Returns on equity to not-for-profit hospitals: theory and implementation.

It is argued that not-for-profit hospitals can be assumed to generate a return on equity capital due, in principle, to competition in the final product market for hospital services and in the capital market. Practical difficulties in identifying claimants to the net income of the firm, as well as the incentive problems of cost-based reimbursement, suggest that a competitive pricing approach is likely to be the appropriate means to provide a reasonable return on equity for the not-for-profit and the for-profit hospital. Implications of the analysis for the correct discount rate in investment decisions are outlined.     

Accounting based risk measures for not-for-profit hospitals.

This paper discusses the issues involved with determining an appropriate discount rate for not-for-profit hospitals and develops a method for computing measures of systematic risk based on a hospital's own accounting data. Data on four hospital management companies are used to demonstrate the method. Results indicate the need for sensitivity analysis in the selection of estimation methods and in the final determination of a discount rate.     

Tax exemption. Challenge and opportunity for not-for-profit hospitals

As healthcare reform is debated over the next several years, not-for-profit hospitals will see increased challenges to their tax-exempt status. Over the past forty years, the requirements for maintaining a tax-exempt status have undergone numerous changes. In the last several years, several states have challenged the right of hospitals to maintain this desired status. As we move toward the mid-1990s, it will be critical for not-for-profit hospitals to demonstrate and communicate their commitment to charitable endeavors.     

Cash holdings of not-for-profit hospitals

Many not-for-profit (NFP) hospitals hold substantial cash reserves. Using a national sample of 608 NFP hospitals over the period 1996-1999, we related theories of cash holdings to NFP hospitals to develop a conceptual framework for understanding cash holdings. We tested whether these hospitals differentially managed operating and strategic cash with respect to establishing target balances and investigated motivations for holding cash. NFP hospitals actively targeted levels of operating cash, but did not target strategic cash balances. Strategic cash balances were positively related to profitability and growth in assets, but negatively associated with the use of debt.     

The five critical areas for effective governance of not-for-profit hospitals

The pressures on hospitals continue to mount. Voluntary boards increasingly are nervous, making management's tasks all the more difficult. We believe the environment demands a new approach to the process of not-for-profit institutional governance. The volunteer board model has worked very well, but it must be adapted to the changed environment. There must be a direct link between the function of institutional governance and the priorities identified through the strategic planning process. It is our observation that truly effective boards have the following areas clearly in focus within the board and between the board and management: (1) a common working definition of "governance"; (2) a clearly defined mission with specific goals and objectives; (3) a well-planned decision-making process; (4) a board structure tailored to the priorities at hand; and (5) an information, reporting, and communication system that keeps the priorities clearly in focus. This article explores these factors and suggests ways to link the board's work directly to the strategic plan.     

Assessing financial outcomes of not-for-profit community hospitals

Health care executives and health professionals often compare financial outcomes among not-for-profit community hospitals, such as operating margins and excess of revenue over expenses. Some performance measures used in these comparisons tend to be uniform yardsticks across community hospitals; other measures may vary significantly by legal, organizational, and reporting-practice differences among hospitals. A unique database of certified financial statements now permits an examination of these reporting-practice differences in the context of a three-year study of financial outcomes for 1,297 hospitals. Six panels are used in the study for partitioning hospitals in response to differences in reporting practices. Revenue over expenses expressed to net patient revenue and to total unrestricted assets are partially explained by 15 factors. The relative outcomes for these measures within a panel are combined with two common yardsticks of financial condition so the 1,297 hospitals can be classified into five status categories: (1) 121 hospitals in a crisis status, (2) 203 hospitals in a warning status, (3) 511 hospitals with average results, (4) 312 hospitals with excellent performance, and (5) 150 hospitals with outstanding performance.     

'Profit' variability in for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals

This paper proposes two tests of the hypothesis that not-for-profit hospitals (NFPs) behave differently than for-profit hospitals. The profit variability test states that the profits of an NFP will be less variable over time than profits of a for-profit hospital if the NFP maximizes utility subject to a profit constraint. The second test examines whether NFP profits respond less to change in exogenous factors, such as Medicare reimbursement rates, than profits of for-profit hospitals. Both tests, performed on panel data from 1983 to 1988, support the hypothesis that NFPs behave differently than for-profit hospitals.     

The economics of for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals

This paper examines the economics of for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals through the prism of capital acquisitions. The exercise suggests that of two hospitals that are equally efficient in producing health care, the for-profit hospital would have to charge higher prices than the not-for-profit hospital would, to break even on capital acquisitions. The reasons for this divergence are (1) the typically higher cost of equity capital that for-profit hospitals face; and (2) the income taxes they must pay. The paper recommends holding tax-exempt hospitals more formally accountable for the social obligation they shoulder, in return for their tax preference.     

The improving efficiency frontier of religious not-for-profit hospitals

By using data-envelopment analysis (DEA), this study evaluates the efficiency of religious not-for-profit hospitals. Hospital executives, healthcare policy makers, taxpayers, and other stakeholders benefit from studies that improve hospital efficiency. Results indicate that overall efficiency in religious hospitals improved from 72% in 1998 to 74% in 2001. What is more important is that the number of religious hospitals operating on the efficiency frontier increased from 40 in 1998 to 47 in 2001. This clearly documents that religious hospitals are becoming more efficient in the management of resources. From a policy perspective, this study highlights the economic importance of encouraging increased efficiency throughout the healthcare industry.