Physicians at the medicine/psychiatric interface: what do internist/psychiatrists do?

Studies have convincingly demonstrated that some 50% of patients in primary care settings have both medical and psychiatric diagnoses requiring dual treatment. The concept of primary care psychiatry has emerged in recent years as one way to address this problem. In 1979 the first combined medicine-psychiatry residency was formed. There are now over 20 such programs, but there is little information on how these doubly trained physicians actually practice. In 1997, the authors surveyed the 268 physicians with board certification in both internal medicine and psychiatry that were listed with the American Board of Medical Specialties. Only 15% practiced any type of medicine at all; the rest were involved only in the practice of psychiatry. Although 75% identified themselves only as psychiatrists and worked predominantly in psychiatry, 95% reported using both their medical and psychiatric training in their professional work. They reported that the dual training made them better physicians, improved their professional credibility, and enhanced their diagnostic skills. Several significant barriers were discovered that directly affect the ability of physicians to practice in two fields. Findings, study limitations, and potential implications for the field and its patients are discussed.     

Psychiatric education in an era of rapidly occurring scientific advances.

Scientific advances in the fields of molecular biology, neurobiology, pharmacology, epidemiology, genetics, neuroimaging, and cognitive neuroscience are influencing psychiatric diagnosis and treatment, and this influence will grow substantially in the future. The current shortage of psychiatrists will increase over the next several decades, resulting in the need to train primary care physicians in basic psychiatric care and the use of non-physician mental health professionals to administer time-intensive, formal psychotherapies. The juxtaposition of these two trends-an increasing scientific influence on the clinical practice of psychiatry and fewer psychiatrists to deliver that treatment-is cause for changes in the approach to psychiatric education. In addressing these issues, the authors suggest that (1) psychiatry should be more integrated into undergraduate medical education in both basic science and clinical curricula, (2) residents in primary care disciplines should have more direct exposure to psychiatric training, (3) joint instructional experiences involving psychiatry and primary care residents should be encouraged, (4) psychiatry residency programs should maintain flexibility in order to incorporate rapid advances in diagnostic procedures and treatments into residency training, (5) research experience should be integrated into psychiatry residency programs, and (6) departments of psychiatry must develop the leadership and expertise necessary to implement the incorporation of rapidly advancing scientific discoveries into the psychiatric curriculum.     

Models of mental health training for primary care physicians

Of the 15% of the population with DSM III diagnosable disorders, 54% are seen exclusively by their primary care physician or by other health professionals. To understand how primary care physicians are prepared for this task the authors attempted to develop a taxonomy of mental health training programs for primary care physicians by: review of the literature, interviews with program sponsors, review of NIMH training grants, and site visits to teaching programs. From this process six program types were defined: consultation, liaison, bridge, hybrid, autonomous, and postgraduate specialization. The characteristics and emphasis of these model types are described as well as program needs for future training. Competence in psychosomatic medicine, psychophysiologic reactions, and the interactions of biologic, psychologic, and social factors in health and disease can be imparted to primary care physicians by such mental health training program designs.     

The irony of osteopathic medicine and primary care.

Osteopathic medicine is strongly identified with primary care. In the past 20 years, several factors have influenced this relationship, resulting in significant changes in the postdoctoral training of doctors of osteopathic medicine (DOs). Growth in colleges of osteopathic medicine spilled over into postdoctoral programs of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), creating a number of consequences. More than ever, osteopathic physicians are filling voids in ACGME primary care residency positions left vacant by U.S. medical graduates. Many allopathic primary care residencies have created parallel-accredited (American Osteopathic Association/ACGME) programs in hopes of tapping into this supply of DOs. In turn, osteopathic training institutions have shifted their educational emphasis in support of nonprimary care residencies. As a result of these changes, there is a strong element of irony in the underlying reasons for osteopathic medicine's link to primary care, why osteopathic training institutions are emphasizing specialty residencies, and the new responsibility of allopathic programs in training the next generation of primary care DOs.     

Should we train psychiatrists as primary care providers?

The author discusses the proposition that psychiatrists would be appropriate primary physicians for specific types of patients. The author reviews the arguments for and against psychiatrists as primary care providers, proposes questions that must be addressed in training for such a role, and describes current models of primary care education and practice for psychiatrists. The author believes that primary care may be an appropriate career track within psychiatry and suggests that the development of family medicine may provide useful guidance in incorporating primary care functions into psychiatry.     

New directions for nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the era of physician shortages.

During the past 35 years, the roles for nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) have evolved in parallel with the roles that physicians have come to play. Shifting needs in primary care and expanding opportunities in specialty medicine have been the dominant trends. Future directions will be influenced additionally by the deepening physician shortage. NPs are preparing for this future by developing doctoral-level training programs in comprehensive care, whereas PAs are adding training opportunities in specific specialties. Yet, neither discipline has expanded its training capacity to the degree that will be required, and, like physicians, neither will have a supply of practitioners that will match future demand. Coordinated planning to increase the educational infrastructure for physicians, NPs, and PAs is essential.     

Twenty-first-century primary care: new partnerships between nurses and doctors.

What role will advanced practice nurses (APNs) play in tomorrow's health care system? The author shares her answer to this question by first looking at the history of APNs and nurse practitioners (APNs whose focus is primary care), explaining what they do, and tracing their increasing success in overcoming long-standing barriers to full acceptance as providers of care. The author emphasizes that while APNs' advancement has usually been based on demonstrating sameness of practice processes and outcomes with those of physicians, in actuality, APNs-whose advanced primary care is delivered with full accountability and is indistinguishable from such care delivered by physicians-offer a different style of practice, which involves caring, nurturing, support, engagement with patients, attention to illness prevention and health promotion, and patient education. It is this difference on which APNs' survival rests. The author then discusses the educational training, economic, marketplace, and other questions that must be answered if APNs and physicians are to achieve a non-competitive, richer future, one in which both work together as partners rather than as members of a hierarchical team. Ultimately, such a future will be possible only when APNs have the same independence, access to patients, and voice in the treatment plan that physicians do.     

A manpower policy for primary health care.

A National Academy of Sciences study of policy options for the supply of primary health-care manpower has produced a comprehensive set of recommendations. The study finds an adequate overall supply of physicians, but a shortage of primary health-care practitioners. It recommends maintaining current enrollment levels in medical schools and training programs for nurse practitioners and physician assistants and increasing the proportion of primary-care residents. To enhance the availability of primary care, the report advocates reimbursement for all physicians within a state at the same payment level for the same primary-care service, a reduction in payment differentials between primary-care services and nonprimary-care services, and reimbursement for educational and preventive services and for new health-practitioner services. The report supports a team approach in primary-care training and recommends that all medical students obtain clinical experience in a primary-care setting and some instruction in epidemiology and behavioral and social sciences.     

Awareness level of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome during routine unstructured interviews of a standardized patient by primary care physicians

OBJECTIVE: To assess the awareness level of primary care physicians of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome during patient-physician encounters. DESIGN: A prospective study using a standardized patient approach, conducted between December 2001 and March 2002. Ten sleep experts reviewed and approved the checklist questionnaire. SETTING: Primary care clinics of Clalit Health Care Services, in the central region of Israel. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty physicians (100% compliance) randomly selected (matched by age, sex, board certification) from the 261 primary care givers in the region. INTERVENTION: A standardized patient incorporated into the physicians' daily practices. RESULTS: From the original checklist questionnaire, we identified 2 related question areas that at least 90% of sleep experts would pursue in light of the presenting scenario, "Do the patients snore, choke, or stop breathing in sleep?" and "Does the patient have sleepiness, unrefreshed sleep/fall asleep at undesirable times?" During the unstructured interview, only 10% of the physicians asked 3 or more questions. More than 85% of primary care physicians identified the need for polysomnography evaluation (27 physicians) or continuous positive airway pressure (26 physicians) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, only 16% and 50% discussed possible complications of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome such as motor vehicle and work accidents and cardiovascular events, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians cannot identify a common disorder associated with cardiovascular and neurobehavioral disease and could not identify the sleepiness as a source of dangerous driving. While understanding the algorithms for the diagnosis of sleep apnea, physicians cannot identify the patients for whom the diagnostics are needed. Education programs need to be developed to increase the level of suspicion of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome among practicing primary care physicians. Activities can be monitored and evaluated over time in the daily practice by standardized patients. EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVE: Increased awareness level of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome among primary care physicians, through publications and educational programs, monitored by standardized patients.     

Internal medicine-pediatrics physicians: their care of children versus care of adults.

Purpose To determine how practicing physicians who graduated from internal medicine-pediatrics residency programs allocate their practice time and professional activities between adult and child patients, and to investigate whether there are predictors of the extent to which a particular physician's practice is more or less focused on one or the other of these patient groups. Method In 2003, the authors mailed a questionnaire to the 1,300 generalists and 472 subspecialists who, as of 2003, had completed internal medicine-pediatrics training since the inception of the program in 1980. Results The response rate was 73% for the generalists and 65% for the subspecialists. The vast majority of the generalist physicians stated that they provide care to all ages of patients. However, the proportion of care they provided to different age groups was not uniformly distributed, with more care provided to adults than children. Both generalist and subspecialist respondents were more likely to feel better prepared by their residency training to care for adults than for children. Those who felt less well-prepared to care for children were less likely to do so in their practices (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.96). Fifty-four percent of the subspecialists pursued subspecialty training in internal medicine only, while 38% completed a combined internal medicine-pediatrics subspecialty program. These respondents, like the generalist respondents, also were more likely to focus clinical efforts on adults than children. Fewer than half (43%) provided any care to children zero to one year of age, while 54% provided at least some care to children aged two to 11 years. Conclusions Internal medicine-pediatrics physicians are more likely to spend a majority of their clinical care focused on adults and to perceive that they stay more current in the care of adults than of children. Potential reasons for this disparity may include training issues, greater reimbursement for the care of adults, perceptions of the impact on the medical market of the demographic shifts to older adults, and employment opportunities following training. These results also demonstrate the need for a more detailed and comprehensive assessment of the adequacy of pediatrics training in these programs.     

A blueprint for maternal and child health primary care physician education in medical genetics and genomic medicine: Recommendations of the United States Secretary for Health and Human Services Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children

Primary health care providers will play an increasingly important role in delivering genetics-related services for women and children along the reproductive continuum. However, most primary health care providers have received little training in genetics or medical genomics to incorporate such services into routine care. A workshop was convened by the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Health Resources and Services Administration to identify practical strategies to educate primary care physicians involved in maternal and child health. These included developing a targeted curriculum for residency training programs, incorporating assessments of genetics and genomic medicine into the initial board certification process and the process for maintenance of certification, providing continuing medical education opportunities at national meetings, establishing an Internet-based repository of recommendations for primary care providers, and forming a learning collaborative to link primary care providers and specialists to evaluate strategies to improve care. Workgroup members underscored the importance of assessing the impact of these interventions on the process and outcomes of health care delivery. The recommendations from this workshop were presented to the United States Secretary for Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children Subcommittee on Education and Training. The Subcommittee reviewed the report and put forth recommendations to the Committee, which were adopted by the Committee in September 2009.     

The crimson care collaborative: a student-faculty initiative to increase medical students' early exposure to primary care

The current shortage of primary care physicians (PCPs), particularly as more individuals obtain health insurance and seek primary care services, is a growing national concern. The Crimson Care Collaborative (CCC) is a joint student-faculty initiative in post-health-care-reform Massachusetts that was started with the explicit goal of attracting medical students to primary care careers. It fills a niche for student-run clinics, providing evening access to primary care services for patients without a PCP and urgent care services for patients of a Massachusetts General Hospital-affiliated internal medicine clinic, with the aim of decreasing emergency department use in both groups. Unlike other student-run clinics, CCC is integrated into the mainstream health care structure of an existing primary care clinic and, because of universal health insurance coverage in Massachusetts, can bill for its services. In addition to the clinical services offered, the student-run research team evaluates the quality of care and the patients' experiences at the clinic. This article describes the creation and development of CCC, including a brief overview of clinic operations, social services, research, laboratory services, student and patient education programs, and finance. In the wake of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, CCC is an example of how students can aid the transition to universal health care in the United States and how medical schools can expose students early in their training to primary care and clinic operations.     

Training primary care physicians in Chile in the diagnosis and treatment of depression

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the results of a brief 2-day educational training program for Chilean primary care physicians that measured changes in knowledge, attitudes and practice. This World Psychiatric Association (WPA) program was adopted to overcome diagnostic and treatment problems that are found among primary care practitioners. METHODS: 37 primary care physicians from two cities in Chile and 2589 patients participated. Physician's knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice were assessed 1 month prior and 1 month following the training program. In addition, the patients that visited the clinic during a typical week completed depression symptom self-ratings, including the Zung and a DSM-IV/ICD-10 major depression checklist at both times. RESULTS: The results suggested that, with this group of Chilean doctors, the WPA program was effective in improving knowledge about depression and in changing some disorder-related attitudes. In addition, it had some limited impact on actual clinical practice, although the rate of diagnosis remained stable and the post-training agreement between physician diagnosis and patient self-report remained low. The physicians seemed more confident in treating patients and demonstrated increased use of antidepressant agents. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of primary care physicians is a central component of any initiative to reduce the treatment gap and lag of depression, but their competence to play a crucial role remains limited. Further training of primary care physicians to improve the management of major depression continues to be needed.     

Bioethics principles, informed consent, and ethical care for special populations: curricular needs expressed by men and women physicians-in-training

OBJECTIVE: Physicians-in-training today are learning in an ethical environment that is unprecedented in its complexity. There is a call for new approaches in preparing medical students and residents for the ethical and professional issues they will encounter. The perspectives of physicians-in-training at different levels regarding the level of curricular attention needed for emerging bioethics concepts, practical informed consent considerations, and the care of special populations are unknown. METHOD: The authors performed a hypothesis-driven, confidential survey study to assess perceived needs and preferences among medical students and residents related to medical ethics education at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine. RESULTS: A total of 336 physicians-in-training volunteered (62% response rate). Overall, strong interest was expressed for increased curricular attention to the domains of bioethics principles, informed consent, and care of special populations. Women students expressed greater interest generally. For certain domains, clinical students expressed relatively less curricular need and psychiatry and primary care residents expressed relatively greater curricular need. Two of the four hypotheses were supported, a third received partial support, and a fourth was not supported by the findings. DISCUSSION: To be valuable and effective, new ethics curricular approaches must be responsive to the current complex ethical environment and attentive to the preferences of medical students and residents of both genders, at different stages of training, with different patient care responsibilities. This hypothesis-driven study provides guidance for the inclusion of novel and important ethics domains in training curricula across medical school and diverse residency programs.     

Perspective: Upcoming paradigm shifts for psychiatry in clinical care, research, and education

Psychiatry is facing a crisis fueled by a fragmented and inefficient system of care delivery and a disconnection between the state of research and the state of psychiatry education and practice. Many factors contribute to the current state of psychiatric care. Psychiatry is a shortage specialty, and this will become worse in the near future. In addition, financial pressures have led to decreases in psychiatric inpatient and outpatient services and to shorter lengths of hospitalization for even the sickest patients. This has resulted in fragmented care and an overreliance on polypharmacy. To reach the large number of patients needing psychiatric services, health care systems must change and take advantage of collaborative and integrative care models and new technologies. Psychiatrists must learn to partner more effectively with primary care providers to extend their expertise to the greatest number of patients. Currently, psychiatric diagnosis is based on a criteria-based system that was developed in the 1970s. Advances in systems and molecular neuroscience are beginning to elucidate specific brain systems that are dysfunctional in psychiatric illness. This has the potential to revolutionize psychiatric diagnosis and treatment in the future. However, psychiatry has not yet been successful in incorporating the language of this research into clinically meaningful terminology. If neuroscientific progress is to be translated into clinical advances, this must change. Residency programs must better prepare their graduates to keep up with a psychiatry literature that will increasingly use the language of neural circuits to describe psychiatric symptomatology and treatments.     

Future directions in consultation-liaison psychiatry

Consultation-liaison psychiatry in the United States has had to reassess its priorities with the change in health care economics in the 80 s. Liaison programs and educational programs for primary care staff are jeopardized. The emphasis has shifted from liaison to reimbursable consultation activities. Hospital stays are shorter with emphasis on outpatient and prepaid settings. Less expensive health care professionals are often asked to see patients previously evaluated by psychiatrists. This paper will discuss the need for focused cost-effective liaison services in this climate. Funding strategies for consultation-liaison programs, models of staffing consultation-liaison services, continuity of care from inpatient to outpatient services, integration of consultation-liaison psychiatrists in prepaid health care settings, primary-care educational programs, and psychosocial intervention programs for high-risk primary-care patients will be discussed.     

Program directors' perspectives on federally funded fellowship training in primary care research.

PURPOSE: To describe the organization, models of training, and institutional impact of National Research Service Award fellowship programs in primary care research. METHOD: Survey of 25 directors of currently-funded and former training sites. RESULTS: Twenty-four program directors (96%) completed the survey. Programs allocated 39% of fellows' time to course work leading to an advanced degree or other didactic instruction, and 40% of time to the conduct of research. Collaborations with other training programs within the institution occurred at 83% of sites. Programs commonly (54%) or exclusively (42%) relied on a research model of "early research independence" in which the fellow defined an area of research interest, rather than an "apprenticeship" model in which the fellow worked in a senior investigator's research area. These programs enriched the local academic environment, but required extensive financial subsidies. The high costs of training often had adverse impacts on recruitment and other components of the training process. CONCLUSION: Research training programs in primary care often substitute acquisition of advanced degrees for early immersion in research. The "early independence" model of research differs from fellowships in the medical specialties, and requires further study to assess its effectiveness. The need to subsidize training costs poses substantial problems for the institutions that host these fellowship programs.     

Mental health intervention programs in primary care: their scientific basis.

This study examines the scientific basis for mental health intervention programs in primary care. The validity of five underlying assumptions is evaluated, using the results of a naturalistic study covering a representative sample of 25 Dutch family practices and data from the literature. Our findings corroborate the validity of the assumptions. Firstly, our study indicates that mental disorders are indeed very prevalent in primary care settings. Secondly, we find that a substantial proportion of mental disorders is not recognized by the general practitioner (GP). Thirdly, our data show that mental disorders in primary care are not transient or self-limiting. Fourthly, it is shown that only half of the GP attenders with a mental disorder receive some form of mental health treatment in the 14 months after their index consultation. Finally, our data suggest that mental disorders, when identified, can be treated effectively in primary care. These findings are in general agreement with the literature. In the discussion we underscore the need for public health intervention programs targeted at primary care providers. Training programs for general physicians must be directed at improving recognition and diagnosis and at enhancing the availability and quality of mental health interventions. The effectiveness of these programs has to be tested in randomized trials.     

A comparison of smoking cessation efforts in African Americans by resident physicians in a traditional and primary care internal medicine residency

Tobacco use causes significant morbidity and mortality among African Americans. Physicians may inconsistently counsel patients against smoking. This retrospective chart review evaluated smoking cessation efforts in African Americans by internal medicine resident physicians in a traditional and a primary care residency program. One hundred twenty-nine African-American patients were evaluated by resident physicians in the traditional internal medicine residency. A tobacco use history was obtained in 84 patients. Twenty-eight patients smoked and two patients were counseled against smoking. Fifty-two African-American patients were evaluated by resident physicians in the primary care residency. A tobacco use history was obtained in 47 patients. Twenty patients smoked and 12 patients were counseled against smoking. There was a statistically significant difference in the rate at which smoking histories were obtained (p = 0.0011) and frequency of counseling against smoking (p < 0.0001). Gender analysis revealed that African-American women were less frequently asked about their smoking history (p = 0.0058) and counseled against smoking (p = 0.0016) by resident physicians in the traditional residency. African-American men received less counseling against smoking (p = 0.055) by resident physicians in the traditional residency. Resident physicians in the primary care residency program demonstrated greater smoking cessation efforts for African American patients. Smoking cessation should be emphasized in all internal medicine residency training programs.     

Health care reform: prospects and progress.

No longer can the health care community and the politicians work separately as they usually did until just a generation ago. Now, with or without the frustrations involved, both groups need one another and must work together to fulfill their common goal of caring for people. The U.S. economy can no longer sustain the immense and mounting costs of health care: the system must change drastically before the end of the century or there will be revolution or a collapse of the system. For the first time, there is a strong constituency calling for health care reform. The politicians and the health care community must stop ignoring that constituency and instead work together on a health care bill to head off the coming crisis. Such a bill will exact sacrifices and compromises from all sectors, and must control costs and provide universal access to health care. The author outlines proposed bills and other activities that are now being considered, describes a bill that he has helped craft and introduce, and notes that the Bush administration has done an about-face and is now promising a health care bill. He challenges academic medicine to help produce more primary care physicians, gives examples of efforts that are fostering primary care, especially in rural areas, and explains why having more primary care physicians is vital and also a key to cost containment. He ends by again urging the health care community to participate in defining what can be done to avert the coming crisis and establish a workable and equitable health care system.