Minimally Invasive Approach for Redo Mitral Valve Surgery: A True Benefit for the Patient

ABSTRACT Objectives Redo mitral valve surgery via sternotomy is associated with a substantial morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated a minimally invasive technique for mitral valve redo procedures. Material and Methods: Out of a series of 394 patients undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement via a right minithoracotomy, 39 patients underwent redo mitral valve surgery (59 ± 13 years, 23 female). Previous cardiac surgeries included 17 patients with mitral valve repair, 6 patients with mitral valve replacement, 3 patients with aortic valve replacement, 2 patients with atrial septal defect closure, and 11 patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In all cases, femoro-femoral cannulation was performed. The port access technique was applied in patients undergoing redo valve surgery. In patients with prior CABG, the operation was performed using deep hypothermia and ventricular fibrillation. Results: In all cases, sternotomy was avoided. The mitral valve was replaced in 20 patients and repaired in 19. Time of surgery and cross-clamp time were comparable with the overall series (168 ± 73 [redo] vs 168 ± 58 min and 52 ± 21 [redo] vs 58 ± 25 min). Mortality was 5.1%. One patient had transient hemiplegia due to the migration of the endoclamp. All other patients had uneventful outcomes and normal mitral valve function at 3-month's follow-up. Conclusion: Redo mitral valve surgery can be performed safely using a minimally invasive approach in patients with a previous sternotomy. The right lateral minithoracotomy offers excellent exposure. It minimizes the need for cardiac dissection, and thus, the risk for injury. Avoiding a resternotomy increases patient comfort of redo mitral valve surgery.     

Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve surgery: a true benefit for the patient

OBJECTIVES: Redo mitral valve surgery via sternotomy is associated with a substantial morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated a minimally invasive technique for mitral valve redo procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Out of a series of 394 patients undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement via a right minithoracotomy, 39 patients underwent redo mitral valve surgery (59+/-13 years, 23 female). Previous cardiac surgeries included 17 patients with mitral valve repair, 6 patients with mitral valve replacement, 3 patients with aortic valve replacement, 2 patients with atrial septal defect closure, and 11 patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In all cases, femoro-femoral cannulation was performed. The port access technique was applied in patients undergoing redo valve surgery. In patients with prior CABG, the operation was performed using deep hypothermia and ventricular fibrillation. RESULTS: In all cases, sternotomy was avoided. The mitral valve was replaced in 20 patients and repaired in 19. Time of surgery and cross-clamp time were comparable with the overall series (168+/-73 [redo] vs 168+/-58 min and 52+/-21 [redo] vs 58+/-25 min). Mortality was 5.1%. One patient had transient hemiplegia due to the migration of the endoclamp. All other patients had uneventful outcomes and normal mitral valve function at 3-month's follow-up. CONCLUSION: Redo mitral valve surgery can be performed safely using a minimally invasive approach in patients with a previous sternotomy. The right lateral minithoracotomy offers excellent exposure. It minimizes the need for cardiac dissection, and thus, the risk for injury. Avoiding a resternotomy increases patient comfort of redo mitral valve surgery.     

Reoperations for valve surgery: perioperative mortality and determinants of risk for 1,000 patients, 1958-1984

One thousand consecutive cardiac reoperations for valve surgery in 897 patients were reviewed to determine in-hospital mortality and indicators of risk. Subgroups based on the number of previous cardiac procedures and the valve or valves replaced or repaired at reoperation (aortic valve, mitral valve, tricuspid valve, or multiple valves and mortality [deaths/number of procedures (% mortality)]) for those subgroups are as follows: (Table: see text) Predictors of increased risk for a first aortic valve reoperation were advanced age (p = .0002), endocarditis (p = .0018), female sex (p = .014), impaired left ventricular function (p = .039), and number of coronary vessels obstructed by 70% or more (p = .055). For a first mitral valve reoperation, the predictors were advanced age (p less than .0001), preoperative shock or cardiac arrest (p = .01), previous aortic or tricuspid valve operations (p = .02), type of mitral valve procedure (risk for repair of periprosthetic leak was greater than mitral valve replacement which was greater than mitral valve-conserving operation [p = .05]), and impaired left ventricular function (p = .059). For a first multiple valve reoperation, the predictors were diabetes (p = .04) and ascites (p = .02), whereas patients undergoing mitral valve replacement and tricuspid valve operations were at decreased risk (p = .01). Comparison of second reoperations with first reoperations indicates risk increases for multiple operations (p = .01) but not for aortic or mitral valve procedures. Rereplacement of a prosthesis (p = .007), coronary bypass grafting at reoperation (p = .006), and advanced age (p = .06) increased the risk for second reoperations. Age is the most consistent predictor of risk for patients undergoing valve reoperations.     

Initial report of the Veterans Administration Preoperative Risk Assessment Study for Cardiac Surgery

This study was authorized by the Department of Veterans Affairs to improve the quality assurance of cardiac surgery by assessing preoperative risk factors and relating them to operative mortality. Data were received on 10,480 patients over a 2-year period. Preoperative risk variables were subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Significant variables for coronary artery bypass grafting after logistic regression analysis in order of importance are previous cardiac operation, priority of operation, New York Heart Association functional class, peripheral vascular disease, age, pulmonary rales, current diuretic use, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. For patients undergoing valve or other cardiac operations with or without coronary artery bypass grafting, those variables found to be significant after multivariate logistic regression analysis are priority of operation; age; peripheral vascular disease; great vessel repair; all other except aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement, and great vessel repair; mitral valve replacement; and cardiomegaly. By identifying these current risk factors and the coefficients from the multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis, expected mortality can be calculated. We propose that the ratio of observed to expected mortality is a better measure of quality of care than unadjusted mortality.     

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 6-year experience with 714 patients

BACKGROUND: This study analyzes a single institutional experience with minimally invasive mitral valve operations of 6 years, reviewing short-term morbidity and mortality and long-term echocardiographic follow-up data. METHODS: Seven hundred fourteen consecutive patients had minimally invasive mitral valve procedures between November 1995 and November 2001; concomitant procedures included 91 multiple valves and 18 coronary artery bypass grafts. Of these 714 patients, 561 patients had isolated mitral valve operations (375 repairs, 186 replacements). Mean age was 58.3 years (range, 14 to 96 years; 30.1% > 70 years), and 15.4% of patients had previous cardiac operations. Arterial cannulation was femoral in 79.0% and central in 21%, with the port access balloon endo-occlusion used in 82.3%. Cardioplegia was transjugular retrograde (54.1%) or antegrade (29.4%). Right anterior minithoracotomy was used in 96.6% and left posterior minithoracotomy in 2.2%. RESULTS: Hospital mortality for primary isolated mitral valve repair was 1.1% and 5.8% for isolated mitral valve replacement. Overall hospital mortality was 4.2% (30 of 714). Mean cross-clamp time was 92 minutes and mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 127 minutes. Postoperatively, median ventilation time was 11 hours, intensive care unit time was 19 hours, and total hospital stay was 6 days. Complications for all patients included permanent neurologic deficit (2.9%), aortic dissection (0.3%); there was no mediastinal infection (0.0%). Follow-up echocardiography demonstrated 89.1% of the repair patients had only trace or no residual mitral insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the minimally invasive port access approach to mitral valve operations is reproducible with low perioperative morbidity and mortality and with late outcomes that are equivalent to conventional operations.     

Current determinants of operative mortality in 1400 patients requiring aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND: Determinants of operative mortality after aortic valve replacement vary with a changing patient population due to advances in operative management and increasing life expectancy. In order to predict current groups of high risk patients, a statistically valid large study population base recruited over a short period of time is required. METHODS: Between January 1996 and June 2001, 1408 aortic valves were replaced in 1400 patients (572 of them with simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting). The data were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the operative risk. Mean age of the study population was 68 +/- 11 years (range 19 to 90 years old, 44% female). RESULTS: Overall operative mortality (within 30 days) was 3.8%. Independent predictive factors for operative mortality were previous bypass surgery, emergency operation, simultaneous mitral valve replacement, renal dysfunction, more than 80 years old, simultaneous bypass surgery in female patients with a body mass index greater than 29 kg/m(2), and height smaller than 1.57 m for patients more than 71 years old. Simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting in general (p = 0.6), previous aortic valve replacement (p = 0.59), and implantation of stented bioprostheses (p = 0.39) or stentless bioprostheses (p = 0.7) were not identified as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Certain groups of patients with a high operative risk were identified: patients more than 80 years old, women with a body mass index greater 29 kg/m(2) undergoing simultaneous coronary artery bypass surgery, and "small" patients more than 71 years old.     

Simultaneous cardiac operations with pulmonary resection for lung carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: A procedure remains to be established for managing patients with both cardiac and pulmonary diseases requiring surgical interventions. We review our experience with 6 patients having cardiac disease and lung cancer surgically treated simultaneously to determine whether simultaneous surgery is safe and effective. METHODS: Subjects were 6 men with a mean age of 64 +/- 10 years undergoing cardiac surgery combined with pulmonary lobectomy from January 1986 through June 2000. Cardiac procedures consisted of coronary artery bypass in 3, coronary artery bypass plus left ventricular aneurysm repair, aortic valve replacement, and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery in 1 patient each. All underwent lobectomy. RESULTS: No early deaths occurred. Bleeding complications occurred in 2 patients and lymph node dissection was incomplete in 3. Two died of carcinoma-related events, 1 at 28 and the other at 84 months after surgery. One died suddenly from a cardiac-related event 42 months after surgery. Only 1 patient is currently alive and disease-free at 104 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous surgery can be conducted with acceptable mortality. The occurrence of bleeding complications and incomplete lymph node dissection, however, indicates combined procedures only in patients requiring simultaneous surgery due to their disease or unable to tolerate a second operation.     

Minimally invasive approaches to aortic valve surgery: Brigham experience

Aortic valve surgery is a proven and effective therapy for severe aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Conventional aortic valve surgery is performed with a full sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, and replacement of the diseased aortic valve. Unlike minimally invasive (or "off-pump") coronary artery bypass, minimally invasive aortic valve surgery still requires cardiopulmonary bypass but refers primarily to smaller incisions and access. Minimally invasive approaches to aortic valve surgery have evolved over the past decade and have become the standard in institutions that perform large-volume minimally invasive cardiac surgery. The upper hemisternotomy has become our standard approach to isolated aortic valve surgery. It is a safe and effective technique with a similar morbidity and mortality to conventional aortic valve surgery. Patients derive clear benefits from this minimally invasive approach including less pain, shorter length of hospital stay, and faster return to preoperative function levels.     

Partial sternotomy ("C" incision) as standard access for full range of adult cardiac operations.

OBJECTIVE: In our institute, partial sternotomy has been adopted for standard access in the full range of adult cardiac operations, including coronary artery bypass grafting. In this study, our clinical experience is reviewed. METHODS: Since April 1998, of 100 cardiac surgical patients, 64 underwent partial sternotomy, while 36 patients had the traditional full sternotomy because of high surgical risk factors or anatomical reasons. Most of the patients having minimal access had a "C" incision, that is, a left lower partial sternotomy. RESULTS: The procedures performed with the "C" incision were coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, aortic root replacement, closure of atrial septal defect, and so on. There were two hospital deaths after partial sternotomy. Compared with full sternotomy patients, partial sternotomy patients had a shorter hospital stay, while their bypass times were longer. Their skin incisions were 11.7 cm on average. CONCLUSION: The "C" incision can provide satisfying results and can serve as the standard approach in the full range of cardiac operations.     

Successful combined minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and transapical aortic valve implantation

Transapical aortic valve implantation is indicated in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis and peripheral vascular disease requiring aortic valve replacement. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting is also a valid, minimally invasive option for myocardial revascularization in patients with critical stenosis on the anterior descending coronary artery. Both procedures are performed through a left minithoracotomy, without cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping, and cardioplegic arrest. We describe a successful combined transapical aortic valve implantation and minimally invasive direct coronary bypass in a high-risk patient with left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and severe aortic valve stenosis.     

Coronary artery disease in aortic surgery

The incidence of coronary artery disease in patients coming to aortic surgery and the impact of aggressive preoperative cardiac catheterization and myocardial revascularization was prospectively analyzed in 59 patients. Seventy-five percent of patients had at least one-vessel involvement, and 32% had three-vessel or left main involvement. Patients with electrocardiographic evidence of coronary artery disease had at least one-vessel involvement 84% of the time and three-vessel, left main involvement 36% of the time. Sixty-four percent of patients with no preoperative indications of coronary artery disease had at least one-vessel involvement and 29% had three-vessel, left main involvement. Resting (39 patients) and exercise multiple-gated acquisition scans (22 patients) did not predict the presence of coronary artery disease in patients without a history or electrocardiographic evidence of coronary artery disease. Myocardial revascularization was performed prior to aortic surgery in 17 patients (29%). The operative mortality was 3.7% with two patients dying from noncardiac-related complications. There were two additional deaths prior to aortic surgery with one patient dying during coronary artery bypass grafting, and one dying of aneurysm rupture prior to repair, making the overall mortality associated with this approach 7.4%. Preoperative cardiac catheterization and an aggressive approach toward coronary artery bypass grafting reduces the risk of cardiac complications in aortic surgery.     

Risk of Reoperative Valve Replacement for Failed Mitral and Aortic Bioprostheses

Background. One factor influencing the choice of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves is reoperation for bioprosthetic valve failure. To define its operative risk, we reviewed our results with valve reoperation for bioprosthetic valve failure.

Methods. Records of 400 consecutive patients having reoperative mitral, aortic, or mitral and aortic bioprosthetic valve replacement from January 1985 to March 1997 were reviewed.

Results. Reoperations were for failed bioprosthetic mitral valves in 219 patients, failed aortic valves in 153 patients, and failed aortic and mitral valves in 28 patients. Including 26 operations (6%) for acute endocarditis, 153 operations (38%) were nonelective. One hundred nine patients (27%) had other valves repaired or replaced, and 72 (18%) had coronary bypass grafting. The incidence of death in the mitral, aortic, and double-valve groups was respectively, 15 (6.8%), 12 (7.8%), and 4 (14.3%); and the incidence of prolonged postoperative hospital stay (>14 days) was, respectively, 57 (26.0%), 41 (26.8%), and 8 (28.6%). Only 7 of 147 patients (4.8%) having elective, isolated, first-time valve reoperation died. Multivariable predictors (p < 0.05) of hospital death were age greater than 65 years, male sex, renal insufficiency, and nonelective operation; and predictors of prolonged stay were acute endocarditis, renal insufficiency, any concurrent cardiac operation, and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure.

Conclusions. Reoperative bioprosthetic valve replacement can be performed with acceptable mortality and hospital stay. The best results are achieved with elective valve replacement, without concurrent cardiac procedures.     

Aortic valve replacement and aorta-coronary bypass surgery. Results with perfusion of proximal and distal coronary arteries.

The results in 80 patients undergoing simultaneous aortic valve replacement and aorta-coronary saphenous vein bypass grafting were analyzed to assess the effect of operative technique. The over-all operative mortality rate of 6.3% (five of 80) did not differ significantly from our results with aortic valve replacement alone. All patients who had isolated aortic valve replacement were operated upon with moderate hypothermia. The combined operation was performed in two ways. Thirty-one patients had aortic valve replacement prior to bypass grafting with intermittent coronary ostila perfusion. There were two deaths (6.5%), and five myocardial infarctions (16.1%) were diagnosed by standard electrocardiographic and enzyme criteria. More recently, 49 patients have undergone bypass grafting prior to aortic valve replacement. The proximal ends of the grafts were either anastomosed high on the aortic root or else individually cannulated to provide continuous distal perfusion during subsequent aortic valve replacement, with continuous coronary ostial perfusion. There were three operative deaths (6.1%) and one myocardial infarction (2.0%). The risk of combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass need be no greater than the risk of aortic valve replacement alone. Our experience suggests that myocardial perfusion distal to significant coronary artery stenoses reduces the risk of myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery disease requiring aortic valve replacement.     

Surgical radiofrequency ablation of both atria for atrial fibrillation: results of a multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: The Cox maze procedure has shown to be effective in treating atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation, with a similar objective, has been used as an adjunct to conventional cardiac surgery for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in more than 20 centers in Australia and New Zealand since March 2000. This is a report of those results. METHODS: One hundred thirty-two patients in 20 centers underwent radiofrequency ablation as an adjunct to conventional cardiac surgery, with a standardized lesion set created with a flexible, 7-electrode, temperature-controlled probe (Cobra; EPTechnologies, San Jose, Calif). All data were entered into a central registry, with regular follow-up prompted by the registry cocoordinator. Each radiofrequency scar was made with standard parameters requiring 2 minutes of tissue coagulation at 80 degrees C to 85 degrees C. Patients undergoing mitral procedures had radiofrequency ablation performed in the left atrium endocardially. Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement or coronary artery bypass surgery underwent epicardial radiofrequency ablation of the left atrium. Epicardial radiofrequency ablation lesions on the right atrium were common to both groups of patients. Preoperatively, 75% of the patients had chronic atrial fibrillation, 21% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and 4% had flutter. Surgical procedures performed included mitral valve procedure in 60%, coronary artery bypass grafting in 14%, aortic valve replacement in 7%, and coronary artery bypass grafting plus aortic valve replacement in 4%. RESULTS: There were no major complications related to the use of radiofrequency ablation. There were no soft tissue or cardiac perforations. Ten patients were defibrillated into sinus rhythm within 3 months postoperatively. The freedom from atrial fibrillation was 84% at 3 months, 90% at 6 months, and 100% at 12 months. All patients at 12 and 18 months' follow-up were in sinus rhythm. There were no thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical radiofrequency ablation can be performed safely as an adjunct to conventional cardiac surgery. A standardized lesion set created by using similar temperature settings can be adopted in multiple centers and might be effective in treating atrial fibrillation. Data collection through a central registry has helped in monitoring the effectiveness of this new technique in a scattered population.     

Mitral valve repair in redo cardiac surgery

An increasing number of patients are being referred for mitral valve repair in the redo cardiac surgery setting. The most common clinical scenarios involve prior coronary bypass surgery or aortic valve replacement, each presenting special challenges in terms of gaining valve exposure to enable repair while limiting dissection as much as possible. A right anterior thoracotomy approach is preferred in most patients, coupled with hypothermic fibrillatory arrest. A repeat sternotomy may be favored in select circumstances such as when there is a need for bypass grafting or moderate aortic insufficiency is present. Special attention to cannulation techniques, perfusion conditions, valve exposure, and de-airing maneuvers are all important to ensure good clinical results. Using a tailored approach we have performed mitral valve repair in 22 patients with a patent left internal mammary artery graft following coronary artery bypass grafting between July 1992 and February 2000 with acceptable morbidity and low mortality.     

Development and clinical application of minimally invasive cardiac surgery using percutaneous cardiopulmonary support.

OBJECTIVES: Optimal cardiopulmonary support during minimally invasive cardiac surgery remains controversial. We developed cardiopulmonary bypass for minimally invasive cardiac surgery using percutaneous peripheral cannulation. METHODS: Subjects were 34 patients (age: 58 +/- 13 years; range: 17-73) undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery using percutaneous cardiopulmonary support between June 1997 and March 1999. Procedures included atrial septal defect closure (n = 14), partial atrioventricular septal defect closure (n = 1), mitral valve replacement (n = 8), mitral valve repair (n = 3), aortic valve replacement (n = 6), coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 1), and right atrial myxoma extirpation (n = 1). Bicaval venous drainage from the right internal jugular vein and the femoral vein and arterial return to the femoral artery were instituted by percutaneous cannulation. Venous drainage was implemented by negative pressure (-20 to -40 mmHg) and arterial return was by conventional roller pump. All procedures were conducted through a skin incision 8 +/- 1 cm, from 6 to 10 cm and partial sternotomy. Aortic cross clamping and cardioplegic solution were administered in the surgical field. RESULTS: The operation lasted 224 +/- 45 min., cardiopulmonary bypass 104 +/- 32 min., and aortic clamping 77 +/- 23 min.. No deaths occurred. One patient with residual atrial septal defect required reoperation through the same skin incision. Only 1 patient required homologous blood transfusion. The average postoperative hospital stay was 15 +/- 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery using percutaneous cardiopulmonary support is safe and an excellent option for selected patients affected by single valve lesion, simple cardiac anomalies, and coronary artery bypass grafting.     

Mitral Valve Repair in Redo Cardiac Surgery

ABSTRACT An increasing number of patients are being referred for mitral valve repair in the redo cardiac surgery setting. The most common clinical scenarios involve prior coronary bypass surgery or aortic valve replacement, each presenting special challenges in terms of gaining valve exposure to enable repair while limiting dissection as much as possible. A right anterior thoracotomy approach is preferred in most patients, coupled with hypothermic fibrillatory arrest. A repeat sternotomy may be favored in select circumstances such as when there is a need for bypass grafting or moderate aortic insufficiency is present. Special attention to cannulation techniques, perfusion conditions, valve exposure, and de-airing maneuvers are all important to ensure good clinical results. Using a tailored approach we have performed mitral valve repair in 22 patients with a patent left internal mammary artery graft following coronary artery bypass grafting between July 1992 and February 2000 with acceptable morbidity and low mortality.     

Surgical treatment of giant coronary artery aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: Giant coronary artery aneurysm is an extremely uncommon disease. Most previous reports have involved only single cases. This report describes 6 patients with giant coronary artery aneurysm, examines its causes, and aims to establish the optimal surgical strategies for this exceptional and rare pathology. METHODS: From July 1996 to October 2004, a total of 30,268 patients underwent heart surgery at Fuwai Hospital in Beijing. Among these, 6 patients had giant coronary artery aneurysm diagnosed and underwent operation. Various surgical strategies were used for the operations of these 6 patients, such as coronary artery aneurysm resection, coronary artery reconstruction, and concomitant coronary bypass. Additional procedures, such as fistula closure, aortic valve replacement, aortoplasty, and embolectomy, were done at same time for the patients with complications of coronary fistula, aortic valve insufficiency, or thrombus. Patients were followed up from 8 to 87 months, with a mean of 48 months. Doppler echocardiography, ultrafast computed tomography, and 3-dimensional aerial image studies were performed during follow-up. RESULTS: Five of these six cases were found combined with coronary artery fistula, and the cause for these giant coronary artery aneurysms was congenital. The remaining case was caused by atherosclerosis. After surgery, all patients recovered uneventfully, without in-hospital mortality. None died during the follow-up, nor did any have recurrence of the symptoms or giant coronary artery aneurysm. CONCLUSION: Giant coronary artery aneurysm is a rare entity that is commonly caused by congenital malformation and combined with other cardiac anomalies. An optimal surgical operation should be based on the specific cardiac anomaly of the individual patient.     

Incidence and prognosis of abdominal complications after cardiopulmonary bypass.

The incidence of abdominal complications after cardiopulmonary bypass is low but associated with a high mortality. From January 1991 to October 1996, 4288 patients, of a mean age of 62.5 years, underwent open-heart surgery. Fifty-nine (1 of 4) of these patients developed early abdominal complications. These included 36% with a paralytic ileus, 21% with erosive gastritis, 18% with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, 12% with intestinal ischaemia, 5% with pseudo-obstruction of the colon, 6% with acute cholecystitis and 2% with acute pancreatitis. After coronary artery bypass grafting mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 94.4 min. There were abdominal complications in 1.0% and one hospital death. After valve surgery and combined surgery the mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 129 min. There were abdominal complications in 2.4% (alpha = 0.01) and seven deaths. Fourteen patients (24%) underwent abdominal operations: three had caecostomies for pseudo-obstruction of the colon, seven had a hemicolectomy, two had a cholecystectomy and two had resection of the ventricle. The hospital mortality rate was 13.5%. Abdominal complications were significantly more frequent after valve or combined operations of the coronaries and valves in comparison with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiac operations with extended cardiovascular bypass time were more likely to produce abdominal complications.     

Port-Access cardiac surgery using endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass: theory, practice, and results

BACKGROUND: Reduction of surgical trauma is the aim of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. This can be achieved by reducing the size of the incision or by eliminating or changing the cardiopulmonary bypass system. However, certain cardiac surgical procedures, such as valvular surgery and complex multivessel coronary artery surgery, are not feasible without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Therefore endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass may allow reduction of surgical trauma for these patients. METHODS: Since its first application in April 1995, more than 1100 procedures have been performed worldwide using the EndoCPB endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass system. The authors' experience consists of 60 Port-Access coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 34 Port-Access mitral valve procedures (18 replacements, 16 repairs), 5 atrial septal defect closures, and 3 atrial myxoma removals. RESULTS: The patient survival rate was 99%, the incidence of perioperative stroke was 1%, and the incidence of aortic dissection was 1%. In the Port-Access mitral valve and atrial septal defect patients, the survival rate was 100% with no peri- or postoperative complications. Peri- and postoperative transesophageal echocardiography revealed no perivalvular leak or remaining mitral insufficiency after valve repair. CONCLUSIONS: The EndoCPB endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass system allows the application of true Port-Access minimally invasive cardiac surgery in procedures that require the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest. Sternotomy and its potential complications can be avoided, and the surgical procedures can be performed safely on an empty, arrested heart with adequate myocardial protection.