马来酸噻吗洛尔与布林佐胺联合曲伏前列素治疗开角型青光眼和高眼压症临床研究

目的对比评价马来酸噻吗洛尔与布林佐胺联合曲伏前列素治疗开角型青光眼和高眼压症的临床疗效。方法将我院使用曲伏前列素单药治疗效果不佳的开角型青光眼与高眼压的76例患者分为S组和B组,S组38例(38眼)患者在曲伏前列素基础上合用马来酸噻吗洛尔治疗,B组38例(38眼)患者则合用布林佐胺治疗,于2周和1、3、6个月随访。对比观察两组治疗前后的平均眼压、昼夜眼压差、心率、血压和不良反应发生情况。结果两组患者在联合用药后2周和1、3、6个月平均眼压下降,与治疗前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);S组联合用药后6个月昼夜眼压差较B组大,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者在联合用药前后血压均无明显变化(P>0.05);B组患者心率在联合用药前后无明显变化(P>0.05),S组患者心率则在随访6个月时出现明显心脏抑制(P<0.05);两组均未出现严重不良反应。结论马来酸噻吗洛尔与布林佐胺联合曲伏前列素治疗开角型青光眼和高眼压疗效显著,布林佐胺联合曲伏前列素用药相对更稳定、更安全。     

Concomitant administration of travoprost and brinzolamide versus fixed latanoprost/timolol combined therapy: three-month comparison of efficacy and safety

SUMMARY

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of the concomitant administration of travoprost 0.004% once daily and brinzolamide 0.1% twice daily with those of a fixed combination of latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% once daily.

Research, design and methods: Forty-four patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension with elevated IOP insufficiently responsive to monotherapy were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups: concomitant administration of travoprost 0.004% once daily and brinzolamide 0.1% twice daily (TB group: 22 patients) or latanoprost 0.005% plus timolol 0.5% once daily (LT group: 22 patients). Visits were undertaken at screening (current ocular hypotensive therapy was discontinued), baseline (randomization), and after 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months of therapy.

Main outcome measures: IOP was determined at 9 a.m., 12 p.m. and 4 p.m. at each study visit, and diurnal IOP was calculated as the mean of these recordings. Adverse events were recorded at each visit.

Results: IOP at the baseline visit was similar in both groups. Overall mean IOP was significantly lower in the TB as compared to the LT group after 1?month, 2?month and 3?month follow-up; only 9 a.m. measurements were significantly different, reaching a maximum difference (16.9 ± 0.9?mmHg vs 18.4 ± 1.8?mmHg, p < 0.001) at the 3?month check. The percentage of responders (IOP decrease ≥ 30%) was higher in the TB group. Both treatments were well tolerated and there were no cases of withdrawal from treatment.

Conclusions: Travoprost 0.004% and brinzolamide 0.1% concomitant therapy showed a greater efficacy than the fixed latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% combination in terms of absolute IOP decreases. Travoprost/brinzolamide therapy also offered the advantages of a greater percentage of responders.     

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of travoprost with a fixed-combination of dorzolamide and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare travoprost (TRAV; travoprost 0.004%) and the fixed-combination of dorzolamide/timolol (DTFC; dorzolamide 2.0%/timolol maleate 0.5%) ophthalmic solutions for reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).

Methods: This was a randomized single masked, study with parallel controls. The TRAV group (n = 29) dosed once daily at 9:00 PM while the DTFC group (n = 27) dosed twice daily at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM. IOP was measured at baseline, and following 3 weeks and 6 weeks of treatment at 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 4:00 PM, and 8:00 PM.

Results: Mean average IOP reductions from baseline during the course of the day were 7.5 (32.7%) and 7.1 (30.7%)?mmHg for TRAV and 4.8 (23.1%) and 4.5 (21.7%)?mmHg for DTFC at 3 weeks and 6 weeks, respectively. The greater IOP reduction for patients receiving TRAV was statistically significant at both the 3 and 6 week visits when averaged across all four time points (?p < 0.01). The two products were well-tolerated over the course of the 6 week study. Some factors such as taste perversion were reported more often in the DTFC group.

Conclusions: Travoprost monotherapy provided better efficacy in terms of IOP reduction and per-centage of IOP reduction compared to dorzolamide 2.0%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination.     

Analytic review of bimatoprost,latanoprost and travoprost in primary open angle glaucoma

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this review was to evaluate different measures of efficacy of the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering lipid class agents bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma. Study arms of timolol in trials including the above mentioned lipid class drugs were also included.

Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for randomized clinical trials including one or more of the lipid class drugs bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost. The study results were pooled, and the simple, weighted IOP-lowering efficacy was compared among the lipid class drugs and timolol, where data were available. Efficacy parameters were reviewed, including mean reduction of IOP and percentage of patients achieving different levels of IOP.

Results: 161 articles were identified of which 42 were included in the analysis. A total of 9295 patients participated in the included trials. Based on all studies, timolol on average had a weighted mean IOP reduction of 22.2%, while latanoprost, travoprost and bimatoprost had a weighted mean IOP reduction of 26.7%, 28.7% and 30.3%, respectively. Analysis of target achievement to various IOP levels shows that bimatoprost seems more efficacious than latanoprost. The direct comparisons (head-to-head studies) also show that bimatoprost is the most efficacious treatment, however it is not conclusive whether latanoprost or travoprost is better in reducing IOP.

Conclusions: This review shows that bimatoprost seems to be the most efficacious treatment in lowering IOP. Head-to-head studies confirm this.     

Intraocular pressure decrease with preservative-free fixed and unfixed combination of tafluprost and timolol in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma

We investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering efficacy of preservative-free fixed and non-fixed combination of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (XFG). A per protocol worse eye analysis was made on all XFG patients who participated in a recent 6 month, prospective, randomized, double-masked, parallel group, multicenter phase III study. The mean time-wise IOP decreased by 8.62 to 10.25?mmHg (31.8 to 36.7%) in the fixed dose combination arm (15 patients) and by 5.38 to 11.35?mmHg (21.3 to 41.2%) in the non-fixed combination arm (13 patients), respectively (p?相似文献   

Brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5%: safety and efficacy of a new fixed-combination IOP-lowering product for glaucoma

Abstract

Objective:

To provide a commentary on recent studies with the new IOP-lowering fixed-combination product brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5%.     

Ocular hypotensive efficacy of travoprost in patients unsuccessfully treated with latanoprost

SUMMARY

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of travoprost 0.004% monotherapy in patients unsuccessfully treated with latanoprost monotherapy.

Research design and methods: Open-label, non-comparative study conducted at US academic and private practice clinics in adult patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma who required a change in therapy (due to either inadequate efficacy or safety issues) as judged by the investigator. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at entry and 30?days later.

Main outcome measures: Mean change in intra-ocular pressure (mm Hg).

Results: Reported here are 488 per-protocol patients from 330 centers who were using latanoprost monotherapy prior to study entry, and who received travoprost monotherapy during the study. Patients had a mean age of 69?years, were approximately two-thirds Caucasian, 60% female, predominantly brown or blue eyes, and 91% were diagnosed as having primary open-angle glaucoma. The mean days in treatment were 31.9 ± 6.4. Mean IOP at study entry was 21.2?mm Hg. Following travoprost monotherapy, this was reduced by a mean of 3.2?mm Hg to 18?mm Hg (?p < 0.0001, paired t-test). There were 21 adverse events reported in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population for an incidence of 3.5%. There were some limitations to the current study including: no washout period, no control therapy, single IOP determinations at the beginning and the end of the study; patient compliance with the initial therapy was not measured, and the study was not masked. This study reflects a real-life situation of what a clinician can expect when he changes a patient from latanoprost monotherapy to travoprost monotherapy.

Conclusion: This study showed that travoprost provided a statistically and clinically significant reduction (?p < 0.0001) in IOP of 3.2?mm Hg for patients who had not been successfully treated with latanoprost monotherapy. The results of this trial demonstrate the potential benefit of using travoprost as a replacement therapy in order to ensure adequate IOP control.     

Comparison of ocular hypotensive actions of fixed combinations of brimonidine/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol

Abstract

Objective:

To compare brimonidine/timolol fixed combination (BrTFC; Combigan with dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC; Cosopt in terms of ability to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).     

Influence of switching to travoprost on intraocular pressure of uncontrolled chronic open-angle glaucoma patients compliant to previously-used topical medication

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the influence of switching to travoprost on intraocular pressure (IOP) of chronic open-angle glaucoma (COAG) patients.

Research design and methods: Multicentre, open-label, non-comparative, 12‐week, phase IV study conducted at 10 academic and hospital centres in Hungary. Patients’ compliance to use of the pre-study medication was confirmed at a visit 10 days before the baseline measurements, and compliance was monitored throughout the study period.

Results: Of the 203 COAG patients three (1.48%) ceased travoprost medication due to ocular hyperaemia, and one subject was lost from follow-up. Self-reported compliance was optimal except for two patients. For the per-protocol analysis 197 patients were evaluable. IOP of the 37 per-protocol patients receiving additional travoprost medication decreased from 23.1 ± 3.2?mmHg (mean ± SD) to 17.3 ± 2.6?mmHg at week 12 (?p < 0.001). Switching the 121 per-protocol patients from latanoprost to travoprost IOP decrease from 20.8 ± 3.5?mmHg to 17.7 ± 2.4?mmHg (?p < 0.001). IOP of the 11 patients switched from topical non-selective beta-blockers to travoprost decreased from 20.1 ± 2.1?mmHg to 15.7 ± 1.5?mmHg (?p < 0.001). For the whole per-protocol population (n = 197) IOP decreased from 21.0 ± 3.4?mmHg to 17.4 ± 2.4?mmHg (?p < 0.001). Defining responders as having an IOP decrease > 2.0?mmHg or ≥ 5?mmHg at week 12, the responder rate was respectively 62.9% or 31% for the total study population; 86.5% or 54.1% when travoprost was added to the established therapy; 54.5% or 24.0% if latanoprost was switched to travoprost; and 90.9% or 36.4% for those who switched from beta-blockers.

Conclusion: Travoprost provided a clinically and statistically significant IOP decrease in uncontrolled COAG patients whose self-reported compliance to their previous topical medication was optimal. Our results suggest that the IOP reduction found after switching to travoprost is not explainable by improved compliance due to the clinical study situation.     

A complex interaction between topical verapamil and timolol on intraocular pressure in conscious rabbits

Calcium channel blockers have complex actions on aqueous humour dynamics that seem to depend on the route of drug administration. When applied topically, verapamil and nifedipine effectively lower intraocular pressure. However, these drugs also produce a slight reduction in aqueous humor outflow through the trabecular meshwork whereby they could modify the effect of other drugs on intraocular pressure. As calcium channel blockers could be effective in the management of ocular hypertension and low-tension glaucoma, the aim of the present work was to assess the interaction between verapamil and timolol when both drugs are topically applied to the eye of albino rabbits.Intraocular pressure was measured with a manual applanation tonometer. The effects of 5–6 different doses of each drug alone and the effects of five mixtures of both drugs at fixed concentration ratios (timolol: verapamil 4:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2 and 1:4) were evaluated. After measuring baseline intraocular pressure, one 50 l drop of the different solutions was instilled in the left eye. Measures of the intraocular pressure were repeated at intervals of 30 min until the maximal effect was reached. Each set of experiments was carried out in a group of 9–11 rabbits. Dose-response curves were fitted with a nonlinear regression microcomputer programme. The median effect plot was constructed as proposed by Chou and Talalay (1981, 1983, 1984). In order to analyse the nature of the interaction between both drugs, the observed effect was compared with the theoretically expected one and the combination indices, that relate the doses of verapamil and timolol present in the mixtures with the doses of both drugs separately which are equieffective with the combination, were calculated.The effects of verapamil and timolol followed the principle of the mass action law when administered alone. Nevertheless, no adequate dose-response relationship was obtained when the mixtures of both drugs were applied. In general, the observed effects were lower than the expected ones. Combination indices also indicate the presence of antagonism, except for the lowest concentrations of mixtures where verapamil predominates. In this case, combination indices suggest summation of effects or synergy. Both drugs seem to decrease intraocular pressure by reducing aqueous humor secretion through different mechanisms. However, due to the reduction of aqueous humor outflow caused by verapamil, the ocular hypotensive effect of timolol may be antagonized when high doses of verapamil are administered.     

The cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost,latanoprost and timolol in treatment of primary open angle glaucoma in five European countries

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this cost-effectiveness analysis is to evaluate cost-effectiveness ratios of the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering agents bimatoprost, latanoprost and timolol in five major European countries: France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK.

Methods: The cost-effectiveness analysis is based on achievement of IOP targets between 13 and 18?mm Hg. Thus, the cost-effectiveness ratios express the costs of having one patient successfully achieving IOP target. The perspective of the analysis is that of the health care sector payer, including costs of medicine and costs of ophthalmologist visits. The time frame is first year of glaucoma treatment. Four treatment strategies are analysed: Timolol as first line with add-on latanoprost or bimatoprost if IOP targets are not met, and latanoprost and bimatoprost as first line with add-on timolol.

Results: In the UK, Spain, Italy and Germany the timolol first with add-on of bimatoprost is the least expensive treatment. This strategy dominates both strategies involving latanoprost (as add-on to timolol or as first line) in these four countries. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of bimatoprost first-line therapy versus timolol with add-on bimatoprost varies from each country and target (from £305 to €43 720 per patient). In France the timolol first line and latanoprost add-on is not dominated and is the cheapest alternative. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of timolol with add-on bimatoprost versus add-on latanoprost lies between £71 and €355 per patient depending on target (18 and 13?mm Hg, respectively).

Conclusion: First-line treatment of latanoprost is dominated in all countries. In four out of five countries the timolol first-line therapy with add-on latanoprost is also dominated. Based on this pharmacoeconomic analysis, the most costeffective strategy seems to be timolol first line with add-on bimatoprost if target is not met after 3 months.     

拉坦前列素滴眼液与其复合剂的降眼压作用的比较

目的：评价0.005%拉坦前列素滴眼液＋0.5%噻吗洛尔滴眼液治疗原发性开角形青光眼患者的替代降眼压作用及其安全性。方法应用0.005%拉坦前列素滴眼液单一治疗的原发性开角型青光眼患者31例,给予0.005%拉坦前列素滴眼液＋0.5%噻吗洛尔滴眼液替代治疗。每晚点药1次,每次1滴。将连续点药后4、8、12周的眼压与基线眼压进行比较研究,同时观察血压、心率等全身及局部不良反应。结果0.005%拉坦前列素滴眼液＋0.5%噻吗洛尔滴眼液可以更有效降低眼压。连续点药4、8、12周后,与基线相比,眼压分别额外下降（2.2±1.1）mmHg、（2.0±0.9）mmHg、（2.2±1.0）mmHg,差异均具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。连续点药4、8、12周后,获得至少2mmHg眼压下降值的患者百分率分别为64.5%、61.3%、64.5%。心动过缓（3.2%）是最严重的不良反应。结论0.005%拉坦前列素＋0.5%噻吗洛尔复方滴眼液能够更加有效的降低目标眼压,可以作为0.005%拉坦前列素滴眼液的替代治疗手段。     

曲伏前列腺素和卡巴胆碱对白内障超声乳化加人工晶状体植入术后24h眼压的影响

目的观察曲伏前列腺素和卡巴胆碱对白内障超声乳化加人工晶状体植入术后24 h眼压的影响。方法 2011年3月至2013年3月我科室行白内障超声乳化加人工晶状体植入术患者150例,150眼,随机分为A、B、C 3组。A组患者在手术前1 h于结膜囊内滴入曲伏前列腺素眼液1滴,B组患者术毕关闭切口前于前房内注射卡巴胆碱0.2 mL,C组患者术毕关闭切口前于前房注射卡巴胆碱0.2 mL,手术前于结膜囊内滴入曲伏前列腺素眼液1滴。测量并比较所有患者术前12 h及术后12、24 h眼内压力。结果与单用组(A、B组)相比,术后12 h,联合用药组(C组)眼压升高幅度最小,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后24 h,联合用药组患者眼压下降幅度最大,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论曲伏前列腺素和卡巴胆碱联合用药在预防超声乳化人工晶体植入术后24 h内眼压升高起到了良好的协同作用,值得临床推广。     

Brimonidine purite 0.1% versus brinzolamide 1% as adjunctive therapy to latanoprost in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of brimonidine purite 0.1% in comparison to brinzolamide 1% when used as adjunctive therapy to latanoprost 0.005% in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Methods: Randomized, single-center, investigator-masked, parallel-group clinical study. Patients with IOP?≥?18?mmHg while on once-daily latanoprost were randomized to adjunctive treatment with brimonidine purite TID (n?=?20) or brinzolamide TID (n?=?20) for 3 months. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at 8 a.m., 10 a.m., and 4 p.m. at latanoprost-treated baseline and after 1 and 3 months of latanoprost and adjunctive therapy. A patient questionnaire was administered to evaluate the tolerability of eye drop instillation.

Results: Baseline mean diurnal IOP (± standard deviation, mmHg) on latanoprost was comparable between groups (brimonidine purite: 19.6?±?2.94; brinzolamide: 19.8?±?3.25; p = 0.846). Mean diurnal IOP at Month 3 was 16.3?±?2.63?mmHg with brimonidine purite and 17.8?±?2.19?mmHg with brinzolamide (?p = 0.028). Adjunctive use of brimonidine purite provided greater IOP lowering than brinzolamide at 10 a.m. (?p < 0.001) and 4 p.m. (?p = 0.050) and equivalent IOP lowering to brinzolamide at 8 a.m. (?p = 0.716). Blurred vision at Month 1 and bitter taste at Months 1 and 3 were more common upon instillation of brinzolamide eye drops.

Conclusion: Brimonidine purite 0.1% provided significantly lower IOP compared with brinzolamide 1% when used as adjunctive therapy to latanoprost. Both adjunctive therapies were well tolerated. Limitations of this study include the use of a single site and the sample size. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate these drugs as adjunctive therapy to prostaglandin analogs.     

24-hour control of intraocular pressure with 2% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed-combination ophthalmic solution in open-angle glaucoma*

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the 24-hour efficacy and tolerability of 2% dorzolamide/0.5% timolol fixed combination (DTFC) solution in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Research design and methods: Randomized, parallel, doublemasked, multicenter study. Patients with insufficiently controlled intraocular pressure (IOP≥22 mmHg) were randomized to DTFC (N=117) or timolol (N=115). IOP was measured at baseline, 6 weeks, and 8 weeks, with measurements taken at 6 p.m., 8 p.m., 10 p.m., 2 a.m., 6 a.m., 8 a.m., 10 a.m., and 2 p.m.

Main outcome measures: Statistically significant change in IOP from untreated baseline for DTFC at all hours at week 8. Secondary outcome measures included: IOP-lowering at week 6 at all individual time points, change from baseline to 8 weeks in mean daytime IOP (average of 8 a.m., 10 a.m., 2 p.m., 6 p.m., and 8 p.m. IOPs) and night-time IOP (10 p.m., 2 a.m., 6 a.m.), and comparison of DTFC with timolol after 8 weeks.

Results: Patients receiving DTFC had a statistically significant and clinically relevant reduction in IOP at week 8 compared with baseline at all eight time points (p<0.001). Significant IOP reductions were also seen at all time points at week 6 (p<0.001). DTFC significantly lowered mean daytime IOP and night-time IOP (p<0.001 for both). Timolol alone also significantly reduced IOP from baseline at 8 weeks for all diurnal time points, and mean daytime and night-time IOP (p<0.001 for all). Compared with timolol alone, there were significantly greater reductions with DTFC at 10 a.m. (p=0.003) and 2 p.m. (p=0.016), and for mean daytime IOP (p=0.025) at 8 weeks. Significant between-treatment differences were not observed at other time points. Both treatments were well-tolerated, with no differences observed in the safety profiles between the treatment groups.

Conclusions: Both DTFC and timolol provided significant IOP reduction over the entire 24-hour measurement period. timolol during the daytime, but not at night. Although this study was not designed or powered to compare DTFC and timolol, DTFC exhibited greater IOP-lowering than timolol during the daytime, but not at night.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00108017.