was no correlation between radiographic HV deformity and HRQOL measures or MOXFQ scores although it was noted that there was a trend of increasing HVA/IMA with age.ConclusionFemale patients presenting with HV deformity have a significantly reduced quality of life compared with the UK general population. The radiographic severity of deformity did not correlate with HRQOL measures or foot and ankle specific PROMs. Foot and ankle specific clinical PROMsmoderately correlate with HRQOL and may be a better marker of the negative effect of symptomatic hallux valgus deformity on quality of life.Level of evidenceIII     

Reliability and Validity of the Subjective Component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating Scales

This study evaluates the criterion validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) clinical rating scales by correlating scores obtained with these rating scales to scores obtained with the Foot Function Index (FFI) in patients with foot and ankle conditions. To date, the AOFAS scoring scales have not been shown to provide valid information despite their popularity. The FFI, on the other hand, has previously been shown to provide valid information in regard to conditions affecting the foot and ankle. A moderately strong inverse criterion validity correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient = -0.68) was shown when preoperative patients were administered both the AOFAS and FFI questionnaires, and the resultant scores were compared. Test-retest reliability measurements showed no significant difference (P = .27) between preoperative AOFAS scale scores measured at least 2 weeks apart. Construct validity was shown (P = .006) when dependent preoperative and postoperative (at least 3 months) AOFAS scale scores were compared, indicative of the clinical rating scales' ability to discriminate and predict quality of life related to foot and ankle conditions. The moderate level of correlation, satisfactory degree of reliability, and responsiveness (ability to distinguish differences between preoperative and postoperative conditions in the same patient) observed in this study suggest that the subjective component of the AOFAS clinical rating scales provides quality-of-life information that conveys acceptable validity regarding conditions affecting the foot and ankle.     

Normative data of the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) for pathological conditions

Background

The purpose of this study was to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) in patients to obtain normative data for pathological conditions.

Methods

The VAS FA was consecutively obtained in a foot and ankle outpatient clinic. The score results were categorized into different pathological foot and ankle conditions.

Results

414 patients were evaluated. Overall scores and score categories of all pathology groups differed from non-pathological data (n = 121). Within the different groups, no score differences occurred. Score standards were defined for these groups with sufficient statistical power (>.8): isolated Hallux valgus, Hallux valgus and claw toes, forefoot other pathology, midfoot other pathology, hindfoot pathology and ankle deformity. No standards were defined for other pathology groups.

Conclusions

The obtained data is normative for different pathological conditions of the earlier validated VAS FA. The obtained data is normative for different pathological conditions of the earlier validated VAS FA. This data could serve as a basis for assessment patient scoring before, during and after treatment which has to then to be proved by ongoing research.     

The Dutch version of the Oxford Ankle and Foot Questionnaire for Children: Useful for evaluation of pediatric foot problems in groups

Background

The purpose of this study is to develop a Dutch version of the Oxford Ankle and Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-c) to allow evaluation of pediatric foot care.

Validation of the Turkish version of the Revised Foot Function Index for patients with foot and ankle disorders

BackgroundThe revised Foot Function Index (FFI-R) is a multidimensional instrument that was developed to assess a patient’s self-reported health-related foot function. The FFI-R is clinically useful and easy to apply, and it has comprehensive subscales assessing the pain, stiffness, psychosocial stress, disability, and activity limitations related to foot and ankle problems. The present study was conducted to validate the Turkish version of the FFI-R, and to demonstrate its use in a Turkish population with various foot and ankle problems.MethodsThe English version of the FFI-R was translated into Turkish, and then, it was administered to 124 patients (mean age of 39.9 years old) with foot and ankle problems and a mean symptom duration of 7.9 months. These patients completed two well-established foot and ankle-specific patient-reported outcome measures, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOX-FQ), and a general instrument, the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The test-retest reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and the internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. The construct validity of the FFI-R was assessed by correlating its subscales with the FAOS, MOX-FQ, and SF-36 subscales.ResultsThe test-retest reliability of the FFI-R ranged between 0.84 and 0.97. The internal consistency was 0.97 for the overall FFI-R, and it ranged between 0.85 and 0.97 for the subscales. Significant correlations were obtained between the FFI-R subscales and the FAOS, MOX-FQ, and SF-36 subscales.ConclusionsThe Turkish version of the FFI-R was found to be a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the foot and ankle-related functional disability and health status of Turkish patients with foot and ankle problems.     

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability

The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure is a valid, reliable, and widely used self-reported questionnaire for the foot. It has been adapted and validated for a Turkish-speaking population. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence for validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Foot and Ankle Measure (FAAM-T) in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). A total of 316 patients with CAI were enrolled. The internal consistency and test–retest reliability were evaluated. Validity was examined using correlations with the Short Form Health Survey version 2.0 (SF-36v2) questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha scores were 0.94 and 0.96 for the the FAAM-T ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and FAAM-T Sports subscales, respectively, indicating high internal consistency. For the second administration, Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.96 for both subscales of the FAAM-T. The test–retest reliability of the FAAM-T was very high for both subscales with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97 and 0.94, respectively (p < .001). The standard error of the mean and minimal detectable change were determined to be 2.5 and 6.7 for the FAAM-T ADL and 6.9 and 18.5 for the FAAM-T Sport. The FAAM-T ADL and Sport subscales were strongly correlated with the SF-36v2 PF (physical functioning; r?=?0.51, r?=?0.40, respectively; p?=?.001) and SF-36v2 PCS (physical component scale; r?=?0.64, r?=?0.55, respectively; p?=?.001). The weakest associations between the FAAM-T ADL and Sport and the SF-36v2 were noted for the mental health subscale (r?=?0.08 and r?=?0.03) and the SF-36v2 MCS (mental component scale; r?=?.05 and r?=?.006, respectively). This study provides evidence for validity, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability for the FAAM-T to evaluate patients with CAI.     

Chevron osteotomy versus scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: A meta-analysis

BackgroundThis study intended to investigate the optimal surgical strategy in hallux valgus (HV), and to provide a basis for clinical treatment of HV.MethodsStudies related to chevron osteotomy and scarf osteotomy for HV were enrolled from online databases. Hallux valgus angle (HVA) was the main outcome variable. Enrolled studies included posttreatment data for intermetatarsal angle (IMA), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and complications. A random-effects model was applied for significant heterogeneity. Otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. Heterogeneity was assessed with Q test and I² statistics. Publication bias was evaluated with Egger's test. Based on the influence of weighted mean difference values or odds ratios, a sensitivity analysis was performed.ResultsFour studies including 384 subjects were evaluated to determine the optimal surgical strategy for HV. There was no statistically significant difference between chevron and scarf groups for HVA, IMA, AOFAS score, and complication rates. Sensitivity analysis showed good stability. The likelihood of publication bias was small.ConclusionThe effects of chevron osteotomy and scarf osteotomy for HV are comparable. Chevron osteotomy is less technically demanding.     

Comparison between a general and a disease-specific health-related quality-of-life questionnaire in patients after pancreatic surgery

Background/Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the short-form (SF-) 36 as a general instrument and the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) as a disease-specific instrument in patients after pancreatic surgery.Methods The questionnaires were sent to patients receiving pancreatic surgery over a time period of three years. Patients were compared with a normal population completing the SF-36 or reported normal-population values for the GIQLI. Agreement between the instruments was analyzed using Bland Altman plots.Results A total of 98 patients were included, most of them undergoing a Whipple procedure (86%). The most frequent complaints were meteorism, obstipation, stool urgency, and stress incontinence in 9% of the patients. Whereas in almost every domain of the SF-36 the HRQL was impaired in comparison to the normal population, the GIQLI showed differences in only the domain emotions. Neither the SF-36 nor the GIQLI was different between patients with early and advanced cancer stages. The SF-36 had no agreement with the GIQLI.Conclusions The results of HRQL studies depend on the instruments which were used. Whereas a general instrument may detect factors such as comorbidity more accurately, disease-specific instruments have the advantage of better clinical interpretability.Presented at the 120th Congress of the German Society for Surgery, Munich, May 2003     

Does the choice of outcome scale influence prognostic factors for lumbar disc surgery?: A prospective,consecutive study of 121 patients

From January to June 1994, we operated conventionally on 121 consecutive herniated lumbar disc patients as part of a prospective study. We analysed general data, case histories, neurological findings on admission and all data from imaging investigations and therapy. In addition, all patients received a questionnaire based on the Low Back Outcome Score. Most of the patients (93%) were followed-up for 1 year postoperatively in the same manner. On the Prolo Scale, we obtained a good result in 70%; 76% had a good Low Back Outcome Score. Predictive factors are different for different outcome scales. The preoperative duration of pain, the preoperative duration of paresis and smoking seem to be general predictive factors.     

Structural validity of the foot and ankle outcome score for orthopaedic pathologies with Rasch Measurement Theory

BackgroundThe Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is one of the most frequently used patient-reported outcome measures for foot and ankle conditions. The aim is to test the structural validity of the Finnish version of the FAOS using Rasch Measurement Theory.MethodsFAOS scores were obtained from 218 consecutive patients who received operative treatment for foot and ankle conditions. The FAOS data were fitted into the Rasch model and person separation index (PSI) calculated.ResultsAll the five subscales provided good coverage and targeting. Three subscales presented unidimensional structure. Thirty-eight of the 42 items had ordered response category thresholds. Three of the 42 items had differential item functioning towards gender. All subscales showed sufficient fit to the Rasch model. PSI ranged from 0.73 to 0.94 for the subscales.ConclusionsThe Finnish version of the FAOS shows acceptable structural validity for assessing complaints in orthopaedic foot and ankle patients.     

A prospective evaluation of patients undergoing surgery for the palliation of an advanced malignancy

Background Decisions regarding the use of surgical procedures for the palliation of symptoms caused by advanced malignancies require the highest level of surgical judgment. Prospective analysis of palliative surgical care may facilitate a more effective and representative evaluation of these patients. Methods Patients requiring surgery planned solely for the palliation of an advanced malignancy were offered entry onto this study. Outcome measurements were made before surgery and monthly thereafter until the patient’s death. Accepted techniques of pain assessment, quality of life, and functional status were used. Results Between May 1997 and December 1999, 26 patients were enrolled. Although 46% (12 of 26) of patients demonstrated improvement in pain control or quality of life after palliative surgery, these benefits lasted a median of only 3.4 months. Palliative surgery was associated with significant postoperative complications in 35% (9 of 26) patients. Conclusions Although many patients had no apparent demonstrable benefit from surgery, surgeons were able to identify a group of patients who experienced significant benefits after a palliative procedure. The relationships between the patient and family members and the surgeon play an important role in decision-making throughout the palliative phase of cancer treatment. The opirions and assertions herein are the private ones of the authors and are not to be construed as official policy or reflecting the views of the Department of Defense.     

Quality of life and patient satisfaction after laparoscopic antireflux surgery using the QOLARS questionnaire

Background Currently, evaluation of patient satisfaction and quality-of-life data to estimate the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery is an important issue. This study aimed first to report the midterm results for the surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by laparoscopic fundoplication and to evaluate surgical outcome, including quality of life and patient satisfaction. The second aim was to determine whether preoperative quality-of-life measurement can predict which patients will be satisfied with antireflux surgery. Methods The current prospective study evaluated the outcome of the quality-of-life data for 41 patients (13 men and 28 women) who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication in the author’s department of surgery between 1 January 2002 and 31 May 2003. The mean age of the patients was 41 years. Quality of life was measured by using a new quality-of-life instrument (QOLARS) developed and validated by the author’s study group. The patients completed the QOLARS questionnaire before surgery, then 6 weeks, 1 year, and 3 years after surgery. Results Before surgery, all the patients had a poor quality of life. The general quality-of-life and heartburn scores improved significantly within 6 weeks after surgery and showed further improvement by the end of the first postoperative year, then remained stable 3 years after surgery. The patients who became completely free of reflux-related symptoms were divided into two groups according to their satisfaction with the operative result. The patients dissatisfied with surgery had significantly worse median preoparative scores in four domians (physical functioning, emotional functioning, sleep disturbance, constipation) than the patients satisfied with the procedure. Conclusions The findings show that QOLARS is a sensitive tool for assessing surgical outcome after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. The quality-of-life response closely follows the clinical outcome of surgical treatment, reflecting its side effects as well. This study suggests that a generic quality-of-life scale can preoperatively identify patients with GERD who are likely to be dissatisfied with antireflux surgery.     

Quality of life after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding using the Baros and Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of weight reduction surgery is not only to decrease excess weight, but also to improve obesity related comorbidities and quality of life (QoL). Until now, few studies have utilized objective methods to evaluate all of these issues. Hereafter, using the newly developed Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II (M-A QoLQ II) incorporated into the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS), we report our results for patients undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). METHODS: M-A QoLQ II questionnaires were sent to patients undergoing LAGB at a single institution. Nonresponders were contacted by a second mailing and telephone calls. The respondents' data were scored according to BAROS guidelines. RESULTS: Data from 67 patients with a mean follow-up of 27 months (22-35) were analyzed. Mean age was 43.8 years (range, 21 to 68) with a mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) of 49.8 kg/m2 (range, 38.4 to 67.7). Mean postoperative BMI was 37.1 kg/m2 (range, 23.0 to 53.4) for a mean excess weight loss (EWL) of 53.2% (range, -7.5% to 108.6%). According to the BAROS scoring system, 8 patients (12%) were classified as failures, 13 patients (19%) had fair, 24 (36%) had good, 13 (19%) had very good, and 9 (13%) had excellent results. There was considerable improvement in patient's comorbidities, and positive scores for self-esteem, and activity level. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the M-A QoLQ II is an efficient method of assessing the success of bariatric surgery. Widespread use of the questionnaire would assist in standardizing reporting of results following bariatric surgery. Our results suggest that LAGB may lead to excellent results with regards to resolution of comorbidities, improvement in QoL, and overall weight loss.     

Decreasing suicide risk among patients with prostate cancer: Implications for depression,erectile dysfunction,and suicidal ideation screening

Objective

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among males, accounting for 19% of cancers, and the third most common cancer-related cause of death. Suicide rates in the United States have increased among males over the last decade. Further, suicide rates are higher in oncology patients, including patients with prostate cancer, compared to the general population. The objective of this article is to review the current literature and address the relationship between prostate cancer, depression, erectile dysfunction, and suicidal ideation.