Differences between statins on clinical endpoints: a population-based cohort study

ABSTRACT

Objective: Many studies have shown differences between statins based on surrogate endpoints, but few have studied differences in reaching clinical endpoints.

This study compares the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events between atorvastatin users and other statin users in daily general practice.

Research design and methods: A cohort study was performed in the Integrated Primary Care Information project database, a longitudinal general practice research database with electronic patient records of more than 500?000 individuals in the Netherlands. All new statin users in the period 1st September 1999 to 31st December 2002 were included. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis was used to compare the occurrence of the primary endpoint between atorvastatin users and other statin users.

Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was the composite outcome of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, admission for unstable angina pectoris, fatal or non-fatal cerebrovascular accidents, or transient ischaemic events.

Results: 3499 new statin users were identified, including 797 patients with a history of cardiovascular disease. 1341 persons started with simvastatin (38.3%), 1154 with atorvastatin (33.0%), 811 with pravastatin (23.2%) and 193 with other statins (5.5%). The median follow-up was 1.9 years. Two hundred and thirty three patients (6.7%) experienced a primary endpoint. Atorvastatin users had a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events than users of other statins (relative risk [RR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55–0.96). The relative risks of atorvastatin users compared to simvastatin and pravastatin users individually were 0.70 (95% CI: 0.48–1.02) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.52–1.16), respectively. The protective effect of atorvastatin was more pronounced in persons without a history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events.

Conclusion: Atorvastatin showed a more favourable effect on fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in the general population than other statins.     

Atorvastatin efficacy in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events

Atorvastatin has been extensively studied in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events, and may have some clinical advantages over various other statins in these respects. The principal primary prevention study of atorvastatin, ASCOT-LLA (Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm), revealed that atorvastatin reduced the relative risk of primary coronary heart disease (CHD) events by 36% (p = 0.0005) compared with placebo in patients with hypertension. Much published data confirm the secondary preventive benefits of atorvastatin in various clinical settings. The IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering) and TNT (Treating to New Targets) trials demonstrate the preventive efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with stable CHD. Relative to simvastatin (in the IDEAL trial) and low-dosage atorvastatin (in the TNT trial), intensive atorvastatin therapy (80 mg/day) reduced the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) by 17-22% (p < or = 0.02). Furthermore, the ALLIANCE (Aggressive Lipid-Lowering Initiation Abates New Cardiac Events) and GREACE (GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation) trials highlight the benefits of atorvastatin in the 'real world' setting in patients with stable CHD. Compared with 'usual' care, atorvastatin reduced the risk of nonfatal MI by 47-59% (p < or = 0.0002).Moreover, the MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering), PROVE-IT (PRavastatin Or atorVastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy) and IDEAL-ACS (Acute Coronary Syndromes) studies outline the benefits of high-dosage atorvastatin therapy started within 24-96 hours, 10 days or 2 months, respectively, of an acute coronary syndrome. Relative to placebo, pravastatin and simvastatin, atorvastatin reduced the risk of death or major cardiovascular events by 16-18% (p < or = 0.048). In patients undergoing revascularisation procedures, the AVERT (Atorvastatin VErsus Revascularisation Treatment) study revealed that 18 months' administration of atorvastatin 80 mg/day was at least as effective as angioplasty plus usual care in reducing the risk of ischaemic events in low-risk patients with stable coronary artery disease. Furthermore, the ARMYDA (Atorvastatin for Reduction in MYocardial DAmage during angioplasty) and ARMYDA-3 trials showed that 7 days' administration of atorvastatin 40 mg/day before coronary intervention significantly reduced the risks of periprocedural myocardial damage (ARMYDA), postprocedural MI (p = 0.025; ARMYDA) and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.003; ARMYDA-3) versus placebo. In addition, it has been reported that C-reactive protein levels and the combined incidence of cardiovascular events (death, MI and target segment revascularisation during the 6-month follow-up) were significantly higher in coronaropathic patients undergoing non-surgical revascularisation procedures (stent implantation) not receiving statin therapy compared with those treated with atorvastatin (80mg). Overall, therefore, the marked efficacy of atorvastatin in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events underscores the pivotal place that this statin has in general cardiovascular disease management, and suggests even greater potential clinical utility for the drug in some clinical settings.     

CARDS on the table: should everybody with type 2 diabetes take a statin?

ABSTRACT

Background: Vascular complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The recently published Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) showed that atorvastatin (10?mg, once daily vs. placebo) markedly reduces vascular events in this high-risk population. The participants (?n = 2838) were fairly typical T2DM patients without cardiovascular disease and with at least one other risk factor: hypertension, retinopathy, albuminuria or current smoking. In the treatment group, coronary events were reduced by 36% (?p = 0.001) and stroke by 48% (?p = 0.001). The trial was terminated two years early on ethical grounds. The number needed to treat (NNT) was 27 for four years to prevent one event. However, the benefit may have been greater since a proportion of the placebo group received statin therapy. The benefit from statin treatment was independent of sex, age, baseline lipid levels, systolic blood pressure, retinopathy, albuminuria, smoking or HbA_1c. The frequency of adverse events did not differ between the groups. These findings support those of other statin trials.

Scope: CARDS does not comment on renal function. However, other trials suggest that statins preserve renal function in those with and without DM. We discuss the CARDS study in this context in this brief overview paper.

Conclusions: the evidence shows that we need to control glucose to prevent microvascular complications, to lower cholesterol to prevent macrovascular disease and to lower blood pressure to prevent both. It may be that the benefit of statins extends beyond a threshold low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in patients with T2DM. More trials are needed in this field.     

Effect of atorvastatin on highdensity lipoprotein cholesteroland its relationship withcoronary events: a subgroupanalysis of the GREekAtorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) Study

SUMMARY

Objective: To investigate the relationship between changes in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels after statin treatment and the risk for coronary heart disease (CHD)-related events in the secondary CHD prevention GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary heart disease Evaluation (GREACE) Study. These findings suggested that dose titration

with atorvastatin (10-80mg/day, mean 24mg/day) achieves the National Cholesterol Educational Program treatment goals and significantly reduces morbidity and mortality, in comparison to usual care.

Methods: Analysis of variance was used to assess the effect of atorvastatin on HDL-C over

time (up to 48 months) in 1600 CHD patients. The time-dependent multivariate Cox predictive model, involving backward stepwise logistic regression, was used to evaluate the relation between coronary events and HDL-C changes.

Results: The mean increase in HDL-C levels during the study was 7%. All doses of atorvastatin significantly increased HDL-C levels. Increases were greater in men (7.8 vs 6.1%; p?=?0.02), in combined hyperlipidaemia (7.9 vs 6.4% for hypercholesterol-aemia; p?=?0.04), and in the lower baseline HDL-C quartile (9.2 vs 5.3%, 1st vs 4th quartile; p?=?0.001). After adjustment for 24 predictors of coronary events, multivariate analysis revealed a Hazards Ratio of 0.85 (95% confidence

interval 0.76-0.94; p?=?0.002) for every 4?mg/dL (0.1?mmol/L) increase in HDL-C.

Conclusions: There was a significant beneficial effect on HDL-C levels across the dose range of atorvastatin. Clinical outcomes in the structured care arm of GREACE were determined in part by the extent of atorvastatin-induced HDL-C increase. This effect was independent from benefit induced by low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction, suggesting that the CHD risk reduction associated with a rise in a low HDL-C at baseline remains significant under aggressive (-46%) LDL-C lowering conditions. However, the relationship between HDL-C and vascular risk may be weaker when LDL-C levels are aggressively lowered.     

曲美他嗪联合阿托伐他汀治疗冠心病效果观察

目的 探讨并分析曲美他嗪联合阿托伐他汀治疗冠心病的临床效果。方法 选取航天中心医院2014年2月至2015年5月接收的老年冠心病患者100例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组患者50例,对照组仅采用阿托伐他汀进行治疗,观察组采用曲美他嗪和阿托伐他汀联合进行治疗,观察两组患者治疗后治疗有效率、心血管事件发生率、血脂变化情况等。结果 观察组治疗有效率显著高于对照组,观察组的心血管事件发生率、血脂水平改善情况较对照组更优,两组各个指标差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 阿托伐他汀与曲美他嗪联用治疗冠心病能够显著改善患者体征,降低血脂和心血管事件发生率,值得在临床中推广应用。     

Differences between statins on clinical endpoints: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE: Many studies have shown differences between statins based on surrogate endpoints, but few have studied differences in reaching clinical endpoints.This study compares the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events between atorvastatin users and other statin users in daily general practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cohort study was performed in the Integrated Primary Care Information project database, a longitudinal general practice research database with electronic patient records of more than 500,000 individuals in The Netherlands. All new statin users in the period 1st September 1999 to 31st December 2002 were included. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis was used to compare the occurrence of the primary endpoint between atorvastatin users and other statin users. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the composite outcome of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, admission for unstable angina pectoris, fatal or non-fatal cerebrovascular accidents, or transient ischaemic events. RESULTS: 3499 new statin users were identified, including 797 patients with a history of cardiovascular disease. 1341 persons started with simvastatin (38.3%), 1154 with atorvastatin (33.0%), 811 with pravastatin (23.2%) and 193 with other statins (5.5%). The median follow-up was 1.9 years. Two hundred and thirty three patients (6.7%) experienced a primary endpoint. Atorvastatin users had a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events than users of other statins (relative risk [RR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.96). The relative risks of atorvastatin users compared to simvastatin and pravastatin users individually were 0.70 (95% CI: 0.48-1.02) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.52-1.16), respectively. The protective effect of atorvastatin was more pronounced in persons without a history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events. CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin showed a more favourable effect on fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in the general population than other statins.     

Persistence of atorvastatin and simvastatin among patients with and without prior cardiovascular diseases: a US managed care study

ABSTRACT

Background: In clinical practice, persistence with statin therapy is poor. While little is known about relative persistence to specific statins, previous studies have observed greater persistence in patients who achieve greater degrees of lipid lowering. Identification of statin therapies which improve patient persistence has the potential to improve the quality of patient care and clinical outcomes. Therefore, we assessed patient persistence with atorvastatin and simvastatin in primary and secondary prevention patients enrolled in managed care.

Methods: New statin users aged ≥18 years, both with and without prior cardiovascular (CV) events within the 12 month pre-treatment period, were identified from a large national database of managed care patients. Patients initiated atorvastatin or simvastatin therapy from January 1, 2003 to September 30, 2005 and were continuously enrolled in a covered plan for at least 12 months before and after initiation of statin therapy. Subanalyses of patients ≥65 years were also conducted. Measures of interest included demographic and clinical characteristics of the study samples and persistence of statin utilization over the 1-year follow-up period. Persistence was defined as the number of days a patient remained on treatment in the first year following their index date, measured from the date of first fill to study end or the date of discontinuation.

Results: A total of 129 764 atorvastatin users and 45 558 simvastatin users without prior CV events were included in the study. For those patients with prior CV events, a total of 6888 atorvastatin users and 4443 simvastatin users were included in the study. Median persistence in patients without prior CV events was 50 days longer for patients initiating therapy with atorvastatin than simvastatin (207 vs. 157 days, p < 0.0001) and after adjusting for confounding factors, those treated with atorvastatin were 15% less likely to discontinue therapy during the first year than those treated with simvastatin (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.84, 0.86; p < 0.001). In secondary prevention patients median persistence was 85 days longer in atorvastatin patients than simvastatin patients (266 vs. 181 days, p < 0.0001) and atorvastatin patients were 22% less likely to discontinue therapy (HR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.75, 0.82; p < 0.001). Persistence was worse in the elderly patients, but the relative difference between atorvastatin and simvastatin was similar to the overall patient population.

Conclusions: In patients with and without prior CV disease, persistence is generally poor, even worse in the elderly, but significantly better for atorvastatin patients than simvastatin patients (p < 0.001). Further studies are required to determine whether this is due to differences in cost, effectiveness, side-effects, or other attributes of the statins.

Study limitations: Differences in persistence could be, in part, due to unmeasured confounders although all available variables were adjusted in multivariate analyses. Additionally, the claims database lacks some clinical data such as lipid levels, limiting assessments of statin efficacy, and does not include any reasons for discontinuation of therapy.     

Atorvastatin efficacy in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus and/or metabolic syndrome

Several large-scale clinical trials have assessed the efficacy of atorvastatin in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus and/or metabolic syndrome. In primary prevention, CARDS (Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study) showed that atorvastatin 10 mg/day (vs placebo) reduced relative risk of the composite primary endpoint (acute coronary heart disease [CHD] events, coronary revascularisation, or stroke) by 37% (p = 0.001). This decrease was similar to decreases in major cardiovascular events in the ASCOT-LLA (Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm) trial and HPS (Heart Protection Study). However, in CARDS, atorvastatin efficacy was evident as early as 6 months after starting treatment, whereas in HPS, simvastatin efficacy was noticeable only from about 15-18 months after starting treatment. In the ASCOT-LLA trial, in 2226 hypertensive diabetic patients without previous cardiovascular disease, atorvastatin (vs placebo) reduced the relative risk of all cardiovascular events and procedures by 25% (p = 0.038). In secondary prevention, substudies of the GREACE (GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation), TNT (Treating to New Targets) and PROVE-IT (PRavastatin Or atorVastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy) trials reported results for the approximately 15-25% of study participants who had diabetes. In the GREACE substudy, atorvastatin (vs physicians' standard care) significantly reduced the relative risk of total mortality by 52% (p = 0.049), coronary mortality by 62% (p = 0.042), coronary morbidity by 59% (p < 0.002) and stroke by 68% (p = 0.046). In the TNT substudy, incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly lower in diabetic patients treated with atorvastatin 80 mg/day rather than 10 mg/day (13.8% vs 17.9%; relative risk 0.75; p = 0.026). In the PROVE-IT substudy, a significantly lower incidence of acute cardiac events was reported for atorvastatin versus pravastatin recipients (21.1% vs 26.6%; p = 0.03) and, therefore, an absolute risk reduction of 5.5% was associated with atorvastatin therapy. ASPEN (Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of coronary heart disease Endpoints in Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) - a mixed primary and secondary prevention trial in diabetic patients - found that a 29% lower low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level was seen with atorvastatin than placebo at endpoint (p < 0.0001); however, the reduction in composite primary endpoint of major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal major cardiovascular event or stroke, and unstable angina requiring hospitalisation) with atorvastatin (13.7% vs 15.0% with placebo), and reduction in acute myocardial infarction relative risk of 27% with atorvastatin were not statistically significant. In CHD patients with metabolic syndrome (n = 5584) in a sub-analysis of the TNT trial, intensive versus lower-dosage atorvastatin therapy reduced the relative risk of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events by 29% (p < 0.0001). The analysis also revealed that CHD patients with, rather than those without, metabolic syndrome had a 44% greater level of absolute cardiovascular risk, thus clearly underscoring the clinical feasibility of administering intensive lipid-lowering therapy to CHD patients with metabolic syndrome. In summary, several patient populations, from definitive, large-scale studies, are now available to corroborate the integral place of atorvastatin--in line with various regional and internationally accepted disease management guidelines--in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes and/or metabolic syndrome.     

Atorvastatin: its clinical role in cerebrovascular prevention

An association between hypercholesterolaemia and ischaemic stroke has not yet been clearly defined by observational studies. In clinical trials, however, cholesterol-lowering treatments appear to consistently reduce stroke risk. Data are now available from various primary prevention studies - ALLHAT-LLT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack, Lipid-Lowering Therapy), ASCOT-LLA (Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial, Lipid-Lowering Arm), CARDS (Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study, WOSCOPS (West of Scotland COronary Prevention Study) - and secondary prevention studies - 4S (Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study), CARE (Cholesterol and Recurrent Events), GREACE (GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation), HPS (Heart Protection Study), LIPID (Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease), MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering), SPARCL (Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels), TNT (Treating to New Targets) - confirming the ability of statins to reduce stroke risk. Regarding primary prevention, post hoc analyses showed pravastatin reduced the relative risk of stroke by 9-11% (not statistically significant) in the ALLHAT-LLT and WOSCOPS trials, whereas atorvastatin reduced this risk by 27-48% in the ASCOT-LLA (p = 0.024) and CARDS trials. It remains to be established in prospective studies whether cholesterol-lowering is effective in the primary prevention of stroke. Regarding secondary prevention, in five placebo-controlled studies (4S, CARE, HPS, LIPID, MIRACL) involving a total of >40 000 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), statin therapy reduced the relative risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke by 19-50% (p < or = 0.048); the largest decrease was produced by atorvastatin in the MIRACL study (-50%, p = 0.045). In addition, high-dosage atorvastatin reduced stroke risk by 25% (p = 0.02) relative to lower-dosage therapy in the TNT trial, and by 47% (p = 0.034) relative to 'usual' care in the GREACE study. A post hoc analysis of data for 3280 HPS study participants who had had a previous stroke revealed that simvastatin reduced major vascular events by 20% (p = 0.001).The SPARCL study assessed the secondary preventive efficacy of atorvastatin versus placebo in 4731 patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), but without CHD. Atorvastatin reduced the adjusted relative risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke by 16% (p = 0.03), and that of fatal stroke alone by 43% (p = 0.03). Among secondary study endpoints, atorvastatin reduced the relative risks of stroke and TIA (-23%; p < 0.001), TIA alone (-26%; p = 0.004), and ischaemic stroke (-22%; p = 0.01). Overall, SPARCL study findings suggest that intensive atorvastatin therapy should be started immediately after a stroke or TIA. In summary, atorvastatin has developed a well defined role in the primary and secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease, and appears to have a particularly prominent place in preventing such disease in CHD patients, and in the post-stroke and post-TIA setting in patients without CHD.     

Atorvastatin: safety and tolerability

Importance of the field: Atorvastatin is the most widely used statin administered in a variety of settings, including primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events, in the elderly, in patients with chronic kidney disease and in diabetic patients. Therefore, the safety and tolerability of atorvastatin is of paramount importance.

Areas covered in this review: We searched MEDLINE for literature published between 1997 and 2010 on the safety and tolerability of atorvastatin. We retrieved data from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, post-marketing studies, reports to regulatory bodies and case reports of rare adverse events.

What the reader will gain: The reader will gain insight into the incidence, severity, prevention and management of the major adverse effects of atorvastatin (i.e., liver function abnormalities and muscle-related side effects) overall and in special populations.

Take home message: The existing data suggest that atorvastatin is generally well tolerated across the range of its therapeutic dosage (10 – 80 mg/day).     

Relationship between LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels and clinical outcome in the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) study

SUMMARY

Background: Although available guidelines suggest reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to below 100?mg/dL (2.6?mmol/L), the importance of target-oriented therapy remains controversial. To assess whether achieving guideline-based targets is of benefit, the relationship between clinical outcomes and lipid levels (baseline and on-study) was evaluated in the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) study. This study demonstrated significant reductions in morbidity and mortality associated with active dose titration of atorvastatin and structured management of dyslipidaemia.

Methods and results: Intention-to-treat analysis (Cox proportional hazards model)?was used to assess the relationship between lipid values and coronary events. Higher levels of LDL-C at baseline were associated with a greater risk of subsequent events among patients randomized to usual care. Reducing the LDL-C and the non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) level to the National Cholesterol Educational Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III goals required greater doses of atorvastatin for the higher baseline quartile of LDL-C. During the study there was a greater reduction in the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) events in atorvastatin-treated patients who were in the highest quartile of LDL-C at baseline, after achieving the LDL-C treatment goal, in comparison to the usual care patients in the highest baseline LDL-C quartile.

Conclusions: Achieving the NCEP ATP III LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals by titrating up the dose of atorvastatin was associated with a significant reduction in vascular events in patients with CHD. The greatest benefit was seen in those patients with the highest baseline LDL-C levels.     

Cardiovascular disease in patients with renal disease: the role of statins

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Atherosclerosis is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents a major cause of death. The National Kidney Foundation guidelines favour the use of statin therapy for treatment of dyslipidaemia in patients with CKD. Much evidence supports statin therapy for reducing CVD and improving outcomes in the general population, but there is less evidence in patients with CKD. Consequently, prevention of CVD in CKD is based primarily on extrapolation from non-CKD trials. Significantly, in trials specifically designed to investigate patients with CKD, evidence is emerging for improved cardiovascular outcomes with statin therapy. This review describes available data relating to cardiovascular outcomes and the role of statins in patients with CKD, including pre-dialysis, dialysis, and renal transplant patients.

Research design and methods: The PubMed database was searched (1998–present) to ensure comprehensive identification of publications (including randomised clinical trials) relevant to CKD patients, patterns of cardiovascular outcome in such patients and their relationship to lipid profile, and the role of statins for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular complications.

Results: There are conflicting data on the relationship between dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular outcomes, with one major study of statin therapy (4D – Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse Studie) providing equivocal results. Further studies, including AURORA (A study to evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in subjects On Regular haemodialysis: an Assessment of survival and cardiovascular events; NCT00240331) in patients receiving haemodialysis, and SHARP (Study of Heart And Renal Protection; NCT00125593) in patients with CKD including those on dialysis, should help to clarify the role of statin therapy in these populations.

Conclusions: More studies are needed to elucidate the role of statins in improving cardiovascular outcomes for CKD patients. It is anticipated that ongoing clinical trials geared towards the optimal prevention and treatment of CVD in patients with CKD will help guide clinicians in the management of CKD.     

Economic impacts attributable to the early clinical benefit of atorvastatin therapy – a US managed care perspective

ABSTRACT

Objective: The clinical literature suggests that atorvastatin therapy achieves a reduction in major cardiovascular events within the first year of therapy. Aside from obvious clinical benefits, economic advantage may also result from this observation. The present analysis modeled the clinical and economic consequences of initiating atorvastatin versus generic simvastatin in defined US managed care organization patient populations.

Research design and methods: A cost-consequence model was developed to estimate the differential rate and associated costs of cardiovascular events occurring over 2 years using real world price and adherence data. Four defined patient populations were included from representative atorvastatin trials: (1) diabetes mellitus; (2) multiple risk factors; (3) coronary heart disease; and (4) acute coronary syndrome. Costs of care included drug costs and costs of managing cardiovascular events. Univariate sensitivity analyses and multivariate sensitivity analysis via Monte Carlo simulation were conducted to test the robustness of the results.

Main outcome measures: The number of cardiovascular events avoided per 100^?000 patients initiated on atorvastatin as compared with simvastatin, and total treatment costs.

Results: The model predicts that, relative to simvastatin, atorvastatin will prevent 941 (95% confidence interval [CI] 481–1367) cardiovascular events after 1 year and 1426 (95% CI 833–1987) events after 2 years, per 100?000 patients. This is expected to reduce the cost of cardiovascular events by $365 (95% CI $192–$527) and $552 (95% CI $327–$763) per patient (US$ 2006), respectively, offsetting 80% and 75% of the medication cost difference between atorvastatin and simvastatin after 1 and 2 years, respectively. The incremental costs associated with atorvastatin treatment were estimated at $94 (95% CI –$68 to $267) and $175 (95% CI –$37 to $399) per patient after 1 and 2 years, respectively. Results were sensitive to assumptions regarding simvastatin efficacy and drug acquisition costs.

Conclusions: Although the present analysis is based in part on indirect comparisons and on trials not designed or statistically powered to specifically test the early benefits hypothesis, it suggests that atorvastatin's assumed early reduction of cardiovascular events partly offsets the acquisition price difference between atorvastatin and generic simvastatin in various groups of high-risk patients newly initiated on statin treatment.     

Atorvastatin

Atorvastatin (Lipitor, Pfizer) is a safe and effective 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (statin). It is the most potent currently available statin in terms of lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol levels. It was the first statin shown to lower triglycerides in patients with isolated hypertriglyceridaemia. It has a good safety profile. In common with other statins, it has non-lipid-lowering effects including improving endothelial function, antiproliferative actions on smooth muscle and reducing platelet aggregation. It also has anti-inflammatory effects and may reduce plasma glucose levels. Clinical trial evidence with this statin is currently limited. It did slightly reduce events in the AVERT trial comparing patients receiving coronary angioplasty with those receiving high-dose atorvastatin therapy and in the MIRACL study reduced ischemia in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Other end point trials are in progress.     

Efficacy of atorvastatin after LDL-cholesterol-based dose selection in high risk dyslipidaemic patients: results of the target dose study

ABSTRACT

Background: Hypercholesterolaemia is one of the major risk factors for the development of coronary heart disease (CHD). European guidelines emphasize the importance of reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL?C) levels below 115?mg/dL (3.0?mmol/L) in patients with high CHD risk.

Objective: The present study evaluates whether selection of the atorvastatin starting dose based on baseline LDL?C levels and previous statin treatment status would result in an achievement of LDL?C targets without the need for up-titration.

Methods: A multicentre, prospective, open-label study conducted in Belgium. Patients were at high risk defined as either a history of CHD, another atherosclerotic disease, diabetes mellitus Type 2 or an estimated 10?year CHD risk > 20%. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving the LDL?C goal after 12 weeks of treatment.

Results: Overall, 96.4% of the 195 statin-naïve patients reached the LDL?C target after 12 weeks of treatment. The majority of the patients (95.4%) already reached LDL?C control at Week 6. Mean (SD) LDL?C levels decreased from 159 (25)?mg/dL[(4.1 (0.6)?mmol/L] to 86 (14)?mg/dL [2.2 (0.4)?mmol/L] after 12 weeks of treatment. Only 4.6% of the patients needed an up-titration at Week 6.

Conclusions: Taken together, the results demonstrate that LDL?C based dose selection of atorvastatin is highly efficacious for rapid achievement of target LDL?C levels with a low need for up-titration. Application of this flexible first dosing strategy in general practice will, based on available evidence, increase adherence to atorvastatin treatment in patients with high CHD risk.     

Atorvastatin: a review of its use in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Atorvastatin (Lipitor) is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor with well documented lipid-lowering effects. It has recently been evaluated for the primary prevention of major cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without elevated serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels. Atorvastatin 10mg daily for 4 years was effective at reducing the risk of a first major cardiovascular event, including stroke, in a large, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial in patients with type 2 diabetes and at least one other coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factor, but without markedly elevated LDL-cholesterol levels. In this trial, known as CARDS (the Collaborative AtoRvastatin Diabetes Study), atorvastatin had a similar tolerability profile to that of placebo. Thus, atorvastatin has a potential role in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in diabetic patients at risk of CHD, irrespective of pre-treatment LDL-cholesterol levels.     

Treatment with Atorvastatin to the National Cholesterol Educational Program Goal Versus 'Usual' Care in Secondary Coronary Heart Disease Prevention

Summary

Background: Atorvastatin is very effective in reducing plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. However, there is no long-term survival study that evaluated this statin.

Patients?Methods: To assess the effect of atorvastatin on morbidity and mortality (total and coronary) of patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD), 1600 consecutive patients were randomised either to atorvastatin or to 'usual' medical care. The dose of atorvastatin was titrated from 10 to 80mg/day, in order to reach the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goal of LDL-C <100mg/dl (2.6mmol/l). All patients were followed up for a mean period of 3 years.

Main Outcome Measures: Primary endpoints of the study were defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, revascularisation (coronary morbidity) and stroke. Secondary endpoints were the safety and efficacy of the hypolipidaemic drugs as well as the cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin.

Results: The mean dosage of atorvastatin was 24?mg/day. This statin reduced total cholesterol by 36%, LDL-C by 46%, triglycerides by 31%, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) by 44%, while it increased HDL-C by 7%; all these changes were significant. The NCEP LDL-C and non-HDL-C treatment goals were reached by 95% (n?=?759) and 97% (n?=?776), respectively, of patients on atorvastatin. Only 14% of the 'usual' care patients received any hypolipidaemic drugs throughout the study and 3% of them reached the NCEP LDL-C treatment goal. The cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained with atorvastatin was estimated at $US 8350. During this study 196 (24.5%) CHD patients on 'usual' care had a CHD recurrent event or died vs. 96 (12%) CHD patients on atorvastatin; risk ratio (RR) 0.49, confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.73, p?<?0.0001. In detail, atorvastatin reduced, in comparison to 'usual' care, total mortality (RR 0.57, CI 0.39-0.78, p?=?0.0021), coronary mortality (RR 0.53, CI 0.29-0.74, p?=?0.0017), coronary morbidity (RR 0.46, CI 0.25-0.71, p?<?0.0001), and stroke (RR 0.53, CI 0.30-0.82, p?=?0.034). All subgroups of patients (women, those with diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, age 60 to 75 years, congestive heart failure, recent unstable angina or prior revascularisation) benefited from treatment with atorvastatin. Withdrawal of patients because of side-effects from the atorvastatin group was low (0.75%) and similar to that of the 'usual' care group (0.4%).

Conclusions: Long-term treatment of CHD patients with atorvastatin to achieve NCEP lipid targets significantly reduces total and coronary mortality, coronary morbidity and stroke, in comparison to patients receiving 'usual' medical care. Treatment with atorvastatin is well tolerated and cost-effective.     

Atorvastatin

Atorvastatin (Lipitor?, Pfizer) is a safe and effective 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (statin). It is the most potent currently available statin in terms of lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol levels. It was the first statin shown to lower triglycerides in patients with isolated hypertriglyceridaemia. It has a good safety profile. In common with other statins, it has non-lipid-lowering effects including improving endothelial function, antiproliferative actions on smooth muscle and reducing platelet aggregation. It also has anti-inflammatory effects and may reduce plasma glucose levels. Clinical trial evidence with this statin is currently limited. It did slightly reduce events in the AVERT trial comparing patients receiving coronary angioplasty with those receiving high-dose atorvastatin therapy and in the MIRACL study reduced ischemia in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Other end point trials are in progress.