Enhanced recovery from obstetric surgery: a UK survey of practice

BackgroundIn the UK earlier discharge of patients following elective caesarean section would require that more patients are discharged the day after surgery. The introduction of enhanced recovery in other specialties has resulted in shorter postoperative stay. We surveyed current UK practice to find whether this was consistent with enhanced recovery and what changes units would need to introduce to establish such a programme.MethodsWe conducted an Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association approved electronic survey of all the UK lead obstetric anaesthetists between March and May 2013.ResultsA response rate of 81% was achieved with 96% of those who responded supporting the concept of enhanced recovery. Only 4% of units routinely discharged their patients on day one. There were a number of practices consistent with enhanced recovery. Postoperative pain was controlled by regular paracetamol (97%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (100% when not contraindicated), with oral opioids (68%) being used for breakthrough pain. Over 70% of units allowed minimal interruption of perioperative oral intake and 72% of units mobilised their patients within 12 h of surgery or when the neuraxial block had worn off. In contrast, a minority of units monitored patient temperature in theatre (27%) or used active warming (18%), and 28% routinely removed the urinary catheter within 12 h of surgery or when the neuraxial block had worn off. Regarding neonatal recovery, only 23% reported using delayed cord clamping and 53% used skin-to-skin contact in theatre.ConclusionMost obstetric units support the concept of enhanced recovery following caesarean section and many could introduce a programme for elective surgery with relatively small changes in patient care.     

The management of eclampsia by obstetric anaesthetists in UK: a postal survey

Eclampsia and pre-eclampsia are major causes of morbidity and mortality in the obstetric population. The latest triennial report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths found hypertensive disorders of pregnancy to be the second most common cause of maternal deaths directly attributable to pregnancy. The management of eclampsia includes the control and prevention of further convulsions by pharmacological methods but the choice of drugs may vary. Current evidence supports the use of magnesium sulphate as the drug of first choice for treating eclampsia. Until recently, UK clinicians used other anticonvulsants for this purpose. Questionnaire studies conducted amongst UK obstetricians published in 1991 and 1998 showed that magnesium sulphate was used in the management of severe pre-eclampsia by 2% and 40% of clinicians respectively. We conducted a survey among lead obstetric anaesthetists in 264 obstetric units in the UK to examine their current practice. We also asked how magnesium was used and included a question on the use of nimodipine. The response rate was 86%. Our results show that magnesium sulphate is used for the treatment of eclampsia in 90% of units and for severe pre-eclampsia in 68%. Most administered magnesium for 24-48 h while nimodipine was used by very few units.     

Obstetric epidural test doses: a survey of UK practice

BACKGROUND: With the advent of low-dose epidural analgesia in labour, the content of the test dose has once again become the subject of debate. METHOD: A postal survey of 500 members of the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association was conducted in 1999-2000, assessing the use of test doses during epidurals in labour and for caesarean section. RESULTS: There was a 67% response rate. Test doses are used in labour, at elective caesarean section and before epidural top-up for emergency caesarean section, by 90%, 93% and 37%, respectively. There was large variation in both drugs and doses. During labour, doses of bupivacaine range from 3 to 20 mg and of lidocaine 15 to 90 mg. There has been a three-fold increase in the use of low-dose local anaesthetic test doses since a previous national survey in 1997. The size of local anaesthetic test doses used at caesarean section is also variable. Epinephrine is used in 5% of labour, 14% of elective and 34% of emergency caesarean sections. Signs and symptoms that are commonly sought after test doses include somatic motor block, blood pressure change, sensory effect and symptoms from systemic local anaesthetic. The effect of the test dose is usually assessed after 5 min. CONCLUSION: There is no consensus about the nature of the ideal test dose in obstetric anaesthesia. There is a trend to use less concentrated test doses during labour. Doses that risk a high block if given spinally are still used. Epinephrine, aspiration testing and cardiovascular monitoring are uncommon.     

Central nerve block and coagulation: a survey of obstetric anaesthetists

We conducted a survey amongst anaesthetists in 264 obstetric units in the UK to examine their practice in relation to potential clotting abnormalities. The survey was conducted between July and November 1998 and shows a varied opinion and practice. We received a return of 226 (86%) with 64-78% of respondents willing to perform a central nerve block at a platelet count of 80 x 10(9)/L or more. Patients on aspirin alone or aspirin and heparin would be given a central nerve block by up to 96% and 43% of respondents respectively. Following administration of heparin, up to 22% of respondents would perform a central nerve block within 2 h while up to 64% would wait beyond 4 h. Eighty-five units had departmental policies on the removal of epidural catheters but only 15 differentiated between unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin.     

A change in resistance? A survey of epidural practice amongst obstetric anaesthetists

Five hundred members of the Obstetric Anaesthetists Association were surveyed regarding their technique for identification of the epidural space. Eighty-one per cent of the questionnaires were returned completed. Fifty-nine per cent of respondents first learned a loss of resistance to air technique, 33.4% to saline and 7.4% another technique. Presently, 37.1% and 52.7% use only a loss of resistance to air or saline, respectively. Six per cent use both techniques and 3.2% use other techniques. Twenty-eight per cent taught a loss of resistance to air, 57.2% taught a loss of resistance to saline and 12.9% taught both techniques. Twenty-three per cent changed from a loss of resistance to air, to a saline technique, and 4.2% vice versa. Forty-seven per cent of those using air felt that loss of resistance to air was not associated with a clinically significant difference in the incidence of accidental dural puncture compared with saline.     

Techniques for identifying the epidural space: a survey of practice amongst anaesthetists in the UK

A postal survey of all UK members of the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association was carried out to ascertain their preferred method for identifying the epidural space in obstetric and non-obstetric patients. Over 1200 questionnaires were returned (79.3% response rate). In obstetric patients, the single most common technique (used by 58% of anaesthetists) was continuous advancement of the epidural needle and loss of resistance with saline, followed by intermittent needle advancement with air (21%). A minority of respondents used other variants, including intermittent advancement with saline (16%) and continuous advancement with air (4%). Consultant anaesthetists showed greater variety in techniques used than did trainees (p < 0.001). Less than 5% of respondents used a paramedian approach, and these were almost exclusively senior staff. Only 48% of anaesthetists said they would try an alternative if they experienced difficulty with their preferred technique. A similar pattern was seen for lumbar epidurals in non-obstetric surgical patients (89% used the same technique as in obstetrics), although for thoracic epidurals, 23% used a different technique to that which they would use for obstetrics, and the paramedian approach was more popular (21%). When inserting lumbar epidurals to supplement general anaesthesia in surgical patients, 18% of anaesthetists said they usually performed the block with the patient asleep, whereas for thoracic epidurals, this figure fell to 14%.     

Aseptic precautions for inserting an epidural catheter: a survey of obstetric anaesthetists

We performed a postal survey of Fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists with a special interest in obstetric practice, about their beliefs regarding aseptic precautions for insertion of an epidural catheter in the labour ward. Of the 435 consultant anaesthetists surveyed, 367 responded (84%), revealing a wide variation in practice. It was not thought to be essential practice to remove a watch before washing hands by 51 respondents (14%), to wear a facemask by 105 (29%) or to wear a sterile gown by 45 (12%). Three anaesthetists (1%) did not believe sterile gloves were essential. However, all respondents indicated that an antiseptic skin preparation was essential. Our results raise questions regarding an acceptable standard of aseptic practice for the insertion of an epidural catheter in labour and we propose a minimal standard of essential precautions.     

Aseptic precautions for inserting an epidural catheter: a survey of obstetric anaesthetists

This study aimed to examine the attitudes of intensivists and haematologists to the use of blood and blood products using a scenario-based postal questionnaire. One hundred and sixty-two intensivists and 77 haematologists responded to the survey. In four scenarios, the baseline haemoglobin thresholds for red cell transfusion ranged from 6 to 12 g.dl(-1). There was significant variation between scenarios (p <0.005). Increasing age, high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Status II score, surgery, acute respiratory distress syndrome, septic shock and lactic acidosis significantly (p <0.005) modified the transfusion threshold. There were greater variations in the baseline threshold for platelet transfusion. The majority of respondents (72.3%) selected a baseline haemoglobin threshold between 9 and 10 g.dl(-1). The thresholds for platelet transfusion were far less consistent.     

Postal survey of paediatric practice and training among consultant anaesthetists in the UK

A postal survey of previous paediatric anaesthetic training,current paediatric experience and man agement of an infant pyloromyotomywas under taken among consultant anaesthetists in the UK. Atotal of 851 questionnaires were returned, giving a responserate of 31%; 352 (41%) consultants had at least one paediatriclist each week, 180 (21%) anaesthetized more than one infantless than 6 months old each month and 373 (44%) had obtainedmore than 6 months' specialist training. Consultants trainedmost recently had received significantly longer (P<0.001)specialist training than their senior colleagues: 558 (66%)consultants dealt with infants requiring a pyloromyotomy, 348with one or two cases annually. Two-thirds preferred to usean i.v. induction technique and less than half used cricoidpressure. Choice of technique was related to the duration ofspecialist paediatric training and when it was received, butnot to current paediatric anaesthetic experience. The resultsare discussed in relation to recently published recommendationson paediatric anaesthetic services.     

Issues of consent for regional analgesia in labour: a survey of obstetric anaesthetists

Anaesthetists are legally obliged to obtain consent and inform patients of material risks prior to administering regional analgesia in labour. We surveyed consultant members of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists with a special interest in obstetric anaesthesia, in order to identify and compare which risks of regional analgesia they report discussing with women prior to and during labour. We also asked about obstetric anaesthetists' beliefs about informed consent, the type of consent obtained and its documentation. Of 542 questionnaires distributed, 291 responses (54%) were suitable for analysis. The five most commonly discussed risks were post dural puncture headache, block failure, permanent neurological injury, temporary leg weakness and hypotension. Obstetric anaesthetists reported discussing a mean of 8.0 (SD 3.8) and 10 (SD 3.8) risks in the labour and antenatal settings respectively. Nearly 20% of respondents did not rank post dural puncture headache among their top five most important risks for discussion. Seventy percent of respondents indicated that they believe active labour inhibits a woman's ability to give 'fully informed consent'. Over 80% of respondents obtain verbal consent and 57 (20%) have no record of the consent or its discussion. Obstetric anaesthetists reported making a considerable effort to inform patients of risks prior to the provision of regional analgesia in labour. Verbal consent may be appropriate for labouring women, using standardized forms that serve as a reminder of the risks, and a record of the discussion. Consensus is required as to what are the levels of risk from regional analgesia in labour.     

The preparation and storage of anaesthetic drugs for obstetric emergencies: a survey of UK practice

BackgroundTraditionally anaesthetic drugs for obstetrics are prepared as a contingency and stored until they are required for emergency use or have expired. Expiry is based on presumed reduction in sterility and efficacy although evidence for this is inconsistent. Preparation in advance introduces the risk of error and potential for tampering by a third party. Discarding and re-preparing drugs daily represents significant wastage with associated cost implications. We predicted that practice of drug preparation would differ widely across the UK, so conducted a national survey.MethodA postal questionnaire was sent to lead consultant obstetric anaesthetists at each of the 223 consultant-led UK obstetric units enquiring about the preparation of anaesthetic drugs for obstetric emergencies.ResultsThe response rate was 75%; 87% of units routinely draw up emergency drugs, most commonly thiopental and succinylcholine. Only 10% routinely use commercially-prepared succinylcholine syringes, although a further 8% would use them if available. Thiopental is prepared by anaesthetists in 78% of units, operating department practitioners in 8% and pharmacy in <7% of cases. Drugs are changed every 24 h in 80% of units and weekly in 6%. With one exception, all units changing drugs weekly use pharmacy-prepared thiopental.ConclusionThe majority of UK obstetric units routinely draw up emergency drugs every 24 h. With conflicting evidence regarding sterility and efficacy this represents tremendous wastage and potential for drug error and tampering. We propose that nationwide introduction of commercially- and pharmacy-prepared drugs with long shelf lives would improve safety and cost effectiveness.     

Provision of long-term venous access procedures by UK anaesthetists: a postal survey

Long-term venous access is widely used in hospital and in the community for cancer chemotherapy, total parenteral nutrition and long-term administration of antibiotics. There is a large variety of catheters, ports and other devices designed to facilitate these treatments. A postal survey of anaesthetic departments in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland was undertaken to assess the role of anaesthetists in this area of clinical practice. Two hundred and fifteen out of 276 (78%) anaesthetic departments responded. Forty-three percent of departments (92 out of 215) provided some form of long-term vascular access service. Twenty-two percent of departments which provided this service (20 out of 92) had anaesthetists with sessional allocation for such procedures. Such work represents a significant workload for anaesthetic departments which is likely to increase over time.     

The delivery of obstetric anaesthetic care in UK maternity units: a survey of practice in 2021

BackgroundAnaesthetists are crucial members of the maternity unit team, providing peri-operative analgesia and anaesthesia, and supporting the delivery of medical care to high-risk women. The effective contribution from obstetric anaesthetists to safety in maternity units depends on how anaesthesia services are organised and resourced. There is a lack of information on how obstetric anaesthetic care is resourced in the UK.MethodsThe Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association surveyed UK clinical leads for their hospital’s obstetric anaesthetic service and examined compliance with national recommendations.ResultsThere were 153 responses by lead obstetric anaesthetists from 184 maternity units in the UK (83%). The number of consultants per 1000 deliveries was 2.2 [1.6–2.7] (median [IQR]). In 20% of units, there was a dedicated on-call rota (on-call only for obstetric anaesthesia), whilst the remainder had a ‘combined’ on-call rota (on-call for other clinical areas in addition to obstetrics). Multidisciplinary ward rounds were held in 83% of units. Twenty-five (16%) units reported having no regular multidisciplinary ward rounds, of which nine (6%) did not have any multidisciplinary ward rounds. Planned operating lists for elective caesarean sections were provided in 77% of units.ConclusionsIn the largest survey of obstetric anaesthesia workload to be reported for any health system, we found significant disparities between obstetric anaesthesia service provision and current national recommendations for areas including consultant staffing, support for elective caesarean section lists, antenatal anaesthetic clinics, and consultant support for service development. Wide national variation in service provision was identified.     

How UK obstetric anaesthetists assess neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: National surveys of practice conducted in 2004 and 2010

BackgroundThere is much interest in optimal methods of assessing neuraxial block before caesarean delivery. Although cold sensation is commonly used, some evidence suggests that the risk of intraoperative pain may be reduced by assessing light touch. We aimed to determine how neuraxial anaesthesia was managed perioperatively, and whether changes in clinical practice reflected the differing evidence in the literature over six years.MethodsA survey was sent to UK consultant OAA members in 2004, asking how neuraxial block was assessed before caesarean delivery, what was documented, what information was given to the patient, and postoperative follow-up. The survey was repeated in 2010.ResultsCompared to all other methods of assessing neuraxial block, ethyl chloride was the most popular in 2004 (71.8%, 95% CI 68.3–75.0, P < 0.0001) and 2010 (74.6%, 95% CI 70.8–78.3, P < 0.0001). There was a non-significant increase in light touch use from 54% to 60.1%. The upper level of block varied with the modality tested. There was a significant increase in respondents testing with light touch to T5.ConclusionsMethods of assessing neuraxial block differed from those recommended in the literature. The wide range of modalities, methods of testing and targeted sensory levels suggest that clearer recommendations on best practice for assessment and documentation of neuraxial block before caesarean delivery are required.     

Awake fibreoptic intubation skills in obstetric patients: a survey of anaesthetists in the Oxford region

A survey of anaesthetists in the Oxford region was conducted to determine their skills and practice in performing awake fibreoptic intubation. Forty-two consultant obstetric anaesthetists (group O), 21 consultant anaesthetists with an interest in difficult airway management (group D) and 20 anaesthetic specialist registrars in their final training year (group S) were sent a questionnaire on management of a patient with a known difficult airway for elective caesarean section. All but one responded. If regional anaesthesia was unsuccessful or contraindicated, 75/82 respondents (91.5%) would choose to secure the airway by awake intubation. Of the remaining seven, six would use general anaesthesia and spontaneous respiration, five (6.1%) with the laryngeal mask airway and one (1.2%) with mask and airway and one (1.2%) local infiltration by the surgeon. Although awake fibreoptic intubation was the technique chosen by 98.7%, only six (8.1%) had experience of its performance in an obstetric patient. Of the 68 anaesthetists without such experience, only 12/31 (38.7%) group O compared to 13/18 (72.2%) group D and 12/19 (63.2%) group S would be confident to perform awake fibreoptic intubation in an obstetric patient. Only one anaesthetist in the survey practised awake fibreoptic intubation in non-obstetric patients regularly (>3/month). However, 69/82 respondents replied that all consultant obstetric anaesthetists should be experienced in performing awake fibreoptic intubation. We conclude that despite the value of awake fibreoptic intubation, consultant obstetric anaesthetists are less confident in performing it than those with an interest in difficult airway management and final year specialist registrars.