Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate local staging accuracy for prostate cancer at 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by comparing with that at 1.5-T MRI. METHODS: Two groups, each consisting of 54 patients, were included by matching for age, prostate specific antigen, and Gleason score. Before radical prostatectomy, 1 group underwent 3.0-T MRI using a phased-array coil, and the other 1.5-T MRI using an endorectal coil. T2-weighted MR images at 3.0 and 1.5 T were analyzed in consensus by 2 radiologists, and their staging accuracy was compared with histology. Artifact and overall image quality were compared at both 3.0 and 1.5 T. RESULTS: Accuracy for T3 stage at 3.0 and 1.5 T were 72% (39/54) and 70% (38/54), respectively (P > 0.05). The 3.0-T MRI had a lower incidence of MR artifacts than the 1.5-T MRI (P < 0.05). However, overall imaging quality at both 3.0 and 1.5 T had no significant difference (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 3.0-T phased-array MRI is equivalent to the 1.5-T endorectal MRI in evaluating local staging accuracy for prostate cancer without significant loss of imaging quality.     

MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To qualitatively compare the image quality of torso phased-array 3-Tesla (3T) imaging of the prostate with that of endorectal 1.5-Tesla imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty cases of torso phased-array prostate imaging performed at 3-Tesla with FSE T2 weighted images were evaluated by two readers independently for visualization of the posterior border (PB), seminal vesicles (SV), neurovascular bundles (NVB), and image quality rating (IQR). Studies were performed at large fields of view(FOV) (25 cm) (14 cases) (3TL) and smaller FOV (14 cm) (19 cases) (3TS). A comparison was made to 20 consecutive cases of 1.5-T endorectal evaluation performed during the same time period.Results. 3TL produced a significantly better image quality compared with the small FOV for PB (P = .0001), SV (P =.0001), and IQR (P = .0001). There was a marginally significant difference within the NVB category (P = .0535). 3TL produced an image of similar quality to image quality at 1.5 T for PB (P = .3893), SV (P = .8680), NB (P = .2684), and IQR (P = .8599). CONCLUSION: Prostate image quality at 3T with a torso phased-array coil can be comparable with that of endorectal 1.5-T imaging. These findings suggest that additional options are now available for magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate gland.     

Prostate cancer evaluated with ferumoxtran-10-enhanced T2*-weighted MR Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: early experience

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the feasibility of ferumoxtran-10-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at high magnetic field strength (3.0 T) and to compare image quality between 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging in terms of lymph node detection in patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was institutional review board approved, and all patients gave written informed consent. Forty-eight consecutive patients aged 51-79 years (mean, 65.5 years) with prostate cancer were enrolled. T2*-weighted 1.5- and 3.0-T MR images of the pelvis were acquired in a sagittal plane parallel to the psoas muscle 24 hours after ferumoxtran-10 administration. A pelvic and body phased-array coil was used and yielded an in-plane resolution of 0.56 x 0.56 x 3.00 mm at 1.5 T and 0.50 x 0.50 x 2.50 mm at 3.0 T. All images were evaluated by three readers for total image quality, lymph node border delineation, muscle-fat contrast, and vessel-fat contrast. Statistical significance was calculated by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Subsequently, the general linear mixed model was used to estimate the contributions of three factors-patient, reader, and technique-to the variability of the imaging results. RESULTS: Significantly (P < .05) better muscle-fat contrast, vessel-fat contrast, lymph node border delineation, and total image quality were observed at 3.0-T MR imaging. The general linear mixed model revealed that the variability of all results could be attributed to the use of 3.0-T imaging. CONCLUSION: Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MR imaging can be performed at high magnetic field strengths and result in improved image quality, which may lead to improved detection of small positive lymph nodes.     

Comparative evaluation between external phased array coil at 3 T and endorectal coil at 1.5 T: preliminary results

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the image quality and the diagnostic accuracy of endorectal coil 1.5 T MRI (erMRI) and phased-array coil 3 T MRI (3-T MRI) in the pretherapeutic staging of prostate cancer. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients, with pathological proven prostate cancer, have been examined in the same week with both erMRI and 3-T MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated the image quality focusing on the following points: cancer tissue conspicuity, capsular infiltration and tumor involvement of seminal vesicles, neuro-vascular bundles, and apex. The radiologists assigned to each one of the above findings an image-quality score ranging from 1 to 5 (with 1 meaning "not visible," 2 "poorly visible," 3 "fairly visible," 4 "well visible with some artifacts," and 5 "clearly visible without artifacts".) Afterwards a comparative evaluation of the mean score obtained respectively by erMRI and 3 T MRI was done. Twenty-two of these 29 patients underwent radical prostatectomy. Assuming as gold standard the pathological report from the resected specimen, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of 3TMRI and erMRI in differentiating between tumors confined within the prostate gland (stage相似文献   

Update of prostate magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T

More recently, 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner become more clinically available, and clinical application of 3-T MR imaging (MRI) of the abdomen and pelvis is now feasible and being performed at many institutions. However, few prostrate 3-T MRI studies have been published. The increase in signal-to-noise ratio at 3 versus 1.5 T clearly improves spatiotemporal and spectral resolutions of the prostate. Thus, we asked whether 3-T MRI improves the localization and staging of prostate cancer versus 1.5-T MRI. To answer this question, this article reviews the current limitations of prostate 1.5-T MRI and addresses its pros and cons. Moreover, we present preliminary results of prostate 3-T MRI and introduce our experience for prostate 3-T MRI using a phased-array coil, with an emphasis on imaging sequences, for example, T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced, diffusion-weighted, and MR spectroscopic imaging.     

3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils; Initial experience(1)

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5T has gained acceptance for pretherapeutic staging of prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential clinical utility of combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils at 3T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six volunteers were examined on 1.5T and 3T scanners with pelvic phased-array surface coil combined with a disposable endorectal prostate coil. RESULTS: We were able to acquire T2-W fast spin echo images with 1.5 mm slices, field of view 12, matrix 320 x 192, (voxel size 0.35 mm(3)), with excellent anatomic detail and good T2 contrast. A 1.5 mm axial slice thickness permitted high-quality multiplanar reconstructions with clear visualization of small patho-anatomic structures. Dynamic contrast-enhanced gradient echo images showed excellent spatial resolution (voxel size, 0.38 mm(3)) and temporal resolution. With this level of anatomic information in dynamic images we could clearly distinguish between intracapsular and extracapsular contrast enhancement. CONCLUSION: Using modified T2-fast spin echo and dynamic contrast-enhanced gradient echo sequences, we obtained whole gland coverage with 35-38 microm(3) resolution, without interfering artifacts, in reasonable acquisition times and staying well below the specific absorption rate guidelines. The high spatial resolution in the axial plane allowed meaningful multiplanar reconstructions. The initial results show the clinical utility of endorectal 3T for the noninvasive evaluation of the prostate with image features and quality not achievable at 1.5 T.     

Combined morphological, [1H]-MR spectroscopic and contrast-enhanced imaging of human prostate cancer with a 3-Tesla scanner: preliminary experience

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to explore the feasibility of combined morphological magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [(1)H]magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of human prostate cancer at 3 Tesla using a pelvic phased-array coil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI, MRSI and DCE-MRI with a 3-Tesla whole-body scanner were performed in 30 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. High-resolution T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) images were evaluated for visualisation of the peripheral zone, central gland, visibility of the cancer lesion, prostatic capsule delineation and overall image quality according to a five-point scale. Relative levels of the prostate metabolites citrate, choline and creatine were determined in cancer and in the normal peripheral zone (PZ) and central gland (CG). Spectra were also evaluated for the separation of the signal of citrate, choline and creatine and suppression of lipid and water signals. Time-intensity curves were obtained for prostatic cancer and healthy PZ and CG from DCE-MRI. Finally, time of arrival, time to peak, maximum enhancement and wash-in rate in cancer, normal PZ and CG were calculated. RESULTS: The high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 3 Tesla provided T2-weighted TSE images with excellent anatomical detail (in-plane voxel size of 0.22 x 0.22 mm) and good T2 contrast. The increased spectral resolution was sufficient to separate the choline and creatine resonances and allow delineation of the four peaks of citrate resonance. The (choline + creatine)/citrate ratio was elevated in cancer in comparison with PZ and CG (p<0.001). Dynamic contrast-enhanced images showed good temporal resolution. All parameters obtained from DCE-MRI showed a statistically significant (P<0.05) difference between cancer tissue and normal PZ and CG. Wash-in rate and (choline+creatine)/citrate ratio were significantly correlated (r=0.713, P=0.001) in PZ cancer, whereas the correlation was not significant (r=0.617, P=0.06) in CG and in PZ (r=0.530, P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to perform MRI of prostate cancer at 3 Tesla using a pelvic phased-array coil with high spatial, temporal and spectral resolution. The combination of vascular information from DCE-MRI and metabolic data from MRSI has excellent potential for improved accuracy in delineating and staging prostate carcinoma. These results suggest that high magnetic field strengths offer the possibility of studying prostate cancer without use of an endorectal coil.     

MR colonoscopy at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T in vivo and a colon model

PURPOSE: Retrospectively, magnetic resonance (MR) colonography images obtained from a colon model and in routine examinations of patients screened for polyps were compared in terms of whether, and to what degree, image quality improved at a higher field strength of 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight MR colonography images from 40 patients, of whom 20 had each been scanned at 1.5 and 3.0 T, respectively, using a four-element phased-array torso coil, were compared. At both field strengths, imaging included T1-weighted fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo (T1-fs-GE), T2/T1-weighted fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA), and T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo (T2-SSFSE), with breath-hold technique. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis performed by seven readers, the three types of images from the colon model and from 20 patients each at 1.5 and 3.0 T were compared. While a time window of 20 s was allowed for picture assessment in a chance-generated succession of images on a monitor, image quality was rated with a score of 1-5 (1=very good; 5=very bad). Statistical significance was calculated with Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: At both field strengths, T2-SSFSE images received the best ratings, followed by FIESTA images (P=.001). Although, overall, the 3.0-T images obtained scores worse than those of the 1.5-T images, a better detection of phantom polyps was noted in the colon model (P=.001). CONCLUSION: Although MR colonography with the breath-hold technique using the same four-element phased-array coil at 3.0 and 1.5 T does not perform better at a higher field strength in general, an improved detection of small polyps may be obtained.     

Initial experience of 3 tesla endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging and 1H-spectroscopic imaging of the prostate

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to explore the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate at 3T, with the knowledge of potential drawbacks of MRI at high field strengths. MATERIAL AND METHOD: MRI, dynamic MRI, and 1H-MR spectroscopic imaging were performed in 10 patients with prostate cancer on 1.5T and 3T whole-body scanners. Comparable scan protocols were used, and additional high-resolution measurements at 3T were acquired. For both field strengths the signal-to-noise ratio was calculated and image quality was assessed. RESULT: At 3T the signal-to-noise ratio improved. This resulted in increased spatial MRI resolution, which significantly improved anatomic detail. The increased spectral resolution improved the separation of individual resonances in MRSI. Contrast-enhanced time-concentration curves could be obtained with a doubled temporal resolution. CONCLUSIONS: Initial results of endorectal 3T 1H-MR spectroscopic imaging in prostate cancer patients showed potential advantages: the increase in spatial, temporal, and spectral resolution at higher field strength may result in an improved accuracy in delineating and staging prostate cancer.     

3-T MRI with phased-array coil in local staging of prostatic cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system with a phased-array coil (3T MRI) in the local staging of prostatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2004 and September 2007, 59 patients (mean age 66 years) with a histologic diagnosis of prostatic cancer underwent 3-T MRI with a phased-array coil. A total of 42/59 patients underwent a radical prostatectomy within 3 weeks of the MRI examination. Two radiologists with differing experience in the interpretation of prostatic imaging used a 1-5 scale score to assess extracapsular spread, seminal vesicle and neurovascular bundle infiltration, and prostatic apex involvement. The anatomopathologic examination conducted on histologic macrosections was the reference test used to evaluate the results of 3-T MRI. Interobserver reliability was assessed using the k value. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values obtained by the expert radiologist were 68%, 92%, and 83%, respectively, compared to 50%, 85%, and 71% for the identification of extracapsular spread and 81%, 62%, and 84% compared to 63%, 50%, and 55% for apex involvement. Interobserver reliability was good (k = 0.71). Seminal vesicle infiltration was correctly identified in four of five cases and neurovascular bundle infiltration was identified in four of four cases. CONCLUSIONS: Despite presenting diagnostic accuracy values lower than those reported in literature using 1.5-T endorectal coil MRI, the use of 3-T MRI with a phased-array coil could constitute a valid alternative to MRI techniques using endorectal coils in selected patients. Direct comparative studies between the two methods on large caseloads are required to confirm this hypothesis.     

Proton two-dimensional chemical shift imaging for evaluation of prostate cancer: external surface coil vs. endorectal surface coil

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic ability of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) using an external surface coil with that using an endorectal surface coil in patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging (MRI) and two-dimensional chemical shift imaging (2D CSI) were performed in 5 healthy volunteers and in 35 patients with prostate cancer. The receiver coil was the anterior lower part of a phased-array coil or an endorectal surface coil. RESULTS: Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnosing prostate cancer showed no significant difference (P = 0.784) between the area under the curve of phased-array coil CSI and that of endorectal surface coil CSI. CONCLUSION: The phased-array coil CSI could provide comparable detection accuracy to endorectal surface coil CSI. In patients with rectal diseases or patients who could not tolerate the discomfort with insertion of an endorectal surface coil, we recommend the phased-array coil CSI.     

Effect of using endorectal coil in preoperative staging of rectal carcinomas by pelvic MR imaging

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging with pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils prospectively, and evaluate if endorectal coil provides any additional information to high resolution pelvic MR imaging in rectal carcinoma staging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative MRI of 25 patients with rectal carcinoma was performed with pelvic phased-array coil alone, and with both phased-array coil and endorectal coil placed. Staging was made by evaluating images obtained by using both coils prospectively, and correlated with histopathologic staging. The images were then assessed separately, and compared to each other retrospectively. RESULTS: Two and 3 of the 5 histopathologically proved T1 tumors were staged correctly on MRI with pelvic phased-array coil alone and after the endorectal coil placement, respectively. Histopathologically identified five T2 tumors were staged correctly as T2 in 4 of the cases, 1 was understaged and 10 of 14 patients who had T3 tumor were staged as T3, 4 of them were understaged as T2 on both techniques. Specificity, sensitivity and accuracy rates for staging of T3 tumors were found as 71%, 100% and 84%, respectively, for each technique. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of N staging were both 88% on both techniques. CONCLUSION: Pelvic MR imaging after the placement of endorectal coil in addition to the phase-array coil was not superior to the imaging with phased-array coil alone in T staging of rectal carcinomas and the latter achieved better visualization of the lymph nodes by means of larger field of view.     

Local staging of rectal cancer using combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coil MRI

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of MRI, using a pelvic phased-array coil and an endorectal coil, for preoperative local staging of rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients (26 males and 25 females) with adenocarcinoma of the rectum underwent preoperative MRI and surgical resection of their tumors. Surgical pathology staging was compared to MRI staging (using the TNM classification) obtained both retrospectively by a reader blinded to surgical findings and prospectively (radiological reports). In addition, patients were stratified according to surgical treatment groups (stage I = T1-2/N0, stage II = T3/N0, stage III = Tx/N1-2). RESULTS: At pathology, 36 of 51 (68%) tumors were classified as T0-T2, and 15 (32%) were classified as T3. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI readings for T3 staging were 93% and 86%, respectively (positive predictive value (PPV) = 74%, negative predictive value (NPV) = 97%, accuracy = 88%). MRI correctly predicted lymph node metastases in 11 of 13 patients with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 69% (PPV = 58%, NPV = 90%, accuracy = 74%). MRI correctly predicted surgical treatment groups in 33 of 39 (85%) patients. Interobserver agreement between the retrospective and prospective readings was excellent (kappa = 0.85) for prediction of T3 tumor and good (kappa = 0.80) for prediction of nodal involvement. CONCLUSION: Combined endorectal and pelvic phased-array coil MRI can be used reliably to select which patients should receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy. It is highly predictive in terms of excluding T3 tumors, but still has limitations in predicting lymph node metastasis.     

Multiparametric MR imaging of the prostate at 1.5-T without endorectal coil using an 8 channel pelvic phased array: Is it still a viable option?

IntroductionThe purpose of our work was to evaluate the feasibility of prostate multiparametric MR imaging at 1.5-T without endorectal coil using an 8 channel pelvic phased array coil.Material and methodsA total of 154 patients who underwent mp-MRI were retrospectively included. Patients received a standardized mp-MRI, compliant with 2012 European Society of Uro-Radiology guidelines, with 1·5 T magnetic field strength and an 8 channel pelvic phased-array coil.Two blinded readers graded the image quality of mp-MRI on a three-point scale and they scored the prostate lesions according to PI-RADS v2. All PI-RADS of 4 or 5 underwent biopsy. A third radiologist and a pathologist verified the correspondence between the MRI images and the results of the biopsy.Results64 (41.6%) patients showed a Pi-rads of 4 or 5. At biopsy, 79.7% showed a Gleason score ≥7, 12.5% showed a Gleason score of 6 and 7.8% showed a negative biopsy. In the group of Pi-rads ≤ 3, 12 patients underwent a biopsy with the following results: negative biopsy in 33.3%, atypical Small Acinar Proliferation in 16.7%, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in 25% and indolent PCa 25%. Mp-MRI in the identification of clinically significant cancer provided a low percentage of false positive (7.8%) while in 79.7% of cases it was capable to detect clinically significant prostate cancer. In 92.2% of patients mp-MRI identified a prostate cancer with a Gleason score ≥6. The inter-reader agreement was excellent in defining both the quality of the examination and the PI-RADS category (k = 0.83 and k = 0.70, respectively).Conclusionsmp-MRI at 1.5-T without endorectal coil using an 8 channel phased array is an appropriate tool for early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.Implications for practice8 channel pelvic phased array is still an appropriate tool for early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer and for obtaining a reduction in overdiagnosis of indolent PCa.     

Local staging of prostate carcinoma with endorectal coil MRI: correlation with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens

The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of endorectal coil MRI in the local staging of prostate carcinoma. A total of 73 patients with biopsy-proven prostate carcinoma were examined at 0.5 T prior being submitted to radical prostatectomy. The gold standard was provided in all patients by findings at whole-mount sectioning of the surgical specimens. At pathology 28 patients had stage T2, 30 had stage T3a/b, and 15 had stage T3c lesions. Overall accuracy of endorectal coil MRI in defining local tumor stage was 82% (60 of 73 patients). Of 73 patients, 5 (7%) were underestimated and 8 (11%) overestimated. The sensitivity and the specificity of endorectal coil MRI in diagnosing capsular penetration were 95% and 82%, respectively. Seminal vesicle invasion was detected with 80% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Our data indicate that endorectal coil MRI is an accurate method for local staging of prostate cancer.Correspondence to: C. Bartolozzi     

Phased-array MRI of canine prostate using endorectal and endourethral coils.

A four-channel phased array consisting of one surface coil, two endorectal coils, and one flexible endourethral loop coil was designed for MRI of the canine prostate. The endorectal coils provide high signal in the posterior region of the prostate, while the endourethral and surface coils are sensitive to the central and anterior regions of the prostate. Gel phantom experiments indicate that the proposed phased-array configuration generates 15 times more signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than a combination of two surface coils and one endorectal coil within the posterior region of the prostate; the performance of the two configurations is comparable near the anterior prostate surface. Ultimate intrinsic SNR (UISNR) analysis was used to compare the proposed phased array's performance to the best possible SNR for external coils. This analysis showed that the proposed phased array outperforms the best-case external coil within the posterior and central regions of the prostate by up to 20 times. In canine experiments in vivo, high-resolution fast spin-echo (FSE) images of the prostate were obtained with a pixel size of 230 microm obtained in 3 min 12 s. The proposed phased-array design potentially can be used to increase the accuracy of prostate cancer staging and the feasibility of MR-guided prostate interventions.     

Three-dimensional breathhold SSFP coronary MRA: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of three-dimensional breathhold coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3.0T using the steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence, and quantify the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) gains of coronary MRA from 1.5T to 3.0T using whole-body and phased-array cardiac coils as the signal receiver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers were scanned on 1.5T and 3.0T whole-body systems using the SSFP sequence. Numerical simulations were performed for the SSFP sequence to optimize the flip angle and predict signal enhancement from 1.5T to 3.0T. Coronary artery images were acquired with the whole-body coil in transmit-receive mode or transmit-only with phased-array cardiac coil receivers. RESULTS: In vivo studies of the same volunteer group at both field strengths showed increases of 87% in SNR and 83% in CNR from 1.5T to 3.0T using a whole-body coil as the signal receiver. The corresponding increases using phased-array receivers were 53% in SNR and 92% in CNR. However, image quality at 3.0T was more variable than 1.5T, with increased susceptibility artifacts and local brightening as the result of increased B(0) and B(1) inhomogeneities. CONCLUSION: Coronary MRA at 3.0T using a three-dimensional breathhold SSFP sequence is feasible. Improved SNR at 3.0T warrants the use of coronary MRA with faster acquisition and/or improved spatial resolution. Further investigations are required to improve the consistency of image quality and signal uniformity at 3.0T.     

Eye imaging with a 3.0-T MRI using a surface coil – a study on volunteers and initial patients with uveal melanoma

MRI of uveal melanoma using 1.5-T technology and surface coils has developed into a standard procedure. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of 3.0-T technology in eye imaging. To optimize the MRI sequences for clinical eye imaging with 3.0-T, six healthy volunteers were conducted using a 4.0-cm surface coil. Evaluation criteria were the signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) and image quality. A further six patients with uveal melanoma were examined with 1.5- and 3.0-T under retrobulbar anesthesia. During 3.0-T examinations of volunteers, eye movements caused significant artifacts. On the contrary, excellent imaging quality was reached in examinations of patients under retrobulbar anesthesia at 3.0 T. Subjective assessment showed no significant difference between 1.5 and 3.0 T in patients. Due to the increased SNR, the 3.0-T technique has the potential to improve eye imaging, but the higher susceptibility to motion artifacts limits the clinical use of this technique to patients receiving retrobulbar anesthesia.     

Bilateral ce-MR angiography of the hands at 3.0 T and 1.5 T: intraindividual comparison of quantitative and qualitative image parameters in healthy volunteers

The purpose of this study was to determine the benefit of bilateral contrast-enhanced MR angiography (ce-MRA) of the hands at 3.0 Tesla (T) compared with an established 1.5-T technique in healthy volunteers. Intraindividual bilateral ce-MRA of the hands was performed at 1.5 T and 3.0 T in 14 healthy volunteers using a timed ultra-fast GRE sequence featuring parallel acquisition. The evaluation comprised measurement of the vessel signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), rating of the image quality and the assessment of artefacts and venous contamination. At 3.0 T, SNR improved up to 95% and CNR up to 129%. The image quality of the larger inflow arteries, the palm arches and common digital arteries was good or sufficient at either magnetic field strengths. However, 3.0-T MRA was clearly superior in the depiction of the digital arteries. Ce-MRA of the hand clearly profits from the use of 3.0 T. Compared with 1.5 T, a substantial increase of CNR is found resulting in a significantly better delineation of the small digital arteries. Saturation affects more the SNR of the perivascular tissue than the contrast-enhanced blood, and thus leads to a marked increase of CNR at 3.0.     

T2-weighted MR imaging of prostate cancer: multishot echo-planar imaging vs fast spin-echo imaging

The aim of the present study was to assess the performance of pre-biopsy T2-weighted MR imaging using multishot echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence for visualization of prostate cancer and to compare image quality with that of fast spin-echo (FSE) sequence. Thirty-nine patients with suspected prostate cancer and one healthy male volunteer were examined on a 1.5-T MR scanner equipped with a pelvic phased-array coil. Axial MR images were obtained using multishot EPI sequence with a multishot number of 16 and FSE sequence without fat suppression. Paired EPI and FSE images were independently evaluated by three radiologists. Furthermore, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared between EPI and FSE images of 12 pathologically proven lesions of prostate cancer. Delineation of the periprostatic venous plexus, prostate zonal anatomy, and seminal vesicle on EPI was graded to be superior/inferior to FSE in 15.8/0, 14.6/0, and 21.5/4.3% of cases, respectively. On the other hand, delineation of the neurovascular bundle was superior/inferior to FSE in 2.6/13.2% of cases. The SNR and CNR of prostate cancer on EPI were significantly higher than those on FSE (7.99±2.51 vs 3.36±0.58, p<0.0001, and 5.51±2.02 vs 2.21±0.79, p<0.0001, respectively). In conclusion, multishot EPI has higher quality of contrast resolution for imaging of prostate cancer compared with FSE and would have the potential usefulness in the detection of prostate cancer, although these results obtained with a phased-array coil cannot be extrapolated to examinations performed with an endorectal coil.