Reboxetine addition in patients with mirtazapine-resistant depression: a case series

OBJECTIVES: Treatment-resistant depression is a common occurrence in clinical practice as well as combination treatment with 2 different antidepressants. In the present case series, we study the effectiveness of the addition of reboxetine, during 12 weeks, to 14 outpatients diagnosed with major depressive disorder, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition, Text Revision) criteria, who had previously failed to respond or who had only responded partially, over a period of 6 weeks, to conventional treatment with mirtazapine. METHODS: Evaluation of antidepressant efficacy was carried out through the application of the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Global Improvement Scale (CGI-I). RESULTS: The percentages of responders (HDRS>or=50%), patients in remission (HDRS相似文献   

The effect of chronic antidepressant treatment on serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in depressed patients: a preliminary study

Recent studies suggested a role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in depression. While BDNF levels are lower in depressed patients, antidepressant treatment increases serum BDNF levels of depressed patients. Our study aims to test the effect of chronic venlafaxine treatment on serum BDNF levels in patients with a major depressive disorder. Ten patients diagnosed as major depressive disorder according to DSM-IV are included in the study. Two of the patients had their first episode and were drug-naive, the other eight patients were drug-free for at least 4 weeks. The severity of depression was assessed with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). The control group consisted of ten age- and sex-matched subjects without any psychiatric disorder. Blood samples were collected at the baseline and after 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment (during remission). At the baseline the mean serum BDNF level was 17.9+/-9.1 ng/ml and the mean HDRS score was 23.2+/-4.6. Serum BDNF levels of the study group were significantly lower than in the control group (31.6+/-8.6 ng/ml). At the end of the study, the mean serum BDNF level was 34.6+/-7.1 ng/ml whereas the mean HDRS score was 8.2+/-3.9. From the baseline to the remission after 12 weeks of treatment, the increase in serum BDNF level and the decrease in HDRS score were statistically significant, respectively. When we compared the serum BDNF level of depressed patients at remission to that of the controls, there was no statistically significant difference. This study shows that venlafaxine treatment of depression improves serum BDNF level which may be considered as a nonspecific peripheral marker of depression.     

Therapeutic effects of escitalopram and reboxetine in seasonal affective disorder: A pooled analysis

The monoaminergic neurotransmitters serotonin and noradrenaline have both been implicated in the pathogenesis of seasonal affective disorder (SAD). However, the differential therapeutic value of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (NARI) in SAD has not been assessed until now. This study compares data from two open-label trials with similar methodology investigating the SSRI escitalopram and the NARI reboxetine. 20 SAD patients were treated with escitalopram (10-20 mg) and 15 patients received treatment with reboxetine (fixed dosage: 8 mg) over 6 weeks. Ratings included the structured interview guide for the Hamilton depression rating scale, SAD version (SIGH-SAD), the clinical global impression of severity (CGI-S) and improvement (CGI-I) and the UKU side effect rating scale. Treatment led to a significant reduction in SIGH-SAD score, CGI-S and CGI-I after one week in the reboxetine group and after two weeks in the escitalopram group. SIGH-SAD score was significantly lower in the reboxetine group at weeks 1, 2 and 4 but not at the end of the study. The response rate (SIGH-SAD <50% of baseline value) and the remission rate (SIGH-SAD <8) were not significantly different after 6 weeks of treatment, but the time to response and to remission was significantly shorter in the reboxetine group. The number and severity of side effects were higher in patients treated with reboxetine at all time points. Thus escitalopram and reboxetine were equally effective in treating SAD on all primary and secondary outcome measures. Reboxetine displayed a faster onset of action, but was associated with more pronounced side effects. Further studies comparing SSRI and NARI in SAD are warranted.     

Mirtazapine for patients with alcohol dependence and comorbid depressive disorders: a multicentre, open label study

Major depressive disorder and alcohol dependence are common and serious mental illnesses. There is a great interest in discovering useful treatments for both mood symptoms and alcohol abuse in those patients with depressive disorders and comorbid alcohol dependence. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of mirtazapine for the treatment of patients with alcohol dependence comorbid with a depressive disorder in an open label, naturalistic multicentre treatment setting. The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale were measured at baseline and at weeks 4 and 8 for the assessment of treatment effectiveness. Alcohol craving was measured using the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) and the Visual Analog Scale for Craving (VAS). This study showed a statistically significant reduction of the scores on the HDRS (13.9+/-7.3, p<0.0001), HARS (10.8+/-7.2, p<0.0001) and the CGI-S (1.7+/-1.0, p<0.0001) from baseline to the endpoint (week 8). The OCDS and VAS scores were also decreased significantly by 42.3% and 53.2% (9.0+/-10.0, p<0.0001; 2.5+/-2.4, p<0.0001, respectively). The number of patients with a 50% reduction or more in the HDRS and HARS scores was 103 (72.0%) and 106 (74.1%) at the endpoint, respectively. Adverse events related to mirtazapine were observed in 10% or more of the patients in this study. In conclusion, the results from this naturalistic study suggest that the use of mirtazapine for the patients with alcohol dependence comorbid with depressive disorder is accompanied by clinical improvement in their mood and alcohol craving.     

Adjunctive topiramate in bipolar II disorder.

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive topiramate in bipolar II patients who were either treatment-resistant to or unable to tolerate lithium, carbamazepine or valproate. Nineteen DSM-IV bipolar II patients received increasing doses of open-label topiramate as adjunctive therapy for their hypomanic (n=15) or depressive (n=4) symptoms. Sixteen patients completed the 12-week follow-up. There were highly significant improvements in YMRS, HDRS and CGI-BP-M scores (p=0.0001). Of the fifteen hypomanic patients, eight (53%) were rated as responders to topiramate (50% reduction in YMRS scores), and five (33%) met criteria for remission (YMRS score pound 8). Two of the four patients with a depressive episode at study entry (50%) were rated as responders (50% reduction in HDRS score), and one (25%) achieved remission (HDRS score pound 6). Topiramate was generally well tolerated. One third of the patients experienced weight loss. These preliminary results suggest that adjunctive topiramate may be useful in treating bipolar II disorder.     

Reboxetine, a unique selective NRI, prevents relapse and recurrence in long-term treatment of major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: The long-term efficacy and tolerability of the antidepressant reboxetine, a unique selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (selective NRI), were assessed in an international study. METHOD: Two hundred eighty-three patients with recurrent DSM-III-R major depression who responded to 6 weeks of reboxetine treatment (> or =50% decrease in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] total score) were randomly assigned to receive reboxetine or placebo for 46 weeks in a double-blind phase. Relapse (> or =50% increase in HAM-D total score and/or a HAM-D total score > or =18) rate was the principal assessment criterion and included patients who experienced relapse or recurrence. Only patients who remained relapse-free at the end of the first 6-month treatment period were included in the relapse rate assessment at the end of the second 6-month treatment period. RESULTS: Reboxetine was associated with a markedly lower relapse rate than placebo (22% vs. 56%; p<.001) and a greater cumulative probability of a maintained response (p = .0001) during long-term treatment. Patients in remission (HAM-D total score < or =10) at the time of random assignment were less likely to relapse (16% reboxetine, 48% placebo; p<.001). The proportion of patients who were relapse-free and therefore remained in the study was significantly (p< or =.001) higher among those on reboxetine treatment than on placebo at the end of the first (61% vs. 40%) and second (88% vs. 59%) 6 months of treatment. Additional efficacy measures supported these findings. The incidence of adverse events with reboxetine was low and comparable with that for placebo. Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred infrequently. CONCLUSION: Reboxetine treatment over 1 year is more effective than placebo in the prevention of relapse in patients with recurrent depression. The low relapse rates at the end of the second 6 months of treatment further suggest that reboxetine effectively prevents recurrence of depressive symptoms following episode resolution. Reboxetine is well tolerated in long-term treatment of depression, a finding that bodes well for long-term patient compliance.     

Safety and efficacy of oral escitalopram as continuation treatment of intravenous citalopram in patients with major depressive disorder

The objective of this open-label, multicentre study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treatment with escitalopram (10 or 20 mg/day) for 6 weeks following a switch from intravenous citalopram treatment (20 or 40 mg/day) in patients presenting with a major depressive episode. A total of 173 patients were included, 147 (85%) of whom completed the study. The mean Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at inclusion (last citalopram dose) was 31.6 +/- 9.9. The MADRS score decreased to 23.4 +/- 10.5 after 3 days of oral treatment with escitalopram and was 12.7 +/- 9.3 at the end of the study. The scores on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Patient Global Evaluation scales also improved: at the end of the study, the response rates were 67% on the MADRS (defined as >or=50% decrease from MADRS baseline score) and 68% on the CGI-I (defined as CGI-I 相似文献   

Using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of depression

BACKGROUND: clinicians have long noticed a correlation between physiological markers of inflammation and depression. The best-known example is the activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and cortisol secretion; however more recent studies have demonstrated increased salivary prostaglandins and plasma acute phase proteins in depressed patients. To date four randomised controlled trials have used celecoxib or rofecoxib as adjuncts to serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of depression. These suggested a statistically significant decrease in depressive symptoms in the patients taking NSAIDs and SSRIs, compared to patients taking SSRIs alone. Interpretation of these results is limited by the small sample size and short duration of these preliminary studies. The research only considers depressed patients receiving treatment in secondary care; no study has examined the effectiveness of NSAIDs as an adjunct in primary care, even though most cases of depression in the UK are managed in the community by general practitioners. PROPOSAL: we propose a multi-centre double-blinded randomised controlled trial with two objectives: to determine whether citalopram plus celecoxib dual therapy achieves a greater reduction in depressive symptoms (quantified using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)) within four weeks, compared to citalopram monotherapy; and to determine whether citalopram plus celecoxib dual therapy is more likely to achieve remission (HDRS score ?7) of moderate to severe depression within six months, compared with citalopram monotherapy. The endpoints will be the reduction in HDRS score after 4 weeks of treatment, and the HDRS score after 26 weeks of treatment. The study will enrol 452 participants from general practices who have a moderate or severe, current or recurrent major depressive episode when medication with an SSRI is considered. The study population will be stratified according to age, sex, HDRS score, age of onset of first episode, number of previous depressive episodes and duration of current episode. The population will then be randomised into two groups. Subjects will be interviewed to determine HDRS score, measure blood pressure, count pills and discuss side-effects. This will occur weekly for the first four weeks, and every four weeks thereafter.     

Reboxetine,the first selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor antidepressant: Efficacy and tolerability in 2613 patients

INTRODUCTION: Reboxetine is the first available selective noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor (selective NRI). This paper gives an overview of its antidepressant efficacy and tolerability in eight randomized double-blind, multicentre clinical trials. The clinical profile of reboxetine is also compared with that of the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) desipramine and imipramine and the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine. METHODS: Pooled data were analysed from seven short-term (4 &#45 8 weeks) and one long-term (up to 1 year) trials comparing reboxetine with placebo, imipramine, desipramine or fluoxetine. The tolerability of reboxetine was evaluated in 2613 patients with major depression or dysthymia. Data from 1959 patients with major depressive disorder were included to assess drug efficacy. Efficacy was principally assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). RESULTS: Reboxetine was more effective than placebo in three of four short-term trials, and it was as effective as fluoxetine, imipramine and desipramine. In long-term treatment, reboxetine was more effective than placebo in preventing relapse ( &#83 50% increase in HAM-D) and recurrence (HAM-D total score &#104 10). In a subset of severely depressed patients, reboxetine was as effective as imipramine and significantly more effective than fluoxetine. Reboxetine was as effective as imipramine in the elderly, but better tolerated. The most common adverse events among the 1503 patients (adults and elderly) who received reboxetine were dry mouth (22%), constipation (15%), sweating (12%) and insomnia (11%). Overall, reboxetine was well tolerated, as well as the SSRI fluoxetine and better than the TCAs imipramine and desipramine. CONCLUSIONS: Reboxetine is effective and well tolerated in the short and long-term treatment of depression. It is as well tolerated as fluoxetine and better than imipramine and desipramine. ( Int J Psych Clin Pract 2000; 4: 201 - 208)     

The intensity dependence of auditory evoked ERP components predicts responsiveness to reboxetine treatment in major depression

INTRODUCTION: The intensity (loudness)-dependent amplitude change (IDAP) of auditory evoked event-related potential (ERP) components has been suggested as an indicator of central serotonergic neurotransmission. In patients with major depression, associations of high IDAP with favorable SSRI treatment outcome have been reported. This is the first study to assess the predictive value of the IDAP in SNRI treatment. METHODS: We evaluated the pre-treatment intensity-dependent change of auditory evoked P1, N1, P2, and P1/N1 and N1/P2 peak-to-peak amplitudes in 14 inpatients with major depressive episode (DSM IV) in the course of 24 days of treatment with the SNRI reboxetine (6-12 mg/d). RESULTS: Our data revealed a highly significant correlation between lower intensity-dependent N1 amplitude slopes prior to reboxetine treatment and stronger decrease of HDRS total score at Fz ( r = 0.86, P < 0.001), Fcz ( r = 0.91, P < 0.001), and Cz ( r = 0.93, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This result corroborates the hypothesis of the IDAP as a differential indicator of serotonergic versus noradrenergic antidepressant psychopharmacotherapy.     

Deep TMS in a resistant major depressive disorder: a brief report

Introduction: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has proven effective. Recently, a greater intracranial penetration coil has been developed. We tested the efficacy of the coil in the treatment of resistant major depression. Methods: Our sample included seven patients suffering from major depression who were treated using Brainsway's H1‐coil connected to a Magstim rapid 2 stimulator. Deep TMS treatment was given to each patient in five sessions per week over a period of 4 weeks. Patients were treated with 120% intensity of the motor threshold and a frequency of 20 HZ with a total of 1,680 pulses per session. Results: Five patients completed 20 sessions: one attained remission (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)=9); three patients reached a reduction of more than 50% in their pre‐treatment HDRS; and one patient achieved a partial response (i.e., the HDRS score dropped from 21 to 12). Average HDRS score dropped to 12.6 and average Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale score dropped to 9.Two patients dropped out: one due to insomnia and the second due to a lack of response. Discussion: Compared to the pooled response and remission rates when treating major depression with rTMS, deep TMS as used in this study is at least similarly effective. Still, a severe limitation of this study is its small sample size, which makes the comparison of the two methods in terms of their effectiveness or side effects impossible. Greater numbers of subjects should be studied to achieve this aim. Conclusions: An H1 deep TMS coil could be used as an alternative treatment for major depressive disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Blood-Serum Glutamate in Patients with Depressive Disorders as a Potential Peripheral Marker of the Prognosis of the Effectiveness of Therapy

Depressive disorder is considered as an important medico-social problem due to its severity, chronic nature, and high level of clinical polymorphism. The precise biological mechanism of this pathology is still unknown. The latest data confirms the role of the glutamatergic system in the pathogenesis of depression. Here, 79 patients with depressive disorders (50 diagnosed with a “single depressive episode” and 29 with “recurrent depressive disorder”) who were treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and 27 healthy control donors underwent complex clinical and biochemical examinations. The depression severity at the baseline and on the 14th and 28th days of treatment, as well as during remission, was evaluated using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). The therapy response was evaluated using the CGI-I scale. The blood serum glutamate concentration was measured at the baseline. The concentration of glutamate was significantly higher in the group of patients compared to the controls. No difference in this parameter was observed between groups of patients. A positive correlation between the severity of depression at the 28th day and the glutamate concentration was found in the groups of patients with recurrent depressive disorder. No association between glutamate concentration and the CGI-I scale score, as well as remission, was found. A high glutamate level in blood serum of patients with depressive disorders could be an indicator of glutamatergic system dysregulation. This value in the future may be used as a predictor of the effectiveness of SSRI treatment in patients with recurrent depressive disorder.     

An open study of triiodothyronine augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE: In an open trial, we investigated the efficacy of triiodothyronine (T(3)) adjuvant to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD) resistant to SSRI treatment. METHOD: Twenty subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for MDD (mean +/- SD age = 44.3 +/- 10.3 years; 55% [N = 11] women) and had failed to respond to a course of treatment of at least 8 weeks with an SSRI antidepressant were enrolled in a 4-week open-label augmentation treatment with T(3) 50 microg/day. Atypical and melancholic sub-types of MDD were diagnosed using Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders criteria. We administered the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) 4 times during the study (which was conducted between 2001 and 2003). RESULTS: During T(3) augmentation, the severity of depression decreased from an initial mean +/- SD HAM-D-17 score of 20.5 +/- 3.6 to a final HAM-D-17 score of 14.0 +/- 7.1 (p < .001). Seven subjects (35.0%) were treatment responders (HAM-D-17 reduction >or= 50%), and 6 subjects (30.0%) achieved clinical remission (final HAM-D-17 相似文献   

Hamilton Depression Scale in dementia

INTRODUCTION : Wide variations in frequency of depression in primary degenerative dementia (PDD) and in vascular dementia (VD) have been reported. This may perhaps be due to inadequacy of common diagnostic tools in detecting depression in the face of cognitive decline. We evaluated here the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) in demented patients with PDD and VD. METHODS : We examined 50 consecutive patients with PDD and 50 consecutive patients with VD. All patients underwent neurological examination and their depression was evaluated using DSM-III-R criteria and the HDRS. The data obtained were analysed for distribution of depression and pattern of responses obtained in the HDRS. Sensitivity, specificity and Youden's J-indices for different cut-off scores of the HDRS in its ability to detect depression in this population were calculated. RESULTS : Dementia was associated with depression in 38% of the patients (DSM-III-R criteria). HDRS scores were higher in depressed patients (z= -5.7, P < 0.0001) with an HDRS cut-off score of 10 being indicative of depression in demented patients. Symptoms related to 'affective' components of the HDRS (such as depressive mood and anxiety) were strongly associated with the diagnosis of depression (Mann-Whitney tests, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION : Depression is frequent in demented patients. The HDRS has good criterion validity in the evaluation of depression in demented patients. (Int J Psych Clin Pract 2002; 6: 91-94)     

Incidence and predictors of relapse during continuation treatment of major depression with SSRI, interpersonal psychotherapy, or their combination

Background: Despite the availability of many effective treatments, patients with major depression remain at risk for relapse following remission of a depressive episode. The aims of this report are to estimate the relapse rates associated with the acute treatment strategies employed in this study and to investigate demographic and clinical predictors of relapse. Methods: The study sample includes 225 patients who entered the 6‐month continuation treatment phase after remitting from an acute depressive episode. Treatment during the acute phase was interpersonal psychotherapy, SSRI (escitalopram), or the combination of the two when monotherapy did not lead to response. Relapse was defined by a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score ≥15, confirmed by the diagnosis of major depression. The probability of relapsing was modeled using logistic regression. Three separate models were fit with subgroups of covariates. Results: Of the 225 patients, 29 (12.9%) relapsed and 28 (12.4%) discontinued the protocol prematurely. The proportion of patients who relapsed among the group requiring combination treatment to achieve remission was three times as high as among patients who had remitted with monotherapy. In the final logistic regression model, older age, higher baseline HDRS scores, last month (residual) depressive mood spectrum factor score, and requiring combination treatment to achieve remission were each associated with an increased likelihood of relapse. Conclusions: Our results suggest that greater initial depression severity, greater difficulty in stabilizing symptoms, and presence of residual mood spectrum symptoms once remission is achieved are predictive of relapse. Risk of relapse is more likely as age increases, partly because aging confers lower resilience. Depression and Anxiety, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Efficacy of fluvoxamine in the treatment of major depression with comorbid anxiety disorders.

BACKGROUND: Major depression with comorbid anxiety disorder is associated with poor antidepressant outcome compared with major depression without comorbid anxiety disorder. The purpose of our study was to assess changes in depressive symptoms and anxiety levels in outpatients with major depression with comorbid anxiety disorder following 12 weeks of open treatment with fluvoxamine. METHOD: We enrolled 30 outpatients (mean +/- SD age = 39.4 +/- 11.3 years; 16 women and 14 men) with DSM-IV major depressive disorder accompanied by one or more current comorbid DSM-IV anxiety disorders in our study. Patients were treated openly with fluvoxamine initiated at 50 mg/day, with an upward titration to a maximum of 200 mg/day (mean +/- SD dose = 143 +/- 45 mg/day). Efficacy assessments included the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales for both depression and anxiety. Intent-to-treat analysis was used to assess outcome. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD number of comorbid anxiety disorders per patient was 2.1 +/- 1.1. Following fluvoxamine treatment, the mean +/- SD HAM-D-17 score dropped from 20.2 +/- 3.3 to 1 1.0 +/- 7.0 (p < .0001). The mean +/- SD depression CGI-S score dropped from 4.0 +/- 0.6 to 2.4 +/- 1.1 (p < .0001), and the mean +/- SD anxiety CGI-S score decreased from 4.1 +/- 0.8 to 2.5 +/- 1.2 (p < .0001). Eighteen (60%) of the 30 patients had CGI-I scores < or = 2 for both anxiety and depression at endpoint, with 53% showing a > or = 50% reduction in HAM-D-17 scores at endpoint. CONCLUSION: Although preliminary, our findings suggest that fluvoxamine is effective in treating outpatients with major depression with comorbid anxiety disorder, having a significant effect on both depression and anxiety symptoms. Further double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are needed, in a larger sample, to confirm our findings.     

One-year course of the first vs. multiple episodes of depression--Polish naturalistic study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare a clinical course and treatment results of depression occurring as the first depressive episode, the second depressive episode or the third or further depressive episode. The study was 1-year, prospective, naturalistic observation made by Polish psychiatrists. METHODS: One-hundred and seventy-nine patients with the first depressive episode (group I), 170 patients with the second episode (group II) and 183 patients with the third or further episode of depression (group III) were compared. The main analysed variable was remission, defined as the score of < or =7 points on 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS), after 6 and 12 months of observation. RESULTS: The groups of patients studied did not initially differ as to age, proportion of gender and intensity of depression. The percentages of remission after 6 months of observation in groups I-III were: 49%, 41% and 32%, and after 12 months 69%, 60% and 50%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained indicate that the course of subsequent depressive episodes is less favourable compared to the first depressive episode. The percentages of remission obtained in individual groups studied may have implications regarding duration of pharmacological treatment of depressive episode.     

Initial investigation of behavioral activation therapy for co-morbid major depressive disorder and obesity

More than one-third of treatment-seeking obese patients are clinically depressed. No evidence-based treatments exist for individuals with comorbid depression and obesity. Behavioral activation (BA), an effective treatment for depression, might also facilitate weight loss. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of BA plus nutrition counseling for weight loss among individuals with comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD) and obesity. The BA intervention targeted both weight reduction and depression in 14 obese patients (79% female; 86% Caucasian) who met criteria for MDD. At baseline, mean Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) score was 26.71, and mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score was 16.00. Significant reductions at 12-weeks in both BDI-II and HDRS were observed with 10 participants reaching full remission at post treatment. Reductions in body weight, daily caloric intake, and physical activity were observed. BA with nutrition counseling appears to have potential as a weight loss treatment in the context of depression. Results support the need for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of BA for both weight loss and depression. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).     

An open trial of aripiprazole augmentation for SSRI non-remitters with late-life depression

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole augmentation in elderly depressed patients who did not reach remission after treatment with an SSRI. METHOD: Outpatients 50 years and older with major depressive disorder not remitting after adequate treatment with an SSRI were eligible for the study. In the 6-week long augmentation phase, antidepressants were continued without change and aripiprazole was titrated if needed to a maximum dose of 15 mg per day. Patients were evaluated at the study endpoint on an intent to treat basis, and the primary outcome measure was remission of depression as measured by Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) 相似文献