Effects of the long acting beta agonist formoterol on asthma control in asthmatic patients using inhaled corticosteroids. The Netherlands and Canadian Formoterol Study Investigators

BACKGROUND: The long acting beta 2 agonist formoterol has proved to be an effective bronchodilator with a prolonged action of 12-14 hours. However, the precise role of formoterol in the maintenance treatment of asthma is still under debate. A study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with formoterol for six months in subjects with asthma. METHODS: In a multicentre double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study 239 subjects with mild to moderate asthma were randomly assigned to treatment with either inhaled formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily (n = 125) or placebo (n = 114) during eight months. The study consisted of a four week run in period, a 24 week treatment period, and a four week washout period. All subjects were using regular inhaled corticosteroids (100-3200 micrograms daily) but were still needing at least five inhalations of short acting beta 2 agonist per week for symptom relief. The study was performed in 10 outpatient clinics in Canada, and five outpatient clinics and one coordinating centre for 44 Dutch general practitioners in The Netherlands. Twice daily self-reported peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements, symptom scores, and rescue beta 2 agonist use during the last 28 treatment days compared with baseline values were used as main outcome measures. Spirometric values were measured at entry, at the start of treatment, after four, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, and after four weeks washout. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty five subjects received formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily via Turbohaler and 114 received placebo. Baseline FEV1 was 67.1% predicted and mean bronchodilator reversibility was 26%. The mean total asthma symptom score was 3.6 (maximum possible 21). A significant decrease in symptoms in favour of formoterol (difference from placebo -0.64, 95% CI -0.04 to -1.23, p = 0.04) was observed. Compared with placebo, morning PEF increased (difference from placebo 28 l/min, 95% CI 18.3 to 37.7, p = 0.0001) and the use of short acting beta 1 agonists decreased (daytime difference from placebo -1.1 inhalation, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.7, p = 0.0001) in the formoterol group. PEF returned to baseline following discontinuation of formoterol, as did asthma symptom scores. Thirty three patients treated with formoterol and 32 treated with placebo required treatment with prednisolone during the study (58 and 55 courses, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adding formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily by Turbohaler to inhaled corticosteroids was effective in improving symptom scores and morning PEF, and decreasing the use of rescue beta 2 agonists. There was no apparent loss of asthma control during 24 weeks of treatment with formoterol.


     

Twelve month comparison of salmeterol and salbutamol as dry powder formulations in asthmatic patients. European Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Salmeterol is a potent selective beta 2 agonist that has been shown to have a duration of action in excess of 12 hours. In this study salmeterol and salbutamol were compared over a three month period with a further extension of nine months. METHODS: Three hundred and eighty eight patients with mild to moderate reversible airways obstruction (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) > 50% predicted) were randomised to receive salmeterol (50 micrograms) twice daily or salbutamol (400 micrograms) four times daily, both by dry powder, in a double blind parallel group study. During the first three months detailed assessment of efficacy was made with recording of morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates (PEF), asthma symptoms, and bronchodilator use when necessary for the relief of symptoms. Patients continued in the study for a further nine months with the salbutamol dose reduced to 400 micrograms twice daily. Lung function was measured at the clinic and safety data were collected during this period. RESULTS: Salmeterol produced a significantly higher mean morning PEF (mean difference compared with salbutamol 21 (95% CI 12-31) l/min), and a significant reduction in mean diurnal variation in PEF (from 30 l/min at baseline to 11 34 l/min at baseline to 32 l/min during salbutamol treatment). Salmeterol also reduced day and night symptoms and use of rescue bronchodilator. FEV1 increased with both salmeterol and salbutamol treatment over the 12 month treatment period. For both treatments the number of patients reporting exacerbations of asthma and the frequency of these exacerbations remained constant during the study. Thirty six patients in the salmeterol and 49 in the salbutamol group withdrew during the 12 months of the study. CONCLUSIONS: In this study salmeterol (50 micrograms twice daily) was more effective than salbutamol (400 micrograms four times daily) in the control of asthma over three months, and more effective than salbutamol (400 micrograms twice daily) over a further nine months. Neither salmeterol nor salbutamol was associated with any worsening of control of asthma.     

Long term clinical comparison of single versus twice daily administration of inhaled budesonide in moderate asthma.

BACKGROUND--Inhaled steroids are widely used in the treatment of mild to moderate asthma. However, long term compliance with inhaled steroids is poor and administration of a single daily dose may improve compliance. METHODS--A double blind, randomised study was performed to determine whether inhaled steroids given once daily at bedtime are as efficacious as a twice daily regimen in the long term maintenance of moderate asthmatic patients. Forty adults of mean age 37 years with moderate asthma (mean (SE) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 73.6 (1.4)% predicted, mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 328 l/min) were randomised to receive either a twice daily dose (400 micrograms morning and bedtime) of inhaled budesonide (group A) or a once daily dose of 800 micrograms (group B) and were followed for a period of 12 months. Asthma symptom scores (assessed according to a modified Borg scale), inhaled beta 2 agonist consumption, and peak expiratory flow rates were recorded daily. Spirometry and airways responsiveness to methacholine (PC20) were measured at the end of each period of three months of treatment. RESULTS--There was no difference between the two groups at baseline and during the follow up period in the PC20 for methacholine. However, a difference was seen between the two groups in the mean daily number of beta 2 agonist inhalations (1.4 (0.1) puffs/patient/day in group A v 2.3 (0.1) in group B), the PEF variability (episodes of decrease in PEF of > 20%) (0.22 (0.01) episodes/patient/day in group A v 0.40 (0.02) in group B), and for asthma symptom scores (0.30 (0.04) in group A v 0.42 (0.06) in group B) for the 12 month period of the study. CONCLUSIONS--Although both regimens provide good clinical control, twice daily doses of 400 micrograms inhaled budesonide are more effective than a single dose of 800 micrograms at bedtime in the long term control of stable moderate asthma.     

Use of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with mild asthma.

A double blind, parallel group study was carried out to investigate the effect of inhaled budesonide in a moderate (200 micrograms) and a low (100 micrograms) twice daily dosage compared with the effect of placebo in 103 adults with mild symptomatic asthma. Subjects recorded peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and beta 2 agonist consumption at home for a period of seven weeks (a one week run in and six weeks' treatment). Morning baseline PEF (around 80% of predicted normal) increased non-significantly to 88% with 200 micrograms budesonide daily and to 90% (p less than 0.05) with 400 micrograms, compared with 81% with placebo. Evening PEF (around 94% of predicted normal) did not change significantly with active or placebo treatment. By comparison with placebo, there was a significant decrease in nocturnal asthma symptoms and beta 2 agonist consumption. The changes during the day were less pronounced and significant only for 400 micrograms budesonide daily. No significant differences between the two active treatments were detected. It is concluded that low doses of inhaled budesonide are effective in patients with mild symptomatic asthma, particularly for night time symptoms and early morning lung function. The early introduction of inhaled corticosteroids for patients with mild asthma and night time symptoms may improve their quality of life during the night and early morning.     

Decreased bronchodilating effect of salbutamol in relieving methacholine induced moderate to severe bronchoconstriction during high dose treatment with long acting β2 agonists

BACKGROUND: In vitro the long acting beta2 agonist salmeterol can, in contrast to formoterol, behave as a partial agonist and become a partial antagonist to other beta2 agonists. To study this in vivo, the bronchodilating effect of salbutamol was measured during methacholine induced moderate to severe bronchoconstriction in patients receiving maintenance treatment with high dose long acting beta2 agonists. METHODS: A randomised double blind crossover study was performed in 19 asthmatic patients with mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 88.4% predicted and median concentration of methacholine provoking a fall in FEV1 of 20% or more (PC(20)) of 0.62 mg/ml at entry. One hour after the last dose of 2 weeks of treatment with formoterol (24 microg twice daily by Turbuhaler), salmeterol (100 microg twice daily by Diskhaler), or placebo a methacholine provocation test was performed and continued until there was at least a 30% decrease in FEV1. Salbutamol (50 microg) was administered immediately thereafter, followed by ipratropium bromide (40 microg) after a further 30 minutes. Lung function was monitored for 1 hour after provocation. RESULTS: There was a significant bronchodilating and bronchoprotective effect after 2 weeks of active treatment. The dose of methacholine needed to provoke a fall in FEV1 of > or = 30% was higher after pretreatment with formoterol (2.48 mg) than with salmeterol (1.58 mg) or placebo (0.74 mg). The difference between formoterol and salmeterol was statistically significant: 0.7 doubling dose steps (95% CI 0.1 to 1.2, p=0.016). The immediate bronchodilating effect of subsequently administered salbutamol was significantly impaired after pretreatment with both drugs (p<0.0003 for both). Three minutes after inhaling salbutamol the increase in FEV1 relative to the pre-methacholine baseline was 15.8%, 7.3%, and 5.5% for placebo, formoterol and salmeterol, respectively (equivalent to increases of 26%, 14%, and 12%, respectively, from the lowest FEV1 after methacholine). At 30 minutes significant differences remained, but 1 hour after completing the methacholine challenge FEV1 had returned to baseline values in all three treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Formoterol has a greater intrinsic activity than salmeterol as a bronchoprotective agent, indicating that salmeterol is a partial agonist compared with formoterol in contracted human airways in vivo. Irrespective of this, prior long term treatment with both long acting beta2 agonists reduced the bronchodilating effect of an additional single dose of salbutamol equally, indicating that the development of tolerance or high receptor occupancy overshadowed any possible partial antagonistic activity of salmeterol. Patients on regular treatment with long acting beta2 agonists should be made aware that an additional single dose of a short acting beta2 agonist may become less effective.     

Time course and duration of bronchodilatation with formoterol dry powder in patients with stable asthma.

BACKGROUND--Formoterol, a new beta 2 agonist, is long and fast acting when given as an aerosol. The aim was to determine the onset and duration of bronchodilatation with formoterol as a dry powder compared with salbutamol dry powder and with placebo. METHODS--Fifteen patients with stable asthma with a reversibility of 15% or more participated in a double blind, within patient study. On five different days the patients received formoterol 6 micrograms, 12 micrograms, or 24 micrograms, salbutamol 400 micrograms, or placebo in random order. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was measured 10 minutes before, 30 minutes after, and then every hour for up to 12 hours after treatment. Specific airway resistance (sRaw) and specific airway conductance (sGaw) were measured immediately before and one, three, five, 10, 15, and 30 minutes after treatment. RESULTS--Formoterol 12 micrograms and 24 micrograms caused bronchodilatation as rapidly as salbutamol 400 micrograms. Peak values were not significantly different in the active treatments. The duration of action, calculated as median time with 20% or more of the maximum achieved increase in FEV1, was sustained for 9 hours and 16 minutes with salbutamol 400 micrograms, for 9 hours and 45 minutes with formoterol 6 micrograms, for 11 hours and 22 minutes with formoterol 12 micrograms, and for 11 hours and 42 minutes with formoterol 24 micrograms. CONCLUSIONS--Formoterol as a dry powder at doses of 12 micrograms and 24 micrograms produces a rapid onset of action and has a bronchodilator effect comparable with salbutamol 400 micrograms as a dry powder. The bronchodilatation was sustained for 11-12 hours. Formoterol 6 micrograms caused similar bronchodilatation but more slowly and for a shorter time.     

Salmeterol, a new long acting inhaled beta 2 adrenoceptor agonist: comparison with salbutamol in adult asthmatic patients.

Salmeterol is a new inhaled beta 2 adrenoceptor agonist, which has been shown in animal experiments to produce a more prolonged bronchodilator effect than currently available beta 2 adrenoceptor agonists. It was studied in eight adult asthmatic patients. Each patient received on separate test days salbutamol 200 micrograms and salmeterol 50, 100, and 200 micrograms according to a randomised, double blind, crossover design. FEV1, peak expiratory flow (PEF), heart rate, blood pressure, and tremor were recorded in the clinic for six hours after drug inhalation; PEF was recorded for a further six hours at home. All three doses of salmeterol produced peak increases in FEV1 (mean 0.5-0.8 l) and PEF (71-100 l/min) similar to those produced by salbutamol 200 micrograms (0.5 l and 74 l/min). After salbutamol FEV1 and PEF had returned to baseline within six hours, but after all three doses of salmeterol more than half of the maximum bronchodilator effect remained after 12 hours. The effects of salbutamol and the two lower doses of salmeterol (50 and 100 micrograms) on cardiovascular measurements and on tremor were similar, whereas after salmeterol 200 micrograms there was a small decrease in diastolic blood pressure and an increase in heart rate and tremor. Thus inhaled salmeterol has a long acting bronchodilator action in asthmatic patients. This effect may be of value in the treatment of asthma, particularly in patients with nocturnal symptoms.     

Efficacy of inhaled salmeterol in the management of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a single centre randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study.

BACKGROUND--The acute response to bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is modest; it has, however, been suggested that these patients may benefit from long term treatment. METHODS--To investigate the efficacy of salmeterol in smokers with moderate to severe COPD a double blind, randomised, crossover comparison was performed between salmeterol (50 micrograms twice daily) and placebo in 63 patients with stable COPD (mean age 65 years). Prior to inclusion, all patients had a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of < 60% of predicted and an improvement in FEV1 of < 15% following 400 micrograms inhaled salbutamol. Patients received four weeks of therapy with each of the treatment regimens. Assessment of efficacy was made with recording of morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates (PEF), respiratory symptoms, and use of rescue salbutamol. FEV1 was measured before and after nebulised salbutamol prior to randomisation and at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS--Morning PEF values were higher during the salmeterol than during the placebo period, although the mean treatment difference was small (12 l/min (95% confidence limits 6 to 17)). No difference in mean evening PEF values was found. Diurnal variation in PEF, assessed as the difference between the morning PEF and that of the previous evening, was more pronounced during the placebo than during the salmeterol period. The mean spirometric values (including reversibility in FEV1) obtained at the end of the two treatment periods were similar. Compared with placebo, treatment with salmeterol was associated with lower daytime and night time symptom scores and less use of rescue salbutamol both during the day and the night. The patients rated the treatment with salmeterol better than treatment with placebo. CONCLUSIONS--This study shows that, compared with placebo, treatment with salmeterol produces an improvement in respiratory symptoms and morning PEF values in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Treatment with long acting beta agonists may therefore result in an improvement in functional status, even in patients suffering from apparently nonreversible obstructive pulmonary disease.     

Twice daily beclomethasone dipropionate administered with a concentrated aerosol inhaler: efficacy and patient compliance.

The efficacy of twice daily inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate administered by a concentrated aerosol inhaler (one puff twice daily-500 micrograms/day) has been compared with that of treatment four times daily with a standard dose inhaler (two puffs four times daily-400 micrograms/day) in 21 patients with stable asthma. Double placebo inhalers were used in a randomised crossover fashion during two four week treatment periods. Mean peak expiratory flow (PEF), mean symptom scores, and number of extra salbutamol inhalations required were not significantly different between the two treatment periods. Local side effects were more common during treatment with the four times daily active preparation; overt oropharyngeal candidiasis, however, was not found in either group during the study. On completion of the crossover study patients were transferred to the twice daily regimen. At the three month follow up all patients had remained stable and the outpatient PEF was significantly higher (mean 382 (SD 26)l min-1) than at entry into the trial (mean 345 (24)l min-1) (p less than 0.05). Twice daily beclomethasone administered by a concentrated aerosol inhaler appears to be as effective as the standard four times daily regimen in controlling stable asthma.     

Time course of bronchodilating effect of inhaled formoterol, a potent and long acting sympathomimetic.

BACKGROUND: Most of the currently available inhaled beta 2 agonists are short acting bronchodilators. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of onset and duration of the bronchodilating activity of formoterol and salbutamol. METHODS: Fourteen patients with reversible airways obstruction received placebo, 200 micrograms salbutamol, and 12, 24, and 48 micrograms formoterol from a metered dose inhaler, according to a double blind, randomised crossover design. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and specific airways conductance (sGaw) were measured over 12 hours. RESULTS: Salbutamol and all doses of formoterol caused a significant and substantial increase in sGaw one minute after inhalation. The mean maximum increase in FEV1 was 58% (8%) after 200 micrograms salbutamol compared with 63% (11%), 62% (10%), and 74% (10%) after 12, 24, and 48 micrograms formoterol, respectively. The mean maximum increase in FEV1 occurred 57 (12) minutes after administration of salbutamol compared with 137 (16), 141 (21), and 161 (33) minutes after 12, 24, and 48 micrograms formoterol respectively. The bronchodilating effect of salbutamol did not differ from placebo after six hours. In contrast, the mean increase in FEV1 12 hours after 12 micrograms formoterol (26% (8%) of baseline) significantly exceeded the change after placebo. Tremor was recorded in four patients after 48 micrograms formoterol. CONCLUSION: Formoterol is a potent, fast acting bronchodilator with a long duration of action.     

Validation of an asthma quality of life diary in a clinical trial.

BACKGROUND--Quality of life (QOL) is commonly measured in asthma clinical trials by a questionnaire given before and after treatment. A structured asthma QOL daily diary provides more restricted information but on a daily basis. The validity and use of such a QOL diary was examined in a clinical trial in which two asthma treatments were compared. METHODS--The effects of low dose inhaled steroid (400 micrograms beclomethasone dipropionate, BDP) combined with the long acting beta 2 agonist salmeterol (100 micrograms) (n = 220) was compared with high dose inhaled steroid (1000 micrograms BDP) (n = 206) in asthmatic outpatients in a double blind, parallel group study. Outcome measures consisted of a combined diary for peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate, symptoms, and problems, and an asthma-specific QOL questionnaire, the Living with Asthma Questionnaire. RESULTS--The QOL diary correlated with the QOL questionnaire for both cross sectional and longitudinal assessments. Cross sectional correlations with PEF were higher for the QOL questionnaire than the QOL diary, but longitudinal correlations with PEF were higher for the diary than the questionnaire. Treatment with low dose steroid/salmeterol compared with high dose steroid produced better lung function, better QOL as measured by diary, and reduced night time wakenings, but treatment differences were not obtained with the QOL questionnaire nor for daytime symptoms. Diary assessed QOL was a better predictor of low PEF than diary assessed symptoms. Compliance with diary completion was good but there were floor or ceiling effects in the QOL diary records of about 25% of patients. CONCLUSIONS--Structured QOL diaries are valid instruments that appear to be more responsive to longitudinal change in clinical trials than a QOL questionnaire, but QOL questionnaires provide a more sensitive cross sectional measure of disease severity. Floor and ceiling effects are found in some patients' QOL diaries which limit their usefulness. QOL diary problem events occur during the troughs of a peak flow graph, while symptoms are more widely distributed with respect to peak flow.     

Asthma control during long term treatment with regular inhaled salbutamol and salmeterol

BACKGROUND: The adverse effects of long term treatment of asthma with the short acting beta agonist fenoterol have been established in both epidemiological and clinical studies. A study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy and safety of long term treatment with salbutamol and salmeterol in patients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma. METHODS: In a two centre double dummy crossover study 165 patients were randomly assigned to receive salbutamol 400 micrograms q.i.d., salmeterol 50 micrograms b.i.d., or placebo via a Diskhaler. All patients used salbutamol as required for symptom relief. The study comprised a four week run in and three treatment periods of 24 weeks, each of which was followed by a four week washout. Asthma control was assessed by measuring mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), a composite daily asthma score, and minor and major exacerbation rates. Washout assessments included methacholine challenge and bronchodilator dose response tests. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: Data from 157 patients were analysed. Relative to placebo, the mean morning PEFR increased by 30 l/min (95% CI 26 to 35) for salmeterol but did not change for salbutamol. Evening PEFR increased by 25 l/min (95% CI 21 to 30) and 21 l/min (95% CI 17 to 26), respectively (p < 0.001). Salmeterol improved the asthma score compared to placebo (p < 0.001), but there was no overall difference with salbutamol. Only daytime symptoms were improved with salbutamol. The minor exacerbation rates were 0.29, 0.88, and 0.97 exacerbations/patient/year for salmeterol, salbutamol and placebo, respectively (p < 0.0001 for salmeterol). The corresponding major exacerbation rates were 0.22, 0.51 and 0.40, respectively (p < 0.03 for salmeterol). For salbutamol the asthma score deteriorated over time (p < 0.01), and the time spent in major exacerbation was significantly longer compared with placebo (12.3 days (95% CI 4.2 to 20.4) versus 8.4 days (95% CI 5.2 to 11.6), p = 0.02). There was no evidence of rebound deterioration in asthma control, lung function, or bronchial hyper-responsiveness following cessation of either active treatment, and no evidence of tolerance to salbutamol or salmeterol. CONCLUSIONS: Regular treatment with salmeterol is effective in controlling asthma symptoms and reduces minor more than major exacerbation rates. Salbutamol was associated with improved daytime symptoms but subtle deterioration in asthma control occurred over time. Salbutamol should therefore be used only as required.     

Peak flow variation in childhood asthma: correlation with symptoms, airways obstruction, and hyperresponsiveness during long term treatment with inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for asthma management focus on treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and on home recording of peak expiratory flow (PEF). The effect of maintenance treatment with inhaled corticosteroids on PEF variation and its relation to other parameters of disease activity were examined in 102 asthmatic children aged 7-14 years. METHODS: During 20 months of treatment with inhaled salbutamol, with or without inhaled budesonide (600 micrograms daily), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the dose of histamine required to provoke a fall in FEV1 of more than 20% (PD20), the percentage of symptom free days, and PEF variation were assessed bimonthly. PEF variation was computed as the lowest PEF as a percentage of the highest PEF occurring over 14 days, the usual way of expressing PEF variation in asthma self-management plans. For each patient using inhaled corticosteroids within subject correlation coefficients (rho) were computed of PEF variation to the percentage of symptom free days, FEV1, and PD20. RESULTS: PEF variation decreased significantly during the first two months of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and then remained stable. The same pattern was observed for symptoms and FEV1. In contrast, PD20 histamine continued to improve throughout the whole follow up period. In individual patients predominantly positive associations of PEF variation with symptoms, FEV1, and PD20 were found, but the ranges of these associations were wide. CONCLUSIONS: During treatment with inhaled corticosteroids the changes in PEF variation over time show poor concordance with changes in other parameters of asthma severity. When only PEF is monitored, clinically relevant deteriorations in symptoms, FEV1, or PD20 may be missed. This suggests that home recording of PEF alone may not be sufficient to monitor asthma severity reliably in children.     

Corticosteroids in acute severe asthma: effectiveness of low doses.

BACKGROUND: Although the need for corticosteroids in acute severe asthma is well established the appropriate dose is not known. METHODS: The response to intravenous hydrocortisone 50 mg (low dose), 100 mg (medium dose), and 500 mg (high dose), administered every six hours for 48 hours and followed by oral prednisone, was compared in patients with acute asthma in a double blind randomised study. After initial emergency treatment with bronchodilators subjects received oral theophylline or intravenous aminophylline and nebulised salbutamol four hourly. Patients were given low, medium, or high doses of intravenous hydrocortisone and then 20, 40, or 60 mg/day respectively of oral prednisone with a reducing regimen over the following 12 days. Beclomethasone dipropionate, 400 micrograms twice daily by metered dose inhaler, was also started. Peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and visual analogue dyspnoea scores (VAS) were recorded daily in hospital and PEF and VAS twice daily after discharge for a total of 12 days. RESULTS: The 66 subjects (40 female) who completed the study had a mean (SD) age of 31(14) years. On presentation mean (SD) FEV1% predicted in the low (n = 22), medium (n = 20), and high dose (n = 24) groups was 17(13), 19(12), and 19(11) and after emergency bronchodilator treatment 32(20), 30(12), and 36(13). After 24 hours of treatment the respective post-bronchodilator FEV1% predicted values were 62(22), 62(23), and 65(28) compared with 71(24), 69(22), and 71(24) after 48 hours. No significant difference between the groups was detected. PEF and VAS improved with treatment over the 12 days but was not influenced by steroid dose. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrocortisone 50 mg intravenously four times a day for two days followed by low dose oral prednisone is as effective in resolving acute severe asthma as 200 or 500 mg of hydrocortisone followed by higher doses of prednisone.     

Platelet activation during exercise induced asthma: effect of prophylaxis with cromoglycate and salbutamol.

Peak expiratory flow (PEF) and plasma concentrations of platelet factor 4 and beta thromboglobulin were measured before and after exercise in nine asthmatic patients and 12 non-asthmatic volunteers. Exercise was preceded by administration in random order of either placebo, salbutamol 200 micrograms, or sodium cromoglycate 2 mg from a pressurised inhaler. In control subjects there were minimal changes in PEF and plasma concentrations of platelet factor 4 and beta thromboglobulin. In the asthmatic patients the typical changes in PEF were seen on exercise; plasma concentrations of platelet factor 4 and beta thromboglobulin rose significantly in parallel, the rise preceding the fall in PEF. The changes in peak flow and platelet activation induced by exercise were attenuated by prior administration of salbutamol or cromoglycate. These results indicate that exercise induced asthma is associated with a rise in platelet release products similar to that observed in antigen induced asthma.     

Cross tolerance to salbutamol occurs independently of beta2 adrenoceptor genotype-16 in asthmatic patients receiving regular formoterol or salmeterol

BACKGROUND: The development of tolerance following the use of long acting beta(2) agonists in asthmatic patients with either the homozygous arginine (Arg-16) or glycine (Gly-16) genotypes is poorly documented, especially in relation to the acute reliever response to salbutamol in constricted airways. A study was undertaken to evaluate the Arg-16 and Gly-16 genotypes for the acute salbutamol response following methacholine bronchial challenge between the first and last doses of formoterol (FM) and salmeterol (SM) combination inhalers. METHODS: Parallel groups of 10 matched homozygous Arg-16 and 10 homozygous Gly-16 patients completed a randomised, double blind, double dummy, crossover study. Following a 1 week washout period, patients received treatment for 2 weeks with either inhaled budesonide (BUD) 200 micro g + FM 6 micro g (two puffs twice daily) or inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 micro g + SM 50 micro g (one puff twice daily). After washouts and randomised treatments (1 hour after the first and last inhalation) a methacholine challenge was performed followed by salbutamol 200 micro g, with recovery over 30 minutes (the primary outcome). RESULTS: Washout values for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), methacholine hyperreactivity, and salbutamol recovery were similar for both treatments and genotypes. Pre-challenge FEV(1) values for both genotypes did not differ significantly between the first and last doses of each treatment. Salbutamol recovery as mean (SE) area under the 30 minute time-response curve was significantly delayed (p<0.05) equally in both genotype and treatment groups. There were no differences in salbutamol recovery in either genotype or treatment group. CONCLUSION: Acute salbutamol recovery in methacholine constricted airways was significantly delayed to a similar degree in both genotypes due to cross tolerance induced by FM or SM.     

Nedocromil sodium in adults with asthma dependent on inhaled corticosteroids: a double blind, placebo controlled study.

Eighty nine adults with asthma who were receiving inhaled corticosteroid and bronchodilator treatment took part in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial of nedocromil sodium, 4 mg four times daily by inhalation. During a run in period of two to four weeks corticosteroid treatment was reduced when possible to produce a comparable level of symptoms across the trial population. The test treatment was then taken for four weeks, with the severity of asthma recorded daily by patients and assessed at two weekly hospital visits. There was an improvement in symptoms in the patients taking nedocromil sodium by comparison with those having the placebo, the differences being significant for diary card PEF readings, asthma symptom scores, and bronchodilator usage at night. The mean difference between the two groups was 18 l/min for PEF, 0.42 for daytime asthma score, and 1.73 puffs in 24 hours for bronchodilator usage. These results suggest that asthmatic patients who require inhaled steroids show better control of their asthma with the addition of nedocromil sodium than of placebo over a four week period after reduction of the dosage of their inhaled steroids.     

Addition of salmeterol versus doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate in patients with mild to moderate asthma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the addition of salmeterol with that of doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate in asthmatic patients not controlled by a low or intermediate dose of inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: After a four week run in period of treatment with fluticasone propionate (100 micrograms twice daily if pre-trial dose was 400-600 micrograms inhaled corticosteroids or 250 micrograms twice daily if pre-trial dose was 800-1200 micrograms inhaled corticosteroids), 274 patients were randomised to treatment for 12 weeks with either salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily plus the run in dose of fluticasone propionate or twice the run in dose of fluticasone propionate (200 or 500 micrograms twice daily). Outcome measures were daily records of peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom scores, and clinic lung function. RESULTS: The improvements in both the morning and evening PEF were better in the salmeterol than in the fluticasone propionate group, the mean increase in morning PEF being 19 l/min higher (95% CI 11.0 to 26.1) and in evening PEF being 16 l/min (95% CI 18.4 to 24.0) higher in the salmeterol group. The increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 0.09 1 greater in the salmeterol group than in the fluticasone propionate group after four weeks of treatment (95% CI 0.01 to 0.18), but not after 12 weeks. Both regimens showed an increase in symptom free days and a reduction in the need for rescue salbutamol both during the day and the night, but these improvements were greater in the salmeterol group. There were no significant differences between the groups in adverse effects or in the number of rescue course of oral corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients still symptomatic despite 100 or 250 micrograms fluticasone propionate twice daily, the addition of salmetterol caused a greater improvement in lung function and symptom control than doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate.     

Corticosteroids and inhaled salbutamol in patients with reversible airway obstruction markedly decrease the incidence of bronchospasm after tracheal intubation

BACKGROUND: In patients with bronchial hyperreactivity, airway instrumentation can evoke life-threatening bronchospasm. However, the best strategy for the prevention of bronchospasm has not been defined. Therefore, in a randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled study, the authors tested whether prophylaxis with either combined salbutamol-methylprednisolone or salbutamol alone (1) improves lung function and (2) prevents wheezing after intubation. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with partially reversible airway obstruction (airway resistance > 180%, forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] < 70% of predicted value, and FEV1 increase > 10% after two puffs of salbutamol), who were naive to anti-obstructive treatment, were randomized to receive daily for 5 days either 3 x 2 puffs (0.2 mg) of salbutamol alone (n = 16) or salbutamol combined with methylprednisolone (40 mg/day orally) (n = 15). Lung function was evaluated daily. Another 10 patients received two puffs of salbutamol 10 min before anesthesia. In all patients, wheezing was assessed before and 5 min after tracheal intubation. RESULTS: Within 1 day, both salbutamol and salbutamol-methylprednisolone treatment significantly improved airway resistance (salbutamol, 4.3+/- 2.0 [SD] to 2.9+/-1.3 mmHg x s x l(-1); salbutamol-methylprednisolone, 5.5+/-2.9 to 3.4+/-1.7 mmHg x s x l(-1)) and FEV1 (salbutamol, 1.79+/-0.49 to 2.12+/-0.61 l; salbutamol-methylprednisolone, 1.58+/-0.66 to 2.04+/-1.05 l) to a steady state, with no difference between groups. However, regardless of whether single-dose salbutamol preinduction or prolonged salbutamol treatment was used, most patients (8 of 10 and 7 of 9) experienced wheezing after intubation. In contrast, only one patient receiving additional methylprednisolone experienced wheezing (P = 0.0058). CONCLUSIONS:: Pretreatment with either salbutamol alone or salbutamol combined with methylprednisolone significantly and similarly improves lung function within 1 day. However, only combined salbutamol-methylprednisolone pretreatment decreases the incidence of wheezing after tracheal intubation. Therefore, in patients with bronchial hyperreactivity, preoperative treatment with combined corticosteroids and salbutamol minimizes intubation-evoked bronchoconstriction much more effectively than the inhaled beta2-sympathomimetic salbutamol alone.     

Early asthma control and maintenance with eformoterol following reduction of inhaled corticosteroid dose

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated the benefits of adding long acting beta(2) agonists to inhaled corticosteroids in the maintenance treatment of moderate to severe asthma. The effects of adding eformoterol to corticosteroids on asthma control and exacerbations in patients with mild to moderate asthma were studied. METHODS: After a run in period of 7-14 days on existing medication, 663 symptomatic patients were randomised to receive budesonide Turbohaler 400 microg twice daily together with either eformoterol Turbohaler 9 micro g (delivered dose) or placebo twice daily. After 4 weeks patients whose asthma was well controlled (n=505) were re-randomised to receive budesonide 400 microg daily and either eformoterol 9 micro g or placebo twice daily for a further 6 months. RESULTS: Patients receiving eformoterol achieved asthma control 10 days sooner than those receiving budesonide alone, and improvements in lung function, symptoms, quality of life, and relief beta(2) agonist use were significantly greater with eformoterol. During the 6 month follow up the frequency of mild exacerbations was significantly lower in the eformoterol group than in those receiving budesonide alone (7.2 versus 10.5 per patient, 95% confidence interval for ratio 0.49 to 0.96, p=0.03). The time to first day of poorly controlled asthma was 97 days in the eformoterol group compared with 42 days in the placebo group (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Adding eformoterol to a low or moderate dose of budesonide in mild asthma resulted in faster and more effective control than treatment with budesonide alone. Eformoterol allowed the corticosteroid dose to be reduced while also decreasing the rate of mild exacerbations compared with budesonide alone. These data suggest a therapeutic advantage of adding eformoterol to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with mild to moderate asthma.