Human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA as a triage test after detection of HPV 16 and HPV 18 DNA

High‐risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection provides high sensitivity but low specificity for moderate‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse histological identification. A prospective study evaluated mRNA testing efficacy for predicting this histological diagnosis in case of HPV 16 and/or 18 DNA detection. A total of 165 endocervical samples harboring HPV 16 and/or 18 DNA were tested with NucliSENS‐EasyQ® HPV E6/E7‐mRNA‐assay (Biomerieux, Marcy l´Etoile, France). Women with cytological alterations were referred to colposcopy (n = 111). Moderate‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse was diagnosed in 25.8% of women presenting atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and in 89.8% of women with high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. mRNA sensitivity was 81.3% and 84.1%, respectively. Specificity was 52.2%, and 80.0%, respectively. Negative predictive value (NPV) was 88.9% in undetermined or low‐grade squamous lesions. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 97.4% in high‐grade squamous lesions. mRNA reduced colposcopies by 44.3% in undetermined or low‐grade squamous lesions. Direct treatment of mRNA‐positive cases reduced 77.5% of colposcopies in high‐grade squamous lesions. Women without cytological alterations were followed for 18 months (n = 35), and moderate‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse was diagnosed in 34.3%; mRNA sensitivity and specificity were 83.3% and 86.9%, respectively. PPV and NPV were 76.9% and 90.9%, respectively for predicting moderate‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse in 18 months. mRNA reduced the number of visits for follow‐up in 62.2%. In conclusion, NucliSENS‐EasyQ® HPV E6/E7‐mRNA‐assay (Biomerieux) can serve as a triage test in case of HPV 16 and/or 18 DNA detection. J. Med. Virol. 85: 1063–1068, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Human papillomavirus (HPV) in atypical squamous cervical cytology: the Invader HPV test as a new screening assay

In surveillance for cervical neoplasia, a diagnosis of cytologically atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) presents a significant clinical issue, often dependent on testing for high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) for the triage of patients. HPV type 16 now appears to be a critical concern in the follow-up of patients with ASCUS. The Invader HPV (Inv2) test, by Third Wave Technologies, Inc., is a recently developed analyte-specific reagent assay that uses probe sets for the detection of 14 HR HPV subtypes. These probe sets are A5/A6 (HPV types 51, 56, and 66), A7 (HPV types 18, 39, 45, 59, and 68), and A9 (HPV types 16, 31, 33, 35, 52, and 58). This report describes the performance characteristics of the Inv2 test in the screening of ASCUS cervical cytology specimens and correlates the results of the Inv2 test with those of the Hybrid Capture II HPV (HC2) test by Digene. The linear array HPV genotyping test (Roche Molecular Systems) was used as a reference method for the testing of samples with discordant results. Ninety-four Pap smear samples with a cytological diagnosis of ASCUS and 39 samples with a negative diagnosis were tested. The results of the Inv2 test demonstrated a good (86.6%) concordance with those of the HC2 test, with an overall sensitivity and specificity of 96% for the Inv2 test. Additionally, the Inv2 assay, which offers high-throughput, semiautomated DNA extraction, allows the subgrouping of HPV types by differential probe sets, could provide a useful test for screening for HPV, and has the potential to provide an improved means of risk stratification and the selection of patients for further HPV subtyping.     

Comparing triage algorithms using HPV DNA genotyping,HPV E7 mRNA detection and cytology in high-risk HPV DNA-positive women

BackgroundHigh-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) DNA positive women require triage testing to identify those with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer (≥CIN2).ObjectiveComparing three triage algorithms (1) E7 mRNA testing following HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58 genotyping (E7 mRNA test), (2) HPV16/18 DNA genotyping and (3) cytology, for ≥CIN2 detection in hrHPV DNA-positive women.Study designhrHPV DNA-positive women aged 18–63 years visiting gynecology outpatient clinics were included in a prospective observational cohort study. From these women a cervical scrape and colposcopy-directed biopsies were obtained. Cervical scrapes were evaluated by cytology, HPV DNA genotyping by bead-based multiplex genotyping of GP5+6+-PCR-products, and presence of HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58 E7 mRNA using nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) in DNA positive women for respective HPV types. Sensitivities and specificities for ≥CIN2 were compared between E7 mRNA test and HPV16/18 DNA genotyping in the total group (n = 348), and E7 mRNA test and cytology in a subgroup of women referred for non-cervix-related gynecological complaints (n = 133).ResultsSensitivity for ≥CIN2 of the E7 mRNA test was slightly higher than that of HPV16/18 DNA genotyping (66.9% versus 60.9%; ratio 1.10, 95% CI: 1.0002–1.21), at similar specificity (54.8% versus 52.3%; ratio 1.05, 95% CI: 0.93–1.18). Neither sensitivity nor specificity of the E7 mRNA test differed significantly from that of cytology (sensitivity: 68.8% versus 75.0%; ratio 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72–1.17; specificity: 59.4% versus 65.3%; ratio 0.91, 95% CI: 0.75–1.10).ConclusionFor detection of ≥CIN2 in hrHPV DNA-positive women, an algorithm including E7 mRNA testing following HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58 DNA genotyping performs similar to HPV16/18 DNA genotyping or cytology.     

HPV16/18和HPV16E6/E7DNA在宫颈癌组织中的表达

目的检测HPV16/18和HPV16E6/E7 DNA在宫颈癌组织中的表达,探讨其在宫颈癌发病中的作用.方法应用PCR和琼脂糖凝胶电泳方法检测46例宫颈癌组织中HPV16/18和HPV16E6/E7DNA.结果 46例宫颈癌中56.5%(26/46)扩增HPV16/18 DNA,其中宫颈鳞癌25例,宫颈腺癌1例.正常对照组20例HPV16/18DNA均为阴性,与宫颈癌组相比差异有显著性(P<0.01).HPV16/18 DNA阳性拷贝对数值为4.32±2.45.HPV16E6,E7DNA分别有53.8%(14/26)、46.2%(12/26)扩增.结论 HPV16/18和HPV16E6/E7 DNA与宫颈癌的发生密切相关,是宫颈癌恶性转化的关键之一,预示着宫颈癌有较强的增殖能力和转移能力.     

HPV DNA、E6/E7 mRNA在各子宫颈病变及子宫颈鳞状细胞癌中的表达

目的 探讨HPV DNA和E6/E7 mRNA在各子宫颈病变及子宫颈鳞状细胞癌(cervical squamous cell carcinoma,CSCC)中的表达,并分析其与CSCC发生、发展的相关性。方法 应用PCR-反向杂交法和支链DNA技术对210例低级别鳞状上皮内病变(low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,LSIL)、200例高级别鳞状上皮内病变(high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,HSIL)及240例CSCC进行HPV DNA及E6/E7 mRNA的检测。结果 HSIL、CSCC中,HPV DNA百分率分别为100.00%、89.58%,呈递减趋势(P0.001);E6/E7 mRNA百分率分别为52.50%、95.83%,呈递增趋势(P0.001);HPV DNA+/mRNA+的百分率分别为52.50%、87.50%,呈递增趋势(P0.001);HPV DNA-/mRNA-的百分率分别为0、6.25%,呈递增趋势(P0.001)。LSIL、HSIL中,HPV DNA百分率均大于E6/E7 mRNA百分率,差异有统计学意义(P0.001);而CSCC中HPV DNA百分率均小于E6/E7 mRNA百分率,差异有统计学意义(P=0.008)。结论 HPV DNA在LSIL、HSIL中的表达较E6/E7 mRNA高;CSCC中HPV DNA表达较E6/E7 mRNA低,因此HPV DNA标志物可能与CSCC的发生过程关系较为紧密;E6/E7 mRNA标志物可能与CSCC的发展相关性更高。     

北京地区人乳头瘤病毒16型感染及其E6/E7基因变异与宫颈病变的相关性研究

目的探讨HPV16感染及其E6/E7基因变异与宫颈病变的相关性。方法采用导流杂交技术进行HPV感染分型检测,PCR扩增出80份HPV16阳性宫颈病变的E6/E7基因、克隆入pMD18-T载体,双向测序分析基因变异与宫颈病变相关性。结果HPV16在宫颈病变患者中的检出率最高为33.3%(154/463),与病变程度相关(P<0.05)。E6/E7基因72份测序成功,DNA序列变异发生率为88.9%(64/72)。氨基酸序列E6-D32E(T96G)和E7-N29S(A86G)位点突变同时伴随存在,D32E/N29S的检出率为38.9%(28/72),与宫颈病变程度相关(P<0.05)。结论HPV16是北京地区来源的宫颈病变中最常见的致病型,其D32E/N29S变异与病变程度相关。     

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) E6/E7 mRNA testing by PreTect HPV-Proofer for detection of cervical high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer among hrHPV DNA-positive women with normal cytology

Our aim was to investigate whether high-risk HPV (hrHPV) mRNA detection by PreTect HPV-Proofer can be used to stratify hrHPV DNA-positive women of different cytology classes for risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (cervical precancer or cancer, i.e., cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher [≥ CIN2]). A total of 375 women participating in population-based screening, with a GP5+/6+-PCR hrHPV DNA-positive cervical scrape with normal cytology (n = 202), borderline or mild dyskaryosis (BMD) (n = 88), or moderate dyskaryosis or worse (>BMD) (n = 85), were enrolled. Cervical scrapes were additionally subjected to HPV16/18/31/33/45 E6/E7 mRNA analysis by PreTect HPV-Proofer (mRNA test). Referral and follow-up policies were based on cytology, hrHPV DNA, and mRNA testing. The primary study endpoint was the number of ≥CIN2 detected within 3 years of follow-up. The mRNA positivity increased with the severity of cytological abnormality, ranging from 32% (64/202) in hrHPV DNA-positive women with normal cytology to 47% (41/88) in BMD and 68% (58/85) in >BMD groups (P < 0.01). Women with ≥ CIN2 were more likely to test positive by mRNA test (63%) than women without evidence of ≥ CIN2 (32%; P < 0.01). A positive mRNA test result conferred an increased ≥ CIN2 risk in hrHPV DNA-positive women with normal cytology, i.e., 0.55 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.34 to 0.76) in mRNA-positive versus 0.20 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.33) in mRNA-negative women. In hrHPV DNA-positive women with BMD or >BMD, the result of the mRNA test did not influence the ≥ CIN2 risk. In conclusion, mRNA testing by PreTect HPV-Proofer might be of value to select hrHPV DNA-positive women with normal cytology in need of immediate referral for colposcopy.     

Aptima HPV E6/E7 mRNA test is as sensitive as Hybrid Capture 2 Assay but more specific at detecting cervical precancer and cancer

Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 oncogene expression may be more predictive of cervical cancer risk than testing for HPV DNA. The Aptima HPV test (Gen-Probe) detects E6/E7 mRNA of 14 oncogenic types. Its clinical performance was compared with that of the Hybrid Capture 2 DNA test (HC2; Qiagen) in women referred for colposcopy and those routinely screened. Aptima was also compared with the PreTect HPV-Proofer E6/E7 mRNA assay (Proofer; Norchip) in the referral population. Cervical specimens collected in PreservCyt (Hologic Inc.) were processed for HPV detection and genotyping with the Linear Array (LA) method (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Laval, Quebec, Canada). Histology-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2) or worse (CIN 2+) served as the disease endpoint. On the basis of 1,418 referral cases (CIN 2+, n = 401), the sensitivity of Aptima was 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.4, 98.2), whereas it was 94.3% (95% CI, 92.0, 96.6) for HC2. The specificities were 43.2% (95% CI, 40.2, 46.2) and 38.7% (95% CI, 35.7, 41.7), respectively (P < 0.05). In 1,373 women undergoing routine screening (CIN 2+, n = 7), both Aptima and HC2 showed 100% sensitivity, and the specificities were 88.3% (95% CI, 86.6, 90.0) and 85.3% (95% CI, 83.5, 87.3), respectively (P < 0.05); for women ≥ 30 years of age (n = 845), the specificities were 93.9% (95% CI, 92.3, 95.5) and 92.1% (95% CI, 90.3, 93.9), respectively (P < 0.05). On the basis of 818 referral cases (CIN 2+, n = 235), the sensitivity of Aptima was 94.9% (95% CI, 92.1, 97.7) and that of Proofer was 79.1% (95% CI, 73.9, 84.3), and the specificities were 45.8% (95% CI, 41.8, 49.8) and 75.1% (95% CI, 71.6, 78.6), respectively (P < 0.05). Both Aptima and Proofer showed a higher degree of agreement with LA genotyping than HC2. In conclusion, the Aptima test is as sensitive as HC2 but more specific for detecting CIN 2+ and can serve as a reliable test for both primary cervical cancer screening and the triage of borderline cytological abnormalities.     

高危型人乳头状瘤病毒和宫颈细胞学联合检测在诊断宫颈病变中的临床价值

目的 探讨高危型人乳头状瘤病毒(hish-risk human papillomavirus,HR-HPV)和宫颈细胞学联合检测在诊断宫颈病变中的临床价值.方法 对2004年10月至2006年12月北京大学第一医院就诊的患者进行HR-HPV检测和宫颈细胞学检查,对一项或两项结果异常者均行阴道镜下宫颈活检,并以宫颈活检结果为金标准,比较HR-HPV检测、宫颈细胞学检查、HR-HPV和宫颈细胞学联合检测对宫颈病变的诊断价值.结果 HR-HPV检测、宫颈细胞学检查及HR-HPV检测联合宫颈细胞学检查对诊断宫颈病变有不同价值.HR-HPV检测筛查CINⅡ、CINⅢ的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为94.83%、31.06%、55.22%、87.02%,宫颈细胞学筛查CINⅡ、CINⅢ的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为92.10%、31.06%、54.50%、81.43%,HR-HPV和宫颈细胞学联合检测筛查CINⅡ、CINⅢ的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为99.65%、18.55%、61.46%、97.62%.结论 采用HR-HPV和宫颈细胞学联合检测可提高宫颈病变的检出率,并可指导临床医生对宫颈病变的治疗.     

High-throughput cervical cancer screening using intracellular human papillomavirus E6 and E7 mRNA quantification by flow cytometry

The Papanicolaou (Pap) test, based solely on the morphologic examination of exfoliated cells from the cervix, has reduced deaths due to cervical cancer by 74% in the United States during the past 40 years. During that time, the molecular mechanisms of cervical cancer have largely been elucidated. Taken together, these observations have identified a need for a high-throughput cervical cancer screening assay. We report the development of a high-throughput assay consisting of simultaneous immunophenotyping and ultrasensitive in situ hybridization for human papillomavirus (HPV) E6 and E7 messenger RNA (mRNA). This assay can be performed in less than 3 hours directly from liquid-based cervical cytology specimens. Overall, HPV fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for E6 and E7 mRNA demonstrated 83.3% sensitivity and 91.3% specificity for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions compared with the Pap test in 231 liquid-based cytology samples from 2 cohorts. In a subset of these samples, HPV FISH demonstrated higher sensitivity and specificity than Hybrid Capture (Digene, Gaithersburg, MD) for high-risk genotypes.     

Isolation of RNA from residual BD SurePath liquid-based cytology specimens and detection of HPV E6/E7 mRNA using the PreTectt HPV-Proofer assay

Infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is known to be associated directly with the development of cervical cancer. Recent data suggests that the detection of E6/E7 mRNA from high-risk HPV types may serve as a better diagnostic method for detecting the presence of cervical pre-cancer than HPV DNA testing. This report details a commercially available nucleic acid isolation protocol which can be used to isolate reproducibly RNA from residual BD SurePath liquid-based cytology specimens stored for up to 28 days, and have demonstrated the quality and quantity of mRNA is sufficient for detection with the NorChip PreTect HPV-Proofer assay. Of the 242 specimens tested in this study, 236 (97.5%) tested positive for U1A internal control gene expression. HPV type 16, 18, 31, 33 or 45 mRNA was detected in 16/20 (80%) of the analyzed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) specimens, with a low frequency of HPV mRNA detected in the normal lesions (3%). The presence of HPV E6 expression in a subset of HPV positive specimens was also detected by real-time RT-PCR. These findings confirm that RNA of sufficient quality can be isolated from residual BD SurePath cervical cytology specimens for use in downstream NASBA and RT-PCR-based assays.     

5-type HPV mRNA versus 14-type HPV DNA test: test performance,over-diagnosis and overtreatment in triage of women with minor cervical lesions

Background

Repeat cytology and HPV testing is used in triage of women with minor cytological lesions. The objective of this study was to evaluate 14-type HPV DNA and 5-type HPV mRNA testing in delayed triage of women with ASC-US/LSIL.

Methods

We compared a DNA test (Roche Cobas 4800) and an 5-type mRNA test (PreTect HPV-Proofer). In total 564 women were included in the study.

Results

The sensitivity among solved cases for CIN3+ were 100 % (15/15) for both tests. The sensitivity for CIN2+ of the HPV DNA test was 100 % (38/38) relative to 79 % (30/38) for the 5-type HPV mRNA test. The corresponding estimates of specificity for CIN2+ among solved cases were 84 % (393/466; 95 % CI: 81–88) and 91 % (451/498; 95 % CI: 88–93). The positive predictive values for CIN3+ were 13.5 % (15/111) for DNA+ and 19.5 % (15/77) for 5-type mRNA+. Significantly more women screened with 5-type mRNA than DNA returned to screening (81 % vs 71 %, p?<?0.01). Subsequently, significantly fewer women were referred for colposcopy/biopsies/treatment (19 % (105/564) vs 29 % (165/564), p?<?0.01).

Conclusions

5-type HPV mRNA is more specific than 14-type HPV DNA in delayed triage of women with ASC-US/LSIL. The referral rate for colposcopy was 57 % higher for DNA+ relative to mRNA+ cases (165 vs 105), with the same detection rate of CIN3+, but the 5-type mRNA test had lower sensitivity for CIN2+. It is important to consider the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test when designing screening algorithms.

     

Pilot study of a commercialized human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assay: comparison of HPV risk group to cytology and histology

We evaluated a commercialized PCR assay, Linear Array, that detects 37 human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes, using a sample of liquid cytology specimens (n = 534). We found a strong association of an increasing level of HPV risk (HPV type 16 [HPV16] > HPV18 > other carcinogenic types > noncarcinogenic types > negative specimens) with increasing severities of cytologic interpretations (P(Trend) < 0.0005) and histologic diagnoses (P(Trend) < 0.0005).