＂Anti-HBc alone＂ in human immunodeficiency virus-positive and immuno-suppressed lymphoma patients

Hepatitis B virus （HBV） infection is endemic in various parts of the world. A proportion of patients have resolved prior exposure to HBV, as evidenced by the clearance of circulating hepatitis B surface antigen and the appearance of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen （anti-HBc）, which could produce protective antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen （anti-HBs）. With time, anti-HBs in some patients may become negative. Such patients are described as having occult HBV infection or ＂anti-HBc alone＂. In the context of immunodeficient patients, such as HIV patients or lymphoma patients undergoing immunosuppressive immunotherapy, the lack of protective anti-HBs may increase the risk of hepatitis B reactivation. Serum HBV DNA testing may be necessary in ＂anti-HBc alone＂ patients, to detect patients at a high risk of developing HBV infection allowing appropriate prophylactic management.     

Suboptimal response to hepatitis B vaccine in drug users.

Fifty-five drug users institutionalized in a community for drug detoxification were vaccinated against hepatitis B virus (HBV) with a recombinant yeast-derived vaccine (Engerix B, Smith Kline Biologicals, Belgium). At 0, 1, and 6 months, 20 micrograms of vaccine was given in the deltoid to these patients, of whom 17 had no serum HBV markers, 15 had only the antibody to core antigen (anti-HBc), and 23 had anti-HBc and antibody to the surface antigen (anti-HBs) values lower than the allegedly "protective" value of 10 mIU/mL. Forty-one healthy controls were vaccinated in parallel. At month 7 (ie, 1 month after the third dose of vaccine), in 76% (13/17) of drug users with no HBV markers, 6% (1/15) of those with isolated anti-HBc, and 69% (16/23) of those with anti-HBc and nonprotective anti-HBs, protective anti-HBs titers (greater than or equal to 10 mIU/mL) developed, compared with 97% (40/41) of controls. At month 24, these rates fell to 43% for drug users with no HBV marker, 0% for those with anti-HBc, 31% for those with anti-HBc and anti-HBs, and 86% for controls. The drug users who did not respond to vaccination were more likely to be those with evidence of prior HBV infection and anergy to skin tests. This indicates that unresponsiveness to hepatitis B vaccine in drug users may be due to altered immunity.     

Clinical significance of“anti-HBc alone” in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients

AIM: To determine the prevalence and clinical relevance of isolated antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen as the only marker of infection ("anti-HBc alone") among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type-1 infected patients. Occult hepatitis B infection frequency was also evaluated.METHODS: Three hundred and forty eight histories from 2388 HIV-positive patients were randomly reviewed. Patients with serological markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection were classified into three groups: past hepatitis, "anti-HBc alone" and chronic hepatitis. Determination of DNA from HBV, and RNA and genotype from hepatitis C virus (HCV) were performed on "anti-HBc alone" patients.RESULTS: One hundred and eighty seven (53.7%) HIV-positive patients had markers of HBV infection: 118 past infection (63.1%), 14 chronic hepatitis (7.5%) and 55 "anti-HBc alone" (29.4%). Younger age [2.3-fold higher per every 10 years younger; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.33-4.00] and antibodies to HCV infection [odds ratio (OR) 2.87; 95% CI 1.10-7.48] were factors independently associated with the "anti-HBc alone" pattern. No differences in liver disease frequency were detected between both groups.Serum levels of anti-HBs were not associated with HCV infection (nor viral replication or HCV genotype), or with HIV replication or CD4 level. No "anti-HBc alone" patient tested positive for HBV DNA.CONCLUSION: "Anti-HBc alone" prevalence in HIVpositive patients was similar to previously reported data and was associated with a younger age and with antibodies to HCV infection. In clinical practice, HBV DNA determination should be performed only in those patients with clinical or analytical signs of liver injury.     

Occult Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Hemodialysis Patients With Isolated Hepatitis B Core Antibody: A Multicenter Study

Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is characterized by presence of HBV infection with undetectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Occult HBV infection harbors potential risk of HBV transmission through hemodialysis (HD). The aim of this study was to assess the occult HBV infection in hemodialysis patients with isolated hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc). A total of 289 HD patients from five dialysis units in Tehran, Iran, were included in this study. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), anti-HBc, Hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were tested in all subjects. The presence of HBV-DNA was determined quantitatively in plasma samples of HD patients with isolated anti-HBc (HBsAg negative, anti-HBs negative and anti-HBc positive) by real-time PCR using the artus HBV RG PCR kit on the Rotor-Gene 3000 real-time thermal cycler. Of 289 patients enrolled in this study, 18 subjects (6.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5%–8.9%) had isolated anti-HBc. HBV-DNA was detectable in 9 of 18 patients (50%, 95% CI, 27%–73%) who had isolated anti-HBc. Plasma HBV-DNA load was less than 50 IU/ml in all of these patients. Our study showed that detection of isolated anti-HBc could reflect unrecognized occult HBV infection in HD patients. The majority of these infections are associated with low viral loads.     

Hepatitis B vaccination alone is not adequate for the categorizing of adult subjects with isolated anti-HBc

Abstract To evaluate the meaning of isolated antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), 88 Chinese subjects with isolated anti-HBc received rescreening of hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers. Eighty (90.9%) of them were still positive for this antibody and 29 were also found to be positive for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs). The remaining 51 subjects (58.0%) were positive for anti-HBc alone; 50 of them received a four-dose schedule of hepatitis B (HB) vaccine. After the initial dose, only one vaccinee disclosed an amnestic anti-HBs response, that is, anti-HBs titre > 1000 miu/mL. Forty-five vaccinees completed the vaccination schedule and 44 (97.8%) had anti-HBs response. The anti-HBs responses in 25 of these vaccinees were compared with 25 age- and sex-matched normal susceptible vaccinees. The anti-HBs response rates in both groups were the same (96 vs 96%). However, the geometric mean titre was significantly lower in the vaccinees with isolated anti-HBc (512 mIU/mL vs 4688 mIU/mL, P < 0.001). Prevaccinated sera were available in 49 vaccinees with isolated anti-HBc for detection of antibody to hepatitis B e antigen (anti-HBe) and HBV DNA; 37 (75.5%) of them had one or two of these markers. As we regarded the rescreening of HBV markers, response to hepatitis B vaccination and presence or absence of anti-HBe and/or HBV DNA together for categorizing the 88 subjects with isolated anti-HBc, at least three-quarters of them had past infection of HBV. The subjects with false positive anti-HBc test were a minor group. We concluded that the presence or absence of amnestic anti-HBs response to HB vaccination is not a reliable indicator for categorizing subjects with isolated anti-HBc. Rescreening of HBV markers, with addition of anti-HBe and HBV DNA, may be helpful in determining the necessity of HB vaccination.     

Isolated antibody to hepatitis B core antigen in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of isolated anti-HBc in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and its relation to disease severity. METHODS: We screened all patients with chronic HCV infection referred to King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and anti-HBc. One hundred and sixty nine patients who tested negative for both HBsAg and anti-HBs were included in this study. RESULTS: Pathologically, 59 had biopsy-proven cirrhosis and 110 had chronic active hepatitis (CAH). Of these 169 patients, 85 (50.3%) tested positive for anti-HBc. Patients with CAH had significantly higher prevalence of isolated anti-HBc than patients with cirrhosis, 71 (64.5%) and 14 (23.7%) respectively (P < 0.001). Twenty-five patients were tested for HBV DNA by qualitative PCR. The test was positive in 3 of them (12%; occult HBV infection). CONCLUSION: Isolated anti-HBc alone is common in Saudi patients with chronic HCV infection, and is significantly more common in those with CAH than those with cirrhosis. Therefore, a screening strategy that only tests for HBsAg and anti-HBs in these patients will miss a large number of individuals with isolated anti-HBc, who may be potentially infectious.     

Prevalence and time course of hepatitis B virus infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus under immunosuppressive therapy

Objective

To clarify the prevalence and time course of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus under immunosuppressive therapy.

Methods

We performed serological examination of 248 lupus patients to determine the presence of HBV, including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc). Serum HBV DNA levels were measured in HBsAg-positive patients or resolved HBV carriers (HBsAg-negative, anti-HBs-positive, and/or anti-HBc-positive). If possible, we repeatedly performed examination of markers of HBV infection in resolved carriers.

Results

Two (0.8 %) patients were positive for HBsAg. Among 41 (16.5 %) patients who were considered as resolved HBV carriers, 1 (2.4 %) showed serum HBV DNA, which indicated occult HBV infection. The mean age and positive rate of anti-double stranded DNA antibody were significantly higher in resolved carriers than in anti-HBs- and anti-HBc-negative patients. Repeated examination showed that the anti-HBs and anti-HBc titer decreased below the threshold in 4 resolved carriers.

Conclusions

The prevalence of resolved HBV carriers in Japanese lupus patients was 16.5 %. Among them, occult HBV infection and decrease in anti-HBs and anti-HBc titer were observed. These findings indicated that all lupus patients should undergo serological examination for HBV before treatment. If patients have already been treated, we must carefully monitor their liver function, even when all HBV markers are negative.     

Evidence that anti-HBc but not HBV DNA testing may prevent some HBV transmission by transfusion

Blood donor screening for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) implemented in some countries as a surrogate marker for non-A, non-B hepatitis has been superseded by anti-HCV screening. To assess the value of anti-HBc screening for the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen-negative blood donations that might contain infectious HBV, HBV genomic detection and recipient testing were used. Blood donations were screened and confirmed by multiple anti-HBc assays. Donations containing isolated anti-HBc and those with anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) level < 0.1 IU/ml were tested for the presence of HBV DNA. Recipients of previous donations from the corresponding donors during the previous 5 years were traced and tested for markers of HBV infection. Of 103 869 donations screened, 586 (0.56%) were anti-HBc positive, two of which contained HBsAg, and 413 (0.4%) had protective (>/= 0.1 IU/ml) levels of anti-HBs. Anti-HBs < 0.1 IU/ml was found in 102 of these donations (0.1%) and isolated anti-HBc in 69 (0.07%). No donations with isolated anti-HBc were HBV DNA confirmed positive. Of 278 recipients of previous donations from 171 donors at risk of HBV carriage, 12 had markers of HBV infection. Six recipients had other identified risk factors. An association with blood transfusion was considered probable in two and possible in four recipients. None of the six corresponding donors had detectable HBV DNA 6-40 months after the implicated donation. The frequency of HBV transmission by chronic carriers negative for hepatitis B surface antigen was estimated in this study to be 1 in 52,000 donations (CI 0.3-7.8/100,000) from HBsAg-negative donors. Such HBV infectious donations may not be detected by DNA amplification.     

Reactivation of resolved hepatitis B virus infection after immunosuppression: Is it time to adopt pre-emptive therapy?

New therapeutic options like monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD20/rituximab) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have increased both the effectiveness of therapies and the risk for reactivation of Hepatitis B virus (HBV). We describe two cases with serological evidence of resolved HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative/antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) positive), who developed reverse seroconversion (clearance of HBsAb/appearance of HBsAg) with active HBV infection after treatment with combination of conventional chemotherapy, rituximab and autologous HSCT for hematological malignancies. Review of the literature highlights the increasing incidence of HBV reactivation in patients with resolved infection and raises concerns as to whether current guidelines for pre-chemotherapy screening with sensitive HBV-DNA assays and serial monitoring for anti-HBs titres should be implemented also for patients with resolved infection. Future studies should aim at clarifying the cost-benefit from administration of nucleoside analogues in these patients.     

Evolution of hepatitis B serological markers in HIV-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Evolution of serological markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriage or infection has rarely been investigated among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS: During the period 1997-2002, a total of 633 HIV-infected patients were tested for HBV serological markers at baseline, including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs ), antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody (anti-HCV) antibody, HCV RNA level, and HBV DNA level, all of which were retested at least 1 year apart. Medical records were reviewed to identify clinical characteristics associated with evolution of these serological markers. RESULTS: After a median duration of follow-up for 4.96 years, 161 patients (25.4%) had changes in HBV serological markers. Of 119 patients (18.8%) who tested positive for HBsAg at baseline, 6 (5.0%) developed anti-HBs, and 9 (7.6%) developed isolated anti-HBc. Of 270 patients (42.7%) who tested positive for anti-HBs, 18 (6.7%) lost anti-HBs. Of 179 patients (28.3%) in whom isolated anti-HBc had been detected, 73 (40.8%) developed anti-HBs, 18 (10.1%) lost all HBV markers, and 7 (3.9%) developed HBsAg. Of 65 patients (10.2%) who tested negative for all HBV markers, 13 (20%) developed anti-HBs, 13 (20%) developed isolated anti-HBc, and 4 (6.2%) developed HBsAg, indicating a high risk of HBV exposure. Patients in whom anti-HBc was detected at baseline were more likely to have acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (P=.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that an increase in the CD4 cell count after the commencement of HAART was significantly associated with persistence or subsequent development of anti-HBs in patients with anti-HBs or anti-HBc at baseline, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Periodic measurements of HBV serological markers in HIV-infected patients are recommended, because new HBV infections and changes of HBV serological markers are not uncommon in patients with improved immunity after commencement of HAART.     

Anti-HBc screening of blood donors: a comparison of nine anti-HBc tests

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Since voluntary introduction of hepatitis B virus (HBV) minipool nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) at the German Red Cross, the expected residual risk of a transfusion-associated HBV infection has been estimated to be 1 : 500,000 - about 10 times higher than for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Donors demonstrating chronic positivity for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), negativity for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-negative with a low virus load are a major cause of this increased risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten-thousand blood donors from our blood-donation centre were screened for anti-HBc using the current PRISM HBc and the new PRISM HBcore assay to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of these tests. PRISM HBc- or PRISM HBcore-reactive samples were further analysed using seven additional tests for anti-HBc, two tests for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), one test for antibody to hepatitis B envelope antigen (anti-HBe) and three HBV NAT assays. RESULTS: From a total of 10,000 donors, nine and 14 samples were reactive only in the PRISM HBc and the PRISM HBcore, respectively, whereas 165 samples were reactive in both anti-HBc assays. Further analysis of these 188 anti-HBc-reactive specimens in a total of nine different anti-HBc assays revealed concordant results for 162 (86.2%) specimens. Sample cut-off values for anti-HBc were significantly (P < 0.01) lower for anti-HBc-only reactive samples compared with specimens that were also reactive for anti-HBs or anti-HBe. CONCLUSIONS: Both PRISM anti-HBc assays revealed that approximately 1.8% of non-prescreened blood donors from Germany were reactive for anti-HBc. Although sensitivity was comparable between both assays, specificity was increased significantly with the PRISM HBcore. High anti-HBc sample cut-off values were indicative for reactivity in other HBV parameters and for concordant results in the nine different anti-HBc assays. Look-back investigations are necessary to estimate the infection risk both of anti-HBc-only positive and of anti-HBc/anti-HBs-positive blood transfusions.     

Long-term immunogenicity and efficacy of universal hepatitis B virus vaccination in Taiwan

The long-term immunogenicity of universal hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine is seldom studied in large-scale prospective community-based populations, especially in adolescents. This study enrolled 1200 children aged 7 years with complete HBV immunization in infancy and determined HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), its antibody (anti-HBs), and HBV core antibody (anti-HBc) annually until the children were aged 14 years. Eleven children had new HBV infections with anti-HBc positivity as the only marker. None became positive for HBsAg or had detectable HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction. The percentage of protective anti-HBs in 951 children without booster vaccination gradually decreased from 71.1% at age 7 years to 37.4% at age 12 years. Only 1 of the 200 children in the booster group and 2 of the 258 children in the nonbooster group developed new anti-HBc positivity. The results suggest that routine booster vaccination may not be required to provide protection against chronic HBV infection before age 15 years.     

Diagnosis and management of hepatitis B virus and HIV coinfection

HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection increases HIV and HBV replication, hepatitis flares, and risk of progression to chronic HBV infection, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. HIV and HBV coinfection decreases frequency of hepatitis Be antibody (anti-HBe) and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) seroconversion, increases risk of antiretroviral therapy-related hepatotoxicity, and reduces efficacy of HBV therapy. All newly diagnosed HIV patients should be screened for hepatitis A, B, and C viruses and vaccinated if not immune to hepatitis A or B viruses. HBV serology often is atypical in coinfection. Diagnosis of HBV coinfection in HIV infection is made on the basis of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive, hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc total)-positive, anti-HBs-positive status. Alanine aminotransferase levels in coinfected patients often are not reliable markers of liver inflammation. HBV infection should always be treated if coinfected patients are receiving antiretroviral therapy, since immune reconstitution under antiretroviral therapy poses risk for immune-associated liver damage in these patients. This article summarizes a presentation on HIV and HBV coinfection made by Marion G. Peters, MD, at an International AIDS Society-USA Continuing Medical Education course in San Francisco in May 2007.     

Response to hepatitis B vaccine in HIV-1-positive subjects who test positive for isolated antibody to hepatitis B core antigen: implications for hepatitis B vaccine strategies

BACKGROUND: Whether human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-positive subjects who test positive for isolated antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) should be vaccinated with hepatitis B vaccine is not certain. Development of an anamnestic response after vaccination would suggest previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, in which case vaccination is not necessary. METHODS: Sixty-nine HIV-1-positive subjects who tested negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) received vaccination with standard hepatitis B vaccine. Twenty-nine subjects (42%) tested positive for anti-HBc, and 40 (58%) tested negative for anti-HBc. An anamnestic response was defined as an anti-HBs titer of >or=10 IU/L within 4 weeks of the first vaccination. RESULTS: The overall anamnestic response rate was 16% and was not significantly different between subjects who tested positive for anti-HBc (24%) and those who tested negative for anti-HBc (10%) before vaccination (P=.18). Approximately 50% of subjects who tested positive for anti-HBc also tested positive for antibody to hepatitis Be antigen (anti-HBe). The anamnestic response rate was higher in subjects who tested positive for both anti-HBc and anti-HBe (43%) than in subjects who tested positive for anti-HBc but negative for anti-HBe (7%) (P=.035). After a complete series of vaccinations, HIV-1/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected subjects were less likely to achieve high anti-HBs titers than were subjects infected with HIV-1 alone. CONCLUSIONS: After hepatitis B vaccination, the anamnestic response rate in HIV-1-positive subjects who tested positive for isolated anti-HBc but negative for anti-HBe was low and was comparable to that in subjects who tested negative for anti-HBc. This finding suggests that testing for anti-HBc alone may not be a reliable assessment of protection from HBV infection. HIV-1/HCV coinfection may be associated with impaired responses to hepatitis B vaccine, and evaluation of strategies to improve immunogenicity of the vaccine in such individuals is warranted.     

Intrahepatic HBV DNA and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) levels in patients positive for anti-HBc and negative for HBsAg

Covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) is a unique episomal replicative intermediate molecule of hepatitis B virus (HBV) which plays a key role in viral persistence. The aim of this study was to prove cccDNA persistence in the liver tissue of patients negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and positive for antibody to hepatitis core antigen (anti-HBc). Intrahepatic HBV DNA and cccDNA were determined using real-time and semi-nested PCR assays on the liver tissues of 35 patients who were negative for HBsAg and positive for anti-HBc with or without anti-HBs. HBV DNA was detected in the liver tissue of 4 out of 35 patients who were positive for anti-HBc. None of the samples harbored cccDNA. In this study population, which is of Asian origin, very low levels of HBV DNA were detected in a small percentage of patients with anti-HBc. Even using the highly sensitive semi-nested PCR assay, HBV cccDNA was not detectable in any anti-HBc positive patients either with or without anti-HBs.     

Isolated antibodies against the core antigen of hepatitis B virus in HIV-infected patients

The aim of this study was to describe the frequency and significance of isolated antibodies against the hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antigen (HBc) in 2185 HIV-infected patients of the Aquitaine Cohort. Antibodies against HBc were found in 372 subjects (17%). Patients with isolated anti-HBc antibodies were more frequently coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) (58.2%) than those who were anti-HB surface (HBs) antibody positive (22.9%, P<0.001) and those who were dually reactive anti-HBs/anti-HBc antibody positive (27.3%, P<0.001). These results suggest interactions between HBV and HCV. As observed in patients not infected with HIV, the "anti-HBc-alone" serological profile could reflect essentially late immunity with undetectable anti-HBs antibodies. However, an occult HBV infection cannot be ruled out.     

Antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen as the sole hepatitis B marker in hospital personnel

The epidemiologic and serologic differences between hospital employees with antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) alone or in combination with antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) were evaluated. Of 105 employees with anti-HBs, 38 (36%) did not have anti-HBc. Sera from employees with anti-HBs alone had significantly lower mean sample ratio units of anti-HBs than sera with both antibodies (15.9 +/- 43.2 as compared to 110.3 +/- 73.9, p less than 0.0005) and more commonly had less than 10 sample ratio units of anti-HBs (32 [84%] of 38 as compared to 9 [13%] of 67, p = 0.0001). The anti-HBs in sera with anti-HBs alone was predominantly IgM as shown by inactivation with 2-mercaptoethanol and the presence of anti-HBs activity in serum IgM fractions. Failure of protection from hepatitis B virus infection in persons with anti-HBs alone and the presence of nonprotective IgM anti-HBs in chimpanzees has been reported. Our data suggest the use of anti-HBs as a single serologic screening test for hepatitis B virus immunization programs may not be reliable in identifying employees with protective antibodies.     

Hepatitis B virus markers in the population of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

A total of 542 serum samples from healthy adults (medical students and medical staff, blood donors and pregnant women) residing in or near the city of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania were examined for markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Of these samples, 95 (17.5%) were not found to contain any HBV marker when examined by enzyme-linked immunoassay for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc). HBsAg was demonstrated in 52 (9.6%) samples of which 7 (13.5%) were positive for hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) and 17 (32.7%) were positive for anti-HBc IgM. None of 9 HBsAg positive pregnant women were carriers of HBeAg. These results show that hepatitis B infection is very common in this country. The relatively low prevalence of HBeAg among HBsAg carriers may indicate that transmission of hepatitis B at birth is not of major importance.     

Prophylaxis of hepatitis B reactivation with immunosuppressive therapy in rheumatic diseases. Orientations for clinical practice

Reactivation of infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a potentially serious complication of immunosuppression, which can be identified and efficiently prevented. There have been an increasing number of cases of HBV reactivation in patients receiving immunosuppression in the context of rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus. The recommendations in this area should be individualized taking into account two aspects: immunosuppressive regimens used (high or low risk of reactivation) and the different stages of HBV infection: chronic hepatitis B, inactive HBV carrier, occult hepatitis B infection defined by HB surface antigen (HBsAg) negative and antibody anti-HB core (anti-HBc) positive. In patients with rheumatic diseases that will start high-risk immunosuppressive drugs, we propose a universal screening with serological tests for hepatitis B (HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HBc). Patients with chronic hepatitis B (HBsAg positive, HBV DNA ≥ 2000 IU/ml, elevated ALT) should initiate antiviral therapy. Inactive HBV carriers (HBsAg positive, HBV DNA <2000 IU / ml, normal aminotransferases) exposed to high risk immunosuppressive therapy should undergo prophylaxis of HBV reactivation. Prophylaxis should be started 2 to 4 weeks before the beginning of immunosuppressive therapy and maintained for at least 6 to 12 months after its suspension. It is recommended to use entecavir or tenofovir as first line antiviral agents. In inactive HBsAg carriers under low-risk immunosuppressive therapy and patients with HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive (HBV infection in the past), the strategy should be monitoring of viral reactivation with aminotransferases and HBV DNA determination in every 6 months.