锯叶棕果实提取物治疗BPH引起的下尿路症状疗效观察

目的:探讨锯叶棕果实提取物治疗BPH引起的下尿路症状的疗效。方法:采用锯叶棕果实提取物单药治疗30例前列腺增生伴下尿路症状患者8周,分别比较患者治疗前后的最大尿流率、前列腺体积、剩余尿量、IPSS评分及QOL评分的变化情况。结果:治疗8周后,患者的最大尿流率、剩余尿量、IPSS评分及QOL评分均有明显改善,前列腺体积则无明显变化。所有患者均无明显不良反应。结论:锯叶棕果实提取物能有效改善BPH患者的下尿路症状。     

他达拉非治疗继发于良性前列腺增生下尿路症状的研究进展

他达拉非作为新一代的选择性磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂(PDE5Is)为男性勃起功能障碍(ED)的治疗带来了全新的理念。继发于男性良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的下尿路症状(LUTS)由于其病因的复杂性,治疗效果受到多因素的影响,使得传统的临床治疗方法不可避免地存在各种难以预测的并发症。目前日益受到关注的他达拉非每日一次口服方案(OAD)治疗ED的新方案在临床研究中表现出了对继发于BPH的LUTS的显著的疗效,在治疗的早期,国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)就得以显著改善。还有研究表明在同时存在ED和LUTS症状的BPH患者中,他达拉非也显著有效。本文旨在回顾PDE5Is对BPH相关症状治疗的相关研究进展,综述他达拉非治疗继发于BPH的LUTS的有效性和安全性证据。     

他汀类药物的使用与良性前列腺增生和下尿路症状相关性的临床研究

目的:探讨服用他汀类药物是否可延缓良性前列腺增生(BPH)和下尿路症状的临床进展。方法:选择2003年1月至2008年12月于我院体检中心体检的50~69岁男性作为研究对象,制定纳入标准,随访5年,通过比较IPSS评分、最大尿流率(Qmax)和前列腺体积(PV)探讨他汀类药物的使用与前列腺增生和下尿路症状临床进展的相关性。结果:总共有653例男性纳入本研究,其中他汀类药物使用组(1组)283例,他汀类药物未使用组(2组)370例,两组入选时的年龄、IPSS评分、Qmax和PV差异均无显著性(P0.05),随访过程中因出现明显的排尿困难各剔除24例(1组)和35例(2组)。5年随访过程中1组和2组的IPSS评分都逐渐升高,但1组升高程度明显低于2组(P0.01),1组和2组的Qmax都逐渐下降,但1组下降程度明显低于2组(P0.01);1组[PV5年分别为(22.60±4.99)、(25.80±5.20)、(27.92±5.05)、(29.11±5.24)、(29.97±5.26)ml]和2组[5年分别为(24.30±4.98)、(28.50±5.14)、(32.84±4.77)、(36.99±4.78)、(40.90±4.78)ml]的PV都逐渐增大,但1组增大程度明显小于2组(P0.01)。结论:使用他汀类药物可明显延缓BPH和下尿路症状的临床进展,且长时间服用疗效更显著。     

Clinical guidelines for male lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia

The present article is the abbreviated English translation of the Japanese guidelines for male lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia updated as of the end of 2016. The target patients are men aged >50 years complaining of lower urinary tract symptoms, with or without benign prostatic hyperplasia, and the target readers are non‐urological general physicians and urologists. Mandatory assessment for general physicians is medical history, physical examination, urinalysis and measurement of serum prostate‐specific antigen. Additional mandatory assessment for urologists is symptoms and quality of life assessment by questionnaires, uroflowmetry, residual urine measurement, and prostate ultrasonography. Nocturia requires special attention, as it can result from nocturnal polyuria and/or sleep disturbance rather than lower urinary tract disorders. Functional lower urinary tract disorders with or without benign prostatic hyperplasia are primarily managed by conservative therapy and medications, such as α₁‐blockers and phosphodiesterase‐type 5 inhibitors. Use of other medications or combination pharmacotherapy is to be reserved for urologists. 5α‐Reductase inhibitors and anticholinergics or β3 agonists are indicated for men with enlarged prostates and overactive bladder symptoms, respectively. Surgical intervention for bladder outlet obstruction is considered for persistent symptoms or benign prostatic hyperplasia‐related comorbidities. Surgical modalities should be optimized by the patient's characteristics, performance of equipment and the surgeon's experience.     

Influence of hypertension on lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia

AIM: To clarify the influence of hypertension on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) we examined the relationship between blood pressure, LUTS, and the effect of terazosin on LUTS in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: The subjects were patients who had LUTS and BPH. They were treated with terazosin (1 mg, twice-a-day) for 12 weeks. Calculation of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), measurement of blood pressure, and uroflowmetry were performed before and after 12 weeks of therapy. Patients were divided into a normotensive (NT) group and a hypertensive (HT) group at the time of first examination. RESULTS: The IPSS for urinary frequency and nocturia in BPH-HT patients (n = 21; mean age, 71 years) were significantly higher than those in the BPH-NT patients (n = 21; mean age, 69 years) before the administration of terazosin. The total IPSS the BPH-HT patients was also significantly higher than that of the BPH-NT patients. There were no differences of uroflowmetric parameters between the two groups. After 12 weeks of therapy, systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased in the BPH-HT patients, but not in the BPH-NT patients. However, the systolic pressure of the BPH-HT patients was still significantly higher than that of the BPH-NT patients. The score for each IPSS parameter decreased in both groups, but the difference of the score between the two groups increased. CONCLUSION: Hypertension may worsen LUTS and may decrease the improvement of symptoms by terazosin.     

Relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms and serum levels of sex hormones in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

Study Type – Aetiology (case series)
Level of Evidence 4

OBJECTIVES

To investigate a possible association between the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and the serum levels of sex hormones in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that underwent surgery for severe benign prostatic obstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 127 selected men with symptomatic BPH attending our urology clinic were recruited. The clinical conditions of BPH were assessed by digital rectal examination, serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) determination, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), transrectal ultrasonography and maximum urinary flow rate (Q_max) value at uroflussimetry. Before surgery, we measured the serum concentrations of total testosterone (TT) and free testosterone (FT), oestradiol, prolactin, luteinizing hormone and follicle‐stimulating hormone. We excluded men with endocrine diseases, those with prostate disease who were receiving antiandrogen therapy and those with psychological diseases. The relationships between the IPSS score and serum sex hormone levels were determined.

RESULTS

The final study population consisted of 122 men (mean age of 70.66 years), as five were excluded (three due to incomplete evaluation and two who were diagnosed with prostate cancer). On statistical analysis, the total IPSS was significantly associated with age (r= 0.405, P < 0.001) and TT (r= 0.298, P= 0.020) but not with FT or the serum levels of the other sex hormones. The serum levels of testosterone and IPSS did not correlate with prostate volume and Q_max. PSA level and age correlated with prostate volume (r= 0.394, P < 0.001; r = 0.374, P < 0.001, respectively). We distinguished two subgroups of patients: the first group of 40 men with an IPSS of <19 and the second group of 82 with an IPSS of >19, and we evaluated the median levels of TT in each group. There was an increased risk of LUTS in men with a greater serum concentration of TT (P= 0.042), although the mean TT level was in the normal range.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, the severity of LUTS was associated with age and serum levels of TT but only age correlated with the measures of BPH, especially prostate volume. The potential effects of testosterone on LUTS may well be indirect. Additional large studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results.     

Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin hydrochloride compared to doxazosin in the treatment of Indonesian patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia

AIM: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin hydrochloride and doxazosin in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: The safety and efficacy of tamsulosin (0.2 mg) and doxazosin (2 mg) was determined after once daily administration for 6 weeks in an open-label, randomized, multicenter study of 101 men with BPH. The International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), maximal urinary flow rates (Qmax), average urinary flow rates (Qave) and residual urine were determined at baseline and again at 6 weeks as efficacy parameters. The primary parameters used for safety evaluation were vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate) and adverse events. The number of patients with a clinically significant response to treatment with tamsulosin or doxazosin was determined and defined as those with >20% improvement from the baseline Qmax or >20% decrease in total IPSS. RESULTS: The total IPSS decreased significantly in both the tamsulosin and doxazosin groups compared to baseline. There was a significant difference in the decrease in total IPSS between two groups. Qmax, Qave and residual urine significantly improved only in the tamsulosin group. There were no significant differences in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure or heart rate profile in the tamsulosin group; however, doxazosin resulted in a significant difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Tamsulosin was well tolerated; only three patients (6%) in the tamsulosin group reported an adverse event (dizziness) while 11 patients (22%) in the doxazosin group reported an adverse event (dizziness), one of whom withdrew from the study. CONCLUSIONS: Tamsulosin was shown to be more effective than doxazosin in the treatment of LUTS due to BPH.     

Comparison of 25 and 75 mg/day naftopidil for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A prospective, randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: The present study investigated the efficacy, safety, and utility of starting an alpha(1d)-selective antagonist, naftopidil, at 75 or 25 mg/day in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: In this prospective comparative study, the subjects comprised 153 patients with LUTS associated with BPH. Patients were randomized to receive either 25 mg/day (Group LD) or 75 mg/day (Group HD) of naftopidil for 4 weeks. The lower urinary tract disease symptom score (LUTDSS), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the Quality of life assessment index, the maximum flow rate (Q(max)), and the residual urine volume were compared between the groups. RESULTS: In both groups, the LUTDSS and the IPSS were significantly improved at the endpoint and no significant intergroup differences were identified. However, the improvement in the Q(max) was significantly better for Group HD than for Group LD. The overall efficacy did not differ significantly between the groups. The degree of improvement in voiding symptoms and LUTDSS among patients with moderate symptoms was significantly greater for Group HD than for Group LD. The frequency of adverse reactions did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Starting administration at 75 mg/day rather than 25mg/day is helpful for LUTS associated with BPH for patients with moderate symptoms, particularly in improving voiding symptoms. The 75 mg/day administration was considered to be a recommendable therapeutic dose in some patients.     

Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review

Study Type – Therapy (systematic review)
Level of Evidence 1a What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors improve lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), however the maximum urinary flow rate is not significantly affected. Also, the underlying mechanism of action of these drugs on LUTS is not well understood. This systematic review confirms the findings of the individual studies included; however the high heterogeneity between them precluded meta‐analysis and further recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

? To review the evidence in support of the effectiveness of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

? Relevant studies were identified by performing a literature search using MEDLINE® and The Cochrane Library®. The criteria used during the search included randomized, placebo‐controlled trials of treatment for LUTS secondary to BPH using the International Prostate Symptom Score as an outcome measure.

RESULTS

? Four trials that included a total of 1928 patients met the inclusion criteria. All four studies showed a statistically significant difference in the International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life and erectile function in favour of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors. ? No study showed a statistically significant improvement of the maximum urinary flow. ? Meta‐analysis of the results was not possible because of heterogeneity across the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

? Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors used in the clinical setting can significantly improve LUTS secondary to BPH, erectile function and quality of life. Maximum urinary flow improvement is not statistically significant. ? Future research should focus on pathophysiological principles and cost analysis.     

Short‐term effects of crossover treatment with silodosin and tamsulosin hydrochloride for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of silodosin and tamsulosin in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by a randomized crossover method. Methods: BPH patients with the complaint of LUTS were included in this study, and were randomly divided into two groups: a silodosin‐preceding group (4 weeks of twice‐daily administration of silodosin at 4 mg, followed by 4 weeks of once‐daily administration of tamsulosin at 0.2 mg) or a tamsulosin‐preceding group (4 weeks' administration of tamsulosin, followed by 4 weeks' administration of silodosin). No drug withdrawal period was provided when switching the drug. Results: In the first treatment period, both drugs significantly improved the International Prostate Symptom Score total score, but the improvement by silodosin was significantly superior to that by tamsulosin. After crossover treatment, significant improvement was observed only with silodosin treatment. Moreover, intergroup comparison of changes revealed that silodosin showed significant improvement of straining and nocturia with first and crossover treatments, respectively, compared with tamsulosin. Silodosin also significantly improved quality of life (QOL) score in both treatment periods, while tamsulosin significantly improved QOL score only in the first treatment period. The most frequent adverse drug reaction was ejaculatory disorder with silodosin; however, the incidence of dizziness with silodosin was similar to that with tamsulosin. Conclusions: In BPH/LUTS patients, silodosin exhibits excellent efficacy in improving subjective symptoms in both initial and crossover treatment, and it appears to improve the QOL of patients.     

Significant intravesical prostatic protrusion and prostatic calcification predict unfavorable outcomes of medical treatment for male lower urinary tract symptoms

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) and prostatic calcification on medical treatment for male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).Materials and methodsMen over the age of 40 years with total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 8 were recruited from January to August 2013. The maximal flow rate, postvoiding residual (PVR) urine volume, total prostate volume (TPV), transitional zone volume (TZV), transitional zone index (TZI), and grades of IPP and prostate calcification were recorded. All patients received α-blocker monotherapy, and Global Response Assessment (GRA) was used to determine treatment response 1 month after the treatment. The primary end point was to compare the treatment results in patients with and without significant IPP or prostate calcification. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether IPP and prostatic calcification are predictors of improved outcome (GRA ≥ 1).ResultsWe enrolled 112 men with a mean age of 65.5 (range, 42–89) years. IPP was significantly positively correlated with TPV, TZV, TZI, and PVR. Prostatic calcification was significantly negatively correlated with total IPSS, IPSS Voiding, and IPSS Storage. After 1-month treatment with α-blockers, the average total IPSS decreased from 18.2 ± 7.4 to 13.1 ± 4.5. Sixty-nine patients (61.6%) reported improved outcomes. Patients with large prostate volumes (TPV ≥ 40 mL) and small prostate volumes (TPV < 40 mL) had similar improved outcome rates (56.5% and 65.1%, respectively). Patients with significant IPP (Grades II and III) had significantly lower improved outcome rates (36.8%) than those without significant IPP (74.3%). Patients with prostatic calcification also had a significantly lower rate of improved outcome (47.9%) than those who did not (71.9%). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that IPP and prostatic calcification are predictors of unfavorable outcome (GRA < 1) after adjusting for age, TPV, and total IPSS.ConclusionSignificant IPP and prostatic calcification are unfavorable predictors of successful α-blocker treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia-induced male LUTS.     

Outcomes and complications of naftopidil versus tamsulosin for elderly men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the outcomes and complications of naftopidil in treating elderly men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia and compared them with those administered with tamsulosin. A literature review was performed to identify the available randomised controlled trials concerning the comparison between naftopidil and tamsulosin for men with LUTS/BPH. We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Library Database, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Eleven publications involving 1,114 men (557 in the naf group and 557 in the tam group) were pooled in our analysis. We found no significant differences in the total IPSS, IPSS storage score, IPSS voiding score, quality of life index, peak urinary flow rate, average flow rate and post-void residual volumes. We assessed cardiovascular and sexual adverse events, acute urinary retention, surgical intervention, withdrawals due to any reason and withdrawals due to adverse events. The incidence of adverse events was similar among patients in naf and tam groups. In conclusion, naftopidil shared comparable efficacy and similar incidence of adverse events with tamsulosin and appears to be a promising agent for and alternative to tam. However, more prospective trials with high quality and long-term treatment duration are needed to verify this observation.