Accuracy of hysteroscopic diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia: a retrospective study of 323 patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopic view in endometrial hyperplasia. DESIGN: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Public hospital in northern Italy. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-three patients suffering from endometrial hyperplasia out of 2251 women (1119 premenopausal and 1132 postmenopausal) who underwent office-based hysteroscopy from January 1996 through May 2004. INTERVENTION: Review of 2251 outpatient hysteroscopies carried out with 5- to 6-mm sheathed hysteroscopes and accomplished with blind or hysteroscopically targeted endometrial biopsies. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pathologic report was considered the reference test. Hysteroscopic detection of focal or extensive endometrial thickening, irregular vascular network, architectural distortion and crowding of gland openings, and gland cyst formation were considered endoscopic features consistent with hyperplasia. Overall sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values (NPV), and positive predictive values (PPV) of hysteroscopy in order to foresee a diagnosis of hyperplasia were calculated. These figures were calculated both in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients. Histopathology yielded a diagnosis of simple, complex, and atypical hyperplasia in 247, 51, and 25 patients, respectively. Hysteroscopy foresaw hyperplasia in 38.4% of patients with simple hyperplasia and in 58.9% of patients with complex or atypical hyperplasia. Normal hysteroscopic findings underestimated simple hyperplasia in 34 patients (13.7%) and complex or atypical hyperplasias in 1 patient (1.3%) (p <.01). To predict the diagnosis of hyperplasia, hysteroscopy showed an overall sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of 63.7%, 91.7%, 91.3%, and 64.7%, respectively. Among premenopausal patients, hyperplasia was diagnosed in 134 women (11.9%); in this group, hysteroscopy showed sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of 65.6%, 88.5%%, 93.5%, and 50.5%, respectively. In postmenopausal patients, we found endometrial hyperplasia in 189 women (16.6%); sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of hysteroscopic view to anticipate hyperplasia were 61.6%, 95.2%, 89.3%, and 79.4%, respectively. A significantly better PPV to foresee hyperplasia was found in postmenopausal women compared with premenopausal patients (p <.01). CONCLUSIONS: Current hysteroscopic criteria suggesting endometrial hyperplasia are inaccurate; in order to exclude hyperplasia, a pathologic assessment is warranted in all hysteroscopies showing an irregularly lined or thick endometrium.     

Atypical hyperplasia of endometrium and hysteroscopy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of discovering an endometrial cancer when atypical hyperplasia was diagnosed by either endometrial samples using the pipelle device or hysteroscopic resection products. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective monocentric study from january 1990 to july 2000. Twenty-three patients with atypical hyperplasia were included. Initial endometrial status was provided by endometrial biopsyduring diagnosis hysteroscopy (12 cases) or by operative hysteroscopic resection products (11 cases). For 23 patients, operative hysteroscopy and analyse of products resected were performed. For all patients, there was no hysteroscopical aspect evocative of adenocarcinoma. For 23 patients, histopathological analysis of the hysterectomy piece precised the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 23 hysterectomy pieces, 7 adenocarcinomas were diagnosed (30.4%). Risk for discovering adenocarcinoma when atypical hyperplasia was diagnosed by means of the pipelle biopsy device was 50% (6/12). Risk for discovering adenocarcinoma when atypical hyperplasia was diagnosed by means of operative hysteroscopy resection products was 5.9 % (1/17). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Atypical endometrial hyperplasia evidenced by pipelle biopsy device is often associated with adenocarcinoma. Diagnosis hysteroscopy however does not show evident pathological aspect of adenocarcinoma in such cases. Operative hysteroscopy allows in most cases correction of endometrial status. Risk of omitting adenocarcinoma when atypical hyperplasia is discovered on hysteroscopic resection pieces is low.     

Concurrent endometrial carcinoma following hysterectomy for atypical endometrial hyperplasia

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women diagnosed with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) by endometrial biopsy.

Study design

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 126 patients who underwent hysterectomies for AEH diagnosed by endometrial biopsy from 1999 to 2008. AEH was initially diagnosed by dilatation and curettage (98 cases) or endometrial biopsy with a Z-sampler (24 cases). The remaining four cases were diagnosed by hysteroscopic polypectomy. The results of the endometrial biopsies were graded on an ordinal scale and were compared with pathologic features obtained at the hysterectomy.

Results

In patients preoperatively diagnosed with AEH by biopsy, hysterectomy specimens revealed a rate of simple or complex endometrial hyperplasia without atypia of 27% with AEH and normal proliferative phases found in 54.7 and 7.9% of specimens, respectively. The incidence of endometrial carcinoma was considerably high (13/126, 10.3%). Eleven of 13 cases were confined to the endometrium and the remaining two were located at the adenomyosis without myometrial invasion. All patients with endometrial carcinoma displayed coexisting atypical complex hyperplasia following hysterectomy.

Conclusions

Biopsy specimens showing AEH, particularly atypical complex hyperplasia, are associated with a risk of coexisting endometrial carcinoma. When considering management strategies for women with a biopsy diagnosis of AEH, clinicians should take into account the considerable rate of concurrent endometrial cancer and the discrepancy with pathologic diagnosis. Treatment modalities may differ depending on population as the rates of concurrent endometrial cancer with AEH and myometrial invasion vary by geographical location.     

Preoperative Factors of Endometrial Carcinoma in Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia

ObjectiveTo identify clinicopathological preoperative factors associated with concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients undergoing surgical management of atypical endometrial hyperplasia.MethodsThe records of all patients who underwent hysterectomy for preoperatively diagnosed atypical endometrial hyperplasia at a tertiary care hospital from April 2017 to April 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics of patients were extracted. Patients who did not undergo hysterectomy or who had evidence of simple hyperplasia or carcinoma on initial biopsy were excluded. Univariate analysis was performed. A multivariate regression model for progression to endometrial carcinoma was developed.ResultsA total of 126 patients were included. Of these patients, 19 (15.1%) had a final diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma, whereas 86 (68.2%) retained the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and 21 (16.7%) were found to have no residual atypical endometrial hyperplasia. The odds of a patient being diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma were 6.1 times higher (95% CI 1.32–27.68) if they had an endometrial stripe thickness >1.1 cm and 13.5 times higher (95% CI 3.56–51.1) if there was histological suspicion of carcinoma. The odds of a patient being diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma were significantly lower if the patient had an initial diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia in a polyp (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.02–0.34).ConclusionOur results suggest that an endometrial stripe thickness >1.1 cm, a histological suspicion of carcinoma on preoperative pathology, and the absence of polyp involvement on initial diagnosis are the strongest predictors of endometrial carcinoma at the time of hysterectomy in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia.     

Hysteroscopic resection of symptomatic and asymptomatic endometrial polyps

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the occurrence of malignancy and atypical hyperplasia in endometrial polyps in patients with and without symptoms. DESIGN: Retrospective registration of all patients who underwent hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps. Age, menopausal status, presence or absence of symptoms, any use of hormonal medication, as well as histologic diagnosis, complications, and eventual repeated surgery were documented (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Ullevaal University Hospital, Department of Gynecology. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent hysteroscopic resection of an endometrial polyp in our department from January 1, 2001 through March 1, 2005. INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four hundred eleven patients were included. One hundred twenty-nine patients (31.4%) had no symptoms. The prevalence of malignancy or atypical hyperplasia was 3.2% in women with symptoms and 3.9% in those without symptoms. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of malignancy and atypical hyperplasia was found to be relatively high, indicating that symptomatic, as well as asymptomatic, endometrial polyps should be removed.     

Resectoscopic surgery in 10 women with abnormal uterine bleeding and atypical endometrial hyperplasia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of the resectoscope in the diagnosis and treatment of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia. DESIGN: Retrospective case series (Canadian Task Force classification III-3). SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Ten women. Intervention. Hysteroscopic evaluation after preoperative endometrial biopsy indicated simple hyperplasia without atypia, complex hyperplasia with atypia, or inadequate specimen. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Atypical hyperplasia was confirmed in eight patients after total endomyometrial resection. Hysterectomy was offered to all patients but accepted by only two: one for bilateral ovarian serous cystadenomas and the second for a granulosa cell ovarian tumor. No residual endometrium was found in hysterectomy specimens. Seven women were amenorrheic and well 1 to 9 years after resection. An additional patient with amenorrhea died from colon cancer 2 years after resection. CONCLUSION: Resectoscopic surgery confirmed or detected atypical endometrial hyperplasia in eight women and excluded it in two patients with AUB and a previous diagnosis of simple hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, or inadequate specimen. Skillful resectoscopic surgery may be an alternative to hysterectomy in selected patients with atypical hyperplasia who are compliant with regular and long-term follow-up.     

Resectoscopic surgery may be an alternative to hysterectomy in high-risk women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Endometrial hyperplasia is found in 2% to 10% of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Up to 43% of patients with cytologic atypia harbor coexisting adenocarcinoma, and approximately 20% to 52% of atypical hyperplasias, if untreated, progress to cancer. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia encountered during routine resectoscopic surgery in women with AUB and to evaluate the role of resectoscopic surgery in the management of women with AUB and atypical endometrial hyperplasia who refused and/or were at high risk for hysterectomy. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: From January 1990 through December 2005, the senior author (GAV) performed primary resectoscopic surgery in 3401 women with AUB. Among these, there were 22 women with atypical (17 complex, 5 simple) endometrial hyperplasia. INTERVENTIONS: All women underwent hysteroscopic evaluation and partial (n = 3) or complete (n = 19) endometrial electrocoagulation and/or resection. Subsequently, 6 women had hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median (range) for age, parity, and body mass index were 55 years (24-78 years), 2 (0-4), and 30.1 kg/m2 (22.5-52.2 kg/m2), respectively. Among the 3401 women, there were 22 cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia, 12 of which were incidentally diagnosed at the time of hysteroscopy (complex 10, simple 2, incidence 0.35%). After hysteroscopic diagnosis or confirmation of diagnosis, 6 women underwent hysterectomy and BSO. Of the remaining 16 women, followed for a median of 5 years (range 1.5-12 years), 1 was lost to follow-up, 1 had only a biopsy to preserve fertility, 1 died from lung cancer after 4 years, and 1 died from colon cancer after 5 years. One patient developed endometrial cancer after 10.5 years with postmenopausal bleeding. She remains alive and well 3.5 years after hysterectomy and BSO. The remaining 11 patients are amenorrheic at a median follow-up of 6 years (range 1.5-12 years). CONCLUSIONS: Resectoscopic surgery in 3391 women with AUB detected 12 incidental cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (incidence 0.35%). Skillful resectoscopic surgery may be an alternative to hysterectomy in women with AUB and atypical endometrial hyperplasia, who refuse or are at high-risk for hysterectomy and who are compliant with regular and long-term follow-up.     

Endometrial cancer in patients with preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE: Atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) has been associated with the presence of concomitant endometrial carcinoma (EC). The aim of this study is to examine the frequency of coexisting endometrial carcinoma when atypical endometrium hyperplasia was found upon biopsy. We also evaluated the influence of preoperative diagnostic techniques (pipelle and dilation and curettage (D&C)), and the value of transvaginal ultrasound in detecting unexpected tumor invasion. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 1992 and December 2003, at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Parma, and Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, 70 consecutive patients subjected to total hysterectomy with a histological diagnosis of AEH were retrospectively selected. 52/70 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy, with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) whereas 18/70 had abdominal hysterectomy with BSO within 8 weeks since the diagnosis of AEH. RESULTS: We found in 30 of the 70 patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia in the biopsy coexisting endometrial carcinoma (43%). No differences in diagnostic accuracy between the pipelle method and D&C were found. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal ultrasound was not a feasible method for predicting EC. After a follow-up of an average of 5 years there was, neither in the abdominal operated patients nor in the vaginal operated patients, a recurrence of disease.     

Clinical over- and under-estimation in patients who underwent hysterectomy for atypical endometrial hyperplasia diagnosed by endometrial biopsy: the predictive value of clinical parameters and diagnostic imaging

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and imaging characteristics in patients diagnosed with atypical endometrial hyperplasia based on endometrial biopsy in comparison with the final diagnosis from resected uteri; i.e. to determine the rates of underestimation (endometrial cancer), equivalent diagnosis (atypical hyperplasia), and overestimation (hyperplasia without atypia or non-hyperplastic lesion). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 33 patients who were diagnosed with atypical endometrial hyperplasia by endometrial biopsy using a small curette and then underwent total abdominal hysterectomy between September 1992 and May 2002. Clinical parameters obtained from patients' charts, and imaging analyses using transvaginal ultrasonography (TUS) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were retrospectively re-examined. RESULTS: Among 33 patients who underwent hysterectomy due to a diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia, nine cases (27.2%) were underestimated (cancer), nine cases (27.2%) were equivalent and 15 cases (45.6%) were overestimated as indicated by examination of the endometrium of the resected uterus. There was no difference among these groups in either clinical parameters or diagnostic images obtained by TUS or MR. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia by endometrial biopsy often resulted in under- or over-estimation, as shown by examination after hysterectomy. As there is neither a reliable clinical parameter nor imaging feature to distinguish between these groups, hysterectomy is still the best treatment for these patients if they are willing to give up their fertility.     

Risk of finding an endometrial cancer when atypical hyperplasia was incidentally diagnosed on hysteroscopic resection products

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of discovering an endometrial cancer when atypical hyperplasia was diagnosed by histologic examination of hysteroscopic resection products. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective monocentric study from January 1994 to January 2001. Seventeen patients with atypical hyperplasia were included. Initial endometrial status was provided by operative hysteroscopy resection products. For all patients, there was no hysteroscopical aspect evocative of adenocarcinoma. Histopathological analysis of the hysterectomy pieces precised the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 17 hysterectomy pieces, one adenocarcinoma was diagnosed. Risk for discovering adenocarcinoma when atypical hyperplasia was diagnosed by operative hysteroscopy resection products was 5.9% (1/17). CONCLUSION: Risk of omitting adenocarcinoma when atypical hyperplasia is discovered by hysteroscopy resection pieces is low.     

The value of curettage in diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the value of diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia by curettage and to determine the results of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunostaining in differentiating endometrial carcinoma from endometrial hyperplasia. METHODS: According to Kurman's criteria, we treated 150 patients with endometrial hyperplasia detected by curettage and compared retrospectively the diagnosis by curettage with that by hysterectomy. PCNA expression was examined using immunohistochemostaining on 60 patients with complex atypical hyperplasia detected by curettage. RESULTS: Simple hyperplasia was found by curettage in 53 patients, complex hyperplasia in 11, simple atypical hyperplasia in 26, and complex atypical hyperplasia in 60. All patients were rediagnosed after hysterectomy. As a result, 65 were found to have simple hyperplasia, 7 complex hyperplasia, 15 simple atypical hyperplasia, 29 complex atypical hyperplasia, and 34 endometrial carcinoma. The accuracy of histological diagnosis by curettage was 76.7-92.0% and was dependent on different types of hyperplasia. Simple atypical hyperplasia and complex atypical hyperplasia were more likely to coexist with endometrial carcinoma than both simple hyperplasia and complex hyperplasia (chi2 = 26.3, P < 0.001), and complex atypical hyperplasia was more likely to coexist with endometrial carcinoma than simple atypical hyperplasia (chi2 = 9.78, P < 0.005). In complex atypical hyperplasia patients, coexistence with endometrial carcinoma was more common after menopause than before menopause (chi2 = 3.93, P < 0.05). In complex atypical hyperplasia patients, the expression of PCNA in cases associated with endometrial carcinoma was higher or stronger than in cases associated without endometrial carcinoma (chi2 = 7.68, P < 0.01, or U = 252.00, P < 0.01). Conclusions. Curettage tends to be more highly accurate in diagnosing simple hyperplasia than complex atypical hyperplasia, which is often found by hysterectomy to be associated with endometrial carcinoma. The expression of PCNA may be helpful in differentiating complex atypical hyperplasia from endometrial carcinoma.     

Risk of discovering endometrial carcinoma or atypical hyperplasia during hysteroscopic surgery in postmenopausal women.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of diagnosing endometrial carcinoma or atypical hyperplasia in tissue resected during hysteroscopy performed for intrauterine pathology presumed benign in postmenopausal women. DESIGN: A single-center prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Department of Gynecology, La Conception Hospital, Marseille, France. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-five women with intrauterine pathology, presumed benign, causing postmenopausal bleeding or bleeding related to hormone replacement therapy. INTERVENTION: All women had an endometrial biopsy after diagnostic hysteroscopy to exclude endometrial carcinoma or atypical hyperplasia. Then they underwent hysteroscopic surgical resection (203, 62.5%) or endometrial ablation (122, 37.5%). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two cases each (0.6%) of endometrial carcinoma and endometrial atypical hyperplasia were discovered that were missed by preoperative evaluations. CONCLUSION: Outpatient hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy do not eliminate the finding of carcinoma or endometrial atypical hyperplasia, as these disorders may be discovered during hysteroscopic surgery.     

Which surgical procedure for patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the occult coexistence of endometrial carcinoma in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and to compare histological prognostic factors according to lymph node status in occult endometrial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and four patients from two referral centers (during the period 1990-2003) who were operated on within 1 month of endometrial biopsy for symptomatic endometrial hyperplasia without receiving any medical treatment were included retrospectively. Patients having preoperative endometrial biopsy results of concomitant endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma were excluded from the study. Fifty-six patients having atypia in preoperative biopsy (group I) were compared with 148 patients without atypia (group II). Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two groups according to age or menopausal status. Patients in group II had significantly higher parity than patients in group I. In group I, 62.5% of the patients had endometrial carcinoma, 21.4% had endometrial hyperplasia, and 16.1% had normal endometrium in hysterectomy specimens. In group II, the percentages were 5.4, 38.5, and 56.1%, respectively. Complete surgical staging was performed in 20 patients. Four patients had metastatic lymph nodes. All of them had grade 2 tumors with lymphovascular space involvement. Three of them had nonendometrioid tumors. CONCLUSION: Careful intraoperative and preoperative evaluation of the endometrium must be the sine qua non for patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia. It is reasonable to do frozen section at the time of hysterectomy for atypical endometrial hyperplasia, and if grade 2/3 of nonendometrioid cancer with lymphovascular space involvement is found, complete surgical staging should be performed.     

Endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma in endometrial polyps: clinicopathologic and follow-up findings.

The objectives of this study were: 1) to evaluate findings in follow-up hysterectomy specimens after a diagnosis of complex atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma in endometrial polyps (EMPs) for possible significance in management strategies; and 2)to identify features in these polyps, that are predictive of the presence of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma in subsequent hysterectomy. Records of all cases of EMPs with endometrial hyperplasia were retrieved from the files of New York University Medical Center from 1993 to 2005. Those cases with follow-up hysterectomy were selected for the study. Of the 29 patients with complex atypical hyperplasia within the polyp, 19 out of 29 (66%) patients had hyperplasia of the non-polyp endometrium, and adenocarcinoma was observed in 9 out of 29 (31%) patients on follow-up hysterectomy. The percentage of polyp area involved by the hyperplasia was predictive of finding endometrial disorder in subsequent hysterectomy (P = 0.005). Of the 8 patients with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) within the polyp 3 (38%) had myoinvasive adenocarcinoma. In contrast, in cases without AIS, 4 out of 21 (19%) had myoinvasive adenocarcinoma in follow-up hysterectomy. Eight of the nine cases with carcinoma in endometrial polyp had endometrial pathology on hysterectomy. Approximately two thirds of the patients with hyperplasia and 90% of patients with adenocarcinoma in endometrial polyps show endometrial pathology on subsequent hysterectomy. The above findings reinforce the need for hysterectomy especially in postmenopausal women with atypical complex hyperplasia or carcinoma in endometrial polyps even if these changes appear confined to the polyp in initial sampling.     

Histopathologic correlation of dilatation and currettage and hysterectomy specimens in patients with postmenopausal bleeding

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: To evaluate the consistency of preoperative and postoperative histopathological findings in postmenopausal patients with abnormal bleeding. METHODS: Pathologic diagnoses of 42 postmenopausal women with abnormal bleeding or increased endometrial thickness who underwent both dilatation and curettage (D and C), and hysterectomy for proper indications were retrospectively examined. RESULTS: The most common diagnosis was irregular proliferative endometrium in both the pre- and postoperative groups with 16 patients each (38%). After subgroup analysis, 50% of the patients with a preoperative diagnosis of complex hyperplasia without atypia, had complex atypical hyperplasia, and two-thirds of the patients with a preoperative diagnosis of complex atypical hyperplasia had endometrial cancer as the final diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Preoperative D and C endometrial pathology findings positively correlated with postoperative hysterectomy pathology results. However, as the real pathology gets worse , D and C seems to under-diagnose the real pathology. In cases with complex hyperplasia with or without atypia , a second D and C or hysteroscopic evaluation may be recommended.     

Comparison of ultrasonography,hysteroscopy, and biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial lesions in postmenopausal tamoxifen-treated patients

BACKGROUND: At present, no proven recommendations can be made for the surveillance of tamoxifen-treated women. The aim of the present study was to evaluate ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in this setting. METHODS: Three hundred and ten postmenopausal patients using tamoxifen underwent vaginal ultrasonography, hysteroscopy, and endometrial biopsy; 274 were asymptomatic and 49 had abnormal bleeding. Ultrasonographic endometrial thickness and echotexture were recorded. Hysteroscopic endometrial appearance, presence of focal endometrial lesions and polyps were also recorded. General or selective endometrial biopsy was performed. Ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic follow up was provided. RESULTS: At ultrasonography, mean endometrial thickness was 10.8 mm. At hysteroscopy, cystic atrophy and suspect focal lesions were detected in 49.2% and 5.3% of women, respectively. Polyps were present in 44.8% of women; 38.9% of these polyps were missed at ultrasonography, whereas 11.4% were suspected but were not found at hysteroscopy. At biopsy, non-atypical hyperplasia and atypical changes were found in 4.8% and 1.3% of patients, respectively. Three carcinomas were found, all in asymptomatic women. Logistic regression analysis showed that only suspect focal lesions at hysteroscopy were significantly associated with abnormal histology. With a 6-mm cut-off value for endometrial thickness, negative and positive predictive values for ultrasonography in detecting hyperplastic or neoplastic changes were 96% and 8%, respectively; the corresponding values for hysteroscopy were 96% and 65%. No additional carcinoma was found at follow up. CONCLUSIONS: No single ultrasonographic feature (echotexture and borders) is significantly associated with the detection of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma; hysteroscopy, although not predictive unless revealing a focal lesion, is more accurate in detecting polyps and hyperplastic changes.     

Hysteroscopic findings of endometrial carcinoma. Evaluation of 104 cases

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: Retrospective evaluation of hysteroscopic findings in the accurate diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective monocentric study from January 1995 to December 2004. One hundred and four patients with hysteroscopic aspects evocative of endometrial carcinoma confirmed by endometrial biopsy during diagnostic hysteroscopy, by surgical hysteroscopic resection pieces or by hysterectomy specimen were included. RESULTS: Among the 104 patients, diagnostic hysteroscopy pointed out endometrial features suggestive of endometrial carcinoma in 102 cases. In two women diagnostic hysteroscopy failed to diagnose endometrial malignancy which was identified on pieces of polyps by surgical hysteroscopic resection. DISCUSSION: Polypoid proliferations cerebroid in appearance, with ulceration and necrosis, friable and with irregular vessels, represent endometrial findings highly indicative of malignancy. The diagnosis may be missed in cases of focal neoplasias, within endometrial polyps or in conditions of unsatisfactory endouterine visualization.     

Prevalence of underlying adenocarcinoma in women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

There is controversy regarding the prevalence of underlying endometrial adenocarcinoma among women with a diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia. This study further defines that risk. At our institution atypical endometrial proliferations non-diagnostic for invasive adenocarcinoma are diagnosed as either atypical endometrial hyperplasia (ATHY) or as an "atypical proliferative lesion of the endometrium, suggestive but not diagnostic of atypical endometrial hyperplasia" (APL). Between 1996 and 2003, these diagnoses were made on either endometrial biopsy or endometrial curettings in 60 women who subsequently received a hysterectomy. Endometrial adenocarcinoma was identified in 48% (29/60) of the hysterectomy specimens. Age and sampling method had no significant impact on the prevalence of adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinoma was no more likely to be subsequently identified when a woman had a preoperative diagnosis of ATHY (24 of 52, 46%) compared to APL (5 of 8, 63%). In some women with a diagnosis of ATHY a comment was made in the report that "carcinoma cannot be ruled out". These cases had a significantly higher prevalence of underlying adenocarcinoma (16 of 25, 64%) compared to cases of ATHY in which such a comment was not made (8 of 27, 30%) (p = 0.025). In conclusion, there is a high prevalence of underlying endometrial adenocarcinoma among women undergoing hysterectomy for any of atypical endometrial proliferation.     

Prediction of Premalignant and Malignant Endometrial Polyps by Clinical and Hysteroscopic Features

Study ObjectiveTo investigate whether hysteroscopic features can contribute to the diagnosis of malignancy in endometrial polyps.DesignRetrospective review.SettingObstetrics and gynecology department.PatientsAll women who underwent operative hysteroscopy for the removal of endometrial polyps between January 2012 and September 2017. Their medical records were reviewed, and information on medical, surgical, and obstetric history and hysteroscopic findings (including the number, size, and vascular appearance of the polyps) were abstracted.InterventionsOperative hysteroscopy with resection or biopsy of endometrial polyps.Measurements and Main ResultsFive hundred fifty-six women were included in the study. Their mean age was 55.4 ± 12.4 years, and 322 (57.9%) were menopausal. Endometrial carcinoma was found in 26 (4.7%) cases, whereas endometrial hyperplasia was found in 5 (0.9%) cases. Endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia was significantly associated with patients’ age, menopausal status, increased polyp vascularity on hysteroscopy, and the presence of 3 or more polyps on hysteroscopy (p <.01 for all comparisons). However, the size of the largest polyp was not associated with endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia. On logistic regression analysis, only increased polyp vascularity was associated with endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia (odds ratio =13.5; 95% confidence interval, 5.6–32.3; p <.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of polyp vascularity for the diagnosis of polyps of nonbenign pathology were 51.6%, 94.3%, 34.8%, and 97.1%, respectively.ConclusionHysteroscopic findings of increased vascularity of endometrial polyps and numerous endometrial polyps may suggest the diagnosis of malignant polyps, in addition to demographic parameters such as age and menopausal status.