Relationship between US medical school admission policy and graduates entering family practice

Rural areas in the United States continue to lack an adequate supply of primary care doctors, particularly family physicians, despite the oversupply of physicians nationally. Previous studies have provided strong evidence that students from rural backgrounds, as well as those who expressed an interest at the time of medical school admission for a career in family medicine, are significantly more likely to eventually practise family medicine in rural areas than their peers. US medical schools were classified into three groups based on their written selection factors for preferentially admitting students into the graduating class of 1982. Of those schools with selection factors for students from both a rural background and an interest in a future career in family medicine, 23.7% of their graduates entered family medicine training programmes. This compares with 14.5% of graduates from schools with a preference for students from a rural background, and 12.4% from all other schools (P less than 0.001). Coupled with previous data which shows that family physicians from rural areas are more likely to eventually practise in rural areas than their peers, preferentially admitting students from rural backgrounds interested in a career in family medicine could help to solve the problem of the shortage of primary care physicians in rural areas in the US.     

Foreign medical graduates and U.S. physician supply: old issues and new questions

Recent increases in the number of foreign medical graduates (FMGs) in U.S. hospital-training positions raise new questions about the future role of FMGs in U.S. medicine. Despite an historical surplus of physicians, forces such as greater demand for resident house officers, stabilization in undergraduate medical education enrollment, increase in demand for medical services, growth in both the number of women in medicine and physician employment in group practices, and continuing imbalances in the distribution of physicians favor FMG migration to the United States. Health system reform must be sensitive to the historical, current, and future role FMGs play in medical care delivery, especially in regard to service in underserved areas, specialties, and employment settings.     

Predicting career decisions in primary care medicine: a theoretical analysis

Entering the 1960s, more than half of the medical doctors in the United States were family physicians, pediatricians, or general internists. Today, about one-third of all U.S. physicians are primary care practitioners. Although opinions vary on the optimal ratio of primary care to specialty physicians, in the mid-1990s, the consensus among leaders in medicine was that more primary care physicians would be needed to ensure access to quality care. The target output of graduates was set for a minimum of 50% primary care physicians, and medical school admission committees responded. The present study examines research related to career decision making in primary care medicine. We address career decision making in primary care with the expectation that selection of a medical residency is based on multiple factors, and multivariate statistical techniques comprise the most appropriate statistical procedure for developing predictive models of medical student residency choice. Additional multivariate studies for simultaneous analysis of multiple dependent and multiple independent variables are needed to determine whether health policy planners and medical schools should continue to address the distribution of primary care physicians through medical school admissions. Further to enabling prediction, researchers must renew efforts to base investigations on theoretical models, summarizing and organizing previous research, and providing one another with means to focus future studies while building on previous work.     

Preventive care attitudes of medical students

Presently developing attitudes of future physicians towards preventive medicine will likely provide either a major impetus for or barriers to the inclusion of preventive medicine content in medical school curricula and in other formats of physician education. In turn, attitudes about preventive care and its role in medical practice will continue to have a large influence on how much disease prevention and health promotion emphasis physicians provide in their practices. Consequently, it becomes important to study how medical students' attitudes evolve during the process of medical education. Furthermore, to the extent that we can better understand how desired attitudes can be developed and nurtured, the practice of preventive medicine may become more purposeful. Beginning and third-year medical students were surveyed with a 100-item questionnaire designed to assess their attitudes regarding: the relative importance of 20 specific preventive services to the practice of medicine and the adequacy of preclinical coursework for preparing them to offer preventive care in medical practice. The confidence of third year students' in the ability of primary care physicians to provide these specific services was also assessed. Preventive care service areas about which third-year students expressed high confidence in the ability of physicians to provide were: immunizations, health screening physicals, blood pressure control, cancer detection education, family planning, health counseling/education, and sexually transmitted disease prevention. Services that students had low confidence in the ability of physicians to provide were: smoking cessation, nutrition counseling/education and weight reduction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

An analysis of medical students' residency and specialty choices

The contemporary geographic maldistribution of physicians and shortages in some specialty areas is a persistent problem facing United States federal and state wide health planners. This paper attempts to illustrate some of the formal and informal processes of the selection of specialties and residency programs based on a survey of senior students of 37 selected American medical schools at the time of the National Residency Matching Program in 1982. Results of a factor analysis on influences on specialty choice produced two major clusters of medical students; those predominantly influenced in specialty choice by the faculty and other senior physicians (sponsorship), and those predominantly influenced by the social dimension of the physicians' role (social responsibility). These medical specialty choice orientations were also systematically related to either choice of specialty vs primary care medicine, to a life-style or status related choice of residency program, and to students' perceptions regarding a program's evaluation of a candidate. The results of the survey suggested that students who chose primary care were more apt to be influenced by sources outside of the medical school. These findings raise questions regarding the efficacy of medical school curriculum in motivating career choices in primary care. This is particularly important in view of the stated need to increase the proportion of medical school graduates choosing primary care careers.     

Long-term outcomes of primary care residency choice by graduating medical students in one medical school

The ratio of primary care physicians to subspecialists is of major importance to the future of American medicine. This study examined the output of primary care physicians by a state-supported medical school that has a goal of placing 50% of its graduates in primary care. Data were obtained from alumni office questionnaires and published board-certification listings for 1102 graduates of the University of Kentucky College of Medicine from 1973 through 1983. Fifty percent of these graduates chose residency training in primary care. Of all 1102 graduates, 37% are categorized as practicing primary care physicians; 29% of the total are board certified in a primary care discipline. Attrition from primary care as an initial career choice at entry into residency was 26%. With declining medical student interest in primary care and a shortage of primary care physicians, new initiatives in medical education and in the practice of medicine are necessary to balance the specialty distribution of physicians more favorably toward primary care.     

International medical graduates and the primary care workforce for rural underserved areas

The proportion of international medical graduates (IMGs) serving as primary care physicians in rural underserved areas (RUAs) has important policy implications. We analyzed the 2000 American Medical Association Masterfile and Area Resource File to calculate the percentage of primary care IMGs, relative to U.S. medical graduates (USMGs), working in RUAs. We found that 2.1 percent of both primary care USMGs and IMGs were in RUAs, where USMGs were more likely to be family physicians but less likely to be internists or pediatricians. IMGs appear to have been no more likely than USMGs were to practice primary care in RUAs, but the distribution by specialty differs.     

The Rural Physician Workforce in Florida: A Survey of US- and Foreign-Born Primary Care Physicians

CONTEXT: To meet the challenge of primary care needs in rural areas, continuing assessment of the demographics, training, and future work plans of practicing primary care physicians is needed. PURPOSE: This study's goal was to assess key characteristics of primary care physicians practicing in rural, suburban, and urban communities in Florida. METHODS: Surveys were mailed to all of Florida's rural primary care physicians (n = 399) and a 10% sampling (n = 1236) of urban and suburban primary care physicians. FINDINGS: Responses from 1000 physicians (272 rural, 385 urban, 343 suburban) showed that rural physicians were more likely to have been raised in a rural area, foreign-born and trained, a National Health Service Corps member, or a J-1 visa waiver program participant. Rural physicians were more likely to have been exposed to rural medical practice or living in a rural environment during their medical school and residency training. Factors such as rural upbringing and medical school training did not predict future rural practice with foreign-born physicians. Overall, future plans for practice did not seem to differ between rural, urban, and suburban physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Recruiting and retaining doctors in rural areas can be best supported through a mission-driven selection of medical students with subsequent training in medical school and residency in rural health issues. National programs such as the National Health Service Corps and the J-1 visa waiver program also play important roles in rural physician selection and should be taken into account when planning for future rural health care needs.     

Feminization of medicine]

Since 1985 more than 50% of all medical students in the Netherlands are women. Only a tiny fraction of specialists, professors, directors of hospitals or insurance companies are women, however. Feminization of medicine will balance the skewed male medical culture. This will improve health care for women and career planning for women doctors. Encouraging part time work will generate incentives to enhance the continuity of medical care for patients in general.     

U.S. medical students' attitudes about patients' access to care

OBJECTIVE: Accessing adequate medical services remains a major struggle for many Americans, but U.S. medical students' beliefs regarding access to care have not been thoroughly examined. METHODS: All medical students in the Class of 2003 at 16 U.S. schools were eligible to complete three questionnaires during their medical training: during freshman orientation, orientation to wards, and their senior year (n=2316, response rate=80.3%). Students responded to three questions about health care provision. RESULTS: Overall, 35% of students strongly agreed that "physicians have a responsibility to take care of patients regardless of their ability to pay;" only 5% disagreed. Only 8% disagreed that "access to basic health care is a fundamental human right." We found the same significant associations with opinions on access as we did with "responsibility to treat," although the associations tended to be stronger for access. Only 10% of students agreed that "Managed care, as it is now delivered, is a good way to deliver health care to the U.S. population." CONCLUSION: Most U.S. medical students support universal access to medical care, though variations in this support, its decline with additional years of medical education, and concerns about managed care are noteworthy, and have policy implications for America's health and health care workforce.     

Errors of alternative medicine: lessons for general practice

Abstract

Background: Due to the importance of family medicine and a relative shortage of doctors in this discipline, it is important to know how the decision to choose a career in this field is made.

Objective: Since this decision is closely linked to students’ attitudes towards family medicine, we were interested in identifying those attitudes that predict intended career choice in family medicine.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed among 316 final-year medical students of the Ljubljana Medical Faculty in Slovenia. The students filled out a 164-item questionnaire, developed based on the European definition of family medicine and the EURACT Educational Agenda, using a seven-point Likert scale containing attitudes towards family medicine. The students also recorded their interest in family medicine on a five-point Likert scale. Attitudes were selected using a feature selection procedure with artificial neural networks that best differentiated between students who are likely and students who are unlikely to become family physicians.

Results: Thirty-one out of 164 attitudes predict a career in family medicine, with a classification accuracy of at least 85%. Predictors of intended career choice in family medicine are related to three categories: understanding of the discipline, working in a coherent health care system and person-centredness. The most important predictor is an appreciation of a long-term doctor–patient relationship.

Conclusion: Students whose intended career choice is family medicine differ from other students in having more positive attitudes towards family physicians’ competences and towards characteristics of family medicine and primary care.     

Career preference and choice of practice locations by Saudi medical students

Summary. The identification of career preference and intended practice location of medical students may provide a useful contribution to the projections and distribution of doctors across different specialties in the country. Information for this study was obtained from a survey of medical students in the final years at King Saud University College of Medicine in Saudi Arabia. This included demographic characteristics, career choice, training location, qualification in view and intended practice locations. The majority (61.2%) intended to specialize and subsequently practise in the major disciplines of medicine, surgery, paediatrics and obstetrics. Twenty-eight per cent were not sure of their future career choice. Only a few (3.5%) chose primary care and none chose pathology or anaesthesia. More men chose medicine, paediatrics and surgery, but more women chose obstetrics and primary care. The majority (81.2%) would like to have foreign certificates, but all the Saudis would subsequently practice in Saudi Arabia and mainly in large cities. The implications of this career pattern and practise locations are discussed with recommendations for health planners and medical schools.     

The feminization of the medical profession in Israel

Two factors have caused major changes in the gender composition of the Israeli medical profession in recent years: (i) a wave of immigration from the former USSR, which increased the doctor population by approximately 70% and which included a majority of women physicians, and (ii) the entry of more Israeli women into medical school. This report presents the current gender status of the Israeli medical profession, regarding students and physicians, and the choice of medical specialty and academic seniority, and compares gender differences in Israel with those in other countries.
Traditional patterns of specialization persist in Israel, with women still concentrated in primary care (family medicine, paediatrics and psychiatry). In addition, women still face obstacles in entering the more prestigious (mainly surgical) specialties. Whilst the number of women in academic medicine has increased over the last decade, women are still concentrated in the lowest echelons of academic medicine. However, the steady trend towards the feminization of medicine will inevitably lead to an increase of women in all areas of the medical profession. Because cross-cultural studies have repeatedly revealed that women doctors have a more humanistic and personalized approach to patient care, a higher ratio of women in the profession should have a qualitative effect in this direction, despite the bureaucratic and fiscal constraints incumbent upon practising doctors. As more women become role models for medical students, their approach will influence the education of the doctors of the future.     

Reforming medical education: A review and synthesis of five critiques of medical practice

For physicians to provide appropriate healthcare at a reasonable cost, health reform may not be enough. This essay discusses the scope of educational reform needed in the U.S. to train tomorrow’s physicians to practice effectively in an increasingly complicated health care arena. We undertook a review and synthesis of five critiques of medical practice in the U.S.: of quality, evidence-based medicine, population medicine, health policy and heuristics. Our findings suggest that physicians are inadequately trained to function in the complex organizational and social systems that characterize modern practice. Successful health care reform in the U.S. will require physicians who are trained not only in bio-medicine, but also in the social sciences. Other developed countries, which have both greater government control of health care and a culture less oriented to individualism, may have less need for specific efforts to train physicians in the social sciences but could still benefit from considering an expanded curriculum. Effective educational reform must address the medical admissions process, academic and intellectual preparation, and professional and clinical training.     

Gender Roles,Medical Practice Roles,and Ob-Gyn Career Choice

This paper discusses follow-up data from physicians who were studied ten years earlier when they were medical students. Seventeen physicians were practicing ob-gyn, and 57 of the physicians studied had been interested in an ob-gyn career when they were medical students. At Time 1, women were more likely than men to be strongly interested in ob-gyn, but they were no more likely than men to be ob-gyn physicians at Time 2. The desire to have a surgical specialty was much more important to men than to. women practitioners. Men ob-gyn practitioners were significantly more traditional in their sex-role outlook as medical students than were either women practitioners or women who had been stron ly t interested in the field but did not enter it. The data suggest t at women ob-gyn physicians are more likely than their male peers to be egalitarian in their relationships with female patients.     

Gender roles, medical practice roles, and ob-gyn career choice: a longitudinal study

This paper discusses follow-up data from physicians who were studied ten years earlier when they were medical students. Seventeen physicians were practicing ob-gyn, and 57 of the physicians studied had been interested in an ob-gyn career when they were medical students. At Time 1, women were more likely than men to be strongly interested in ob-gyn, but they were no more likely than men to be ob-gyn physicians at Time 2. The desire to have a surgical specialty was much more important to men than to women practitioners. Men ob-gyn practitioners were significantly more traditional in their sex-role outlook as medical students than were either women practitioners or women who had been strongly interested in the field but did not enter it. The data suggest that women ob-gyn physicians are more likely than their male peers to be egalitarian in their relationships with female patients.     

American and Soviet medical manpower: growth and evolution, 1910-1970.

Between 1910 and 1970 the number of physicians in the United States increased 2.5 times, in Soviet Russia almost 25 times. The number of physicians per constant unit of population remained fairly stable in the United States, rising slightly in the last few years. In the U.S.S.R. that number increased 16 to 18 times, and now stands about 50 per cent higher than in the United States. About 10 per cent of American physicians are women; in the U.S.S.R. it is about 70 per cent. Neither society has resolved the problem of deploying physicians to the rural areas. American physicians are more specialized than their Soviet colleagues. The article concludes with general remarks about the two health systems, pointing out resemblances and divergences. The hypothesis of a possible "convergence" is entertained.     

The Distribution of Rural Female Generalist Physicians in the United States

Abstract: Female physicians are underrepresented in rural areas. What impact might the increasing proportion of women in medicine have on the rural physician shortage? To begin addressing this question, we present data describing the geographic distribution of female physicians in the United States. We examine the geographic distribution of all active U.S. allopathic physicians recorded in the October 1996 update of the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Percentages and numbers of female physicians by professional activity, specialty type, and geographic location are reported. Findings reveal there were fewer than 7,000 female allopathic physicians practicing in rural America in 1996. The proportion of generalist female physicians who practice in rural settings was significantly lower than the proportion who practice in urban locations. Although members of the most recent 10‐year medical school graduation cohort of female generalist physicians were slightly more likely to practice in rural areas than members of earlier cohorts, female physicians remained significantly underrepresented in rural areas. States varied dramatically in rural female generalist underrepresentation. Should female generalists continue to be underrepresented in rural locations, the rural physician shortage will not be resolved quickly. Effective strategies to improve rural female physician placement and retention need to be identified and implemented to improve rural access to physician care.     

Effect of managed care and financing on practice constraints and career satisfaction in primary care

BACKGROUND: The shift away from third party insurers to risk-sharing arrangements affecting care management and clinicians could be the most fundamental change in the health care system. Analysis was undertaken to study how managed care, practice setting, and financial arrangements affect physicians' perceived impact on their practice. METHODS: Data were taken from the Community Tracking Study (CTS) physician survey, a national survey of active physicians in the United States fielded between August 1996 and August 1997. Survey instruments were completed by 7,146 primary care physicians in internal medicine (2,355), family practice (3,168), and pediatrics (1,623). The dependent variables are career satisfaction and perceived limitations and pressures on time spent with patients, clinical freedom, income, and continuity. To study the unique effect of financing and gatekeeping arrangements and practice setting, the dependent variables were regressed on gatekeeping, practice revenue, individual physician compensation, practice setting, specialty, age-group, sex, international medical graduate, board certification, and recent change in practice ownership. RESULTS: Total managed care revenue, or individual physician incentives, have no effect on career satisfaction and relatively limited effects on time pressure, income pressure, or patient continuity. In contrast, primary care gatekeeping has a highly significant adverse effect on the same outcome measures. After controlling for financial factors, demographic characteristics, and training differences, physicians in solo and 2-physician practices are significantly more likely to be dissatisfied with their medical career, more likely to report no clinical freedom, and more likely to feel income pressure than physicians in group practices, staff model HMOs, medical schools, or other settings. CONCLUSION: Physicians in solo and 2-physician practices were least satisfied with their careers and reported more constraints on their clinical freedom and income than physicians in other settings. Physicians in group practices or staff model HMOs are more likely to report time pressure than physicians in solo or 2-physician practices. Family practice falls between internal medicine (less satisfied, more practice constraints) and pediatrics (more satisfied, fewer practice constraints).     

Professional integrity in the age of managed care: views of physicians.

At the end of 1997, one quarter of the American public used health maintenance organizations. This paper reports findings on physicians' perspectives on the role of managed care in their professional practices. The research data come from mailed surveys to physicians who are selected from the Cigna Directory of Physicians practicing in the State of Ohio. Subjects were asked to explain what managed care meant to them, and how long they have been practicing medicine. Questions also focused on professional autonomy, quality of care and career aspirations for the future. The results from the study suggest that managed care has had a negative impact on how physicians practice medicine. Several of our respondents reported that they are playing the role of a "double agent" and feel a sense of frustration in doing so. The degree of antipathy toward managed care differs between primary care physicians and specialists.