Relationship between biliary and serum bile acids and response to ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

Objective: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) improves liver biochemistries and enriches the bile with UDCA in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether the degree of enrichment of bile correlated with that of serum and whether either of these measures correlated with improvement in measures of liver disease.
Methods: In a randomized study, biliary and serum bile acid analyses were performed at entry and after 2 yr of UDCA or placebo.
Results: The percentage of ursodeoxycholic acid in bile increased by 42% in the UDCA group ( n = 61 ) compared with 8% in the placebo group ( n = 57 ) ( p < 0.0001 ). Measurement of serum bile acids in 32 patients (18 ursodeoxycholic acid, 14 placebo) indicated that at 2 yr, ursodeoxycholic acid comprised 65% of serum bile acids in the treated group and 7% in the placebo group. Agreement between bile and serum was fair ( r = 0.75 , p ≤ 0.00002 ) because in some patients, plasma but not biliary bile acids were enriched with UDCA. Changes in biliary ursodeoxycholic acid correlated significantly but weakly with the changes in serum alkaline phosphatase, AST, bilirubin, and in Mayo risk score. Correlations between changes in serum bile acid composition and biochemical measures of disease activity were even weaker.
Conclusion: The measurement of biliary bile acids is superior to that of serum bile acids for assessing the compliance and changes in the circulating bile acids in patients receiving ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. Furthermore, measures to further increase the proportion of ursodeoxycholic acid in circulating bile acids should be explored.     

Value of serum determinations for prediction of increased ursodeoxycholic and chenodeoxycholic levels in bile

The correlation between biliary and serum levels of ursodeoxycholic and chenodeoxycholic acids was studied in a double-blind controlled manner in 39 patients before and during treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid, 800 mg/day; ursodeoxycholic acid, 400 mg/day; chenodeoxycholic acid, 750 mg/day; chenodeoxycholic acid, 375 mg/day; and placebo, respectively. On a total of 74 occasions, fasting duodenal bile and venous blood samples were obtained simultaneously. Biliary bile acid composition was determined by gas-liquid chromatography and serum ursodeoxycholic and chenodeoxycholic acid concentrations by radioimmunoassays. There was a much closer correlation between the biliary and serum levels of ursodeoxycholic acid (r = 0.8184, P less than 0.001) than between those of chenodeoxycholic acid (r = 0.4707, P less than 0.01). In contrast to serum chenodeoxycholic, which showed many overlaps between pre- and posttreatment values, serum ursodeoxycholic acid proved to be a very sensitive, specific, and convenient means of predicting the presence of increased levels of ursodeoxycholic acid in the enterohepatic cycle.     

Acute effects of ursodeoxycholic and chenodeoxycholic acid on the small intestinal absorption of bile acids

The effects of ursodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid on the small-intestinal absorption of endogenous bile acids were studied in patients with ileostomies who served as a model to investigate small-intestinal absorption in humans. In the control period, the eight patients excreted 327 +/- 91 (mean +/- standard error of the mean) mumol/8 h cholic acid and 214 +/- 38 mumol/8 h chenodeoxycholic acid by their ileal fluid. Following ursodeoxycholic acid administration (500 mg), ileal excretion of cholic acid increased to 517 +/- 96 mumol/8 h, and that of chenodeoxycholic acid increased to 337 +/- 42 mumol/8 h, indicating decreased absorption of these bile acids. Following chenodeoxycholic acid administration (500 mg), no significant increase of cholic acid excretion was observed, whereas chenodeoxycholic acid excretion increased as expected. It is concluded that following ursodeoxycholic acid administration the absorption of common bile acids from the small intestine decreases markedly. This effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on intestinal absorption of common bile acids probably is responsible for the decrease of their plasma concentrations, the reduction of their pool sizes, the increase of their fractional turnover rates, and most likely also contributes to the increased hepatic synthesis of cholic acid.     

Differing effects of ursodeoxycholic or chenodeoxycholic acid on biliary cholesterol saturation and bile acid metabolism in man

A dose-response study comparing ursodeoxycholic and chenodeoxycholic acid was carried out in six men with asymptomatic radiolucent gallstones present in well-visualizing gallbladders. The study tested the effects of a low (averaging 6 mg/kg/day) or medium dose (averaging 11 mg/kg/day) of each bile acid on the cholesterol saturation of bile as well as on bile acid metabolism, as inferred from biliary and fecal bile acid composition. Ursodeoxycholic acid, at low or medium doses, induced bile desaturation in most patients, whereas chenodeoxycholic acid did not. Despite the greater desaturation efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid, biliary bile acids became less enriched with the administered bile acid during ursodeoxycholic acid treatment than during chenodeoxycholic acid treatment. Both bile acids were nearly completely 7-dehydroxylated to lithocholic acid by colonic bacteria, but biliary lithocholic increased only slightly (and similarly) with each bile acid. Fecal bile acid composition suggested that administered ursodeoxycholic acid suppressed endogenous bile acid synthesis much less than chenodeoxycholic acid. The results indicate that ursodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid have similar but not identical effects on bile acid metabolism, but that for a given dose, ursodeoxycholic acid is a more potent desaturating agent than chenodeoxycholic acid. The results suggest that cholesterol gallstone dissolution with ursodeoxycholic acid should occur with a dose of 8–10 mg/kg in most nonobese patients.Supported in part by NIH grants AM 15887, 16770, and 21506.     

Toxicity of chenodeoxycholic acid in the rhesus monkey.

Chenodeoxycholic acid is an important drug for the treatment of cholesterol cholelithiasis in man. Although no toxicity has been demostrated in man, liver lesions develop in rhesus monkeys treated with chenodeoxycholic acid. To elucidate the mechanism of toxicity, chenodeoxycholic acid. To elucidate the mechanism of toxicity, chenodeoxycholic acid was fed daily to three groups of 6 animals each at the following dose: 10, 40, and 100 mg per kg; 2 separate animals were not treated and served as controls. After 1 month, the animals were killed. During the treatment period, most blood tests (e.g., blood count, blood urea nitrogen, albumin, SGOT, lactate dehydrogenase) remained within normal limits, but there was a significant dose-related increase in serum leucine aminopeptidase levels. The percentage of lithochlic acid, the 7-dehydroxylated bacterial metabolite of chenodeoxycholic acid, rose from 1% in the control animal to almost 14% in the 100 mg per kg-treated group. Liver biopsies obtained before treatment and at necropsy showed no significant changes. Thus, exposure of the liver to increased amounts of lithocholic acid during chenodeoxycholic acid treatment might result in elevation of serum leucine aminopeptidase activity.     

Immunosuppressive properties of chenodeoxycholic and ursodeoxycholic acids in the mouse.

Cell-mediated immunity is impaired during cholestasis, and there is evidence that bile acids play a role in this immune defect. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), which corrects the immunological abnormalities observed in primary biliary cirrhosis, could counter the detrimental effects of the endogenous bile acids. Accordingly, we assessed the respective effects of cholestasis, chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), and UDCA, using mixed lymphocyte culture as a model of allogeneic immune response. CDCA induced a dose-dependent inhibition of the proliferative response (0-150 mumol/L). Mononuclear cells obtained from bile duct-ligated mice had a normal immunostimulatory effect, whereas responder cells obtained from such animals showed a profoundly impaired proliferative response, suggesting that responder T cels are the main target of the cholestasis-induced immune defect. Supplementation of cultures with exogenous interleukins partially compensated for the inhibitory effect of 25 mumol/L CDCA, but not for that of 50 mumol/L CDCA, suggesting that impaired secretion of interleukins is not the only factor involved in the effect of bile acids. In contrast to CDCA, UDCA had no inhibitory effect on the allogenic immune response at concentrations of up to 50 mumol/L.     

Protective effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on chenodeoxycholic acid-induced liver injury in hamsters

AIM To investigate the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) on chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA)-induced liver injury in hamsters, and to elucidate a correlation between liver injury and bile acid profiles in the liver.METHODS Liver injury was induced in hamsters by administration of 0.5% (w/w) CDCA in their feed for 7 d.UDCA (50 mg/kg and 150 mg/kg) was administered for the last 3 d of the experiment.RESULTS At the end of the experiment, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased more than 10 times and the presence of liver injury was confirmed histologically. Marked increase in bile acids was observed in the liver. The amount of total bile acids increased approximately three-fold and was accompanied by the increase in hydrophobic bile acids, CDCA and lithocholic acid (LCA). UDCA (50 mg/kg and 150 mg/kg) improved liver histology, with a significant decrease (679.3 ±77.5 U/L vs 333.6 ± 50.4 U/L and 254.3 ± 35.5 U/L, respectively, P ＜ 0.01) in serum ALT level. UDCA decreased the concentrations of the hydrophobic bile acids, and as a result, a decrease in the total bile acid level in the liver was achieved.CONCLUSION The results show that UDCA improves oral CDCA-induced liver damage in hamsters. The protective effects of UDCA appear to result from a decrease in the concentration of hydrophobic bile acids, CDCA and LCA, which accumulate and show the cytotoxicity in the liver.     

Biliary bile acids in primary biliary cirrhosis: effect of ursodeoxycholic acid.

Bile acid composition in fasting duodenal bile was assessed at entry and at 2 years in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (10-12 mg/kg/d) taken as a single bedtime dose. Specimens were analyzed by a high-pressure liquid chromatography method that had been validated against gas chromatography. Percent composition in bile (mean +/- SD) for 98 patients at entry for cholic (CA), chenodeoxycholic (CDCA), deoxycholic (DCA), lithocholic (LCA), and ursodeoxycholic (UDCA) acids, respectively, were 57.4 +/- 18.6, 31.5 +/- 15.5, 8.0 +/- 9.3, 0.3 +/- 1.0, and 0.6 +/- 0.9. Values for CA were increased, whereas those for CDCA, DCA, LCA, and UDCA were decreased when compared with values in normal persons. Bile acid composition of the major bile acids did not change after 2 years on placebo medication. By contrast, in patients receiving UDCA for 2 years, bile became enriched with UDCA on average to 40.1%, and significant decreases were noted for CA (to 32.2%) and CDCA (to 19.5%). No change in percent composition was observed for DCA and LCA. Percent composition at entry and changes in composition after 2 years on UDCA were similar in patients with varying severity of PBC. In patients whose bile was not enriched in UDCA (entry and placebo-treated specimens), CA, CDCA, DCA, and the small amount of UDCA found in some of these specimens were conjugated to a greater extent with glycine (52%-64%) than with taurine (36%-48%). Treatment with UDCA caused the proportion of all endogenous bile acids conjugated with glycine to increase to 69% to 78%, while the proportion conjugated with taurine (22%-31%) fell (P <.05). Administered UDCA was also conjugated predominantly with glycine (87%).     

Use of serum bile acids in the identification of vinyl chloride hepatotoxicity

Most previous studies proposing serum bile acids as indicators of hepatic function have been performed in hospitalized patients in whom overt symptomatic liver disease was present. The ability of fasting levels of serum bile acids to identify mild, clinically inapparent chemical liver injury in an occupational setting was compared with that of indocyanine green clearance and routine biochemical liver tests in 67 asymptomatic chemical workers in whom liver biopsies had been performed for medical indications. Histologically, 15 were found to have chemical liver injury, 27 had nonchemical liver disease, and 25 were normal. Two serum bile acids, cholylglycine and conjugates of cholic acid, were determined by radioimmunoassay, using 466 "normal" males from the same worker cohort as a reference range. The geometric mean concentrations of cholylglycine in patients with chemical liver injury, patients with nonchemical liver disease, and normal subjects were 47.9, 19.1, and 20.0 micrograms/dl, respectively (p = 0.036 by analysis of variance). Conjugates of cholic acid showed similar differences (p = 0.027), as did indocyanine green clearance with mean half-life of 4.2, 3.2, and 3.3 minutes in the three biopsy subgroups, respectively (p = 0.043). Such differences were not observed for biochemical liver tests. The fasting level of serum bile acids provided high specificity but lower sensitivity in the detection of all types of liver disease. However, serum bile acids and indocyanine green clearance provided a higher specificity and sensitivity for chemical liver injury than for nonchemical liver disease. An index of average exposure to vinyl chloride was significantly greater in the subgroup with chemical liver injury than in the other two groups, further supporting the association of chemical type injury with impaired anion uptake. These data identify the fasting level of serum bile acids as a clinically usable indicator of early chemical injury in chemically exposed asymptomatic worker populations with liver dysfunction. Further investigation is needed in other occupational hepatotoxic environments to determine if this association is limited to vinyl monomer type injury.     

Metabolism of lithocholic and chenodeoxycholic acids in the squirrel monkey

Metabolism of lithocholic acid (LCA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) was studied in the squirrel monkey to clarify the mechanism of the lack of toxicity of CDCA in this animal. Radioactive LCA was administered to squirrel monkeys with biliary fistula. Most radioactivity was excreted in the bile in the form of unsulfated lithocholyltaurine. The squirrel monkey thus differs from humans and chimpanzees, which efficiently sulfate LCA, and is similar to the rhesus monkey and baboon in that LCA is poorly sulfated. When labeled CDCA was orally administered to squirrel monkeys, less than 20% of the dosed radioactivity was recovered as LCA and its further metabolites in feces over 3 days, indicating that bacterial metabolism of CDCA into LCA is strikingly less than in other animals and in humans. It therefore appears that LCA, known as a hepatotoxic secondary bile acid, is not accumulated in the squirrel monkey, not because of its rapid turnover through sulfation, but because of the low order of its production.     

Effect of chenodeoxycholic and ursodeoxycholic acids on isolated adult human hepatocytes

Chenodeoxycholic and ursodeoxycholic are effective cholelitholytic agents, but differ in their side effects. Chenodeoxycholic acid administration induces diarrhea and a transient rise of GOT, which are virtually nonexistent with ursodeoxycholic acid treatment. Lithocholic acid, a bacterial metabolite of chenodeoxycholic acid, has been implicated as a possible hepatotoxin. In the present investigation, the effect of chenodeoxycholic acid or ursodeoxycholic acid and their glycine and taurine conjugates on isolated human hypatocytes was directly assessed. Chenodeoxycholic acid had drastic effects on isolated human hepatocytes by reducing the number of microvilli and disrupting cell membranes. Pronounced release of GOT was observed. In contrast, ursodeoxycholic acid produced only slight morphological changes and enzyme release. Conjugation of each respective bile acids had a moderating effect.     

Speed of change in biliary lipids and bile acids with chenodeoxycholic acid--is intermittent therapy feasible?

To see whehter intermittent chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) therapy is a potential alternative to continous treatment for gallstone dissolution, the speed of change in bile lipid composition was studied after starting and stopping CDCA therapy. In addition, the relationship between bile lipid composition and the proportions of the bile acids was examined. Bile-rich duodenal fluid was collected twice in the first week and then at approximately weekly intervals for four to six weeks, from six gallstone patients starting 13-15 mg CDCA.kg BW-1 day-1 and from another group of six patients whose treatment was stopped after gallstone dissolution. After starting treatment, the mean biliary cholesterol saturation index (based on criteria of Hegardt and Dam, 1971) decreased from 1-49 +/- SEM 0-17 to 0-92 +/- 0-13 at three weeks and 0-88 +/- 0-10 at four weeks, by which time bile lipid composition had become relatively constant. In patients whose treatment was stopped, bile reverted to its supersaturated state within one week, changing from an on-treatment mean saturation index of 0-74 +/- 0-10 to 1-15 +/- 0-15 in six to eight days after withdrawing CDCA. The proportion of conjugated CDCA in the biliary bile acids increased from 27-9 +/- 2-5% to 60-5 +/- 4-2% within four days and to 80-7 +/- 6-2% by four weeks after starting CDCA. When treatment was stopped, the proportion of CDCA reverted to pretreatment levels by two to three weeks. The saturation index was significantly related (P less than 0-001) to the percent of conjugated CDCA present, such that when the proportion of CDCA exceeded 70%, bile was almost invariably unsaturated. Since the mean time taken for bile to become unsaturated was not shorter than the time taken for bile to revert to its supersaturated state, it seems that intermittent treatment would not be adequate to maintain an unsaturated bile and is, therefore, unlikely to be as effective as continuous treatment in dissolving gallstones.     

Gallstone dissolution treatment with a combination of chenodeoxycholic and ursodeoxycholic acids

Sixteen patients with radiolucent gallstones were treated with a combination of chenodeoxycholic and ursodeoxycholic acids for an average of 19 months. Liver tests remained normal in all patients. In nine of 15 patients (60%), in whom the gallbladder visualized during an oral cholecystogram, gallstones dissolved after one year, in eight of them, partially, and in the remaining one, completely. After two years, partial dissolution became complete in three patients, and partial dissolution occurred in 1 additional patient. Changes in lithogenic index and bile acid pool size were statistically not significant. Biliary content of chenodeoxycholic acid increased significantly from 25.7 +/- 3.53 to 45.2 +/- 3.31 (mean +/- SE)% and that of ursodeoxycholic acid from 2.6 +/- 0.52 to 34.6 +/- 2.45%. There were no discernible changes in serum triglycerides, total cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol. The findings suggest that the chenodeoxycholic-ursodeoxycholic acid combination provides a safe and efficacious treatment for some cholesterol gallstones.     

Competition in liver transport between chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid as a mechanism for ursodeoxycholic acid and its amidates'' protection of liver damage induced by chenodeoxycholic acid

BACKGROUND: Ursodeoxycholic acid has been widely used as a therapeutic agent in cholesterol gallstones and liver disease patients, but its mechanism of action is still under investigation. AIMS: The protective effect of ursodeoxycholic acid, both free, taurine and glycine conjugated, against hepatotoxic bile acids such as chenodeoxycholic acid and its taurine amidate was studied in bile fistula rats and compared with the cholic and taurocholic acid effect. METHODS: Tauroursodeoxycholic acid, glycine ursodeoxycholic acid, ursodeoxycholic acid, taurocholic acid and cholic acid were infused iv over 1 hour (8 micromol/min/kg) together with an equimolar dose of either taurochenodeoxycholic acid or chenodeoxycholc acid. Bile flow, total and individual bile acid and biliary lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase enzymes were measured. RESULTS: Taurochenodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholc acid caused cholestasis and liver damage associated with a decreased bile flow, total and individual bile acids secretion accompanied by a biliary leakage of lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase enzymes. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid, glycine ursodeoxycholic acid, ursodeoxycholic acid and taurocholic acid, on the contrary, were choleretic, inducing an opposite effect on biliary parameters. Simultaneous infusion of taurochenodeoxycholic acid and the protective bile acid resulted in a functional and morphological improvement of the above parameters in the following order: glycine ursodeoxycholic acid > tauroursodeoxycholic acid > ursodeoxycholic acid followed by taurocholic acid; cholic acid was ineffective. CONCLUSIONS: The results show the protective effect of glycine ursodeoxycholic acid, ursodeoxycholic acid and tauroursodeoxycholic acid. This may be due to a facilitated transport of the toxic bile acid into bile; conjugation with taurine is less effective than glycine. Finally, the better protective effect of ursodeoxycholic acid and its amidates with respect to cholic acid and its taurine conjugated form seems to be related to their different lipophilicity and micellar forming capacity.     

Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid on cholesterol and bile acid metabolism

Orally administered UDCA dramatically reduces the secretion of cholesterol into the bile. During UDCA therapy cholesterol balance is maintained by a reduction in both the relative and absolute absorption of cholesterol and, perhaps, by a combined moderate enhancement of bile acid synthesis and a suppression of cholesterol production. The percentage of UDCA in the bile is limited by the inability of UDCA to suppress bile acid synthesis from cholesterol and by the conversion of UDCA to CDCA by the intestinal bacteria.     

Comparative evaluation of chenodeoxycholic and ursodeoxycholic acids in obese patients. Effects on biliary lipid metabolism during weight maintenance and weight reduction

Obesity is a condition associated with an increased frequency of gallstone disease. This study attempted to evaluate the comparative effects of two gallstone-dissolving agents, chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid, on bile acid metabolism and biliary lipid secretion in obese subjects in order to identify the bile acid of choice in preventing and treating gallstone disease in obesity. Twenty obese subjects (greater than 120% ideal body wt) were randomly treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (10 mg.kg-1.day-1.1 mo-1) and then with chenodeoxycholic acid (15 mg.kg-1.day-1.1 mo-1) or with chenodeoxycholic acid first and then with ursodeoxycholic acid. Patients 1-10 were studied while eating an unrestricted weight-maintenance diet, whereas patients 11-20 were eating a 1080-kcal/d hypocaloric diet. Biliary lipid composition, cholesterol saturation index, and biliary bile acid pattern were evaluated in all subjects before and after each treatment period; in subjects 6-10 and 16-20, biliary lipid secretion rates and bile acid pool size were also evaluated. Both ursodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid decreased cholesterol outputs and cholesterol saturation index. However, during the weight-maintenance period the decrease induced by chenodeoxycholic acid was not significant. Biliary cholesterol outputs and cholesterol saturation index were always lower during ursodeoxycholic acid administration than during chenodeoxycholic acid therapy. Ursodeoxycholic acid levels during ursodeoxycholic acid administration and chenodeoxycholic acid levels during chenodeoxycholic acid administration increased in bile to 50% and 77%, respectively, of total bile acid levels. Bile acid pool size remained unchanged during chenodeoxycholic acid administration and was significantly reduced by ursodeoxycholic acid administration during the weight-reduction period. In conclusion, ursodeoxycholic acid in obese subjects seems more effective than chenodeoxycholic acid, at least during weight maintenance, in reducing cholesterol saturation of bile. This effect is related to a significant decrease of biliary cholesterol output.     

The lack of relationship between hepatotoxicity and lithocholic-acid sulfation in biliary bile acids during chenodiol therapy in the National Cooperative Gallstone Study

To test whether hepatotoxicity occurring in National Cooperative Gallstone Study patients was caused by a toxic effect of chenodiol per se or of lithocholate caused by defective sulfation, bile samples were analyzed using a new high-performance liquid chromatography method that measures the proportions of the four individual lithocholate amidates (sulfated and unsulfated lithocholylglycine and lithocholyltaurine) and all common bile acid amidates. Samples were obtained from National Cooperative Gallstone Study patients (n = 17) with abnormal light microscopic liver biopsy results or major aminotransferase elevations and from a matched control group of patients (n = 14) who received similar chenodiol doses but had no evidence of liver injury. Bile samples from 45 healthy subjects were also analyzed. The analytical method was validated by showing that the percentage of chenodiol and cholic and deoxycholic acid obtained by high-performance liquid chromatography correlated highly (r greater than 0.94) with previous gas-liquid chromatography analyses of these samples by the National Cooperative Gallstone Study Reference Laboratory. No significant differences were seen between gallstone patients with and without evidence of liver injury for percent total lithocholate amidates, percent sulfated or unsulfated lithocholate amidates or percent chenodiol amidates. Lithocholate was partially sulfated in all bile samples (52% +/- 17% [mean +/- S.D., n = 50]), but the extent of sulfation varied widely between and within patients during the course of therapy. Mean values of healthy subjects were similar and also showed a wide range in the extent of lithocholate sulfation. It is concluded that (a) liver injury caused by these doses of chenodiol could not be attributed to the accumulation of unsulfated lithocholate per se in circulating bile acids; (b) liver injury appeared to be, directly or indirectly, caused by enrichment in circulating bile acids with chenodiol or chenodiol together with lithocholate, suggesting that the hepatocytes of those patients with hepatotoxicity were injured by the change induced in bile-acid metabolism by the feeding of chenodiol; and (c) about half of lithocholate amidates in bile samples were sulfated, but the extent of sulfation was highly variable both in gallstone patients and healthy subjects.     

Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid and taurine on serum liver enzymes and bile acids in chronic hepatitis

Hydrophobic bile acids have been shown to be hepatotoxic, whereas treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid, a hydrophilic bile acid, has improved liver function indices in patients with chronic liver disease. Taurine administration has also been suggested to be useful for chronic hepatitis, taurine-conjugated bile acids being more hydrophilic than glycine-conjugated bile acids. To determine if taurine and ursodeoxycholic acid are beneficial and if their effects are additive, a double-blind, randomized trial was designed comparing the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid, taurine, and a combination of the two on indices of liver injury in 24 patients with chronic hepatitis. They were assigned at random to two of the four following treatments: ursodeoxycholic acid (600 mg/day), taurine (1.5 g/day), ursodeoxycholic acid plus taurine (600 mg + 1.5 g/day) or placebo, given in two successive cycles of 2 mo each, according to a balanced incomplete-block design. Ursodeoxycholic acid became the predominant biliary bile acid when administered alone or in combination with taurine, and taurine conjugate levels increased during taurine administration. Ursodeoxycholic acid reduced aspartate aminotransferase (35%), alanine aminotransferase (33%), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (41%), whereas taurine alone did not. The addition of taurine to ursodeoxycholic acid produced only minor changes in the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid alone. Results were confirmed by the administration of ursodeoxycholic acid, in a successive open phase of the study, to the entire patient population, which was large enough for different subsets of patients to be compared. Serum bile acids were measured at entry and during the open phase: primary bile acids did not change, whereas ursodeoxycholic acid levels increased from trace amounts to very high levels, especially in patients with more severe histological disease. It is concluded that ursodeoxycholic acid, but not taurine, improves enzymatic indices of liver injury in chronic hepatitis.