Reinterpretation of histology of proximal colon polyps called hyperplastic in 2001

AIM： To evaluate how proximal colon polyps interpreted as hyperplastic polyps in 2001 would be interpreted by expert pathologists in 2007.
METHODS： ≥ 5 mm in interpreted pathologists 2007 by 3 GI Forty consecutive proximal colon polyps size, removed in 2001, and originally as hyperplastic polyps by general at Indiana University, were reviewed in pathologists.
CONCLUSION： Many polyps interpreted as hyperplastic in 2001 were considered sessile serrated lesions by GI pathologists in 2007, but there is substantial inter-observer variation amongst GI pathologists.     

Step section histology of proximal colon polyps that appear hyperplastic by endoscopy

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have identified a group of polyps, usually located in the proximal colon, with distinct endoscopic features that predict hyperplastic histology. These polyps may occasionally have foci of dysplastic (adenomatous) tissue. We aimed to define the prevalence of adenomatous foci in these polyps. METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive hyperplastic-appearing proximal colon polyps were sectioned at 1-mm intervals for histological analysis. RESULTS: All 51 polyps were hyperplastic, but two (4%) had foci of adenomatous tissue. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of adenomatous foci in proximal colon polyps with endoscopic features of hyperplastic polyps is low. Whether endoscopic resection of polyps with these features is warranted remains uncertain.     

Risk of proximal colon neoplasia with distal hyperplastic polyps: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Most guidelines for colorectal cancer screening do not consider distal hyperplastic polyps (HPs) to be markers for proximal colon neoplasia. However, many studies have shown an increased risk of proximal neoplasia (PN) in patients with distal HPs. We performed a systematic review to assess the association between distal HPs and PN. METHODS: We identified studies that compared the prevalence of PN and proximal advanced neoplasia in patients with distal HPs vs controls. Two masked investigators extracted data on individuals with distal HPs, distal adenomas, or no distal polyps. Using the DerSimonian and Laird method, we calculated summary risk ratios. Extensive subgroup analysis was performed. RESULTS: The prevalence of PN and proximal advanced neoplasia in persons with distal HPs was 26.0% and 4.4%, respectively. In studies comparing the risk of PN in patients with distal HPs vs those with no distal polyps, the summary risk ratio was 1.81 (95% confidence interval, 1.20-2.73). However, this increased risk disappeared if only high-quality studies on screening patients were considered. The risk ratio was 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.80) when comparing the risk of PN in those with distal HPs vs those with distal adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients with distal HPs have an intermediate risk of PN compared with those with distal adenomas or no distal polyps; however, in asymptomatic screening individuals, there is no increased risk of PN or proximal advanced neoplasia. The discovery of HPs on screening flexible sigmoidoscopy should not automatically prompt follow-up colonoscopy.     

Serum insulin levels and the prevalence of adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps in the proximal colon.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Obesity and diabetes mellitus are associated with an increased incidence of proximal colon cancer. Colonic adenoma that has been reported to be associated with elevated serum insulin levels and subsets of hyperplastic polyps might serve as a precursor of colon cancer. In this study, we sought to determine segment-specific associations between serum insulin levels and the prevalence of adenoma and hyperplastic polyps in the proximal and distal colon. METHODS: We studied 343 consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy in our hospital. All medical information, including fasting serum insulin, was obtained at colonoscopy. We performed multinomial logistic regression models by using the outcome categories of none (reference), proximal-only, distal-only, and both-segment lesions for the presence of adenoma/hyperplastic polyp with serum insulin, age, gender, lifestyle characteristics, and the presence of other types of lesions as predictors. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are provided for a 5-muU/mL increase in serum insulin. RESULTS: Overall, serum insulin levels were significantly associated with adenoma (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0; P = .005) and borderline associated with hyperplastic polyps (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7; P = .075). In multinomial logistic regression models, elevated serum insulin levels were significantly associated with proximal-only adenoma (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.5; P = .002), both-side hyperplastic polyp (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .015), and proximal-only hyperplastic polyp (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1; P = .048) and borderline associated with distal-only adenoma (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1; P =.059) but not with distal-only hyperplastic polyp. CONCLUSIONS: Serum insulin levels directly correlate with the presence of adenoma and hyperplastic polyps in the proximal colon and might also less strongly correlate with the presence of distal adenoma.     

Risk for colon adenomas in patients with rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hyperplastic polyps found in the rectosigmoid area of the colon are associated with proximal adenomas, and to judge whether patients with distal hyperplastic polyps found during sigmoidoscopy might benefit from full colonoscopy. DESIGN: Data on patients having colonoscopy collected prospectively according to a set protocol. The size and location of all polyps were noted, and all polyps were biopsied. SETTING: Two university hospitals. PATIENTS: One thousand eight hundred and thirty-six consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy between 31 December 1987 and 31 August 1989. RESULTS: Of the 970 patients who met eligibility requirements, 274 (28.3%) had adenomas and 108 (11.1%) had hyperplastic polyps. The proportion of patients with distal hyperplastic polyps and proximal adenomas (31.9%) was similar to the proportion of those without distal hyperplastic polyps (23.0%) (crude odds ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.77 to 3.06). After adjusting for age and sex, the results were unchanged (adjusted odds ratio, 1.53; CI, 0.82 to 2.88). Patients with distal adenomas, on the other hand, were three times more likely to have proximal adenomas than those without distal adenomas (adjusted odds ratio, 3.42; CI, 1.99 to 5.88). CONCLUSIONS: Distal hyperplastic polyps are not strong predictors of risk for proximal adenomas. Based on the magnitude of the risk difference, we do not believe that finding a hyperplastic polyp during sigmoidoscopy justifies doing a full colonoscopy to search for proximal adenomas. Because rectosigmoid adenomas are associated with proximal adenomas, however, small polyps seen during sigmoidoscopy should be biopsied to determine their type. Colonoscopy should be reserved for patients who are proved to have adenomas.     

Risk of proximal colorectal neoplasia among asymptomatic patients with distal hyperplastic polyps

PURPOSE: Many guidelines on colorectal cancer screening do not consider distal hyperplastic polyps to be a marker for proximal neoplasia. However, 11 of 17 published studies have shown an increased risk of proximal neoplasia in patients with distal hyperplastic polyps. Our goal is to assess the risk of proximal neoplasia in asymptomatic patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, compared to those with distal tubular adenomas or no distal polyps. METHODS: We assessed proximal (cecum, ascending, transverse colon and splenic flexure) and distal polyps in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy, classifying them into 3 groups: distal hyperplastic polyps only; distal adenomas with or without hyperplastic polyps; no distal polyps. The prevalence of proximal neoplasia and advanced neoplasia (polyps > or =1 cm, villous adenomas, or cancer) was compared among these groups. RESULTS: Of 2357 patients, 427 (18%) had neoplasia, including 103 (4%) with advanced neoplasia. Proximal neoplasia occurred in 175 (9%) of 1896 patients with no distal polyps, compared with 28 (12%) of 237 with distal hyperplastic polyps (P = 0.20) and 64 (29%) of 224 with distal adenomas (P <0.0001). Proximal advanced neoplasia occurred in 39 (2%) patients with no distal polyps, compared with 4 (2%) with distal hyperplastic polyps (P = 0.70) and 9 (4%) with distal adenomas (P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, unlike those with distal adenomas, do not exhibit an increased risk for proximal neoplasia or proximal advanced neoplasia compared to those with no distal polyps. The discovery of hyperplastic polyps on screening sigmoidoscopy should not prompt colonoscopy.     

Distal colonic hyperplastic polyps do not predict proximal adenomas in asymptomatic average-risk subjects.

The significance of distal colonic hyperplastic polyps was investigated in 482 asymptomatic average-risk subjects, aged 50-75 years, in whom fecal occult blood test results were negative and who underwent screening colonoscopy. The incidence of adenomas in the colon proximal to the sigmoid-descending colon junction in subjects with hyperplastic polyps distal to that point was 18% and was similar to the incidence of proximal colonic adenomas in subjects with no distal colonic polyps (15%). The incidence of proximal colonic adenomas in subjects with no distal colonic adenomas was 38% and was significantly greater than the incidence found in individuals with no distal colonic polyps or only hyperplastic polyps. Our data do not support distal colonic hyperplastic polyps as markers for proximal colonic adenomas in asymptomatic average-risk subjects.     

Carcinoma in gastric hyperplastic polyps

One-hundred twelve hyperplastic polyps were analyzed. The aim was to study their malignant transformation. Among them, four hyperplastic polyps harbored adenocarcinoma; two were from our own institution (1.8%). The majority were pedunculated and located in the antrum with an average of 14.5 mm in diameter. The four polyps bore well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia were detected in two and three polyps, respectively. The cancer and dysplastic foci shared the same type of neutral and acid mucosubstances. p53 oncoprotein was positive in three cancer foci and in the dysplastic areas, and nucleolar organizer region counts were higher in the cancer foci. In conclusion, hyperplastic polyps have malignant potential. Such possibility increases in polyps larger than 14.5 mm. In our cases, the carcinoma foci may have arisen from dysplastic areas. Once the neoplastic changes occur, the cancer cells proliferate and behave as other adenocarcinomas of the stomach.     

Two cases of inverted hyperplastic polyps of the colon and association with adenoma

Here we report two cases of inverted hyperplastic polyps of the colon. The first patient showed three inverted hyperplastic polyps in the ascending colon, one of which was associated with adenoma. We immunostained this adenoma-associated polyp using anti-beta-catenin antibody and found accumulation of beta-catenin in the cytoplasm of the adenomatous lesion but not in the inverted hyperplastic polyp. This suggested an adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutation in the adenomatous region but not in the inverted hyperplastic polyp. The inverted hyperplastic polyp in the second patient was located at the caecum and was studied using magnifying colonoscopy. The polyp appeared to be flat and elevated with a depressed pit in the centre. After spraying with methylene blue dye, the pit pattern of the lesion was observed and small asteroid pits on the polyp were found, consistent with a hyperplastic gland pattern. From these results, we diagnosed inverted hyperplastic polyp of the colon by colonoscopy.     

Diagnostic potential of near-infrared Raman spectroscopy in the colon: differentiating adenomatous from hyperplastic polyps

BACKGROUND: Near-infrared Raman spectroscopy is a promising optical technique for GI tissue diagnosis. This study assessed the diagnostic potential of near-infrared Raman spectroscopy in the colon by evaluating its ability to distinguish between adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps. METHODS: Ex vivo and in vivo Raman spectra of colon polyps were collected by using a custom-built, fiber-optic, near-infrared Raman spectroscopic system. Multivariate statistical techniques, including principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis, were used to develop diagnostic algorithms for classifying colon polyps based on their spectral characteristics. With the number of samples available, spectral classification of polyps was tested by using a leave-one-out, cross-validation method. RESULTS: Fifty-four ex vivo Raman spectra were analyzed (20 hyperplastic, 34 adenomatous). The spectral-based diagnostic algorithms identified adenomatous polyps with 91% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and 93% accuracy. In vivo, adenomas (n = 10) were distinguished from hyperplastic polyps (n = 9) with 100% sensitivity, 89% specificity, and 95% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Near-infrared Raman spectroscopy differentiated adenomatous from hyperplastic polyps with high diagnostic accuracy. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of the potential of near-infrared Raman spectroscopy for differentiation of colonic polyps during GI endoscopy.     

Prevalence and incidence of hyperplastic polyps and adenomas in familial colorectal cancer: correlation between the two types of colon polyps

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colorectal adenomas are recognised as precursors of colorectal carcinomas. The significance of hyperplastic (metaplastic) colorectal polyps is unknown. The relationship between hyperplastic polyps and adenomas, and the prevalence and incidence of these lesions were evaluated in individuals predisposed to familial colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 299 individuals participating in our surveillance programme during 1990-2000 were retrospectively evaluated. Subjects were classified into three groups: hereditary non-polyposis syndrome (HNPCC) (n=108), hereditary colorectal cancer (HCRC) (n=127), and individuals with empirical risk estimates-two close relatives (TCR) (n=64). Findings from 780 colonoscopies were evaluated regarding prevalence and incidence of hyperplastic polyps and adenomas. Correlations between hyperplastic polyps and adenomas were calculated by Pearson correlation. RESULTS: In total, 292 hyperplastic polyps and 186 adenomas were observed in 98 and 90 individuals, respectively. A positive correlation was found between the numbers of hyperplastic polyps and adenomas (r=0.40; p<0.001). Correlations between adenomas and hyperplastic polyps were similar in the three groups. The risk of detecting new hyperplastic polyps (odds ratio 5.41) or adenomas (OR 2.56) increased significantly when there was a positive finding at first colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Hyperplastic polyps as well as adenomas may identify individuals with a high risk of colorectal cancer. This information is important when these individuals are selected and included in tailored surveillance programmes.     

Colorectal hyperplastic polyps and risk of recurrence of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Polyps Prevention Study

We examined data from two large colorectal chemoprevention trials for possible associations of hyperplastic polyps and adenomas with subsequent development of these lesions. Hyperplastic polyps do not predict metachronous adenomas.     

Colon adenomas in patients with hyperplastic polyps

Although hyperplastic polyps are generally believed to have no malignant potential, recent work has suggested that they might be more common in patients with adenomas. We evaluated whether hyperplastic polyps could serve as a marker for patients who might benefit from colonoscopy. We retrospectively reviewed 1,588 consecutive colonoscopy reports and hospital charts on 1,407 different patients examined between May 1983 and August 1985: 242 patients had adenomas, and 94 had hyperplastic polyps. Of patients with hyperplastic polyps 93.6% had concomitant adenomas, as compared with 35.7% of those without, p less than 0.001. Adenomas proximal to the rectosigmoid were found in 61.7% of patients with hyperplastic polyps and in 25.3% of those without, p less than 0.001. Patients with hyperplastic polyps in the rectosigmoid had proximal adenomas more frequently (64.7%) than did those without rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps (29.4%), p less than 0.001. We conclude that patients with hyperplastic polyps are more likely to have adenomas, and patients with rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps are more likely to have proximal adenomas. Based on these preliminary data, we believe that the finding of hyperplastic polyps in the rectosigmoid might justify full colonoscopy and that this should be studied further.     

Pressure dye-spray: a simple and reliable method for differentiating adenomas from hyperplastic polyps in the colon

BACKGROUND: Based on 10 years of experience with chromoendoscopy, our hypothesis was that colonic adenomas can be differentiated from hyperplastic polyps by use of a high-pressure spray-jet of dye (pressure dye-spray). To test the accuracy of pressure dye-spray, classification of colonic polyps as adenomas and hyperplastic polyps by pressure dye-spray and ordinary colonoscopic findings (shape, size, and color surface appearance) were compared. METHODS: Pressure dye-spray chromoendoscopy was performed by using 0.035% indigo carmine, a spray-type cannula, and a water pump. Polyps were first classified as adenomas or hyperplastic polyps by ordinary colonoscopic findings. One or more pressure dye-spray bursts were then focused on the polyp from a distance of 1 to 2 cm. Polyps were classified as adenomas only if oozing of blood was evident; otherwise, they were classified as hyperplastic polyps. A histologic diagnosis was obtained for all polyps, and the results of ordinary colonoscopic findings and pressure dye-spray were compared. RESULTS: This study examined 1468 polyps (1201 adenomas, 267 hyperplastic polyps; mean diameter 4 mm). The sensitivities for polyp differentiation with pressure dye-spray and ordinary colonoscopic findings were, respectively, 97.9% and 73.4% (p < 0.0001); specificities were, respectively, 96.6% and 92.1% (p = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: Pressure dye-spray was found to be a reliable technique for differentiation between adenomas and hyperplastic polyps.