Diffusion-weighted imaging of soft tissue tumors: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differential diagnosis

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate soft tissue tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 88 histologically proven tumors (44 benign, 8 intermediate, 36 malignant) using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. Images of the tumors were obtained using a single-shot, spin-echo type echo-planar imaging sequence. The tumors were classified histologically as myxoid or nonmyxoid. We then compared the ADC values of the myxoid and nonmyxoid tumors; the benign and malignant myxoid tumors; and the benign, intermediate, and malignant nonmyxoid tumors. RESULTS: The mean ADC value of the myxoid tumors (2.08 +/- 0.51 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) was significantly greater than that of the nonmyxoid tumors (1.13 +/- 0.40 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean ADC values between benign myxoid tumors (2.10 +/- 0.50 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and malignant myxoid tumors (2.05 +/- 0.58 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s). The mean ADC value of benign nonmyxoid tumors (1.31 +/- 0.46 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) was significantly higher than that of malignant nonmyxoid tumors (0.94 +/- 0.25 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The ADC value might be useful for diagnosing the malignancy of nonmyxoid soft tissue tumors.     

Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging

PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two female subjects (mean age = 58 years, age range = 25-75 years) with histopathologically proven breast lesions underwent DWI of the breasts with a single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence using large b values. The computed mean apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the breast lesions and cell density were then correlated. RESULTS: The ADCs varied substantially between benign breast lesions ((1.57 +/- 0.23) x 10(-3) mm(2)/second) and malignant breast lesions ((0.97 +/- 0.20) x 10(-3) mm(2)/second). In addition, the mean ADCs of the breast lesions correlated well with tumor cellularity (P < 0.01, r = -0.542). CONCLUSION: The ADC would be an effective parameter in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions. Further, tumor cellularity has a significant influence on the ADCs obtained in both benign and malignant breast tumors.     

Soft-tissue tumors evaluated by line-scan diffusion-weighted imaging: influence of myxoid matrix on the apparent diffusion coefficient

PURPOSE: To compare the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of myxoid and nonmyxoid soft-tissue tumors using line-scan diffusion-weighted imaging (LSDWI), and to investigate the myxoid matrix influence on ADCs of soft-tissue tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study enrolled 44 patients with soft tissue tumors. They were divided into two groups: one with myxoid-containing soft-tissue tumors (N = 23) and the other with nonmyxoid soft-tissue tumors (N = 21). The 44 patients were also classified histologically into 26 with malignant soft-tissue tumors and 18 with benign soft-tissue tumors. LSDWI was performed using b values of 5 and 1000 second/mm(2). The ADCs of the tumors were calculated and compared for myxoid and nonmyxoid tumors and for benign and malignant tumors. RESULTS: The ADC (mean +/- SD) was 1.92 +/- 0.41 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second in myxoid containing tumors, whereas the ADC was 0.97 +/- 0.33 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second in nonmyxoid tumors. The ADCs of the myxoid and nonmyxoid tumors were significantly different (P < 0.01). The ADCs were 1.45 +/- 0.59 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second in malignant tumors and 1.50 +/- 0.64 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second in benign tumors. The ADCs of benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The ADCs of myxoid-containing soft-tissue tumors were significantly higher than those of nonmyxoid soft-tissue tumors. The myxoid matrix influences ADCs of both benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors.     

Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients

PURPOSE: To (a) evaluate liver diffusion isotropy, (b) compare two diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences for the characterization of focal hepatic lesions by using two or four b values, and (c) determine an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) threshold value to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients were examined with two single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR sequences. In the first sequence, liver diffusion isotropy was evaluated by using diffusion gradients in three directions with two b values. In the second sequence, a unidirectional diffusion gradient was used with four b values. ADCs were measured in 43 patients with 52 focal hepatic lesions more than 1 cm in diameter and in 23 patients with 14 normal and nine cirrhotic livers and were compared by using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Diffusion in the liver parenchyma was isotropic. ADCs of focal hepatic lesions were significantly different between sequences (P <.01). The mean (+/- SD) ADCs in the first sequence were 0.94 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.60 for metastases, 1.33 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.13 for HCCs, 1.75 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.46 for benign hepatocellular lesions, 2.95 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.67 for hemangiomas, and 3.63 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.56 for cysts. There was a significant difference between benign (2.45 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.96, isotropic value) and malignant (1.08 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.50) lesions (P <.01 for both sequences). CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging can help differentiate benign from malignant hepatic lesions. The use of two b values in one direction could be sufficient for the design of MR sequences in the liver.     

ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions and evaluating the detection accuracy of the cancer extension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used DWI to obtain images of 191 benign and malignant lesions (24 benign, 167 malignant) before surgical excision. The ADC values of the benign and malignant lesions were compared, as were the values of noninvasive ductal carcinoma (NIDC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We also evaluated the ADC map, which represents the distribution of ADC values, and compared it with the cancer extension. RESULTS: The mean ADC value of each type of lesion was as follows: malignant lesions, 1.22+/-0.31 x 10(-3) mm2/s; benign lesions, 1.67+/-0.54 x 10(-3) mm2/s; normal tissues, 2.09+/-0.27 x 10(-3) mm2/s. The mean ADC value of the malignant lesions was statistically lower than that of the benign lesions and normal breast tissues. The ADC value of IDC was statistically lower than that of NIDC. The sensitivity of the ADC value for malignant lesions with a threshold of less than 1.6 x 10(-3) mm2/s was 95% and the specificity was 46%. A full 75% of all malignant cases exhibited a near precise distribution of low ADC values on ADC maps to describe malignant lesions. The main causes of false negative and underestimation of cancer spread were susceptibility artifact because of bleeding and tumor structure. Major histologic types of false-positive lesions were intraductal papilloma and fibrocystic diseases. Fibrocystic diseases also resulted in overestimation of cancer extension. CONCLUSIONS: DWI has the potential in clinical appreciation to detect malignant breast tumors and support the evaluation of tumor extension. However, the benign proliferative change remains to be studied as it mimics the malignant phenomenon on the ADC map.     

Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) calculated from diffusion-weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance (MR) images can be used to characterize head and neck lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging was performed with a 1.5-T MR unit in 97 head and neck lesions in 97 patients. Images were obtained with a diffusion-weighted factor, factor b, of 0, 500, and 1,000 sec/mm(2), and an ADC map was constructed. The ADCs of lesions, cerebrospinal fluid, and spinal cord were calculated. RESULTS: Acceptable images for ADC measurement were obtained in 81 (84%) patients. The mean ADC of malignant lymphomas, (0.66 +/- 0.17[SD]) x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 13), was significantly smaller (P <.001) than that of carcinomas. The mean ADC of carcinomas, (1.13 +/- 0.43) x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 36), was significantly smaller (P =.002) than that of benign solid tumors. The mean ADC of benign solid tumors, (1.56 +/- 0.51) x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 22), was significantly smaller (P =.035) than that of benign cystic lesions, (2.05 +/- 0.62) x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (n = 10). No significant differences were seen in the mean ADC of cerebrospinal fluid and of spinal cord among four groups of lesions. When an ADC smaller than 1.22 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec was used for predicting malignancy, the highest accuracy of 86%, with 84% sensitivity and 91% specificity, was obtained. CONCLUSION: Measurement of ADCs may be used to characterize head and neck lesions.     

The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors.

OBJECTIVE: We wanted to evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for detecting breast tumors, as compared with the T1- and T2-weighted images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one female patients underwent breast MRI, and this included the T1-, T2-, DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced images. Sixty-five enhancing lesions were detected on the dynamic contrast-enhanced images and we used this as a reference image for detecting tumor. Fifty-six breast lesions were detected on DWI and the histological diagnoses were as follows: 43 invasive ductal carcinomas, one mucinous carcinoma, one mixed infiltrative and mucinous carcinoma, seven ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), and four benign tumors. First, we compared the detectability of breast lesions on DWI with that of the T1- and T2-weighted images. We then compared the ADCs of the malignant and benign breast lesions to the ADCs of the normal fibroglandular tissue. RESULTS: Fifty-six lesions were detected via DWI (detectability of 86.2%). The detectabilities of breast lesions on the T1- and T2-weighted imaging were 61.5% (40/65) and 75.4% (49/65), respectively. The mean ADCs of the invasive ductal carcinoma (0.89+/-0.18 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second) and DCIS (1.17+/-0.18 x 10(-3)mm(2)/ second) are significantly lower than those of the benign lesions (1.41+/-0.56 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second) and the normal fibroglandular tissue (1.51+/-0.29 x 10(-3)mm(2)/ second). CONCLUSION: DWI has a high sensitivity for detecting breast tumors, and especially for detecting malignant breast tumors. DWI was an effective imaging technique for detecting breast lesions, as compared to using the T1- and T2-weighted images.     

Evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging for the differential diagnosis of poorly contrast-enhanced and T2-prolonged bone masses: Initial experience

PURPOSE: To determine whether quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is useful for characterizing poorly contrast-enhanced and T2-prolonged bone masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 20 bone masses that showed high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and poor enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. These included eight solitary bone cysts, five fibrous dysplasias, and seven chondrosarcomas. To analyze diffusion changes we calculated the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for each lesion. RESULTS: The ADC values of the two types of benign lesions and chondrosarcomas were not significantly different. However, the mean ADC value of solitary bone cysts (mean +/-SD, 2.57 +/- 0.13 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second) was significantly higher than that of fibrous dysplasias and chondrosarcomas (2.0 +/- 0.21 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second and 2.29 +/- 0.14 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second, respectively, P < 0.05). None of the lesions with ADC values lower than 2.0 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second were chondrosarcomas. CONCLUSION: Although there was some overlapping in the ADC values of chondrosarcomas, solitary bone cyst, and fibrous dysplasia, quantitative DWI may aid in the differential diagnosis of poorly contrast-enhanced and T2-prolonged bone masses.     

Usefulness of the calculated apparent diffusion coefficient value in the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses

PURPOSE: To elucidate whether or not the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values calculated from echo-planar diffusion-weighted (EPDW) MR images are useful in the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 50 patients with known retroperitoneal masses, EPDW images were performed with b-factors of 0-1100 seconds/mm2. The final histologic diagnoses of these lesions were as follows: 12 malignant lymphomas, four other malignant mesenchymal neoplasms, 25 malignant epithelial neoplasms, seven benign mesenchymal neoplasms, and two nonneoplastic lesions. The ADC values obtained for the solid portion of the lesions were used to represent each lesion, and the values of the histologic groups were compared. RESULTS: The respective value of ADC for 12 malignant lymphomas, four other mesenchymal neoplasms, seven benign mesenchymal neoplasms, and two nonneoplastic lesions were as follows: 0.66 +/- 0.26, 1.26 +/- 0.50, 0.90 +/- 0.20, 1.87 +/- 0.48, 1.32 +/- 0.20 x 10(-3) mm2/second. The ADC value of the malignant lymphoma was significantly lower than that of the other malignant mesenchymal lesions, and was also lower than the ADC of the benign lesions. The ADC value of the malignant epithelial neoplasms was lower than that of the benign mesenchymal tumors. The ADC values of the malignant and benign lesions were 0.94 +/- 0.30 and 1.75 +/- 0.49 x 10(-3) mm2/second, respectively, which also demonstrated a significant difference. CONCLUSION: ADC values calculated from EPDW MR images may provide useful information in the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses.     

CT and radiography of bacterial respiratory infections in AIDS patients

OBJECTIVE: Acute vertebral collapse is common, and it is sometimes difficult to determine whether the cause is benign or malignant. Recently, diffusion-weighted imaging has been reported to be useful for differentiating the two types. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diffusion abnormalities quantitatively in benign and malignant compression fractures using line scan diffusion-weighted imaging. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Line scan diffusion-weighted imaging was prospectively performed in 17 patients with 20 acute vertebral compression fractures caused by osteoporosis or trauma, in 12 patients with 16 vertebral compression fractures caused by malignant tumors, and in 35 patients with 47 metastatic vertebrae without collapse. Images were obtained at b values of 5 and 1,000 sec/mm(2). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured in vertebral compression fractures and metastatic vertebrae without collapse. RESULTS: The ADC (mean +/- SD) was 1.21 +/- 0.17 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec in benign compression fractures, 0.92 +/- 0.20 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec in malignant compression fractures, and 0.83 +/- 0.17 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec in metastatic vertebral lesions without collapse. The ADC was significantly higher in benign compression fractures than in malignant compression fractures (p < 0.01), although the two types showed considerable overlap. CONCLUSION: Although the quantitative assessment of vertebral diffusion provides additional information concerning compressed vertebrae, the benign and malignant compression fracture ADC values overlap considerably. Therefore, even a quantitative vertebral diffusion assessment may not always permit a clear distinction between benign and malignant compression fractures.     

Diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging for liver disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to determine apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the abdominal organs and liver lesions, to determine the effect of the magnitude of b values on the ADCs, and to determine whether measured ADCs of liver tumors help differentiate benign from malignant lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Six healthy volunteers and 126 patients were examined with diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging using multiple b values (maximum, 846 sec/mm2). The ADCs of the liver, spleen, kidney, 49 malignant liver lesions (33 hepatocellular carcinomas, 15 metastatic liver tumors, and one cholangiocellular carcinoma), and 30 benign lesions (17 cysts, 12 hemangiomas, and one angiomyolipoma) were calculated. RESULTS: The ADCs of the abdominal organs and liver lesions showed smaller values when calculated with the greater maximum b values. The ADCs of the benign lesions calculated with all the b values of less than 850 sec/mm2 (2.49+/-1.39 x 10(-3) mm2/sec) were significantly (p = .0024) greater than those of the malignant lesions (1.01+/-0.38 x 10(-3) mm2/sec). When the maximum b value is 846 sec/mm2, use of a threshold ADC of 1.6 x 10(-3) mm2/sec would result in a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 80% for differentiation of malignant liver lesions from benign lesions. CONCLUSION. Measurement of ADC has good potential for characterizing liver lesions, but the calculated ADCs could be affected by the magnitude of the maximum b value.     

In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging

PURPOSE: To measure for the first time the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in anatomical regions of the prostate for normal and patient groups, and to investigate its use as a differentiating parameter between healthy and malignant tissue within the patient group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-shot diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging (DW-EPI) was used to measure the ADC in the prostate in normal (N = 7) and patient (N = 19) groups. The spin-echo images comprised 96 x 96 pixels (field of view of 16 cm, TR/TE = 4000/120 msec) with six b-factor values ranging from 64 to 786 seconds/mm(2). RESULTS: The ADC values averaged over all patients in non-cancerous and malignant peripheral zone (PZ) tissues were 1.82 +/- 0.53 x 10(-3) (mean +/- SD) and 1.38 +/- 0.52 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second, respectively (P = 0.00045, N = 17, paired t-test). The ADC values were found to be higher in the non-cancerous PZ (1.88 +/- 0.48 x 10(-3)) than in healthy or benign prostatic hyperplasia central gland (BPH-CG) region (1.62 +/- 0.41 x 10(-3)). For the normal group, the mean values were 1.91 +/- 0.46 x 10(-3) and 1.63 +/- 0.30 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second for the PZ and CG, respectively (P = 0.011, N = 7). Significant overlap exists between individual values among all tissue types. Furthermore, ADC values for the same tissue type showed no statistically significant difference between the two subject groups. CONCLUSION: ADC is quantified in the prostate using DW-EPI. Values are lower in cancerous than in healthy PZ in patients, and in BPH-CG than PZ in volunteers.     

磁共振扩散加权成像在乳腺良恶性病变中的诊断价值

目的探讨磁共振扩散加权成像在乳腺良恶性病变中的诊断价值。方法收集我院2010年2—8月经手术病理证实或穿刺活检证实的50例乳腺癌患者和50例乳腺良性病变患者。DWI扫描b值分别为400、600、8001、000 s/mm2,测量病灶区域的ADC值,并比较各组之间的差异。结果 b值分别为400、6008、001、000时乳腺癌及良性病变的ADC值,恶性组ADC值明显低于良性组(P<0.05)。四组不同b值的良恶性病变分别做ROC曲线,以b=1 000 s/mm2时,AUC最大,诊断价值最高,以ADC值为1.23×10-3mm2/s作为良恶性病变的诊断阈值,敏感性为90.0%,特异性为89.8%,准确性为89.9%。结论 DWI结合ADC值测量,对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断具有较高的临床应用价值。     

Apparent diffusion coefficient in malignant lymphoma and carcinoma involving cavernous sinus evaluated by line scan diffusion-weighted imaging

PURPOSE: To evaluate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of malignant lymphomas and carcinomas involving cavernous sinus by line scan diffusion-weighted imaging (LSDWI) and to determine the usefulness of this method for differentiating between the two tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients with malignant lymphomas and six patients with carcinomas were prospectively studied. LSDWI images were obtained with two different b values of 5 seconds/mm(2) and 1000 seconds/mm(2) in the coronal plane. The ADC values of the two types of tumors were calculated and compared. RESULTS: LSDWI provided diagnostic images with minimum susceptibility artifacts and enabled measurement of the ADC. The ADC value (mean +/- SD) was 0.51 +/- 0.06 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second in malignant lymphomas and 0.99 +/- 0.08 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second in carcinomas. A significant difference in ADC values was found between the two (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Malignant lymphomas showed significantly lower ADC value than carcinomas. ADC provides additional useful information about differentiation between these tumors.     

IVIM成像与DWI在乳腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断中的比较

目的 比较体素内不相干运动(IVIM)成像双指数模型、拉伸指数模型与扩散加权成像(DWI)单指数模型各参数在乳腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断中的价值.方法 回顾性分析257例经病理证实的乳腺病变患者(共276个病灶,包括197个恶性病变,79个良性病变).所有患者均行MRI常规检查及多b值DWI检查,获得传统DWI及IVIM各参数.比较各参数在正常乳腺组织、乳腺良性病变及恶性病变中的统计学差异,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定各参数诊断乳腺恶性病变的阈值以及曲线下面积(AUC)、诊断敏感性和特异性.结果 正常乳腺组织、乳腺良性病变及恶性病变的表观扩散系数(ADC)、慢速表观扩散系数(slow ADC)、快速表观扩散系数(fast ADC)、灌注分数(f)、扩散分布指数(DDC)及扩散异质性指数(α)值均有统计学差异(P<0.001).ADC、slow ADC、f、DDC和α的AUC分别为0.865、0.861、0.742、0.85和0.735;ADC、slow ADC、DDC和α的最佳诊断阈值分别为1.105×10-3 mm2/s,0.883×10-3 mm2/s,1.025×10-3 mm2/s和0.842,slow ADC敏感性最高(90.3%),DDC特异性最高(79.5%).双指数模型中slow ADC与fast ADC联合诊断的AUC为0.882;拉伸指数模型DDC与α联合诊断的AUC为0.853.结论 3种模型对于乳腺病变良恶性的鉴别都具有较高的价值,传统ADC的诊断准确性较高,slow ADC敏感性较高,DDC特异性较高.双指数模型中slow ADC与fast ADC联合诊断具有较高的价值.     

Comparison between malignant and benign abdominal lymph nodes on diffusion-weighted imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to review the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of benign and metastatic abdominal lymph nodes on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with a total of 40 benign (20 patients) and 16 malignant (8 patients) lymph nodes who underwent DWI MRI of the abdomen (b = 0.600) were enrolled in the study. ADC values of the lymph nodes were measured and comparison was made between benign and malignant groups. RESULTS: Mean ADC value of lymph nodes was 2.38 +/- 0.29 and 1.84 +/- 0.37 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec in the benign and malignant groups, respectively. There was a significant statistical difference between the ADC values of benign and malignant lymph nodes (P < .0005). CONCLUSION: A wide range of ADC values exist in patients with metastatic abdominal lymph nodes, with a tendency of higher ADC values in benign lymph nodes.     

高b值MR扩散加权成像在乳腺良恶性病变诊断中的应用价值

目的 评价高b值MR DWI及ADC值在乳腺良恶性病变诊断中的应用价值.方法 165例患者在行乳腺MR动态增强扫描前行不同b值(分别为500、1500 s/mm2)的DWI扫描,对171个怀疑或高度怀疑恶性病变者行回顾性分析.以正常乳腺组织为参考基准,选择增强图像中异常强化的高信号病变,同时在高b值(b= 1500 s/mm2)DWI中视觉判定是高信号的病变定义为恶性病变阳性结果,否则为良性病变阴性结果.对其中111个DWI视觉判定阳性结果的病变计算ADC值.依据全部病变穿刺活检病理诊断结果,应用Fisher精确检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验对比分析高b值DWI视觉评估中恶性和良性病变的阳性和阴性病灶数,以ADC值=1.13×10-3 mm2/s作为临界值,计算诊断的特异度和敏感度.结果 乳腺病变穿刺活检病理证实的171个乳腺病变中,91个恶性病变,80个良性病变.高b值DWI视觉评估,139个阳性结果中,恶性病变83个,良性病变56个;32个阴性结果中,良性病变24个,恶性病变8个(非肿块性导管原位癌),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).所有浸润性癌和肿块样导管原位癌(DCIS)在DWI视觉判定中为阳性,8例非肿块性DCIS判定为假阴性,总体的敏感度为91.2％ (83/91),特异性为30.0％ (24/80).110个肿块样病变和1个局灶性病变DWI视觉评估阳性结果的病变中,63个恶性病变平均ADC值为(0.73±0.24)×10-3 mm2/s,48个良性病变平均ADC值为(1.19±0.42)×10-3mm2/s,差异有统计学意义(Z=5.818,P＜0.01).以ADC值=1.13×10-3mm2/s作为临界值时,61个恶性病变为阳性结果,2个黏液癌为假阴性结果;27个良性病变为阴性结果,21个良性病变为假阳性,诊断敏感度是96.8％(61/63),特异度为56.2％ (27/48).结论 高b值DWI及ADC值对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断有一定的作用,但在诊断非肿块性乳腺病变时仍需慎重.     

弥散加权成像鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的价值初探

目的　探讨弥散加权成像（diffusionweightedimaging,DWI）的表面弥散系数（apparentdiffusioncoefficients,ADC）鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的价值。方法　健康志愿者10人,经手术病理证实的乳腺病变49例,其中恶性肿瘤26例,良性病变23例。DWI采用单次激发回波平面成像（echo-planarimaging,EPI）技术,14例取5个b值（b为扩散敏感度）,余者取2个b值,计算ADC值。以恶性肿瘤ADC值单侧上界95%容许区间为界限判断病灶的良恶性,诊断结果与动态增强比较。结果　除1例原位癌和1例小腺瘤外,DWI显示所有良恶性病变。恶性肿瘤组ADC值为(0.9608±0.2043)×10     

扩散敏感因子800时乳腺良恶性病变ADC界值的确定

目的：确定扩散敏感因子为800s/mm^2时乳腺良恶性病变的ADC界值,评价MR扩散加权成像（DWI）对乳腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断的价值。方法：回顾性分析经手术病理证实的70例（78个病灶）乳腺病变的DWI图像,其中良性病变26例（31个病灶）,恶性病变44例（47个病灶）。测量DWI图像上显示的病变表观扩散系数（ADC）值。通过ROC曲线确定ADC值的诊断阈值,并以此值进行鉴别诊断,同时计算ROC曲线下面积。结果：良恶性病变的ADC值均符合正态性分布,良恶性病变的ADC平均值分别为（1.46±0.26）×10^-3mm^2/s和（1.02±0.19）×10^-3mm^2/s,恶性病变的ADC值明显低于良性病变（P〈0.05）。约登指数最大法确定的ADC诊断阈值为1.28×10^-3mm^2/s,以此值进行鉴别诊断时的敏感度、特异度和诊断符合率分别为93.6%,75.9%,86.8%;阳性似然比最大法确定的ADC诊断阈值为1.035×103mm^2/s,以此值进行鉴别诊断时的敏感度、特异度和诊断符合率分别为46.8%,96.6%,65.8%;ROC曲线下面积为0.905（95%可信区间为0.836-0.975）。结论：扩散敏感因子为800s/mm^2时乳腺良恶性病变的ADC界值确定为1.28×10^-3mm^2/s,DWI的ADC值测定有助于乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断。     

Characterization of benign and metastatic vertebral compression fractures with quantitative diffusion MR imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conventional imaging techniques cannot be used to unambiguously and reliably differentiate malignant from benign vertebral compression fractures. Our hypothesis is that these malignant and benign vertebral lesions can be better distinguished on the basis of tissue apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs). The purpose of this study was to test this hypothesis by using a quantitative diffusion imaging technique. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with known cancer and suspected metastatic vertebral lesions underwent 1.5-T conventional T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging to identify the lesions. Diffusion-weighted images of the areas of interest were acquired by using a fast spin-echo diffusion pulse sequence with b values of 0-250 s/mm(2). The abnormal regions on the diffusion-weighted images were outlined by using the conventional images as guides, and the ADC values were calculated. On the basis of pathologic results and clinical findings, the cases were divided into two categories: benign compression fractures and metastatic lesions. The ADC values for each category were combined and plotted as histograms; this procedure was followed by statistical analysis. RESULTS: The patient group had 12 benign fractures and 15 metastases. The mean ADC values, as obtained from the histograms, were (1.9 +/- 0.3) x 10(-4) mm(2)/s and (3.2 +/- 0.5) x 10(-4) mm(2)/s for metastases and benign fractures, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that quantitative ADC mapping, instead of qualitative diffusion-weighted imaging, can provide valuable information in differentiating benign vertebral fractures from metastatic lesions.