Does Dual Chamber or Atrial Pacing Prevent Atrial Fibrillation? The Need for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Partially due to recent reports that cardiac antiarrhythmic therapy may have adverse effects on patient survival, clinicians have become more interested in the nonpharmacological prevention of atrial fibrillation. There is a large body of literature that suggests that the rate of development of atrial fibrillation in paced sick sinus syndrome patients is much lower in those patients who have received an atrial-based system, rather than a VVI system. However, all the published studies to date are retrospective, and fraught with potential bias favoring the AAI or DDD group. The authors strongly believe that the only way to determine if these suggestive but uncertain retrospective analyses are correct is to apply the same scientific rigor to this problem as has been applied to many other problems in cardiovascular medicine and perform a prospective randomized trial. A proposed trial design is discussed.     

Atrial Arrhythmias in Dual Chamber Pacing and Their Influence on Long-Term Mortality

A retrospective study of 252 patients who received a DDD pacemaker between October 1982 and December 1990 was performed. During a mean follow-up of 30 months, reprogramming to the VVI mode was necessary in 39 patients (15.5%). Technical problems causing downgrading occurred 15 times, of which 13 problems became permanent. A total number of 24 patients had sustained atrial arrhythmias, including 14 with atrial fibrillation and 10 with atrial flutter. In this group, conversion to sinus rhythm could be obtained in 38%. After 2 years, reliable DDD pacing was maintained in 86% of the surviving patients. The survival after 1 and 2 years was 94% and 89%, respectively, and was not influenced by arrhythmias or technical problems. We conclude that atrial arrhythmias including flutter are the most important reasons for reprogramming to the VVI mode, although in an important number of patients, predominantly those with flutter, restoration of AV synchrony can be obtained. The high number of patients with atrial flutter could imply some role for DDD devices offering the option of antitachycardia pacing. Reprogramming of the pacing mode did not influence mortality.     

Atrial Fibrillation During A-V Sequential Pacing

Atrial fibrillation resulted from competition between the P wave and a unipolar cathodal stimulus from the atrial output of an A-V sequential pacemaker Review of 31 patients with recently implanted A-V sequential pacemakers revealed that five, who had not had atrial fibrillation or flutter before implant, developed atrial arrhythmia early after implant As occasional placement of an atrial stimuJus in tlie atrial vulnerable period can occur during normal function, pacer induced atrial fibrillation must be expected Atrial sensing to ensure lack of competition between pacer and spontaneous atrial activity is desirable     

Efficacy of Ventricular Rate Stabilization by Right Ventricular Pacing During Atrial Fibrillation

To assess the effect of right ventricular pacing on rate regularity during exercise and daily life activities, 16 patients with sinoatrial disease and chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) were studied. Incremental ventricular pacing was commenced at 40 beats/min until > 95% of ventricular pacing were achieved during supine, sitting, and standing. Thirteen patients also underwent randomized paired submaximal exercise tests in either a fixed rate mode (VVI) or a ventricular rate stabilization (VRS) mode in which the pacingrate was set manually at 10 beats/min above the average AF rate duringthe last minute of each exercise stage. The pacing interval for rate regularization was shortest during standing (692 ± 26 ms) compared with either supine or sitting (757 ± 30 and 705 ± 26 ms, respectively, P < 0.05). During exercise, VRS pacing significantly increased the maximum rate (119 ± 5.2 vs 106 ± 4.2 ms, P < 0.05), percent of ventricular pacing (85%± 5% vs 23%± 7%, P < 0.05), rate regularity index (5.8%± 1.6% vs 13.4%± 1.9%, P < 0.05), and maximum level of oxygen consumption (12.4 ± 0.5 vs 11.3 ± 0.5 ml/kg, P < 0.05) compared with VVI pacing. There was no change in oxygen pulse or difference in symptom scores in this acute study between the two pacing modes. It is concluded that right ventricular pacing may significantly improve rate regularity and cardiopulmonary performance in patients with chronic AF. This may be incorporated in a pacing device for rate regularization of AF using an algorithm that is rate adaptive to postural and exercise stresses.     

Temporary Atrial Pacing in the Prevention of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Since its prevention with prophylactic drug therapy has limited success, alternative approaches are desirable. This study examined the efficacy of atrial or biatrial pacing, compared with no pacing, on the incidence of AF after isolated CABG.
Methods: From August 2002 to September 2004, 240 patients underwent CABG. After surgery, right and left atrial epicardial pacing wires were implanted for 72 hours of temporary pacing. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: no pacing (control group), right atrial (RA), and biatrial (BiA) pacing. Cardiac rhythm was monitored continuously during intensive care, or daily on the ward. The primary endpoints of this study were an episode of AF occurring up to 72 hours after CABG and the risk factors correlated with this event.
Results: Atrial and BiA pacing significantly lowered the incidence (1.25% vs 25%, P = 0.001) of AF episodes, and were both correlated (odd ratio 0.038; 95% confidence interval 0.005–0.29) with a decrease in rates of postoperative AF. Multivariable analysis identified older age (odd ratio 1.074; 95% confidence interval 1.024–1.12) and no pacing as independent risk factors of postoperative AF.
Conclusions: Temporary right atrial or biatrial pacing after CABG significantly decreased the postoperative incidence of AF. Multivariable analysis identified older age and no pacing as predictors of AF occurrence .     

Atrial Capture and Dual Chamber Pacing

During dual chamber pacing it is sometimes impossible to assess atrial capture even on the 12-lead ECG. We developed a strategy to identify atrial capture when it is not possible to do so by ECG, and when the ECG shows no evidence of spontaneous or paced atrial activity.     

Initial Experience with a New Balloon-Guided Single Lead Catheter for Internal Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation and Dual Chamber Pacing

Background: Based on the observation that internal cardioversion (IntCV) of atrial fibrillation is effective with electrodes in the right atrium and pulmonary artery, a new balloon-guided catheter and external defibrillation device with optional dual chamber pacing was evaluated. Methods: IntCV was attempted in 27 patients (age: 57 ± 10 years, duration: 14 ± 18 months, left atrial diameter 56 ± 8 mm) using a new defibrillation device (Alert, EP MedSystems, Inc., NJ, USA) that allows the delivery of biphasic shocks (0.5–15 J, variable tilt), atrial and ventricular pacing, and online signal recording. Pacing and defibrillation shocks were applied via a 7.5 Fr balloon-guided catheter (EP MedSystems, Inc.). Pacing, sensing, and triggering were established through the proximal atrial array and an electrode ring between both defibrillation arrays and a single ventricular electrode ring. Catheters were inserted from the antecubital vein. Results: In 25 of 27 patients sinus rhythm was restored with a mean energy of 6.7 ± 4.5 J. In five patients, atrial postshock pacing was required for bradycardia and atrial premature beats. The mean fluoroscopy time was 2.0 ± 1.3 minutes. Conclusion: The high success rate, ease of application, and backup dual chamber pacing suggest that this system is an alternative to established methods of cardioversion. In certain indications, such as failure of prior external cardioversion and situations in which a standard pulmonary balloon catheter is needed, this system would be advantageous.     

Mode Switch Despite Undersensing of Atrial Fibrillation in ODD Pacing

Mode switching algorithms are commonly used to protect the ventricles against high rates induced by atrial tachycardia. In the case of atrial fibrillation (AF), the response of these algorithms depends on the quality of atrial sensing. The Chorum 7234 DDDR pacemaker uses a new mode switching algorithm, based on a statistical analysis of the atrial rhythm. It includes two criteria of diagnosis: "high" if more than 28 of 32 cycles are abnormally accelerated; and "low" if more than 36 of 64 cycles are abnormally accelerated. Methods: From a taped database of electrophysiological studies, episodes of AF lasting more than 2 minutes were selected. A tape recorder replayed the atrial signals into an external Chorum device. Each episode was replayed eight times with a programmed atrial sensitivity increasing from 0.4 –2.0 mV. For each criterion of diagnosis and each programmed sensitivity, the percentage of atrial sensing, the time to switching, and the mean ventricular rate were measured. Ten episodes of AF from 10 patients (9 men and 1 woman; ages 62 ± 16 years) were included: 1.95 ± 0.97 mV and 196 ± 64 ms. The sensitivity of the algorithm to diagnose atrial tachycardia reached 100%, for an atrial sensitivity set between 0.4 and 1.0 mV. The mean percentages of atrial sensed events were 74%± 18% and 46%± 9% for the "high" and "low" criteria, respectively. The mean diagnostic times were 28 ± 26 seconds and 68 ± 27 seconds, respectively. Sensing of < 23% of AF events resulted in failure to diagnose the arrhythmias by both algorithms. In the event of diagnostic failure, the mean ventricular pacing rate was 79 ± 9 ppm. Conclusion: Up to an atrial sensitivity of 1 mV, 100% of AF episodes were diagnosed. The Chorum mode switching algorithms are 100% reliable if > 45% of the AF waves are sensed. In the event of switching failure, the ventricle is protected by an average rate remaining below 80 ppm. (PACE 1996;     

Implantation of a Dual Chamber Pacing and Sensing Single Pass Defibrillation Lead

GRADAUS, R., et al. : Implantation of a Dual Chamber Pacing and Sensing Single Pass Defibrillation Lead. Dual-chamber ICDs are increasingly used to avoid inappropriate shocks due to supraventricular tachycardias. Additionally, many ICD patients will probably benefit from dual chamber pacing. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the intraoperative performance and short-term follow-up of an innovative single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead capable of bipolar sensing and pacing in the right atrium and ventricle. Implantation of this single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead was successful in all 13 patients (  age 63 ± 8 years  ; LVEF  0.44 ± 0.16  ; New York Heart Association [NYHA]  2.4 ± 0.4  , previous open heart surgery in all patients). The operation time was  79 ± 29  minutes, the fluoroscopy time  4.7 ± 3.1  minutes. No perioperative complications occurred. The intraoperative atrial sensing was  1.7 ± 0.5 mV  , the atrial pacing threshold product was  0.20 ± 0.14 V/ms  (  range 0.03–0.50 V/ms  ). The defibrillation threshold was  8.8 ± 2.7 J  . At prehospital discharge and at 1-month and 3-month follow-up, atrial sensing was  1.9 ± 0.9, 2.1 ± 0.5, and 2.7 ± 0.6 mV  , respectively, (  P = NS, P < 0.05, P < 0.05  to implant, respectively), the mean atrial threshold product  0.79, 1.65, and 1.29 V/ms  , respectively. In two patients, an intermittent exit block occurred in different body postures. All spontaneous and induced ventricular arrhythmias were detected and terminated appropriately. Thus, in a highly selected patient group, atrial and ventricular sensing and pacing with a single lead is possible under consideration of an atrial pacing dysfunction in 17% of patients.     

Detection of Atrial Fibrillation During Sinus Tachycardia Induced by Exercise in Patients with Implantable Atrial Defibrillators

Accurate detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) is essential for appropriate operation of an implantable atrial defibrillator (IAD). However, during episodes of sinus tachycardia, distinction between AF and sinus rhythm (SR) using the quiet interval and baseline crossing analysis in the detection algorithm of the IAD may be difficult. The efficacy of this AF detection algorithm was tested in five patients implanted with an IAD (MFTRIX, Model 3000 or 3020, InControl Inc.) during treadmill exercise testing. The IADs were programmed to Monitor Mode with a wake up cycle of 1 minute for AF detection using the device nominal parameters or modified parameters, and to mark rhythms appropriate for shock delivery. A mean peak heart rate of 137 ± 26 beats/min was reached during maximum exercise, and one patient developed transient AF. Seventy-eight (75 in SR, 3 in AF) and 91 (89 in SR, 2 in AF) runs of AF detection were performed using the nominal and modified parameters, respectively. The IAD detected AF and SR accurately, except for one episode of false-positive AF detection during sinus tachycardia at the nominal settings, but inappropriate shocks were prevented by minimum RR interval criteria that limited discharge at high heart rate. These results indicate that the AF detection algorithm in the IAD may become more vulnerable to false-positive AF detection during sinus tachycardia, which were avoided by reprogramming the Quiet Interval and minimum RR interval criteria for AF detection. Exercise testing appeared useful to program optimal settings of the IAD in preparation for daily activities.     

Atrial Fibrillatory Electrogram Measurement Allows Atrial Lead Placement in Patients Who Develop Atrial Fibrillation During Permanent Dual Chamber Pacemaker Implantation

The benefit of DDD(R) pacing is proven even in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation developing during dual chamber pacemaker implantation creates a difficult problem. Maneuvers to reestablish a stable atrial rhythm often are required if atrial fibrillation sets in. This study was performed to determine if atrial lead placement can be performed with acceptable long-term results in the presence of atrial fibrillation. Twenty-one patients in whom atrial fibrillation developed during permanent pacemaker implantation were included in this study. In 12 patients, episodes of intermittent atrial fibrillation had been documented before the procedure. Screw-in leads were used in 15 patients and J-shaped passive fixation leads in 6 patients. AH leads were bipolar. The intraoperative atrial fibrillation electrogram amplitudes ranged from 0.9 to 3.2 mV (mean 1.8 ± 0.6 mV). One patient required lead revision due to a high atrial pacing threshold after conversion to SR. One patient remained in atrial fibrillation at 3-month follow-up. The other 20 patients converted to SR, 11 of whom had intermittent atrial fibrillation with successful mode switch activation. P wave amplitudes were 2.8 ± 6 mV (range 1.4 to 4.0 mV) after conversion to SR. The mean atrial pacing threshold was 1.1 ± 0.5 V (range 0.5 to 3.5 V). Placement of atrial leads in patients who develop atrial fibrillation during pacemaker implantation is feasible; fibrillatory electrogram amplitudes showed a good correlation with the atrial signal after conversion to an organized atrial rhythm (r = 0.698). Acceptable atrial pacing thresholds can be expected as well.     

Impact of Right Ventricular Pacing Sites on Exercise Capacity during Ventricular Rate Regularization in Patients with Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

Background: The deleterious effects of right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing may offset the potential benefit of ventricular rate (VR) regularization and rate adaptation during an exercise in patient's atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We studied 30 patients with permanent AF and symptomatic bradycardia who receive pacemaker implantation with RVA (n = 15) or right ventricular septal (RVS, n = 15) pacing. All the patients underwent an acute cardiopulmonary exercise testing using VVI‐mode (VVI‐OFF) and VVI‐mode with VR regularization (VRR) algorithm on (VVI‐ON). Results: There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups, except pacing QRS duration was significantly shorter during RVS pacing than RVA pacing (138.9 ± 5 vs 158.4 ± 6.1 ms, P = 0.035). Overall, VVI‐ON mode increased the peak exercise VR, exercise time, metabolic equivalents (METs), and peak oxygen consumption (VO₂max), and decreased the VR variability compared with VVI‐OFF mode during exercise (P < 0.05), suggesting that VRR pacing improved exercise capacity during exercise. However, further analysis on the impact of VRR pacing with different pacing sites revealed that only patients with RVS pacing but not patients with RVA pacing had significant increased exercise time, METs, and VO₂max during VVI‐ON compared with VVI‐OFF, despite similar changes in peaked exercise VR and VR variability. Conclusion: In patients with permanent AF, VRR pacing at RVS, but not at RVA, improved exercise capacity during exercise.     

Does Atrial Fibrillation Beget Ventricular Fibrillation in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction?

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased mortality and a higher complication rate postmyocardial infarction (MI), but the exact mechanisms are unknown. We investigated whether AF predisposes to ventricular arrhythmia in postmyocardial infarct patients, thereby accounting for increased mortality. Methods: Five hundred consecutive patients admitted to our coronary care unit with acute MI were monitored for in‐hospital arrhythmias. Detailed information was also compiled on past history, co‐morbidities, electrolyte disturbances, drug therapies, and ejection fraction. Mortality data were collected for an average of 5.5 years. Results: The results have shown that the incidence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) is much greater in patients presenting with AF (P = 0.03) and multivariate analysis has shown that AF is independently associated with the development of VF. This association occurs principally in patients who are admitted with AF (P = 0.01) rather than those who develop it during their admission, although these patients are also at mildly increased risk. The increased incidence of VF does account for increased mortality in the AF patients but does not explain all of their excess risk. There was no association between AF and ventricular tachycardia (VT); P = 0.50. Conclusions: In conclusion, AF on admission to the hospital with acute MI is associated with an increased risk of VF and subsequent mortality.     

Single Chamber Atrial Fibrillation Involving Only the Left Atrium:

KARCH, M.R., et al. : Single Chamber Atrial Fibrillation Involving Only the Left Atrium: Implications for Maintenance and Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy. Due to the anatomic and the functional interatrial relationship, AF is a biatrial process. Whether one of the atria could sustain AF is not known. This study included 11 patients (mean age   ^{± 1}   years, 7 men) with AF who showed a distinct activation pattern, characterized by regular activity in the right atrium (RA) and irregular fibrillatory activity confined to the left atrium (LA) throughout the AF episodes. Each of the atria was mapped with 64-electrode basket catheters. AF was monitored for   74 ± 26 minutes   . Complex and irregular activity with a cycle length of   138 ± 43 ms   was observed in the LA throughout the monitoring time. The posterior and the roof of the LA showed the highest degree of disorganization. RA was activated by regular wavefronts with a cycle length of   194 ± 22 ms   (   P < 0.001   , compared with LA). No fibrillatory activity was observed in the RA. All wavefronts that activated the RA were of septal origin: high anteroseptal 52%, low posteroseptal 22%, mid-septal 18, and dual wavefronts (from the high anteroseptal and low posteroseptal pathways) 8%. The lateral wall of the RA was activated in a superoinferior direction in 82% of all activations. A left-to-right conduction block during AF and a rotor of fibrillatory activity located in the posterior wall of the LA were observed in two patients. Isolated AF in the LA showed various surface electrocardiographic patterns. It is concluded that LA alone without participation of the RA can sustain AF. These data have implications for mechanisms and the ablative therapy of AF. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. I]:883–891)     

Acute Effects of Different Atrial Pacing Sites in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of Single Site and Biatrial Pacing

It has been reported that a trial single site or biatrial pacing can suppress the occurrence of AF. However, its mechanism remains unclear. The study population included 32 patients with AF (n = 20: AF group), or without paroxysmal AF (n = 12: control group). The mechanism and efficacy of atrial pacing were investigated by electrophysiological studies to determine which was more effective for suppressing AF induction; single site pacing of the right atrial appendage (RAA) or distal coronary sinus (CS-d), or biatrial (simultaneous BAA and CS-d) pacing. In the AF group, AF inducibility was significantly higher with BAA extrastimulus during RAA (12/20; P < 0.0001) or biatrial paced drive (7/20; P < 0.01) than during CS-d paced drive (0/20). In the control group, AF was not induced at any site paced. In the AF group, the conduction delay and other parameters of atrial vulnerability significantly improved during CS-d paced drive. The atrial recovery time (ART) at RAA and CS-d was measured during each basic pacing mode. ART was defined as the sum of the activation time and refractory period, and the difference between ARTs at RAA and CS-d was calculated as the ART difference (ARTD). The ARTD was significantly longer during BAA pacing in the AF group than in control group (155.0 +/- 32.8 vs 128.8 +/- 32.9 ms, P < 0.05). In the AFgroup, ARTDs during biatrial (52.0 +/- 24.2 ms) and CS-d pacing (51.7 +/- 26.0 ms) were significantly shorter than ARTD during RAA pacing. The CS-d paced drive was more effective for suppressing AF induction than biatrial or RAA paced drive by alleviating conduction delay. CS-d and biatrial pacing significantly reduced ARTD compared with RAA pacing.     

Rate Stabilization by Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

A recent study of de Jongste has demonstrated the lengthening of short R-R intervals in patients with atrial fibrillation by right ventricular pacing. We have further analyzed the data from this study and specifically looked at the effect of right ventricular pacing on the R-R interval instability and heart rate. At the cost of only a slight increase in mean heart rate, a major reduction of the R-R interval instability can be obtained by right ventricular pacing. Based on these findings, we have developed and evaluated an automatic pacing rate algorithm, which continuously varies the stimulation rate in order to stabilize the otherwise irregular rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation.     

How Reliable is Atrial Sensing in Single-Lead VDD Pacing: Comparison of Three Systems

This study evaluated the reliability of atrial sensing, expressed as AV synchronous stimulation, in three VDD systems with the atrial sensitivity (AS) programmed to a conventional value with a 2:1 safety margin compared to most-sensitive values. We studied 34 sex- and age-matched patients with 3 VDD systems: 14 with Unity 292–07, 10 with Saphir 600, and 10 with Thera VDD (5 model 8948 and 5 model 8968i). Two 24-hour Hollers were performed on consecutive days. The AS was programmed in a randomized order to its most-sensitive value or to a 2:1 safety margin. All other parameters were programmed identically. The patients underwent a myopotential oversensing test and a daily life activity protocol. A beat-to-beat analysis of the Holters was performed to determine AV synchrony. For the entire group AV synchrony with conventional AS was 98.63%± 2.57%, compared to 99.80%± 0.43% with most-sensitive values (p = 0.002). There was no difference between the three systems with conventional AS. With the most-sensitive AS, AV synchrony was: Unity 99.99%± 0.03%, Saphir 99.42%± 0.60% (P = 0.002), Thera 99.81 %± 0.35% (ns). In the Saphir system with an atrial blanking period of 150 ms, ventricular far-field sensing could be demonstrated in 5 of 10 patients. This reduced the percentage of AV synchrony due to an unwanted mode-switch to a nontracking mode. Myopotential oversensing was not detected in any patient. Conclusion: The VDD systems tested under identical conditions showed reliable P wave sensing at the most-sensitive atrial sensing setting without myopotential oversensing. Ventricular far-field sensing reduced AV synchrony and must be avoided by appropriate refractory periods.