Multicenter evaluation of the in vitro activity of dalbavancin tested against staphylococci and streptococci in 5 European countries: results from the DECIDE Surveillance Program (2007)

Dalbavancin is an antimicrobial lipoglycopeptide agent that has proven activity against Gram-positive pathogens and a once weekly dosing advantage compared with other agents in the glycopeptide class. The most common pathogens isolated from skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) include Staphylococcus aureus and β-hemolytic streptococci (βHS), and dalbavancin has demonstrated excellent activity against these species. This study used 18 medical center laboratories in 5 European countries to assess the activity of dalbavancin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin against S. aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), and βHS. The rank order of potency was dalbavancin (MIC₅₀, 0.06 μg/mL) > teicoplanin (MIC₅₀, 0.5 μg/mL) > vancomycin (MIC₅₀, 2 μg/mL) and dalbavancin (MIC₅₀, 0.06 μg/mL) > teicoplanin and vancomycin (MIC₅₀, 2 μg/mL) against S. aureus and CoNS, respectively. Dalbavancin was the most active glycopeptide tested against βHS with all strains inhibited by ≤0.12 μg/mL. Susceptibility to other antimicrobial classes was also evaluated with noticeable differences demonstrated between countries. Higher methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) rates were observed in Italy (44.2%) and the United Kingdom (36.8%) compared with other countries, but resistance to erythromycin (51.6–83.1%) and clindamycin (5.7–68.4%) among MRSA also varied significantly between countries. The excellent contemporary activity of dalbavancin against common Gram-positive pathogens collected in European countries suggests that dalbavancin could have a role in the treatment of various types of SSSIs.     

Telavancin activity tested against a contemporary collection of Gram-positive pathogens from USA Hospitals (2007-2009)

This study updates the activity of telavancin against Gram-positive pathogens collected from USA hospitals (2007-2009). Telavancin (MIC_50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/mL) was active against coagulase-negative staphylococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (100% susceptible), for which only daptomycin (MIC_50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/mL; 99% susceptible) and quinupristin/dalfopristin (MIC_50/90, ≤0.25-0.5/0.5 μg/mL; 99% susceptible) exhibited similar activity. Telavancin (MIC_50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/mL) inhibited 96.5% of Enterococcus faecalis at the Food and Drug Administration breakpoint (MIC, ≤1 μg/mL), where ampicillin (99.9% susceptible), daptomycin (99.9% susceptible), and linezolid (100% susceptible) also demonstrated high-level coverage. Telavancin inhibited, respectively, 100.0% and 91.7% of VanB-phenotype E. faecalis and E. faecium at ≤1 μg/mL, whereas it was less active against VanA strains. Telavancin was uniformly active against Streptococcus pneumoniae and resistant subsets, and demonstrated good potency (MIC₉₀, 0.06-0.12 μg/mL) against other streptococci, regardless of resistance to other drugs. This assessment reveals potent activity of telavancin against Gram-positive isolates collected from USA hospitals with no evidence of emergence of resistance.     

Worldwide summary of telavancin spectrum and potency against Gram-positive pathogens: 2007 to 2008 surveillance results

Telavancin was approved in the United States and Canada for the treatment of adult patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSSI) caused by susceptible Gram-positive isolates. In this study, telavancin and comparator antimicrobial activities were determined against a total of 24?017 clinical isolates, including Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (CoNS), Enterococcus spp., and various Streptococcus spp. Overall, telavancin was highly active across all geographic regions for S. aureus (MIC_50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/mL; 100.0% susceptible), CoNS (MIC_50/90, 0.12/0.25 μg/mL), vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis (MIC_50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/mL; 100.0% susceptible), Enterococcus faecium (MIC_50/90, 0.06/0.12 μg/mL), Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC_50/90, ≤0.015/0.03 μg/mL), viridans group Streptococcus spp. (MIC_50/90, 0.03/0.06 μg/mL; 100.0% susceptible), and β-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. (MIC_50/90, 0.03/0.12 μg/mL; 99.8% susceptible). Telavancin had potent activity against vancomycin-nonsusceptible, teicoplanin-susceptible (VanB) E. faecalis (MIC_50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/mL) and E. faecium (MIC_50/90, 0.06/0.25 μg/mL). These in vitro results show continued activity for telavancin, which represents an important alternative available for treating cSSSI.     

Update of dalbavancin spectrum and potency in the USA: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2011)

Dalbavancin (DAL) is an investigational lipoglycopeptide with a prolonged serum half-life allowing once weekly dosing. DAL potency was assessed in the 2011 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program among 1555 isolates sampled from all 9 US Census regions. Monitored Gram-positive cocci included Staphylococcus aureus (SA; 1,036/50.4% MRSA), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 115), Enterococcus faecalis (25), E. faecium (31), Streptococcus pyogenes (155), Streptococcus agalactiae (153), and viridans group streptococci (VGS; 40). All susceptibility (S) testing used Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference broth microdilution methods and interpretations. DAL (MIC_50/90, 0.06/0.06 μg/mL) was 8- and 16-fold more active than daptomycin (DAP) and vancomycin (VAN), respectively against SA, with MSSA and MRSA having the same MIC₉₀ results. CoNS was slightly more DAL-S (MIC₅₀, ≤0.03μg/mL). The highest staphylococcal DAL MIC was only 0.25 μg/mL. β-Haemolytic streptococci (βHS) and VGS had DAL MIC results ranging from ≤0.03 to 0.25 μg/mL (MIC₉₀, 0.06–0.12 μg/mL), and only enterococci showed elevated DAL MIC results. VanA phenotype–resistant E. faecalis or E. faecium had DAL MIC values at ≥1 μg/mL; VanB strains were DAL-S (MIC, ≤0.25 μg/mL). All cited DAL quantitative values were consistent with earlier surveillance data (2006–2009), without evidence of MIC creep. In conclusion, year 2011 SENTRY Program data for DAL documents sustained potent activity against SA, CoNS, βHS, VGS, and VAN-S enterococci, which averaged 4- to 32-fold greater than VAN, DAP, or linezolid.     

Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftaroline Tested against Staphylococci with Reduced Susceptibility to Linezolid,Daptomycin, or Vancomycin from U.S. Hospitals, 2008 to 2011

Vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin are very active against staphylococci, but isolates with decreased susceptibility to these antimicrobial agents are isolated sporadically. A total of 19,350 Staphylococcus aureus isolates (51% methicillin resistant [MRSA]) and 3,270 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were collected consecutively from 82 U.S. medical centers from January 2008 to December 2011 and tested for susceptibility against ceftaroline and comparator agents by the reference broth microdilution method. Among S. aureus strains, 14 isolates (0.07%) exhibited decreased susceptibility to linezolid (MIC, ≥8 μg/ml), 18 (0.09%) to daptomycin (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml), and 369 (1.9%) to vancomycin (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml; 368 isolates at 2 μg/ml and 1 at 4 μg/ml). Fifty-one (1.6%) CoNS were linezolid resistant (MIC, ≥8 μg/ml), and four (0.12%) were daptomycin nonsusceptible (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml). Ceftaroline was very active against S. aureus overall (MIC_50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml; 98.5% susceptible), including MRSA (MIC_50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml; 97.2% susceptible). All daptomycin-nonsusceptible and 85.7% of linezolid-resistant S. aureus isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. Against S. aureus isolates with a vancomycin MIC of ≥2 μg/ml, 91.9, 96.2, and 98.9% were susceptible to ceftaroline, daptomycin, and linezolid, respectively. CoNS strains were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC_50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml; 99.1% inhibited at ≤1 μg/ml), including methicillin-resistant (MIC_50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml), linezolid-resistant (MIC_50/90, 0.5/0.5 μg/ml), and daptomycin-nonsusceptible (4 isolates; MIC range, 0.03 to 0.12 μg/ml) strains. In conclusion, ceftaroline demonstrated potent in vitro activity against staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to linezolid, daptomycin, or vancomycin, and it may represent a valuable treatment option for infections caused by these multidrug-resistant staphylococci.     

Antimicrobial activity of daptomycin tested against Staphylococcus aureus with vancomycin MIC of 2 μg/mL isolated in the United States and European hospitals (2006–2008)

We evaluated the activity of daptomycin (minimum inhibitory [MIC] and bactericidal [MBC] concentration) against Staphylococcus aureus strains with elevated (2 μg/mL) vancomycin MIC values. A total of 410 contemporary clinical S. aureus isolates (282 from the United States and 128 from Europe) with vancomycin MIC values of 2 μg/mL were tested by reference broth microdilution method. Vancomycin MBC and the presence of vancomycin-heteroresistant population (heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus [hVISA]) were evaluated in 31 randomly selected strains. Overall, 97.3% of isolates were susceptible to daptomycin (MIC₉₀, 0.5 μg/mL). Daptomycin exhibited potent bactericidal activity with MBC values at the MIC concentration (74.2%) or 1 log₂ dilution above the MIC (25.8%). In contrast, vancomycin MBC was ≥32 μg/mL in 12.9% of strains tolerance, and 25.8% of strains tested positive for hVISA (AB BIODISK GRD Etest, Solna, Sweden). In conclusion, S. aureus strains with vancomycin MIC of 2 μg/mL showed high rates of hVISA and vancomycin tolerance. Daptomycin retained potent bactericidal activity against S. aureus with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin.     

Antimicrobial activity of daptomycin in comparison to glycopeptides and other antimicrobials when tested against numerous species of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus

Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (CoNS) represent a major cause of bloodstream infections, especially in patients with prosthetic devices and intravenous catheters. We evaluated the activity of daptomycin in comparison to vancomycin and teicoplanin against a large collection of 22,024 CoNS isolates causing clinically significant infections from 283 medical centers over 9 years (2002-2010) and tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution methods against daptomycin and numerous comparators. Overall, daptomycin (MIC(50/90), 0.25/0.5 μg/mL) inhibited 99.8% of CoNS at the susceptible breakpoint of ≤1 μg/mL and was 4- to 16-fold more active than vancomycin (MIC(50/90), 1/2 μg/mL; >99.9% susceptible). All species showed ≥99.6% susceptibility to daptomycin, except Staphylococcus auricularis (95.1%), S. capitis (99.0%), S. warneri (98.8%), and S. sciuri. S.sciuri represented only 0.2% of the collection (46 strains) and exhibited decreased susceptibility to daptomycin (MIC(50/90), 1/2 μg/mL; 71.7% susceptible). In contrast, S. sciuri exhibited high susceptibility to vancomycin and teicoplanin (highest MIC at 2 μg/mL for both drugs). In summary, daptomycin exhibited species-specific activity among CoNS, especially versus S. sciuri. No correlation between decreased susceptibility to daptomycin and the glycopeptides tested was observed.     

An international activity and spectrum analysis of linezolid: ZAAPS Program results for 2011

Through a continuing resistance surveillance monitoring program, linezolid was shown to maintain its spectrum and potency against a collection of 8059 clinically relevant Gram-positive strains collected from patients at 79 medical centers in 33 countries and Hong Kong. Linezolid MIC₉₀ values were 2 μg/mL for methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and enterococci, and the MIC₉₀ value was 1 μg/mL for coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), β-hemolytic streptococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and viridans group streptococci. Reference broth microdilution susceptibility testing for linezolid demonstrated a 99.83% susceptibility rate for all organisms. All S. aureus were inhibited by ≤2 μg/mL. Three (0.3%) of 928 strains of CoNS had a linezolid MIC of 4 μg/mL and contained the cfr resistance gene; 1 also had a mutation in L3. There were 14 linezolid-resistant strains detected from 7 countries (Brazil [5], France [1], Germany [2] Greece [2], Italy [2], Ireland [1], and Spain [1]) representing 5 species (E. faecium, S. capitis, S. epidermidis, S. hominis, S. lugdenensis). A mobile cfr gene was noted in 2 species having elevated linezolid MIC values; one was a S. haemolyticus isolate with a MIC at 4 μg/mL. Resistance rates were as follows for the 6 groups of organisms sampled in the 2011 ZAAPS Program: CoNS, 1.2%; enterococci, 0.39%; among S aureus, S. pneumoniae, viridans group streptococci, and β-hemolytic streptococci, no resistance was detected. As the activities of commonly used antimicrobials continue to be compromised by evolving resistance mechanisms in Gram-positive pathogens, linezolid-resistant strains remain uncommon and without increasing occurrence.     

Efficacy of vancomycin and daptomycin against Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected over 29 years

We investigated vancomycin and daptomycin efficacy for Staphylococcus aureus isolates at our institution by testing 221 methicillin-sensitive and 299 methicillin-resistant isolates recovered from serious infections between 1979 and 2007 using a microdilution method. The MIC₉₀'s for vancomycin remained constant at 2 μg/mL for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). For MSSA, the geometric mean vancomycin MICs remained at 1.1 μg/mL but varied from 1.1 to 1.7 for MRSA. Tolerance to vancomycin was seen in 6.5% of MRSA and 10.5% of MSSA. Daptomycin MIC₉₀'s remained at ≤1 μg/mL, and the daptomycin concentration at which 90% of the strains were killed (MBC₉₀) remained at 2 μg/ml. Over 29 years, no trend was detected in vancomycin or daptomycin susceptibilities. Daptomycin had excellent inhibitory and bactericidal activities against all strains throughout the years. Although vancomycin's inhibitory activity was consistent over time, vancomycin-tolerant strains whose presence was not predicted by their MIC were found.     

European glycopeptide susceptibility survey of Gram-positive bacteria for 1995

In the European Glycopeptide Susceptibility Survey 7078 Gram-positive isolates collected in 1995 from 70 centers in 9 countries of Western Europe were examined, using a standardized, quantitative susceptibility testing method. Of the 7078 isolates, 6824 (96.4%) were tested by the national coordinating centers. Teicoplanin (mode MIC 0.5 μg/mL) was generally twice as active as vancomycin (mode MIC 1 μg/mL) against Staphylococcus aureus (n = 2852). All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (MIC ≤4 μg/mL) and all but four to teicoplanin (MIC ≤8 μg/mL); these four isolates were of intermediate susceptibility (MIC 16 μg/mL). With coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 1444), the distribution of MIC of teicoplanin was wider than for vancomycin. Two and two-tenths percent of coagulase-negative staphylococci excluding Staphylococcus haemolyticus required 16 μg/mL teicoplanin for inhibition (intermediate) and 0.4% ≥32 μg/mL (resistant). Among isolates of S. haemolyticus, 4.4% were of intermediate susceptibility (MIC 16 μg/mL) and 3.3% were resistant (MIC ≥32 μg/mL) to teicoplanin. However, this species represented only 6.3% of the isolates of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. Generally, teicoplanin (mode MIC ≤0.12 μg/mL) was four to eight times more active than vancomycin (mode MIC ≤0.5 μg/mL) against the 770 streptococcal isolates. Glycopeptide-susceptible Enterococcus spp. (n = 1695) were generally four times more susceptible to teicoplanin (mode MIC 0.25 μg/mL) than to vancomycin (mode MIC 1 μg/mL). Combined vancomycin and teicoplanin (VanA phenotype) resistance was observed more frequently (9.3%) in isolates of Enterococcus faecium than in Enterococcus faecalis (0.8%). Four isolates of unspeciated enterococci (1.4%) also expressed this resistance phenotype. Four isolates of E. faecium and four of E. faecalis expressed the VanB-type (low-level, vancomycin only) resistance. Spain was the only country not to submit resistant E. faecium strains while resistant E. faecalis isolates came only from Spain and Italy.     

In vitro activity of dalbavancin and telavancin against staphylococci and streptococci isolated from patients in Canadian hospitals: results of the CANWARD 2007-2009 study

Two novel lipoglycopeptides, dalbavancin and telavancin, and relevant comparative agents were tested for in vitro activity against clinical isolates of staphylococci and streptococci collected in the cross-Canada surveillance study, CANWARD, in 2007-2009. The rank order of potency (based on MIC(90) [μg/mL], i.e., the concentration of antimicrobial agent required to inhibit the growth of 90% of isolates tested) of glycopeptides against both Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis was dalbavancin (0.06 μg/mL) >telavancin (0.5 μg/mL) > vancomycin (1-2 μg/mL); concurrent susceptibility or resistance to oxacillin in staphylococci did not affect potency of glycopeptides. Dalbavancin and telavancin also demonstrated potent activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, including penicillin-resistant isolates (MIC(90), ≤ 0.03 μg/mL; ≤ 0.06 μg/mL), and Streptococcus pyogenes (≤ 0.03 μg/mL; 0.06 μg/mL). Based on their robust in vitro activities, dalbavancin and telavancin have the potential to treat Gram-positive infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.     

Stability of linezolid activity in an era of mobile oxazolidinone resistance determinants: results from the 2009 Zyvox® Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum program

Linezolid is the only oxazolidinone agent approved for clinical use and has been administered to millions of patients over nearly a decade, becoming an important therapeutic alternative for infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-positive pathogens. Resistance is due to mutations in 23S rRNA and the ribosomal proteins L3 and L4 and, more recently, the mobile cfr gene (causes resistance to several antimicrobial classes). Using reference broth microdilution methods in a central reference laboratory design, MIC values were obtained during the 2009 Zyvox® Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum program (5754 sampled strains from 22 countries), and the following MIC₉₀ values were obtained for the leading pathogen or species groups: Staphylococcus aureus (2 μg/mL), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 1 μg/mL), Enterococcus spp. (2 μg/mL), and 3 groups of streptococci (1 μg/mL) including Streptococcus pneumoniae. Linezolid-resistant strains (8 or 0.14% overall) that were not Staphylococcus aureus were observed in 5 nations and included CoNS (0.48%) having the mobile cfr gene. The results of this study demonstrate that linezolid continues to be effective in vitro against MDR pathogens, and the resistance rates appear stable.     

Activity of Debio1452, a FabI Inhibitor with Potent Activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus spp., Including Multidrug-Resistant Strains

Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are responsible for a wide variety of human infections. The investigational antibacterial Debio1450 (previously AFN-1720), a prodrug of Debio1452 (previously AFN-1252), specifically targets staphylococci without significant activity against other Gram-positive or Gram-negative species. Debio1452 inhibits FabI, an enzyme critical to fatty acid biosynthesis in staphylococci. The activity of Debio1452 against CoNS, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), including significant clones, was determined. A globally diverse collection of 574 patient isolates from 35 countries was tested that included CoNS (6 species, 103 strains), MSSA (154 strains), MRSA (163 strains), and molecularly characterized strains (including spa-typed MRSA clones; 154 strains). The isolates were tested for susceptibility by CLSI broth microdilution methods against Debio1452 and 10 comparators. The susceptibility rates for the comparators were determined using CLSI and EUCAST breakpoint criteria. All S. aureus and CoNS strains were inhibited by Debio1452 concentrations of ≤0.12 and ≤0.5 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC₅₀s for MSSA, MRSA, and molecularly characterized MRSA strains were 0.004 μg/ml, and the MIC₉₀s ranged from 0.008 to 0.03 μg/ml. The MICs were higher for the CoNS isolates (MIC_50/90, 0.015/0.12 μg/ml). Among S. aureus strains, resistance was common for erythromycin (61.6%), levofloxacin (49.0%), clindamycin (27.6%), tetracycline (15.7%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (7.0%). Debio1452 demonstrated potent activity against MSSA, MRSA, and CoNS. Debio1452 showed significantly greater activity overall (MIC₅₀, 0.004 μg/ml) than the other agents tested against these staphylococcal species, which included dominant MRSA clones and strains resistant to currently utilized antimicrobial agents.     

In vitro activity of tedizolid against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus lugdunensis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus from Europe and the United States

Staphylococcus lugdunensis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus are unique among CoNS in that the former often causes aggressive disease, while the latter consistently exhibits high rates of multidrug resistance. We evaluated the in vitro susceptibility of contemporary (2012–2013) isolates from both pathogens to tedizolid and comparators, using standard methodology. Results were interpreted using CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. Overall, 106 S. lugdunensis and 103 S. haemolyticus isolates were collected from 51 medical centers in the United States and 30 centers in 18 European countries. Tedizolid showed good activity against S. lugdunensis (MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀: 0.12/0.12?mg/L) and S. haemolyticus (MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀: 0.12/0.12?mg/L), inhibiting all isolates at MIC ≤0.25?mg/L. Based on the EUCAST breakpoint for staphylococci and when substituting the CLSI breakpoint for Staphylococcus aureus, all isolates were tedizolid susceptible. All isolates were also susceptible to linezolid, but the in vitro potency of tedizolid was 4-fold greater than that of linezolid against both S. lugdunensis and S. haemolyticus, based on MIC₉₀ values. S. lugdunensis exhibited ≥99% susceptibility to vancomycin, teicoplanin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; 7% of isolates were resistant to tetracycline, 11% to clindamycin, and 2% were methicillin-resistant. S. haemolyticus exhibited high rates of resistance to commonly used anti-staphylococcal agents: 71% of isolates were resistant to methicillin, 36%–37% to clindamycin, and 30%–50% to gentamicin. These in vitro findings suggest that tedizolid could be an alternative treatment option for infections due to these medically important CoNS pathogens. Additional clinical evaluation and continued surveillance of tedizolid in vitro activity against S. lugdunensis and S. haemolyticus are warranted.     

Use of In Vitro Vancomycin Testing Results To Predict Susceptibility to Oritavancin,a New Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptide

Oritavancin is a recently approved lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent with activity against Gram-positive pathogens. Its extended serum elimination half-life and concentration-dependent killing enable single-dose treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. At the time of regulatory approval, new agents, including oritavancin, are not offered in the most widely used susceptibility testing devices and therefore may require application of surrogate testing using a related antimicrobial to infer susceptibility. To evaluate vancomycin as a predictive susceptibility marker for oritavancin, 26,993 recent Gram-positive organisms from U.S. and European hospitals were tested using reference MIC methods. Organisms included Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), beta-hemolytic streptococci (BHS), viridans group streptococci (VGS), and enterococci (ENT). These five major pathogen groups were analyzed by comparing results with FDA-approved susceptible breakpoints for both drugs, as well as those suggested by epidemiological cutoff values and supported by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses. Vancomycin susceptibility was highly accurate (98.1 to 100.0%) as a surrogate for oritavancin susceptibility among the indicated pathogen species. Furthermore, direct MIC comparisons showed high oritavancin potencies, with vancomycin/oritavancin MIC₉₀ results of 1/0.06, 2/0.06, 0.5/0.12,1/0.06, and >16/0.06 μg/ml for S. aureus, CoNS, BHS, VGS, and ENT, respectively. In conclusion, vancomycin demonstrated acceptable accuracy as a surrogate marker for predicting oritavancin susceptibility when tested against the indicated pathogens. In contrast, 93.3% of vancomycin-nonsusceptible enterococci had oritavancin MIC values of ≤0.12 μg/ml, indicating a poor predictive value of vancomycin for oritavancin resistance against these organisms. Until commercial oritavancin susceptibility testing devices are readily available, isolates that when tested show vancomycin susceptibility can be inferred to be susceptible to oritavancin by using FDA-approved breakpoints.     

Telavancin In Vitro Activity against a Collection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates,Including Resistant Subsets,from the United States

Telavancin had MIC₅₀, MIC₉₀, and MIC₁₀₀ values of 0.03, 0.06, and 0.12 μg/ml, respectively, against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and non-multidrug-resistant (non-MDR) and MDR subsets. MRSA with elevated MIC values for vancomycin (2 to 4 μg/ml) or daptomycin (1 to 2 μg/ml) had telavancin MIC₅₀ (0.06 μg/ml) values 2-fold higher than those of isolates with lower MIC results (MIC₅₀, 0.03 μg/ml). However, telavancin had MIC₉₀ and MIC₁₀₀ results of 0.06 and 0.12 μg/ml (100% susceptible), respectively, regardless of the MRSA subset.     

United States resistance surveillance results for linezolid (LEADER Program for 2007)

The LEADER Program (2007) monitors for emerging linezolid resistance in sampled US medical centers, initiated in 2004. For the current reported year, the number of sites participating was increased from 50 to 60 institutions representing all 9 US census regions with 100 target organisms per site (6305 isolates, 105.1% compliance to protocol design). The organisms tested by reference broth microdilution methods were Staphylococcus aureus (3318), coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS, 1020), enterococci (705), Streptococcus pneumoniae (622), and viridans group (249) or β-hemolytic streptococci (391); also, D-test was used to determine inducible clindamycin resistance in S. aureus strains. Linezolid remained very potent against all sampled species with MIC₉₀ results ranging from 1 μg/mL (streptococci and CoNS) to 2 μg/mL (S. aureus and enterococci). Only 0.44% of sampled strains were nonsusceptible to linezolid, compared with 0.45% in 2006. The nonsusceptible strains (23) were usually staphylococci (20) or Enterococcus faecium (8), each with defined target mutations (G2576T, 24 strains) or a novel mobile cfr element in staphylococci (2 strains). In conclusion, linezolid activity sampled by the 4th year of this LEADER Program showed sustained potency and spectrum (99.56% susceptibility). Although the nonsusceptible strain isolation rates remained stable, a new plasmid-mediated ribosomal-based resistance mechanism emerged in S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis strains from Arizona and Ohio. The LEADER Program appears to be an effective and sensitive surveillance tool to detect novel resistance phenotypes and genotypes.     

Ceftaroline activity against organisms isolated from respiratory tract infections in USA hospitals: results from the AWARE program, 2009–2011

The Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation Program monitors the activity of ceftaroline and comparator agents tested against pathogens causing either respiratory or skin and soft tissue infections. A total of 7733 isolates from patients in 80 medical centers across the United States (USA) identified as respiratory tract pathogens by the infection type and/or specimen site recorded by the submitting laboratory during 2009–2011 were evaluated. There were 3360 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 1799 Haemophilus influenzae, 1087 Staphylococcus aureus, 678 Moraxella catarrhalis, 459 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 223 Escherichia coli, and 127 Klebsiella oxytoca. Annual penicillin resistance among S. pneumoniae ranged from 21.9 to 24.3%. All S. pneumoniae strains were inhibited at a ceftaroline MIC of ≤0.5 μg/mL with 100.0% of isolates categorized as susceptible. Ceftaroline was 16-fold more active than ceftriaxone and 32-fold more active than amoxicillin-clavulanate against penicillin-resistant pneumococci. Only 49.8% of the penicillin-resistant isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone. There were a total of 1087 S. aureus (48.9% methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]) isolates, and the yearly MRSA rate ranged from 47.9 to 49.7%. The ceftaroline MIC_50/90 for S. aureus was at 0.25/1 μg/mL; 98.2% susceptible and no resistant strains (≥4 μg/mL). Ceftaroline activity against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates (MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀, 0.25 and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively; 100% susceptible) was 2- to 4-fold greater than for MRSA (MIC_50/90, 0.5/1 μg/mL; 96.2% susceptible). The ceftriaxone MIC₉₀ for MSSA was 4 μg/mL. Ceftaroline was active against H. influenzae (MIC_50/90 ≤0.015/0.03 μg/mL; 100.0% susceptible) and against M. catarrhalis (MIC_50/90, 0.06/0.12 μg/mL). Ceftaroline was active against non–extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype strains of Enterobacteriaceae but not against ESBL-positive phenotype strains. In summary, ceftaroline was highly active against a large collection of bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with respiratory tract infections in the USA during 2009 through 2011.     

Antimicrobial susceptibility of daptomycin and comparator agents tested against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: trend analysis of a 6-year period in US medical centers (2005-2010)

We evaluated daptomycin activity trends against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE; MIC, ≥8 μg/mL) in a 6-year period (2005–2010) following US regulatory release for clinical use. Consecutive, unique patient strains of clinical significance were collected in 32 US medical centers and susceptibility tested in a central laboratory against daptomycin and various comparator agents by reference broth microdilution methods. A total of 22 858 S. aureus (12 181 [53.3%] MRSA), 4312 Enterococcus faecalis (195 [4.5%] VRE), and 2462 Enterococcus faecium (1867 [75.8%] VRE) were evaluated. Daptomycin susceptibility rates were 99.94%, 99.98%, and 99.68% for S. aureus, E. faecalis, and E. faecium, respectively. Among MRSA (daptomycin MIC_50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/mL), only 13 (0.11%) daptomycin-non-susceptible (MIC, ≥2 μg/mL) isolates were observed with no MIC creep over the study interval. Daptomycin was very active against vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis (MIC_50/90, 1/2 μg/mL) and E. faecium (MIC_50/90, 2/2 μg/mL). Among VRE, only 4 daptomycin-non-susceptible isolates (all E. faecium) were detected. In conclusion, daptomycin demonstrated sustained activity against an extensive collection of clinical isolates of MRSA and VRE from numerous US medical centers over the last 6 monitored years.     

In vitro antimicrobial activity and MIC quality control guidelines of RPR 106972 (RPR 112808/RPR106950): A novel orally administered streptogramin combination

RPR 106972 is a novel oral streptogramin combination with reported therapeutic potency against Gram-positive and certain respiratory tract pathogens. MICs for RPR 106972, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and seven comparison drugs were determined by the reference methods against 337 strains selected to define spectrum and potency. RPR 106972 demonstrated antimicrobial activity against oxacillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MIC ranges of 0.12 to 2 μg/ml and 0.5 to 2 μg/ml, respectively), and coagulase-negative staphylococci were also inhibited by RPR 106972 (MIC_90′, ≤ 0.5 μg/ml) and quinupristin/dalfopristin (MIC_90′, ≤ 0.25 μg/ml). Against all streptococcal strains tested (including penicillin-resistant pneumococcus), RPR 106972 was highly active with MIC results at ≤ 1 μg/ml. RPR 106972 inhibited Corynebacterium jeikeium (MIC_90′ 0.5 μg/ml), Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC_90′, 0.25 μg/ml), and some Haemophilus influenzae (MIC_50′, 2 μg/ml). RPR 106972 and quinupristin/dalfopristin demonstrated little activity against Enterococcus faecalis (MIC₉₀s, 4 to 32 μg/ml) as compared to Enterococcus faecium (MIC₉₀s, 0.5 to 1 μg/ml) and other Enterococcus ssp. (MIC₉₀s, 1 μg/ml). Studies to establish MIC quality-control guidelines indicated the following ranges: for E. faecalis ATCC 29212, 0.5 to 4 μg/ml; for S. aureus ATCC 29213, 0.25 to 1 μg/ml; and for Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619, 0.06 to 0.5 μg/ml. The results of this study indicate that the in vitro activity of RPR 106972 against Gram-positive bacteria and selected Gram-negative respiratory organisms is promising and warrants additional studies of pharmacokinetics, and in vivo infection model dynamics.