Heterogeneity of angiotensin II AT2 receptors in the rat brain.

Angiotensin II (AT) receptor subtypes (AT1, selectively displaced by DuP 753, and AT2, selectively displaced by PD123177 and CGP42112A) were characterized by quantitative autoradiography after incubation with the AT agonist 125I-Sar1-AT, in specific brain nuclei of young (2-week-old) rats. Binding to AT1 receptors was sensitive (decreased affinity) to incubation in the presence of guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTP gamma S). Only the AT1 receptors in the paraventricular nucleus were sensitive to pertussis toxin, indicating the possibility of the existence of AT1 receptor subtypes. The sensitivity of AT2 receptors to GTP gamma S was heterogeneous. In the ventral thalamic and medial geniculate nuclei and in the locus coeruleus, binding to AT2 receptors was sensitive to GTP gamma S and to pertussis toxin pretreatment. Conversely, in the inferior olive, binding was insensitive to GTP gamma S and to pertussis toxin pretreatment. We propose the nomenclature of AT2A receptors for those receptors sensitive to guanine nucleotides and pertussis toxin and that of AT2B receptors for those showing no sensitivity to guanine nucleotides or pertussis toxin treatment.     

Role of angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptors in mediating the renal effects of angiotensin II in the anaesthetized dog.

1. Experiments were performed using the selective AT1 receptor antagonist, GR117289, and the selective AT2 receptor antagonist, PD123177, to assess the relative importance of AT1 versus AT2 receptors in mediating the renal effects of angiotensin II (AII) in vivo, in salt-replete pentobarbitone-anaesthetized dogs. 2. The AT1 receptor antagonist, GR117289 (0.5 mg kg-1 + 1 microgram kg-1 min-1, i.v.), caused renal vasodilatation, characterized by a mean increase of 21 +/- 5% in renal blood flow, 45 min post-dose. GR117289 also caused a fall in mean blood pressure (12 +/- 4%), but despite this, sodium and urine excretion were not reduced. Indeed, there was a tendency for urine output and sodium excretion to increase, although the changes were not statistically significant. GR117289 caused a reduction in plasma aldosterone levels (-35 +/- 16%) 45 min post-dose, despite increasing plasma renin activity (+ 173 +/- 42%). In contrast to GR117289, the AT2 receptor antagonist, PD123177 (20 micrograms kg-1 min-1 intra-renal artery; i.r.a.) caused no significant change in blood pressure, renal blood flow, or sodium and urine excretion, indicating that the renal effects of endogenous AII in these salt-replete animals are mediated predominantly by AT1 receptors. 3. Intra-renal artery infusion of AII (1-300 ng kg-1 min-1) caused dose-related renal vasoconstriction, and decreases in urine output, sodium excretion, fractional excretion of sodium, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Chronic hypotensive effects of losartan are not dependent on the actions of angiotensin II at AT 2 receptors.

We have previously demonstrated the chronic hypotensive effects of the AT1 antagonist, losartan, in normotensive, salt-replete rats. One explanation for this response is a reduction in vascular resistance due to blockade of AT1 receptors. Another explanation is that increases in angiotensin II levels during losartan administration can bind to AT2 receptors. Studies suggest that binding of angiotensin II at AT2 receptors lowers arterial pressure by vasodilation. We hypothesized that the chronic effects of losartan are mediated by activation of angiotensin II effects at AT2 receptors. We tested this hypothesis by infusing the AT2 receptor antagonist, PD123319 (74 mg/kg/day), in conjunction with losartan (10 mg/kg/day) for 10 days in rats and compared the hypotensive response in rats treated with losartan alone. After 6 days of treatment, arterial pressure decreased similarly in losartan (-21 +/- 2 mm Hg) and losartan+PD123319 (-23 +/- 2 mm Hg) treated rats. However, by day 10 of the infusion, arterial pressure had decreased to a greater extent (p < 0.05) in rats treated with losartan and PD123319 (-31 +/- 2 mm Hg) compared with rats treated with losartan alone (-22 +/- 2 mm Hg). We conclude that the hypotensive effects of losartan are not dependent on the actions of angiotensin II at AT 2 receptors in normotensive, salt-replete rats.     

A cholinergic link in the centrally mediated actions of angiotensin II

This study was designed to determine the role of brain cholinergic mechanisms in the centrally mediated blood pressure and drinking responses to angiotensin II (ANG II). Atropine (10 mg/kg, IV), but not methyl atropine (8 mg/kg, IV), significantly inhibited drinking and BP responses to ANG II intracerebroventricularly (ICV). BP responses to IV ANG II were not inhibited. Both atropine (20 mg/kg, IP) and methyl atropine (20 mg/kg, IP) inhibited cellular-dehydration thirst induced by injection of hypertonic saline. Hemicholinium (80 μg/kg, ICV) had similar effects to atropine on BP and drinking responses to ICV ANG II. Phentolamine (0.5 mg/kg, IV) had a small but significant inhibitory effect on the drinking but not the BP response to ANG II ICV. It is concluded that brain cholinergic mechanisms contribute both to the drinking and pressor response to ICV ANG II, and to the drinking response to cellular-dehydration thirst. There may also be a peripheral cholinergic component to cellular dehydration but not ICV ANG II-induced thirst.     

Type-1 and type-2 angiotensin II receptors in fetal rat brain.

Brain angiotensin II receptors were located in 18-day-old rat embryos by quantitative autoradiography. In the nucleus of the solitary tract and choroid plexus, binding was displaced by the type-1 antagonist DuP 753. In the inferior olive, paratrigeminal and hypoglossal nuclei, binding was displaced by the type-2 antagonist CGP 42112 A. Meninges and cephalic soft tissues contained predominantly type-2 angiotensin II receptors. Our results indicate a role for type-1 and type-2 angiotensin II receptors during brain development.     

A comparison of AT1 angiotensin II antagonists at pre- and postjunctional angiotensin II receptors of the rat tail artery

A comparison was made of the influence of candesartan, ZD7155, losartan and eprosartan on angiotensin II effects at pre- and postjunctional AT(1) receptors of the rat tail artery. To study the anti-angiotensin II effect at prejunctional receptors, the tissues were preincubated with [(3)H]noradrenaline and then superfused and electrically stimulated (1 Hz, 2 ms, 50 mA, during 5 min); to study the angiotensin II effect at postjunctional receptors, non-cumulative concentration-response curves to angiotensin II were determined in the absence and in the presence of the antagonist. p A(2) values were calculated for competitive antagonists and p D'(2) values for insurmountable antagonists. At the prejunctional level, losartan and eprosartan displayed competitive antagonism with p A(2) values of 6.50 and 8.08, respectively, whereas candesartan and ZD7155 displayed non-competitive antagonism with p D'(2) values of 8.71 and 7.98, respectively. At the postjunctional level, the four antagonists displayed the same kind of antagonism as prejunctionally with p A(2) values for losartan and eprosartan of 8.52 and 8.22, respectively, and p D'(2) values of 10.62 and 9.01, for candesartan and ZD7155, respectively. The ratios between post- and prejunctional potencies were: losartan 101, candesartan 81, ZD7155 11, and eprosartan 1.4. We conclude that, at least functionally, pre- and postjunctional angiotensin II AT(1) receptors are different and propose that the prejunctional receptors in this tissue belong to the AT(1B)-subtype.     

Role of angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptors in cardiac hypertrophy and cardiac remodelling

1. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an independent cardiovascular risk factor. Angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonism has been considered as a specific approach to block the renin-angiotensin system and been demonstrated to be able to prevent or regress LVH by interfering with the remodelling process of the heart. 2. Angiotensin AT1 receptor blockade induces a marked increase in angiotensin (Ang) II, which may stimulate the AT2 receptors. Gene expression of AT1 and AT2 receptors increases in a time-dependent manner in cardiac remodelling following myocardial infarction. 3. Considerable efforts have been made to clarify the role of AT2 receptors in cardiac hypertrophy and remodelling since the mid-1990s, resulting in controversial reports: the AT2 receptor mediates actions either opposite to or in coordination with those of the AT1 receptor. Moreover, there are many reports of no significant effects mediated by AT2 receptors. 4. Based on the studies reviewed in the present article, we assume that the predominant effect of AngII in cardiac hypertrophy and cardiac remodelling is growth promoting and that this effect is mediated mainly via AT1 receptors. The AT2 receptors may affect the hypertrophic process by interacting with other cardiac membrane proteins, enzymes and autacoids. Before coming to a conclusion as to whether AT2 receptor stimulation or antagonism is beneficial to the heart, more studies should be performed in different LVH models, especially long-term treatment protocols in vivo.     

Distinction between surmountable and insurmountable selective AT1 receptor antagonists by use of CHO-K1 cells expressing human angiotensin II AT1 receptors

1. CHO-K1 cells that were stably transfected with the gene for the human AT1 receptor (CHO-AT1 cells) were used for pharmacological studies of non-peptide AT1 receptor antagonists. 2. In the presence of 10 mM LiCl, angiotensin II caused a concentration-dependent and long-lasting increase of inositol phosphates accumulation with an EC50 of 3.4 nM. No angiotensin II responses are seen in wild-type CHO-K1 cells. 3. [3H]-Angiotensin II bound to cell surface AT1 receptors (dissociates under mild acidic conditions) and is subject to rapid internalization. 4. Non-peptide selective AT1 antagonists inhibited the angiotensin II (0.1 microM) induced IP accumulation and the binding of [3H]-angiotensin II (1 nM) with the potency order: candesartan > EXP3174 > irbesartan > losartan. Their potencies are lower in the presence of bovine serum albumin. 5. Preincubation with the insurmountable antagonist candesartan decreased the maximal angiotensin II induced inositol phosphate accumulation up to 94% and, concomitantly, decreased the maximal binding capacity of the cell surface receptors. These inhibitory effects were half-maximal for 0.6 nM candesartan and were attenuated by simultaneous preincubation with 1 microM losartan indicating a syntopic action of both antagonists. 6. Losartan caused a parallel rightward shift of the angiotensin II concentration-response curves and did not affect the maximal binding capacity. EXP3174 (the active metabolite of losartan) and irbesartan showed a mixed-type behavior in both functional and binding studies. 7. Reversal of the inhibitory effect was slower for candesartan as compared with EXP3174 and irbesartan and it was almost instantaneous for losartan, suggesting that the insurmountable nature of selective AT1 receptor antagonists in functional studies was related to their long-lasting inhibition.     

The AT2 subtype of the angiotensin II receptors has differential sensitivity to dithiothreitol in specific brain nuclei of young rats.

We studied the effect of the sulfhydryl reducing agent dithiothreitol on the binding of the angiotensin II agonist [125I][Sar1]-angiotensin II to AT2 receptors in selected brain areas of young (2-week-old) rats. In the inferior olive and the hypoglossal nucleus, angiotensin II binding to AT2 receptors was insensitive to 5 mM dithiothreitol. Conversely, in the ventral and mediodorsal thalamic, medial geniculate, and oculomotor nuclei, the superior colliculus and the cerebellar cortex, incubation with 5 mM dithiothreitol significantly decreased angiotensin II binding to AT2 receptors to about 40% of control. These data suggest that brain AT2 receptors are heterogeneous with respect to their sensitivity to sulfhydryl reducing agents.     

Vascular angiotensin AT2 receptors in hypertension and ageing

1. Angiotensin II (Ang II) acts on both subtype 1 receptors (AT1R) and subtype 2 receptors (AT2R). AT1R stimulation mediates all of the classical actions of Ang II including vasoconstriction and cardiovascular hypertrophy. By contrast, AT2R stimulation is thought to exert a counter-regulatory effect on AT1R and exert direct vasodilatation and antigrowth effects. 2. In this brief review, the vascular effects of AT2R are reviewed in the context of recent data relating to hypertension and ageing. 3. In particular the vascular AT2R phenotype in isolated mesenteric arteries may switch from that of relaxation to contraction in hypertension or ageing and this AT2R contractile phenotype can be converted to relaxation, at least with chronic antihypertensive treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats. 4. In vivo data pertaining to hypertension and ageing are consistent with vasodilator and antiremodelling effects of AT2R.     

Hybrid formation between the intracellular faces of the bradykinin B2 and angiotensin II AT1 receptors and signal transduction

Most frequently, the physiologic functions of the angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor (AT1R) and bradykinin B2 receptor (BKB2R) are antagonistic, particularly with respect to the regulation of vascular tone. Despite major differences in their physiologic actions, the receptors share sequence similarities. Both link to Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) and transduce very similar signal paths, not only those relating to the traditional G-protein associated second messengers, but also those involved in transactivation mechanisms involving receptor tyrosine kinases. With respect to these paths, some differences in signaling may be accounted for by cell type specificity. However, alternative signal cascades for these two receptors are becoming increasingly evident. One such is the recruitment of signaling molecules upon receptor translocation and internalization. The AT1R translocates into clathrin-coated pits and internalizes upon recruitment of beta-arrestin 2 which then recruits ASK1 and JNK3. The BKB2R translocates and internalizes mainly via caveolae. Another signaling divergence may be due to the direct activation of small G-proteins by both receptors. AT1R activates the RhoA, Rac1, Cdc42 while BKB2R couples only with Rac1 and Cdc42. Both receptors may serve as docking stations for intracellular proteins. One such example is the YIPP motif within the C-terminus of the ATIR which associates with the JAK/STAT pathway. Another potential alternative is the activation of tyrosine/serine kinase phosphatases by BK. This mechanism may directly oppose some of the protein tyrosine/ serine kinase paths activated by AT1R. These alternative mechanisms in sum are potentially responsible for the diversion in signal transduction between these two receptors. Regardless of the route of action, our results suggest that in Rat-1 fibroblasts stably transfected with BKB2R, BK slightly decreases connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) mRNA level while in ATIR transfected cells Ang II increases CTGF mRNA markedly. To determine whether mutant hybrids can be formed between these two receptors which encompass some of the function of the donor receptor but bind the ligand of the recipient receptor, a series of hybrids were formed with BKB2R the recipient and AT1R the donor receptor. Some of these hybrids show resistance to exchanges with the AT1R and form receptors which either do not bind (IC1 exchanges) or demonstrate poor function but normal internalization (proximal C-terminus exchanges). However, other hybrids have proven very functional. For example, the IC2, IC3 and distal C-terminus of the BKB2R IC face can be replaced simultaneously with the AT1R resulting in an hybrid which binds BK, continues to signal, is internalized and resensitized. Formation of this and other less extensive hybrids is discussed. Some of these hybrids possess the capacity to function as the AT1R as exemplified by their ability to upregulate CTGF expression as wild-type (WT) AT1R.     

Characterization of two polyclonal peptide antibodies that recognize the carboxy terminus of angiotensin II AT1A and AT1B receptors

1. The differential identification of the angiotensin AT1A and AT1B receptor subtypes is impaired by the existing>96% homology of both receptors. In the present study, we characterized two polyclonal rabbit peptide antibodies, namely alpha-AT1A and alpha-AT1B, that recognize the C-terminal region of mouse AT1A and AT1B receptors, respectively. 2. In immunoblotting, both antibodies detected two major AT1 receptor-specific bands at sizes of 72.5 and 87.6 kDa in mouse tissues and in Neuro-2a cell lysates. In immunohistochemistry, antibodies demonstrated AT1 receptor-specific staining in renal proximal and distal tubules, as well as in kidney glomeruli. In addition, both antibodies stained AT1 receptors in Neuro-2a cells with G-protein receptor typical distribution. Dot-blot and ELISA analysis of the alpha-AT1A antibody showed 2.5- to fourfold higher selectivity for its AT1A receptor target peptide (1A-PEP) compared with the non-specific AT1B receptor peptide (1B-PEP). In contrast, the alpha-AT1B antibody showed high binding affinity towards its target peptide 1B-PEP, but also demonstrated high cross-reactivity for the non-specific peptide 1A-PEP (1.4- to twofold in ELISA and dot-blot analysis). In contrast with the lack of recognition by the alpha-AT1B antibody, the alpha-AT1A antibody selectively recognized the AT1A receptor fused to red fluorescence protein in transiently transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. 3. In summary, we have generated two new peptide antibodies to the mouse AT1A and AT1B receptors (alpha-AT1A and alpha-AT1B), of which the alpha-AT1A antibody has the capability to distinguish AT1A receptor types in immunological approaches.     

Angiotensin II stimulates superoxide production via both angiotensin AT1A and AT1B receptors in mouse aorta and heart

The present study was conducted to determine the roles of angiotensin AT(1A) and AT(1B) receptors in angiotensin II-induced superoxide anion production in mouse aorta and heart. Superoxide anion production in aorta was determined by the lucigenin chemiluminescence method, and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in heart tissues were measured by biochemical assay. The basal production rate of superoxide anion in aorta of wild type (WT) mice was significantly higher than in angiotensin AT(1A) receptor knockout (AT(1A) KO) mice. Angiotensin II (2.8 mg/kg/day, s.c. for 13 days) significantly increased superoxide anion production in aorta of both AT(1A) KO and WT mice. However, the superoxide anion production rate in aorta of angiotensin II-infused AT(1A) KO mice was significantly lower than in angiotensin II-infused WT mice. Valsartan (40 mg/kg/day in drinking water) prevented angiotensin II-induced superoxide anion production in aorta of WT and AT(1A) KO mice. Similarly, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances levels in heart tissues of angiotensin II-treated WT and AT(1A) KO mice were significantly higher than those in vehicle-infused WT and AT(1A) KO mice, respectively. Valsartan prevented angiotensin II-induced increases of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances levels in heart tissue of both WT and AT(1A) KO mice. These results indicate that angiotensin II stimulates superoxide anion production via both angiotensin AT(1A) and AT(1B) receptors, and that angiotensin AT(1A) receptors appear to play a predominant role in angiotensin II-induced superoxide anion production in mouse aorta and heart.     

Cardiac angiotensin II receptors are downregulated by chronic angiotensin II infusion in rats

We studied the effect of chronic (7 days) angiotensin II infusion in a subpressor (200 ng/kg per minute) dose on angiotensin II receptors in the left ventricle in rats. Infusion of angiotensin II caused an elevation in systolic blood pressure after 3 days, usually to values of about 150 mmHg, and the increase continued during the drug administration. The number of angiotensin II type 1 and angiotensin II type 2 receptors was significantly decreased by 20-30% in the angiotensin II-infused left ventricular membranes without affecting the affinity. Thus, these data suggest that angiotensin II may regulate the number of its own receptors in rat left ventricles.     

Design, synthesis, and incorporation of a beta-turn mimetic in angiotensin II forming novel pseudopeptides with affinity for AT1 and AT2 receptors

A benzodiazepine-based beta-turn mimetic has been designed, synthesized, and incorporated into angiotensin II. Comparison of the mimetic with beta-turns in crystallized proteins showed that it most closely resembles a type II beta-turn. The compounds exhibited high to moderate binding affinity for the AT2 receptor, and one also displayed high affinity for the AT1 receptor. Molecular modeling showed that the high-affinity compounds could be incorporated into a previously derived model of AT2 receptor ligands.     

Increased availability of angiotensin AT 1 receptors leads to sustained arterial constriction to angiotensin II in diabetes - role for Rho-kinase activation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Antagonists of angiotensin AT₁ receptors elicit beneficial vascular effects in diabetes mellitus. We hypothesized that diabetes induces sustained availability of AT₁ receptors, causing enhanced arterial constriction to angiotensin II.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

To assess functional availability of AT₁ receptors, constrictions to successive applications of angiotensin II were measured in isolated skeletal muscle resistance arteries (∼150 µm) of Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats and of their controls (+/Fa), exposed acutely to high glucose concentrations (HG, 25 mM, 1 h). AT₁ receptors on cell membrane surface were measured by immunofluorescence.

KEY RESULTS

Angiotensin II-induced constrictions to first applications were greater in arteries of ZDF rats (maximum: 82 ± 3% original diameter) than in those from +/Fa rats (61 ± 5%). Constrictions to repeated angiotensin II administration were decreased in +/Fa arteries (20 ± 6%), but were maintained in ZDF arteries (67 ± 4%) and in +/Fa arteries vessels exposed to HG (65 ± 6%). In ZDF arteries and in HG-exposed +/Fa arteries, Rho-kinase activities were enhanced. The Rho-kinase inhibitor, Y27632 inhibited sustained constrictions to angiotensin II in ZDF arteries and in +/Fa arteries exposed to HG. Levels of surface AT₁ receptors on cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were decreased by angiotensin II but were maintained in VSMCs exposed to HG. In VSMCs exposed to HG and treated with Y27632, angiotensin II decreased surface AT₁ receptors.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

In diabetes, elevated glucose concentrations activate Rho-kinase which inhibits internalization or facilitates recycling of AT₁ receptors, leading to increased functional availability of AT₁ receptors and sustained angiotensin II-induced arterial constriction.     

The role of bradykinin, AT2 and angiotensin 1-7 receptors in the EDRF-dependent vasodilator effect of angiotensin II on the isolated mesenteric vascular bed of the rat

1. The mechanisms involved in the vasodilator actions of angiotensin II (Ang II) have not yet been completely elucidated. We investigated the potential mechanisms that seem to be involved in the Ang II vasodilator effect using rat isolated mesenteric vascular bed (MVB). 2. Under basal conditions, Ang II does not affect the perfusion pressure of MVB. However, in vessels precontracted with norepinephrine, Ang II induces vasodilation followed by vasoconstriction. Vasoconstrictor, but not the vasodilation of Ang II, is inhibited by AT(1) antagonist (losartan). The vasodilator effect of Ang II was not inhibited by AT(2), angiotensin IV and angiotensin 1-7 receptor antagonists alone (PD 123319, divalinal, A 779, respectively). 3. The vasodilator effect of Ang II is significantly reduced by endothelial removal (deoxycholic acid), but not by indomethacin. Inhibition of NO-synthase by N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) and guanylyl cyclase by 1H-[1,2,3] oxadiazolo [4,4-a] quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ) reduces the vasodilator effect of Ang II. This effect is also reduced by tetraethylammonium (TEA) or l-NAME, and a combination of l-NAME plus TEA increases the inhibitory effect of the antagonists alone. However, indomethacin does not change the residual vasodilator effect observed in vessels pretreated with l-NAME plus TEA. 4. In vessels precontracted with norepinephrine and depolarized with KCl 25 mm or treated with Ca(2+)-dependent K(+) channel blockers (charybdotoxin plus apamin), the effect of Ang II was significantly reduced. However, this effect is not affected by ATP and voltage-dependent K(+) channel blockers (glybenclamide and 4-aminopyridine). 5. Inhibition of kininase II with captopril significantly potentiates the vasodilator effect of bradykinin (BK) and Ang II in the rat MVB. The inhibitory effect of the B(2) receptor antagonist HOE 140 on the vasodilator effect of Ang II is further enhanced by PD 123319 and/or A 779. 6. The present findings suggest that BK plays an important role in the endothelium-dependent vasodilator effect of Ang II. Probably, the link between Ang II and BK release is modulated by receptors that bind PD 123319 and A 779.     

Central inhibition of AT1receptors by eprosartan--in vitro autoradiography in the brain.

All components of the renin-angiotensin system have been demonstrated in the brain and AT1 receptors have been localized in brain areas involved in central cardiovascular regulation. It is currently unclear whether AT1 receptor antagonists, which are increasingly used in the treatment of arterial hypertension and chronic heart failure, have the potential to mediate action via the central renin-angiotensin system. Therefore, we tested the in vivo access of the non-peptide AT1 receptor antagonist, eprosartan (30 and 60 mg per kg of body weight (BW) for 4 weeks, i.p. administered by osmotic minipumps), to angiotensin II receptors in the rat brain by in vitro autoradiography with 125I- (Sar1- Ile8) angiotensin II as a ligand. Eprosartan significantly increased plasma renin activity by four-fold and six-fold at doses of 30 and 60 mg x kg(-1), respectively (P< 0.05 vs CTRL). In the brain, eprosartan produced a dose-dependent inhibition of AT receptor binding in the median cerebral artery ( 850 +/- 249 and 650 +/- 106 vs 1072 +/- 116 dpm x mm(-2) of CTRL; P< 0.05). Furthermore, eprosartan inhibited angiotensin II receptor binding in discrete brain areas, which express exclusively, or predominantly, AT1 receptors both outside and within the blood-brain barrier, such as the paraventricular nucleus ( 180 +/- 47 and 130 +/- 18 vs 545 +/- 99 dpm x mm(-2)of CTRL; P< 0.05), the subfornical organ ( 106 +/- 26 and 112 +/- 17 vs 619 +/- 256 dpm x mm(-2)of CTRL; P< 0.05), and the organum vasculosum laminae terminalis ( 461 +/- 110 and 763 +/- 136 vs 1033 +/- 123 dpmx mm(-2)of CTRL; P< 0.05). These results emphasize that eprosartan readily crosses the blood-brain barrier in vivo and selectively inhibits binding to AT1 receptors in specific brain nuclei. The modulation of central regulatory mechanisms might contribute to AT1 receptor antagonists overall therapeutic efficacy in cardiovascular disease.