Formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg (delivered dose) has a rapid onset and 12-h duration of bronchodilation

Clinical trials show that formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler 4.5 microg delivered dose (6 microg metered dose) has a rapid onset of bronchodilation similar to that of salbutamol and a 12-h duration of action. Maximum increase in FEV(1) and duration of bronchodilation are dose-dependent, the 4.5 microg dose being the lowest dose tested giving both effects.Clinical studies investigating onset of bronchodilation show a significant increase in specific airway conductance occurring within 1 min after inhalation of formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg. When measured from 3-20 min after inhalation, formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg showed similar increases in FEV(1) to salbutamol administered via pMDI. No difference in onset of bronchodilation was observed between the formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 and 9 microg doses.Single-dose studies and studies of 1-12 weeks' duration show that formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg produces a significant and clinically important mean bronchodilating effect for > or =12 h after inhalation. In the cited studies no significant differences in duration of bronchodilation were observed between the formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 and 9 microg doses.Conclusion: clinical data show that formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg is an effective dose in patients with asthma, with a rapid onset of bronchodilation and a duration of at least 12 h.     

Onset of action of single doses of formoterol administered via Turbuhaler in patients with stable COPD

We studied 16 patients with stable COPD in a double blind, double dummy, placebo-controlled, within patient study to see if formoterol could be used as a rescue drug. We compared the of onset of bronchodilation obtained with formoterol 12 microg (metered dose corresponding to 9 microg delivered dose) and formoterol 24 microg (metered dose corresponding to 18 microg delivered dose), both delivered via Turbuhaler, with that of salbutamol 400 microg and salbutamol 800 microg delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Patients inhaled single doses of placebo, formoterol and salbutamol on five separate days. FEV1 was measured in baseline condition and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min after inhalation of each treatment. We examined two separate criteria for deciding if a response was greater than that expected by a random variation of the measurement: (1) a rise in FEV1 of at least 15% from the baseline value; (2) an absolute increase in FEV1 of at least 200 ml. Formoterol 12 microg (15.2 min; 95% CI 9.5-21.0) and formoterol 24 microg (15.1 min; 95% CI 8.9-21.2) caused a rise in FEV1 of at least 15% from the baseline value almost rapidly as salbutamol 400 microg (13.6 min; 95% CI 7.1-20.1) and salbutamol 800 microg (14.5 min; 95% CI 7.1-21.9). No significant difference (P=0.982) in onset of action was seen between the four active treatments. According to Criterion 2, the mean time to 200 ml increase in FEV1 was 11.1 min (95% CI: 7.0-15.2) after salbutamol 400 microg, 13.0 min (95% CI: 7.9-18.1) after salbutamol 800 microg, 14.7 min (95% CI: 7.1-22.4) after formoterol 12 microg, and 12.7 min (95% CI: 7.4-18.0) after formoterol 24 microg. Again, there was no significant difference (P= 0.817) between the four active treatments. Formoterol Turbuhaler 12 microg and 24 microg caused bronchodilation as rapidly as salbutamol 400 microg and 800 microg given via pMDI.     

Onset and duration of action of formoterol and tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management guidelines recommend regular treatment with one or more long-acting bronchodilators for patients with moderate to severe COPD. OBJECTIVE: To compare the onset and duration of action of formoterol and tiotropium in patients with COPD. METHODS: This randomized, multicentre, open-label crossover study in 38 patients with COPD (mean age 64 years; mean FEV(1) 55% predicted) assessed the effect of 7 days of treatment with formoterol (12 microg b.i.d. via Foradil Aerolizer) vs. tiotropium (18 microg o.d. via Spiriva HandiHaler) on lung function measured over a period of 12 h after the first dose on day 1 and the last dose on day 8. RESULTS: The primary efficacy variable, FEV(1)-AUC during the first 2 h post-dose (FEV(1)-AUC(10-120 min)), was significantly higher for formoterol compared with tiotropium, with between-treatment differences of 124 ml (p = 0.016) after the first dose and 80 ml (p = 0.036) after 7 days' treatment in favour of formoterol. FEV(1) measured 12 h after inhalation did not differ statistically significantly between treatments. Adverse events occurred in 2 (5%) patients after treatment with formoterol and in 5 (12%) patients after treatment with tiotropium. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates faster onset of action and greater bronchodilation of formoterol vs. tiotropium for bronchodilation within the first 2 h of inhalation (FEV(1)-AUC(10-120 min)) and comparable bronchodilation 12 h post-inhalation in patients with moderate to severe COPD.     

Influence of higher than conventional doses of oxitropium bromide on formoterol-induced bronchodilation in COPD

We examined the influence of higher than conventional doses of oxitropium bromide on formoterol-induced bronchodilation in patients with partially reversible stable COPD. Twenty outpatients inhaled one or two puffs of formoterol (12 microg puff(-1)), or placebo. Two hours after inhalation, a dose-response curve to inhaled oxitropium bromide (100 microg puff(-1)) or placebo was constructed using one puff, one puff, two puffs and two puffs, for a total cumulative dose of 600 microg oxitropium bromide. Doses were given at 20-min intervals and measurements made 15 min after each dose. On six separate days, all patients received one of the following: (1) formoterol 12 microg + oxitropium bromide 600 microg, (2) formoterol 12 microg + placebo, (3) formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide 600 microg, (4) formoterol 24 microg + placebo, (5) placebo + oxitropium bromide 600 microg, or (6) placebo + placebo. Both formoterol 12 microg and 24 microg induced a good bronchodilation (formoterol 12 microg, 0.19-0.20 l; formoterol 24 microg 0.22-0.24 l). The dose-response curve of oxitropium, but not placebo, showed an evident increase in FEV1, with a further significant increase of respectively 0.087 l and 0.082 l after the formoterol 12 microg and formoterol 24 microg pre-treatment. This study shows that improved pulmonary function in patients with stable COPD may be achieved by adding oxitropium 400-600 microg to formoterol. There is not much difference in bronchodilation between combining oxitropium with formoterol 12 microg or 24 microg. In any case, formoterol 24 microg alone seems sufficient to achieve the same bronchodilation induced by oxitropium 600 microg alone in most patients.     

A single high dose of formoterol is as effective as the same dose administered in a cumulative manner in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD

Several clinical trials have shown that the inhaled beta2-agonists with long-acting properties, formoterol and salmeterol, may be effective in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there is a great deal of controversy regarding the timing and optimal dose of inhaled beta2-agonists in this pathologic condition. In this double-blind, randomised, crossover study, we have compared the bronchodilating effect and the safety of inhaled formoterol administered via Turbuhaler using either a cumulative dose regimen or the equivalent single dose in 16 patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. On the two consecutive days, the patients received, in a randomised order, each of the following active dose regimens: (A): 9 + 9 + 18 microg of formoterol via Turbuhaler (36 microg cumulative delivered dose) or (B): 36 + 0 + 0 microg of formoterol via Turbuhaler. The three doses on each treatment day were administered at 30-mm intervals, with measurements being made 5 and 30 min after each dose. Contemporaneously, we also measured oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) and pulse rate. Both the high dose and the cumulative one induced a significant bronchodilation expressed as change in FEV1. The difference between the two regimens was significant (P=0.0332) only 60 min after the first inhalation. The trend of FVC and IC was similar to that of FEV1. All treatment regimens were well tolerated and no adverse events were reported. Neither the administration ofthe high dose nor that of the cumulative one modified heart rate in a significant manner. Also they did not influence SpO2. This study indicates that a single high dose offormoterol is as effective as the same dose administered in a cumulative manner in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD.     

Onset of action following formoterol Turbuhaler and salbutamol pMDI in reversible chronic airway obstruction

Short-acting beta(2)-agonists are currently recommended for symptom relief in asthma and the treatment of mild, acute exacerbations in COPD. However, formoterol has as fast an onset of action as salbutamol with the additional benefit of longer-lasting bronchodilation (approximately 12 h). Furthermore, systemic side effects observed with formoterol are of a similar duration but less pronounced than with short-acting beta(2)-agonists. In this double-blind, randomized, cross-over study, 20 adult patients with reversible chronic airway obstruction (intrinsic asthma or COPD) inhaled single doses of formoterol 9 microg or salbutamol 100 microg (group A) or formoterol 18 microg or salbutamol 200 microg (group B). FEV(1) was measured prior to and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min following inhalation of study drug. No significant differences in FEV(1) values were observed between group A (P=0.704) or group B (P=0.270) at baseline, or at 5 (Group A: P=0.340; Group B: P=0.559) and 15 min (Group A: P=0.526; Group B: P=0.818) post dose. No adverse events were reported during the study. Formoterol Turbuhaler has as rapid an onset of action as salbutamol pMDI when given at the recommended doses.     

Formoterol Turbuhaler for as-needed therapy in patients with mild acute exacerbations of COPD.

Worsening of underlying bronchospasm may be associated with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As airway obstruction becomes more severe, the therapeutic option is to add a short-acting inhaled beta2-agonist as needed to cause rapid relief of bronchospasm. Unfortunately however, the most effective dosage may increase above that recommended during acute exacerbations. Formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler has a rapid onset of action (within minutes) and demonstrates a maintained effect on a rway function. In this study, we examined the effects of formoterol used as needed in 20 patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. A dose response curve to inhaled formoterol (9 microg per inhalation) or placebo was constructed using three separate inhalations, i.e. a total cumulative dose of 27 microg. Dose increments were given at 20-min intervals, with measurements being made 15 min after each dose. Formoterol, but not placebo, induced a large and significant (P<0.001) dose-dependent increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) [mean differences from baseline = 0.1311 after 9 microg formoterol (95% CI: 0.096-0.167)] 0.1811 after 18 microg formoterol (95% CI: 0.140-0.2221) and 0.2081 after 27 microg formoterol (95% CI: 0.153-0.2631). However, 27 microg formoterol did not induce further benefit [0.0271 (95% CI: -0.008-0.0621); P=0.121] when compared wth 18 microg formoterol. Results of this study suggest the use of higher than customary dose of formoterol for as-needed therapy to provide rapid relief of bronchospasm in patients suffering from acute exacerbations of partially reversible COPD.     

Acute protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by formoterol, salmeterol and terbutaline.

The onset of bronchoprotection as obtained by various beta2-agonists has not been examined in a comparitive study. In this study, the onset of bronchodilation and protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatics after inhalation of the long-acting beta2-agonists formoterol and salmeterol and the short-acting beta2-agonist terbutaline were measured. Twenty-five subjects with asthma and a history of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (mean baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1): 90% predicted; mean fall in FEV1 after exercise: 31% from baseline) were enrolled in this double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, randomized, four-period crossover study. Exercise challenges were performed on 12 days at either 5, 30, or 60 min after inhalation of a single dose of formoterol (12 microg Turbuhaler), salmeterol (50 microg Diskus), terbutaline (500 microg Turbuhaler) or placebo. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (maximum fall in FEV1 or area under the curve) did not differ significantly between terbutaline, formorerol and salmeterol either 5, 30, or 60 min after inhalation of the study medication. In contrast, the onset of bronchodilation was slower after salmeterol compared to terbutaline and formoterol (p<0.05, each), which both showed a similar time course. At all time points between 5 and 60 min, formoterol provided significantly greater bronchodilation than salmeterol (p<0.05). These data indicate that equipotent doses of the bronchodilators salmeterol, formoterol and terbutaline were similarly effective with respect to their short-term protective potency against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, despite the fact that the time course of bronchodilation was significantly different between the three beta2-agonists.     

Lung deposition and efficacy of inhaled formoterol in patients with moderate to severe COPD

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of COPD on lung deposition of inhaled drugs and the relationship between lung-dose and response of pulmonary function measurements. METHODS: Nineteen patients with varying degrees of COPD were randomized to inhale single doses of formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler 4.5, 9, 18, and 36 microg in a double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. Urinary excreted formoterol during 32 h was used to determine absolute lung deposition. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and inhaled volume (IV) were recorded to assess the patients' ability to use Turbuhaler. Efficacy was measured by spirometry, inspiratory capacity (IC), airway conductance (sG(AW)), and absolute lung volumes. RESULTS: Mean pulmonary bioavailability of formoterol was about 24% of the nominal delivered dose after inhalation for the different treatments. No significant correlations between lung deposition and baseline FEV(1), PIF or IV were shown. All formoterol doses produced statistically significant increases in FEV(1), FVC, IC, and sG(AW) relative to placebo. Linear dose/response relationships were observed for these variables, with more narrow limits of the slopes for the lung-dose/response relationships than for the nominal-dose/response relationships. Moreover, 36 and 18 microg formoterol statistically significantly decreased functional residual capacity (FRC) and residual volume (RV) relative to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This study could not show any difference in lung deposition of formoterol inhaled via Turbuhaler between patients with moderate and severe COPD. Moreover, the effect of formoterol on various pulmonary function measurements were more closely related to lung deposition than the inhaled nominal dose.     

Safety of formoterol Turbuhaler at cumulative dose of 90 microg in patients with acute bronchial obstruction.

This study compared the safety of formoterol (Oxis Turbuhaler; 90 microg delivered dose; 120 microg metered dose) with terbutaline (Bricanyl Turbuhaler; 10 mg), in patients with acute bronchoconstriction. Forty-eight patients (31 females) with a mean age of 45 yrs, were randomized into two parallel groups (double-blind design). Mean baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 0.98 L (33% of predicted normal). Study drugs were administered on six occasions during 3 h (formoterol 4.5 microg or terbutaline 0.5 mg x inhalation(-1), 20 inhalations). Patients received intravenous prednisolone after 1.5 h and oxygen during the first 3 h. Pulse rate, serum potassium, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter ECG, arterial blood gases and FEV1 were assessed during 12 h after the first dose. Four patients (one formoterol, three terbutaline) discontinued. The 12-h mean values of serum potassium decreased from 4.02 to 3.89 mmol x L(-1) for formoterol and from 4.22 to 3.76 mmol x L(-1) for terbutaline. Mean 12-h pulse rate was significantly (p<0.01) higher in the terbutaline group (101.7 beats per minute (bpm)) than in the formoterol group (93.5 bpm). No individual patient value was considered clinically important or alarming. FEV1 improved in both groups but with no statistically significant difference between treatments. Oxis Turbuhaler (90 microg) was at least as safe and well tolerated as terbutaline (10 mg) [corrected] in patients with acute bronchoconstriction.     

Protection against cold air and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction while on regular treatment with Oxis.

This study aimed to compare the duration of protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) after inhalation of formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler with that of terbutaline Turbuhaler and placebo Turbuhaler in asthmatic patients treated regularly with formoterol Turbuhaler 9 microg b.i.d. and inhaled steroids. The study. performed at three centres (G?teborg and Lund, Sweden, and Trondheim, Norway), consisted of an open-label part with formoterol Turbuhaler 9 microg b.i.d. and a randomized, double-blind, cross-over part with a single dose (on top of the regular treatment) of either formoterol Turbuhaler 9 microg, terbutaline Turbuhaler 0.5 mg or placebo Turbuhaler. The patients attended the clinic six times: twice for screening visits, three times for randomized treatment and once for a follow-up visit. Patients received regular b.i.d. treatment with formoterol 9 microg for a mean period of 16 days. Formoterol gave a post-exercise fall of 12, 10, 15 and 17% in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 15 min, 4, 8 and 12 h after inhalation. The differences compared with placebo (falls of 26, 22, 23 and 22%) and terbutaline (falls of 17, 18, 22 and 22%) were all statistically significant (P<0.05 for all comparisons). Patients on regular treatment with formoterol Turbuhaler 9 microg b.i.d. have a significant protection against EIB up to 12 h after inhalation of formoterol 9 microg. The protection was also significantly better than that of terbutaline Turbuhaler 0.5 mg.     

Effects of formoterol (Oxis Turbuhaler) and ipratropium on exercise capacity in patients with COPD

Although long-acting inhaled beta 2-agonists improve various outcome measures in COPD, no double-blind study has yet shown a significant effect of these drugs on exercise capacity. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, patients received formoterol (4, 5, 9, or 18 micrograms b.i.d. via Turbuhaler), ipratropium bromide (80 micrograms t.i.d. via pMDI with spacer), or placebo for 1 week. Main endpoint was time to exhaustion (TTE) in an incremental cycle ergometer test. Secondary endpoints were Borg dyspnoea score during exercise, lung function, and adverse events. Thirty-four patients with COPD were included, mean age 64.8 years, FEV1 55.6% predicted, reversibility 6.1% predicted. All doses of formoterol, and ipratropium significantly improved TTE, FEV1, FEF25-75%, FRC, IVC, RV and sGAW compared with placebo. A negative dose-response relationship was observed with formoterol. Ipratropium increased time to exhaustion more compared with formoterol, 18 micrograms, but not with formoterol, 4.5 and 9 micrograms. No changes in Borg score were found. There was no difference in the adverse event profile between treatments. In conclusion, 1 week of treatment with formoterol and ipratropium significantly improved exercise capacity and lung function compared with placebo. However, a negative dose-response relation for formoterol was unexpected and needs further investigation.     

Effect of formoterol/budesonide combination on arterial blood gases in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe chronic airway obstruction might suffer dangerous hypoxemia after administration of a beta-agonist despite bronchodilation. METHODS: We first compared the acute effects on gas exchange of two doses of formoterol Turbuhaler (9 and 18 microg) in 10 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Afterwards, we compared the acute effects of formoterol Turbuhaler 9 microug with those of formoterol/budesonide combination in a single inhaler (Turbuhaler) 9/320 microg in 10 other patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Finally, we compared the changes in PaO(2) induced by formoterol Turbuhaler 9 microg or formoterol/budesonide combination in a single inhaler (Turbuhaler) 9/320 microg with those in FEV(1) in 10 other patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Each agent was given on separate days, and the patients' arterial blood gases were measured at baseline and at intervals of 120 min. RESULTS: Small but statistically significant declines in PaO(2) were found after administration of both formoterol 9 and 18 microg. In the second group of patients, formoterol 9 microg alone again induced a significant decrease in PaO(2). However, the simultaneous administration of budesonide 320 microg significantly reduced the acute effect of formoterol on PaO(2). In a third group of 10 patients we confirmed a small but significant decrease in PaO(2) after formoterol alone and the reduction of this effect when budesonide was administered simultaneously. Moreover, we also documented that addition of budesonide amplified the fast onset of action of formoterol. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that when treating patients suffering from acute exacerbation of COPD with formoterol, it is prudent to check their arterial blood gases. In any case, combined administration of formoterol and budesonide reduces the potential for acute effects of formoterol on blood-gas tensions.     

Relative therapeutic index between inhaled formoterol and salbutamol in asthma patients

A double-blind, randomized crossover study in 28 asthmatic patients assessed the relative therapeutic index for inhaled formoterol and salbutamol. Pre-drug administration FEV1 (mean 2.08 l) was 49-93% of predicted and reversibility 16-82% after inhalation of salbutamol. Patients inhaled single doses of formoterol (Oxis) (4.5,18 and 54 microg, delivered doses) via Turbuhaler, salbutamol (Ventolin) (200 and 1800 microg) via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and placebo at intervals of 48 h or more. Individual maximum FEV1 and minimum S-K+ were calculated. Relative local (maximum FEV1) and systemic (minimum S-K+) dose potencies, and their ratio, the relative therapeutic index, were estimated using a non-linear mixed effect model. The drug effects were well tolerated and dose dependent. A log-linear approximation was used to describe the bronchodilatory effect, whereas a sigmoid approximation was more apt to describe the decrease in serum potassium concentration. A bivariate dose-response model based on these principles was fitted simultaneously to all data. The mean relative therapeutic index between formoterol 4.5-54 microg given via Turbuhaler and salbutamol 200-1800 microg given via pMDI was estimated to be 2.5 in favour of formoterol; this trend was not statistically significant.     

Bronchodilator response to albuterol after regular formoterol and effects of acute corticosteroid administration

BACKGROUND: There is controversy about the development of bronchodilator subsensitivity after regular administration of long-acting beta(2)-agonists. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether regular treatment with formoterol affects the bronchodilator response to repeated puffs of albuterol, and also to assess the effects of acute administration of a bolus dose of IV or inhaled corticosteroid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients (mean [SD] age, 43 [15] years; FEV(1), 57 [17] % predicted) with stable, moderate to severe persistent asthma who were all taking inhaled corticosteroids were evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study. Patients received treatments each for 2 weeks followed by a bolus (IV/inhaled) of corticosteroid or placebo: (1) placebo inhaler bid + bolus placebo; (2) formoterol Turbuhaler 24 microg metered dosage bid (delivered dosage 18 microg bid) + placebo; (3) formoterol 24 microg bid + bolus IV hydrocortisone, 200 mg; or (4) formoterol 24 microg bid + bolus inhaled budesonide, 1,600 microg. Bronchodilator response to repeated puffs of albuterol (200 to 1,600 microg) for > 80 min was measured at 2 h after bolus administration of placebo or corticosteroid. The study was powered at the 80% level to detect a 20% difference in area under curve between 20 and 80 min (AUC) for FEV(1) response to albuterol as change from baseline (primary end point). RESULTS: There was significant subsensitivity (p = 0.01) of the mean albuterol FEV(1) response (as AUC, L x s) after formoterol alone (737) as compared to placebo (1,453) along with partial reversal by steroid administration: formoterol + hydrocortisone (1, 050), and formoterol + budesonide (942). There was a similar pattern of subsensitivity (p = 0.03) for the mean albuterol forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity response (as AUC, L): placebo (2,149), formoterol alone (1,002), formoterol + hydrocortisone (1,402), and formoterol + budesonide (1,271). CONCLUSION: Regular treatment with formoterol produced significant bronchodilator subsensitivity to repeated puffs of albuterol, which was partially reversed by a bolus dose of systemic or inhaled corticosteroid.     

Oxis (formoterol given by Turbuhaler) showed as rapid an onset of action as salbutamol given by a pMDI

Thirty-six adult patients (16 women) with mild to moderate asthma with a mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) of 73.8% (46-106%) of predicted normal value and mean reversibility of 24.2% (14.6-47.1%) were included in this double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled and cross-over study. The patients inhaled single doses 4.5 or 9 microg of formoterol (Oxis) via Turbuhaler salbutamol (Ventolin) 100 or 200 microg from a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) or placebo at five randomized visits. Efficacy was measured by FEV1 pre-dose and then 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min after inhalation of the study drug. The primary variable of efficacy was the FEV1-value 3 min after dose intake. No statistically significant differences were found between active treatments. All active treatments gave a higher bronchodilating effect at 3 min than placebo: 10.0, 11.4% for salbutamol 100 and 200 microg and 11.7, 11.8% for formoterol 4.5 and 9 microg (P<0.001 in all cases). There was a correlation between the measured response at 3 min and the subjective experience of the patients. The relative difference vs. placebo remained throughout the study period for all active treatments except for low dose salbutamol. All treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, formoterol Turbuhaler has as rapid an onset of action as salbutamol pMDI when given at recommended doses.     

The pharmacodynamic effects of single inhaled doses of formoterol, tiotropium and their combination in patients with COPD

The aim of this double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over, randomized, pilot study was to compare the acute bronchodilator efficacy of a single dose of formoterol with that of tiotropium in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Because the potential of tiotropium for additive effects is yet unknown, the acute effects of adding this anticholinergic agent to formoterol were also explored. A total of 20 outpatients with stable COPD were enrolled. Single doses of 12 microg formoterol, 18 microg tiotropium, and 12 microg formoterol+18 microg tiotropium were given. Serial measurements of FEV1 were performed over 24 h. Formoterol, either alone or in combination with tiotropium, elicited a significantly faster onset of action and showed a trend for a greater maximum bronchodilation than tiotropium alone. At 24 h, mean FEV1 continued to be significantly higher than pre-dosing value following tiotropium and formoterol+tiotropium. These findings indicate that formoterol and tiotropium have different profiles that make both agents attractive alternatives in the treatment of stable COPD. Since tiotropium ensures prolonged bronchodilation, whereas formoterol adds fast onset and a greater peak effect, the two drugs appear complementary.     

Incremental benefit of adding oxitropium bromide to formoterol in patients with stable COPD.

The effects of the long-acting beta(2)-agonist formoterol, the anticholinergic drug oxitropium bromide, and their combination were compared in 16 patients with partially reversible stable COPD. On each of 4 study days patients inhaled both drugs separated by 180 min in alternate sequence, with formoterol being administered in two doses (formoterol 12 microg + oxitropium bromide 200 microg; oxitropium bromide 200 microg + formoterol 12 microg; formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide 200 microg; oxitropium bromide 200 microg + formoterol 24 microg). FEV(1)and FVC were measured baseline and after 30, 60, 120, 180, 210, 240, 300 and 360 min. In terms of onset of action, formoterol performed better than oxitropium bromide. Within the first 180 min after inhalation formoterol 24 microg was the most effective drug (maximal change in FEV(1): formoterol 24 microg = 25.6%, formoterol 12 microg = 21.1%, oxitropium bromide = 18.2%). Increased bronchodilation was obtained when the second drug was added, the sequence formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide being the most effective (maximal change in FEV(1)over baseline: formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide 28.8%, oxitropium bromide + formoterol 24 microg 20.9%, formoterol 12 microg + oxitropium bromide 26.6%, oxitropium bromide + formoterol 12 microg 22.5%). Significant improvement in pulmonary function may be achieved by giving two different bronchodilators in stable COPD patients. The sequence formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide 200 microg seems to be the most effective.     

Efficacy of formoterol Turbuhaler in the emergency treatment of patients with obstructive airway diseases

Dry powder devices are rarely used in the emergency room (ER) treatment of acute and severe bronchoconstriction due to hesitations with respect to clinical efficacy. This study investigated the effects of two inhalers with formoterol in patients visiting the ER Department for acute and severe dyspnoea, mainly exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Two doses of 12mug formoterol were given at enrolment, either via Turbuhaler or via pressurised metered dose inhaler, connected to a spacer device (pMDI+S) in a double-blind way and parallel design. Another two doses of 12 microg formoterol were given after 30 min. Forced expiratory volume in the 1s (FEV(1)) and Borg dyspnoea score were assessed until 60 min. The study was designed to test non-inferiority in effects on FEV(1). Seventy-seven patients were enrolled with a mean age of 66 years and a FEV(1) of 1.03 L (39% of predicted). The effects of the two treatments were almost identical. The mean improvement in FEV(1) at 60 min after formoterol Turbuhaler was 94% of the improvement after formoterol pMDI+S. A statistically significant non-inferiority was shown (p=0.037) at 60 min (primary endpoint) as well as at 5 and 30 min (secondary endpoints, p=0.0043 and 0.013, respectively). Improvements in the Borg dyspnoea score and other lung-function parameters did not differ significantly between the two devices. In conclusion, formoterol Turbuhaler was equally effective as formoterol pMDI+S in the treatment of acute bronchoconstriction within the ER.     

Single-dose comparison of formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler 6 microg and formoterol Aerolizer 12 microg in moderate to severe asthma: a randomised,crossover study

Formoterol inhaled via Turbuhaler (Oxis) or Aerolizer (Foradil) produces fast and long-lasting bronchodilation in asthmatic patients. While formoterol Turbuhaler provides sustained efficacy for > or =12h at a metered dose of 6 microg (delivered dose 4.5 microg), the recommended metered dose for formoterol Aerolizer is 12 microg (delivered dose unknown). This difference may be attributable to improved lung deposition with the Turbuhaler. This open, randomised, crossover study compared the effects of a single metered dose of formoterol Turbuhaler 6 microg and formoterol Aerolizer 12 microg in 16 patients with stable moderate-to-severe asthma. Pulmonary function, assessed by measuring specific airway conductance (sGaw), was determined at intervals of < or =8h post-inhalation of each drug on separate study days. Both inhalers increased sGaw at all time points. There were no significant differences between the two formulations in onset of activity, maximum effect, duration of effect or area under the response curve. Furthermore, both treatments were well tolerated with no differences in adverse events, blood pressure or heart rate; thus the formoterol Turbuhaler may, therefore, have an improved therapeutic index. This pilot study indicates that the same clinical effect can be achieved with half the metered dose (6 microg) of formoterol Turbuhaler compared with formoterol Aerolizer (12 microg).