The impact of racial and ethnic disparities in inhaled corticosteroid adherence on healthcare expenditures in adults with asthma

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine racial and ethnic disparities with the adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in adults with persistent asthma, and their association with healthcare expenditures.

Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 2013–2014 data included patients ≥18 years with persistent asthma. Median medication possession ratio (MPR) was used to dichotomize adherence levels. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to ascertain the association between adherence and race/ethnicity. Total expenditures and association with adherence were analyzed using a generalized linear model with a log link function and gamma distribution. Unadjusted expenditures were compared after bootstrapping.

Results: The average MPR of ICSs for the sample of 277 patients was 0.34. The average MPR level was 0.33 among whites, 0.37 among African-Americans and 0.35 among other minorities. The average MPR was 0.30 among Hispanics, and 0.35 among non-Hispanics. African-Americans were less likely to be adherent than whites (OR 0.95). Hispanics were less likely to be adherent (OR 0.4; CI 0.206–0.777). Higher adherence was associated with significantly higher total health expenditure than lower adherence ($19,223 vs. $12,840 respectively, p?<?.0001). African-Americans had slightly higher total expenditure compared to whites; however, other minorities had significantly lower health expenditures compared to whites (p?=?.01). Non-Hispanics spent significantly less on healthcare compared to Hispanics (p?=?.04).

Conclusions: Valuable insight into the economic cost of the disparities as they relate to persistent asthma provides further evidence of possible ethnic inequities that warrant addressing.     

Estimating the potential savings with vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a payer perspective*

ABSTRACT

Objective: To provide a formula estimating potential reductions in healthcare utilization costs with adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS Therapy^?) in treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

Methods: This payer-perspective formula incorporates costs of treatment as usual for TRD patients from a published analysis of the MarketScan private payer claims database and the 2004 Medicare 5% standard analytic file. Estimated remission and response rates are from the published VNS pilot and pivotal studies. Costs were converted to 2008 US dollars per the US Bureau of Labor Statistics medical care costs, consumer price index. Device and implantation costs were calculated at $28?336.

Results: From the MarketScan and pooled outcomes data (VNS pilot and pivotal studies), potential per patient savings (hospitalization directly and indirectly related to depression) was $2974 at 5 years of device life, $23?539 at 8 years (moderate cost reduction scenario); $12?914 at 5 years, $40?935 at 8 years (optimistic scenario). Corresponding break-even device life was 4.57 and 3.62 years, respectively. From the Medicare file and pooled outcomes, potential per patient savings (inpatient and outpatient directly and indirectly related to depression) was $8358 at 5 years of device life, $32?385 at 8 years (moderate scenario); $19?837 at 5 years, $52?473 at 8 years (optimistic scenario). Corresponding break-even device life was 3.96 and 3.18 years, respectively.

Conclusions: The formula allows an evaluation of expected reductions in healthcare costs as a function of input cost variables, efficacy rates, and benefit scenarios. Cited costs differ relative to care settings, diagnostic principles, and procedural volume. This formula can help assess moderate-to-longer-term economic benefits of VNS for a particular institution. Results suggested that potential reductions in healthcare costs with VNS for TRD may be substantial. Break-even device life for the scenarios presented ranges between 2.3 and 5.7 years.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00533832.     

The economic burden of fibromyalgia: comparative analysis with rheumatoid arthritis*

ABSTRACT

Objective: To quantify and compare direct costs, utilization, and the rate of comorbidities in a sample of patients with fibromyalgia (FM), a poorly understood illness associated with chronic widespread pain that is commonly treated by rheumatologists, to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a well studied rheumatologic illness associated with inflammatory joint pain. Patients with both illnesses were isolated and reported as a third group. A secondary analysis of work loss was performed for an employed subset of these patients.

Research design and methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of Thomson Reuters MarketScan administrative healthcare claims and employer-collected absence and disability data for adult patients with a diagnosis of FM (ICD-9-CM 729.1) and/or RA (ICD-9-CM 714.0x,–714.3x) on at least one inpatient or two outpatient claims during 2001–2004.

Main outcome measures: The 12-month healthcare utilization, expenditures, and rates of comorbidities were quantified for all study-eligible patients; absence and short-term disability days and costs were quantified for an employed subset.

Results: The sample included 14?034 FM, 7965 RA, and 331 FM?+?RA patients. Patients with FM had a higher prevalence of several comorbidities and greater emergency department (ED) utilization than those with RA. Mean annual expenditures for FM patients were $10?911 (SD?=?$16?075). RA patient annual expenditures were similar to FM: $10?716 (SD?= $16?860). Annual expenditures were almost double in patients with FM+RA ($19?395, SD?= $25?440). A greater proportion of patients with FM had any short-term disability days than those with RA (20 vs. 15%); and a greater proportion of patients with RA had any absence days (65 vs. 80%). Mean costs for absence from work and short-term disability in the FM and RA groups were substantial and similar. The FM+RA group was of insufficient sample size to report on work loss.

Limitations: The availability of newer and more expensive FDA-approved medications since 2004 is not reflected in our findings. This analysis was restricted to commercially insured patients and therefore may not be generalizable to the entire U.S. population.

Conclusions: The burden of illness in FM is substantial and comparable to RA. Patients with FM incurred direct costs approximately equal to RA patients. Patients with FM had more ED, physician, and physical therapy visits than RA patients. Patients in both groups had several comorbidities. Patients with FM+RA incurred direct costs almost double those of the patients with either diagnosis alone. FM and RA patients incurred similar overall absence and short-term disability costs.     

One-year costs of ischemic heart disease among patients with acute coronary syndromes: findings from a multi-employer claims database*

ABSTRACT

Objective: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are life-threatening disorders requiring intensive medical management or invasive cardiovascular procedures. Limited data exist on the costs and resource utilization associated with ACS.

Methods: This retrospective single-cohort study analyzed administrative claims data from employer-sponsored plans for patients with an ACS hospitalization in 2001–2002. A 1?year follow-up period was used, and patients who were under age 35 or had an ACS diagnosis in the 12 months before the hospitalization were excluded. Costs were reported in 2005 US dollars.

Results: We identified 16?321 patients hospitalized for ACS during the study period. Mean (±?SD) age was 55.6 (±?6.7) years, 66.7% were male, and 46.3% underwent a revascularization procedure during their initial hospital­ization. Mean length of stay for the initial hospitalization was 4.6 days (median: 3.0; IQR: 2.0–5.0), and per-patient expenditures averaged $22?921 (median: $13?960; IQR: $6839–28?588). During the follow-up period, 21% of patients were rehospitalized for ischemic heart disease (IHD), and the cost of rehospitalization averaged $28?637. Additionally, in the year following the inpatient admission, 50% of patients were prescribed antiplatelet or anti­coagulant medications, and 90% of patients were prescribed lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, or anti­arrhythmic medications. IHD-related expenditures after the initial inpatient stay averaged $9425 (median: $2800; IQR: $899–7577); 61% of these costs were due to rehospitalization. Total first-year costs averaged $32?345 (median: $21?653; IQR: $10?642–41?106).

Limitations: Diagnoses could not be verified through medical charts. Payments for Medicare patients were not assessed given our focus on the working-age population.

Conclusions: In this employer-sponsored health plan population, the costs of inpatient and outpatient IHD-related care were high. Future studies should evaluate the impact of improved patient management on post-discharge costs.     

Impact of comorbid depression or anxiety on patterns of treatment and economic outcomes among patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this retrospective analysis was to assess the correlation of comorbid depression and/or anxiety to patterns of treatment, healthcare utilization, and associated costs among diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) patients, employing a large US administrative claims database.

Research design and methods: Patients under age 65 with commercial insurance and patients aged 65 and older with employer-sponsored Medicare supplemental insurance were selected for the study if they had at least one diagnosis of DPNP in 2005. The first observed DPNP claim was considered the ‘index date.’ All individuals had a 12-month pre-index and 12-month follow-up period. For both populations, two subgroups were constructed for individuals with depression and/or anxiety (DPNP-DA cohort) or without these disorders (DPNP-only cohort). Patients’ demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and medication use were compared over the pre-index period. Healthcare expenditures and resource utilization were measured for the post-index period. Two-part models were used to examine the impact of comorbid depression and/or anxiety on healthcare utilization and costs, controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics.

Results: The study identified 11?854 DPNP-only and 1512 DPNP-DA patients in the Medicare supplemental cohort, and 11?685 and 2728 in the commercially insured cohort. Compared to DPNP-only patients over the follow-up period, a significantly higher percentage of DPNP-DA patients were dispensed pain and DPNP-related medication. All components of healthcare utilization, except home healthcare visits and physician office visits, were more likely to be provided to DPNP-DA patients versus the DPNP-only cohort (all p?<?0.01). Controlling for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, DPNP-DA patients had significantly higher total costs than those of DPNP-only patients for Medicare ($9134, p?<?0.01) and commercially insured patients ($11?085, p?<?0.01).

Limitations: Due to the use of a retrospective administrative claims database, limitations of this study include the potential for selection bias between study cohorts, mis-identification of DPNP and/or depression, and inability to assess indirect costs as well as use and cost of over-the-counter medications.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that the healthcare costs were significantly higher for DPNP patients comorbid with depression and/or anxiety relative to those without such disorders.     

Healthcare utilization and direct costs of non-infectious comorbidities in HIV-infected patients in the USA

Objective: To estimate the incremental healthcare utilization and costs associated with common non-infectious comorbid conditions among commercially and Medicaid-insured HIV-infected patients in the US.

Methods: US administrative claims were used to select adult HIV patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, or fracture/osteoporosis, three common comorbidities that have been associated with HIV and HIV treatment, between 1 January 2004 and 30 June 2013. Propensity score matched controls with no CKD, no CVD events, and no fracture/osteoporosis were identified for comparison. All-cause healthcare utilization and costs were reported as per patient per month (PPPM).

Results: The commercial cohort comprised 381 CKD patients, 624 patients with CVD events, and 774 fracture/osteoporosis patients, and 1013, 1710, and 2081 matched controls, respectively; while the Medicaid HIV cohort comprised 207 CKD and 271 CVD cases, and 516 and 735 matched controls, respectively. There was insufficient Medicaid data for fracture analyses. Across both payers, HIV patients with CKD or CVD events had significantly higher healthcare utilization and costs than controls. The average incremental PPPM costs in HIV patients with CKD were $1403 in the commercial cohort and $3051 in the Medicaid cohort. In those with CVD events, the incremental costs were $2655 (commercial) and $4959 (Medicaid) for HIV patients compared to controls (p?Conclusions: The results suggested a considerable increase in healthcare utilization and costs associated with CKD, CVD and fracture/osteoporosis comorbidities among HIV patients in the past decade. Because these conditions have been associated with treatment, it is critical to consider their impact on costs and outcomes when optimizing patient care.     

Warfarin time in therapeutic range and its impact on healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Background:

Warfarin is efficacious for reducing stroke risk among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, the efficacy and safety of warfarin are influenced by its time in therapeutic range (TTR).

Objective:

To assess differences in healthcare resource utilization and costs among NVAF patients with low (<60%) and high (≥60%) warfarin TTRs in an integrated delivery network (IDN) setting.

Methods:

Patients with NVAF were identified from an electronic medical record database. Patients were required to have ≥6 international normalized prothrombin time ratio (INR) tests. NVAF patients were grouped into two cohorts: those with warfarin TTR <60% (low TTR) and those with warfarin TTR ≥60% (high TTR). Healthcare resource utilization and costs were evaluated during a 12 month follow-up period. Multivariable regressions were used to assess the impact of different warfarin TTRs on healthcare costs.

Results:

Among the study population, greater than half (54%, n?=?1595) had a low TTR, and 46% (n?=?1356) had a high TTR. Total all-cause healthcare resource utilization was higher among patients in the low TTR cohort vs. the high TTR cohort (number of encounters: 70.2 vs. 56.1, p?<?0.001). After adjusting for patient characteristics, total all-cause healthcare costs and stroke-related healthcare costs were $2398 (p?<?0.001) and $687 (p?=?0.02) higher, respectively, for patients in the low TTR cohort vs. the high TTR cohort.

Limitations:

In this retrospective study, we were only able to evaluate the association and not the causality between healthcare resource utilization and costs with the different warfarin TTRs.

Conclusion:

Many warfarin-treated NVAF patients have a low warfarin TTR. NVAF patients with low vs. patients with high warfarin TTR used healthcare resources to a greater extent, which was reflected in higher healthcare costs.     

The costs of Crohn's disease in the United States and other Western countries: a systematic review

ABSTRACT

Objective: To conduct a critical and systematic literature review of the costs of Crohn's disease (CD) in Western industrialized countries.

Research design and methods: Studies published in English that described the cost of CD in Western industrialized countries were identified using three major databases (Medline, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science). Studies were reviewed and rated based on their relevance to cost of illness and the reliability of the estimates. All costs were adjusted for inflation to 2006 values.

Results: Estimated direct medical costs were $18 022–18 932 per patient with CD per year in the United States, and €2898–6960 in other Western countries. Hospital­izations accounted for 53–66% of direct medical costs, with an average cost-per-hospitalization of $37?459 in the United States. Estimated indirect costs accounted for 28% of the total cost in the United States and 64–69% in Europe. Costs differed greatly by disease severity. Costs of patients with severe disease were 3- to 9-fold higher than patients in remission. Direct medical costs in the United States for patients in the top 25% of total costs averaged $60?582 per year; costs of patients in the top 2% averaged more than $300?000 per year. Combining prevalence rates, the total economic burden of CD was $10.9–15.5 billion in the United States and €2.1–16.7 billion in Europe.

Limitations: This review is limited by the research quality and variations of the individual studies reviewed, and only includes English articles.

Conclusions: This updated literature synthesis demonstrated the substantial total cost burden of CD, of which hospital­izations accounted for more than half of direct medical costs.     

The effect of adjunctive mood stabilizers on antipsychotic utilization pattern and health resource utilization for Medicaid enrollees with schizophrenia

ABSTRACT

Background: Prescribing adjunctive mood stabilizers to manage schizophrenia is prevalent, despite the lack of substantial evidence to support the long-term use of this treatment regimen.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of using adjunctive mood stabilizers on antipsychotic utilization, total health expenditures, inpatient hospital­izations, long-term care stays, and emergency room (ER) visits for patients with schizophrenia.

Methods: Georgia Medicaid claims from 1999 through 2001 were analyzed to identify recipients diagnosed with schizophrenia (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD?9?CM]: 295.XX). The treatment groups consisted of subjects who received combination therapy of mood stabilizers and anti­psychotics (including both atypical and typical medica­tions), while the comparison group consisted of subjects who were on antipsychotic medications without exposure to the mood stabilizers under investigation. Four treatment groups (valproate, lithium, carbamazepine, and combina­tion mood stabilizer therapy) were formed based on the mood stabilizers patient received. Differences in annual health care use and expenditures were estimated between propensity score matched treatment and comparison groups controlling for comorbidity, prior utilization, demographic, and health provider specialty.

Results: During the 1?year observation period, subjects in treatment groups filled an average of 200-days supply of adjunctive mood stabilizers. These adjunctive mood stabilizer recipients had significantly longer antipsychotic treatment durations than the subjects who did not have exposure to mood stabilizers (valproate + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: 56.47 days, p < 0.0001; lithium + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: 90.25 days, p < 0.0001; carbamazepine + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: 41.27 days, p = 0.0439; multiple mood stabilizers + anti­psychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: 83.14 days, p < 0.0001). The intensive pharmacotherapy associated with treatment groups resulted in $900–$1300 higher pharmacy costs than the comparison groups (valproate + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: $1218.43, p < 0.0001; lithium + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: $985.79, p = 0.0015; carbamazepine + antipsychotic vs. anti­psychotic only, net difference: $911.63, p = 0.0497; multiple mood stabilizers + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: $1281.91, p < 0.0047). However, there were no statistically significant differences for total health expenditures, hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and nursing home admissions between propensity-matched treatment and control groups.

Conclusions: There were no differences in health care costs or utilization of ER, long-term care, and inpatient services between schizophrenia patients who did and did not receive adjunctive mood stabilizer; however, longer anti­psychotic treatment durations were observed in patients receiving adjunctive mood stabilizers. Interpretation of these results is limited by the unknown selection bias between the treatment and the comparison groups and the relatively small number of patients in some treatment groups. The development of a better-controlled study to further evaluate this treatment regimen is warranted.     

Evaluation of the association between health insurance status and healthcare utilization and expenditures among adult cancer survivors in the United States

BackgroundHealth care expenditures for cancer care has increased significantly over the past decade and is further projected to rise. This study examined the associations between health insurance status and total direct health care expenditures and health care utilization among cancer survivors living in the United States.MethodsA cross-sectional study of cancer survivors aged ≥18 years, identified from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (MEPS) during 2017 using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes specific for cancer. Health insurance was categorized into Private, Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured. Multivariable ordinary least squares regression was used to examine the association between log expenditures and health insurance. Negative binomial regression with log link was used to obtain adjusted incident rate ratios (AIRR) for health care utilization. Survey weights were used to produce nationally representative estimates of the US population.ResultsA total of 1140 (weighted = 13.9 million) cancer survivors were identified. Compared to the adjusted mean annual health care expenditures for the private group ($14,265; 95% confidence interval (CI): $12,645 to $16,092), the adjusted mean annual health care expenditures for the Medicare group were higher ($15,112; 95%CI: $13,361 to $17,092). As compared to the private group, the average annual expenditures for uninsured cancer survivors ($2315; 95%CI:1038 to $3501) was significantly lower and so was their health care utilization. Adjusted rates of ER visits for Medicaid were twice (AIRR:2.04; SE:0.28; p = 0.001) as compared to privately insured.ConclusionsA difference in the average total direct expenditures between uninsured and privately insured patients was found. Uninsured had the lowest health care utilization while Medicaid reported significantly higher number of ER visits. Despite differences in program structures, health care expenditures across insurance types were similar. Lower utilization of health care services among uninsured suggests cost maybe a barrier to accessing care.     

Real-world costs of ischemic stroke by discharge status

Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate the acute healthcare costs of ischemic stroke during hospitalization and the quarterly all-cause healthcare costs for the first year after discharge by discharge status.

Methods: Adult patients with a hospitalization with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke (ICD-9-CM: 434.xx or 436.xx) between 1 January 2006 and 31 March 2015 were identified from a large US commercial claims database. Patients were classified into three cohorts based on their discharge status from the first stroke hospitalization, i.e. dead at discharge, discharged with disability, or discharged without disability. Third-party (medical and pharmacy) and out-of-pocket costs were adjusted to 2015 USD.

Results: A total of 7919 patients dead at discharge, 45,695 patients discharged with disability, and 153,778 patients discharged without disability were included in this analysis. The overall average age was 59.7 years and 52.3% were male. During hospitalization, mean total costs (third-party and out-of-pocket) were $68,370 for patients dead at discharge, $73,903 for patients discharged with disability, and $24,448 for patients discharged without disability (p?p?p?p?Conclusion: The results demonstrated the high economic burden of ischemic stroke, especially among patients discharged with disability with the highest costs incurred during the inpatient stays.