''Long-Term Results of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia

Between 1979 and 1984 the Cybertach-60, (Intermedics, Inc. Model 262-01), a programmable, automatic antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 11 patients who had drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The patients have been followed for a total of 64-108 (mean 84 months). All patients were symptomatic and had failed two or more drugs and six patients had required prior DC cardioversion. The mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia was atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry in six patients, AV reentry in four patients, and atrial tachycardia in one patient. Preoperatively all patients had reliable termination of the tachycardia without induction of atrial fibrillation by pacing methods available to Cybertach-60. Postimplant, Cybertach-60 reliably terminated all episodes of tachycardia without ancillary drug therapy. Nevertheless, at long-term follow-up antitachycardia pacing was effective and safe in the minority (36%), with only four patients out of eleven still using a pacemaker for supraventricular tachycardia. One of these four patients required additional drug therapy. In one of the patients, the Cybertach-60 was replaced after 78 months by a more advanced device, (Intertach, Intermedics, Inc.) because of a depleted Cybertach-60 battery. In seven patients who no longer use antitachycardia pacing for termination of tachycardia, one patient developed atrial fibrillation during tachycardia termination (at 58 months postimplant). Three patients experienced induction of tachycardia or atrial fibrillation by the pacemaker due to undersensing of sinus P waves (at 36, 48, and 51 months).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Clinical Experience with a New Software-Based Antitachycardia Pacemaker for Recurrent Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardias

The Intermedics Intertach 262-12 tachycardia reversion pulse generator was implanted in 14 patients (six male, eight female, mean age at implantation 45 +/- 16 years) with recurrent symptomatic tachycardias. Six patients had atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia, three patients had orthodromic tachycardia with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, two had circus movement tachycardia via a concealed bypass tract, two had ventricular tachycardia, one patient had atrial flutter. Mean duration of symptoms before implantation was 8 +/- 4 years and mean number of antiarrhythmic drug trials was 3.5 +/- 1. The primary tachycardia response made consisted of autodecremental pacing in one patient, burst pacing in two patients, and adaptive scanning of the initial delay or burst cycle length in eleven patients. The secondary tachycardia response mode consisted of autodecremental pacing in four patients, burst pacing in three patients and burst scanning in four patients. Tachycardia response was automatic in all but one patient with ventricular tachycardia. During a follow-up period of 30.5 +/- 10.6 months, one patient with ventricular tachycardia died from a nonarrhythmic cause. Reinterventions were necessary due to electrode fracture in one patient and due to pacemaker software defect in another one. Two patients underwent surgical cure of their arrhythmia: one patient with atrial flutter and one patient with AV nodal reentry tachycardia, 24 months and 11 months postpacemaker implantation, respectively. Four patients required digitalis to prevent pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Other proarrhythmic effects were not encountered. The pacemaker proved to be a versatile system with reliable tachycardia detection and termination functions. It provided a valuable adjunctive therapy in these selected patients.     

Comparison of Two Antitachycardia Pacing Modes in Supraventricular Tachycardia

The comparative efficacy of two different antitachycardia pacing techniques was evaluated in 22 consecutive patients who received the pacemaker Intertach® with an atrial electrode for drug refractory, recurrent Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The Intertach® has two consecutive programmable primary and secondary termination modes. The termination programs investigated were adaptive autodecremental burst pacing and adaptive decremental scanning. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was present in 15 patients and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia due to Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in seven patients. The prospective comparison was arranged in a randomized, cross-over study over a period of 12 months. To assess long-term efficacy, diagnostic data of the pacemakers were obtained in intervals of 3 months. In addition, noninvasive programmed stimulation was performed to compare the incidence of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation with both termination programs. During a follow-up of 12 months the overall success rate of autodecremental burst pacing and decremental scanning was 80% and 95%, respectively. Decremental scanning was more effective in 12 patients and less successful in two patients than autodecremental burst pacing. During noninvasive electrophysiological studies, pacing induced atrial fibrillation could be documented in three often patients (30%) using autodecremental burst pacing, compared to one often patients (10%) using decremental scanning. These data suggest that decremental scanning proved to be more successful in the long-term management of patients with recurrent S VT than autodecremental burst pacing. Furthermore, the occurrence of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation could be documented more frequently with autodecremental burst pacing compared to decremental scanning.     

Permanent Overdrive Atrial Pacing in the Chronic Management of Recurrent Postoperative Atrial Reentrant Tachycardia in Patients with Complex Congenital Heart Disease

This study investigated the value of permanent atrial pacing as an adjunct to the current therapy in the chronic management of recurrent postoperative atrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with complex congenital heart disease. We studied the postpacing clinical course in 18 patients with recurrent atrial reentrant tachycardias unresponsive to conventional therapy who had an implanted atrial pacemaker. The pacemaker was programmed at a lower pacing rate 20% faster than the spontaneous mean daily rate previously determined with 24-hour Holter monitoring. Serial Holter recordings and pacemaker programming sessions were subsequently performed trying to mantain a paced atrial rhythm overdriving the spontaneous rhythm as long as possible. Twenty-four hour Holter monitoring documented a prevalent (> 80%) paced rhythm during the daily hours in all patients during the follow-up; all patients, however, required at least once a variation In programmed mode and pacing rate. Antiarrhythmic medications were discontinued after 6 months if the patient remained arrhythmia free while on pacing. Recurrences of atrial reentrant tachycardia occurred in five patients (29%) during the initial 6 months interval after the pacemaker implantation, while late recurrences occurred in only two patients (11 %). One patient died suddenly 10 months after the pacemaker implant. At the end of the follow-up, 15 patients (83%) were arrhythmia-free and only 2 of them were still on antiarrhythmic drugs. We conclude that permanent atrial overdrive pacing can be an important tool in the management of patients with atrial reentrant tachycardia following repair of congenital heart disease.     

Termination Of Sustained Tachycardia By External Noninvasive Pacing

Invasive cardiac pacing has proved useful in the induction and termination of reentrant sustained tachycardias. In one of our two cases, programmed ventricular extra-stimulation was used to induce sustained ventricular tachycardia from the endocardial surface of the right ventricle. Induced ventricular tachycardia was terminated by burst ventricular pacing with an external cardiac pacemaker. In our second patient, external pacing was effective at inducing and terminating sustained supraventricular tachycardia. These patients illustrate that the principles of terminating sustained reentrant tachycardia with invasive pacing may also apply to noninvasive external pacing. The usefulness of this approach in treating reentrant tachycardias needs further evaluation.     

Comparative Effectiveness of Pacing Techniques for Termination of Well-Tolerated Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardias can be terminated by a variety of pacemaker techniques, including rapid and slow stimulation. Fast tachycardias are typically poorly tolerated, and require prompt intervention, usually with rapid pacing. Termination of ventricular tachycardia by slow or single capture pacemaker stimulation techniques is attractive, because of its presumed safety and the possibility of using simple implantable pacers. To identify factors favoring termination, single capture stimulation was used in 390 episodes of ventricular tachycardia in 21 patients, 16 with coronary artery disease, able to tolerate ventricular tachycardia forseveral minutes. Single capture stimulation terminated 223 episodes (57%) in 18 patients, and two were accelerated. Of 157 episodes exposed to 2–3 programmed extrastimuli or rapid pacing 149 (94%) were terminated and 7 were accelerated. Direct current cardioversion was needed in 12 episodes. Without medications, only two patients tolerated VT. Only one patient had reliable termination with single capture stimulation over several days. Systolic blood pressure was similar in episodes terminated and not terminated by single capture stimulation, but the ventricular rate was significantly lower in episodes terminated, 116 ± 19 vs. 133 ±24 (p<0.001). Termination of ventricular tachycardia was not affected by QRS morphology. Single capture termination of ventricular tachycardia is largely unpredictable, with limited reproducibility over a period of time. Although comparatively safe, single capture techniques are not likely toprove useful in the long-term treatment of many patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia.     

Initiation of Ventricular Tachycardia by Interruption of Pacemaker-Mediated Tachycardia in a Patient with a Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

A 74-year-old man with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator implanted 3 years before experienced multiple ventricular tachycardias (VTs). All episodes were initiated by pacemaker-mediated tachycardia (PMT) that was either stopped by atrial undersensing or the tachycardia termination algorithm of the device. After the termination of PMT, two rapid ventricular paced beats, the first initiated by artificial triggering and the second due to retrograde conduction of the first one, initiated VT that was successfully terminated by antitachycardia pacing or a direct current shock of the device . All episodes revealed this pattern of initiation with a short-long-short ventricular sequence inducing VT.     

The Importance of Antitachycardia Pacing for Patients Presenting with Ventricular Tachycardia

The initial experience from electrophysiological studies showed that pacing induced termination of ventricular tachycardias is usually possible but requires a critical pacing sequence. Studies on the resetting phenomenon showed, in most instances of failure of termination, that the "limiting factor" to produce ventricular tachycardia termination is usually failure to produce block within the circuit rather than failure to access or interact with the ventricular tachycardia origin. The resetting response is related to tachycardia termination in a number of ways. Of note is that a steeply increasing resetting pattern usually predicts tachycardia termination. Between 50% and 90% of induced ventricular tachycardias will be terminated by trains of rapid ventricular pacing. The analysis of the pacing rate necessary for termination shows that it varies widely. Paced cycle lengths of < 80% of tachycardia cycle length are necessary in at least 20% of tachycardias. In contrast, the incidence of acceleration is closely related to the paced cycle length: it is negligible with paced cycle lengths over 80% of tachycardia cycle length and increases to 36% with paced cycle lengths below 76% of tachycardia cycle length. Present information about efficacy of antitachycardia pacing in spontaneous tachycardias suggests that it is extremely effective, with over 90% success. However, it is likely that these data correspond to a selected group of tachycardias.     

Effect of Atrial Pacing on the Frequency of Tachycardia in Patients with Recurrent Junctional Tachycardia

In order to assess whether atrial pacing reduced the frequency of tachycardia in patients with recurrent junctional tachycardias, ten patients with recurrent junctional tachycardias with atrial Intertach antitachycardia pacemakers in situ were paced in a random order in atrial demand mode at 50 ppm (AAI 50), 80 ppm (AAI 80), and 100 ppm (AAI 100) for a period of up to 1 month. The numbers of tachycardias detected by the pacemaker over this period were recorded and compared with the number seen when unpaced (000). Correct arrhythmia detection by the pacemaker was confirmed by Holter monitoring. The number of tachycardias in 000 was 44.7 +/- 19.8 (mean +/- SEM). No significant reduction in tachycardia frequency was seen in any pacing mode. Back-up atrial pacing at 50 ppm tended to reduce the frequency of tachycardias (32.3 +/- 12.8 tachycardias; P = 0.06). The higher pacing rates increased the number of tachycardias (AAI 80; 57.1 +/- 24.6 tachycardias, P = 0.20: AAI 100; 81.8 +/- 30.2 tachycardias; P = 0.31). Symptoms increased with each pacing mode and palpitations were statistically more severe in AAI 100 mode. Four patients had disabling symptoms at this rate and had to drop out. Atrial back-up pacing may be of use in some patients with junctional tachycardia, but overdrive pacing is not helpful.     

The Impact of Antitachycardia Pacing with Defibrillation

Chronic recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be reproducibly terminated by programmed endocardiaJ right ventricular stimulation. However, antitachycardia pacing can be associated with possible acceleration of VT, while frequent episodes of VT and patient discomfort can limit treatment by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The combined use of antitachycardia pacing and the AICD (automatic implantable cardioverier defibrillator) was evaluated in 6 out of 51 patients (age 57 ± 11 years) in whom the AICD had been implanted because of recurrent VT. In each instance VT could be terminated by temporary overdrive pacing. The interactive mode of VT termination by a pacemaker (Tachylog) as well as by the AICD was assessed after implantation. In the automatic mode, the Tachylog functioned as a bipolar, ventricular inhibited (VVI) device with antitachycardia burst stimulation capability, allowing two to five stimuli at intervals of 260–300 ms and one or two interventions. During follow-up of 47 ± 24 months, the Tachylog terminated VT reliably 50–505 times per patient. When burst stimulation accelerated VT, termination was achieved by AICD discharge. Thus, drug resistant VT can be terminated by antitachycardia pacing to avoid patient discomfort. In the event of tachycardia acceleration, VT was terminated by the AICD. A universal pacemaker-defibrillafor should combine antibradycardia and antitachycardia pacing with back-up cardioversion defibrillation.     

A Case Report Demonstrating Spontaneous Change in Tachycardia Terminating Window

A patient who received a patient-activated pacemaker system for termination of paroxysmal, drug-resistant, ventricular tachycardia is described. During the pre-implant invasive electrophysiological (EP) study and the three post-implant non-invasive EP studies, tachycardias were easily and reproducibly terminated by two stimuli using the interval scanning mode. On the fourth day post-implant, this pacing mode no longer terminated tachycardia at rest. A new pacing mode using more stimuli was then found to terminate the tachycardia reproducibly under various physiological conditions. This case report demonstrated a spontaneous change in the tachycardia terminating window and the usefulness of versatility in antitachycardia pacemaker systems.     

Limitations to Activation of the Antitachycardia Burst Pacing Function of the Symbios 7008 Pacemaker in the Universal (DDD) Mode

The Symbios 7008 antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in five patients for control of supraventricular tachycardia. Shortly after implantation in the first two patients, it was noted that the burst pacing sequence was not automatically activated by tachycardia when the pacemaker was in the DDD mode. Data from these two and the subsequent three patients were evaluated to explain this observation. The problem was primarily related to the operation of the device during the postventricular atrial refractory period. In all patients, the atrial electrogram encroached upon the programmed postventricular atrial refractory period because VA conduction during SVT was less than the lowest programmable interval (155 ms). Atrial events occurring during this interval will not trigger the tachycardia termination sequence. In all five patients, the size of the atrial electrogram decreased substantially (48 +/- 10%; mean +/- SD) during supraventricular tachycardia compared to sinus rhythm. In at least two of the five patients, decreased atrial size during supraventricular tachycardia may also have resulted in intermittent failure of atrial sensing during tachycardia, even at the most sensitive setting (0.6 mV). The latter may remain a problem even if the technical fault in SVT detection in the DDD mode were corrected. Two related problems were noted in the DDD mode: ventricular events during rapid SVT do not reset the low rate interval, resulting in random low rate pacing; and, automatic prolongation of atrial refractory period by two successive ventricular events without an intervening atrial sensed event compounds problems of atrial sensing. All of these problems were easily circumvented in all patients by noninvasive reprogramming to the DVI mode in which supraventricular tachycardia detection is based on ventricular sensing. These findings have implications for the future design of such devices.     

Observations on Induction and Termination of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia by External Pacing

Paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) can be reproducibly induced and terminated by critically timed atrial or ventricular depolarizations. In this study, noninvasive trans-cutaneous (external) cardiac pacing (NTCPJ was compared to endocardial ventricular pacing for the termination and induction of PSVT. In 24 patients, either atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia or AV reciprocating tachycardia was reproducibly terminated with either critically timed ventricular depolarizations or overdrive ventricular pacing from an endocardial right ventricular site. There were 32 trials of NTCP attempts to interrupt PSVT in the 24 patients. External pacing was successful at terminating PSVT in 23 patients and in 30 of 32 (94%) trials. In 20 patients, there were 26 trials of external pacing attempts to induce PSVT. External pacing initiated PSVT in 21 of 26 trials (81%). The pacing sequences used to induce and terminate PSVT with external pacing were copied from the endocardial sequences. The external pacing threshold averaged 77 ± 22 mA but the current needed to terminate PSVT was about 1.5 greater than threshold at 117 ± 27 mA. Serial external pacing studies were performed in seven patients. The thresholds for external pacing were similar from trial to trial as were the mode of termination and induction between the endocardial and external methods. External pacing can terminate most AV reciprocating tachycardias and many AV nodal reentrant tachycardias. It appears promising as a means of inducing PSVT. However, the high stimulation amplitudes needed will prohibit wide acceptance of external pacing for induction and termination of PSVT.     

Long-Term Therapy of Antitachycardia Pacing for Supraventricular Tachycardia

Long-term antitachycardia pacing therapy with the InterTach 262-12 and 262-16 was evaluated in 32 consecutive patients (mean age 50 +/- 13 years) with recurrent, drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia. AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was present in 20 patients, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in ten patients, and a reentrant tachycardia due to Mahaim fibers in one patient. During follow-up of 39 +/- 17 months, 250 persistent tachycardia episodes occurred in 22 patients. By adjusting detection and termination mode, recurrent supraventricular tachycardia could be controlled in 19 of 32 patients (60%) by antitachycardia pacing alone. Concomitant antiarrhythmic drug therapy was required in ten of 32 patients (30%). During follow-up antitachycardia pacing became ineffective in three patients (10%). Thus, chronic antitachycardia pacing proved to be safe and effective in selected patients with drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia and could significantly improve quality of life by rapid termination of recurrent supraventricular tachycardia episodes.     

室上性心动过速161例食管心房调搏资料分析

对161例SVT食管心房调搏资料的分析表明:1.预激综合征(包括隐匿性)是SVT最常见的原因,本组占50%(81/161);其次是房室结双径路,占43%(70/161)。2.食管心房调搏诱发SVT 112例(诱发率70%),其电生理机制以AVRT为第一位,占54%;AVNRT为第二位,占38%,证实国人SVT电生理机制情况与国外相比有不同的特点。3.用食管心房调搏可对SVT进行电生理分型,并作出无创性鉴别诊断。     

Neurohumoral and Hemodynamic Mechanisms of Diuresis During Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Thirty-two consecutive patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias, with previously defined mechanisms of the tachycardias, were interviewed by noninvestigators about whether they experienced symptoms of diuresis during or at the termination of the tachycardias, to test the hypothesis that patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia would have a feeling of diuresis, polyuria, or both during or at the termination of the tachycardia. Twelve of the 13 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (92%), two of the 15 patients with AV reentrant tachycardia (13%), and one of the 4 patients with atrial flutter associated with 2:1 AV conduction (25%) felt diuresis during or at the termination of the tachycardias (AV nodal reentrant tachycardia vs other forms of tachycardia; P < 0.001). In 14 of the 32 patients, the right atrial pressure and plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentration were measured during both the tachycardias and sinus rhythm. The mean right atrial pressure during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was significantly elevated compared to that during other forms of tachycardia (P < 0.01). The plasma ANP concentration during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was also elevated significantly compared to that during other forms of tachycardias (P < O.OO1). There were no significant differences in the cycle lengths of the tachycardias, age, left atrial dimensions, or the left ventricular ejection fraction between the AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and the other forms of tachycardia. We concluded that the feeling of diuresis during or at the termination of tachycardia was a more common symptom in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The higher secretion of plasma ANP from the right atrium might be involved in the mechanism of this symptom.     

Clinical Interest of a Sensor Driven Algorithm Limiting Ventricular Pacing Rate During Supraventricular Tachycardia in Dual Chamber Pacing

A sensor driven algorithm limiting ventricular pacing rate during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is included in a dual chamber rate modulated pacemaker sensitive to acceleration forces (Relay, 294-03, Intermedics Inc.). According to the intensity of concomitant exercise, the ventricular pacing rate is limited either to the programmed maximum pacing rate (MPR) or to an interim lower limit, called "conditional ventricular tracking limit" (CVTL). The MPR prevails over the CVTL when the sensor calculated pacing rate exceeds the minimal rate by more than 20 beats/mm. The purpose of the study is to determine the clinical safety and efficacy of this algorithm in patients with intermittent SVT. Method: a Relay was implanted in four patients with a bradycardia/tachycardia syndrome and in four patients with complete atrioventricular block (CAVB). All had episodes of paroxysmal atrial tachycardia. The units were programmed in DDDR: rate responsive parameters were adjusted by simulating the rate response during three levels of exercise to let the MPR override the CVTL only during strenuous exercise. Holter monitors and exercise testings were performed at 3-month follow-up. Results: in seven patients, Holter recordings showed Supraventricular arrhythmias at rest with a ventricular pacing rate limited to the CVTL. Appropriate rate increases during exercise testings were also demonstrated. Three devices had to be reprogrammed in DDIR tone patient suffering from nearly permanent atrial flutter and two patients not tolerating the CVTL pacing rate at rest). Conclusion: the CVTL algorithm is effective in protecting against high ventricular pacing rates during Supraventricular arrhythmias. It allows the selection of the DDDR mode even with a high MPR in patients with intermittent SVT.     

Implantable Pacers for Tachycardia Termination: Stimulation Techniques and Long-Term Efficacy

The long-term efficacy of pacing for termination o/supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) was reviewed. Increasingly complex and sophisticated antitachycardia pacing stimulation patterns have evolved, and are outlined. Although excellent results are reported with simple patterns, it may be that the more complex algorithms increase the percentage o/tachycardia patients who may be candidates for implantation of a device. In the papers reviewed, there were 460 patients, 268 with SVT, and 192 with VT. Results were judged to be good-excellent in 96.5% of both VT and SVT groups.     

Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker

MCCOMB, J.M., ET AL.: Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker. During a 3-year period, 22 patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia have been treated with antitachycardia pacemakers [Intermedics Intertach, 262–12, n = 17, and Intertach II, 262–16, n = 5). Eighty-two percent were female, the mean age was 44 ± 14 years; 86% had atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Symptoms had occurred over 11.8 ± 7.1 years, with 3.6 hospital admissions per patient, despite 4.7 ± 2.1 antiarrhythmic drugs. Following pacemaker implantation, during a follow-up of 14.8 ± 11.5 months, only two patients have been readmitted to a hospital because of supraventricular tachycardia (mean 0.1 per patient). One patient is taking an antiarrhythmic agent, and four are taking beta adrenergic blocking agents. Thus, 23% are taking cardioactive drugs (it was anticipated that two patients would continue on drugs after pacemaker implantation). There have been no serious complications. Atrial antitachycardia is thus an effective therapy in carefully selected patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia, reducing hospital admissions for supraventricular tachycardia and reducing the need for antiarrhythmic drugs.