The safety and efficacy of short course (5-day) moxifloxacin vs. azithromycin in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

Chronic bronchitis is common among adults and infectious exacerbations contribute considerably to morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin to azithromycin for the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) of suspected bacterial origin. Between October 1998 and April 1999, 567 patients with AECB were enrolled at 37 centers across the United States and Canada of which 280 (49%) had acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (i.e. pretherapy pathogen). Patients were randomized to either oral moxifloxacin 400 mg administered once daily for 5 days or azithromycin for 5 days (500 mg qd x 1, then 250 mg qd x 4). For the purpose of study blinding, all patients received encapsulated tablets. The main outcome measure was clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (14-21 days post-therapy). Secondary measures included bacteriologic response and a time-course of bacteriological eradication (one center only). Three patient populations were analysed for efficacy: clinically-valid, microbiologically-valid (i.e. those with a pretherapy pathogen), and intent-to-treat (i.e. received at least one dose of study drug). For the efficacy-valid group, clinical response at the test-of-cure visit was 88% for patients in each treatment group. In 237 microbiologically-valid patients, corresponding clinical resolution rates were 88% for 5-day moxifloxacin vs. 86% for 5-day azithromycin. Bacteriological eradication rates at the end of therapy were 95% for 5-day moxifloxacin and 94% for the azithromycin group. Corresponding eradication rates at the test-of-cure visit were 89% and 86%, respectively. Of note, eradication rates at test-of-cure for Haem. philos influenzae and H. parainfluenzae for moxifloxacin were 97% and 88% compared to 83% and 62% respectively for azithromycin. Among 567 intent-to-treat patients (283 moxifloxacin and 284 azithromycin), drug-related events were reported for 22% and 17%, respectively. Diarrhea and nausea were the most common drug-related events reported in each treatment group. Moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily for 5 days was found to be clinically and bacteriologically equivalent to 5-day azithromycin for the treatment of AECB of proven bacterial etiology. Given its excellent in-vitro activity, especially against antibiotic-resistant respiratory pathogens, and its acceptable safety profile, moxifloxacin should be considered an effective alternative therapy for patients with AECB of suspected bacterial origin.     

Macrolide therapy of group A streptococcal pharyngitis: 10 days of macrolide therapy (clarithromycin) is more effective in streptococcal eradication than 5 days (azithromycin).

We compared recommended doses of 2 oral macrolide antibiotics (10 days of clarithromycin, 5 days of azithromycin) for eradicating group A streptococci from the throats of individuals aged > or = 12 years with symptomatic pharyngitis and a positive throat culture. Patients received either clarithromycin (250 mg b.i.d. for 10 days [n=260]) or azythromycin (500 mg on day 1, followed by 250 mg q.d. for 4 days [n=265]). Follow-up throat cultures were obtained both at 13--19 days and at 28--38 days. We evaluated 392 patients (median age, 26 years; clarithromycin, 194 patients; azyithromycin, 198 patients). Ten days of clarithromycin therapy was more effective than 5 days of azithromycin therapy in eradicating the organism (91% [176/194] vs. 82% [162/198]; P=.012). More than 97% of all streptococcal isolates were macrolide-sensitive. Whether these bacteriologic eradication rates were the result of the 2 macrolides compared or were due to differences in duration of therapy could not be determined, but the statistically significant difference in eradication of group A streptococci does raise additional questions about shortened courses of macrolide therapy for this common infection.     

Short-term and long-term outcomes of moxifloxacin compared to standard antibiotic treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of oral moxifloxacin with standard antibiotic therapy in acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). DESIGN: Multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind study of two parallel treatment arms. PATIENTS: Outpatients >or= 45 years old with stable chronic bronchitis, smoking history of >or= 20 pack-years, two or more AECBs in the previous year, and FEV(1) < 85% of predicted value. Patients were enrolled when in a stable condition, and patients with exacerbations within 12 months of enrollment were randomized. INTERVENTIONS: Randomization (stratified on steroid use) between moxifloxacin (400 mg qd for 5 days) and standard therapy (amoxicillin [500 mg tid for 7 days], clarithromycin [500 mg bid for 7 days], or cefuroxime-axetil [250 mg bid for 7 days]). MEASUREMENTS: Assessment at enrollment, randomization (Anthonisen type 1 exacerbation), 7 to 10 days after treatment, and monthly until next AECB or up to 9 months. The primary efficacy variable was clinical success (sufficient improvement, no alternative antimicrobial therapy required) 7 to 10 days after therapy. Secondary predefined end points were clinical cure (return to pre-exacerbation status), further antimicrobial use, time to next AECB, and bacteriologic success. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-four patients received moxifloxacin, and 376 patients received standard therapy. At 7 to 10 days after therapy, clinical success rates were similar in intention-to-treat (ITT) patients (95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.7 to 9.5) and per-protocol (PP) patients (95% CI, - 3.0 to 8.5). Moxifloxacin showed superior clinical cure rates over standard therapy in both ITT patients (95% CI, 1.4 to 14.9) and PP patients (95% CI, 0.3 to 15.6), and higher bacteriologic success in microbiologically valid patients (95% CI, 0.4 to 22.1). Fewer ITT patients required antimicrobials after treatment with moxifloxacin than standard therapy (p < 0.01). Time to next exacerbation was longer with moxifloxacin; median and mean times to new AECBs in ITT patients who did not require any further antibiotics were 131.0 days and 132.8 days in moxifloxacin, and 103.5 days and 118.0 days in standard therapy, respectively (p = 0.03). The occurrence of failure, new exacerbation, or any further antibiotic was less frequent in moxifloxacin-treated patients for up to 5 months of follow-up (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin was equivalent to standard therapy for clinical success and showed superiority over standard therapy in clinical cure, bacteriologic eradication, and long-term outcomes.     

Moxifloxacin versus levofloxacin against acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: the Latin American Cohort

We compared the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin for the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) using a prospective, randomized, double blind, parallel-group clinical trial design. A total of 563 patients with AECB were enrolled (437 efficacy-valid) at 34 centers in Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. Patients were randomized to oral therapy with either moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily for 5 days or levofloxacin 500 mg once daily for 7 days. Clinical success was achieved in 201 out of 221 (91.0%) patients in the moxifloxacin group, and in 203 out of 216 (94.0%) in the levofloxacin group, indicating that moxifloxacin is equivalently effective to levofloxacin. Bacteriologic eradication or presumed eradication was also similar in the two treatment groups: 92.8% in the moxifloxacin group and 93.8% in the levofloxacin group. Nausea was the most common drug-related adverse event in each treatment group. The rate of discontinuation because of adverse events was very low (2%). In conclusion, a 5-day course of moxifloxacin is clinically and bacteriologically equivalent to a 7-day course of levofloxacin in the treatment of patients with AECB. The short treatment duration with moxifloxacin may have compliance advantages over other currently used therapies in the 'real-life' clinical setting.     

莫西沙星短程疗法对65岁以上AECOPD的近、远期疗效及安全性评价

目的评价莫西沙星短程疗法对65岁以上AECOPD的疗效和安全性。方法60例AECOPD（年龄≥65岁）随机分为两组，试验组（30例）给予莫西沙星0．4静滴，1次／d，疗程5d，对照组（30例）给予头孢哌酮舒巴坦3．0静滴，2次／d，和阿齐霉素0．5静滴，1次／d，疗程10天。结果治疗结束时试验组和对照组的临床有效率分别为93．33％和70．00％（P〈0．05），细菌学清除率分别为90．91％和75．00％（P〉0．05）；试验组和对照组不良反应发生率分别为10．00％和6．67％（P〉0．05）。结论莫西沙星短程疗法治疗AECOPD不仅起效快，近期疗效好，而且可以延长至下次急性发作时间的间期，减少1年内急性发作次数和使用其他抗生素的频率，可以作为AECOPD的一线治疗方案，在老年病人可安全使用。     

Antibiotic therapy for exacerbation

Bacterial infections are involved in approximately 50% of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Pneumococci, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis are the main pathogens. Studies using quantitative cultures and molecular typing suggest a causal relationship between bacterial infection and exacerbation. Furthermore, an association between infection and bronchial inflammation has been demonstrated. In contrast to steroid therapy and non-invasive ventilation, the benefits of antibiotic treatment are not well established. Current guidelines recommend antimicrobial therapy for AECB in type I exacerbations, for patients needing ventilatory support and for patients with cardiac comorbidity. Bacterial eradication is able to prolong the infection free interval.     

Treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: antibiotic therapy

Acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) is a condition associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Bacterial infections are the most frequent cause of exacerbations. The most common bacterial etiologies include Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumonia. The diagnosis of AECB is often based on the clinical presentation, but microbiological assessment, including Gram stain and sputum culture should be done. Antibiotic therapy should be used in patients with the following characteristics: underlying lung disease, frequent exacerbations, and comorbid conditions. Penicillins, erythromycin, beta-lactamase inhibitors, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole have been the preferred antibiotics. However, because of the increasing prevalence of resistance among respiratory pathogens, mainly the production of beta-lactamase by H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, and the emergence of multidrug-resistant S. pneumonia, new generation macrolides and fluoroquinolones should be the first line of treatment in selected patients. These drugs have increased efficacy and safety.     

Omeprazole plus azithromycin and either amoxicillin or tinidazole for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

GOALS: To establish whether omeprazole plus azithromycin in association with either amoxicillin or tinidazole is effective in curing Helicobacter pylori infection in dyspeptic patients. BACKGROUND: Many antibiotics in combination with antisecretory drugs have been used in an attempt to find the optimal regimen for eradication of H. pylori. Azithromycin is a macrolide that achieves high concentrations in gastric tissue after a single 500-mg oral dose. STUDY: A total of 160 consecutive symptomatic patients with H. pylori received omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 1 week, azithromycin 500 mg/d for 3 days, and were randomly assigned to either amoxicillin 1 g twice daily (OAzAm group, n = 80) for 1 week or tinidazole 500 mg twice daily for 3 days (OAzT group, n = 80). H. pylori status was assessed by rapid urease test and histology at entry and by histology and (13)C-urea breath test after the end of the therapy. RESULTS: H. pylori was eradicated in 62.5% of patients in the OAzAm group (intention to treat [ITT] 62.5%) and in 71.2% of patients in the OAzT group (ITT 71.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the compliance was excellent and the side effects negligible, the regimens used were partially effective for the eradication of H. pylori.     

Nationwide survey in Italy of treatment of Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis in children: influence of macrolide resistance on clinical and microbiological outcomes. Artemis-Italy Study Group.

Throat swab specimens were obtained from 3,227 children with symptoms of acute pharyngotonsillitis. After 14 to 21 days, a second throat swab specimen was obtained at a follow-up visit. Over 42% of the 934 strains of Streptococcus pyogenes isolated in the primary study were resistant to erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin. Eradication rates among the 668 patients who entered the follow-up study were as follows: 84.1%, penicillin recipients; 82.7%, cephalosporin recipients; and 71.7%, macrolide recipients. Among patients treated with macrolides, the eradication rate was approximately 80% when the infecting organisms were erythromycin-susceptible and approximately 60% when they were erythromycin-resistant. These results indicate substantial in vitro macrolide resistance among Italian isolates of S. pyogenes. However, at least for a minor self-limiting condition such as acute S. pyogenes pharyngitis, our findings point to a limited overall correlation between in vitro susceptibility (to penicillins, cephalosporins, or macrolides) and eradication in patients treated with these drugs and an even weaker correlation between in vitro resistance (to macrolides) and noneradication in patients receiving macrolide therapy.     

Short-course moxifloxacin therapy for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The Bronchitis Study Group

Chronic bronchitis is common among adults and infectious exacerbations contribute considerably to morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin to clarithromycin for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB) using a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial. Between November 21, 1996 and April 7, 1998, 936 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) were enrolled at 56 centers across the United States of which 491 (52%) had ABECB (i.e. pretherapy pathogen). Patients were randomized to either oral moxifloxacin 400 mg administer once daily, for either 5 or 10 days, or clarithromycin 500 mg bid for 10 days. For the purpose of study blinding, the patients taking moxifloxacin received placebo to maintain uniform dosing. The main outcome measures were bacteriological response at the end of therapy (post-therapy days 0-6) and follow-up (7-17 days post-therapy) visits, as well as overall clinical response, clinical response at the end of therapy and clinical response at follow-up. Two patient populations were analyzed: efficacy-valid (i.e., those with a pretherapy pathogen) and intent-to-treat (i.e., all subjects that took drug). In 420 efficacy valid patients with a pretherapy organism, overall clinical resolution was 89% for 5 days moxifloxacin vs. 91% for 10 day moxifloxacin vs. 91% for 10 day clarithromycin. Bacteriological eradication rates at the end of therapy were 94% and 95% for 5-day moxifloxacin and 10-day moxifloxacin, respectively, and 91% for the clarithromycin group. Eradication rates at follow-up were 89% and 91% for 5-day moxifloxacin and 10-day moxifloxacin respectively, and 85% for the clarithromycin group. Among 926 intent-to-treat patients (312 5-day moxifloxacin, 302 10-day moxifloxacin and 312 clarithromycin), drug-related events were reported for 26%, 30% and 35%, respectively. Moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily, as a 5 or 10 day regimen, was found to be clinically and bacteriologically equivalent to 10 day clarithromycin for the treatment of ABECB. Given its favorable safety and tolerability profile, moxifloxacin administered once daily for 5 days may be as effective and a more convenient treatment than a standard course of clarithromycin for patients with ABECB.     

Telithromycin is as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanate in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

This randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a short, 5-day course of telithromycin, a new ketolide antibacterial, compared with a standard 10-day course of amoxicillin/clavulanate, in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). The study enrolled 325 adult patients with AECB and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients received either telithromycin 800 mg once daily (qd) for 5 days (followed by placebo for 5 days) or amoxicillin/clavulanate 500/125 mg three times daily (tid) for 10 days. Clinical cure rates for telithromycin post-therapy (Days 17-21, test-of-cure) and late post-therapy (Days 31-36) were 86.1 and 78.1%, respectively; 82.1 and 75.0% for amoxicillin/clavulanate. Excellent clinical cure rates were also observed for high-risk patients. Bacteriologic outcome was satisfactory for 69.2% of telithromycin recipients vs 70.0% for amoxicillin/clavulanate recipients. Both treatments were generally well tolerated, although the frequency of drug-related adverse events was almost two-fold higher for amoxicillin/clavulanate (25.0 vs. 13.1%). Thus, a 5-day course of telithromycin 800 mg qd is an effective and well-tolerated alternative to a standard 10-day course of amoxicillin/clavulanate 500/125 mg tid for first-line empiric treatment of AECB in adults with COPD.     

Levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Antibiotic resistance and poor compliance are the main causes of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication failure. This study evaluated the eradication rate, tolerability, and compliance of levofloxacin- azithromycin combined triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. METHODS: 1) First-line eradication: A total of 78 H. pylori-positive patients were enrolled. Seventeen military men in Armed Forces Capital Hospital were treated with 7 days of levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid, levofloxacin 500 mg od, and azithromycin 500 mg od), and 61 patients in Kangbuk Samsung Hospital were treated with standard PPI-based triple therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 1.0 g bid, and clarithromycin 500 mg bid) for 7 days. 2) Second-line eradication: A consecutive series of 59 patients who failed H. pylori eradication with standard PPI-based triple therapy in Kangbuk Samsung Hospital were randomized to two groups. Thirty patients were retreated with 7 days of bismuth-based quadruple therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid, bismuth 120 mg qid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg qid), and remaining 29 patients were retreated with levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy. Patient's compliance and tolerability were evaluated at the end of treatment. The status of H. pylori infection was assessed 8 weeks later then. The successful eradication of H. pylori was defined as negative results from histology and CLO test, or 13C-urea breath test. RESULTS: First-line eradication rate of levofloxacin-azithromycin triple therapy was lower than that of standard PPI-based triple therapy, but there was no statistically significant difference (70.6% vs. 80.3%, p=0.390). Second-line eradication rate of levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy was significantly lower than that of bismuth-based quadruple therapy (ITT/PP 65.5%/73.1% vs. 90%/90%, p<0.0001). The compliances of all patients were more than 85%. Two of patients with levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy complained self-limiting side effects (mild dizziness; mild insomnia with general weakness). CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy should not be recommended as the first-line or second-line H. pylori eradication regimen in Korea.     

含莫西沙星三联疗法在老年幽门螺杆菌感染补救治疗中的疗效观察

目的观察含莫西沙星的三联疗法治疗老年初治失败的幽门螺杆菌（Hpylori）感染的临床疗效及不良反应。方法将94例经标准三联疗法治疗失败的Hpylori感染老年患者随机分成A组和B组,每组47例。A组给予口服雷贝拉唑20mg（2次／d）＋阿莫西林1g（2次／d）＋莫西沙星400mg（1次／d）;B组给予口服雷贝拉唑20mg（2次,d）＋枸橼酸铋钾300mg（4次／d）＋呋喃唑酮100mg（2次／d）＋阿莫两林ig（2次／d）。两组均治疗7d,治疗结束后4W进行”C尿素呼气检测试验。结果A、B两组的根除率（ITT）分别为91．5％和72．3％（P〈0．05）;不良反应发生率分别为8．5％和27．6％（P〈0．05）。结论莫西沙星三联疗法治疗仞治失败的老年幽门螺杆菌感染是一种有效,安全的治疗方案。     

Airway inflammation and etiology of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The etiologic role of bacterial pathogens isolated from sputum culture in 40 to 50% of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) is controversial. If bacterial pathogens cause these AECB, they should be associated with greater neutrophilic airway inflammation than pathogen-negative exacerbations. DESIGN: This hypothesis was tested by comparing levels of interleukin (IL)-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and neutrophil elastase (NE) in 81 sputum samples obtained from 45 patients with AECB. Four groups were compared. In the first three groups, nontypable Haemophilus influenzae (n = 20), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (n = 27), and Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 14) were isolated as sole pathogens, respectively. In the fourth group, only normal flora was isolated (n = 20). Paired samples, obtained from individual patients at different times, that differed in their culture results were also compared. SETTING: An outpatient research clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS: These patients were participating in a prospective, longitudinal study of the dynamics of bacterial infection in chronic bronchitis, for which they were seen in the study clinic on a monthly basis as well as when they were experiencing symptoms suggestive of AECB. INTERVENTIONS: None. Measurements and results: H influenzae exacerbations were associated with significantly higher sputum IL-8, TNF-alpha, and NE. M catarrhalis exacerbations demonstrated significantly higher sputum TNF-alpha and NE when compared to pathogen-negative exacerbations. H parainfluenzae-associated exacerbations had an inflammatory profile similar to pathogen-negative exacerbations. Sputum elastase level distinguished bacterial from nonbacterial AECB and correlated with clinical severity of the AECB. CONCLUSIONS: Increased airway inflammation associated with isolation of H influenzae and M catarrhalis supports an etiologic role of these pathogens in AECB.     

Bacterial resistance and pharmacodynamics as the basis for prescribing antibiotics in respiratory infections

The choice of antibiotic therapy in respiratory tract infections is usually empirical. However, this choice is complicated by the increasing prevalence of resistant strains among the major bacterial pathogens involved in these infections, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae. The aim of antimicrobial therapy in respiratory tract infections should be bacterial eradication, which is necessary to maximize clinical cure and minimize the development and spread of resistance. An increase in antimicrobial resistance reduces the probability of achieving eradication and increases the probability of clinical failure. Recent reports have demonstrated the clinical relevance of respiratory bacterial resistance to macrolides and some fluoroquinolones and betalactams. Unlike macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance, penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae can be overcome by increasing the dose, and hence increasing the time during which serum concentrations are above the MIC. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters can be used to establish breakpoints predictive of bacterial eradication. From the viewpoint of PK/PD, in Spain only high-doses of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (875/125 mg tid and 2000/125 mg bid) and levofloxacin, among the oral antibiotics considered, achieve optimal coverage against S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae.     

Comparative safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and ampicillin in the treatment of out-patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

In an open, randomized trial, adult non-hospitalized patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis were treated with 500 mg clarithromycin twice daily (n = 53) or 500 mg ampicillin four times daily (n = 50). Causative pathogens included S. pneumoniae, M. catarrhalis, H. influenzae, H. parainfluenzae and S. aureus. For clinically evaluable patients, successful outcome (cure or improvement) was noted for 53/53 (100%) clarithromycin-treated patients and 46/47 (98%) ampicillin-treated patients. Clinically significant improvement in signs and symptoms was comparable between treatment groups. There was 100% bacteriological eradication in both treatment groups. Eight patients (15%) in the clarithromycin group and 10 patients (20%) in the ampicillin group reported adverse events, the majority of which were mild or moderate in severity; six events in each treatment group were digestive-system disorders. The new macrolide, clarithromycin, appears to be effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.     

A comparison of the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039) and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis in adults. The Sinusitis Study Group

The aim of this multicentre, randomized study was to compare the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039), a new 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone, with that of cefuroxime axetil for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis in adults. Diagnosis was made on a range of clinical signs and symptoms combined with radiology and microbiology. A 400 mg dose of moxifloxacin was administered once daily for 7 days to 242 patients and 250 mg twice daily of cefuroxime axetil was administered to 251 patients for 10 days. The clinical success rate at the end of treatment in the evaluable population was significantly higher (96.7%) in the moxifloxacin group (204/211) than in the cefuroxime axetil group (204/225, 90.7%; 95% confidence intervals 1.5%; 10.6%). At follow-up the success rate in the moxifloxacin group was 90.7% and that for the cefuroxime axetil group was 89.2% (95% confidence intervals -4.3%; 5.4%). The predominant pathogens isolated were Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, followed by Moraxella catarrhalis and Staphylococcus aureus. The bacteriological eradication rates were higher for moxifloxacin (94.5%, 103/109) than for cefuroxime axetil (83.5%, 96/115; 95% CI 3.6%; 19.7%). Only one S. pneumoniae infection persisted following moxifloxacin therapy in contrast with three in individuals on cefuroxime axetil. There were slightly more adverse events in the moxifloxacin group than in the cefuroxime axetil group, but there were fewer serious adverse events following moxifloxacin treatment (three vs. eight). The drug was discontinued because of adverse events in 14 moxifloxacin patients and in 11 cefuroxime axetil patients. Overall, in all assessments, moxifloxacin was at least as effective clinically and bacteriologically, and as well tolerated, as cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute sinusitis.     

The efficacy and safety of two oral moxifloxacin regimens compared to oral clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

An international multi-centre, randomized, prospective, double-blind study compared oral moxifloxacin (200 mg or 400 mg once daily for 10 days) with oral clarithromycin (500 mg, twice daily for 10 days) in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The clinical success rate in the evaluable population at the primary efficacy assessment, 3-5 days after the end of study treatment, was 93.9% in patients treated with 200 mg moxifloxacin; 94.4%, with 400 mg moxifloxacin; and 94.3%, with clarithromycin. Clinical success rates were maintained at follow-up, 21-28 days after the end of treatment: 90.7% (200 mg moxifloxacin), 92.8% (400 mg moxifloxacin) and 92.2% (clarithromycin). The 95% confidence intervals indicated that all three treatment regimens were equally effective in treating CAP. At follow-up, the 400 mg moxifloxacin dose had a slightly higher observed cure rate than the 200 mg moxifloxacin dose, but this was not statistically significant. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (42%), Haemophilus influenzae (19%), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (10%), Moraxella catarrhalis (6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5%) and Staphylococcus aureus (4%). The bacteriological success rate (eradication and presumed eradication) was 72.5% (29/40) for 200 mg moxifloxacin, 78.7% (37/47) for 400 mg moxifloxacin and 70.7% (29/41) for clarithromycin. The adverse event profile was comparable between the three treatment groups. Most adverse events, possibly or probably related to the study drug, were generally mild or moderate in severity and mostly related to the digestive system: diarrhoea, nausea and abdominal pain in 200 mg moxifloxacin patients; diarrhoea, liver function abnormalities and nausea in 400 mg moxifloxacin patients and liver function abnormalities, diarrhoea, nausea and taste perversion in clarithromycin patients. Study drugs were discontinued because of adverse events in 7/229 (3%) patients treated with 200 mg moxifloxacin, 11/224 (5%) with moxifloxacin 400 mg and 11/222 (5%) with clarithromycin. In all assessments, moxifloxacin was at least as effective clinically, and as well tolerated as clarithromycin in the treatment of CAP. Bacteriological success rates in moxifloxacin-treated patients were greater than those of clarithromycin. Moxifloxacin, given once daily, is free of many drug-drug interactions and requires no dosage adjustments in most renal hepatic deficient patients.     

Moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in outpatient acute exacerbations of COPD: MAESTRAL results

Bacterial infections causing acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) frequently require antibacterial treatment. More evidence is needed to guide antibiotic choice. The Moxifloxacin in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis TriaL (MAESTRAL) was a multiregional, randomised, double-blind non-inferiority outpatient study. Patients were aged ≥ 60 yrs, with an Anthonisen type I exacerbation, a forced expiratory volume in 1 s < 60% predicted and two or more exacerbations in the last year. Following stratification by steroid use patients received moxifloxacin 400 mg p.o. q.d. (5 days) or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 875/125 mg p.o. b.i.d. (7 days). The primary end-point was clinical failure 8 weeks post-therapy in the per protocol population. Moxifloxacin was noninferior to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid at the primary end-point (111 (20.6%) out of 538, versus 114 (22.0%) out of 518, respectively; 95% CI -5.89-3.83%). In patients with confirmed bacterial AECOPD, moxifloxacin led to significantly lower clinical failure rates than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (in the intent-to-treat with pathogens, 62 (19.0%) out of 327 versus 85 (25.4%) out of 335, respectively; p=0.016). Confirmed bacterial eradication at end of therapy was associated with higher clinical cure rates at 8 weeks post-therapy overall (p=0.0014) and for moxifloxacin (p=0.003). Patients treated with oral corticosteroids had more severe disease and higher failure rates. The MAESTRAL study showed that moxifloxacin was as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of outpatients with AECOPD. Both therapies were well tolerated.     

Sequential IV/PO moxifloxacin treatment of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND: IV/PO moxifloxacin was evaluated in the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: Data were pooled from two prospective, randomized studies. In the multinational study, patients received 7-14 days IV/PO moxifloxacin 400 mg QD or IV/ PO amoxicillin clavulanate 1200/625 mg TID +/- IV/PO clarithromycin 500 mg BID. In the North American study, patients received 7-14 days IV/PO moxifloxacin 400 mg QD, IV/ PO alatrofloxacin/trovafloxacin 200 mg QD, or IV/PO levofloxacin 500 mg QD. The primary endpoint was clinical success at the test-to-cure visit. Severe CAP was defined according to the 1993 ATS criteria. RESULTS: In the clinically valid population, clinical success rates were 88% (167/190) for moxifloxacin- and 83% (155/186) for comparator-treated patients (95% CI = -1.9%, 12.2%). Corresponding clinical success rates for the microbiologically valid population were 87% (59/68) and 84% (54/64), respectively (95% CI = 8.6%, 15.0%). A switch from IV to PO therapy was made by day 5 of therapy for 73% of moxifloxacin- vs. 60% of comparator-treated patients (P < 0.01). Clinical success rates were similar in a retrospective analysis using the revised 2001 ATS definition of severe CAP. Mortality rates were 6% (15/241) and 10% (24/238) in the moxifloxacin and comparator treatment groups, respectively. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Sequential IV/PO moxifloxacin 400 mg QD is as safe and effective as other fluoroquinolones and a beta-lactam/macrolide combination for treating hospitalized patients with severe CAP.