Progress in living donor liver transplantation for biliary atresia and challenges faced: A thirty-year single institutional experience

BackgroundBiliary atresia (BA) is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the pediatric population, and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) have been established as a radical treatment for BA .The aim of this study was to clarify the long term outcomes and risk factors affecting the LDLT outcomes, as well as the challenges faced.MethodsBetween 1990 and 2019, 666 BA patients underwent LDLT in our institution and were enrolled in this study. Data regarding the recipient's age, anatomic findings of the biliary tree at Kasai's portoenterostomy, basic characteristics at transplantation, transplant profiles, donor characteristics, and outcomes of LDLT were analyzed.ResultsThe 1-, 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-year graft survival rates of BA patients who underwent LDLT were 88.1%, 85.4%, 81.5%, 78.9%, 76.6%, and 75.5%, respectively. The transplant era, age at transplantation, ABO incompatible transplant, and presence of pulmonary vascular complications were identified as significant risk factors for overall graft survival. When the study period was divided into the first (1990–1999) and second (2000–2019) phases and re analyzed, the outcomes of ABO-incompatible transplants and LDLT for adult BA patients remained inferior to others in the second phase. The 20-year graft survival rate in patients who underwent re transplantation in the second phase was 54.2%.ConclusionsThe outcomes of LDLT in children are generally good, but the immunosuppression procedures need to be further improved for ABO-incompatible cases in the future. Further improvements in LDLT results for adult patients and re transplantation remain challenges to be addressed in this field, and future attempts, including revision to the organ allocation system of deceased donors, are necessary.Level of evidenceLevel III (case control study).     

Living donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was originally indicated only for elective cases of pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease. In Japan, however, where liver transplantation from brain-dead donor is performed very rarely, this indication has been expanded to emergency cases such as fulminant hepatic failure (FHF). METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with FHF were treated between May 1992 and April 1999. Causes of acute liver failure were non-A, non-B hepatitis in 27 patients, hepatitis B virus in seven, and hepatitis A virus, Epstein-Barr virus, herpes simplex virus, and chrome poisoning in one each. RESULTS: Four patients did not undergo LDLT because of severe brain damage or combined multiple organ failure. The remaining 34 patients underwent a total of 36 LDLTs, including two retransplantations; 16 children received transplants of 17 lateral segments, three children and eight adults transplants of 11 left lobes, and seven adults transplants of eight right lobes. A total of 15 recipients died, four of primary graft dysfunction, three of refractory acute rejection, two of pneumonia, and one each of ductopenic rejection, sepsis, aplastic anemis, recurrence of Epstein-Barr virus hepatitis, multiple organ failure by chrome poisoning, and unknown hepatic failure. Primary graft dysfunction developed in adult recipients with small-for-size graft transplants, whereas refractory acute rejection and ductopenic rejection occurred in six grafts each of children with non-A, non-B FHF. CONCLUSIONS: LDLT can be safely expanded to cases of FHF in adult patients. Primary graft dysfunction in adult recipients with small-for-size left lobe grafts can be overcome by using right lobes. However, refractory acute rejection and ductopenic rejection in children remain a major problem.     

Predictors of clinical outcome in children undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation for acute and chronic liver disease.

The current United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy is to allocate liver grafts to pediatric patients with chronic liver disease based on the pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) scoring system, while children with fulminant hepatic failure may be urgently listed as Status 1a. The objective of this study was to identify pre-transplant variables that influence patient and graft survival in those children undergoing LTx (liver transplantion) for FHF (fulminant hepatic failure) compared to those patients transplanted for extrahepatic biliary atresia (EHBA), a chronic form of liver disease. The UNOS Liver Transplant Registry was examined for pediatric liver transplants performed for FHF and EHBA from 1987 to 2002. Variables that influenced patient and graft survival were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis of FHF and EHBA groups revealed that 5 year patient and graft survival were both significantly worse (P < 0.0001) in those patients who underwent transplantation for FHF. Multivariate analysis of 29 variables subsequently revealed distinct sets of factors that influenced patient and graft survival for both FHF and EHBA. These results confirm that separate prioritizing systems for LTx are needed for children with chronic liver disease and FHF; additionally, our findings illustrate that there are unique sets of variables which predict survival following LTx for these two groups.     

Pediatric transplantation: the Hamburg experience

BACKGROUND: Since starting our program in 1989, 455 pediatric orthotopic liver transplantations have been performed using all techniques. In April 2001, we experienced our last in-hospital death of a pediatric liver-transplant recipient. Since then, all our liver-transplant children (n=170) were able to be discharged from the hospital. The aim of this study is to analyze the actual status of pediatric liver transplantation at the University of Hamburg and to find future perspectives to improve the results after pediatric liver transplantation. METHODS: From May 4, 2001 until September 8, 2004, 22 (13%) whole organs, 18 (11%) reduced-size organs, 79 (47%) split organs, and 51 (30%) organs from living donors were transplanted into 142 patients. One hundred forty-one were primary liver transplants, 25 retransplants, 3 third, and 1 fourth liver transplants. Of the 170 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLT), 31 (18%) were highly urgent (United Network of Organ Sharing [UNOS] I). RESULTS: After 170 consecutive pediatric liver transplants, no patients died during the hospital course (100% patient survival<3 months), but overall, 5 (2.9%) recipients died during further follow-up. The 3-month and actual graft survival rates are 93% and 85%, respectively. Twenty (11.8%) children had to undergo retransplantation. However, patient survival was not sustained by longer graft survival. Analyzing our series, we see that graft survival after reduced-size liver transplantation showed a significantly lower rate versus living-donor liver transplantation. CONCLUSION: The learning curve in pediatric liver transplantation has reached a turning point where immediate patient survival is considered the rule. The challenge is to increase graft survival to the same level. The long-term management of the transplant patients, with the aim of avoiding late graft loss and achieving excellent quality of life, will become the center of the debate.     

Adult living-donor liver transplantation with ABO-incompatible grafts

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation using ABO-incompatible grafts is rarely performed because the reported outcome is poorer than with compatible grafts. We report our positive experience with adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) using ABO-incompatible grafts. METHODS: The immunosuppressive protocol consisted of plasmapheresis/intravenous immunoglobulin infusion before LDLT followed by thymoglobulin induction and splenectomy, maintenance with tacrolimus/cyclosporine (FK/CSA), mycophenolate mofetil, and a rapid steroid taper. Plasmapheresis was planned for up to 3 months after LDLT aiming at maintaining the anti-ABO titers level below 1:16. Liver biopsies were routinely stained for humoral rejection with complement 4d (C4d) and for biliary damage with cytokeratin 7. RESULTS: Between January 2003 and September 2004, five patients, mean age 59 years, received an ABO-incompatible LDLT. Patient and graft survival was 80% at mean follow-up of 43 months (range, 34-54) for the four surviving patients. One patient died 4 months after LDLT. Humoral rejection occurred in one patient whereas acute cellular rejection was diagnosed in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: ABO-incompatible LDLT can be performed with patient and graft survival similar to compatible LDLT. Minimization of immunosuppression is possible, and chronic biliary damage is not the norm. Better tools than complement 4d staining must be researched to diagnose the features of immunologic damage to the graft. If these results will be confirmed in a greater number of patients, ABO-incompatible LDLT may be proposed when ABO-compatible donors are not available or when the ABO-incompatible donor is the better candidate.     

Survival after pediatric liver transplantation: why does living donation offer an advantage?

HYPOTHESIS: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) results in improved survival compared with deceased whole and split organ transplantation in children. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of LDLT on graft and patient survival in pediatric liver transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. METHODS: Data included all pediatric recipients (aged <18 years) registered in the UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) database from October 1, 1987, to May 24, 2004. Covariates predictive of survival by univariate analyses were included in the Cox proportional hazards regression models in a blockwise fashion to determine predictors of survival. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier graft and patient survival rates were improved in LDLT recipients compared with recipients of deceased whole and split organ transplantations (P<.01). In the initial model (model P<.001), prognostic factors for graft and patient survival included recipient age, race, origin of liver disease, certain pretransplantation laboratory data, medical condition, multiorgan transplantation, retransplantation, recipient-donor ABO blood compatibility, and cold and warm ischemia times. The addition of graft type to the initial covariate set did not significantly change the model (P = .21, covariate P = .09). However, most of the positive prognostic factors identified in the model were inherent characteristics of LDLT recipients and the LDLT procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Graft and patient survival in the pediatric population is better with LDLT than deceased organ transplantation. Factors that contribute to this difference include recipients who are less ill, who have shorter cold and warm ischemia times, and those with a decreased need for retransplantation but not the type of graft per se.     

Over 500 Liver Transplants Including More Than 400 Living-Donor Liver Transplants in 2019 at Asan Medical Center

BackgroundMore than 400 liver transplants were performed at Asan Medical Center (AMC) in 2011, and over 500 liver transplants including 420 living-donor liver transplants (LDLTs) were performed in 2019. Herein, we report the methodology of these procedures.MethodsSince the first adult LDLTs at AMC using the left and right lobes were successfully performed, various innovative techniques and approaches have been developed: modified right lobe, dual graft, donor exchange for ABO incompatibility, expansion of indications and no-touch techniques for hepatocellular carcinoma, intraoperative cine-portogram and additional intervention for large collaterals, management of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and stenosis, salvage LDLT after major hepatectomy, and timely LDLT for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.ResultsFour hundred twenty LDLTs in 403 adult and 17 pediatric patients and 85 deceased-donor liver transplants in 74 adult and 11 pediatric patients were performed. The number of deceased-donor liver transplants remained constant since 2011, but the number of LDLTs increased steadily. One hundred thirty patients (25.7%) required urgent liver transplantations and 24 patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure underwent LDLT. PVT including grade 1,2,3, and 4 was reported in 91 patients (18.0%), and Yerdel’s grade 2, 3, and 4 PVT was reported in 47 patients (51.6%); all patients with PVT were successfully treated. Adult LDLTs for hepatocellular carcinoma and ABO incompatibility accounted for 52.6% and 24.3% of the cases, respectively. In-hospital mortality in 2019 was 2.97%.ConclusionContinual efforts to overcome challenging problems in LDLT with various innovations and dedication of the team members during the perioperative period to improve patient outcomes were crucial in increasing the number of liver transplantations at Asan Medical Center.     

An approach to ABO-incompatible liver transplantation in children.

Survival in ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) liver transplantation has been reported to be between 40% and 60%. Management techniques have included routine immunosuppression as well as prophylactic antilymphoblast globulin, pre- and posttransplant plasmapheresis (PLPH), and splenectomy. Over a 6-year period, 155 orthotopic liver transplants were performed in 139 pediatric patients. Seven children received an ABO-I allograft. In the latter transplants, immunosuppression consisted of triple-drug therapy (cyclosporine A, prednisone, and azathioprine) along with prospective double-volume PLPH for ABO titers (IgA and IgM) greater than or equal to 1:8. Splenectomy was not performed on any patient. One patient was refractory to PLPH and was treated with a hemofiltration system using an immunoadsorption cartridge with synthetic A group antigen. The overall survival for patients receiving ABO-I allografts was 57% (4/7), with a 67% (4/6) graft survival in those patients treated with PLPH. The graft survival for patients treated with prospective PLPH and MALG was 60% (3/5). There was a 60% incidence of rejection in those patients treated with prospective PLPH and these episodes were all mild (steroid bolus only). While ABO-I transplantation is a reasonable option in the emergency setting, further study is necessary before it should be routinely used to increase the general donor organ pool in pediatric liver transplantation.     

Management of ABO-incompatible living-donor liver transplantation: Past and present trends

Based on the concept that the liver is a “privileged organ,” which resists acute rejection, Thomas Starzl introduced liver transplantation across the ABO blood group. However, with improved survival after liver transplantation came reports of an increased incidence of acute rejection, biliary and vascular complications, and decreased survival after ABO-incompatible liver transplantation. As a result, ABO-incompatible liver transplantations are performed only in emergencies when ABO-compatible grafts are unavailable. In living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), donors are restricted to family members; therefore, breaking ABO blood group barriers becomes inevitable. This inevitable situation has forced liver transplant surgeons to exploit many innovative techniques to overcome the challenges of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation. This review looks at the history and current practices of ABO-incompatible LDLT to provide insight so that the protocol can be improved further.     

Combined liver and kidney transplantation: analysis of Padova experience

BACKGROUND/AIM: The main indications for combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) are as follows: (1) cirrhosis with renal damage dependent or not upon liver disease, (2) renal failure with dialysis and concomitant liver end-stage disease, (3) congenital diseases, and (4) enzymatic liver deficiency with concomitant renal failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate our results with CLKT both in adult and pediatric patients. METHODS: From September 1995 to September 2006, 15 CLKT (2.8%) among 541 liver transplantations included 4 pediatric patients (27%). The main indications for CLKT were hepatitis C virus (HCV) and polycystic diseases in adult patients, and primary hyperoxaluria in pediatric patients. RESULTS: The double transplantation was performed from the same donor in all cases. All adult patients received whole liver grafts, whereas 3 split transplants and 1 whole liver graft were transplanted in the pediatric patients. Median liver and kidney cold ischemia times were 468 and 675 minutes, respectively. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 1-125), the overall survival rate was 80%. Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 100% for adult CLKT, whereas they were 50% for pediatric patients. We observed only 2 cases (18%) of delayed renal function, requiring temporary hemodialysis with progressive graft improvement. There was only 1 case of kidney retransplantation due to early graft nonfunction in a pediatric patient. CONCLUSION: Although CLKT is related to major surgical risks, results after transplantation are satisfactory with an evident immunological advantage.     

Long-term graft outcome of pediatric liver transplantation in Copenhagen: analysis of the first 51 cases

BACKGROUND: Graft loss after liver transplantation remains a significant problem, especially in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to assess our initial series of pediatric liver transplantation and to identify the risk factors that influence graft outcome. METHODS: The first 51 transplantations were analyzed retrospectively. All transplantations were stratified into three groups according to graft type (full-size, reduced-size, and living-related-donor graft). Survival data of the grafts were stratified and multivariate analysis conducted with respect to preoperative and surgical factors. RESULTS: Seventeen of all the transplants were full-size grafts and 34 technical-variant grafts (27 reduced-size grafts from cadavers and 7 living-related-donor grafts). The overall graft survival rates were 65, 62 and 53% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Twenty-three of 51 grafts (45%) were lost. Poor status of the recipients (hospitalization or intensive care unit care before surgery), a retransplanted graft, and a reduced-size graft were independent risk factors for graft failure. With experience, overall graft survival has improved significantly and the differences in graft survival between graft types have disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: To improve graft survival after pediatric liver transplantation, the timely referral of potential recipients to the transplant team and employing a meticulous technique during the operation, particularly for the technical-variant graft, are required.     

Living-related liver transplantation in pediatric patients

INTRODUCTION: Many developments in surgical technique, immunosuppression, and patient selection criteria have led to improved long-term patient and graft survival in pediatric patients receiving liver transplants. In this study, we examined the early results of 26 pediatric recipients who underwent 26 liver transplantations between January 2003 and December 2004 at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The most common indications for liver transplantation were cholestasis in 10 patients (38.5%) and Wilson's disease in 8 (30.8%). Other indications were fulminant hepatic failure (4 patients, 15.4%), tyrosinemia (2 patients, 7.7%), Caroli disease (1 patient, 3.8%), and cryptogenic cirrhosis (1 patient, 3.8%). One recipient with Byler disease and two with tyrosinemia also had incidental hepatocellular carcinoma. RESULTS: Of 26 patients, 24 (92.3%) underwent living-related liver transplantation and 2 (7.7%) underwent cadaveric transplantation. The medical records of all patients were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-two of 26 survived with excellent graft function, showing 91.2%, 86.4%, and 81.6% at 3, 12, and 24 months graft and patient survival rates, respectively. Sixteen patients (61.5%) developed various morbidities with biliary and vascular complications being the most common. Four patients (15.3%) developed bile leaks. Four patients (15.3%) developed hepatic artery thromboses. Five patients (19.2%) developed life-threatening infections. Four patients (15.4%) died during the study period, three owing to infectious complications. The other patient died due to acute respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSION: Despite technical difficulties and a donor organ shortage, the results of liver transplantation in pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease have demonstrated promising results at our institution.     

Feasibility of Auxiliary Partial Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Fulminant Hepatic Failure as an Aid for Small-for-Size Graft: Single Center Experience

Auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) or heterotopic auxiliary partial liver transplantation (HAPLT) was initially indicated for potentially reversible fulminant hepatic failure (FHF). We started auxiliary partial living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for FHF in February 2002. Since then, 5 FHF patients (3 females and 2 males) underwent auxiliary partial LDLT: 3 cases of APOLT and 2 cases of HAPLT. All of them received a small-for-size graft: graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) ≤ 1.0%. The etiologies of FHF were hepatitis B virus (HBV) in 1, Wilson's disease in 1, and unknown origin in 3 cases. Three were the acute type and 2 the subacute type of FHF. Median age was 45 years (range, 14-54 years). Blood type was identical in all cases. A left lobe graft was used in 4 instances and a right lobe graft in 1 case. Median GRWR was 0.74 (range, 0.42-0.85). Median follow-up was 42 months (range, 3 days to 70 months). Three of 5 patients (60%) were alive (at 42, 67, and 70 months) and 1 was free of immunosuppression after sufficient recovery of the native liver. Two cases succumbed: 1 at postoperative day 3 because of cytomegalovirus pneumonia and 1 at 10 months after APOLT because of sepsis. Complications were seen in all 5 patients: Relaparotomy for hemostasis in 3, decompression surgery of the abdominal cavity in 1, rehepaticojejunostomy in 1, and biliary strictures in 2 cases. Auxiliary partial LDLT may be a choice as an aid for a small-for-size graft in FHF.     

Liver and Intestine Transplantation in the United States, 1997–2006

Liver transplantation in 2006 generally resembled previous years, with fewer candidates waiting for deceased donor liver transplants (DDLT), continuing a trend initiated with the implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Candidate age distribution continued to skew toward older ages with fewer children listed in 2006 than in any prior year. Total transplants increased due to more DDLT with slightly fewer living donor liver transplants (LDLT). Waiting list deaths and time to transplant continued to improve. In 2006, there also were fewer DDLT for patients with MELD <15, fewer pediatric Status 1A/B transplants and more transplants from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors. Adjusted patient and graft survival rates were similar for LDLT and DDLT. This article also contains in-depth analyses of transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recipients with HCC had lower adjusted 3-year posttransplant survival than recipients without HCC. HCC recipients who received pretransplant ablative treatments had superior adjusted 3-year posttransplant survival compared to HCC recipients who did not. Intestinal transplantation continued to slowly increase with the largest number of candidates on the waiting list since 1997. Survival rates have increased over time. Small children waiting for intestine grafts continue to have the highest waiting list mortality.     

Auxiliary Partial Orthotopic Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Kyoto University Experience

Auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) was initially indicated as a potentially reversible fulminant hepatic failure and non-cirrhotic metabolic liver disease to compensate for enzyme deficiency without complete removal of the native liver. We expand our indication of APOLT for small-for-size grafts to support the function of implanted grafts during the early post-operative period, and for ABO-incompatibility to sustain a patient's life if the patient has a graft failure. We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients undergoing APOLT from living donor. The indication of APOLT was fulminant hepatic failure in 6, non-cirrhotic metabolic liver disease in 6, small-for-size grafts in 13 and ABO-incompatible cases in 6. The cumulative survival rate for APOLT at 1 and 5 years was 57.9% and 50.6%, and 78.8% and 73.8% for standard LDLT. None of the patients who underwent transplantation with APOLT for fulminant hepatic failure had long-term patient survival. The incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in APOLT (58.1%) than standard LDLT (35.0%). Biliary complication was higher and the need for retransplantation was greater in APOLT than standard LDLT (p < 0.01). The results suggest that the indications of APOLT should be reconsidered in view of the risk for complications and retransplantation.     

Clinical study of 18 pediatric cadaveric renal transplantations: organ sharing in pediatric renal transplantation after enforcement of the organ transplant law in Japan

Renal transplantation is considered to be the optimal replacement therapy for children with end-stage renal disease. However, the number of pediatric renal transplants in Japan is much lower than in the USA and/or Europe. Since October 1997, pediatric(< 15 years) recipients are given priority over adult recipients for organ sharing, only if one or two HLA-DR antigen(s) are matched between the recipient and pediatric(< 15 years) donor. However, the number of pediatric transplants is not increasing. One hundred and twenty-four pediatric renal transplantations were performed in Tokyo Women's Medical University between 1983 and 1999, of which 18(14.5%) were cadaveric transplants and the others (106, 85.5%) were living-related transplants. We examined 18 pediatric cadaveric renal transplantations. Seven patients received their graft from pediatric donors less than 15 years of age and 11 from adult donors. The mean age at transplantation was 13.2 years (range 4.5-18.7 years). Major etiologies of renal disease are hereditary renal disease(38.8%), chronic glomerulonephritis(33.3%), and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis[FSGS] (16.7%). Zero matches in HLA-DR locus were observed in 72.2%. Patient survival rate was 100%. Graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years after transplantation were 83% and 64% successively. There was no significant difference between the graft survival of cadaveric and living-related transplantation at 1 and 5 years. All 5 patients who received their graft between 1994 and 1998 have maintained normal graft function. Causes of their graft loss were chronic rejection in 3, recurrence of FSGS in 2, primary non-function in 1, and graft thrombosis in 1. Donor age and HLA-DR mismatching did not affect the outcome. We propose that pediatric renal grafts should be provided to children with priority, regardless of their HLA-A, B and HLA-DR matching.     

Split-liver transplantation eliminates the need for living-donor liver transplantation in children with end-stage cholestatic liver disease

BACKGROUND: End-stage cholestatic liver disease (ESCLD) is the main indication for liver replacement in children. Pediatric cadaver-organ-donor shortage has prompted the most important evolutions in the technique of liver transplantation, in particular living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and split-liver transplantation (SLT). METHODS: Between November 1997 and June 2001, 127 children with ESCLD were evaluated for liver transplantation, and 124 underwent 138 liver transplantations after a median time of 40 days. Causes of liver disease were congenital biliary atresia (n=96), Alagille's syndrome (n=12), Byler's disease (n=8), and other cholestatic diseases (n=8). RESULTS: Ninety (73%) patients received a split-liver graft, 28 (23%) a whole liver, and 6 (4%) a reduced-size liver. Overall 2- and 4-year patient survival rates were 93% and 91%, respectively; the 2- and 4-year graft-survival rates were 84% and 80%, respectively. In split-liver recipients, 4-year patient and graft-survival rates were 91% and 83%, respectively; these were 93% and 78%, respectively, in whole-liver recipients and 67% and 63%, respectively, in reduced-size liver recipients. Retransplantation rate was 11%, whereas mortality rate was 8%. Overall incidence of vascular and biliary complication were 16% and 27%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SLT can provide liver grafts for children with ESCLD with an outcome similar to the one reported following LDLT, eliminating mortality while they are on a transplantation wait list. The need for pediatric LDLT should be reevaluated and programs of SLT strongly encouraged and supported at a national and international level.     

Live donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure

BACKGROUND: Acute liver failure (ALF) carries a high mortality unless urgent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is performed on time. Live donors are utilized to treat this irreversible condition first in pediatric cases and then in adults. Herein, we aimed to report our experience with live donors for ALF in a country of a deceased donor organ donation rate is only 1.5 per million people. METHODS: Among the 245 live donor liver transplantations (LDLT) performed from June 1999 to December 2005, 14 of them (6%) were performed for ALF in 8 pediatric and 6 adult cases. Right lobes were harvested for the adult cases whereas left lateral segments were harvested for pediatric cases, except one child transplanted with a right lobe graft. The etiology of the disease was; acute hepatitis B in four cases, hepatitis A in three cases, Wilson disease two cases, autoimmune hepatitis in two cases, and was unknown in three cases. RESULTS: Three-year graft and patient survival is 79% for these series. Five of the six adult patients and six of the eight pediatric cases survived after transplantation. There was not any donor mortality or major morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: LDLT offers a safe and effective modality of treatment for ALF for both pediatric and adult patients to overcome the problem of organ shortage especially in countries where the chance of receiving an organ from a deceased donor is low.     

Excellent Long-term Outcome of ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Japan

Owing to the severe shortage of cadaveric grafts in Japan, we have performed ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation since 1989. This study assessed short- and long-term outcomes in 441 patients who received ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplants between January 1989 and December 2001. We compared our results with historical data from 1055 recipients of living kidney transplantation. Overall patient survival rates 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 years after ABO-incompatible transplantation were 93%, 89%, 87%, 85%, and 84%, respectively. Corresponding overall graft survival rates were 84%, 80%, 71%, 65%, and 59%. After ABO-incompatible transplantation, graft survival rates were significantly higher in patients 29 years or younger than in those 30 years or older and in patients who received anticoagulation therapy than in those who did not receive such therapy. There were no significant differences between A-incompatible and B-incompatible recipients with respect to clinical outcomes. The graft survival rate at 1 year in the historical controls was slightly but not significantly higher than that in our recipients of ABO-incompatible transplants. We conclude that long-term outcome in recipients of ABO-incompatible living kidneys is excellent. Transplantation of ABO-incompatible kidneys from living donors is a radical, but effective treatment for end-stage renal disease.     

Long-term results of pediatric renal transplantation at one center in Turkey

Kidney transplantation is more frequently indicated in children than in adults because growth retardation is an additional problem associated with chronic kidney disease in the pediatric age group. This study retrospectively analyzed the data from 75 kidney transplantations performed on 73 children (38 male and 35 female) at a center in Turkey from late 1975 through 2003. The aim of the study was to investigate the case characteristics and the long-term outcomes in this patient group. Patient ages ranged from 8 to 16 years (mean, 14.9 +/- 2.2 years). Sixty (82.1%) children were on hemodialysis, and 12 (16.4%) on peritoneal dialysis prior to transplantation. Pre-emptive transplantation was performed for one (1.4%) patient. Fifty-nine transplantations used organs from live donors (78.7%) and 16 cadaver transplants (21.3%). The mean cold ischemia time for the cadaveric transplantations was 38.6 hours (range, 23-56 hours). All recipients were placed on a low-dose immunosuppressive regimen. One graft was lost due to hyperacute rejection. Twenty-one patients (28.8%) experienced a total of 24 acute rejection episodes. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 190 months (mean, 44.1 +/- 31.8 months). Concerning postoperative complications, four patients (5.5%) developed a lymphocele; there were two cases each (2.7% each) of distal ureteral stricture, perirenal hematoma, or renovascular stenosis; and one patient (1.4%) developed a urine leakage. Two patients (2.7%) developed Kaposi's sarcoma at 17 and 3 months after transplantation. Six recipients died (mortality 8%), four of whom had a functioning graft. Two patients (2.7%) underwent retransplantation at 4 and 2 years after the initial operation. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates for living-related transplantations were 92%, 81%, and 70%, and the corresponding patient survival rates were 98%, 93%, and 92%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates for cadaveric transplantations were 90%, 78%, and 68%, and patient survival rates 98%, 91%, and 90%, respectively. These results indicate that kidney transplantation is successful in pediatric end-stage renal disease patients particularly from living-related donors.