Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of the ��OptEase�� Vena Cava Filter

Purpose  

To assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of the OptEase inferior vena cava (IVC) filter.     

Significant Caval Penetration by the Celect Inferior Vena Cava Filter: Attributable to Filter Design?

This report describes transmural penetration of the inferior vena cava (IVC) by a newly introduced IVC filter within 9 days of its placement. A computed tomographic study demonstrated filter penetration with one of the primary struts lodging in the uncinate process of the pancreas. Because of the close resemblance of this new filter to another filter that has not been associated with penetration injuries, the key differences between the two designs were examined and the determination was made that the new filter, unlike the older one, has unprotected primary struts. Only filters with an unprotected primary strut design have been associated with penetration injuries such as the one described in this case.     

Bird’s Nest Filter Causing Symptomatic Hydronephrosis Following Transmural Penetration of the Inferior Vena Cava

We report a case of symptomatic hydronephrosis caused by transcaval penetration of a Birds Nest filter. Perforation of the wall of the inferior vena cava (IVC) following insertion of a caval filter is a well-recognized complication. Whilst two cases of hydronephrosis have been described with Greenfield filters, no case involving a Birds Nest filter has been reported previously.     

Introducer Curving Technique for the Prevention of Tilting of Transfemoral G��nther Tulip Inferior Vena Cava Filter

Objective

To determine whether the introducer curving technique is useful in decreasing the degree of tilting of transfemoral Tulip filters.

Materials and Methods

The study sample group consisted of 108 patients with deep vein thrombosis who were enrolled and planned to undergo thrombolysis, and who accepted transfemoral Tulip filter insertion procedure. The patients were randomly divided into Group C and Group T. The introducer curving technique was Adopted in Group T. The post-implantation filter tilting angle (ACF) was measured in an anteroposterior projection. The retrieval hook adhering to the vascular wall was measured via tangential cavogram during retrieval.

Results

The overall average ACF was 5.8 ± 4.14 degrees. In Group C, the average ACF was 7.1 ± 4.52 degrees. In Group T, the average ACF was 4.4 ± 3.20 degrees. The groups displayed a statistically significant difference (t = 3.573, p = 0.001) in ACF. Additionally, the difference of ACF between the left and right approaches turned out to be statistically significant (7.1 ± 4.59 vs. 5.1 ± 3.82, t = 2.301, p = 0.023). The proportion of severe tilt (ACF ≥ 10°) in Group T was significantly lower than that in Group C (9.3% vs. 24.1%, χ² = 4.267, p = 0.039). Between the groups, the difference in the rate of the retrieval hook adhering to the vascular wall was also statistically significant (2.9% vs. 24.2%, χ² = 5.030, p = 0.025).

Conclusion

The introducer curving technique appears to minimize the incidence and extent of transfemoral Tulip filter tilting.     

Factors Associated with Advanced Inferior Vena Cava Filter Removals: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 203 Patients Over 7 Years

Purpose

To identify factors associated with advanced inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) retrieval to raise awareness on technical considerations, retrieval efficiency, and patient safety.

Materials and Methods

A single-center retrospective review was performed of 203 consecutive retrievable IVC filters placed between 2007 and 2014. Attempted retrievals were classified as advanced if the routine “snare and sheath” technique was initially unsuccessful after multiple attempts, or an alternate endovascular maneuver or access site was utilized. Patient and filter characteristics were recorded.

Results

203 attempted retrievals were reviewed (48.7 % male, 51.2 % female, mean age 52.7 years, mean dwell time 109 days). Advanced retrievals were observed in 20 patients (9.8 %) (15 females, 5 males). Fluoroscopy time (p ≤ 0.01, 34.3 ± 21.1 and 5.3 ± 4.5 min for advanced retrievals and routine retrievals respectively, same below), gender (p = 0.031), and retrieval tilt angle (p ≤ 0.01, 5.7 ± 5.10° vs. 11.9 ± 11.03°) were associated with advanced retrievals. Females were 3.16 times more likely to have an advanced retrieval performed than males with a significantly higher tilt angle in those with advanced retrieval. History of cancer (p = 0.502), dwell time (p = 0.916), retrieval caval diameter (p = 0.053), placement caval diameter (p = 0.365), filter type (p = 0.710), strut perforation (p = 0.506), placement tilt angle (p = 0.311), and age (p = 0.558) were not found significantly associated with advanced retrievals.

Conclusions

Women are at increased risk for advanced filter retrieval secondary to a significant change in filter tilt over time compared to men, independent of filter type or competing demographic or filter risks, likely placing them at increased risk for higher procedural fluoroscopy times.

     

Evaluation of a Device Combining an Inferior Vena Cava Filter and a Central Venous Catheter for Preventing Pulmonary Embolism Among Critically Ill Trauma Patients

Purpose

To evaluate efficacy and safety of a novel device that combines an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and central venous catheter (CVC) for prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE) in critically ill patients.

Temporary and Permanent Inferior Vena Cava Filter Combination in a Young Patient: To Implant or Not to Implant?

The decision to implant vena cava filters, either temporary or permanent, is difficult in young patients. We present the case of a young man with pulmonary embolism in whom temporary and permanent inferior vena cava filters were implanted. The decision process is discussed in relation to the current literature.     

Compression of the Inferior Vena Cava by the Right Iliac Artery: A Rare Variant of May–Thurner Syndrome

May–Thurner syndrome is known as compression of the left common iliac vein by the right common iliac artery. We describe a case of an atypical compression of the inferior vena cava by the right common iliac artery secondary to a high aortic bifurcation. Despite an extensive collateral network, there was a significant venous gradient between the iliac veins and the inferior vena cava above the compression. After stenting the venous pressure gradient disappeared. Follow-up 4 months later revealed a good clinical response with a patent stent.     

Endovascular Iliocaval Stent Reconstruction for Inferior Vena Cava Filter–Associated Iliocaval Thrombosis: Approach,Technical Success,Safety, and Two-Year Outcomes in 120 Patients

Purpose

To report technical success, outcomes, and patency of iliocaval stent reconstruction for inferior vena cava (IVC) filter–bearing iliocaval thrombosis.

Günther Tulip Retrievable Vena Cava Filter: results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association

PURPOSE: To report data collected by the Canadian Registry of the Günther Tulip Retrievable Filter (GTF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 1998 and December 2000, 90 patients at eight hospitals underwent implantation of 91 GTFs. There were 45 male patients and 45 female patients, age 17-88 years, with a mean age of 49 years. Indications for filter placement were pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with a contraindication to anticoagulation in 83 patients, prophylaxis after massive PE in one, prophylaxis for proximal free-floating thrombus in one, and prophylaxis with no DVT or PE in six patients (major trauma, n = 4; high preoperative risk, n = 2). GTF retrieval was attempted in selected patients from a right internal jugular vein approach. RESULTS: One GTF was inadvertently placed in the right iliac vein and could not be retrieved. There were no other major placement complications. GTF retrieval was attempted in 52 patients (53 GTFs); 52 GTFs were successfully retrieved from 51 patients. Implantation times were 2-25 days (mean, 9 d). Of these 51 patients, 37 underwent follow-up for 5-420 days (mean, 103 d) after filter retrieval. Four patients (8% of retrieved GTFs) required reinsertion of a permanent filter 17-167 days (mean, 78 d) after GTF retrieval as a result of bleeding from anticoagulation (n = 2) or because the patient required further surgery (n = 2). One other patient had recurrent DVT 230 days after retrieval; no PE or other complication was documented in the retrieval group. GTFs were not retrieved from 39 patients for various reasons. Of these 39 patients, 25 underwent follow-up 7-420 days (mean, 85 d) after filter placement. Two patients developed filter occlusion (5%); no other complications were documented. CONCLUSION: The GTF has a broad range of utility: it can be used as a permanent filter or retrieved after implantation periods of 15 days and possibly longer. However, indications for retrieval require further study, as does the maximum implantation time.     

Caval Penetration by Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: A Retrospective Comparison of Option and Günther Tulip Filters

PurposeTo compare the frequency of vena caval penetration by the struts of the Option and Günther Tulip cone filters on postplacement computed tomography (CT) imaging.Materials and MethodsAll patients who had an Option or Günther Tulip inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placed between January 2010 and May 2012 were identified retrospectively from medical records. Of the 208 IVC filters placed, the positions of 58 devices (21 Option filters, 37 Günther Tulip filters [GTFs]) were documented on follow-up CT examinations obtained for reasons unrelated to filter placement. In cases when multiple CT studies were obtained after placement, each study was reviewed, for a total of 80 examinations. Images were assessed for evidence of caval wall penetration by filter components, noting the number of penetrating struts and any effect on pericaval tissues.ResultsPenetration of at least one strut was observed in 17% of all filters imaged by CT between 1 and 447 days following placement. Although there was no significant difference in the overall prevalence of penetration when comparing the Option filter and GTF (Option, 10%; GTF, 22%), only GTFs showed time-dependent penetration, with penetration becoming more likely after prolonged indwelling times. No patient had damage to pericaval tissues or documented symptoms attributed to penetration.ConclusionsAlthough the Günther Tulip and Option filters exhibit caval penetration at CT imaging, only the GTF exhibits progressive penetration over time.     

Complications of Celect,Günther Tulip,and Greenfield Inferior Vena Cava Filters on CT Follow-up: A Single-Institution Experience

PurposeTo evaluate and compare the rates of complications on follow-up computed tomography (CT) studies of patients with Celect, Günther Tulip, and Greenfield inferior vena cava (IVC) filters.Materials and MethodsRetrospective review of CT studies obtained 0–1,987 days after infrarenal placement of an IVC filter identified 255 Celect, 160 Tulip, and 50 Greenfield filters. Follow-up CT studies were independently evaluated by two observers for IVC perforation, contact with adjacent organs, and filter fracture. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with higher rates of IVC perforation, including age, IVC diameter, sex, and history of malignancy.ResultsIVC perforation was observed in 126 of 255 Celect filters (49%) with a mean follow-up of 277 days, 69 of 160 Tulip filters (43%) with a mean follow-up of 437 days, and one of 50 Greenfield filters (2%) with a mean follow-up of 286 days. A significantly higher IVC perforation rate was observed in women (45.5%) compared with men (30.8%; P = .002) and in patients with a history of malignancy (43.7%) compared with patients with no history of malignancy (29.9%; P < .001). Filter fracture was rare, observed in two of 255 Celect filters (0.8%), one of 160 Tulip filters (0.6%), and none of 50 Greenfield filters.ConclusionsNo significant difference was observed in IVC perforation rate between Celect and Tulip filters. Greenfield filters had a significantly lower rate of IVC perforation than Celect and Tulip filters. Higher IVC perforation rates were observed in women and patients with a history of malignancy.     

Transarterial Chemoembolization of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Controlled Trial

Purpose

To prospectively assess feasibility, safety, and cytoreductive effect of transarterial chemoembolization on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using drug-eluting embolic agent (DEE) saturated with doxorubicin compared with transarterial embolization (TAE).

Comparison of Stable and Unstable Ethiodized Oil Emulsions for Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of a Single-Center Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

To compare the stability of stable and unstable water-in-oil emulsions and the efficacy and safety of these emulsions in a single-center, prospective double-blind trial of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Percutaneous Endovascular Creation of an Inferior Vena Cava in a Patient with Caval Agenesis,Budd–Chiari Syndrome,and Iliofemorocaval Thrombosis

A 29-year-old woman with acute iliofemorocaval thrombosis was discovered to have suprarenal caval agenesis with azygous continuation, hepatic congestion, and fibrosis as a result of chronic Budd–Chiari syndrome. Three staged procedures were performed: pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of acute thromboses, transfemoral liver biopsy and hemodynamic assessment, and percutaneous endovascular creation of a “neocava” lined with endografts. Symptomatic improvement and patency were maintained at 12-week follow-up.