Which antihypertensive drugs are the most nephroprotective and why?

Importance of the field: Hypertension is a major independent risk factor for kidney disease and for faster renal function loss. Choice of antihypertensive strategies with highest nephroprotective effect is crucial to prevent or reverse progression to end stage renal disease (ESRD).

Areas covered in this review: The present review focuses on the role of hypertension in the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), the renoprotective effects of different antihypertensive therapies, and the blood pressure levels that should be targeted in different patient populations. To this end, the PubMed (1975 – 2010) database was searched for English-language articles, using the following keywords: hypertension, kidney disease, ACE-inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, aldosterone antagonist, renin inhibitor, proteinuria.

What the reader will gain: A comprehensive review of data on the association between hypertension and progression of chronic nephropathies and on the antihypertensive treatments with highest nephroprotective effects.

Take home message: Blood pressure should be targeted to 140/90 mmHg or less in patients with hypertension but no renal injury and 130/80 mmHg or less in those with CKD. Amongst different antihypertensive drugs, renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors have an incremental nephroprotective effect in proteinuric patients. Maximal RAAS inhibition should be aimed to optimize renoprotection in hypertensive patients with CKD and proteinuria.     

Candesartan cilexetil – a review of effects on cardiovascular complications in hypertension and chronic heart failure

ABSTRACT

Therapeutic interventions that block the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) have an important role in slowing the progression of cardiovascular risk factors to established cardiovascular diseases. In recent years, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have emerged as effective and well-tolerated alternatives to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) for RAAS blockade. The ARB candesartan was initially established as an effective once-daily antihypertensive treatment, providing 24?h blood pressure (BP) control with a trough:peak ratio close to 100%.

Scope: A Medline literature search was undertaken to identify randomised, controlled trials that examined the efficacy and cardiovascular outcomes associated with candesartan cilexetil in hypertension and chronic heart failure (CHF).

Findings: Compared with other ARBs, candesartan demonstrates the strongest binding affinity to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. Clinical trials have demonstrated that candesartan is well tolerated in combination with diuretics or calcium channel blockers (CCBs), making it a suitable treatment option for patients whose hypertension is not adequately controlled by monotherapy. Subsequently, candesartan became the only ARB licensed in the UK to treat patients with CHF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% as add-on therapy to an ACEi or when an ACEi is not tolerated. Studies in patients with symptomatic HF have indicated that candesartan treatment was associated with significant relative risk reductions in cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation due to CHF.

Conclusions: There are clear indications that the clinical benefits of candesartan may extend beyond its proven antihypertensive effects to a wider range of complica­tions across the cardiovascular continuum, including diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, atherosclerosis and stroke. Such results suggest that candesartan treatment may offer significant patient benefits as well as practical advantages over conventional treatment.     

Is there a future for direct renin inhibitors?

Importance of the field: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a key regulator of blood pressure (BP), as well as volume and electrolytes, in both hypertensive and normotensive individuals. Inappropriate activation of the RAAS is important in hypertension-induced cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Renin is the rate-limiting step in the RAAS cascade, which makes direct renin inhibitors (DRIs) an attractive target for RAAS suppression and treatment of hypertension. Current regimens using either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) result in feedback upregulation of renin and aldosterone breakthrough, which contribute to incomplete suppression of the RAAS. Thereby, aliskiren – alone or in combination – might offer a novel therapeutic intervention to improve suppression of the RAAS, with potential to translate to improved CVD and CKD outcomes.

Areas covered in this review: Herein, we present the current state of knowledge of DRIs in the preclinical and clinical realm and their antihypertensive efficacy in relation to cardiovascular and renal risk. Recent clinical trials (2007 – 2009) support the efficacy of aliskiren, and studies suggest the potential for improved CVD and CKD outcomes.

What the reader will gain: An understanding of the mechanism of action of DRIs and a perspective of recent clinical trials.

Take home message: The DRI aliskiren is an effective antihypertensive agent that preliminary data suggests has a beneficial effect in CVD and CKD. Combination of aliskiren with an ACEi or ARB may be better tolerated than the ACEi–ARB combination. Future work is needed to further quantify aliskiren's impact on hard CVD and CKD end points.     

Aliskiren: beyond blood pressure reduction

Importance of the field: Hypertension is one of the most important risk factors and causes of cardiovascular disease (CVD). From some years, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors such angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and angiotensin receptor blockade (ARB) have been of interest, not only for better blood pressure (BP) control but also for their involvement in the mechanisms of various organ functions.

Areas covered in this review: The aim of this review is to focus on the effectiveness and safety of aliskiren beyond the treatment of hypertension.

What the reader will gain: Aliskiren, the first approved renin inhibitor to reach the market, is a low-molecular-weight, orally active, hydrophilic non-peptide molecule that blocks angiotensin I generation. Because of its mechanism of action, aliskiren may offer the additional opportunity to inhibit progression of atherosclerosis at tissue level and the potential to be useful in a wide spectrum of conditions. However, we will discuss how it might become a reasonable therapeutic choice also in a broad number of clinical conditions, sharing an increased cardiovascular risk as stable coronary artery disease (CAD), microvascular and cardio-renal disease, diabetes, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

Take home message: Therapy of hypertension through a better blockade of RAAS may be the first step in also achieving interesting results in the complications that hypertension causes in several organs.     

Emerging drugs for chronic kidney disease

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide health problem. Despite remarkable headway in slowing the progression of kidney diseases, the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing in all countries with a severe impact on patients and society. The high incidence of diabetes and hypertension, along with the aging population, may partially explain this growth. Currently, the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for CKD, aiming to slow progression to ESRD are ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for their hemodynamic/antihypertensive and anti-inflammatory/antifibrotic action. However, novel drugs would be highly desirable to effectively slow the progressive renal function loss.

Areas covered: Through the search engines, PubMed and ClinicalTrial.gov, the scientific literature was reviewed in search of emerging drugs in Phase II or III trials, which appear to be the most promising for CKD treatment.

Expert opinion: The great expectations for new drugs for the management of CKD over the last decade have unfortunately not been met. Encouraging results from preliminary studies with specific agents need to be tempered with caution, given the absence of consistent and adequate data. To date, several agents that showed great promise in animal studies have been less effective in humans.     

Renal protective effect of RAAS blockade across the renal continuum,with a review of the efficacy and safety of valsartan

Abstract

Objective:

The purpose of this report is to review key data on the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) valsartan, along with data from several pivotal studies with other ARBs and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, to highlight the beneficial class effects of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade throughout the renal continuum.     

The Role of Direct Renin Inhibition in Clinical Practice

Monotherapy with most antihypertensive agents reduces systolic BP by about 10 mmHg (‘Rule of 10’). Thus, the majority of hypertensive patients require combination therapy to achieve BP goals. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and discuss the rationale, clinical evidence, and shortcomings related to the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in combination with angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]). We summarize the rationale and clinical evidence supporting the use of the direct renin inhibitor (DRI) aliskiren, particularly in combination with other antihypertensive classes, including in high-risk patients with diabetes mellitus and with or without diabetic nephropathy. DRIs may be useful in combination with ACE inhibitors or ARBs as they provide a more complete blockade of the RAAS, effectively suppressing residual angiotensin II production and the counter-regulatory increase in plasma renin activity observed in patients receiving monotherapy with ACE inhibitors or ARBs.     

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers for prevention and treatment of nephropathy associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Renal complications resulting from type 2 diabetes mellitus are costly and common. Finding optimal therapy is important for the prevention and management of diabetic nephropathy. Research has focused on antihypertensive agents that modify the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Because of their effects on the glomerulus, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been studied as interventions at various stages of diabetic nephropathy. The ACE inhibitors may delay the progression to microalbuminuria and then clinical albuminuria. The ARBs decrease albuminuria in patients with microalbuminuria and decrease adverse renal events, specifically the progression to end-stage renal disease in patients with clinical albuminuria and hypertension. Limited data suggest that combination therapy with ACE inhibitors and ARBs may slow the progression of microalbuminuria to clinical albuminuria. Because of the variability in degree of albuminuria evaluated and in study designs (numbers of patients, study duration, drug dosages, and outcomes measured), a detailed review of the available literature about ACE inhibitors and ARBs in the prevention or treatment of diabetic nephropathy may provide insight to clinicians.     

Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of hypertension

The rising incidence of stroke, congestive heart failure (CHF) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) has signalled a need to increase awareness, treatment and control of hypertension. There continues to be a need for effective antihypertensive medications since hypertension is a major precursor to various forms of cardiovascular disease. The renin-angiotensin (AT) aldosterone system (RAAS) is a key component to the development of hypertension and can be one target of drug therapy. Angotensin II (ATII) receptor blockers (ARBs) are the most recent class of agents available to treat hypertension, which work by by inhibiting ATII at the receptor level. Currently, national consensus guidelines recommend that ARBs should be reserved for hypertensive patients who cannot tolerate angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEIs). ARBs, however, are moving to the forefront of therapy with a promising role in the area of renoprotection and CHF. Recent trials such as the The Renoprotective Effect of the Angiotensin-Receptor Antagonist Irbesartan in Patients with Nephropathy Due to Type 2 Diabetes Trial (IDNT), the Effect of Irbesartan on the Development of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (IRMA2), and The Effects of Losartan on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy (RENAAL) study have demonstrated the renoprotective effects of ARBs in patients with Type 2 diabetes. The Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) adds to the growing body of evidence that ARBs may improve morbidity and mortality in CHF patients. As a class, ARBs are well tolerated and have a lower incidence of cough and angioedema compared to ACEIs. This article reviews the differences among the ARBs, existing efficacy data in hypertension, and explores the role of ARBs in CHF and renal disease.     

Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of hypertension

The rising incidence of stroke, congestive heart failure (CHF) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) has signalled a need to increase awareness, treatment and control of hypertension. There continues to be a need for effective antihypertensive medications since hypertension is a major precursor to various forms of cardiovascular disease. The renin-angiotensin (AT) aldosterone system (RAAS) is a key component to the development of hypertension and can be one target of drug therapy. Angotensin II (ATII) receptor blockers (ARBs) are the most recent class of agents available to treat hypertension, which work by by inhibiting ATII at the receptor level. Currently, national consensus guidelines recommend that ARBs should be reserved for hypertensive patients who cannot tolerate angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEIs). ARBs, however, are moving to the forefront of therapy with a promising role in the area of renoprotection and CHF. Recent trials such as the The Renoprotective Effect of the Angiotensin-Receptor Antagonist Irbesartan in Patients with Nephropathy Due to Type 2 Diabetes Trial (IDNT), the Effect of Irbesartan on the Development of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (IRMA2), and The Effects of Losartan on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy (RENAAL) study have demonstrated the renoprotective effects of ARBs in patients with Type 2 diabetes. The Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) adds to the growing body of evidence that ARBs may improve morbidity and mortality in CHF patients. As a class, ARBs are well tolerated and have a lower incidence of cough and angioedema compared to ACEIs. This article reviews the differences among the ARBs, existing efficacy data in hypertension, and explores the role of ARBs in CHF and renal disease.     

Hypertensive nephropathy: prevention and treatment recommendations

Importance of the field: A worldwide epidemic of chronic kidney disease (CKD) exists; hypertensive nephropathy is second only to diabetes as a leading cause of progressive CKD. Due to the increasing morbidity and mortality and escalating costs associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), novel therapeutic strategies are needed urgently to maximally reduce albuminuria, control blood pressure, and delay progression of hypertensive nephropathy to ESRD. In particular, rational use of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone (RAAS) blockers and achieving blood pressure targets are crucial to reduce cardiovascular and renal outcomes.

Areas covered in this review: We discuss the pathophysiology of hypertensive nephropathy and review current research evidence in support of i) albuminuria reduction as a key factor to maximally slow CKD progression, ii) the blood pressure (BP) goal of < 130 mmHg, and iii) strategies for prevention and optimal treatment of hypertensive nephropathy.

What will the reader gain: Insight into the complexity of treating patients with hypertensive nephropathy and the effective strategies required for reducing albuminuria, achieving BP goals and delaying progression of hypertensive nephropathy.

Take home message: Patients with hypertensive proteinuric nephropathy need aggressive BP-lowering with multiple agents that should include RAAS blockers, calcium antagonists and diuretics to maximally slow progression to ESRD.     

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: effects on hypertensive target organ damage

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a relevant role not only in the pathophysiology of essential hypertension, but also in the development of hypertensive target organ damage. Different drugs acting on RAAS components are now available: angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II AT1 receptors blockers (ARBs), non-selective and selective aldosterone antagonists. The review will focus on their effects on hypertensive organ damage. In fact, apart from the well known efficacy in reducing blood pressure, all these drugs have been demonstrated to protect against target organ damage, reversing or preventing its development. The main issues addressed will be: effects of the RAAS blockade on heart and kidney disease, protective action against arterial wall damage, with a focus on the endothelial protection. The comparison among ACE inhibitors, ARBs and aldosterone antagonists will be discussed, with specific reference to different class and/or drug effects and to the results of few studies evaluating the effects of combination therapy with different drugs blocking the RAAS.     

Combinations of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system antagonists: true advantages?

The renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors induce an incomplete blockade of the system at different steps. Recently, the dual RAAS therapy is emerging in clinical practice, although there is a lack of evidence on safety and efficacy for this combination in several cardiovascular diseases. In this review, we evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of dual RAAS blockade in hypertension, proteinuric renal disease, heart failure and ischaemic heart disease. The role of DRIs in combination with ACEI or ARBs is promising, but still needs further studies. On the basis of the clinical outcomes and safety data the recommendations guidelines have not confirmed indications to dual RAAS blockade in essential hypertension treatment, heart failure and ischemic heart disease. Only proteinuric nephropathies and resistant hypertension may represent possible indications to dual RAAS blockade. Actually, rational combinations of either an ACEI or ARB or DRI with other classes of antihypertensives offer best solutions.     

The biochemical pharmacology of renin inhibitors: Implications for translational medicine in hypertension, diabetic nephropathy and heart failure: Expectations and reality

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a dominant role in the pathophysiology of hypertension, Diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and chronic heart failure (CHF). Therefore, drugs that block key components of the RAAS such as ACE inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have gained wide clinical use for these indications. Despite progress, the morbidity and mortality of patients treated with ACEi or ARBs remain high. Small molecules that directly inhibit renin (DRI) and are orally active have also been developed and one such drug, aliskiren, was introduced into clinical use for treatment of hypertension in 2007. Further clinical trials aimed to expand the therapeutic use of aliskiren are in progress for CKD-DM and CHF. In this review we analyze and review the translational medicine prospects of aliskiren in respect to the biochemical pharmacology of the RAAS, the marketed RAAS modulators and the new emerging science regarding the role of prorenin, renin and renin receptors in cardiovascular biology and disease. The information already gained with aliskiren, raises questions regarding the advantages of DRIs as monotherapy compared to marketed ACEis and ARBs, their potential added value in combination with other RAAS modulators and other unproven benefits in relation to prorenin and renin receptor biology. This review will also indicate basic and clinical research needs that are critical to determine whether DRIs can provide meaningful added medical benefits over contemporary medicines that regulate the RAAS, and the need to identify patients that are more likely to benefit from DRIs and any possible long term adverse effects.     

Perindopril versus angiotensin II receptor blockade in hypertension and coronary artery disease: implications of clinical trials

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is now known to play a key role in the pathogenesis of hypertension and a range of other cardiovascular diseases. Two groups of drugs, the ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) have been developed with the aim of improving clinical outcomes by regulating the RAAS in patients with cardiovascular disease. Initial assumptions were that these two drug types might be interchangeable, but ongoing research has revealed differences between them in terms of pharmacology and outcomes in clinical trials. Although both groups of drugs lower blood pressure, studies of the ACE inhibitor perindopril have revealed preservation of beneficial vascular and endothelial effects mediated by bradykinin and nitric oxide. The selective blockade exerted by ARBs is not associated with these effects. Furthermore, examination of clinical endpoints in major clinical trials has provoked discussion about outcomes comparing ACE inhibitors and ARBs, with recent debate focusing on the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients receiving these agents. Whether there is an actual difference in protection from MI remains unresolved, although available data confirm the benefit and safety of ACE inhibitors, in particular perindopril, for myocardial protection.     

Angiotensin II-receptor blockers: clinical relevance and therapeutic role.

The limitations of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and the role of angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) in the treatment of hypertension, heart failure, and diabetic nephropathy are discussed. Although ACE inhibitors are generally well tolerated, two important class-related adverse effects are cough, which is common, and angioedema, which is rare but serious. Cough and angioedema appear to be less frequent with ARBs than with ACE inhibitors. ARBs seem to be as capable as ACE inhibitors of producing renal dysfunction. ARBs may offer more complete inhibition of angiotensin II than ACE inhibitors. The mechanism of action is based on selective binding to angiotensin type 1 receptors. Many clinical studies have shown that ARBs lower blood pressure as effectively as other antihypertensive agents, including ACE inhibitors. ARBs do not appear to have a greater clinical effect than ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure. Some studies of combination ARB and ACE inhibitor therapy for heart failure indicate advantages of the combination over therapy with either class. ARBs may exert renal protective effects in diabetic nephropathy. ARBs offer an alternative to ACE inhibitors in the management of hypertension, especially for ACE-inhibitor-intolerant patients. ACE inhibitors remain the drugs of choice for patients with heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction after MI, and diabetic nephropathy; ARBs offer these patients an alternative when ACE inhibitor therapy is not tolerated.     

ARBs and ACEis together in the treatment of hypertension and its complications? current practical recommendations

Importance of the field: Arterial hypertension is highly prevalent in the general population. Its contribution to the development and evolution of cardiovascular and renal disease is well recognized. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) have demonstrated favorable effects on cardiovascular and renal prognosis; however, some limitations have been described, for example angiotensin and aldosterone breakthrough.

Areas covered in this review: This article describes several therapeutical strategies that can be administered with an ACEi or ARB, such as the direct renin inhibitors or the aldosterone receptor antagonists.

What the reader will gain: The addition of an ACEi to an ARB or vice versa was initially considered as a way of obtaining a stronger suppression of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), but recent evidence has shown that the combination of the two classes of drugs does not seem to afford the expected increase in benefit.

Take home message: RAAS suppression with monotherapy is associated with beneficial cardiovascular effects, but has several limitations. Direct renin inhibitors and aldosterone receptor antagonists will increase the benefits of dual blockade. We need randomized trial data supporting reduction of cardiovascular events with an adequate safety profile using combination therapies.     

Angiotensin II reactivation and aldosterone escape phenomena in renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade: is oral renin inhibition the solution?

This editorial considers the use of the first selective oral renin inhibitor, aliskiren, in reducing angiotensin (Ang) II reactivation or aldosterone (ALDO) escape during renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition. RAAS blockade with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and/or angiotensin receptor AT(1) blockers (ARBs) is very useful for the treatment of arterial hypertension, chronic heart failure (CHF), atherosclerosis and diabetes. 'Ang II reactivation' and 'ALDO escape' or 'breakthrough' have been observed during either ACEI or ARB treatment, and may attenuate the clinical benefit of RAAS blockade. Renin and Ang I accumulate during ACE inhibition, and might overcome the ability of an ACEI to effectively suppress ACE activity. There is also data suggesting that 30 - 40% of Ang II formation in the healthy human during RAAS activation is formed via renin-dependent, but ACE-independent, pathways. Moreover, ACE gene polymorphisms contribute to the modulation and adequacy of the neurohormonal response to long-term ACE inhibition, at least in patients with CHF (up to 45% of CHF patients have elevated Ang II levels despite the long-term use of an ACEI) or diabetes. The reactivated Ang II promotes ALDO secretion and sodium reabsorption. ALDO breakthrough also occurs during long-term ARB therapy, mainly by an AT(2)-dependent mechanism. This was related to target-organ damage in animal models. Oral renin inhibition with aliskiren has showed excellent efficacy and safety in the treatment of hypertension. Aliskiren can be co-administered with ACEIs, ARBs or hydrochlorothiazide. Furthermore, there is evidence suggesting that aliskiren reduces Ang II reactivation in ACE inhibition and ALDO escape during treatment with an ACEI or an ARB, at least to the degree that this is associated with the RAAS. For RAAS-independent ALDO production, the combination of aliskiren with eplerenone might prove useful.     

Blood pressure lowering for the prevention and treatment of diabetic kidney disease

The current pandemic of diabetes mellitus will inevitably be followed by an epidemic of chronic kidney disease. It is anticipated that 25-40% of patients with type 1 diabetes and 5-40% of patients with type 2 diabetes will ultimately develop diabetic kidney disease. The control of blood pressure represents a key component for the prevention and management of diabetic nephropathy. There is a strong epidemiological connection between hypertension in diabetes and adverse outcomes in diabetes. Hypertension is closely linked to insulin resistance as part of the 'metabolic syndrome'. Diabetic nephropathy may lead to hypertension through direct actions on renal sodium handling, vascular compliance and vasomotor function. Recent clinical trials also support the utility of blood pressure reduction in the prevention of diabetic kidney disease. In patients with normoalbuminuria, transition to microalbuminuria can be prevented by blood pressure reduction. This action appears to be significant regardless of whether patients have elevated blood pressure or not. The efficacy of ACE inhibition appears to be greater than that achieved by other agents with a similar degree of blood pressure reduction; although large observational studies suggest the risk of microalbuminuria may be reduced by blood pressure reduction, regardless of modality. In patients with established microalbuminuria, ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) consistently reduce the risk of progression from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria, over and above their antihypertensive actions. The clinical utility of combining these strategies remains to be established. In patients with overt nephropathy, blood pressure reduction is associated with reduced urinary albumin excretion and, subsequently, a reduced risk of renal impairment or end stage renal disease. In addition to actions on systemic blood pressure, it is now clear that ACE inhibitors and ARBs also reduce proteinuria in patients with diabetes. This anti-proteinuric activity is distinct from other antihypertensive agents and diuretics. Although there is a clear physiological rationale for blockade of the renin angiotensin system, which is strongly supported by clinical studies, to achieve the optimal lowering of blood pressure, particularly in the setting of established diabetic renal disease, a number of different antihypertensive agents will always be needed. In the end, the choice of agents should be individualised to achieve the maximal tolerated reduction in blood pressure and albuminuria. Ultimately, no matter how it is achieved, so long as it is achieved, renal risk can be reduced by agents that lower blood pressure and albuminuria.