Extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma. A clinicopathologic study of 31 cases

The rate and clinical features of patients admitted to King George V Hospital with extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma during a 9-year period were reviewed. In this time, 31 of 236 (13%) patients with an initial diagnosis of invasive serous ovarian carcinoma fulfilled the surgicopathologic criteria for this entity. All patients had disseminated tumor equivalent to ovarian Stage III and IV disease (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO]) and with predominantly high-grade neoplasms. They were managed by surgical exploration, tumor debulking where possible, and postoperative chemotherapy. A comparison with a contemporaneous series of 139 patients with primary epithelial ovarian carcinoma matched for stage and grade of disease and managed similarly showed no difference in actuarial survival. The median survival times were 11.3 months for patients with extraovarian serous papillary carcinomas and 13.5 months for patients with equivalent primary ovarian neoplasms. The features of the disease and the treatment regimens used are discussed.     

Serous borderline tumors of the ovary. A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and quantitative study of 44 cases.

The clinicopathologic features of 44 serous borderline tumors (SBT) of the ovary were evaluated. Nineteen were Stages II and III, and 9 had invasive peritoneal implants. All 19 patients received chemotherapy and 4, who had invasive implants, died of disease after 3, 4.3, 8, and 9 years. The other 25 patients were free of tumor 1-14 years (mean, 5.3 years) after surgery. Coexpression of low molecular weight keratins (AE1, CAM 5.2) and vimentin was found in all tumors and their implants. No significant differences were found between SBT with different volume-corrected mitotic indices (M/Vi) with respect to gross features, presence or absence of implants, stage, and survival. Cytometric DNA analysis also was performed on the primary ovarian tumors and the implants. Twenty-one primary tumors had diploid or tetraploid histograms, and 23 had aneuploid histograms. DNA ploidy of the primary ovarian tumors did not correlate with gross features, the presence or absence of implants, M/Vi, stage, and survival. The data from this study confirm that most SBT are clinically benign, but SBT with invasive implants may behave aggressively. Expression of intermediate filaments, M/Vi, and DNA ploidy evaluation of the primary ovarian tumors seem to be of no value in predicting prognosis. However, four of seven patients with aneuploid DNA implants died of tumor.     

Pathology of ovarian carcinoma

Serous carcinoma is the most common type of ovarian cancer and usually is associated with peritoneal metastases and poor survival except for meticulously staged patients with tumors confined to the ovaries. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas account for most nonserous carcinomas and more often present with low-stage disease; survival for the various cell types is similar when stratified by stage. Borderline ovarian tumors can be subdivided into benign and malignant neoplasms, and in the view of some experts, this renders the borderline category obsolete. Women with typical serous borderline tumors (atypical proliferative serous tumors) constitute most of these patients and have virtually 100% survival, unless invasive peritoneal implants are present. Micropapillary serous carcinomas (a less common variant, also called serous borderline tumor with a micropapillary pattern) and tumors with invasive implants behave similar to low-grade invasive carcinomas.     

Diagnosis,Treatment, and Follow‐Up of Borderline Ovarian Tumors

Borderline ovarian tumors represent a heterogeneous group of noninvasive tumors of uncertain malignant potential with characteristic histology. They occur in younger women, are present at an early stage, and have a favorable prognosis, but symptomatic recurrence and death may be found as long as 20 years after therapy in some patients. The molecular changes in borderline ovarian tumors indicate linkage of this disease to type I ovarian tumors (low-grade ovarian carcinomas). The pathological stage of disease and subclassification of extraovarian disease into invasive and noninvasive implants, together with the presence of postoperative macroscopic residual disease, appear to be the major predictor of recurrence and survival. However, it should be emphasized that the most important negative prognostic factor for recurrence is just the use of conservative surgery, but without any impact on patient survival because most recurrent diseases are of the borderline type—easily curable and with an excellent prognosis. Borderline tumors are difficult masses to correctly preoperatively diagnose using imaging methods because their macroscopic features may overlap with invasive and benign ovarian tumors. Over the past several decades, surgical therapy has shifted from a radical approach to more conservative treatment; however, oncologic safety must always be balanced. Follow-up is essential using routine ultrasound imaging, with special attention paid to the remaining ovary in conservatively treated patients. Current literature on this topic leads to a number of controversies that will be discussed thoroughly in this article, with the aim to provide recommendations for the clinical management of these patients.     

Serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential with peritoneal implants

Between 1956 and 1985, 82 patients with metastatic low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, subsequently reclassified by pathologic review as serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential with peritoneal implants, were seen at the authors' institution. Median age was 34 years (range, 17-64 years). Original stage distribution was as follows: 32 Stage II, 46 Stage III, and four Stage IV. Peritoneal implants in 72 patients were classified as benign (22 patients), noninvasive (37), or invasive (13). For ten patients, implants were clinically documented but histologic material was unavailable. The most common sites of peritoneal implants included the pelvic peritoneum (42), omentum (33), uterus (33), and fallopian tube (26). All patients underwent primary surgery. Postoperative therapy consisted of radiotherapy in 18 patients, single-agent chemotherapy in 37 patients, combination chemotherapy in 25 patients, and no therapy in two patients. Second-look laparotomy documented response to chemotherapy in 42% of patients with no gross residual disease and in 80% of patients with macroscopic residual disease (40% complete response, 40% partial response). Disease-free survival rates were 95% at 5 years and 91% at 10 years. The International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage, extent of residual disease, type of postoperative treatment, and type of peritoneal implants had no effect on survival. Based on a comparison of the present study's findings with those in the literature, the authors propose possible explanations for differences in survival by type of peritoneal implants and outline recommendations for clinical management until further studies elucidate the role of postoperative therapy.     

Behavior of borderline tumors with particular interest to persistence, recurrence, and progression to invasive carcinoma: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Borderline tumors account for 10% to 20% of epithelial ovarian tumors, and their prognosis is outstanding; nevertheless, a mortality of up to 20% has been reported, particularly in earlier reports. There is a lack of information about the actual mortality and the rate of progression into invasive carcinoma in large and prospectively accrued populations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All women with borderline ovarian tumors undergoing primary surgery in our department or referred within 3 months from surgery performed elsewhere from 1982 to 1997 were prospectively accrued and observed. RESULTS: We studied 339 women (83.4% stage I, 7.9% stage II, and 8.5% stage III). The median age at diagnosis was 39 years. A total of 150 women underwent radical surgery, and 189 underwent fertility-sparing surgery. After surgery, 13 women had macroscopic residual disease. With a median follow-up of 70 months, 317 women are alive with no clinical disease (eight with documented subclinical persistence of implants), three are alive with clinical disease, two died of disease, 10 died of other reasons, and seven women have been lost to follow-up. The recurrence of disease was higher after fertility-sparing surgery (35 of 189 cases) than after radical surgery (seven of 150 cases); nevertheless, all but one woman with recurrence of borderline tumor or progression to carcinoma after conservative surgery were salvaged. We observed seven progressions (2.0%) into invasive carcinoma, five in serous tumors (2.4%), and two in mucinous tumors (1.6%). The disease-free survival is 99.6% in stage I patients, 95.8% in stage II, and 89% in stage III. CONCLUSION: The survival of patients with borderline tumors is higher than previously described in some retrospective studies. Conservative surgery is safe and may be proposed to several patients with early and disseminated disease after thorough discussion of all therapeutic options. Progression to carcinoma is approximately 2% and may be observed in both mucinous and serous tumors.     

Unifocal origin of advanced human epithelial ovarian cancers.

Ovarian cancers are often diagnosed at a late stage, after the cancer cells have spread to extraovarian sites. Failure to diagnose these tumors earlier may reflect the lack of symptoms and the need for a sensitive, reliable screening test. Alternatively, this can be explained by the hypothesis that some of the extraovarian tumor implants do not represent metastatic spread from the primary cancer but instead are multiple primary tumors developing simultaneously in the peritoneal epithelium. If this is the case, some patients with advanced ovarian cancer may never have had a stage I disease, making early detection theoretically impossible. In this study, we examined the mutational pattern of the p53 gene in 9 patients with epithelial ovarian cancers using tissue collected from different sites within the same patient. In all 9 cases, the mutational pattern of the p53 gene was identical in cancer cells from different sites within the same patient, strongly suggesting that these ovarian tumors were of unifocal origin and that cancer tissues collected from different sites are derived from a single origin.     

Survival among women with borderline ovarian tumors and ovarian carcinoma: a population-based analysis

BACKGROUND: Serous and mucinous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (LMP-S and LMP-M, respectively) are noninvasive tumors that portend excellent survival when confined to the ovary. Comparison of the survival for women with LMP tumors staged as distant with women who have carcinoma may have important implications for diagnostic terminology and clinical management. METHODS: The authors compared relative survival rates among patients diagnosed with ovarian tumors during the period 1988-1999 (with follow-up through 2000) by histologic type, disease stage, tumor grade (for carcinomas), and patient age, using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. RESULTS: The overall relative survival rate at 10 years (+/- 1.96 standard errors) was 96.9% +/- 2.3% for women with LMP-S tumors, 30.4% +/- 1.7% for women with serous carcinoma (CA-S); 94.0% +/- 3.1% for women with LMP-M tumors, and 64.7% +/- 3.4% for women with mucinous carcinoma (CA-M). The survival rate at 10 years for women with distant-stage LMP-S tumors was 89.9% +/- 5.3%, compared with 96.1% +/- 8.6% for women with well differentiated, localized CA-S. The survival rate for women with distant-stage LMP-M tumors at 5 years was 85.5% +/- 9.0%, compared with 95.5% +/- 3.4% for women with well differentiated, localized CA-M (data for 10 years were limited). Mucinous ovarian neoplasms were associated with an excess of second malignancies of the digestive tract. CONCLUSIONS: Relative survival among women with distant-stage LMP tumors was not 100% and resembled the survival of women who had carcinoma exhibiting favorable prognostic features (localized stage). Future studies of women with high-stage LMP tumors are required to clarify the pathogenesis of extraovarian lesions and their implications for management and prognosis.     

Peritoneal washing cytologic analysis of ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential to detect peritoneal implants and predict clinical outcome

BACKGROUND:

Patients with ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (OSLMP) who have peritoneal implants, especially invasive implants, are at an increased risk of developing tumor recurrence. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the ability of peritoneal washing (PW) cytology to detect the presence and type of peritoneal implants has not been adequately investigated, and its prognostic significance is unknown.

METHODS:

Records and PW specimens of 101 patients diagnosed with and treated for OSLMP between 1996 and 2010 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' staging biopsy findings were compared with the results of the authors' review of the PWs. Follow‐up data were also analyzed.

RESULTS:

Of the 96 patients for whom staging biopsy results were available, 26 (27%) had peritoneal implants (17 noninvasive and 9 invasive), 19 (20%) had endosalpingiosis, and 51 (53%) had negative findings. The PW specimens of 18 of the 26 patients (69%) with peritoneal implants were positive for serous neoplasm, and a correlation was found between cytologic and histologic findings (P < .0001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 69%, 84%, 62%, and 88%, respectively. Four of 101 patients had disease recurrence; 3 of these patients had invasive implants and 1 patient had noninvasive implants. None of the patients who had negative staging biopsy findings or endosalpingiosis but did have PW specimens that were positive for serous neoplasm developed disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS:

PW cytology detects the presence of peritoneal implants with moderate accuracy. However, long‐term studies are needed to determine whether positive PW cytologic findings are an independent predictor of tumor recurrence. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2012;. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Cigarette smoking and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer

Background An increased risk of mucinous ovarian tumors among cigarette smokers has been observed in multiple studies. The association of smoking with other histologic types of ovarian cancer is less clear, but potentially holds greater importance for prevention of disease incidence and mortality. Methods In a population-based study of 812 women with ovarian cancer diagnosed in western Washington State from 2002–2005 and 1,313 controls, we assessed the risk associated with cigarette smoking, with a particular focus on tumor subgroups jointly classified according to the degree of invasiveness and histology. Information was collected through in-person interviews, and logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The incidence of both borderline and invasive mucinous ovarian tumors was increased among women with a history of cigarette smoking (ORs and 95% CIs = 1.8, 1.2–2.9, and 1.8, 0.8–4.3, respectively). Increases in risk of these tumor types were most evident among women with greater smoking duration and pack-years of exposure, and among those who had smoked within the prior 15 years. We noted no clear patterns of risk of serous tumors with duration or pack-years of smoking; however, risk of these tumor types was somewhat elevated among women who had smoked within the previous 15 years (for borderline serous tumors, OR and 95% CI = 1.5, 0.9–2.3; for invasive serous tumors, OR and 95% CI = 1.4, 1.1–1.9). The risk of endometrioid, clear cell, and the remaining histologic types of invasive ovarian cancer was not increased among smokers. Conclusion In the aggregate, evidence is insufficient to determine whether smoking is linked with risk of serous or other non-mucinous histologic types of ovarian cancer. Studies that employ additional histopathologic and molecular techniques to more accurately delineate subsets of tumors may improve our understanding of the impact of smoking on ovarian cancer risk.     

Adenocarcinoma papilar seroso primario del peritoneo

A clinical case of primary peritoneal serous adenocarcinoma is presented. A woman 66 years old with abdominal pain and ascitis. Clinical, radiologic and cytology data suggested a peritoneal carcinomatosis of an unknown primary adenocarcinoma. Laparotomy and definitive histopathological findings show a müllerian primary peritoneal serous adenocarcinoma with normal ovarian stromal tissue. A similitude with stage III ovarian adenocarcinoma has led to the Gynecologic Oncology group to make a criteria for these neoplasia: normal ovarian size; non ovarian stromal tissue affectation; more extraovarian disease; histopathology of a papillary serous carcinoma. Nevertheless the correct treatment for these type of tumor is the same as that of the ovarian adenocarcinoma.     

Peritoneal implants of ovarian serous borderline tumors. Histologic features and prognosis

The clinicopathologic features of 56 cases of ovarian serous borderline tumors (SBT) associated with peritoneal implants were reviewed. Data from 368 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up, 6.0 years) were analyzed to investigate the possibility that the histologic features of implants of this type of tumor may correlate with the prognosis. Eighty-five percent of the 56 patients were clinically free of tumor at the time of death or at last contact. Thirteen percent of the patients died of tumor, and one patient (2%) was alive with widespread progressive tumor. The product-limit estimate of the probability of death from tumor (+/- standard error) was 4% (+/- 3%) at 5 years and 23% (+/- 9%) at 10 years. The following three histologic features of the implants correlated with an adverse prognosis: (1) invasion (P = 0.0004), (2) severe cytologic atypia in both invasive and noninvasive implants (P = 0.0008) and in noninvasive implants alone (P = 0.02), and (3) the presence of mitotic activity in both types of implants (P = 0.02) and in noninvasive implants alone (P = 0.02). The only other feature that correlated with the prognosis was the presence of residual tumor postoperatively as assessed by the surgeon (P = 0.01). The product-limit estimate of death of tumor in patients with at least one of these four adverse prognostic factors was 56% (+/- 20%) at 10 years. Whether or not the patients received radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or both had no statistically significant effect on the outcome. These data and the results of a stratified analysis suggest that patients may benefit from additional therapy if adverse prognostic factors are present, especially invasiveness or severe cytologic atypia. It is unlikely that additional therapy is necessary in patients without adverse prognostic features, because no deaths occurred in this group.     

Biology of epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for screening women at high genetic risk.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to analyze the clinicopathologic features of screen-detected ovarian cancers identified in women, either at general population risk or high genetic risk of ovarian cancer, who have participated in screening studies. METHODS: Studies published between 1988 and April 2003 were categorized by the population screened and the primary screening modalities used. Each report was examined with reference to the histologic type, stage, and grade of screen-detected cancers. Reports of studies of prophylactically removed ovaries from women at high risk of ovarian cancer were also reviewed. RESULTS: Of the stage I tumors detected by screening women at population risk, almost half were borderline ovarian tumors, granulosa-cell tumors, or germ-cell tumors, which is disproportionate to their frequency. Furthermore, of the stage I invasive epithelial cancers diagnosed in women at population risk, the majority were endometrioid, clear-cell, and mucinous histologic subtypes. Most ovarian cancers that occur in women at high genetic risk are high-grade serous cancers, and these are infrequently screen detected at an early stage. CONCLUSION: The clinicopathologic features of screen-detected ovarian cancers suggest that screening may not reduce mortality in women at increased genetic risk. Prospective screening studies are required in genetically high-risk populations to answer this important question. Women electing surveillance should be aware of the lack of proven benefit and the low likelihood of detecting early stage serous cancers. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy appears to be the most effective approach to decrease the risk of ovarian cancer and thereby reduce mortality in high-risk women.     

Outcomes after conservative treatment of advanced-stage serous borderline tumors of the ovary

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of the largest series of patients treated conservatively for a stage II or III serous borderline ovarian tumor.Materials and methodsFrom 1969 to 2006, 41 patients were treated conservatively for an advanced-stage serous borderline ovarian tumor. Patient outcomes were reviewed.ResultsTwenty patients had undergone a unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, 18 a unilateral cystectomy and two bilateral cystectomy (unknown for one patient). Three patients had invasive implants. The median duration of follow-up was 57 months (range 4–235). The recurrence rate was high (56%), but overall survival remained excellent (100% at 5 years, 92% at 10 years). One death had occurred due to an invasive ovarian recurrence. Eighteen pregnancies (nine spontaneous) were observed in 14 patients.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that spontaneous pregnancies can be achieved after conservative treatment of advanced-stage borderline ovarian tumors (with noninvasive implants) but the recurrence rate is high. Nevertheless, this high rate has no impact on survival. Conservative surgery can be proposed to patients with a borderline tumor of the ovary and noninvasive peritoneal implants. Should infertility persist following treatment of the borderline tumor, an in vitro fertilization procedure can be cautiously proposed.     

Borderline ovarian tumors

Borderline ovarian tumors account for approximately 15% of all epithelial ovarian tumors. In the early 1970s, borderline tumors were categorized as either serous or mucinous with overall survival rates of 75–90%. Since then, it has been recognized that the two categories are heterogonous. There are now many different groups following the recognition of serous tumors with microinvasion, non‐invasive and invasive peritoneal implants and a micropapillary pattern, and of mucinous tumors with microinvasion, intraepithelial carcinoma and pseudomyxoma peritoneal implants, in addition to further delineation of endometrial, clear cell and transitional cell tumors with atypical proliferation. This review outlines the most recent information regarding the epidemiology, pathology and clinical management of borderline tumors. Surgical management to excise all visible tumors remains the cornerstone of therapy. Because borderline ovarian tumors often occur in reproductive‐age women, fertility is an important issue. Conservative surgery is a safe in carefully selected patients. Effective non‐surgical therapies are yet to be identified.     

Significance of histologic grading in the prognosis of ovarian tumors

The prognostic significance of a histologic grading system was studied by an analysis of pathological specimens from 73 patients with ovarian epithelial cancers and tumors of borderline malignancies (tumors of low malignant potential) collected over a period of 25 years. The survival probability of patients in each group was analyzed by a computer program based on the product limit of Kaplan and Meier. The histologic grading scheme based on the presence of papillary formations or glands versus the presence of solid tumor nests proved to be prognostically significant for patients with stage I and II disease. The other grading system, based on cytologic features, was able to stratify survival rates into three instead of two groups distinguished by the histologic grading system. The survival of patients with moderately and poorly differentiated tumors was essentially the same. No difference was found between the prognoses of patients with cytologic grades 3 and 4.     

Ovarian epithelial tumors of borderline malignancy. A clinical and pathologic study of 109 cases

One hundred nine cases of ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors) diagnosed at Stanford University Medical Center from 1958 to 1982 were reviewed. The patients ranged in age from 10 to 79 years (mean, 40.5 years). The histologic types and corresponding stages of these neoplasms were 73 serous (Stage IA: 35 patients; Stage IB+C: 16 patients; stage II: 8 patients; Stage III: 14 patients), 30 mucinous (Stage IA: 27 patients; Stage IB+C: 3 patients), and 6 mixed seromucinous (all Stage IA). Borderline endometrioid, clear cell, and Brenner tumors were excluded. Follow-up information from 3 to 27 years from the time of initial diagnosis (mean, 7.6 years; median, 7.1 years) revealed that 89 patients are alive without further evidence of neoplasm, and three patients died of unrelated disease without recurrent tumor. Seventeen patients have developed persistent or recurrent neoplasms in the contralateral ovary (six patients) and/or elsewhere within the peritoneal cavity (15 patients) at 5 to 226 months (mean, 61 months) after the initial excision. All of the second neoplasms were borderline serous or seromucinous tumors histologically identical to the original tumor; none of the borderline mucinous tumors recurred. Patients who initially had Stage III borderline serous tumors developed persistent or recurrent neoplasms more commonly (64%) than did patients with lower stage tumors (12%). No correlation was found between the development of a subsequent serous neoplasm and patient age, the primary tumor size, or any single histologic feature. Following treatment of the subsequent neoplasms, 13 patients are free of neoplasm, one patient is alive with tumor, one patient has died of intercurrent disease with tumor, and two patients have died with widespread abdominal tumor 53 and 232 months after their initial diagnosis. These findings confirm the excellent prognosis for patients with borderline serous tumors, despite involvement of the peritoneal cavity and the development of recrudescent tumor, although long-term follow-up is indicated. Mucinous borderline tumors, as defined by published criteria, almost invariably present as localized (low-stage) tumors and, in our experience, do not recur when confined to the ovary.     

Transitional cell carcinoma in high-grade high-stage ovarian carcinoma. An indicator of favorable response to chemotherapy

We reviewed 53 high-grade carcinomas of the ovary in order to define pathologic features that correlate with prognosis. All tumors were Stage III with comparable amounts of residual tumor left after the primary resection. Similar postoperative chemotherapeutic regimens were given to each patient, and there was a clinical followup of at least four years in each case. The tumors were classified according to their predominant (greater than 50%) histology as transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) (18 tumors), papillary serous (18), undifferentiated (8), or endometrioid (3). There were six mixed carcinomas without predominant histology. In 17 of 18 patients, TCC predominant tumors responded completely to chemotherapy and 15 of 18 patients (83%) are alive without disease 4 to 10 years after presentation (average 6.8 years). In comparison, tumor progression/recurrence developed in 31 of 35 non-TCC tumors (18 serous, eight undifferentiated, one endometrioid predominant, and four mixed carcinomas). Of these 35 patients, 27 (77%) died of disease from 6 months to 7 years after presentation (average 2.5 yrs.). Flow cytometric determination of DNA content and immunoperoxidase studies did not allow discrimination between the histologic types of high-grade ovarian carcinomas. We conclude that TCC should be recognized as a distinct histologic type of ovarian carcinoma because of the favorable response to chemotherapy and improved patient survival.     

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: Is there a role of histology-specific treatment?

Several clinical trials to establish standard treatment modality for ovarian cancers included a high abundance of patients with serous histologic tumors, which were quite sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy. On the other hand, ovarian tumor with rare histologic subtypes such as clear cell or mucinous tumors have been recognized to show chemo-resistant phenotype, leading to poorer prognosis. Especially, clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCC) is a distinctive tumor, deriving from endometriosis or clear cell adenofibroma, and response rate to platinum-based therapy is extremely low. It was implied that complete surgical staging enabled us to distinguish a high risk group of recurrence in CCC patients whose disease was confined to the ovary (pT1M0); however, complete surgical staging procedures could not lead to improved survival. Moreover, the status of peritoneal cytology was recognized as an independent prognostic factor in early-staged CCC patients, even after complete surgical staging. In advanced cases with CCC, the patients with no residual tumor had significantly better survival than those with the tumor less than 1 cm or those with tumor diameter more than 1 cm. Therefore, the importance of achieving no macroscopic residual disease at primary surgery is so important compared with other histologic subtypes. On the other hand, many studies have shown that conventional platinum-based chemotherapy regimens yielded a poorer prognosis in patients with CCC than in patients with serous subtypes. The response rate by paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) was slightly higher, ranging from 22% to 56%, which was not satisfactory enough. Another regimen for CCC tumors is now being explored: irinotecan plus cisplatin, and molecular targeting agents. In this review article, we discuss the surgical issues for early-staged and advanced CCC including possibility of fertility-sparing surgery, and the chemotherapy for CCC disease.     

Molecular Characterization of 103 Ovarian Serous and Mucinous Tumors

The pathogenesis of ovarian carcinomas is heterogeneous, with even the same entities showing great variance. In our study we investigated the mutations of the BRAF, KRAS, and p53 genes in serous and mucinous borderline tumors and in low grade and high grade serous and mucinous tumors. The mutations of BRAF and KRAS genes have been shown in 60% of borderline and low grade (well differentiated) serous and mucinous tumors, but very rarely in high grade (moderately and poorly differentiated) carcinomas. However mutations of p53 are very common in high grade tumors and this indicates a "dualistic" model of ovarian tumorigenesis. A total of 80 serous tumors, including serous borderline, low grade and high grade tumors, and 23 mucinous tumors, including borderline and invasive tumors were analysed for BRAF and KRAS mutations using real time PCR method followed by melting point analysis. P53 mutation was investigated by immunohistochemistry. We assumed mutation of the p53 gene when 100% of tumor cells showed strong nuclear positivity. We observed differences in genetic alterations in the development of the low grade tumors and between low and high grade tumors too. In some bilateral or stage II-III cases we observed differences between the mutation status of the left and right ovarian tumors and between the primary tumor and its implants. In one case in a tumor with micropapillary pattern showing high grade nuclear atypia we could detect mutations in both KRAS and p53 genes. The majority of our mucinous ovarian tumor cases showed a KRAS mutation. We have not found mutations of the BRAF and p53 genes in these cases. We have found as have others, that there is a dualistic pathway of ovarian carcinogenesis. In the majority of cases, low grade epithelial tumors develop in a stepwise manner due to genetic alterations of the members of MAP-kinase pathway; however mutation of the p53 gene is the key event in the development of high grade tumors.