Tissue proliferation within and surrounding Palmaz-Schatz stents is dependent on the aggressiveness of stent implantation technique

In-stent restenosis is entirely due to intimal hyperplasia. Histologic studies have indicated that intimal hyperplasia is related to the arterial injury induced during stent implantation. We used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging to study whether tissue proliferation inside and surrounding stents is related to the aggressiveness of the implantation technique. After intervention and follow-up (mean 5.6 +/- 3.7 months), serial IVUS imaging was performed in 102 native artery stented stenoses in 91 patients. Measurements at 5 predetermined segments within each stented lesion included external elastic membrane, stent, and lumen cross-sectional areas (CSAs). Calculations included mean plaque CSA growth outside of the stent (external elastic membrane-stent) and mean neointimal hyperplasia CSA and thickness within the stent (stent-lumen). Stenoses were categorized depending on the aggressiveness of stent placement (group 1, adjunct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty pressure < 16 atm and/or balloon/artery ratio < 1.1; group 2, adjunct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty pressure > or = 16 atm and balloon/artery ratio > or = 1.1). An aggressiveness score was calculated as balloon/artery ratio x inflation pressure. Mean intimal hyperplasia CSA (2.9 +/- 1.5 vs 2.2 +/- 1.6 mm2, p = 0.028), mean intimal hyperplasia thickness (0.34 +/- 0.19 vs 0.25 +/- 0.19 mm, p = 0.012), and mean peristent tissue growth CSA (2.5 +/- 1.0 vs 1.1 +/- 1.4 mm2, p = 0.003) were significantly greater in group 2 stenoses. In addition, intimal hyperplasia CSA and thickness correlated significantly with balloon/artery ratio x inflation pressures: r = 0.305, p = 0.002 and r = 0.329, p = 0.0007, respectively, as did peristent tissue proliferation CSA (r = 0.466, p = 0.001). Tissue proliferation inside and surrounding stents may be related to aggressiveness of the stent implantation technique.     

Expansion of the Multilink-Tristar stent after direct implantation and predilatation: comparison of clinical,angiography and intravascular ultrasound parameters

Coronary stenting has become the primary therapeutic option for many coronary lesions. As opposed to conventional stenting the advantages of direct stenting are a reduction of procedural time, radiation exposure and costs. However, data about the incidence of in-stent restenosis are so far not available. It was the aim of this prospective study to compare the expansion of the Multilink stent after direct stenting and predilatation by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Between January 2000 and June 2001, 82 patients were assigned to direct stenting (46 lesions) or predilatation (40 lesions) in lesions of coronary arteries > 3 mm. The procedural success rate was 92% in patients undergoing direct stenting. The baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. The comparison of the angiographic data shows that direct stenting was performed in lesions with a lower degree of stenosis (71 +/- 12% vs 79 +/- 11%, p = 0.01) and that significantly shorter stents were used (14.4 +/- 3.0 vs 17.8 +/- 4.1 mm, p = 0.0007). The mean stenosis length was not significantly different in either group (10.5 +/- 3.4 vs 11.7 +/- 4.3 mm, n.s.). The QCA data after stent implantation show no differences of either implantation technique. Stent expansion was assessed by IVUS estimation of the proximal, distal and minimal in stent area. The minimal in-stent area (9.53 +/- 3.23, mm2 vs 8.65 +/- 1.96 mm2, n.s.) and the stent symmetry index (0.88 vs 0.88 n.s.) were not different in either patient group. These results indicate that in this subset of selected coronary lesions > 3 mm, elective stent implantation with and without predilatation effectively can achieve comparable stent expansion as assessed by QCA and IVUS. In comparison to conventional stent implantation stents, which were implanted without predilatation, were significantly shorter to cover the same lesion length.     

An intravascular ultrasound study of Cypher, Taxus, and endeavor stents on relation between neointimal proliferation and residual plaque burden

Background: Studies on balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, and bare metal stent have shown a direct relation between residual plaque burden and restenosis. We investigated the relation between residual plaque burden and neointimal proliferation after drug‐eluting stent (DES) implantation. Methods: Over a period of 12 months, 65 patients (Cypher, n = 25; Taxus, n = 28; Endeavor, n = 12) from two centers underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination at 8.2 (interquartile range 6.8–9.5) months after coronary stent implantation in native de novo coronary arteries. IVUS images were acquired with motorized pullback at 0.5 mm/s, and cross‐sectional measurements were performed within the stents at 1‐mm intervals. The following measurements were obtained: (1) lumen area (LA), (2) stent area (SA), (3) external elastic membrane area (EEMA), (4) percent neointimal hyperplasia area (SA‐LA/SA) × 100, and (5) percent residual plaque area (EEMA‐SA)/EEMA × 100. Results: The analysis of 1,173 cross sections (Cypher, n = 436; Taxus, n = 532, Endeavor, n = 205) using mixed model to account for intrasubject correlation showed an absence of relation between percent residual plaque area and percent neointimal hyperplasia area (P = 0.189). Mean residual plaque burden outside the stent for Cypher, Taxus, and Endeavor groups was similar (45.7%, 44.8%, and 42.4%, respectively). Mean percent neointimal hyperplasia area for the Cypher, Taxus, and Endeavor groups was 12.0%, 15.0%, and 16.2%, respectively (P = 0.163). Conclusion: In patients after first‐generation DES implantation and without significant in‐stent restenosis, late in‐stent neointimal proliferation is not related to the amount of residual plaque burden after stent implantation. This suggests against routine plaque removal before DES implantation to reduce neointimal proliferation.     

Direct coronary stent implantation without predilatation--a new therapeutic approach with a special balloon catheter design

Stent implantation serves as the gold standard for proximal lesions of the coronary arteries with a diameter between 2.75-3.5 mm. Our new concept aims at a reduced procedure duration and fluoro-time as well as a decreased ischemic period during stent implantation. A new therapeutic concept of a direct stent implantation without predilatation was tested using a specially developed balloon catheter on which various 14-16 mm long "slotted-tube" stents are mounted between two conical, radiopaque markers. In 105 consecutive patients, who were scheduled for angioplasty, this method of direct stent implantation was performed. Six of the procedures were performed for acute myocardial infarction and 8 in so-called high-risk procedures. The direct stent implantation was successful in 88%. In 6%, predilatation of the lesion site was necessary before stent placement. In the remaining 6%, a stent could not be successfully implanted despite the availability of various other systems. Comparison of the direct stent implantation with conventional stent placement with predilatation revealed that 1) The fluoro-time for direct stent implantation, compared to the conventional method, was 8.4 +/- 4.9 min vs. 13.7 +/- 8.0 min; p < 0.05, respectively. Furthermore, there were less balloons used per lesion for direct stent implantation (1.4 +/- 0.4) compared to the conventional method (1.7 +/- 0.7), but there was not a significant difference. 2) If we compare those patients with successful direct stent implantation with those with the unsuccessful procedures, the latter group had a higher percent of angiographically visible calcification at the site of the lesion (80% vs. 18%; p < 0.01). In addition, these patients had an increased average age (72 +/- 7 vs. 61 +/- 11 yrs; p < 0.01). The success rate of direct stent implantation did not depend on lesion diameter stenosis before PTCA. Stent dislocation was observed in 3.8% of the procedures, and a single case of stent embolism was seen. In conclusion, the direct stent implantation offers the advantages of a shortened fluoro-time, the use of fewer balloons, and has the potential of less ischemic stress compared to the conventional method of stent implantation with predilatation, if old patients with calcified lesions are excluded. This should be proved on a large scale in future studies also considering a learning curve with regard to the new method. Whether this new approach also reduces the restenosis rate, warrants further studies.     

Long-term follow-up after angiographically successful coronary stenting: direct stent versus conventional stent implantation

The purpose of the study was to compare the impacts of angiographically successful direct stent implantation and conventional stent implantation (stent implantation following predilatation) on long-term major cardiac events. The authors prospectively studied 40 patients who had successful direct stent implantation and 46 patients who had successful conventional stent implantation. The end-point of the study was defined as the occurrence of a major cardiac event, including recurrent angina, acute myocardial infarction, death, and target vessel revascularization. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study groups were similar, except the indication of percutaneous angioplasty, which was more frequently unstable angina in the conventional stent group (63% vs 38%, P: 0.03). Procedural minor complications were more frequent in conventional stent implantation, and there was also a positive correlation between the conventional stent implantation and procedural minor complications (r = 0.231, P: 0.03), and postprocedural troponin elevation (r = 0.221, P: 0.04). The incidences of major cardiac events including recurrent angina, acute myocardial infarction, death, death or myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization were not different between the study groups during the long-term follow-up period (21 +/- 7.1 months for direct stent group and 20 +/- 7.5 months for conventional stent group). Overall end-points occurred in 9 patients (22%) in the direct stent group and in 9 patients (19%) in the conventional stent group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there was no difference in event-free survival between the patients treated with direct stent implantation and conventional stent implantation (log-rank: 1.52, P = 0.21). Two-vessel intervention and hypertension were found to be related with long-term major cardiac events (r = 0.214, P: 0.048, r = 0.206, P: 0.04, respectively). In addition to the procedural advantages, direct stent implantation may also provide comparable results with conventional stent implantation concerning the late cardiac events following successful percutaneous coronary angioplasty.     

Neointima in coronary stent does not increase during over 1-year in non-restenosed lesion at 6 months follow-up: serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound study

The long-term outcomes of coronary artery stenting have been determined by coronary angiography only with has the limitation of determining stent expansion and neointimal proliferation at long-term follow-up. Volumetric intravascular analysis has the potential to evaluate the morphology and distribution of neointima longitudinally after coronary artery stenting. We used three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (3-D IVUS) to evaluate serial changes in stent and neointimal volumes for over 1-year in 9 patients who did not exhibit angiographic restenosis at 6-month follow-up. Volumetric analysis by a validated Netra 3-D IVUS system was performed pre- and post-intervention, at 6-month follow-up (FU1), and at over one-year follow-up (FU2). Lumen volume in the stented lesions increased significantly after intervention, and the increase persisted until FU2. There were no significant changes in stent volume between just after stent implantation and at FU2. Neointimal volume within the stents did not change from FUI to FU2 (FU1; 38.4 +/- 9.0 mm3 vs FU2; 33.8 +/- 10.3 mm3). In 33% (3/9) of all lesions, neointimal volume increased between from 6-months to over 1-year after stent implantation. Neointimal distribution after stenting seemed to be almost equal and unrelated to the plaque burden at pre-intervention. Neointimal volume within the stents did not increase and stent volume did not change over the 1st-year in patients who did not exhibit angiographic restenosis at 6-months.     

The effect of paclitaxel-eluting stents on restenosis]

OBJECTIVE: In our study we aimed to investigate the effects of paclitaxel-eluting stent on restenosis. METHODS: Sixteen porcine were randomly assigned to two groups (n=8 per group): control group animals received conventional stent implantation and study group animals -paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation. Both groups were treated with 300 mg acetylsalicylic acid and 75 mg clopidogrel daily. The degree of neointimal proliferation and effect of drug-eluting stent on restenosis were evaluated 6 weeks after by angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). RESULTS: Angiographic in-stent restenosis was lower in paclitaxel-eluting stent group (12.50 +/- 7.07% versus 41.25 +/- 28.50%, p=0.001). The IVUS data demonstrated that paclitaxel group animals had larger minimal lumen area (8.76 +/- 1.09 mm2 versus 6.23 +/- 3.10 mm2, p=0.028), smaller mean neointimal proliferation area (1.03 +/- 0.75 mm2 versus 3.55 +/- 2.86 mm2, p=0.01) and mean percent stenosis (10.71 +/- 8.10% versus 36.85 +/- 30.93%, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that drug-eluting stents may also have a preventive effect for the in-stent restenosis.     

Morphological effects on in-stent restenosis assessed by intravascular ultrasound imaging.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rupture and dissection of the vessel wall immediately after balloon dilatation by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging and to predict restenosis in patients who underwent subsequent coronary stent implantation. Stent implantation improves the long-term results of coronary angioplasty by reducing lesion elastic recoil and arterial remodeling. However, several studies have suggested that neointimal hyperplasia is the cause of instant restenosis. We recruited 60 patients in whom IVUS studies were performed immediately after successful balloon dilatation and just before stent implantation. We compared IVUS parameters with 6-month follow-up quantitative coronary angiography. This was performed in 51 lesions of 51 patients (85%). Qualitative analysis included assessment of plaque composition, plaque eccentricity, plaque fracture and the presence of dissection. In addition, minimal luminal diameter, percent diameter stenosis, percent area stenosis and plaque burden were quantitatively analyzed. Two morphological patterns after balloon dilatation were classified by IVUS. Type I was defined as absence or partial tear of the plaque without disclosure of the media to lumen (22 lesions). Type II was defined as a split in the plaque or dissection of the vessel wall with disclosure of the media to the lumen (29 lesions). At 6 months follow-up, angiographic restenosis occurred in 17 of the 51 lesions (33%). Restenosis was significantly (p < 0.05) more likely to occur in type II (13/29: 45% incidence) than in type I (4/22: 18% incidence). The assessment of plaque morphology immediately after balloon dilatation and before stent implantation provides important therapeutic and prognostic implications.     

Comparison of myocardial fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound for the assessment of slotted-tube stents.

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been reported to provide similar results for assessment of coil stent deployment. Their relative value in slotted-tube stents has not been investigated. Fourteen patients subjected to coronary angioplasty and IVUS-guided elective stenting with a slotted-tube stent underwent IVUS assessment and FFR measurement following stent implantation at inflation pressures of 12 and 18 atm. FFR values (mean +/- SD) preangioplasty, postangioplasty, and poststenting at 12 atm and 18 atm, were 0.58 +/- 0.07, 0.83 +/- 0.05, 0.94 +/- 0.02, and 0.94 +/- 0.02, respectively. After inflation at 12 atm, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the concordance of IVUS and FFR measurements was 0.89 (P = 0.02). Six patients had either an abnormal IVUS (n = 2) or FFR < 0.94 (n = 1) or both abnormal IVUS and FFR < 0.94 (n = 3) after the first inflation and had a second inflation at 18 atm. The area under the ROC curve for the concordance between IVUS and FFR final measurements was 0.855 (P = 0.10). Perfect concordance between IVUS and FFR was seen only for FFR values less than 0.91 or larger than 0.94. Overall, IVUS and FFR have substantial concordance with respect to slotted-tube stent deployment. However, FFR values between 0.91 and 0.94 after inflation are difficult to interpret.     

Relation of atherothrombosis burden and volume detected by intravascular ultrasound to angiographic no-reflow phenomenon during stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction

This study investigated the mechanism of occurrence of the no-reflow phenomenon during stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with volumetric analysis. Of 70 patients with AMI who underwent IVUS-guided stent implantation within 24 hours of symptom onset, 12 developed decreased Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade during stent implantation and without subsequent restoration to Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade before stenting. External elastic membrane cross-sectional area and maximum diameter at the culprit lesion as measured by IVUS before stent implantation were significantly larger in the no-reflow group (n = 12) than in the normal reflow group (n = 58; 20.1 +/- 6.5 vs 16.4 +/- 4.3 mm2, p = 0.015 for cross-sectional area and 5.2 +/- 0.9 vs 4.8 +/- 0.6 mm, p = 0.049 for maximum diameter). Plaque volume, volumetric plaque burden (plaque volume/external elastic membrane volume), and change in plaque volume during stent implantation (plaque volume after vs before) were significantly greater in the no-reflow group than in the normal reflow group (239 +/- 142 vs 178 +/- 72 mm3, p = 0.030; 0.76 +/- 0.07 vs 0.71 +/- 0.06, p = 0.010; and -46 +/- 63 vs -11 +/- 37 mm3, p = 0.013, respectively). In conclusion, high atherothrombotic burden and decreased plaque volume as detected by IVUS may be risk factors for development of the no-reflow phenomenon during stent implantation in patients with AMI.     

Neointimal hyperplasia after stenting in a human mammary artery organ culture

Although the use of stents has limited the incidence of restenosis, in-stent restenosis remains an important problem. In-stent restenosis is the result of a healing process that induced neointimal hyperplasia through mechanisms that are still not understood. The aim of this study was to analyze the histological consequences of the healing process following stent implantation. Internal mammary arteries from atheroslerotic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were stented and maintained in culture for 0-28 days. Stent implantation after predilatation induced an extensive loss of endothelial cells whereas direct stenting preserved endothelium between the struts. Morphometric analysis shows that stent placement induced neointimal thickening. Smooth muscle alpha-actin labeling indicates that neo-intimal formation was mainly due to proliferation and migration of smooth muscle cells. Smooth muscle cell proliferation, assessed by MIB-1 staining, was maximal at day 14 after stent insertion. Human mammary artery organ culture thus provides valuable information on histological consequences of stent implantation with or without predilatation regarding endothelial cell disappearance and neointimal hyperplasia. These data also demonstrate that neointimal thickening induced by stent implantation comprises an intrinsic component resulting from the vessel wall response to stent insertion and suggest that blood factors could play an amplifying but not necessary role.     

Effect of probucol on neointimal thickening in a stent porcine restenosis model

Restenosis after stent deployment remains a major clinical problem. Antioxidants have been proposed as a promising strategy against restenosis. We tested the antioxidant probucol for its efficacy against neointimal hyperplasia in porcine coronary arteries after stent implantation. Probucol was then tested in vivo in 8 coronary arteries of 4 pigs (1000 mg/day orally beginning 7 days before stenting) and was compared to placebo (10 coronary arteries, 5 pigs) 28 days after stenting. Quantitative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) revealed 38.8 +/- 4.0 versus 40.1 +/- 3.0% area stenosis in the probucol versus control group. Histopathologic assessment showed that probucol had no beneficial effect on inhibiting the neointimal proliferative response in stent lesions compared to placebo (2.35 +/- 0.26 versus 2.88 +/- 0.25 mm(2)), despite similar injury scores (1.20 +/- 0.12 versus 1.28 +/- 0.14). An edge segment (axially 2-mm proximal to the stent margins) was assessed by IVUS. Remodeling index, which is a good marker of constrictive remodeling, was defined by the ratio of the vessel area in the lesion site (stent edge) to the vessel area in the proximal reference site (6-mm proximal to the stent margins). The remodeling index was significantly larger in the probucol group that in the placebo group (1.18 +/- 0.10 versus 0.90 +/- 0.06, P = 0.0012). In conclusion, probucol reduced constrictive remodeling at the edge of the implant but did not inhibit the tissue response within the stent.     

Thiazolidinedione treatment attenuates diffuse neointimal hyperplasia in restenotic lesions after coronary stent implantation in type 2 diabetic patients: an intravascular ultrasound study

OBJECTIVES: Thiazolidinedione treatment reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in diabetic patients. However, in-stent restenosis still persists in patients treated with thiazolidinedione. The effect of thiazolidinedione treatment on the pattern of in-stent restenosis remains unclear. This study investigated whether thiazolidinedione treatment attenuates diffuse neointimal hyperplasia in restenotic lesions after coronary stent implantation in diabetic patients. METHODS: Volumetric intravascular ultrasound was performed at 6 months after coronary stent implantation in 76 patients with restenotic lesions who received either conventional anti-diabetic treatment (control group, n = 56) or thiazolidinedione treatment (thiazolidinedione group, n = 20). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in stent volume (99 +/- 32 vs 90 +/- 20 mm3, respectively, p = 0.26) or in minimal lumen area in the stent (1.4 +/- 0.6 vs 1.6 +/- 0.5 mm2, respectively, p = 0.11). However, there were significant reductions in neointimal volume (56 +/- 25 vs 36 +/- 11 mm3, respectively, p < 0.01)and neointimal index (56 +/- 11% vs 41 +/- 8%, respectively, p < 0.01) in the thiazolidinedione group. Coefficient of variation of neointimal tissue accumulation was greater in the thiazolidinedione group (45.5%) than in the control group (25.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound study demonstrated that together with reduction of overall neointimal tissue proliferation, thiazolidinedione treatment caused greater point-to-point heterogeneity in the neointimal tissue accumulation in restenotic lesions after coronary stent implantation. This finding strongly suggests that thiazolidinedione treatment attenuates diffuse in-stent restenosis in diabetic patients.     

Is the “candy‐wrapper” effect of 32P radioactive β‐emitting stents due to remodeling or neointimal hyperplasia?: Insights from Intravascular Ultrasound

A recognized limitation of radioactive stents is the development of restenosis at the stent edges, known as the "candy-wrapper" effect. The mechanisms of this effect remain incompletely understood and controversial. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of endovascular irradiation on neointima formation and vascular remodeling. (32)P Palmaz-Schatz stents (1.5-4 microCi) were implanted in 11 patients with restenosis after previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images of target sites and adjunct vessel segments were acquired both during intervention and after 6 months. The angiographic restenosis rate was 54%, and the MLD decreased from 2.21 +/- 0.6 mm to 1.38 +/- 0.4 mm at follow-up (P < 0.01). IVUS analysis demonstrated that late lumen loss was the result of neointimal tissue proliferation, which was nonuniformly distributed and exaggerated at both the central articulation and the distal stent edges. Negative remodeling did not contribute to restenosis. In contrast, we found a linear relationship between increase of area stenosis and a positive remodeling index (r = 0.84, P < 0.0001). Restenosis after implantation of (32)P Palmaz-Schatz stents was mainly the result of neointimal tissue proliferation which tended to be nonuniformly distributed in the stent articulation and edges. Negative remodeling or stent recoil was not observed. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;54:41-48.     

Polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents reduce in-stent neointimal tissue proliferation: a serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS-IV trial

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to use serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to evaluate the effects of polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stents on in-stent neointima formation and late incomplete stent apposition. BACKGROUND: The TAXUS-IV trial demonstrated that the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent reduces angiographic restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization procedures. Serial IVUS studies reveal details of the pattern of vascular responses provoked by stent implantation that provide insight into device safety and efficacy. METHODS: In the TAXUS-IV trial, patients were randomized to the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent or a bare-metal EXPRESS stent (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts). As part of a formal substudy, complete volumetric IVUS data were available in 170 patients, including 88 TAXUS patients and 82 controls, at implantation and at nine-month follow-up. RESULTS: No baseline differences were present in the clinical characteristics or IVUS parameters between the control and TAXUS groups. At nine-month follow-up, IVUS lumen volumes were larger in the TAXUS group (123 +/- 43 mm(3) vs. 104 +/- 44 mm(3), p = 0.005), due to a reduction in neointimal volume (18 +/- 18 mm(3) vs. 41 +/- 23 mm(3), p < 0.001). Millimeter-by-millimeter analysis within the stent demonstrated uniform suppression of neointimal growth along the entire stent length. Late lumen loss was similar at the proximal edge of the stent between the two groups, and reduced with the TAXUS stent at the distal edge (p = 0.004). Incomplete stent apposition at nine months was observed in only 3.0% of control and 4.0% of TAXUS stents (p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stents are effective in inhibiting neointimal tissue proliferation, and do not result in late incomplete stent apposition.     

Low-molecular-weight heparin reduces neointimal proliferation after coronary stent implantation in hypercholesterolemic minipigs.

BACKGROUND. Intracoronary stents have been suggested as a method of reducing the restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty. Proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells is a major contributing factor to the restenosis process. Heparin and some of its derivatives have been shown to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation. We investigated the effect of low-molecular-weight heparin on the proliferative response after implantation of a balloon-expandable tantalum stent in previously deendothelialized coronary artery segments of hypercholesterolemic minipigs. METHODS AND RESULTS. Minipigs were fed a diet containing 2% cholesterol, starting 1 month before balloon denudation of the endothelium in a coronary artery. One month later, a stent was implanted at this site. Animals were killed after 4 weeks (group 1, n = 6) or 3 months (group 2, n = 6). Animals in group 3 (n = 6), also followed for 4 weeks after stenting, received subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin at a dose of 200-300 units/kg anti-factor Xa activity per day in addition to the chronic acetylsalicylic acid (100 mg/day) also administered to groups 1 and 2. Eighteen of 22 animals survived to the end of the study. Angiography revealed patent stents in all surviving animals. In group 1, histological analysis showed extensive neointimal proliferation around stent struts. Maximal neointimal thickness seen in group 1 averaged 0.93 +/- 0.11 mm, was lower after 3 months (0.8 +/- 0.14 mm) in group 2, but was significantly reduced (0.44 +/- 0.18 mm, p less than 0.01) in group 3. CONCLUSIONS. These data show a significant reduction of the neointimal proliferative response to coronary stent implantation by low-molecular-weight heparin.     

Effects of gold coating of coronary stents on neointimal proliferation following stent implantation

Experimental studies suggest a reduced neointimal tissue proliferation in vascular stainless steel stents coated with gold. This prospective multicenter trial evaluated the impact of gold coating on neointimal tissue proliferation in patients undergoing elective stent implantation. The primary end point was the in-stent tissue proliferation measured by intravascular ultrasound at 6 months comparing stents of identical design with or without gold coating (Inflow). Two hundred four patients were randomized to receive uncoated (group A, n = 101) or coated (group B, n = 103) stents. Baseline parameters did not differ between the groups. Stent length and balloon size were comparable, whereas inflation pressure was slightly higher in group A (14 +/- 3 vs 13 +/- 3 atm, p = 0.013). Procedural success was similar (A, 97%; B, 96%). The acute angiographic result was better for group B (remaining stenosis 4 +/- 12% vs 10 +/- 11%, p = 0.002). Six-month examinations revealed more neointimal proliferation in group B. By ultrasound, the neointimal volume within the stent was 47 +/- 25 versus 41 +/- 23 mm(3) (p = 0.04), with a ratio of neointimal volume-to-stent volume of 0.45 +/- 0.12 versus 0.40 +/- 0.12 (p = 0.003). The angiographic minimal luminal diameter was smaller in group B (1.47 +/- 0.57 vs 1.69 +/- 0.70 mm, p = 0.04), with a higher late luminal loss of 1.17 +/- 0.51 versus 0.82 +/- 0.56 mm (p = 0.001). Thus, gold coating of the tested stent type resulted in more neointimal tissue proliferation.     

Direct versus conventional stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome just before the era of drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND: Direct stent implantation in patients, who undergo elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be performed with a high success rate and clinical results that are comparable to those after predilatation. It was the aim of this prospective study to compare clinical, angiographic and procedural parameter of direct stent implantation (DS) and conventional stent implantation (CS) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 194 patients with ACS (ST-elevation myocardial infarction 66%, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction 18%, unstable angina 16%), in whom primary PCI was performed between January and December 2002. In 156 (80%) patients glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered during the procedure. In 73 patients (38%) direct stent implantation could be performed successfully. In 12 patients (6%) direct stent implantation failed due to the inability to pass the stenosis. In 121 patients (62%) the stent was implanted after predilatation. RESULTS: The clinical parameters were comparable in both groups. Reference luminal diameter before stent implantation did not differ in both groups (DS 3.01+/-0.54 vs. CS 2.84+/-0.43 mm). The final minimal luminal diameter was significantly higher in the DS group (DS 2.95+/-0.45 vs. CS 2.77+/-0.47 mm, p=0.01). The procedural time (DS 41.0+/-14.1 vs. CS 46.8+/-16.9 min, p=0.02), radiation exposure time (DS 7.3+/-4.6 vs. CS 8.9+/-4.6 min, p=0.002) and the amount of contrast agent (DS 216+/-90 vs. CS 235+/-79 ml, p=0.03) could be decreased by the technique of direct stent implantation. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, CABG) during hospitalization was 4.1% in the DS group and 11.5% in the CS group (p=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Direct stent implantation is safe and feasible in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The procedural time, radiation exposure time and the amount of contrast agent can be significantly decreased using the technique of direct stent implantation. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events was not significantly different in this subset of patients.     

Comparison of paclitaxel-eluting stent and sirolimus-eluting stent expansion at incremental delivery pressures

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the adequacy of paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) expansion based on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging criteria at conventional delivery pressures. METHODS: Forty-six patients underwent SES implantation and 42 patients underwent PES implantation for de novo native coronary lesions<33 mm in length with reference lumen diameters of 2.5-3.5 mm. Stents were serially expanded with gradual balloon inflations at 14 and 20 atm. IVUS imaging was performed prior to intervention and after each balloon inflation. Stent expansion (minimal stent cross-sectional area/reference lumen cross-sectional area) was measured. Inadequate stent expansion was defined using the MUSIC criteria (all struts apposed, no tissue protrusion, and final lumen cross-sectional area>80% of the reference or >90% if minimal lumen cross-sectional area was <9 mm2). RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar except for shorter lesion length, larger mean lumen cross-sectional area, larger lumen diameter, and lower plaque burden in the PES group. Stent expansion was inadequate in 80% of patients with SES versus 63% of patients with PES at 14 atm, although this was not statistically significant. After 20 atm, 48% of patients with SES remained underexpanded as compared with 35% of patients with PES. CONCLUSION: Drug-eluting stents showed significant underexpansion by MUSIC criteria at conventionally used inflation pressures. Higher balloon inflations are required especially during deployment of a SES. IVUS guidance is recommended to ensure optimal results and outcomes with both stents.     

The impact of high pressure vs low pressure stent implantation on intimal hyperplasia and follow-up lumen dimensions; results of a randomized trial.

AIMS: Histology and retrospective clinical studies have indicated that the amount of neointimal hyperplasia is dependent on the arterial injury induced during stent implantation. This study analysed, prospectively, the impact of high vs low pressure stent implantation techniques using a second generation stent on intimal hyperplasia and follow-up lumen dimensions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Post-intervention and follow-up (mean[+/-SD] 5.5+/-1.3 months) angiographic and intravascular ultrasound studies were performed on 120 Multi-Link HP stents randomized to implantation at either low (8-10 atm) or high (16-20 atm) pressure. Intravascular ultrasound measurements of the external elastic membrane, stent, and lumen cross-sectional area were performed at 1 mm axial increments. Peri-stent plaque+media cross-sectional area (external elastic membrane-stent cross-sectional area, intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area (stent-lumen cross-sectional area at follow-up), intimal hyperplasia thickness and peri-stent tissue growth cross-sectional area (Deltapersistent plaque+media cross-sectional area) were calculated. Intravascular ultrasound demonstrated a larger minimal lumen cross-sectional area post-intervention in the high pressure group (7.3+/-2.0 vs 6.2+/-1.8 mm(2), P<0.001, high vs low pressure group, respectively). At follow-up, the mean intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area (1.7+/-0.9 vs 1.5+/-0.8 mm(2), P=0.708), the mean intimal hyperplasia thickness (0.16+/-0.12 vs 0.16+/-0.12 mm, P=0.818) and peri-stent tissue proliferation cross-sectional area were not greater in the high pressure group. Thus, the minimal lumen cross-sectional area at follow-up continued to be greater (5.5+/-2.0 vs 4.7+/-1.7 mm(2), P=0.038) in the high pressure group. CONCLUSIONS: High pressure stent implantation results in greater stent expansion even with the less rigid second generation Multi-Link stent. Larger lumen dimensions persist at follow-up, while intimal hyperplasia is not significantly greater after high pressure implantation compared to the low pressure technique.