认知行为治疗联合药物治疗与单纯药物治疗强迫障碍患者的随机对照研究北大核心CSCD

目的比较单用SSRIs与SSRIs合并认知行为治疗（cognitivebehavioraltherapy,CBT）强迫障碍患者的临床疗效。方法选取符合DSM—IV中强迫障碍诊断标准的门诊患者共80例,采用随机数字表法分为单用SSRIs治疗组f简称药物治疗组,n=40）和SSRIs合并CBT组（简称联合治疗组,n=401,分别于0、4、8、12、24、36、48周末采用Y—BOCS、HAMA等对患者进行盲法评定比较药物治疗和联合治疗的临床治疗效果,采用Logistic回归分析治疗效果的影响因素。结果4周末联合治疗组[（20．0±6．4）分与（23．6±6．0）分]及药物治疗组[（20．8±7．0）分与（23．7±6．3）分]Y．BOCS总分均低于基线（t=4．05,P=0．000;t=3．46,P=0．001）。2组患者Y—BOCS总分（F=3．986～7．104,P=0．009-0．049）和Y—BOCS强迫行为因子分（辟5．370～5．895,P=O．017～0．023）自8周末开始至48周末组问差异有统计学意义;2组患者Y—BOCS强迫思维因子分在48周末差异有统计学意义（F=5．523,P=0．021）。Logistic回归分析显示,联合CBT、Y-BOCS总分4周末治疗是否有效对患者48周末的疗效有正性预测作用（OR=8．61、9．25,均P〈0．05）。结论药物联合CBT能有效缓解强迫障碍患者症状,且优于单纯药物治疗,尤其对强迫行为的改善更为突出,且接受CBT、4周末起效的患者在后续的治疗中能获得更好地改善。     

抗抑郁药物联合短程团体认知行为疗法治疗强迫症临床观察

目的探讨抗抑郁药物联合短程团体认知行为疗法治疗强迫症的临床疗效。方法将201例强迫症患者采用随机数字表法分为研究组101例及对照组100例。治疗前后分别采用YaleBrown强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)及汤旦林生活质量量表评定两组患者的强迫症状及生活质量。结果治疗后两组Yale-Brown强迫症量表评分显著低于治疗前(P0.01),研究组显著低于对照组(P0.01);两组汤旦林生活质量量表评分显著高于治疗前(P0.01),研究组显著高于对照组(P0.01)。治疗后研究组汤旦林生活质量量表身体方面、心理方面、社会方面、尽职的能力、自我健康意识评分均显著高于对照组(P0.01)。结论抗抑郁药物联合短程认知行为团体治疗可有效改善强迫症患者的强迫症状,提高生活质量,值得推广应用。     

帕罗西汀联合认知行为疗法治疗青少年强迫症疗效分析

目的 研究帕罗西汀联合认知行为疗法对青少年强迫症的疗效.方法 对30例服用帕罗西汀效果不佳的青少年强迫症患者,采用帕罗西汀合并认知行为疗法治疗,应用Hamilton焦虑量表(HAMA)、Yole-Brown强迫量表(Y-BOCS)和临床疗效总评量表(CGI-SI)于治疗前及治疗第2、4、8周末进行测评.以Y-BOCS减...     

认知疗法治疗强迫症临床分析

本研究运用认知疗法结合药物与单纯药物治疗强迫症进行对照分析,报告如下。     

线上结构式团体认知行为治疗对轻症抑郁患者的有效性和可行性探索

目的探讨线上结构式团体认知行为治疗(internet-based structured group cognitive behavior therapy,I-GCBT)对轻症抑郁患者的有效性和可行性。方法使用SPSS20.0软件生成随机表,将96例轻症抑郁患者分配到线上视频团体干预组(线上组,n=64)与面对面干预组(线下组,n=32),使用HAMD17、HAMA、功能大体评定量表(Global Assessment of Functioning Scale,GAF)以及抑郁症状快速检查-自我报告评分16项(16 Items Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report,QIDS-SR16)分别在基线、4周末、8周末和12周末评估患者抑郁、焦虑及整体功能水平。采用重复测量方差分析比较两组治疗效果差异,采用卡方检验比较两组脱落率、治愈率、治疗接受度差异。结果(1)2组患者基线HAMA评分差异有统计学意义(t=-2.08,P=0.04),其他基线数据差异无统计学意义。(2)对患者在组别和时间的交互作用分析显示,HAMD17、HAMA和QIDS-SR16的时间与组别交互作用均不显著(F=0.69,P>0.05;F=0.95,P>0.05;F=0.64,P>0.05),GAF的时间与组别交互作用显著(F=4.09,P<0.01),2组患者在各量表上时间主效应均显著(HAMD17:F=32.81,P<0.01;HAMA:F=20.86,P<0.01;GAF:F=105.98;P<0.01;QIDS-SR16:F=25.27,P<0.01)。12周末临床治愈率达62%(43/69),线上组57%(25/44),线下组72%(18/25),差异无统计学意义(χ^2=1.57,P=0.21)。(3)治疗期间总体脱落率为26%(21/81),线上组29%(15/51),线下组20%(6/30),2组比较差异无统计学意义(χ^2=0.87,P=0.35),患者对方案的接受程度达97%(58/60),线上组97%(35/36),线下组96%(23/24),2组比较差异无统计学意义(χ^2=0.09,P=0.78)。结论线上结构式团体认知行为治疗对轻症抑郁患者的疗效与面对面干预组相当,患者依从性较好。     

正念认知疗法在强迫症治疗中的研究现状

强迫症是一组以强迫思维和强迫行为主要临床表现的心理障碍。正念认知疗法(MBCT)作为一种新兴的心理治疗方法,在强迫症的治疗中有着积极作用。本文通过对MBCT在强迫症治疗中的现状和效果进行综述,为强迫症的临床心理治疗提供参考。     

药物治疗与合并认知行为治疗对强迫症疗效的比较

目的探讨认知行为心理治疗(CBT)在强迫症(OCD)患者各亚型治疗中的有效性和规律性。方法本研究为临床对照研究。符合入组标准的强迫症患者按患者自愿原则分为两组,治疗观察3、6、12个月。疗效评定分别运用Yale-Brown强迫量表,自拟的自评好转程度量表和临床疗效评定。结果认知行为心理治疗合并药物治疗组31例,临床有效率70.9%,其中治愈率1.8%。单纯药物治疗组24例,临床有效率33.3%。Yale-Brown强迫量表和自评量表得分在6个月和12个月两组有显著差异(P<0.05)。其中强迫症亚型(怕脏型、反复检查型和反复担心型)的疗效比较,怕脏型在治疗3个月末两组间自评量表评分有显著性差异(P<0.05);反复担心型在治疗6个月末两组间Yale-Brown强迫量表总分有显著性差异(P<0.05);反复检查型两组间无统计学差异。结论认知行为心理治疗合并药物治疗强迫症的疗效明显优于单纯药物治疗。强迫症的亚型在治疗中的有效性次序为:反复担心型>怕脏型>反复检查型。     

团体认知行为治疗对强迫症患者认知功能的影响北大核心CSCD

目的探讨团体认知行为治疗对强迫症患者症状缓解和认知功能改善的效果。方法纳入符合DSM-IV-TR诊断标准的强迫症患者48例,按1:1的比率分入药物治疗联合团体认知行为治疗组(联合治疗组,n=24)和药物治疗组(n=24)。联合治疗组进行8周药物治疗及8次团体认知行为治疗,药物治疗组患者进行8周药物治疗。采用Y—BOCS评估治疗前后强迫症状,采用神经心理测试(包括连线测验、数字符号测验、数字广度测验、语义流畅性测验)评估治疗前后的认知功能。结果治疗前联合治疗组与药物治疗组Y—BOCS总分及神经心理测试结果差异均无统计学意义。治疗后联合治疗组Y—BOCS评分[(18.7±3.1)分与(20.7±1.8)分]显著低于药物治疗组(t=2.75,P<0.05);联合治疗组在连线测验中的B时间,数字符号测验,数字广度测验中的顺背、倒背以及语义流畅性测验中的正确数与药物治疗组比较差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.93,3.47,2.06,2.54,7.22,均P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论团体认知行为治疗能有效缓解强迫症患者的症状严重程度,改善强迫症患者的认知功能。     

强迫症的认知—行为理论和治疗研究

强迫症的认知—行为理论认为,功能失调性信念是强迫症产生和维持的关键因素。暴露和反应阻止法与认知干预相结合的认知—行为治疗,是目前强迫症治疗的主要方法。但有关认知—行为治疗的临床研究对认知—行为理论提出了质疑,认为功能失调性信念没有之前认为的那样重要和具有特异性。强迫症的认知功能研究认为,强迫症是由广泛存在的认知功能缺陷引起的。一些研究表明执行功能障碍可能是强迫症认知功能的主要问题。     

Predictors of response to group cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

PurposeTo identify the presence of factors associated with treatment outcome in patients under group cognitive-behavioral therapy (GCBT) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).Subjects and methodsThis study evaluated 181 patients with OCD that attended a 12-session weekly GCBT program. Response criteria were: ≥35% reduction in Y-BOCS scores and global improvement score of the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ≤ 2 at post-treatment evaluation. Sociodemographic data, OCD characteristics, and treatment data were studied.ResultsIn the bivariate analysis, the following variables showed statistical significance (p < 0.20) to enter the regression model: being woman (p = 0.074), greater insight (p = 0.017) and better quality of life (QOL) in all domains before treatment (p = 0.053), overall severity of disease according to the CGI (p = 0.007), number of associated comorbidities (p = 0.063), social phobia (p = 0.044), and dysthymia (p = 0.072). In the final regression model, these variables were associated with response to GCBT: female gender (p = 0.021); WHOQOL-BREF psychological domain (p = 0.011); insight (p = 0.042); and global improvement score of the CGI severity-scale before therapy (p = 0.045).ConclusionSpecial attention should be paid to patients with poor insight, increasing the cognitive aspects of the therapy in an attempt to modify the rigidity and fixity of their beliefs. In addition, male patients should be more observed, since they showed lower chance of response to GCBT when compared to women. Patients with more severe global symptoms (CGI) are poorer responders to GCBT, which indicates that not only obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) should be evaluated, since other symptoms, such as depression and anxiety, may affect the treatment; therefore, an attempt to reduce these symptoms, prior to the treatment of OCD, should be considered as an option in some cases.     

An open trial of group metacognitive therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Research supporting the metacognitive model of OCD (Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders and metacognitions: Innovative cognitive therapy. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons; Wells, A. (1997). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: A practice manual and conceptual guide. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons) is beginning to accumulate Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) aims to teach clients to shift to a ‘metacognitive mode’ and incorporates cognitive strategies and behavioural experiments, with the aim of modifying maladaptive metacognitive beliefs rather than the content of anxious beliefs themselves. The current paper reports on a preliminary study, applying MCT in a clinical group setting with eight adults suffering from a variety of OCD presentations. Promising results indicate a larger randomised controlled trial, with recovery achieved for seven of the eight participants on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale at 3-month follow-up. All participants demonstrated improvement on measures of OCD symptom severity and metacognitions.     

氟西汀合并认知行为疗法治疗强迫症的对照分析

目的　评价氟西汀合并认知行为疗法对强迫症的治疗效果。方法　将符合CCMD - 3诊断标准的 5 7例强迫症患者随机分为治疗组和对照组 ,治疗组给予氟西汀合并认知行为治疗 ,对照组只给予氟西汀治疗。应用临床疗效标准及耶鲁布朗强迫量表 (Y -BOCS)定期评定疗效。疗程 6个月。结果　在治疗第 1、2、4和 6个月末 ,治疗组疗效优于对照组 ,尤其是对强迫行为疗效更好 ,具有极显著性统计学意义 (P <0 0 1)。结论　氟西汀合并认知行为疗法治疗强迫症效果优于单独用氟西汀治疗。     

认知行为疗法治疗儿童青少年强迫症的脑影像学研究进展

50%的成人强迫症患者在童年或青少年期已出现强迫症的早期症状,及早干预可有效降低成人强迫症的患病率。认知行为疗法（cognitive behavioral therapy, CBT）是有效治疗儿童青少年强迫症的心理疗法之一,但目前其治疗机制尚未明确。近年来,脑影像学发展迅速,为探究CBT治疗的脑机制提供了重要的神经影像...     

氟西汀合并认知行为疗法治疗强迫症对照研究

目的：评价氟西汀合并认知行为疗法对强迫症的治疗效果。方法：将符合中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版的诊断标准的57例强迫症患者随机分为治疗组和对照组，治疗组给予氟西汀合并认知行为治疗，对照组单用氟西汀治疗，应用临床疗效标准及耶鲁布朗强迫量表(Y—BOCS)定期评定；观察6个月。结果：在治疗1、2、4个月和6个月时，治疗组疗效显著优于对照组，尤其是对强迫行为疗效更好。结论：氟西汀合并认知行为疗法联合治疗强迫症效果优于单用氟西汀治疗。     

A schema-focused approach to group psychotherapy for outpatients with borderline personality disorder: A randomized controlled trial

This study tests the effectiveness of adding an eight-month, thirty-session schema-focused therapy (SFT) group to treatment-as-usual (TAU) individual psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder (BPD). Patients (N = 32) were randomly assigned to SFT-TAU and TAU alone. Dropout was 0% SFT, 25% TAU. Significant reductions in BPD symptoms and global severity of psychiatric symptoms, and improved global functioning with large treatment effect sizes were found in the SFT-TAU group. At the end of treatment, 94% of SFT-TAU compared to 16% of TAU no longer met BPD diagnosis criteria (p < .001). This study supports group SFT as an effective treatment for BPD that leads to recovery and improved overall functioning.     

A randomized, controlled clinical trial of standard, group and brief cognitive-behavioral therapy for panic disorder with agoraphobia: A two-year follow-up

A randomized controlled clinical trial with a wait-list control group was conducted to examine the effectiveness of three modalities (brief, group, and standard) of cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for panic disorder with agoraphobia. A total of 100 participants meeting DSM-IV criteria were randomly assigned to each treatment condition: a 14-session standard CBT (n = 33), a 14-session group CBT (n = 35) and a 7-session brief CBT (n = 32). Participants received a self-study manual and were assigned weekly readings and exercises. The results indicate that regardless of the treatment condition, CBT for moderate to severe PDA is beneficial in medium and long term. To this effect, all three-treatment conditions significantly reduced the intensity of symptoms, increased participants’ quality of life, offered high effect sizes, superior maintenance of gains over time, and lower rates of relapse, compared to the wait-list control.     

Preliminary investigation of web-camera delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder

This study reports a waitlist controlled randomized trial of family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy delivered via web-camera (W-CBT) in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Thirty-one primarily Caucasian youth with OCD (range = 7-16 years; 19 male) were randomly assigned to W-CBT or a Waitlist control. Assessments were conducted immediately before and after treatment, and at 3-month follow-up (for W-CBT arm only). Primary outcomes included the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS), clinical global improvement rates, and remission status. When controlling for baseline group differences, W-CBT was superior to the Waitlist control on all primary outcome measures with large effect sizes (Cohen's d ≥ 1.36). Thirteen of 16 youth (81%) in the W-CBT arm were treatment responders, versus only 2/15 (13%) youth in the Waitlist arm. Similarly, 9/16 (56%) individuals in the W-CBT group met remission criteria, versus 2/15 (13%) individuals in the Waitlist control. Gains were generally maintained in a naturalistic 3-month follow-up for those randomized to W-CBT. This preliminary study suggests that W-CBT may be helpful in reducing obsessive-compulsive symptoms in youth with OCD. Given considerable access issues, such findings hold considerable promise for treatment dissemination.     

Dance movement therapy group intervention in stress treatment: A randomized controlled trial (RCT)

This randomized controlled trial compares the effect of a dance movement therapy (DMT) group intervention on stress management improvement and stress reduction with a wait-listed control group (WG). 162 self-selected clients suffering from stress were randomly assigned to a WG or a DMT intervention that received 10 group therapy sessions. Stress management [Stressverarbeitungsfragebogen/SVF 120], psychopathology and overall distress (Brief Symptom Inventory/BSI) were evaluated at baseline (t1: pre-test), immediately after completion of the ten sessions DMT group intervention (t2: post-test), and 6 months after the DMT treatment (t3: follow-up test). Analysis of variance was calculated to evaluate the between-group (time × condition) and within-group (time) effect of the DMT intervention. Negative stress management strategies decreased significantly in the short-term at t2 (p < .005) and long-term at t3 (p < .05), Positive Strategy Distraction improved significantly in the short-term (p < .10), as well as Relaxation (p < .10). Significant short-term improvements were observed in the BSI psychological distress scales Obsessive-Compulsive (p < .05), Interpersonal Sensitivity (p < .10), Depression (p < .05), Anxiety (p < .005), Phobic Anxiety (p < .01), Psychoticism (p < .05), and in Positive Symptom Distress (p < .02). Significant long-term improvement in psychological distress through DMT existed in Interpersonal Sensitivity (p < .05), Depression (p < .000), Phobic Anxiety (p < .05), Paranoid Thinking (p < .005), Psychoticism (p < .05), and Global Severity Index (p < .01). Results indicate that DMT group treatment is more effective to improve stress management and reduce psychological distress than non-treatment. DMT effects last over time.     

Internet versus face-to-face group cognitive-behavioral therapy for fibromyalgia: A randomized control trial

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy (iCBT) in treating fibromyalgia (FM) compared with an identical protocol using conventional group face-to-face CBT.MethodsSixty participants were assigned to either (a) the waiting list group, (b) the CBT group, or (c) the iCBT group. The groups were assessed at baseline, after 10 weeks of treatment, and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. The primary outcome measured was the impact of FM on daily functioning, as measured by the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). The secondary outcomes were psychological distress, depression, and cognitive variables, including self-efficacy, catastrophizing, and coping strategies.ResultsIn post-treatment, only the CBT group showed improvement in the primary outcome. The CBT and iCBT groups both demonstrated improvement in psychological distress, depression, catastrophizing, and utilizing relaxation as a coping strategy. The iCBT group showed an improvement in self-efficacy that was not obtained in the CBT group. CBT and iCBT were dissimilar in efficacy at follow-up. The iCBT group members improved their post-treatment scores at their 6- and 12-month follow-ups. At the 12-month follow-up, the iCBT group showed improvement over their primary outcome and catastrophizing post-treatment scores. A similar effect of CBT was expected, but the positive results observed at the post-treatment assessment were not maintained at follow-up.ConclusionsThe results suggest that some factors, such as self-efficacy or catastrophizing, could be enhanced by iCBT. Specific characteristics of iCBT may potentiate the social support needed to improve treatment adherence.