Large pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery: role of echocardiography in diagnosis and management

We performed M-mode and two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiograms prospectively in 140 patients an average of eight days after open heart surgery. Large pericardial effusions occurred in 13 patients; three had complete circumcardiac pericardial effusion, four had local anterior adhesions, five had extensive anterior adhesions (posterior loculated effusion), and one had a large loculated pericardial effusion contiguous to the right atrium. In five patients with tamponade, the effusion was drained, with immediate reversal of symptoms and signs of tamponade. In the other eight patients, who had no deterioration in cardiovascular status, the effusion was not drained; instead, these patients were treated medically with indomethacin and observed with serial echocardiograms, and the effusions eventually disappeared. The most consistent echocardiographic differences between the five patients with and the eight patients without tamponade were that patients with tamponade had larger posterior pericardial effusions, more severe left atrial compression, and more indentation of the right atrial wall. Echocardiography plays an essential role in diagnosis and management of large pericardial effusions after open heart surgery. Patients with large pericardial effusions who are clinically stable need only medical management, including serial echocardiograms, but drainage is indicated if the cardiovascular or respiratory status worsens. Certain echocardiographic findings indicate a high probability of tamponade.     

Incidental massive pericardial effusion diagnosed by myocardial perfusion imaging

A report on an unusual case of pericardial effusion and tamponade that was found incidentally on myocardial perfusion imaging. This was later confirmed by echocardiography and subsequently treated with pericardiocentesis. Two-dimensional echocardiography is still the "gold standard" for diagnosing pericardial effusion. Nuclear cardiac imaging will probably never have a primary role in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion. However, it may be helpful when the diagnosis of pericardial effusion has not been considered and when this condition is suggested by nuclear imaging findings. The echocardiogram underestimated the amount of pericardial effusion compared to myocardial perfusion imaging in this case, and in contrast to previous published reports. Further, prospective studies need to focus on the sensitivity and specificity of sestamibi nuclear scans in the qualitative and quantitative assessment of pericardial effusions.     

A rare case of massive pericardial effusion secondary to hypothyroidism

Massive pericardial effusions secondary to hypothyroidism are rarely seen in the emergency department (ED). The case of a patient presenting with a relatively asymptomatic massive pericardial effusion due to hypothyroidism is described. The patient had a history of laryngeal carcinoma post-total laryngectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy 12 years previous. Although underlying malignancy was in the differential diagnosis, hypothyroidism was diagnosed through a detailed history and physical examination, thereby avoiding the need for pericardiocentesis. Thyroid replacement alone is sufficient for resolution of these effusions, although it may take many months. Pericardiocentesis is indicated only if cardiac tamponade develops. This rare but significant condition should be considered, especially when it occurs after acute cold exposure.     

Toxoplasma pericarditis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

Large pericardial effusions are now a well-known complication of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, mainly caused by mycobacterial disease. However, other etiologies can be found. We report a case of toxoplasma pericarditis without other parasitic localizations. Pericarditis is a very uncommon clinical feature during toxoplasmosis. Its diagnosis is often difficult to establish, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Nevertheless, its possible evolution to constriction or tamponade requires its consideration. New methods of rapid tissue cultures may be helpful and allow early specific treatment.     

Chronic Pericardial Disease in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Longitudinal Study

We have reviewed the clinical and investigative findings in13 patients with chronic pericardial disease and seropositiverheumatoid arthritis. In eleven cases the diagnosis was madeon clinical grounds, while the diagnosis was confirmed onlyat post-mortem in two patients. Pleural effusions were present in seven patients, while pulsusparadoxus was found in only one case. Echocardiograms were undertakenin ten patients and all showed evidence of pericardial effusions,which were usually small and sited posteriorly. A delayed ventricularfilling pattern indicating abnormal ventricular relaxation wasseen in two patients with cardiac tamponade. The surviving 11patients were reviewed a median of three years after diagnosisof their pericardial disease. Pericardectomy had been performedin six, all of whom were asymptomatic and had a normal chestradiograph. Steroids alone had been given to the other five,and three of these remained dyspnoeic with cardiomegaly. The Clinical features distinguishing chronic pericardial diseasefrom other causes of right heart failure in rheumatoid arthritispatients are subtle. As management is fundamentally different,serious consideration should be given to the diagnosis of chronicpericardial disease in any patient with rheumatoid arthritiswho presents with right-sided heart failure.     

Chronic pericardial disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal study

We have reviewed the clinical and investigative findings in 13 patients with chronic pericardial disease and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. In eleven cases the diagnosis was made on clinical grounds, while the diagnosis was confirmed only at post-mortem in two patients. Pleural effusions were present in seven patients, while pulsus paradoxus was found in only one case. Echocardiograms were undertaken in ten patients and all showed evidence of pericardial effusions, which were usually small and sited posteriorly. A delayed ventricular filling pattern indicating abnormal ventricular relaxation was seen in two patients with cardiac tamponade. The surviving 11 patients were reviewed a median of three years after diagnosis of their pericardial disease. Pericardectomy had been performed in six, all of whom were asymptomatic and had a normal chest radiograph. Steroids alone had been given to the other five, and three of these remained dyspnoeic with cardiomegaly. The clinical features distinguishing chronic pericardial disease from other causes of right heart failure in rheumatoid arthritis patients are subtle. As management is fundamentally different, serious consideration should be given to the diagnosis of chronic pericardial disease in any patient with rheumatoid arthritis who presents with right-sided heart failure.     

The postpericardiotomy syndrome as a cause of pleurisy in rehabilitation patients

Pleuritic chest pain in patients on a rehabilitation unit may be caused by several conditions. We report 2 cases of postpericardiotomy syndrome (PPS) as a cause of pleuritic pain. PPS occurs in 10% to 40% of patients who have coronary bypass or valve replacement surgery. The syndrome is characterized by fever, chest pain, and a pericardial or pleural friction rub. Its etiology is believed to be viral or immunologic. The syndrome can be a diagnostic challenge, and an increase in length of hospitalization because of it has been documented. Identified risk factors for PPS include age, use of prednisone, and a history of pericarditis. A higher incidence has been reported from May through July. Many patients undergo a battery of expensive procedures before PPS is diagnosed. The pain is sharp, associated with deep inspiration, and changes with position. Pleural effusions may be present and tend to occur bilaterally. Pericardial effusions are a documented complication. A pericardial or pleural rub may be present and is often transient. Serial auscultation is important. Laboratory work provides clues with a mild leukocytosis and an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. However, this does not provide the definitive diagnosis. Cardiac enzymes are not reliably related to the syndrome. An electrocardiogram will show changes similar to those associated with pericarditis. The patient may have a fever, but it is rarely higher than 102.5 degrees F. Complications include pericardial effusions, arrhythmias, premature bypass graft closure, and cardiac tamponade. Treatment consists of a 10-day course of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.     

Hypothyroidism presenting as acute cardiac tamponade with viral pericarditis

This report describes the case of a young woman who presented to an emergency department with severe abdominal pain and shock. The patient was found to have pericardial tamponade due to a massive pericardial effusion. On further evaluation, the etiology of this effusion was considered to be secondary to hypothyroidism with concominant acute viral pericarditis leading to a fulminant tamponade. The presentation, differential diagnosis, and management of pericardial effusion and tamponade secondary to hypothyroidism and viral pericarditis are discussed. The diagnosis of hypothyroidism in conjunction with acute viral pericarditis should be considered in patients presenting with unexplained pericardial effusion and tamponade.     

A simple method for continuous pericardial drainage

Needle pericardiocentesis is performed routinely for relief of symptoms in patients with pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade. In many patients however, reaccumulation of fluid requires further aspiration or surgical drainage, occasionally as a matter of urgency. Both procedures carry significant risks which may be avoided by insertion of an indwelling catheter. The Viggo subclavian cannula proves ideal for prolonged drainage of pericardial effusions and for relief of tamponade in an emergency situation. Introduction into the pericardium is simple, safe, and can be performed quickly without specialised equipment. This procedure is described and illustrated in patients with tuberculous and rheumatoid pericarditis.     

Left ventricular apical diastolic collapse: an unusual echocardiographic marker of postoperative cardiac tamponade.

A 37-year-old woman was evaluated for signs and symptoms of cardiac tamponade 11 days after mitral valve replacement and tricuspid valve repair. The transthoracic echocardiogram showed a large, compartmentalized pericardial effusion that resulted in left ventricular apical diastolic collapse. Also noted were right ventricular posterior wall diastolic collapse and hemodynamic findings consistent with cardiac tamponade. This case highlights the atypical echocardiographic findings in patients with pericardial effusions after cardiac surgery.     

Pulse methylprednisolone therapy for impending cardiac tamponade in immunoglobulin-resistant Kawasaki disease

We describe a boy with Kawasaki disease (KD) whose clinical course was marked by a rapid improvement upon treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and oral aspirin, which – within 14 days – was followed by the development of a large pericardial effusion with symptoms of impending cardiac tamponade as part of a polyserositis syndrome (pleural effusions, ascites). Upon treatment with pulsed methylprednisolone, the pericardial and pleural effusions and ascites rapidly disappeared within 48 h. This is the first case reported with a polyserositis syndrome and impending cardiac tamponade during KD. Received: 29 December 1998 Accepted: 1 June 1999     

Hemorrhagic cardiac tamponade: a clinicopathologic correlation

Staphylococcus aureus pericarditis and recurrent episodes of hemorrhagic cardiac tamponade developed in a 31-year-old man. He later died of exsanguination and at autopsy was found to have a ruptured infective pseudoaneurysm of the aortic arch. When hemorrhagic pericardial effusions of undetermined cause are encountered, the heart and great vessels should be evaluated as potential sources of the hemorrhage.     

Purulent pericarditis misdiagnosed as septic shock

BACKGROUND: Septic shock is common, with approximately 200,000 cases recognized annually. This syndrome is so well characterized that when a patient is febrile and in shock, septic shock may be diagnosed without regard to alternative possibilities. Purulent pericarditis is a relatively rare disorder in which fever and hypotension are common. Classic signs and symptoms, such as chest pain, pericardial friction rub, pulsus paradoxus, and elevation of jugular venous pressure, are seen in only 50%. METHODS: In this report, we describe four patients in whom purulent pericarditis and pericardial tamponade was initially misdiagnosed as septic shock. During a 3-month period, three men and one woman (mean age, 44.5 years) came to Kern Medical Center with purulent pericarditis and pericardial tamponade. These cases represented 13% of patients admitted with a diagnosis of septic shock. RESULTS: All patients were bacteremic, and the classic findings of pericardial tamponade were absent or relatively subtle. Hemodynamic findings of elevated systemic vascular resistance, low cardiac output, and normal pulmonary artery occlusion pressure were critical to the diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Consideration of purulent pericarditis is important in cases diagnosed as septic shock. Clinicians should be aware that patients with purulent pericarditis may not exhibit classic signs and symptoms, and a high index of suspicion is necessary for appropriate management.     

Early diagnosis of shock due to pericardial tamponade using transcutaneous oxygen monitoring

The early diagnosis of traumatic pericardial tamponade may be difficult. The transcutaneous oxygen (PtcO2) monitor has been shown to be a useful indicator of low-flow shock. In the case presented, PtcO2 monitoring was the earliest indicator of shock due to pericardial tamponade and led to successful early therapy before other signs of physiologic decompensation were evident. In the management of acutely traumatized patients, PtcO2 monitoring is useful both in identifying patients who are in shock and in helping to guide therapy.     

Point-of-care ultrasound evaluation of pericardial effusions: does this patient have cardiac tamponade?

Detection of pericardial effusions using point-of-care focused echocardiography is becoming a common application for clinicians who care for critical patients. Identification of tamponade physiology is of great utility, as these patients require urgent evaluation and management. We describe techniques that the point-of-care clinician sonographer can use to determine the presence or absence of echocardiographic evidence of cardiac tamponade.     

Spectrum of pericardial disease: part I

Pericardial disease is a common disorder seen in varying clinical settings and may be the first manifestation of an underlying systemic disease. It may be due to multiple causes. Epidemiologic studies are lacking, and the exact incidence and prevalence are unknown. New diagnostic techniques have improved diagnosis, allowing early diagnosis and management. There are few randomized data to guide physicians in the management of pericardial diseases. Part I of our review focuses on the current state of knowledge and management of the more common pericardial diseases: acute pericarditis, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, chronic pericarditis and relapsing pericarditis.     

Traumatic pericardial tamponade: relearning old lessons.

Traumatic pericardial tamponade is a serious and rapidly fatal injury. As penetrating chest wounds are becoming more common, early diagnosis of tamponade is important so that life saving treatment can be started. The classical features of tamponade may be modified by hypovolaemia and the presence of associated injuries; acute tamponade may also be precipitated by rapid administration of large volumes of fluid. Pericardiocentesis, while sometimes life saving, is dangerous and of limited value. Echocardiography is limited by availability and operator dependence. A high degree of clinical suspicion in patients with chest injuries, together with close monitoring and reevaluation, particularly during volume replacement, is essential. Four cases are described which presented to the accident and emergency department of Glasgow Royal Infirmary, in three of which there was a significant delay in the diagnosis.     

Benign lipid envelope of the heart simulating a pericardial hematoma.

The hallmark of diagnosing a pericardial effusion by echocardiography is the presence of relatively sonolucent space outside of the cardiac structures. The location, size, mobility, and consistency of the pericardial space determined by echocardiography are considered to be reliable markers for defining pericardial processes. In certain clinical scenarios, however, it may be difficult to differentiate fluid from other pericardial processes, notably subepicardial adipose tissue. This case of a 76-year-old woman, who presented with possible cardiac tamponade after permanent pacemaker implantation, demonstrates some of the potential pitfalls in the diagnosis of pericardial space abnormalities.     

Épanchement péricardique en réanimation — critères cliniques et échographiques diagnostiques de tamponnade — indications de drainage en urgence

Cardiac tamponade, defined by acute circulatory failure secondary to compression of the heart chambers by pericardial effusion, causes obstructive shock requiring intensive care. The incidence of cardiac tamponade in the intensive care unit (ICU) is poorly documented, but pericardial effusion seems to be associated with increased mortality. Pericardial effusion may be caused by infectious, malignant, or autoimmune diseases, and occurs frequently after cardiac surgery. It may be suspected in any patient with shock and signs of right heart failure and polypnea, but echocardiography is crucial in the diagnosis as it visualizes pericardial effusion and detects poor hemodynamic tolerance with diastolic collapse of the right chambers and respiratory variation of right and left Doppler flows. Pericardial drainage, by pericardiocentesis or pericardiotomy, remains the only effective treatment in an emergency situation. Symptomatic treatments are mandatory before drainage to improve venous return despite pericardial obstruction: cautious volume expansion in documented hypovolemia, or norepinephrine, while minimizing the use of mechanical ventilation and sedation as these may increase circulatory failure and lead to cardiac arrest.