Practice locations of Texas family practice residency graduates, 1979-1987

The location of a physician's residency training is known to be a factor in selection of a practice location. In this paper, the authors analyze the practice locations of 689 family physicians who graduated from residency programs in Texas between 1979 and 1987 and who were practicing in Texas in 1988. One-third of these graduates were practicing in cities the same size as their residency program city. More than half were in counties located within 60 miles of the residency city. Both of these trends can be explained to a large degree by the fact that a high percentage of graduates remained in their residency city to practice. When these nonmobile graduates are removed from the sample, the findings show no correlation between the size of the residency city and the size of the practice city. More than two-thirds of those graduates who left their residency city were in counties beyond a 60-mile radius. Almost two-thirds were practicing in communities of less than 25,000 population. The authors conclude that state support for family practice residency training has been effective in distributing family physicians in a manner that addresses the needs of the state of Texas as a whole.     

The impact on rural New Mexico of a family medicine residency.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact on rural New Mexico of the large, decentralized University of New Mexico (UNM) family medicine residency. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted of all 317 residency's graduates from 1974 to 2004. Location of current practice was correlated with the residents' gender, ethnicity, medical school of origin, and whether most training took place in the urban program or one of three rural programs. The residency's impact on rural communities was assessed. RESULTS: There was no significant gender difference between graduates who went into urban or rural practice. Compared with non-minority graduates, a significantly greater percentage of ethnic minority graduates were in rural and urban New Mexico practices and fewer in out-of-state practices. A greater percentage of graduates who had been medical students in New Mexico practiced in both rural and urban New Mexico areas compared with graduates of out of state medical schools. Finally, a greater percentage of graduates from the three rural family medicine residencies remained in the state and practiced in rural areas compared with graduates from the urban program. The graduates' contributions to the school of medicine and to rural New Mexico are described. CONCLUSIONS: Graduates of UNM's family medicine residency have contributed significantly to the state's rural health workforce. Ethnic minority status, graduation from New Mexico's medical school, and training in one of the three rurally based residencies favored in-state and rural retention, while gender had no significant effect. The rural orientation of the residencies offered rural communities economic benefits.     

Why we should reduce family practice training to two years.

Family practice (FP) should consider decreasing its residency training from three years to two years. These are troubling times for FP. The number of U.S. medical students choosing FP has declined, FP physicians have difficulty maintaining the broad range of skills they learned in residency, and salaries have flattened. FP provides the best training for physicians who care for undifferentiated or continuity patients of all ages in an ambulatory setting. The author proposes that FP should focus its training on this large health care niche and develop a two-year curriculum that reduces inpatient and specialty rotations while increasing time in the family health center. At the same time, he recommends a third or even a fourth year of training be used to develop skills in any number of specialty areas. FP salaries are unlikely to be affected by these changes, residents would rack up less debt, and savings in society's contribution to graduate medical education would be realized. Reducing the length of FP training to two years will make FP more nimble, adaptable, and cost-effective.     

Psychosocial training in U.S. internal medicine and family practice residency programs.

PURPOSE: Competence in the psychosocial aspects of medical care is necessary for primary care physicians to function effectively. This study investigated the psychosocial training internal medicine and family practice residents receive in U.S. programs. METHODS: In 1996, program directors of all U.S. internal medicine (IM) and family practice (FP) residency programs were surveyed regarding the format, content, and quantity of psychosocial training provided in their programs, their opinions on topics related to psychosocial training, and demographics of their programs. RESULTS: The response rate was 61%. Ninety-nine percent of FP and 62% of IM program directors reported requiring at least one psychosocial training experience. Family practice programs required an average of 352 hours (SD +/- 175; range 27-2,664) of psychosocial training compared with 118 hours (SD +/- 272; range 0-1,050) for IM programs. Most IM and FP program directors expected residents to achieve at least basic competency in virtually all psychosocial topic areas; however, FP programs provided a greater range of psychosocial experiences. FP program directors most often identified psychologists and IM program directors most often identified internists as providing the most psychosocial training in their programs. Both IM and FP program directors considered lack of curricular time to be the main obstacle to development of psychosocial training. CONCLUSION: Residents' competence in psychosocial areas is important to both IM and FP program directors. However, content and time devoted to psychosocial training vary considerably both within and between program types.     

A study of the physician workforce supply for the latino population in California.

PURPOSE: To determine the physician supply during two decades to the workforce available to California Latinos from two separate training tracks at the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine (UCI)--the Fifth Pathway Program (FPP) and the traditional medical school curriculum. METHOD: In 2002, the authors compared two groups of physicians practicing in California to ascertain the percentage of Latino patients in their practices. One group had completed the FPP (n = 229) during the period 1971-1991, and UCI graduates from the same period composed the second group (n = 960). The authors also examined Latino population statistics for California communities where physicians located their practices. RESULTS: Both groups practiced in California (71.5%) and in primary care (59.9%) at the same rates. Women were underrepresented among FPP physicians (12.2% versus 33.3%). FPP physicians self-reported seeing significantly more Latino patients (14.3% versus 9.2%; P < .001). However, the groups did not significantly differ in the rates at which they practiced in communities with 40% or more Latino residents (18.1% versus 12.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Reactivating the FPP may increase the raw number of physicians in California, but two decades of this program did not recruit physicians to practice in California's Latino community at a rate much above that for traditional medical school graduates, especially for communities having the highest Latino population densities.     

The contribution of Memorial University's medical school to rural physician supply

INTRODUCTION: This study identifies the characteristics and predictors of Memorial University of Newfoundland (MUN) medical graduates working in rural Canada and rural Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). METHODS: We linked data from class lists, the alumni and postgraduate databases with the Southam Medical database to determine 2004 practice locations for MUN graduates from 1973 to 1998 (26 yr, inclusive). Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors for each outcome. RESULTS: In 2004, 167 (12.6%) MUN graduates worked in rural Canada and 81 (6.1%) MUN graduates worked in rural NL. Those who were more likely to practise in rural Canada (when compared with graduates from urban backgrounds, those who had not done any residency training at MUN or specialists, respectively) were graduates from a rural background (odds ratio [OR] 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-2.76), those who had done residency training at MUN (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.29) and family physicians (FPs)-general practitioners (GPs) (OR 6.64, 95% CI 4.31-10.23). Those who were more likely to practise in rural NL (when compared with graduates from urban backgrounds, those who had not done any residency training at MUN, specialists or non-Newfoundlanders, respectively) were graduates from a rural background (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.57-4.11), those who had done residency training at MUN (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.94-8.76), FP-GPs (OR 6.39, 95% CI 3.39-12.05) and Newfoundlanders (OR 7.01, 95% CI 2.16-22.71). CONCLUSION: The MUN medical school has made a substantial contribution to rural physician supply in both NL and Canada. Increasing the number of local rural students as well as providing incentives to graduates to complete postgraduate training in family medicine in the province may increase the number of locally trained rural physicians.     

Surveying graduates of combined internal medicine-pediatrics residency programs

Graduates of all U.S. combined internal medicine-pediatrics residency programs were surveyed in 1987 regarding a variety of demographic information about their residencies and current practices, the residency curricula they had followed for both specialties, and recommendations for modifications in training. The 71 responding graduates (from a total of 112) reported patient care as their major involvement (mean of 42.9 hours per week), with a majority (83%) seeing patients in both pediatric and adult age groups. Most were involved in primary care only (64%). The graduates reported that during both pediatrics and internal medicine training, they had had too many inpatient and intensive care rotations and too few elective and ambulatory rotations. The most important subspecialty rotations in internal medicine were considered to be cardiology, dermatology, and pulmonary medicine; and in pediatrics, infectious disease, cardiology, and adolescent medicine. The graduates recommended more outpatient subspecialty rotations, ambulatory rotations in medicine and pediatrics, and a combined medicine-pediatrics continuity clinic.     

The residency program in social medicine of Montefiore Medical Center: 37 years of mission-driven, interdisciplinary training in primary care, population health, and social medicine.

Founded in 1970 to train physicians to practice in community health centers and underserved areas, the Residency Program in Social Medicine (RPSM) of Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, has graduated 562 board-eligible family physicians, general internists, and pediatricians whose careers fulfill this mission. The RPSM was a model for federal funding for primary care residency programs and has received Title VII grants during most of its history. The RPSM has tailored its mission and structured its curriculum to promote a community and population orientation and to provide the requisite knowledge and skills for integrating social medicine into clinical practice. Six unique hallmarks of RPSM training are (1) mission-oriented resident recruitment/selection and self-management, (2) interdisciplinary collaborative training among primary care professionals, (3) community-health-center-based and community-oriented primary care education, (4) biopsychosocial and ecological family systems curriculum, (5) the social medicine core curriculum and projects, and (6) grant support through Title VII. These hallmark curricular, training, and funding elements, in which population health is deeply embedded, have been carefully evaluated, regularly revised, and empirically validated since the program's inception. Practice outcomes for RPSM graduates as leaders in and advocates for population health and the care of underserved communities are described and discussed in this case study.     

The integrative family medicine program: an innovation in residency education.

The Integrative Family Medicine (IFM) Program is a four-year combined family medicine residency program and integrative medicine fellowship. It was created in 2003 to address the needs of four constituencies: patients who desire care from well trained integrative physicians, physicians who seek such training, the health care system which lacks a conventional integrative medicine training route, and educational leaders in family medicine who are seeking new strategies to reverse the declining interest in family medicine amongst U.S. graduates. The program was designed jointly by the University of Arizona Program in Integrative Medicine (PIM) and family medicine residency programs at Beth Israel/Albert Einstein College of Medicine (AECOM), Maine Medical Center, Middlesex Hospital, Oregon Health & Science University, and the Universities of Arizona and Wisconsin. One or two residents from each of these institutions may apply, and when selected, commit to extending their training by a fourth year. They complete their family medicine residencies at their home sites, enroll in the distributed learning associate fellowship at PIM, and are mentored by local faculty members who have training in integrative medicine. To date three classes totaling twenty residents have entered the program. Evaluation is performed jointly: PIM evaluates the residents during residential weeks and through online modules and residency faculty members perform direct observation of care and review treatment plans. Preliminary data suggest that the program enhances interest amongst graduating medical students in family medicine training. The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education Family Medicine residency review committee has awarded the pilot experimental status.     

Physicians at the medicine/psychiatric interface: what do internist/psychiatrists do?

Studies have convincingly demonstrated that some 50% of patients in primary care settings have both medical and psychiatric diagnoses requiring dual treatment. The concept of primary care psychiatry has emerged in recent years as one way to address this problem. In 1979 the first combined medicine-psychiatry residency was formed. There are now over 20 such programs, but there is little information on how these doubly trained physicians actually practice. In 1997, the authors surveyed the 268 physicians with board certification in both internal medicine and psychiatry that were listed with the American Board of Medical Specialties. Only 15% practiced any type of medicine at all; the rest were involved only in the practice of psychiatry. Although 75% identified themselves only as psychiatrists and worked predominantly in psychiatry, 95% reported using both their medical and psychiatric training in their professional work. They reported that the dual training made them better physicians, improved their professional credibility, and enhanced their diagnostic skills. Several significant barriers were discovered that directly affect the ability of physicians to practice in two fields. Findings, study limitations, and potential implications for the field and its patients are discussed.     

Major changes in medical careers following medical school graduation: when, how often, and why

Knowledge of the timing of, reasons for, and frequency of major medical-career changes of medical school graduates is useful in considering physician manpower needs. This study reports aspects of the medical-career changes made by a cohort of Alberta medical school graduates who graduated from 1973-1985. Of the 603 (81%) who participated, 160 (27%) reported major medical career changes. Significantly more specialists (35%) than family physicians (18%) made major changes. Forty-two percent made changes during the first year of residency, 21% later in residency, and 29% after entering practice. Reasons cited included general dissatisfaction (47%), lifestyle compatibility (24%), and training and practice experiences (19%). This study indicates that while personal needs and preferences influence changes during residency, practice experience is also important to career choices.     

Obstetrician-gynecologists and primary care: training during obstetrics-gynecology residency and current practice patterns.

PURPOSE: To assess obstetrician-gynecologists' perceptions of their residency training in primary care, document health issues assessed at annual visits, and identify practice patterns of both generalist and specialist obstetrician-gynecologists. METHOD: Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of 1,711 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Young Fellows in September 2005. Information was gathered on perceptions about adequacy of residency training, how well training prepared obstetrician-gynecologists for current practice, and typical practice patterns for various medical diagnoses. Data were analyzed using univariate analysis of variance, t tests, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Of 935 respondents (55% response rate), physicians estimated that 37% of private, nonpregnant patients rely on them for routine primary care. Approximately 22% report that they needed additional primary care training, specifically for metabolism/nutrition and dermatologic, cardiovascular, and psychosexual disorders. A wide range of topics, except for immunizations, were typically discussed at annual visits. Patients with pulmonary diseases, vascular diseases, and nongenital cancers were most often referred to specialists, whereas patients with urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted infections, or who are menopausal are most often managed totally. Self-identification as a generalist or specialist was associated with some practice patterns. Respondents were neutral about the role of primary care in obstetrics-gynecology residency training. CONCLUSIONS: For several primary care issues, obstetrician-gynecologists assumed sole management for obstetric patients but deferred to a primary care physician for gynecological patients. There is a continuing need for primary care training in obstetrics-gynecology residency, although it is unclear whether current training is adequate to meet their needs.     

Assessment of international medical graduates and their integration into family practice: the Clinician Assessment for Practice Program

The Clinician Assessment for Practice Program (CAPP), a program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia (CPSNS), assesses the readiness for family practice of international medical graduates (IMGs) who have trained and practiced abroad with no formal Canadian residency training.CAPP has three parts. Part A, a therapeutics exam and an objective structured clinical examination, assesses practice readiness. Part B is a 12-month mentorship in which the CAPP physician is in active practice under a defined license and is mentored by an established family physician. The mentor provides teaching, supervision, guidance, and regular performance assessment. Each CAPP physician negotiates an individualized continuing medical education plan. An on-site assessment of each CAPP physician's practice is conducted by an external assessor who provides feedback to the CAPP physician and his or her mentor. Multisource feedback is administered at 10 months, using questionnaires from patients and colleagues. After 12 months, all assessment data are reviewed by the CPSNS to determine whether to continue the defined license. Part C, run by the registration department (not CAPP), may last three additional years until full licensure is obtained.To date, 148 IMGs have been assessed, 35 have been deemed eligible for a defined license, and 27 have entered family practice, virtually all in small or medium-sized communities in Nova Scotia. The program has been well received by participants and their communities. The mentorship, particularly valuable in assisting IMGs to integrate into their communities, has proven to be the defining feature of CAPP.     

Matching community need with physician training: the OSU Urban Family Medicine Program

There continues to be a shortage of primary care physicians practicing within urban, Iower-socioeconomic and minority communities despite the fact that many of the 125 allopathic and 19 osteopathic medical schools are located within the affected urban cities. Recognizing a need to better train and recruit primary care physicians to serve in urban settings and provide care to those underserved. The Ohio State Department of Family Medicine established an Urban Family Medicine Residency Program headquartered in Near East Columbus, OH. Starting in 2003, the Urban Family Medicine Residency Program began training up to two residents each academic year. The mission, vision and (curriculum have attracted residency applicants and faculty who have displayed sincere interest and commitment to practicing in urban lower socioeconomic communities.     

The geographic relationships between physicians' residency sites and the locations of their first practices

The uneven geographic distribution of physicians has been identified as a significant problem for the delivery of health care services. The present study examined one of the factors that contribute to the distribution of physicians; how far they move from their residency sites to establish their first practices. In 1989, the authors selected a random sample of 701 U.S. residency programs in the ten specialties with the most practitioners, and measured the distance each of these physicians moved to his or her first practice location. Of the 701 programs, 58.5% provided usable information about 2,612 physicians. Of these physicians, over 40% had moved less than 10 miles from their residencies, and over 50% had moved less than 75 miles. Comparisons among the physicians from the various specialties showed that the primary care physicians moved significantly shorter distances than did those from the other specialties. In the last two decades, many efforts have been made to increase the geographic distribution of physicians. The evidence from this study suggests that so far as the distances that physicians move from their practice sites are concerned, little has changed. Recent graduates of residency programs show no more tendency to move far from their residency sites than did their counterparts 30 years ago, as reported in the literature.     

The general practitioner: How much psychiatric education?

One hundred nine general physicians practicing in small rural communities completed questionnaires regarding the number of patients they saw with psychiatric problems. Respondents were also asked to give details of their psychiatric and medical training, to indicate where they obtained new information about psychiatric topics, and to rate the importance of 36 items in daily medical practice. Over one half felt their medical school training in psychiatry was not on par with that received in internal medicine, OB-GYN, surgery, and pediatrics. We suggest the 36 items they ranked be used as a guide in developing a core curriculum for family practice residency training programs as well as for the design of continuing medical education for general physicians.     

Behavioral medicine in Russian family medicine

The Russian Federation's recently adopted family medicine as a specialty, but with little or no training in psychosocial and behavioral issues, unlike many training programs in other countries. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the perceptions and experiences of Russian primary care physicians regarding the practice of behavioral medicine and psychosocial methods. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with ten Russian family physicians. Examination of key words, phrases, and concepts used by the physicians revealed five themes that physicians related to their incorporation of psychosocial/behavioral medicine methods: (1) factors limiting the practice of behavioral medicine (inadequate training; cultural barriers); (2) demand for behavioral medicine services; (3) patient-doctor issues related to behavioral medicine (e.g., communication); (4) physician's role strain; and (5) intuition and experience. These findings suggest that Russia's new family physicians would benefit from residency and post-graduate curricula in behavioral sciences, tailored to their unique needs.     

Medical students trained abroad and medical manpower. Recent trends and predictions

Physicians trained in foreign medical schools, including U.S. citizens, are once again playing a larger part in the provision of medical are in this country. After a decrease in the numbers of such physicians from 1977 through 1980, the number of foreign nationals entering the National Resident Matching Program increased by 312 per cent, and the number of U.S. citizens from foreign schools increased by 273 per cent. U.S. graduates of foreign medical schools participating in Fifth Pathway programs appear to benefit from their extra year of clinical training by being more successful in the National Resident Matching Program and having a higher pass rate on state licensing examinations. These increases in physicians trained in foreign medical schools, together with an increasing number of students graduating from U.S. medical schools, have resulted in an insufficient total number of first-year postgraduate positions, regardless of the specialty, to accommodate all physicians seeking a first-year residency. Since the number of residency positions will probably not expand to meet applicant demand, an increase in the pool of physicians with neither residency training nor licenses to practice medicine is likely. Alien foreign medical-school graduates and U.S. students who go abroad to study medicine can no longer take for granted residency training and practice in the United Stages.