Medical management of ischemic stuttering priapism: a contemporary review of the literature

Priapism is defined as a prolonged and persistent erection of the penis without sexual stimulation. This is a poorly understood disease process with little information on the pathophysiology of this erectile disorder. Complications from this disorder are devastating due to the irreversible erectile damage and resultant erectile dysfunction (ED). Stuttering priapism, though relatively rare, affects a high prevalence of men with sickle-cell disease (SCD) and presents a challenging problem with guidelines for treatment lacking or resulting in permanent ED. The mechanisms involved in the development of priapism in this cohort are poorly characterized; therefore, medical management of priapism represents a therapeutic challenge to urologists. Additional research is warranted, so we can effectively target treatments for these patients with prevention as the goal. This review gives an introduction to stuttering priapism and its clinical significance, specifically with regards to the patient with SCD. Additionally, the proposed mechanisms behind its pathophysiology and a summary of the current and future targets for medical management are discussed.     

阴茎假体植入术的临床应用与手术技巧(附光盘)

阴茎勃起功能障碍患者在接受药物及其他保守治疗后仍不能获得满意勃起时,阴茎假体植入术是理想的选择。阴茎假体植入后,无论患者本人还是其性伴侣都有很高的性生活满意度。近年来,国内接受阴茎假体植入术的患者越来越多。本文主要介绍阴茎假体植入术的临床应用与手术技巧。     

反复发作缺血性阴茎异常勃起(1例报告并文献复习)

目的探讨反复发作缺血性阴茎异常勃起的临床特点。方法分析复发性阴茎异常勃起1例,结合相关文献复习。结果反复发作夜间阴茎异常勃起16个月患者,临床检查确诊为复发性缺血性异常勃起,采用5a还原酶抑制剂保列治联合5羟色胺再摄取抑制剂左洛复治疗5d后,异常勃起未复发。继续服用保列治治疗,随访4个月异常勃起无复发,勃起功能正常。结论复发性缺血性阴茎异常勃起临床罕见,采用5a还原酶抑制剂联合5羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗具有一定的效果。     

高血流量阴茎异常勃起(5例报告及文献复习)

目的探讨高血流量阴茎异常勃起临床诊疗程序。方法5例阴茎异常勃起患者，经病史和体检，海绵体穿刺血气分析，彩色多普勒超声和超选择血管造影确诊为高血流量阴茎异常勃起，超选择阴部内动脉造影监视下动脉栓塞治疗，IIEF-5评分随访远期效果。结果4例有骑跨伤或会阴部钝性外伤史，血气分析结果接近动脉血。超声显示5例患者患侧海绵体动脉血流速度显著增加。超选择阴部内动脉造影4例患1者在阴部内动脉海绵体支末端形成动静脉瘘(2例左侧和2例右侧)；1例非外伤患者发现为海绵体血管瘤自发破裂。5例患者即时行明胶海绵动脉栓塞治疗，4例成功。1例失败患者改用微钢圈栓塞成功。随访结果无阴茎异常勃起复发，IIEF-5评分1例有中度勃起功能障碍。结论超选择性阴部内动脉栓塞是治疗高血流量阴茎异常勃起首选治疗方法。     

Effectiveness of the caverno-dorsal vein shunt (Barry shunt) on prolonged ischaemic priapism and its effect on the post-operative long-term erectile function

Ischaemic priapism is the most common form of priapism and requires urgent treatment. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the caverno-dorsal vein shunt on resolution of ischaemic priapism and on the post-operative long-term erectile function in patients presenting with priapism. The study included 10 patients admitted to our hospital for priapism between 2010 and 2018. The median age of the patients was 31 (24–66) years. The median priapism time was 13.5 (7–38) hours. The blood gas measurements were taken from the corpus cavernosum, and the drainage of the corpus cavernosum was performed as an emergency intervention. Then, the corpus cavernosum was irrigated with 0.01% adrenaline 5 times in 20-min intervals. The caverno-dorsal vein shunt procedure was performed in cases without regression of priapism. Two months after, the operation shunt was closed. Detumescence occurred in all patients. Eight of 10 patients maintained their erectile function. In 2 patients, severe erectile dysfunction occurred at post-operative 2 months following a priapism attack and penile prosthesis implantation was performed in these 2 patients. Our study showed that caverno-dorsal vein shunt procedure is effective in providing detumescence and maintaining potency in cases with ischaemic priapism. In our opinion, caverno-dorsal vein shunt can be considered as the first treatment of choice for refractory low-flow priapism.     

Management of end-stage erectile dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy by simultaneous dual implantation using a single trans-scrotal incision: surgical technique and outcomes

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and end-stage erectile dysfunction (ED) after radical prostatectomy (RP) can decrease a patient''s quality of life (QoL). We describe a surgical technique involving scrotal incision for simultaneous dual implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Patients with moderate to severe SUI (>3 pads per day) and end-stage ED following RP were selected for dual implantation. An upper transverse scrotal incision was made, followed by bulbar urethra dissection and AUS cuff placement. Through the same incision, the corpora cavernosa was exposed, and an IPP positioned. Followed by extraperitoneal reservoirs placement and pumps introduced in the scrotum. Short-term, intra- and post-operative complications; continence status and erectile function; and patient satisfaction and QoL were recorded. A total of 32 patients underwent dual implantation. Early AUS-related complications were: AUS reservoir migration and urethral erosion. One case of distal corporal extrusion occurred. No prosthetic infection was reported. Over 96% of patients were socially the continent (≤1 pad per day) and > 95% had sufficient erections for intercourse. Limitations of the study were the small number of patients, the lack of the control group using a perineal approach for AUS placement and only a 12 months follow-up. IPP and AUS dual implantation using a single scrotal incision technique is a safe and effective option in patients with SUI and ED after RP. Further studies on larger numbers of patients are warranted.     

Early insertion of inflatable prosthesis for intractable ischemic priapism: our experience and review of the literature

A cohort of 20 patients with delayed priapism who underwent treatment at the Emergency Department of our academic referral centers between January 2002 and April 2010 was studied. Of these, 16 cases suffered from a low-flow priapism. A total of 6 cases were managed non-surgically, 10 required shunt surgery, and of these 5 were treated by early penile prosthesis surgery. Prostheses were easily implanted in all patients with a mean operative time of 94 min. No intraoperative complications and no infection were registered. All patients with an inflatable prosthesis complained a reduction in penile sensibility that lasted 3 months. All patients were satisfied with the results of surgery (International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire-5, Q5 mean value 4), and all were successfully engaging in satisfactory sexual intercourses. No significant loss of penile length, neither apical erosion nor extrusion was recorded. Early insertion of a penile prosthesis is a simple and safe procedure in patients with ischemic priapism, which failed to respond to conservative management. Early insertion of a prosthesis helps to maintain adequate penile length, resolve priapism and, in the long term, it results in high satisfaction rates.     

Partial priapism secondary to tamsulosin: a case report and review of the literature

Partial priapism is also called partial segmental thrombosis of the corpus cavernosum. It is a rare pathology, and its aetiology, physiopathology and treatment are still not completely understood. To our knowledge, partial priapism due to alpha blockers has not been reported previously in the literature. In this study, a successfully treated case of partial priapism occurring after the usage of alpha blocker is presented and discussed in light of the related literature.     

Management of post-traumatic arterial priapism in children: Presentation of a case and review of the literature

In this article, a 9-year-old boy with arterial priapism is presented. The patient was managed with the conservative measures including imipramine hydrochloride and a favorable outcome was achieved after 2 months of follow-up. The pathophysiology, diagnostic tools and treatment alternatives are discussed.     

The effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors on penile rigidity variables during a period with no sexual stimulation: a laboratory setting double‐blind study

Study Type – Therapy (RCT)
Level of Evidence 1b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? There is a positive effect of PDE5 inhibitors on several aspects of the men’s sex lives, chiefly erectile function, personal self‐esteem, and satisfaction from their sex lives. To our knowledge, our study is the first study to evaluate the effects of PDE5 inhibitors on erectile variables simultaneously in a laboratory setting. In the present study, significant penile rigidities were obtained with PDE5 inhibitors in a short period, with no sexual stimulation, in laboratory conditions. Our findings might support the use of PDE5 inhibitors in the men who need penile rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors on erectile variables during a period with no sexual stimulation in a laboratory setting double‐blind study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 80 men without erectile dysfunction (ED) but with lifelong premature ejaculation (PE) were included in the study. The men were divided equally in to four groups and received either placebo, vardenafil (10 mg), sildenafil (50 mg) or tadalafil (20 mg) in a double‐blind study design. The men attended the laboratory following 3 days of sexual abstinence and placebo or one of the PDE5 inhibitors was ingested after ≥2 h of fasting and non‐smoking. The men were then immediately placed in a silent room and real‐time penile rigidity and tumescence monitoring with Rigiscan Plus (Rigiscan Plus® System, Osbon Medical Systems, Augusta, GA, USA) began. The men read some magazines or newspapers that contained no sexually stimulating material for 1.5 h. There was no interaction between the men and observer during the test period. Times to first measured and total durations of base and tip rigidities, and also total and per minute rigidity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The recorded base and/or tip rigidity ratios were 40% (eight of 20), 71% (12/17), 47% (nine of 19) and 70% (14/20) in men who took placebo, sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil, respectively (P= 0.126). The ratio of men who could obtain ≥60% base and/or tip rigidities were 10% (two of 20), 41% (seven of 17), 26% (five of 19) and 55% (11/20) in placebo, sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil groups, respectively (P < 0.05). The median time to first measured base rigidity was 58.0, 21.5, 54.5 and 57 min with placebo, sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil, respectively (P= 0032). The median total duration of recorded base rigidity was 4.0, 27.5, 10.0 and 11.5 min in men who took placebo, sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil, respectively (P= 0.013). The median total base rigidity (area under the curve) was 72.8, 699.0, 360.5 and 553.0 with placebo, sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil, respectively (P= 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant penile rigidities were obtained with PDE5 inhibitors during the short test period, with no sexual stimulation, in laboratory conditions. This finding might support the use of PDE5 inhibitors in men who need penile rehabilitation.     

Efficacy and safety of tadalafil in a Western European population of men with erectile dysfunction

Section Editor Michael G. Wyllie Panel of Advisors Ian Eardley, UK Jean Fourcroy, USA Sidney Glina, Brazil Julia Heiman, USA Chris McMahon, Australia Bob Millar, UK Alvaro Morales, Canada Michael Perelman, USA

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicentre trial, the safety and efficacy of on‐demand tadalafil (an oral phosphodiesterase type‐5 inhibitor approved in many countries for treating erectile dysfunction, ED) in a Western European population of men with mild‐to‐severe ED.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized according to baseline severity of ED in a ratio of 3 : 1 to receive either tadalafil 20 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoints were mean changes from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks) in the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and percentages of ‘Yes’ responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary Question 2 (‘Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?’) and Question 3 (‘Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?’). Secondary endpoints included mean changes from baseline to endpoint in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction and Overall Satisfaction domains, selected questions of the IIEF, and the percentage of ‘Yes’ responses to Global Assessment Questions (GAQ) at the last visit. Other analyses included the percentage of patients in each treatment group at endpoint with IIEF EF domain scores in the normal range (>26), the frequency of intercourse attempts and mean per‐patient intercourse success rate at various times after dosing.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 53 years and 80% had a history of ED of ≥ 1 year. The mean baseline EF domain score was 13.5, with 40.5% of patients in the severe category. Tadalafil improved mean EF domain scores by 11.1, vs 0.4 for placebo (P < 0.001). In addition, 73.9% of sexual intercourse attempts were successful (SEP‐Q3) in tadalafil‐treated patients, compared with 29.9% in placebo‐treated patients during the period after baseline (P < 0.001). Tadalafil significantly improved the mean IIEF intercourse satisfaction (5.1, tadalafil; 1.1, placebo) and overall satisfaction domain scores (3.9, tadalafil; 0.5, placebo), P < 0.001. GAQs used to assess the overall effect of the treatment indicated that tadalafil was superior to placebo (P < 0.001) in improving erections (82.1%, tadalafil; 23.1%, placebo) and sexual activity (78.6% and 17.3%). The most common treatment‐emergent adverse events more frequent (>2%) with tadalafil than placebo were headache, dyspepsia, flushing, back pain, pain in limb and myalgia. These adverse events were mostly mild to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Tadalafil improved erectile function and was well tolerated when taken by men from Western Europe with mild‐to‐severe ED.

     

Safety and efficacy of vardenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction: Result of a bridging study in Japan

AIM: Vardenafil is a selective and highly potent phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), with improved selectivity for PDE5 and demonstrated efficacy for improving sexual function in men with ED. The current study investigated the safety and efficacy of this new PDE5 inhibitor in Japanese men with ED. METHODS: This was a prospective, double blind, randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vardenafil. Following a 4-week treatment-free observation period, 283 eligible patients were randomized to 12 weeks treatment with vardenafil 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, or placebo. Primary efficacy responses were assessed using the scores of Q3 and Q4 of the international index of erectile function (IIEF). RESULTS: All three vardenafil doses showed significantly better improvement than the placebo group in Q3 and Q4 scores of the IIEF questionnaire, either at 12 weeks or at the 'last observation carried forward' (LOCF, P < 0.0001). Q3 scores were improved to 4.06 with vardenafil 5 mg, 4.53 with vardenafil 10 mg, and 4.64 with vardenafil 20 mg, versus 3.17 with placebo. Comparable scores for Q4 were 3.47, 4.15 and 4.31 versus 2.31 for placebo. Up to 86% of patients achieved improved erections as assessed by the global assessment question (GAQ). Reported adverse event rates were 35.3%, 45.3% and 54.5% with vardenafil 5 mg, 10 mg and 20 mg, respectively, versus 21.1% in the placebo group. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were transient headache, flushing and rhinitis, which were mostly mild. CONCLUSION: Vardenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED and provides improvement in key indices of erectile function among Japanese men with ED. The results of our trial show that up to nearly 90% of patients achieve improved erections with the administration of vardenafil.     

Sexual functions of men with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and hypogonadism may improve upon testosterone administration: a pilot study

This study examined 72 patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS), confirmed by polysomnography. Thirty-two patients were suffering from erectile dysfunction (ED) assessed by IIEF-5 questionnaires and confirmed by nocturnal penile tumescence examination. Their testosterone levels were measured. Eight patients had normal testosterone levels and were treated with a PDE-5 inhibitor (vardenafil) only; after 6 months of treatment, 6 of these patients (75%) showed significant improvement in erectile function. The remaining 24 patients with OSAS, ED and hypogonadism (total testosterone <12 nmol l⁻¹), were divided into two groups based on the indication for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy: five patients received CPAP therapy (group 1) and 19 patients did not (group 2). The patients of group 2 received only a PDE-5 inhibitor (vardenafil 20 mg) for ED; and eight patients (42%) showed an improvement after 3 months of treatment. The five patients receiving CPAP therapy were treated with a combination of parenteral testosterone undecanoate and a PDE-5 inhibitor (vardenafil) and all had normal erectile function after 3 months of therapy. The results suggest positive effects of addition of testosterone to treatment with PDE-5 inhibitors in hypogonadal men with OSAS, which should be confirmed in larger controlled studies.