Lamivudine vs lamivudine and interferon combination treatment of HBeAg(-) chronic hepatitis B

To determine whether combination treatment of HBeAg(-) chronic hepatitis B is beneficial we studied 78 patients with HBeAg(-), HBV DNA-positive chronic hepatitis B who were randomized to lamivudine, 100 mg, qd, for 12 months or lamivudine-interferon (9 MU, t.i.w.) in combination. In the combination arm, 2 months of lamivudine treatment preceded 10 months of combination treatment. Biochemical, virologic and histologic responses were assessed at the end of treatment, after six and a median 27 months of drug-free follow-up (short- and long-term follow-up, respectively). Virologic response was defined as undetectable HBV DNA with a hybridization assay and biochemical response as normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Change in HBV DNA was also assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Presence of YMDD mutants at the end of treatment was investigated with a line probe assay. Both treatment regimes led to a median 2 log decline in HBV DNA levels. Virologic end of treatment responses were 90 and 92% with mono- and combination treatment, respectively. Corresponding virologic responses at short- and long-term follow-up were 59 and 54%, and 27 and 25%, respectively. Patients having a baseline HBV DNA value > or =200 pg/mL were more likely to relapse within 6 months off therapy than those patients with a baseline HBV DNA level <200 pg/mL (P = 0.041). YMDD mutants were observed in 53% of patients receiving lamivudine compared with 24% of patients receiving the combination regime (P = 0.017). In conclusion, efficacy of combination treatment is similar to lamivudine monotherapy. However, combination treatment decreases the development of YMDD mutant strains compared with lamivudine monotherapy.     

Pegylated interferons in chronic HBV: Alone or as combination therapy

Pegylated interferons have been investigated recently in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in both hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive, as well as HBeAg-negative, Asian and white patients. Pegylated interferon alfa-2a monotherapy has been compared in randomized studies with standard interferon, lamivudine, and with a combination of pegylated interferon and lamivudine. The results indicate the superiority of pegylated interferon alfa-2a over standard interferon and lamivudine and failure of combination therapy to further enhance antiviral efficacy. A trial with pegylated interferon alfa-2b in HBeAg-negative disease showed no benefit of combination therapy compared with pegylated interferon monotherapy, but there was no lamivudine monotherapy arm in the study. Pending final trial results and regulatory approval, pegylated interferons are likely to be recommended as the first-line therapy for chronic hepatitis B.     

A viral kinetic study using pegylated interferon alfa-2b and/or lamivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B/HBeAg negative

We studied viral dynamic parameters in 44 chronic hepatitis B/hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)(-) patients treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PEG-IFN) 100 or 200 microg weekly or lamivudine 100 mg daily or the combination of PEG-IFN 100 or 200 microg with lamivudine. Patients receiving PEG-IFN monotherapy exhibited viral load oscillations between weekly injections, which were resolved by the addition of lamivudine. The median pharmacological delay was estimated at 4.1, 5.8, and 1.8 hours in PEG-IFN monotherapy, PEG-IFN 100/200 microg + lamivudine, and lamivudine monotherapy, respectively (P = .44). The median half-life of free virus was 12.7 hours (range, 2.4-69.2 hours). The mean antiviral effectiveness of PEG-IFN 100/200 microg monotherapy was lower than that of lamivudine (82.6% vs. 96.4%; P = .005). The mean effectiveness of PEG-IFN 100 microg + lamivudine and PEG-IFN 200 microg + lamivudine was 92.8% and 94.4%, respectively. The half-life of infected cells ranged from 2.7 to 75 days. The median half-life of infected cells in patients receiving the combination regimens of PEG-IFN and lamivudine was similar to that of lamivudine patients (5.0 days vs. 6.0 days, P = .77). In conclusion, the addition of pegylated interferon alfa-2b in lamivudine treatment was found to neither enhance the potency of blocking HBV production nor the decay rates of infected cells. Supplementary material for this article can be found on the HEPATOLOGY website (http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-9139/suppmat/index.html).     

Three-phase sequential combined treatment with lamivudine and interferon in young patients with chronic hepatitis B

Alpha-interferon (IFN) or lamivudine monotherapy are ineffective in treating chronic HBeAg positive patients with high viral load and low alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. We investigated whether priming lamivudine treatment might enhance the antiviral and immunostimulant action of lamivudine/IFN combination in young tolerant patients. Eleven chronic HBeAg positive patients received: 100 mg/day lamivudine for 3 months followed by IFN 5 MU/m2/tiw with lamivudine 100 mg/day for 6 months and then lamivudine alone 100 mg/day for 9 months. Quantitative hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA was evaluated during treatment and core-promoter, precore and polymerase HBV mutants were detected by direct sequencing at the end of therapy. Serum HBV-DNA levels dropped during lamivudine monotherapy and in combination with IFN. After IFN withdrawal, viraemia transiently increased to high levels in five of 11 (45%) patients who showed rt M204V/I lamivudine mutant resistant. Two patients cleared HBeAg without anti-HBe seroconversion. One patient presented core-promoter (A1762T/G1764A) and precore stop codon mutations. Hence, three-phase sequential combined lamivudine/IFN treatment reduced HBV-DNA serum level, but did not lead to HBeAg and HBV-DNA clearance in these highly viraemic, normal ALT patients. Lamivudine/IFN combination did not prevent the emergence of YMDD lamivudine resistance. New schedules of antiviral treatments must be evaluated in this population at risk of disease progression.     

Combination therapy of thymosin alpha-1 and lamivudine for HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B: A prospective randomized, comparative pilot study

Background and Aim: Monotherapy of lamivudine, interferon‐alpha (IFN‐α), and thymosin alpha‐1 (Tα1) is unlikely to be sufficient for the eradication of a chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The aim of our study is to elucidate whether the combination of Tα1 and lamivudine is superior to lamivudine monotherapy in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B. Methods: Sixty‐seven patients were assigned to two different groups in a randomized manner. The combination group (n = 34) received Tα1 (1.6 mg subcutaneously, twice a week) and lamivudine (100 mg orally, daily) for 24 weeks, followed by continuous lamivudine therapy. The monotherapy group (n = 33) received lamivudine monotherapy continuously. Results: The incidence of HBeAg seroconversion at 24 weeks was 26.5% (9/34) in the combination group and 6.1% (2/33) in the monotherapy group (P = 0.024). However, there was no statistically significant difference between 26.5% (9/34) in the combination group and 12.1% (4/33) in the monotherapy group at 52 weeks (P = 0.138). The emergence of viral breakthrough gradually increased to 35.3% (12/34) in the combination group, and to 21.2% (7/33) in the monotherapy group at 52 weeks (P = 0.201). Conclusions: The combination treatment of Tα1 and lamivudine did not have an obvious benefit of virological and biochemical response as compared to the lamivudine monotherapy during the combination period. In addition, after the cessation of Tα1 treatment, the combination therapy did not prevent the occurrence of viral and biochemical breakthroughs.     

Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: To compare interferon monotherapy with its combination with lamivudine for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive hepatitis B treatment. METHODS: Two independent researchers identified pertinent randomized controlled trials. The trials were evaluated for methodological quality and heterogeneity. Rates of sustained virological and biochemical responses, and HBeAg clearance and seroconversion were used as primary efficacy measures. Quantitative meta-analyses were conducted to assess differences between groups for conventional and pegylated interferon, and overall. RESULTS: Greater sustained virological, biochemical and seroconversion rates were observed with addition of lamivudine to conventional [odds ratio (OR)=3.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (1.7-5.5), P<0.0001, OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.2-2.7), P=0.007 and OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.1-2.8), P=0.01 respectively], although not pegylated [OR=1.1, 95% CI (0.5-2.3), P=0.8, OR=1.0, 95% CI (0.7-1.3), P=0.94, and OR=0.9, 95% CI (0.6-1.2), P=0.34 respectively] interferon-alpha, with no significant affect on HBeAg clearance rates [OR=1.6, 95% CI (0.9-2.7), P=0.09, and OR=0.8, 95% CI (0.6-1.1), P=0.26 respectively]. Excluding virological response (P<0.001), pegylated interferon monotherapy and conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy were similarly efficacious (P>0.05), with the former studied in harder to treat patients, as evidenced by the superior virological response observed with conventional as compared with pegylated interferon monotherapy (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In comparable populations, pegylated interferon monotherapy is likely to be equally or more efficacious than conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy, thus constituting the treatment of choice, with no added benefit with lamivudine addition. However, when conventional interferon is used, its combination with lamivudine should be considered.     

Long-term follow-up of peginterferon and lamivudine combination treatment in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

We have previously demonstrated that combination peginterferon and lamivudine treatment has superior antiviral efficacy to lamivudine monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B. In this study, we investigated the long-term posttreatment virological response to this combination treatment. Sustained virological response of patients who completed 32-week peginterferon and 52-week lamivudine combination treatment was compared to patients who completed 52-week lamivudine monotherapy. Sustained response was defined as sustained hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss and HBV DNA < 100,000 copies/mL from treatment cessation until the end of follow-up. Forty-eight patients receiving combination treatment and 47 patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy were studied. The posttreatment follow-up of patients who received combination treatment was 117 +/- 34 weeks and that of patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy was 124 +/- 29 weeks. At the end of treatment, HBeAg loss occurred in 63% of patients in the combination group and 28% of patients in the lamivudine group (P = .001). The probabilities of sustained response for combination treatment and lamivudine monotherapy were 33% and 13% at week 24, 31% and 11% at week 52, and 29% and 9% at week 76, respectively (log-rank test, P = .0015). No patients developed virological relapse after week 76 until the last visit in either treatment group. All sustained responders had no biochemical relapse (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] > 2 times upper limit of normal) during follow-up. Among the non-sustained responders, biochemical relapse occurred in 32 patients (94%) in the combination group and 38 patients (88%) in the lamivudine group, respectively. In conclusion, combination treatment of peginterferon and lamivudine has a higher sustained virological response than lamivudine monotherapy up to 3 years after treatment.     

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B with the sequential administration of interferon and lamivudine

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Interferon monotherapy has been shown to induce a sustained viral response in 30-40% of patients with HbeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B infection. Similarly, lamivudine monotherapy causes HBeAg seroconversion in less than 20% of patients treated for one year. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of the sequential administration of interferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine to patients with chronic hepatitis B in comparison to lamivudine monotherapy. METHODOLOGY: Sixty-one patients with HbeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B infection and raised ALT were randomized to receive either interferon Alfa-2a, 4.5 million units daily for 16 weeks plus lamivudine 100 mg daily starting from week 5 and continuing for 48 weeks (Group A, n = 32) or lamivudine monotherapy for 48 weeks (Group B; n = 29). Patients were followed for 48 weeks after completion of therapy. RESULTS: HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HB +ve was observed in 2 (6.2%) patients in Group A. Both patients remained HBeAg negative and HBV-DNA negative throughout the follow-up phase. None of the group B patients seroconverted at the end of therapy or during follow-up (P = NS). All group A patients experienced at least one side effect and as a result, one dropped out. All group B patients completed the study without side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The sequential administration of interferon plus lamivudine was not superior to lamivudine monotherapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and was associated with more side effects.     

Lamivudine and alpha interferon combination treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND METHODS: Alpha interferon is the generally approved therapy for HBe antigen positive patients with chronic hepatitis B, but its efficacy is limited. Lamivudine is a new oral nucleoside analogue which potently inhibits hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA replication. To investigate the possibility of an additive effect of interferon-lamivudine combination therapy compared with interferon or lamivudine monotherapy, we conducted a randomised controlled trial in 230 predominantly Caucasian patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA positive chronic hepatitis B. Previously untreated patients were randomised to receive: combination therapy of lamivudine 100 mg daily with alpha interferon 10 million units three times weekly for 16 weeks after pretreatment with lamivudine for eight weeks (n=75); alpha interferon 10 million units three times weekly for 16 weeks (n=69); or lamivudine 100 mg daily for 52 weeks (n=82). The primary efficacy end point was the HBeAg seroconversion rate at week 52 (loss of HBeAg, development of antibodies to HBeAg and undetectable HBV DNA). RESULTS: The HBeAg seroconversion rate at week 52 was 29% for the combination therapy, 19% for interferon monotherapy, and 18% for lamivudine monotherapy (p=0.12 and p=0.10, respectively, for comparison of the combination therapy with interferon or lamivudine monotherapy). The HBeAg seroconversion rates at week 52 for the combination therapy and lamivudine monotherapy were significantly different in the per protocol analysis (36% (20/56) v 19% (13/70), respectively; p=0.02). The effect of combining lamivudine and interferon appeared to be most useful in patients with moderately elevated alanine aminotransferase levels at baseline. Adverse events with the combination therapy were similar to interferon monotherapy; patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy had significantly fewer adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: HBeAg seroconversion rates at one year were similar for lamivudine monotherapy (52 weeks) and standard alpha interferon therapy (16 weeks). The combination of lamivudine and interferon appeared to increase the HBeAg seroconversion rate, particularly in patients with moderately elevated baseline aminotransferase levels. The potential benefit of combining lamivudine and interferon should be investigated further in studies with different regimens of combination therapy.     

Interferon and lamivudine monotherapy on chronic hepatitis B in Japan

Aim:  We show data of interferon (IFN) and lamivudine monotherapy on chronic hepatitis B in Japan.
Methods:  Data collected from sixty-six chronic hepatitis B (CHB) Japanese patients who were treated with IFN for 6 months were analyzed. The efficacy of long-term IFN therapy in 52 patients with e-antigen positive CHB, and data from 290 chronically HBV-infected patients who were treated with lamivudine for more than 3 years, were analyzed.
Results:  Six-month IFN therapy: among 45 patients with HBeAg at commencement of IFN therapy, nine (20%) were responders. Young patients especially those with high serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were much more likely to respond to IFN therapy. Twelve-month IFN therapy: theresponse rate was 31% among 52 patients with HBeAg. Long-term lamivudine therapy: YMDD motif mutation was detected in 167 of 290 patients (58%) during lamivudine treatment. Breakthrough hepatitis from lamivudine resistant virus was detected in 93 of 290 patients (32%). Finally, 813 patients were treated by lamivudine between September 1995 and February 2006. Fifteen patients lost HBsAg during and after lamivudine therapy.
Conclusion:  Long-term interferon therapy has a better response than short-term interferon therapy. Some patients lost HBsAg during and after lamivudine therapy.     

A 1-year trial of telbivudine, lamivudine, and the combination in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A previous 4-week trial of telbivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B indicated marked antiviral effects with good tolerability, leading to the present 1-year phase 2b trial. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of telbivudine 400 or 600 mg/day and telbivudine 400 or 600 mg/day plus lamivudine 100 mg/day (Comb400 and Comb600) compared with lamivudine 100 mg/day in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive adults with compensated chronic hepatitis B. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 among the 5 groups. Median reductions in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels at week 52 (log(10) copies/mL) were as follows: lamivudine, 4.66; telbivudine 400 mg, 6.43; telbivudine 600 mg, 6.09; Comb400, 6.40; and Comb600, 6.05. At week 52, telbivudine monotherapy showed a significantly greater mean reduction in HBV DNA levels (6.01 vs 4.57 log(10) copies/mL; P < .05), clearance of polymerase chain reaction-detectable HBV DNA (61% vs 32%; P < .05), and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels (86% vs 63%; P < .05) compared with lamivudine monotherapy, with proportionally greater HBeAg seroconversion (31% vs 22%) and less viral breakthrough (4.5% vs 15.8%) (P = NS for both). Combination treatment was not better than telbivudine alone. All treatments were well tolerated. In exploratory scientific analyses, clinical efficacy at 1 year appeared related to reduction in HBV DNA levels in the first 6 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with telbivudine exhibited significantly greater virologic and biochemical responses compared with lamivudine. Results with the combination regimens were similar to those obtained with telbivudine alone. These data support the ongoing phase 3 evaluation of telbivudine for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B.     

Efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and lamivudine combination treatment in comparison to interferon alpha-2b alone in chronic delta hepatitis: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Delta hepatitis is characterized by rapidly progressive liver disease with adverse prognosis in most patients. Patients benefit from high doses and prolonged courses of interferon (IFN) therapy; however, lamivudine as a single agent has been disappointing. Data relating to the efficacy of IFN and lamivudine in combination is limited. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of IFN-alpha 2b and lamivudine combination treatment in comparison to IFN-alpha 2b alone in patients with chronic delta hepatitis. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with chronic delta hepatitis were randomized into two groups. Twelve patients received IFN-alpha 2b alone (eight men, four women; mean +/- SD age: 43.83 +/- 8.57 years), and 14 patients received IFN-alpha 2b plus lamivudine combination (seven men, seven women; mean +/- SD age: 42.5 +/- 11.02 years). The dose of IFN-alpha 2b was 10 MU t.i.w. and of lamivudine was 100 mg/day. The groups were comparable in reference to serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, albumin levels, histological activity and stage. Four patients (33.3%) in the IFN group and two (14.3%) in the combination group had cirrhosis (P = 0.2). The duration of treatment was 48 weeks with an untreated follow-up period of at least 96 weeks (mean +/- SD, 3.1 +/- 1.9 years). A liver biopsy was performed at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Eight patients from the IFN group and 11 from the combination group completed treatment. Serum ALT values became normal in 8/14 patients (57.1%) treated with IFN plus lamivudine and in 5/12 patients (41.7%) treated with IFN alone (P = 0.43). Serum hepatitis delta virus RNA was no longer detectable in nine of 14 (64.3%) patients treated with IFN plus lamivudine as compared to five of 12 (41.6%) patients treated with IFN alone (P = 0.024). In both groups female patients had significantly better virological response rate (P = 0.007). There was a significant improvement in histological activity in the combination group (mean decrease 5.27 +/- 1.08 score, P = 0.001), but not in the IFN group (mean decrease 1.44 +/- 1.59 score, P = 0.39). No significant improvement was observed in regards to fibrosis. Four of the 14 patients (28.6%) treated with combination therapy as compared to two of 12 patients treated with IFN (16.7%) were sustained virological responders (P = 0.47). The 5-year survival rate was 65% in the IFN group and 85% in the combination group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Interferon and lamivudine in combination is an encouraging treatment method and may be superior to IFN alone in chronic delta hepatitis.     

Efficacy of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or lamivudine combination with recombinant interferon in non-responders to interferon in hepatitis B virus-related chronic liver disease patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-response to interferon (IFN) monotherapy is a major therapeutic problem in the management of chronic hepatitis B infection. The efficacy of combination therapy to enhance the immunomodulatory effect of IFN by combining granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF) or decreasing viral load by adding an antiviral agent such as lamivudine was evaluated prospectively. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with chronic hepatitis B who were non-responders to previous IFN therapy were randomized to receive an IFN and GMCSF (group A, n = 10) or IFN and lamivudine (group B, n = 14) combination for 6 months. The end-of-treatment response was assessed by hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) determination. RESULTS: All patients successfully completed both the treatment schedules. The mean age, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, liver histology, HBV-DNA levels and distribution of HBV genotypes were comparable between the two groups. At the end of treatment there was a significant decrease in mean ALT levels. The HBV-DNA and HBeAg loss was seen in six of 10 (60%) patients in group A and in seven of 14 (50%) patients in group B. During a mean follow-up of 15 +/- 3 months, two of six (33%) patients in group A and three of seven (43%) patients in group B relapsed with HBV-DNA and HBeAg positivity, which meant an overall sustained response of 40% and 28%, respectively. None of the factors such as HBV viral load, ALT levels or liver histology could predict the non-response to combination therapy or occurrence of relapse. There was a trend in patients with genotype A compared with genotype D towards non-response to therapy, although the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of IFN plus GMCSF or lamivudine was effective in non-responders to IFN monotherapy. Larger studies using such combination therapies would be helpful in improving treatment strategies for chronic hepatitis B.     

Sequential combination therapy of HBe antigen-negative/virus-DNA-positive chronic hepatitis B with famciclovir or lamivudine and interferon-alpha-2a.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatitis B e antigen-negative/hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHBe-) exhibits a high relapse rate on monotherapy with lamivudine or interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha). We investigated, whether sequential therapy with famciclovir or lamivudine followed by combination with IFN-alpha-2a improves durable virologic response in CHBe- characterized by mutation analysis of the HBV precore genome region. METHODS: Fourteen patients were treated with famciclovir (n=3) or lamivudine for 4 weeks to reduce the viral load, and subsequently with the combination of the nucleoside analogue and IFN-alpha-2a until 16 weeks beyond the loss of serum HBV-DNA. RESULTS: Median duration of therapy was 29.0 weeks (range 20.6-48.3 weeks). Serum HBV-DNA was undetectable and alanine aminotransferase had normalized in all patients at the end of treatment. Seven (50%) patients maintained a sustained response 12 months after end of treatment. Only two of them had been infected by HBV with the G1896A mutation. Most patients (5/7) with the G1896A mutation relapsed within 4 months after therapy. CONCLUSION: Sequential combination therapy can induce sustained virologic response in a subgroup of CHBe-, but most with the G1896A precore mutant HBV relapse. Trials of CHBe- should be based on characterization of HBV mutants.     

Combination of tenofovir and lamivudine versus tenofovir after lamivudine failure for therapy of hepatitis B in HIV-coinfection

OBJECTIVE: At present sequential monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-polymerase inhibitors is clinical practice. It is unknown to date whether combination therapy with lamivudine plus tenofovir could be superior to sequential therapy with tenofovir after the occurrence of lamivudine resistance. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, 1: 2 matched pair analysis comparing patients with HBV/HIV-coinfection starting an antiretroviral regimen including tenofovir plus lamivudine with patients who had highly replicative, lamivudine resistant HBe-antigen positive chronic hepatitis B and started with tenofovir as the only active HBV polymerase inhibitor subsequent to lamivudine. RESULTS: At baseline patients on tenofovir plus lamivudine (n = 25) had a median HBV DNA of 5.9 x 10(7) copies/ml compared to 1.37 x 10(8) copies/ml in the tenofovir arm (n = 50; P = 0.32). A sustained undetectable HBV DNA < 1000 copies/ml was achieved in 19/25 (76%) patients on tenofovir plus lamivudine and in 42/50 (84%) on tenofovir (P = 0.53). A loss of HBe-antigen was observed in 9/25 (36%) patients on tenofovir plus lamivudine and in 12/50 (24%) patients on tenofovir (P = 0.29). HBs-antigen loss was found in 1/25 (4%) and 3/50 (6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of HBV/HIV-coinfected individuals, full HBV DNA suppression was achieved in the majority of patients independent of treatment allocation. Loss of HBe- and HBs-antigen was not different between the two study arms. Over a median treatment period of 116 weeks tenofovir was as effective as tenofovir plus lamivudine. Longer treatment periods may be needed to evaluate potential benefits of first-line combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B.     

Lamivudine treatment for hepatitis B reactivation in HBsAg carriers after organ transplantation: a 4-year experience

BACKGROUND: Reactivation of hepatitis B after organ transplantation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers may be fatal. In this study, we reported our experience of lamivudine treatment in HBsAg carriers who had post-transplant reactivation of hepatitis B. METHODS: The patients were 15 men and one woman. Nine received kidney transplants, six received heart transplants, and one received a lung transplant. They developed a reactivation of hepatitis B 1-101 months (median, 14 months) after transplantation. They received lamivudine 100 mg daily on a compassionate-use basis, and had regular follow ups. The median pretreatment total serum bilirubin level was 3.0 mg/dL, and the alanine aminotransferase level was 357 U/L. Four of the 16 patients were positive for HBeAg. The serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were > 3000 pg/mL in 13 (81%) patients. Three were coinfected with hepatitis C virus. RESULTS: The overall survival rate was 75%. All four fatal cases had a pretreatment total serum bilirubin level of > or = 3 mg/dL. Serum HBV-DNA soon became undetectable in 12 survivors. Of the 12 survivors, after a median treatment period of 101 weeks, a lamivudine-resistant strain with variation in the YMDD motif of the HBV polymerase gene developed in three (25%). None had significant adverse reactions to lamivudine treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that lamivudine is effective in the treatment of post-transplant hepatitis B reactivation, including patients with dual chronic hepatitis B and C. Early recognition of HBV reactivation and prompt lamivudine treatment are important to prevent mortality.     

Combination adefovir-lamivudine prevents emergence of adefovir resistance in lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The outcomes of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients treated with long-term adefovir dipivoxil have not been well described. This study aims to characterize the virological and biochemical response and to determine factors that may influence the development of resistance to adefovir. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B treated with adefovir for a minimum of 6 months at two tertiary referral centers. RESULTS: Data on 161 patients were analyzed. Seventy-two percent achieved an initial virological response with eventual normalization of alanine aminotransferase in only 67% of patients. Seventeen patients developed adefovir resistance with cumulative resistance rates of 3.2%, 8.8%, and 18% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Twelve (71%) of these patients had a biochemical breakthrough, with one death from fulminant hepatic failure. The median duration of lamivudine crossover was 1 month in adefovir-resistant patients, compared with 12 months for the remainder of the cohort (P < 0.01). Longer crossover therapy reduced the adefovir resistance rate, but did not eliminate it. No adefovir resistance is reported in those who were continued on long-term combination lamivudine-adefovir without a period of adefovir monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Combination lamivudine-adefovir therapy protected against the emergence of adefovir resistance.     

Comparison of entecavir and lamivudine in preventing hepatitis B reactivation in lymphoma patients during chemotherapy

During chemotherapy for lymphoma, the administration of cytotoxic agents and rituximab often results in hepatitis B reactivation (incidence, 14-72%). This study was designed to compare the efficacy of entecavir and lamivudine in preventing hepatitis B reactivation in lymphoma patients. Between January 2007 and February 2009, patients treated in four hospitals in China were screened to identify those most appropriate for analysis. These patients received either entecavir or lamivudine during chemotherapy and for 6 months after completion of chemotherapy. A total of 34 patients received entecavir and 89 patients received lamivudine. Compared with the lamivudine group, the entecavir group had significantly lower rates of hepatitis (5.9 vs 27.0%, P = 0.007), hepatitis B reactivation (0 vs 12.4%, P = 0.024) and disruption of chemotherapy (5.9 vs 20.2%, P = 0.042). All patients with hepatitis B reactivation had B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (stage III-IV). In lymphoma patients under chemotherapy treatment, entecavir is more effective than lamivudine in preventing hepatitis B reactivation. For patients with advanced stage disease, entecavir should be considered the primary preventive therapy.     

干扰素α-2b联合阿德福韦酯治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎近期疗效观察

目的探讨干扰素a-2b联合阿德福韦酯治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎的近期疗效及安全性。方法将HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者随机分为单药治疗组（40例）和联合治疗组（42例）,分别应用干扰素a-2b单药治疗或联合阿德福韦酯抗病毒治疗,疗程48周。结果在治疗结束时,联合治疗组ALT复常率为85．7％,HBVDNA阴转率为71．4％,HBeAg转阴率为61．9％,HBeAg血清学转换率为45．2％,均显著高于单药治疗组（分别为60．0％、45．0％、37．5％、25．0％,P〈0．05）;联合治疗组不良反应发生率与单药治疗组比无统计学差异（P〉0．05）。结论干扰素联合阿德福韦酯可提高慢性乙型肝炎抗病毒疗效且安全性良好。     

Adefovir plus lamivudine are more effective than adefovir alone in lamivudine-resistant HBeAg- chronic hepatitis B patients: A 4-year study

Background and Aim:  Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) is effective in lamivudine (LAM)-resistant hepatitis B e antigen-negative (HBeAg^-) chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, it is unclear whether LAM treatment should be continued in these patients. We aimed to compare the long-term efficacy of adding ADV to ongoing LAM treatment versus switching to ADV monotherapy in LAM-resistant HBeAg^- CHB.
Methods:  Sixty LAM-resistant patients with HBeAg^- CHB were randomly assigned (3:1) to combination therapy (10 mg ADV once daily plus ongoing LAM at 100 mg once daily [ n  = 45]) or 10 mg ADV monotherapy once daily ( n  = 15). Virological and biochemical responses were defined as hepatitis B virus (HBV)–DNA <400 copies/mL and as normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels, respectively.
Results:  The median follow-up time was 53 months (range 20–60 months). A virological response was observed in 38/45 (84.4%) and 11/15 (73.3%) patients in the ADV/LAM and ADV monotherapy groups, respectively ( P  = 0.56). Biochemical response rates were higher in the ADV/LAM group than in the ADV monotherapy group (90.9% vs 57.1%, respectively; P  = 0.01). In the ADV/LAM group, serum HBV–DNA remained undetectable in all patients who achieved a virological response ( n  = 38). In the ADV monotherapy group, virological breakthrough occurred in four of the 11 patients who achieved a virological response (36.4%; P  < 0.001 vs the ADV/LAM group, log–rank test). In addition, two patients in each group who did not achieve a virological response eventually developed ADV resistance.
Conclusions:  Adding ADV to LAM is more effective than switching to ADV monotherapy in LAM-resistant patients with HBeAg^- CHB.