Hormonal aspects of endometrial cancer

In summary, endometrial cancer is an estrogen-related neoplasm whose precursor lesion, endometrial hyperplasia, may be successfully treated with progestational agents. Trials of adjunctive progestin therapy have failed to demonstrate benefit, even though the malignancy is sensitive to palliative therapy with progestins as well as tamoxifen. Paradoxically, chronic tamoxifen exposure in postmenopausal women may increase the risk of endometrial cancer, and such women must be followed closely. Progesterone receptor may be measured using competitive binding assays or by immunohistochemical techniques. There is tumor heterogeneity with regard to progesterone receptor. Tissues surrounding the cancer may contain progesterone receptor and produce false-positive results in biochemical assays. Last, the presence of progesterone receptor not only predicts responsiveness to progestational therapy, but also confers a survival advantage in patients with endometrial cancer.     

Development of metastatic endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma while on progestin therapy for endometrial hyperplasia

BACKGROUND: Conservative treatment with progestins is a reasonable treatment option for endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia and, in the experimental setting, for some women with grade 1 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The risk of progression to a high-stage endometrial cancer is quite low, with only two previously reported cases in the English literature. CASE: A 40-year-old woman with endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia diagnosed by dilatation and curettage was managed conservatively with progestin therapy (initially, megesterol acetate; then, a combination oral contraceptive). More than 2 years after her original diagnosis, she developed endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma, FIGO grade 2, with lymph node metastasis. The tumor was microsatellite instability-high due to methylation of MLH1 and loss of MLH1 protein. CONCLUSION: Currently, there are no good criteria for predicting which patients with complex atypical hyperplasia/grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma will optimally respond to progestin therapy. There is some evidence that endometrial complex hyperplasia demonstrating loss of MLH1 protein by immunohistochemistry is strongly related to subsequent or concurrent endometrial cancer, especially tumors of higher grade and stage. In a woman with a biopsy diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, evaluation of MLH1 protein status by immunohistochemistry may provide useful information when medical management is being considered.     

Treatment of non-atypic endometrial hyperplasia using thermal balloon endometrial ablation therapy

BACKGROUND/AIM: Traditionally endometrial hyperplasias have been treated with progestins. Unfortunately, quite often hyperplasias are resistant to treatment, or they recur after therapy. The aim of the study was to compare traditional progestin administration with thermal balloon endometrial ablation in the treatment of non-atypic endometrial hyperplasia. METHODS: Women with endometrial hyperplasia (n = 34) were randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio. Endometrial biopsy samples were taken 6 and 12 months after the treatment; if any signs of hyperplasia were detected, hysterectomy was performed. In addition, the hospital records were checked in September 2003 to observe for any later hysterectomy. Main outcome measures were recovery from hyperplasia and avoidance of hysterectomy. RESULTS: In patients treated with thermal ablation, the hyperplasias persisted at 6 or 12 months in 4 out of 17 patients, whereas the rate was 6 out of 17 patients in the progestin therapy group. According to patient records, 1 further patient treated with thermal ablation and 3 further patients treated with progestin were hysterectomized after the last visit. A total of 14 of the 34 patients (41%) have been hysterectomized so far. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that thermal balloon endometrial ablation therapy seems to be as effective as traditional progestin administration in the treatment of non-atypic endometrial hyperplasia. The hysterectomy rate during the follow-up period was, however, considerably high, and, therefore, hysterectomy might be considered even a first-choice treatment for endometrial hyperplasias.     

The combined GnRH-agonist and intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing system treatment of complicated atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer: a pilot study

In this article, we present the results of organ-preserving treatment applied in 24 patients of reproductive age with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or early-stage endometrial cancer. All of them would like to preserve their reproductive potential. Thirteen women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia were treated with the combination of six intramuscular injections of 3.75?mg gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) ? leuproreline acetate depot every 4 weeks. After the third injection of 3.75?mg of leuproreline acetate, the levonorgestrel intrauterine hormonal system containing 52?mg levonorgestrel (Mirena^®, Bayer, Germany) was inserted for at least 6 months. In 11 women with stage IA well-differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma, hormonal therapy included nine intramuscular injections of 3.75?mg of GnRHa every 4 weeks. After the third injection of 3.75?mg of GnRHa, we also inserted a GnRH-IUS (Mirena^®) for at least 12 months. This type of therapy was effective for all these patients and may be offered to be used as an alternative to surgery in women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or early stage 1A well-differentiated endometrial cancer in women of reproductive age. Three women with endometrial cancer became pregnant and two of them delivered at term and one has an ongoing pregnancy.     

Mechanisms involved in the evolution of progestin resistance in human endometrial hyperplasia--precursor of endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND: Successful treatment of endometrial hyperplasia with progestins is commonly accompanied by the finding of an inactive or suppressed endometrium after therapy. However, approximately 30% of the endometrial hyperplasia cases do not respond to progestins and hyperplastic glands persist. The Fas/FasL system is known to play a role in tissue remodeling as a result of changes in menstrual hormone levels. The aims of this study are to examine Fas/FasL expression in endometrial hyperplasia of pre- and postprogestin treatment samples and to study the Fas/FasL regulation in vitro with Ishikawa cells after progestin stimulation. DESIGN: Pre- and posttreatment paraffin-embedded endometrial hyperplasia tissue samples from 26 women were examined by immunohistochemistry for changes in Fas/FasL expression related to the administration of progestins. Among 26 patients, 18 were successfully treated with progestins and 8 failed treatment. Fas/ FasL positivity was defined by the presence of 10% or more immunoreactive epithelial cells in each specimen. In positive cases, a percentage or an immunoscore of immunoreactive cells was given by counting 500 cells. Cell viability was evaluated by the MTT assay. The in vitro effects of progesterone on Fas/FasL expression and apoptosis in Ishikawa cells were examined by using Western blot and TUNEL assays, respectively. RESULTS: Fas immunoreactivity was present in 4/26 (15%) preprogestin cases with an average of 16% of the epithelial cells expressing Fas. FasL was expressed in 21/26 (80%) pretreatment cases with an average of 42% of the hyperplastic glandular cells being positive. In postprogestin cases, an increase of Fas expression (14/18, 77%) with an average of 47% stained cells was seen in responders (P < 0.001), while FasL was found in 16/18 (89%) responders with an average of 65% of cells positive (P = 0.587). In nonresponders, no significant changes in Fas/FasL expression were detected compared to pretreatment samples. With in vitro Ishikawa cells, a slight increase (10-20%) of Fas and FasL protein expression was detected after 24 h of progesterone treatment, but a more significant increase (220-343%) of both Fas and FasL expression was found after 48 h of withdrawing progesterone, which parallels apoptotic activity. CONCLUSIONS: The Fas/FasL system may be involved in the development of endometrial hyperplasia. Part of the molecular mechanisms of progestin therapy for endometrial hyperplasia is through upregulation of Fas/FasL expression. Dysregulation of Fas/FasL expression in hyperplastic endometrium may be part of the molecular mechanisms for nonresponders to progestin treatment. Intermittent, rather than continuous, progestin treatment may be more effective clinically for the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia.     

Uterine Blutungen bei internistischen Grunderkrankungen

Clinical management of unscheduled uterine bleeds in women using hormone replacement therapy (HRT) involves reconsideration of the selected individual therapy. Special attention should be given to the dose of the estrogen and progestin, the adequacy of both the progestin phase and the regimen – sequential or continuous combined therapy. A progestin should be administered for at least 10 days. It is unknown whether tibolone is an alternative for women with irregular bleeding on continuous combined therapy. These considerations also apply to women with uterine myoma. Transvaginal sonography may help identify women with thickened endometrium demanding histopathological assessment. Various controlled clinical trials suggest different cut-off values for a “normal” endometrial thickness (double-layer). A threshold of 7 mm appears to offer a reasonable compromise between sensitivity and specificity. A single episode of bleeding in the presence of an endometrial thickness ≤ 4 mm may allow for follow-up without endometrial sampling. Adherence to HRT may be enhanced by selecting the lowest doses of estrogens and progestins, including progesterone, achieving alleviation of climacteric symptoms without compromising endometrial safety. Parenteral use of estrogens and progestins is preferable in women with impaired liver function, as this mode of administration avoids the first-pass effect. This relatively small group of women may be eligible for replacement therapy if hepatic function reaches an equilibrium prior to initiation of therapy. Scarce clinical data indicate that systemic lupus erythematosus appears to deteriorate in women using HRT. However, other studies suggest that biliary cirrhosis does not deteriorate in women on HRT. HRT is possible in women with chronic renal and bone diseases. The outlined management of uterine bleeding also applies to these women. Uterine bleeding may occur with use of tamoxifen and less frequently with raloxifene, which is approved for the prophylaxis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Transvaginal sonography may identify women with uterine stimulation, as indicated by the presence of subendometrial cysts and thickened endometrium, and preselect patients for endometrial sampling to exclude hyperplasia and cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of a single measurement of endometrial thickness is limited and additional tests such as saline infusion sonography may enhance the predictive value of the ultrasound assessment. The baseline frequency of postmenopausal bleeding does not appear to be increased in women who use raloxifene. Preliminary data suggest that use of raloxifene is not associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer as is tamoxifen. SERMs constitute a relative contraindication in women with severe impairment of liver function.     

Apoptosis may be an early event of progestin therapy for endometrial hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of apoptosis during progestin therapy for the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia. METHODS: Pre- and posttreatment paraffin-embedded endometrial tissue samples from 19 women with endometrial hyperplasia were examined for changes in glandular cellularity and apoptotic activity related to the administration of progestins. Twelve patients were successfully treated with progestin therapy and 7 patients failed treatment. Glandular cellularity was assessed based on calculating the average number of cells per gland obtained on histologic examination of hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue sections. Apoptotic activity was assessed on the same tissue sections by counting the average number of apoptotic cells per 10 high power fields (hpf) using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. The effects of progesterone on apoptotic activity in a low-grade endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line (Ishikawa cells) was also examined using an ELISA cell death detection kit. RESULTS: Glandular cellularity significantly decreased with progestin therapy in both treatment outcome groups. The reduction in cells per gland was significantly greater in the group of successfully treated cases compared to the treatment failures (P = 0.005). However, within the successfully treated group, in situ detection of apoptotic cells using the TUNEL assay showed no statistical difference between pre- and posttreatment endometrial samples. Interestingly, a significant decrease in apoptosis was found in posttreatment samples of the group with persistent hyperplasia. The average number of apoptotic cells detected in 10 hpf was reduced from 7.9 prior to treatment to 3.1 after progestin therapy (P = 0.03). In the progesterone-treated Ishikawa cell line, an increase in apoptotic activity started at 24 h, reached a peak at 48 h, and continued up to 72 h of hormone treatment. At 48 h, apoptotic activity was 42.6% greater than in the untreated control (P = 0.04). By 72 h of progesterone treatment, apoptosis was 37.2% greater in the treated cells compared to the noninoculated cells (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Progestin-induced apoptosis may occur during the early period of treatment for endometrial hyperplasia. Compared to the fully responsive group, persistent endometrial hyperplasia may have intrinsically different molecular mechanisms in response to progestin therapy.     

Progesterone and endometrial cancer

It is well established that unopposed estrogen, either endogenous or therapeutic, can induce endometrial hyperplasia and potentially endometrial cancer (EC). Anovulatory cycles, obesity, and insulin resistance are major risk factors for EC. Progestogen (progesterone and progestin), including levonorgestrel intrauterine device, are able to prevent or to treat hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and even well-differentiated EC, as presented in this review. During menopausal hormone therapy, progestogens protect the endometrium against the proliferative effects of estrogens in women with a uterus. Whereas, recent epidemiologic data suggest that micronized progesterone (MP) is apparently safer for the breast, it could be less efficient than synthetic progestin on the endometrium. However, several studies from biopsies during treatment with MP do not show any increased risk of hyperplasia. Lack of compliance could explain the results on EC.     

Endometrial hyperplasia: a review

Endometrial hyperplasia is a precursor to the most common gynecologic cancer diagnosed in women: endometrial cancer of endometrioid histology. It is most often diagnosed in postmenopausal women, but women at any age with unopposed estrogen from any source are at an increased risk for developing endometrial hyperplasia. Hyperplasia with cytologic atypia represents the greatest risk for progression to endometrial carcinoma and the presence of concomitant carcinoma in women with endometrial hyperplasia. Abnormal uterine bleeding is the most common presenting symptom of endometrial hyperplasia. Specific Pap smear findings and endometrial thickness per ultrasound could also suggest the diagnosis. Unopposed estrogen in women taking hormone replacement therapy increases the risk of endometrial hyperplasia. Tamoxifen has demonstrated its efficacy in treating women at risk for breast cancer, but it increases the risk of endometrial hyperplasia. The choice of treatment for endometrial hyperplasia is dependent on patient age, the presence of cytologic atypia, the desire for future childbearing, and surgical risk. Endometrial hyperplasia without atypia responds well to progestins. However, women with atypical hyperplasia should be treated with hysterectomy unless other factors preclude surgery. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader should be able to describe the definition and classification of endometrial hyperplasia, to outline the clinical features of a patient with endometrial hyperplasia, to point out the natural history of endometrial hyperplasia, and to summarize the diagnostic options for patients with endometrial hyperplasia.     

Review of the endometrial effects of estrogens and progestins.

Several controversial areas have been reviewed. It would seem from the evidence at hand that progression from endometrial hyperplasia to endometrial carcinoma does occur in a significant percentage of women and that endometrial hyperplasia, particularly adenomatous hyperplasia and atypical hyperplasia, must be regarded as premalignant changes. Gambrell believes that all stages of hyperplasia should be regarded as premalignant. Previous and retrospective studies provide evidence implicating estrogens in the causation of both endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma. Although some of these studies may have design flaws, the amount of data is substantial. Prospective studies have demonstrated an increased risk of hyperplasia in women treated with estrogens. An increased risk of endometrial carcinoma in estrogen users compared with nonusers has been suggested even more recently. Reviewed as a whole, the cumulative evidence provided by these studies clearly supports this association, and it would appear the only issue left to resolve may be the magnitude of the association. Cyclic administration of estrogens may decrease the risk of development of endometrial carcinoma. It would seem, however, that such administration does not totally eliminate risk under any circumstances, and in fact, a dose-related relationship appears to persist. It seems well established that progestogens do decrease the risk of both endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma associated with the administration of estrogen to peri- and postmenopausal women. Such reduction in risk is significant and lower relative risks in estrogen/progestogen treated women have been reported compared to untreated women. This reduction in risk has been reported in a variety of studies. Whitehead and co-workers have provided a clear biochemical mechanism for progestogen protection of the endometrium in the antagonism of estrogen at the endometrial cellular level. The evidence at hand in the literature would suggest that progestogens should be administered for at least 10 days per cycle. In summary, there is good evidence that the addition of a progestin to estrogen therapy prescribed for the symptoms of menopause provides protection from endometrial hyperplasia and related carcinoma. The protection conferred is greater than that afforded by cyclical estrogen-alone therapy, and allows for continuous therapy, hereby providing greater symptomatic relief. There is little evidence for adverse effects caused by the added progestins, but further studies of women on combined therapy will undoubtedly be warranted.     

Endometrial hyperplasia with secretory changes

OBJECTIVE: Secretory changes in endometrial hyperplasia are uncommon. The aim of this study is to review the morphologic and clinical findings of 24 cases of endometrial hyperplasia with secretory changes. METHODS: In 24 patients diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia with secretory changes during 6 years, clinical characteristics such as menopausal status and hormone treatment were correlated with morphological features. A matched age control group of 24 women with conventional endometrial hyperplasia was used to compare the hormonal effect. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were premenopausal. Nine women showed simple hyperplasia without atypia and 15 complex hyperplasia, 7 of them with atypia. Seventeen women were under hormonal treatment at the time of diagnosis, 10 of them with progestins. In 7 patients endometrial adenocarcinoma could be seen, 5 coexisting with endometrial hyperplasia with secretory changes and in 2 appearing after 1 and 4 months. In control group only 2 patients were undergoing progestin hormonal treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Secretory changes can be found in hyperplastic endometrium, particularly in premenopausal women under hormonal treatment with progestins, with the risk of misdiagnosis.     

Resolution of endometrial hyperplasia with adjuvant anastrozole treatment in postmenopausal breast cancer: a case report

BACKGROUND: Endometrial hyperplasia in patients with a history of breast cancer presents a therapeutic dilemma. The standard conservative therapy for hyperplasia, high-dose progestins, is contraindicated in breast cancer. Anastrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, is becoming first-line adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in postmenopausal women and may have protective effects on the endometrium. CASE: A 51-year-old, obese woman with a history of breast cancer presented with a 2-day history of heavy postmenopausal bleeding. Endometrial biopsy demonstrated simple hyperplasia without cellular atypia. After consultation with the patient's oncologist, the patient received adjuvant anastrozole therapy for the breast cancer; it led to resolution of the endometrial hyperplasia. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant therapy with anastrozole may be beneficial in resolving endometrial hyperplasia in patients with breast cancer.     

Fertility-preserving treatment in young women with endometrial cancer

Nonsurgical fertility-preserving treatment of well-differentiated endometrial cancer with systemic progestins has been described for young women who desire to preserve their fertility. The overall response to progestin treatment in 9 retrospective studies is 79% with 79 subsequent live births. Recurrence can be expected in approximately 36-40% of conservatively treated patients who initially responded. Synchronous ovarian cancer has been reported in approximately 9%. However, amongst 162 receiving systemic, continuous treatment with progestins no death caused by cancer has been reported. We review guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up in young women undergoing conservative treatment for endometrial cancer.     

Dose of progestin in postmenopausal-combined hormone therapy and risk of endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE: We studied the impact of progestin dose on this risk. The pattern and number of days per month that progestin is given in postmenopausal combined hormone therapy appears to affect endometrial cancer risk. We assessed the impact of progestin dose on this risk. STUDY DESIGN: A population-based, case-control study included 647 cases with endometrial cancer and 1209 controls. RESULTS: Among users of estrogen with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 10 to 24 days/month, women who took >100 mg/month had an endometrial cancer risk that was equal to that of hormone nonusers (95% CI 0.6-1.7). The corresponding relative risk was 0.8 (95% CI 0.5-1.5) in those who used a lower monthly MPA dose for 10 to 24 days/month. Among users of a continuous combined hormone regimen, the risk of endometrial cancer was low relative to hormone nonusers, regardless of MPA dose. CONCLUSION: Among the combined hormone regimens most commonly used by postmenopausal women today, MPA monthly dose bears little or no relation to endometrial cancer risk.     

Tamoxifen and endometrial carcinoma: alterations in estrogen and progesterone receptors in untreated patients and combination hormonal therapy in advanced neoplasia

Estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors were measured in tumors from patients with previously untreated endometrial carcinoma before and after a 5-day course of tamoxifen citrate. On initial biopsy, 13 of 25 tumors (52%) were progesterone receptor-positive, whereas 21 of 25 tumors (84%) were progesterone receptor-positive after tamoxifen. Grades 1 and 2 tumors were more likely to demonstrate this increased incidence of measurable progesterone receptors. Considering these results, and the work of others who have shown that progesterone receptor-positive metastatic endometrial cancer is more responsive to progestin therapy than are progesterone receptor-negative tumors, we instituted a phase II clinical trial of tamoxifen plus progestin for patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Thus far, however, the 33% total response rate achieved with the combination therapy has not been superior to standard progestin therapy.     

Transvaginal endometrial sonography in postmenopausal women taking tamoxifen

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sonographic measurements of endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women taking adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer, and to correlate sonographic and pathologic findings to symptoms and duration of tamoxifen therapy. METHODS: Medical records and sonograms of 80 postmenopausal women treated for breast cancer with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy were reviewed retrospectively. Endometrial thickness was recorded as a single-layer thickness and considered abnormal when greater than 2.5 mm for postmenopausal women. Sonographic endometrial thickness was correlated to histologic findings, symptoms, and duration of tamoxifen therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-seven of 80 postmenopausal women (69%) had single-layer endometrial thicknesses of 2.5 mm or greater, measured by transvaginal sonography, and 55 of 57 had endometrial biopsies or dilatations and curettage. Biopsies detected 24 cases of abnormal endometria, including endometrial carcinoma (two), breast carcinoma metastatic to the endometrium (one), endometrial polyps (13), tubal metaplasia (three), and benign endometrial hyperplasia (five). Using a single-layer endometrial thickness greater than 2.5 mm by transvaginal ultrasound, 21 of 24 (87.5%) women with abnormal endometria were detected. Women with abnormal pathologic findings had a significantly thicker mean single-layer endometrial thickness than those with normal findings, 7 mm versus 4 mm (P < .01). Twelve women had postmenopausal bleeding, all of whom had a single-layer endometrial thickness greater than 2.5 mm on transvaginal sonography. CONCLUSION: With a sensitivity of detecting endometrial abnormalities of 84%, transvaginal sonography was useful for studying postmenopausal tamoxifen-treated women.     

Involution of PTEN-null endometrial glands with progestin therapy

OBJECTIVES: Loss of PTEN tumor suppressor gene function characterizes most (63%) endometrial precancerous lesions (endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, EIN) and up to 83% of endometrioid endometrial cancers. Because systemic progestins are known to promote involution of precancerous endometrial lesions, we tested the hypothesis that this therapy preferentially leads to clearance of immunohistochemically detected PTEN-null endometrial glands in a variety of histopathologic settings. METHODS: PTEN immunohistochemistry of pre and postprogestin-treated endometria was successfully performed on 17 women presenting with an intake endometrial biopsy diagnosis of "hyperplasia". Intake biopsies were rediagnosed using EIN criteria as 5 normal (proliferative or secretory), 4 anovulatory, 3 polyps, and 5 EIN endometria. The persistence of PTEN-null glands in progestin-treated patients was compared to that seen previously in rebiopsied normal proliferative endometrium of endogenously cycling premenopausal women. RESULTS: Ten of 17 women prehormonal therapy had PTEN-null glands in the initial biopsy, and 90% (9/10) of these disappeared in the postprogestin sample. This contrasts with only 17% (2/12) involution in the endometria of normal cycling women (Fishers exact test P=0.002, Odds Ratio 45). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that progestin therapy promotes involution, or disappearance, of PTEN-null endometrial glands relative to the persistence rate seen for normal cycling women. This effect occurs among PTEN-null glands having a variety of histopathologic presentations.     

Clinical and pathological responses of progestin therapy for non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a prospective study

AIMS: To evaluate the clinical and pathological responses and factors predicting non-responders to various progestins currently prescribed for the treatment of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in the Gynecologic Endocrinology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Thailand, from 1998 to 2003. A 6-month course of progestin therapy was offered to all patients. The clinical response was evaluated from the vaginal bleeding pattern during the first 4 months of treatment. The pathological response was evaluated from the histopathology of the endometrium after completion of the 6-month therapy. RESULTS: Of 250 registered patients, the number of cases qualified for the evaluation of the clinical and pathological response were 198 and 134 cases, respectively, revealing the overall clinical and pathological response rates of 93.4% and 92.5%, respectively. Among 13 clinical non-responders, 84.6% might have associated pelvic pathology. Among 10 pathological non-responders, three had surgical treatment, and progressive disease was found in one case. Significant factors predicting clinical non-responders included a history of prior bleeding (odds ratio [OR] = 8.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.63, 47.53), the presence of associated pelvic pathology (OR = 25.52, 95% CI = 3.21, 203.01), and treatment using progestins other than medroxyprogesterone acetate. Factors predicting pathological non-responders were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The current regimens of progestin therapy for non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia have high response rates. Patients who fail to have a clinical response should be evaluated for associated pelvic pathology. Follow-up endometrial biopsy should be offered to the patients, because 7.5% have persistent or progressive lesions, necessitating aggressive treatment.     

The effect of the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system on endometrial hyperplasia: An Australian study and systematic review

Background: The levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) provides effective contraception and treatment for menorrhagia and is used to prevent endometrial hyperplasia (EH) in women taking unopposed oestrogens.
Aims: The aim of this study was to assess whether the LNG-IUS was also a safe and effective treatment for EH and to conduct a systematic review of the literature.
Methods: A retrospective record review was undertaken in a private gynaecology practice in Brisbane, Australia, and included all women with EH treated with hysterectomy, oral progestins or LNG-IUS between January 2004 and April 2007. Histopathological findings from hysterectomy specimens or endometrial biopsies were used to calculate rates of regression of the EH.
Results: Twenty-one women elected to have a hysterectomy and seven of those (33%) had no persisting hyperplasia at surgery. Twenty-six women had a LNG-IUS inserted at initial hysteroscopy dilatation and curettage or shortly afterwards; seven of those elected to proceed to hysterectomy when their diagnosis was known. Among ten women who used oral progestin treatment, 90% showed initial regression; two with recurrent EH were subsequently treated successfully with LNG-IUS. All 21 women (100%), including one with atypia, treated with LNG-IUS for more than seven weeks had normal endometrial histology on subsequent assessment. No women developed endometrial cancer. Pooled analysis of the published literature gave a 96% regression rate for non-atypical EH treated with LNG-IUS.
Conclusions: These data contribute further evidence that LNG-IUS is a safe and effective method for treating non-atypical EH. Whether LNG-IUS could provide a safe and cost-effective alternative to hysterectomy for atypical EH warrants further examination.     

Durable response of metastatic endometrial carcinoma to treatment with fulvestrant (Faslodex) after prior progestin and anastrozole therapy

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic endometrial carcinoma may respond to hormonal therapy with progestins. There is a need for new therapies for hormone-responsive disease. CASE: We report a patient with metastatic endometrial carcinoma to the lungs, who after progressing on progestin therapy, had a lengthy remission with anastrozole; upon further progression, fulvestrant (Faslodex) was instituted, with a resultant partial remission, which has been sustained for almost 3 years. CONCLUSION: In this case, fulvestrant therapy was successful even in the face of prior anastrozole and megestrol. The activity of fulvestrant in patients with metastatic endometrial carcinoma should be further explored, especially in situations in which the tumor is well differentiated and/or expresses hormone receptors.