Escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the relative antidepressant efficacy of escitalopram and comparator antidepressants.

Research design and methods: A meta-analysis was performed using studies in major depressive disorder (MDD) comparing escitalopram with active controls, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] (citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline) and serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs] (venlafaxine, duloxetine). Adult patients had to meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the treatment difference in Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at week?8. Secondary outcome measures were response and remission (MADRS total score ≤?12) rates.

Results: Individual patient data (N?=?4549) from 16 randomized controlled trials were included in the analyses (escitalopram n?=?2272, SSRIs n?=?1750, SNRIs n?=?527). Escitalopram was significantly more effective than comparators in overall treatment effect, with an estimated mean treatment difference of 1.1?points on the MADRS (p?<?0.0001), and in responder (63.7?vs. 58.3%, p?<?0.0001) and remitter (53.1?vs. 49.4%, p?<?0.0059) analyses. Escitalopram was significantly superior to SSRIs, with an estimated difference in response of 62.1?vs. 58.4% and remission of 51.6?vs. 49.0%. In comparison to SNRIs, the estimated difference in response was 68.3?vs. 59.0% (p?=?0.0007) and for remission the difference was 57.8?vs. 50.5% (p?=?0.0088). These results were similar for severely depressed patients (baseline MADRS ≥?30). Sensitivity analyses were performed with data from articles reporting Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) scores. The 8-week withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 5.4% for escitalopram and 7.9% for the comparators (p?<?0.01). This difference was accounted for by statistically significant higher attrition rates in the SNRI comparisons. This work may be limited by the clinical methodology underlying meta-analytic studies, in particular, the exclusion of trials that fail to meet predetermined criteria for inclusion.

Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, superior efficacy of escitalopram compared to SSRIs and SNRIs was confirmed, although the superiority over SSRIs was largely explained by differences between escitalopram and citalopram.     

Comparison of Medicaid spending in schizoaffective patients treated with once monthly paliperidone palmitate or oral atypical antipsychotics

Background Compared to oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs), long-acting injectable antipsychotics require less frequent administration, and thus may improve adherence and reduce risk of relapse in schizoaffective disorder (SAD) patients.

Objective To evaluate the impact of once monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP) versus OAAs on healthcare resource utilization, Medicaid spending, and hospital readmission among SAD patients.

Methods Using FL, IA, KS, MS, MO, and NJ Medicaid data (January 2009–December 2013), adults with ≥2 SAD diagnoses initiated on PP or OAA (index date) were identified. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were assessed during the 12month pre- and post-index periods, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to reduce confounding and compare the estimated treatment effect for PP versus OAA.

Results A total of 10,778 OAA-treated patients and 876 PP-treated patients were selected. Compared to OAAs, PP was associated with significantly lower medical costs (PSM: mean monthly cost difference [MMCD]?=?-$383, p?<?0.001; IPTW: MMCD?=?-$403, p?=?0.016), which offset the higher pharmacy costs associated with PP (PSM: MMCD?=?$270, p?<?0.001; IPTW: MMCD?=?$350, p?<?0.001) and resulted in similar total healthcare cost (PSM: MMCD?=?-$113, p?=?0.414; IPTW: MMCD?=?-$53, p?=?0.697) for PP versus OAA. Reduced risk of hospitalization (PSM: incidence rate ratio [IRR]?=?0.85, p?=?0.128; IPTW: IRR?=?0.96, p?=?0.004) and fewer hospitalization days (PSM: IRR?=?0.74, p?=?0.008; IPTW: IRR?=?0.85, p?<?0.001) were observed in PP versus OAA patients. Among hospitalized patients, PP was associated with a lower risk of 30 day hospital readmission compared to OAA (IPTW: odds ratio?=?0.89, p?=?0.041).

Limitations The Medicaid data may not be representative of the nation or other states, and includes pre-rebate pharmacy costs (potentially over-estimated). Also changes in treatment over time were possible.

Conclusions Total healthcare costs associated with the use of once monthly PP versus OAAs appeared comparable; higher pharmacy costs for PP users were offset by lower medical costs related to fewer and shorter inpatients visits.     

Healthcare costs among adults with type 2 diabetes initiating saxagliptin or linagliptin: a US-based claims analysis

Objective: To compare healthcare costs of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) after initiation of saxagliptin or linagliptin, two antidiabetic medications in the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor medication class.

Methods: Patients with T2D who were at least 18 years old and initiated saxagliptin or linagliptin (index date) between 1 June 2011 and 30 June 2014 were identified in the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. All-cause healthcare costs and diabetes-related costs (T2D diagnosis on a medical claim and/or an antidiabetic medication claim) were measured in the 1 year follow-up period. Saxagliptin and linagliptin initiators were matched using propensity score methods. Cost ratios (CRs) and predicted costs were estimated from generalized linear models and recycled predictions.

Results: There were 34,560 saxagliptin initiators and 18,175 linagliptin initiators identified (mean ages 57 and 59; 55% and 56% male, respectively). Before matching, saxagliptin initiators had significantly lower all-cause total healthcare costs than linagliptin initiators (mean?=?$15,335 [SD $28,923] vs. mean =?$20,069 [SD $48,541], p?p?n?=?16,069 per cohort), saxagliptin initiators had lower all-cause follow-up costs than linagliptin initiators (CR?=?0.953, 95% CI?=?0.932–0.974, p?p?=?0.017; predicted costs?=?$3989 vs. $4159).

Conclusions: Adult patients with T2D initiating treatment with saxagliptin had lower total all-cause healthcare costs and diabetes-related medical costs over 1 year compared with patients initiating treatment with linagliptin.     

Early initiation of long-acting injectable antipsychotic treatment is associated with lower hospitalization rates and healthcare costs in patients with schizophrenia: real-world evidence from US claims data

Objective: Early initiation of antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia is associated with improved outcomes. This study aimed to determine if initiation of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic treatment early in a new schizophrenia episode is associated with lower hospitalization rates and healthcare costs in a real-world setting.

Methods: This retrospective (January 1, 2007–June 30, 2016) cohort analysis used claims from Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare Supplemental databases. In adults ≥18?years with a new episode of schizophrenia, two mutually exclusive cohorts were identified based on time from first recorded schizophrenia diagnosis date to first date of LAI initiation (index date): ≤1?year (early initiators) and >1?year (late initiators). Logistic and general linear regression models were performed to estimate adjusted hospitalization rate and healthcare costs in a 1-year follow-up, controlling patient demographic and clinical characteristics, insurance type, baseline all-cause hospitalizations and ED visits, and baseline psychiatric medication use.

Results: Of the subjects, 32% (n?=?1388) initiated treatment early and 68% (n?=?2978) initiated treatment later. In risk-adjusted models, all-cause hospitalization rates were 22.2% (95% CI?=?19.9–24.6%) in early initiators and 26.9% (95% CI?=?25.2–28.7%) in late initiators (p?=?.002). Of early initiators, 14.1% (95% CI?=?12.3–16.1%) had a psychiatric hospitalization vs 19.2% (95% CI?=?17.7–20.8%) of late initiators (p?<?.001). Adjusted psychiatric healthcare costs were significantly lower in early initiators compared with late initiators [mean (95% CI)?=?$21,545 (20,355–22,734) vs $24,132 (23,330–24,933)] (p?<?.001).

Conclusions: LAI initiation within 1 year of a new schizophrenia episode led to lower hospitalization rates and healthcare costs compared with LAI initiation more than 1 year after a new episode.     

Treatment patterns,overall survival,healthcare resource use and costs in elderly Medicare beneficiaries with chronic myeloid leukemia using second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors as second-line therapy

Objective Though the median age at diagnosis is 64 years, few studies focus on elderly (≥65 years) patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This study examines healthcare outcomes among elderly Medicare beneficiaries with CML who started nilotinib or dasatinib after imatinib.

Research design and methods Patients were identified in the Medicare Research Identifiable Files (2006–2012) and had continuous Medicare Parts A, B, and D coverage.

Main outcome measures Treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), monthly healthcare resource utilization and medical costs were measured from the second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) initiation (index date) to end of Medicare coverage.

Results Despite similar adherence, dasatinib patients (N?=?379) were more likely to start on the recommended dose (74% vs. 53%; p?<?0.001), and to have dose reductions (21% vs. 11%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR]?=?1.94; p?=?0.002) or dose increases (9% vs. 7%; adjusted HR?=?1.81; p?=?0.048) than nilotinib patients (N?=?280). Fewer nilotinib patients discontinued (59% vs. 67%; adjusted HR?=?0.80; p?=?0.026) or switched to another TKI (21% vs. 29%; adjusted HR?=?0.72; p?=?0.044) than dasatinib patients. Nilotinib patients had longer median OS (>4.9 years vs. 4.0 years; p?=?0.032) and 37% lower mortality risk than dasatinib patients (adjusted HR?=?0.63; p?=?0.008). Nilotinib patients had 23% fewer inpatient admissions, 30% fewer emergency room visits, 13% fewer outpatient visits (all p?<?0.05), and lower monthly medical costs (by $513, p?=?0.024) than dasatinib patients.

Limitations Lack of clinical assessment (disease phase and response to first-line therapy) and retrospective nature of study (unobservable potential confounding factors, non-randomized treatment choice).

Conclusions In the current study of elderly CML patients, initiation of second-line TKIs frequently occurs at doses lower than the recommended starting doses and, despite this, many patients require dose adjustments. Here, nilotinib patients required fewer dose adjustments than dasatinib patients. Further research focusing on elderly CML patients is warranted in order to help define future best clinical practices.     

Safety,effectiveness, and health care cost comparisons among elderly patients with venous thromboembolism prescribed warfarin or apixaban in the United States Medicare population

Abstract

Objective: To compare safety, effectiveness, and healthcare costs of major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and all-cause hospitalization among elderly Medicare VTE patients prescribed warfarin vs apixaban.

Methods: Using 100% Medicare data, elderly patients prescribed apixaban or warfarin within 30 days after a VTE encounter were identified. Patients had continuous health plan enrollment and no parenteral or oral anticoagulant use ≤6 months preceding the VTE encounter. Cohorts were balanced using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk of MB, CRNM bleeding, recurrent VTE, and all-cause hospitalization. Generalized linear and two-part models were used to estimate MB-, recurrent VTE-, and all-cause related costs (per patient per month [PPPM]).

Results: In the pre-matched cohort, 25,284 (66.9%) patients were prescribed warfarin and 12,515 (33.1%) apixaban. After 1:1 PSM, 11,363 matched pairs of apixaban-warfarin patients were included for a mean follow-up of 4.0 and 4.4 months, respectively. Matched cohorts had a mean age of 78 years and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 2.9. Warfarin was associated with a higher risk of MB (hazard ratio [HR]?=?1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?1.10–1.57) and CRNM bleeding (HR?=?1.31; 95% CI?=?1.19–1.43) vs apixaban. The risks of recurrent VTE (HR?=?0.96; 95% CI?=?0.70–1.33) and all-cause hospitalization (HR?=?1.05; 95% CI?=?0.99–1.12) were similar among warfarin and apixaban patients. Warfarin patients had higher MB-related ($147 vs $75; p?=?.003) and all-cause costs PPPM ($3,267 vs $3,033; p?<?.001), but similar recurrent VTE-related medical costs PPPM ($30 vs $36; p?=?.516) vs apixaban patients.

Conclusions: Warfarin was associated with significantly higher risk of MB and CRNM bleeding as well as higher MB-related and all-cause costs vs apixaban patients. Recurrent VTE risk and costs were similar among warfarin and apixaban patients.     

Warfarin time in therapeutic range and its impact on healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Background:

Warfarin is efficacious for reducing stroke risk among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, the efficacy and safety of warfarin are influenced by its time in therapeutic range (TTR).

Objective:

To assess differences in healthcare resource utilization and costs among NVAF patients with low (<60%) and high (≥60%) warfarin TTRs in an integrated delivery network (IDN) setting.

Methods:

Patients with NVAF were identified from an electronic medical record database. Patients were required to have ≥6 international normalized prothrombin time ratio (INR) tests. NVAF patients were grouped into two cohorts: those with warfarin TTR <60% (low TTR) and those with warfarin TTR ≥60% (high TTR). Healthcare resource utilization and costs were evaluated during a 12 month follow-up period. Multivariable regressions were used to assess the impact of different warfarin TTRs on healthcare costs.

Results:

Among the study population, greater than half (54%, n?=?1595) had a low TTR, and 46% (n?=?1356) had a high TTR. Total all-cause healthcare resource utilization was higher among patients in the low TTR cohort vs. the high TTR cohort (number of encounters: 70.2 vs. 56.1, p?<?0.001). After adjusting for patient characteristics, total all-cause healthcare costs and stroke-related healthcare costs were $2398 (p?<?0.001) and $687 (p?=?0.02) higher, respectively, for patients in the low TTR cohort vs. the high TTR cohort.

Limitations:

In this retrospective study, we were only able to evaluate the association and not the causality between healthcare resource utilization and costs with the different warfarin TTRs.

Conclusion:

Many warfarin-treated NVAF patients have a low warfarin TTR. NVAF patients with low vs. patients with high warfarin TTR used healthcare resources to a greater extent, which was reflected in higher healthcare costs.     

Transitioning from oral risperidone or paliperidone to once-monthly paliperidone palmitate: a real-world analysis among Veterans Health Administration patients with schizophrenia who have had at least one prior hospitalization

Abstract

Objective: To address gaps in the literature on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among patients with schizophrenia and prior hospitalization who transition from oral risperidone or paliperidone (oral ris/pali) to once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) in a real-world setting by comparing treatment patterns, HRU, and costs 12-months pre- and post-transition to PP1M among Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients affected by schizophrenia who have had ≥1 hospitalization.

Methods: VHA patients with schizophrenia (aged ≥18?years) who initiated oral ris/pali, had ≥1 all-cause inpatient stay, and transitioned to PP1M from January 2015–March 2017 were included from the VHA database. The first transition date to PP1M was identified as the index date. Patients were required to have continuous health plan eligibility for 12?months pre- and post-PP1M. Outcomes were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar’s test, as appropriate.

Results: The study included 319 patients (mean [SD] age?=?51.6 [4.2] years) during 12 months of baseline and follow-up. During pre-PP1M transition, 7.2% of the patients were adherent (proportion of days covered [PDC]?≥?80%) to oral ris/pali. Post-PP1M transition, 27.6% of the patients were adherent to PP1M. Comparison of HRU outcomes from the pre- to post-PP1M transition revealed significantly lower all-cause inpatient stays (3.5 vs 1.4, p?<?.0001) and shorter inpatient length of stay (43.4 vs 18.3?days, p?<?.0001). Similar trends were seen for mental health and schizophrenia-related HRU. Cost outcome comparison indicated significantly lower all-cause inpatient costs ($64,702 vs $24,147, p?<?.0001), total medical costs ($87,917 vs $56,947, p?<?.0001), and total costs ($91,181 vs $69,106, p?<?.0001). A similar trend was observed for mental health and schizophrenia-related costs.

Conclusions: Transitioning from oral ris/pali to PP1M may significantly improve HRU and provide potential cost savings in VHA patients with schizophrenia and ≥1 prior hospitalization.     

A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled study of escitalopram in patients with social anxiety disorder in Japan

Objective This randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram (10 and 20?mg/day) in Japanese patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD).

Research design and methods Patients aged 18–64 years with a primary diagnosis of DSM-IV-TR defined SAD, a Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Japanese version (LSAS-J) total score ≥60 and a Clinical Global Impression–Severity (CGI-S) score ≥4 at baseline were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to placebo, escitalopram 10?mg or escitalopram 20?mg. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to Week 12 in the LSAS-J total score for both escitalopram 10?mg and 20?mg versus placebo (ANCOVA, FAS, LOCF), using a hierarchical testing procedure. Pre-specified secondary endpoints included LSAS-J sensitivity analyses.

Clinical trial registration This study has the www.japic.or.jp identifier: JapicCTI-121842.

Results For the primary efficacy endpoint, the difference from placebo in the LSAS-J was ?3.9 (p?=?0.089) for escitalopram 10?mg. Since the superiority of escitalopram 10?mg over placebo was not confirmed, an analysis without multiplicity adjustment was made, which showed a difference for escitalopram 20?mg versus placebo of ?9.8 (p?<?0.001). In pre-specified sensitivity analyses, the difference versus placebo was ?4.9 (p?=?0.035) (ANCOVA, FAS, OC) and ?5.0 (p?=?0.028) (MMRM, FAS) (escitalopram 10?mg) and ?10.1 (p?<?0.001) (ANCOVA, FAS, OC) and ?10.6 (p?<?0.001) (MMRM, FAS) (escitalopram 20?mg). Common adverse events (incidence ≥5% and significantly different from placebo) were somnolence, nausea and ejaculation disorder.

Conclusion Escitalopram was efficacious, safe and well tolerated by patients with SAD in Japan. Study limitations are discussed including patient characteristics.     

Hospitalization costs and resource allocation in cholecystectomy with use of intravenous versus oral acetaminophen

Objective: To evaluate intravenous (IV) acetaminophen (APAP) vs oral APAP use as adjunctive analgesics in cholecystectomy patients by comparing associated hospital length of stay (LOS), hospital costs, opioid use, and rates of nausea/vomiting, respiratory depression, and bowel obstruction.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Premier Database (January 2012 to September 2015) including cholecystectomy patients who received either IV APAP or oral APAP. Differences in LOS, hospitalization costs, mean daily morphine equivalent dose (MED), and potential opioid-related adverse events were estimated. Multivariable logistic regression was performed for the binary outcomes and instrumental variable regressions, using the quarterly rate of IV APAP use for all hospitalizations by hospital as the instrument in two-stage least squares regressions for continuous outcomes. Models were adjusted for patient demographics, clinical risk factors, and hospital characteristics.

Results: Among 61,017 cholecystectomy patients, 31,133 (51%) received IV APAP. Subjects averaged 51 and 57 years of age, respectively, in the IV and oral APAP cohorts. In the adjusted models, IV APAP was associated with 0.42 days shorter LOS (95% CI?=?–0.58 to –0.27; p?p?p?=?.0005), and lower rates of respiratory depression (odds ratio [OR]?=?0.89, 95% CI?=?0.82–0.97; p?=?.006), and nausea and vomiting (OR?=?0.86, 95% CI?=?0.86–0.86; p?Conclusions: In patients having cholecystectomy, the addition of IV APAP to perioperative pain management is associated with shorter LOS, lower costs, reduced opioid use, and less frequent nausea/vomiting and respiratory depression compared to oral APAP. These findings should be confirmed in a prospective study comparing IV and oral APAP.     

Real-world costs of ischemic stroke by discharge status

Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate the acute healthcare costs of ischemic stroke during hospitalization and the quarterly all-cause healthcare costs for the first year after discharge by discharge status.

Methods: Adult patients with a hospitalization with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke (ICD-9-CM: 434.xx or 436.xx) between 1 January 2006 and 31 March 2015 were identified from a large US commercial claims database. Patients were classified into three cohorts based on their discharge status from the first stroke hospitalization, i.e. dead at discharge, discharged with disability, or discharged without disability. Third-party (medical and pharmacy) and out-of-pocket costs were adjusted to 2015 USD.

Results: A total of 7919 patients dead at discharge, 45,695 patients discharged with disability, and 153,778 patients discharged without disability were included in this analysis. The overall average age was 59.7 years and 52.3% were male. During hospitalization, mean total costs (third-party and out-of-pocket) were $68,370 for patients dead at discharge, $73,903 for patients discharged with disability, and $24,448 for patients discharged without disability (p?p?p?p?Conclusion: The results demonstrated the high economic burden of ischemic stroke, especially among patients discharged with disability with the highest costs incurred during the inpatient stays.     

Continuation with apixaban treatment is associated with lower risk for hospitalization and medical costs among elderly patients

Objective: To compare the risk of hospitalization and costs associated with major bleeding (MB) or stroke/systemic embolism (SE) among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who initiated apixaban then switched to another oral anticoagulant (OAC) vs. those who continued with apixaban treatment.

Methods: NVAF patients (≥65?years) initiating apixaban were identified from the Humana database (1 January 2013–30 September 2017) and grouped into switcher and continuer cohorts. For switchers, the earliest switch from apixaban to another OAC was defined as the index event/date. A random date during apixaban treatment was selected as the index date for continuers. Patients were followed from index date to health plan disenrollment or 31 December 2017, whichever was earlier. Multivariable regression analyses were used to examine the association of switchers vs. continuers with risk of MB-related or stroke/SE-related hospitalization and healthcare costs during follow-up.

Results: Of 7858 elderly NVAF patients included in the study, 14% (N?=?1110; mean age: 78?years) were switchers; 86% (N?=?6748; mean age: 79?years) were continuers. Apixaban switchers vs. continuers had significantly greater risk of MB-related hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.52–2.64; p?<?.001) during follow-up; risk of stroke/SE hospitalization did not differ significantly (HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.89–2.06, p?=?.154). MB- and stroke/SE-related medical costs were higher for switchers vs. continuers, although total all-cause healthcare costs were similar.

Conclusion: Elderly patients with NVAF in the US who continued with apixaban treatment had a lower risk of MB-related hospitalization and lower MB- and stroke/SE-related medical costs compared to patients who switched to another OAC.     

Anemia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: epidemiology and economic implications

ABSTRACT

Background: Anemia in chronic illness is associated with increased healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs. In COPD, it occurs frequently and influences both clinical and economic outcomes. Because no data studies have been performed either in a single center or a subpopula­tion of COPD patients, anemia's influence on the outcomes is not fully understood.

Research design and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a large healthcare database to quantify prevalence, HRU and costs of anemia in COPD. From 1997 to 2005, patients ≥?45 years of age with an ICD-9 diagnosis code for COPD and >?3.5 years of follow-up were included. Anemia was defined by the WHO criteria. Other disease states for which anemia is a known complication were excluded. We calculated the prevalence of anemia and compared annual HRU and costs between COPD patients with and without anemia. Multiple regression analysis adjusted for the effects of age, gender, race, length of enrollment, diagnosing physician specialty, co-morbidity burden, anemia and COPD severity.

Results: Of the 2404 patients with COPD, 33% (n = 788) had a diagnosis of anemia. Anemic patients were older, more likely to be male and non-Caucasian, and had a greater co-morbidity burden than non-anemic individuals. Annual costs for COPD patients with anemia were more than twice those for patients without anemia ($17?240 vs. 6492, p < 0.001, unadjusted). HRU was also significantly greater among anemic than non-anemic COPD patients (?p < 0.0001). In a multiple regression analysis, anemia accounted for $7929 per patient (95% CI: $5572–10?599) of the total costs of care.

Limitations: This is a retrospective cohort study and thus subject to multiple forms of bias. Although spirometric evidence of COPD was available only for a subgroup of patients, our case identification methods have been previously validated and found to be accurate in recognizing COPD.

Conclusions: Anemia is a common co-morbidity in COPD. It is significantly associated with an increase in HRU and costs of care for COPD, independent of demographic and clinical patient characteristics.     

Patient characteristics,drug adherence patterns,and hypoglycemia costs for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus newly initiated on exenatide or insulin glargine

ABSTRACT

Objective: Examine real-world effectiveness and hypoglycemia cost burden in patients with type?2 diabetes newly initiated on exenatide or insulin glargine.

Design and methods: Retrospective cohort study describing patient characteristics, drug adherence patterns, and 1-year hypoglycemia rates with associated costs using an administrative claims database. Adult subjects with type?2 diabetes had an initial claim for exenatide or insulin glargine between May?1, 2005 and June?30, 2007, and had continuous eligibility for ≥?6 months pre- and ≥?12 months post-initiation.

Results: The exenatide cohort (n?=?3262) was 53?±?10?years (±SD); 54% female. The insulin glargine cohort (n?=?3038) was 56?±?12?years; 41% female. The mean Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index score was 1.45 for exenatide versus 1.82 for insulin glargine (p?<?0.001). Baseline OAD use rates for exenatide and insulin glargine, respectively, were 77% versus 69% metformin; 47% versus 65% sulfonylurea; 50% versus 49% thiazolidinedione; 56% versus 60% multiple OAD. For patients with two or more pharmacy claims for exenatide or insulin glargine, the 12-month medication possession ratio (MPR) was 68?±?29% for exenatide and 58?±?28% for insulin glargine (p?<?0.001). MPR ≥?80% was higher for exenatide (p?<?0.001) and fewer patients discontinued therapy (p?<?0.001). The probability of a hypoglycemic event was significantly lower for exenatide (p?<?0.005), resulting in lower associated annual costs.

Conclusions: This study provides the first real-world observational comparison of type?2 diabetes patients newly initiated on exenatide or insulin glargine. Exenatide patients had a lower comorbidity burden, better drug adherence, and a lower rate of hypoglycemic events with associated costs. Retrospective database analyses examine medical care utilization in large populations using a relatively inexpensive and expedient approach. However, data are only representative of a commercial health-care plan with limited information on multiple variables usually collected during clinical trials.